God doesn't hate anything. When your saying god hates gays, your telling us that he lied, cause doesn't it say in the bible that god loves everything?
@BlackBeltOfADDICTION \no true our numbers are now at 14 million up from 12 million. Homosexuality is made from perversion and not love. btw im only half white so i therefore cannot be in the inbreeded kkk. LOLOLOLOLOL
I remember wen i lived in CA nd wen prop 8 came out nd I personally believe in gay marrage cuz ya kno wat, itz not everybody else's decision who u truly love in ur heart, same sex or not, nd if they wanna get married nd b happy, so b it
I'm a Mormon and God made man and woman to be together to worship him and to make kids. Two men or two women cannot produce children. Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve and quit saying foo!
@norseczar27 some women are barren/have problems with fertility and some men have a low sperm count and cant have children, so the fact that two of the same sex cant produce is irrelevant. Homosexuality is found in tons of other species but homophobia is only found in one, us.
Hmm...so you are a Christian and you believe in God, yet you believe that the meaning of life is what ever comes to your mind?
Doesn't the Bible teach you that the meaning of life is the pursuit of absolution, and the preparation for the after life? (If you are part of the West Baptist Church forger what i said)
WHATS GOOD LITTLE LOCA?!JUST WANTED TO DROP A FEW LINES I KNOW UR STEVIE N SHIT BUT ITS KOO I MUST ADMIT I DIG LITTLE LOCA OUTTA ALL UR CHARACTERS.SHES THE REALEST N WELL THE MOST FIRME CHULITA OUT THERE. LOL SHIT AFTER I SAW THAT BIEBER VIDEO..LMAO TRIPPED ME OUT PERO WHATEVERS CLEVER LITTLE LOCA TIGHT KEEP DOING IT UP..ALRATOZ
jesus also said, "Cast not your pearls before two legged pigs and give not what is Holy unto two legged dogs unless they trample them under their feet and tear your throat out.!", girl you have to judge what a two legged pig is, you have to judge what a two legged dog is, human sperm are living thinking spirit creatures, they do not belong being forced into human shit.! Fagots and lesbians are all God Damned human two legged pigs, "WORSE", MISS FOOL.! "THE COMPANION OF FOOLS WILL BE DESTROYED
Do you know how hypocritical that is? When YOU find the one you love, YOU are going to want to marry them, just like a gay man/woman is going to want to marry their man/woman. When you find who you want to be with for the rest of your life, you're going to get married. So stfu and stop being a hypocrite.
Every study says a child a natural family is the ideal environment.How do children get male & womanhood bonding available only in a natural marriage?Saying marriage is a civil right is an insult to Dr. King & Malcolm X.Sodomy is not a civil right.Dr. Robert Spitzer, who got this off the list of mental diseases in the 1980's said 2001: "I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that's untrue some people can and do change"
@koriconprez We are already all sinners and deserve to go to hell so I don't think by a guy marrying a guy it's gonna be tht bad becuz even saying OMG is as bad as murdering someone
It is not our responsibility to judge. It is however our responsibility to live our lives to be a testimony to God. We are to be fishers of men. So no, we don't judge but we don't sit back and watch what grieves God.
You are right in that it is not our place to judge. You are wrong when you say the meaning f life is whatever you want it to be and whatever my brain wants it to be. No, I don't need other people to tell me what anything means. I have a brain and I have a heart of free will and with free will I have consequences. That is why I need the Bible. The Bible tells me what is right and what is wrong. The bible is all inclusive word of God. It is his instruction manual. (Basic Instructions Before Leavi
Religious people say that the bible said that marriage is between a woman and man. When if god didn't want gay, bisexual, lesbian, and transgender people to get marry why did he make us like this. Sadly to say i have lost faith in god in my heart because of what has been going on. And I am a 13 year old girl that is BISEXUAL and is afraid that they world would not except me. And one quick thing is that the ONLY difference between gay and straight people is that gay people like the same gender.
The meaing of marriage and your divorce comment don't really make sense. Im sure you agree divorce is a horrible thing, and should be avoided by working out your problems if possible. You're saying people already took the meaning out of marriage. But by your implication, you're saying if this horrible epidemic(divorce) is on the rise it should be OK to have same sex marriage.
No one asked you to judge shawty. If you believe in Gods word then you would know it is YOUR responsibility to stand up for it's values. If the Bible says do not kill or rape or steal etc. and someone does one of those things to you or your loved one, you're not going to just sit back and say "Im not going to judge." Standing up for what is right is NOT judging.
Where do these religious people get off thinking they have a valid reason to deny a group of human beings their rights?! The richest country in the world momentarily went against on its own constitution and ethos, 'cos of a bunch of SELFISH people inflicting their agendas on others. Unlike my country with its multi-layered fragmented, loop-holes ridden "unwritten" constitution, the USA's is clear and straightforward. Please treat it with respect.
Type in your favorite search engine (allinaccessories2440 ebay store) Let's have a blast at white party this year. Visit the ebay store and thank you so much for your support.
Why limit marriage to two people?Threeway marriage should be legal.While the New Testament is more strict,Old Testament men were permitted multiple wives and sex slaves.I'm not kidding.We now call that human trafficking.
Little Loca lies because same sex marriages were recognized already as domestic partnerships and civil unions. Why try and change marriage just so homosexuals can feel better about themselves. If civil unions wren't fair than change laws concerning civil unions not change the definition of marriage which is specifically between a man and a woman. At the end of the day homosexuals will never be equal because they can't propogate without the opposite sex involved in some way shape or form.
@thebayarea95122 that's not true. otherwise a human being couldn't make any judgments and EVERYONE makes prejudgments. Also God CLEARLY condemns homosexuality. We're not judging we're just restating what GOD has already passed judgment on. Those who don't repent of sexual immorality homosexuals and heterosexuals alike WILL face HELL FIRE. Those aren't my words those are God's words.
@idaman12345 THE BIBLE IS GODS WORD. There are many writers but one AUTHOR GOD. EVERYONE JUDGES on a daily basis all of man is programed to do so. What the Bible refers to judging is CONDEMNING SOMEONE TO HELL. I don't have that power people EVERY DAY choose to GO TO HELL BY HOLDING ON TO SIN they put themselves there. To reiterated GODS JUDGEMENTS IS NOT JUDGING.
@thebayarea95122 GOD IS CLEAR ON HOMOSEXUALITY. To reiterate God's judgements is not JUDGING. Also the judging of the Bible as you are mentioning and mentioning out of CONTEXT refers to ETERNAL CONSEQUENCES not judging on a daily basis as God designed in ALL men to THINK WITH FREE WILL.
prop 8 was not just about marriage. they wanted to change the entire culture to suit homosexuals, only a small percentage of the population. they wanted to ban the term "mom and dad" and take away religious holidays.
@idaman12345 ok, maybe not exactly like that, but they were trying to change the culture completley. it was so stupid. all that for marriage. COME ON PEOPLE. :)
I think it's undemocratic what that judge did. He completely went against the voice of the majority. That's WRONG. I don't have an opinion on gay marriage. I really couldn't care less what people wanna do in their lives. I just wish the government would be EQUAL in giving power to the PEOPLE. Pisses me off.
If you pray to god you pray to god. It doesn't matter. What matters it some of you haters are on here and can't even spell. You're called faggots. Leave the gays alone you homos
@idaman12345 So the Flintones were GAY???? In the song, Well have a gay old time?.. does that mean Barney was Porking Fred and Wilma was carpet munching on Wilma???.. I Think not... Let's face it... Gays are not Gay, they are Homosexuals... plain and simple...Queers is another good name meaning odd or strange...I prefer that... Fag is ok.. so is Pillow biter, butt pirate, rump rider, weenie suckers, hershey hiway haggs, etc....
Read the Bible... Homosexuality is an enormous SIN!!!! Besides, being a queer is unnatural..If the meaning of life is hunting down fags, is that ok with you??? Not only that, but the mere thought turns my stomach...
@idaman12345 If it is so Natural, then why can't a same sex couple reproduce?.. It is this lifestyle that brought AIDS...Some guy fing another in the ass and then sucking his tool sounds sick to me...Iran has the right idea don't you think???j There are no gays in Iran...
Read the Bible... Homosexuality is an enormous SIN!!!! Besides, being a queer is unnatural..If the meaning of life is hunting down fags, is that ok with you???
Love you Little Loca. You've always been the best. Thanks for sticking up for all people out there. Also, girl, you've got the greatest lipstick ever.
I support freedom for all. And to deny one group from freedom is a stain on the American Constitution. I agree with the judge on that basis, however, what i don't agree with is the judge's statement (Quote)"Arguing against gay marriage is inarticulate" (End Quote).
Let me be as articulate as i can be. I believe in god, and god made a Man & Woman, when they come together in marriage it's called holy matrimony, and then they create offspring, a family.
sad day !!! we the people again do not have the right to choose what kinda of state we live in. the minority ruling the majority. wake up american its happing everyday you are losing rights daily
@idaman12345 no, when it was over turn the govt. said you have no right to live by the laws we as a people wanted. at that point it is not for the people by the people. we all have the same rights, you just want to change them to suit you.thats not equal thats special rights.the states make they laws, by the people for the people. not the liberal hilter want to bes.
@suckafree1973 Prove that one. It doesn' t mean your vote doesn't count, what it means is that the constitution of the united states counts, and ignorant, hateful, bigoted people can't just makes laws and rules and regulations unfairly to control other people. It stops people who are hateful and ignorant from making laws and rules based on ignorance. It protect people from people like you.
Now gay people are just a little more free than they were. GOD FORBID people don't live just like you!
@Mglosk 75 million voted against gay marriage and one gay judge can over turn that? whats the purpose. And i don't have to prove shit it already was written.
@DYE9 Members of the church will NOT be forced to perform gay marriage ceremonies unless they want to, nor will they be forced to honor gay marriage or change their beliefs. The only thing this affects is who gets a legal marriage license.
i dont really care about gay marriage. the only thing that bugs me about prop 8 is the fact that the mormons are being blamed, and i believe that a child deserves a mom and a dad.
@commentsxonly "and i believe that a child deserves a mom and a dad. " ok but wat about them kids in 3rd world countrys who doen't have a mom nor a dad. do u think its better for them not to have anyone to take care of them, whether then to let a same sex couple taking care of them? think about it, 2 dads or 2 moms is better than nobody. is not like we steal them kids off their parents and raise them. we adopt kids who doen't have a home.
@idaman12345 wth its not a cult. theyre standing up for the family, something really important to them. i want gays to stand up for their rights, as they should. but mormons should be allowed to stand up for theirs.
All of the United States knows what Prop 8 is. Not just California haha. I'm actually surprised that over 70% of California is against it. California is SOCIALLY a liberal state. Theres huge communities for gays. I actually read that a lot of gays voted for it. If you Google "gays against gay marriage" you will find several articles and I think theres a website founded by a gay, dedicated to the protest against gay marriage. To me marriage is just a legal document.
Obviously the effect of Prop 8 on my real life friends away from YouTube has an impact on my opinions, but it only makes them stronger, not different.
If you have sex before you are 18 then you are gambling with your health and your future. Even if you are lucky enough not to lose, you still don't win anything.
No one who loved you would ask you to risk everything.
Gay marriage is a violation of the Constitution of the United States of America. Mainly the 5th Amendment, which says a wife cannot testify against her husband and a husband cannot testify against his wife, because that would be the same as, "Self incrimination", which is a violation of the Constitution. Clearly the 5th Amendment is talking about a man and a woman. So Gay marriage falls under moral responsibility and not legal in the United States of America.
I'm pretty sure people should not take a bicentennial document that defined black people as only 3/5ths of a human being and use it to decide our modern civil rights issues. Even if that argument was infallible, does it mean the constitution shouldn't be changed? Does it mean our separation of church and state shouldn't have changed over the last few centuries? How about our justice system- should we go back to the judge-jury-executioner days of the sheriff, or preserve our modern understanding
of a "right to a speedy trial"? Remember, people: the days when these laws were considered constitutional was back when a lot of the Constitution's framers were still alive. So, yeah, maybe gay marriage isn't a constitutional right. But neither was bi-racial marriage. The spirit of the Constitution is what's important, not the initial intent, PuritianB.
Agreed. Gay marriage doesn't hurt anyone, doesn't effect anyones lives except for those in the marriage... so why take their rights away? They're American's and human beings, why don't they deserve equal rights just like everyone else?
@TarissaFerg Their rights weren't taken away to begin with. Any gay man can marry any woman they chose before and any lesbian can marry any man they chose because marriage is between a man and a woman. It is sad that in order for homosexuals to feel important that they have to step on marriage for everyone else. If Domestic Partnerships were not fair than change those laws not marriage.
@idaman12345 that's because marriage by definition is between a man and a woman just LIKE OSMOSIS by definition is EXCLUSIVELY the diffusion of WATER.
soo truee!!! i think the same way u know ..each person has their own lives to live it ain't perfect and last thing people should do is get in others pplz buisness!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's very simple people vote on their beliefs and sense of morality. Us christians vote on our beliefs which is marriage is between a man and a woman (Romans 1: 24-27, 1 Corinthians 6: 9-10, Jude 1: 7). Just as a bigamist cant get married to more then one wife, because the laws of the people said it's not a acceptable lifestyle. Us followers of Christ will continue to vote that which reflects our values and beliefs, just as you will do the same. I am not against civil unions by the way.
Divorce rate [and abuse rate] is lower in gay couples. Comparing same-sex marriages to people marrying trees/rocks/animals is kind of retarded. That doesn't even make sense. PEOPLE should have the right to marry WHOMEVER they choose [as long as they're of consent, obviously], because MARRIAGE = LOVE. Marriage is not about gender. BTW -- Pagans instituted the whole marriage thing before the Christians stole it.
@Gunslingerx0 Thank you! A lot of people don't know that prior to the middle ages, the church viewed marriage as a dirty, earthly institution. I find it ironic that nowadays, churches are putting more money than ever into keeping this dirty little secret to themselves, and at the same time trying to limit the spread of happiness. It's totally flipped.
Thirdly Pasha582, though a man and a woman are individuals, during mating, they unite bodily. So, it is more realistic to acknowledge that the whole process of copulation, involving as it does the brains of the man and woman, their nerves, blood, vaginal and other secretions, and coordinated biological activity does not occur during any other sex act other than male and female genital intercourse. Truly, a male and female consummate (i.e. complete) their marriage through sex.
Though a man & man are individuals, during mating they unite bodily. Some positions unite them more bodily than heterosexuals can. Two lesbians get each other's vaginal juices flowing, and consummate (i.e. complete) their marriage through the act of sympatric sexual intercourse. Their nerves tingle, and their blood flows, angels weep tears of joy, and heterosexual voyeurs, if they are present, praise God. The love people share is a beautiful thing. There is little enough joy in our world.
Just as the mouth, esophagus, small intestine, anus, etc. are individual parts that function and form a single digestive system (and certain other parts function and form the respiratory system, or circulatory system, etc.), a male and a female are individuals who possess the essential parts to become a single reproductive principle (even though reproduction may not result).
It's not so much the ability to reproduce, but the truth of the matter... that a man's sexual organ and a woman's sexual organ are complementary. Were the state to recognize one form of non-bodily unifying arrangement as marital, then no reason would exist not to limit marital status to any other form of arrangement... being able to marry a tree, rock, or alligator. This would place an unnecessary burden on the courts as well as jeopardize the welfare of individuals and communities.
I see no reason a man should not be able to marry a tree or a rock, provided the tree or rock is of lawful age and can evince informed consent through signing a marriage license. Same goes true for alligators, cows, or any other critter from which one might make a pair of shoes.
As I don't see that happening any time soon, I don't reckon there will be much more burden on the courts and communities than there are with religious zealots attacking gays.
Secondly Pasha582, and again, unlike the female anatomy, no area on the male anatomy functions as an emission receptor. The male sexual reproductive organ and the female sexual reproductive organ are complementary due to the fact that theyre sexual reproductive organs (just as the mouth, esophagus, small intestine, and anus are a part of the digestive system, while certain other parts belong to the circulatory system, or respiratory system, etc).
Humans routinely do things they wern't designed to do. Eg you can wear a wrist watch. Your arm wasn't made to accommodate a watch--instead the watch is fashioned to fit your wrist. From what I gather you're saying we shouldn't do something we can do because our parts weren't "designed" to do it. Strikes me as utterly irrelevant.
Youre comparing, as well as confusing, a crucial social issue such as marriage with something as negligible and irrelevant as wrist watch wearing. Also, this get each others vaginal juices flowing is specious reasoning, at best, when compared against the whole of the copulation process between a male and a female. This vaginal juices flowing is, again, a means to some other end. It does not unite two women more than heterosexual sex.
A crucial social issue? Have homosexuals lived together in ages past? Yes. Do they today? Yes. Do gay couples enjoy legal right to marry in other nations? Yes. Do those couples threaten the institution of marriage or the rights of others in those countries? No. The whole M/F sex process is specious reasoning compared to the social institution of marriage. Why this focus on sexual mechanics? There are lesbian couples far happier than many hetero pairings. Why oppress them as you do?
Decades of culturally supported fatherless homes which have wreaked havoc on the black community prove marriage isnt malleable to suit the subjective goals of individuals, couples, or groups.
Just because your black hetero dads lack commitment to properly care for their offspring means absolutely zilch in terms of whether or not gay couples can provide a loving, stable, nurturing environment for children (should they even choose to do so--we're talking marriage here, not raising families).
Besides, you can follow the lives of the children of homosexual couples. They are normal and well adjusted. You can't stop them raising their own kids if they choose-even if you can stop marriage.
Inasmuch as male and female genital intercourse involves every coordinated biological activity within the mated pair, including, though not limited to, the insemination and disposition of the male gametes near the female gametes, whereas female eggs do not fertilize nor is genetic information fused with other female eggs, nor can sperm fertilize with fecal germs, the male and female become a single reproductive system.
Or, if the man's sperm is not motile, or he suffered an orchidectomy, or the woman's fallopian tubes suffered damage, or she was simply born with too small a cervix, or has some disease where giving birth is highly problematic--your point becomes lost in the vast featureless forest of Moot. Male sperm cannot fertilize with saliva either, but even with heterosexual couples a lot of it ends up closer to tonsils than to the uterus.
Another thing, if marriage is merely about what two people make of it then why only two?
I think it's also worth mentioning (from a Christian perspective), is that Christ is concerned about the individual. On one instance, after He spared an adulterous woman from being stoned to death, He instructs her not to continue in sin. We as His followers are instructed to follow His example. If all He required from us is to be happy, then why should we influence people not to abuse illicit drugs?
These truths are knowable and understandable apart from religious authority. And if these activist judges were honest with themselves as well as conscientious, discerning law makers, they'd stop and ponder these truths instead of forcing their believes on the population. In order to secure the well-being of individuals and their communities, marriage must be recognized as an institution between one man and one woman EXCLUSIVELY.
No different than what gay activists have been doing. Whether you believe marriage is exclusively between a man and a woman or that matrimony is just a mere legal convention whose goal is to support an emotional bond, a belief about marriage cant help but be forced on others.
"No different than what gay activists have been doing. " You were wise to remove that, all right. No gay activist I know of has insisted you adopt a homosexual lifestyle or marry a gay lover.
And those of us who understand marriage as a union between one man and one woman aren't (nor have we ever) insisting homosexuals embrace heterosexuality or marry sombody of the opposite sex either.
Some insist homos embrace heterosexuality, but you're right, you're not forcing them into hetero marriage. You're just prohibiting them from enjoying the same benefits & privileges of sacramental marriage you take for granted. The state has no business in this matter, outside enforcing laws against bigamy, polygamy, & health codes. (Blood test, age requirements, incest, etc.) Those who prohibit wield just as much power as those who coerce. Your disclaimer don't get you off that easy.
If its no business of the state in this matter (i.e. marriage) then why prohibit bigamy, polygamy, or incest? Obviously you realize that such arrangements produce dire consequences against the well being of individuals and their communities which the state must secure. Your reaction doesnt surprise me since even a political liberal such as Joseph Raz acknowledges the importance of eschewing any attempt by government to achieve moral neutrality in regards to marriage.
Through genital intercourse, a male and a female unite bodily, and due to this bodily union, which does not occur in any other sex act (anal, oral, etc), a male and a female truly consummate their marriage. Male and female genital intercourse is truly distinctive from the only type of sex that can be performed by homosexuals.
Also, the entire copulation process between a male and a female in the act of mating is never affected by such conditions as sterility.
Never affected by sterility? What are you getting at here? Hundreds of thousands of people now walking the earth were conceived in petri dishes. Hundreds of thousands. It turns out that women actually can give birth without being married. Fact of nature, Eladral. What kind of name is that, anyway? Sounds like a Tolkien elf.
I am simply countering Liberals/Social Progressives charge that same-sex marriages are no less truly marriages than those of opposite sexes who happen to be infertile. The copulation process that occurs during male and female intercourse can never be affected by sterility; therefore, male and female intercourse is distinct from the only type of sex performed by homosexuals.
The sex acts (copulation process) performed by homosexual couples cannot be affected by sterility either. This is not a distinguishing characteristic. Obviously homosexual sex is not identical to heterosexual sex. For that matter, the missionary position is not identical to doggy style. Is the love between two homosexuals truly so radically different between the love of any heterosexual couple, that they should be denied the same privilege? THAT I don't see.
Firstly, the fact that sterility has no affect on homosexual sex is an obvious assessment and I, nor anybody on either side of the issue, have ever made such a charge, so your first argument is irrelevant.
@BlackBeltOfADDICTION haha also ur entire post made zero sence xD
XxXRawrMuahahaXxX 2 months ago
@BlackBeltOfADDICTION ha your funny, i NEVER said a was christian, so fix your eyes b4 u try soundin all smart
XxXRawrMuahahaXxX 2 months ago
God doesn't hate anything. When your saying god hates gays, your telling us that he lied, cause doesn't it say in the bible that god loves everything?
BoyPinup 2 months ago
@BlackBeltOfADDICTION \no true our numbers are now at 14 million up from 12 million. Homosexuality is made from perversion and not love. btw im only half white so i therefore cannot be in the inbreeded kkk. LOLOLOLOLOL
norseczar27 3 months ago
You are a disgrace to cholas and christians worldwide. You better get off YouTube before RayWilliamJohnson makes fun of you.
GigglesThatJiggles 3 months ago
I remember wen i lived in CA nd wen prop 8 came out nd I personally believe in gay marrage cuz ya kno wat, itz not everybody else's decision who u truly love in ur heart, same sex or not, nd if they wanna get married nd b happy, so b it
XxXRawrMuahahaXxX 3 months ago
I'm a Mormon and God made man and woman to be together to worship him and to make kids. Two men or two women cannot produce children. Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve and quit saying foo!
norseczar27 4 months ago
@norseczar27 some women are barren/have problems with fertility and some men have a low sperm count and cant have children, so the fact that two of the same sex cant produce is irrelevant. Homosexuality is found in tons of other species but homophobia is only found in one, us.
xxpoisenandkissesxx 3 months ago in playlist More videos from littleloca
i like the video and you seem like an awesome person, but i think its hillarious when you say "whatevers".
cristophershaffer 5 months ago
Hmm...so you are a Christian and you believe in God, yet you believe that the meaning of life is what ever comes to your mind?
Doesn't the Bible teach you that the meaning of life is the pursuit of absolution, and the preparation for the after life? (If you are part of the West Baptist Church forger what i said)
Hidframe 5 months ago
Yuh Sound Like A Country Girl Talkinng !.. HAA Cholas Dont Talk Like Thaat "FOO" lmao.
Cedesz7 6 months ago
WHATS GOOD LITTLE LOCA?!JUST WANTED TO DROP A FEW LINES I KNOW UR STEVIE N SHIT BUT ITS KOO I MUST ADMIT I DIG LITTLE LOCA OUTTA ALL UR CHARACTERS.SHES THE REALEST N WELL THE MOST FIRME CHULITA OUT THERE. LOL SHIT AFTER I SAW THAT BIEBER VIDEO..LMAO TRIPPED ME OUT PERO WHATEVERS CLEVER LITTLE LOCA TIGHT KEEP DOING IT UP..ALRATOZ
casperessj 7 months ago in playlist Loca Low Down
jesus also said, "Cast not your pearls before two legged pigs and give not what is Holy unto two legged dogs unless they trample them under their feet and tear your throat out.!", girl you have to judge what a two legged pig is, you have to judge what a two legged dog is, human sperm are living thinking spirit creatures, they do not belong being forced into human shit.! Fagots and lesbians are all God Damned human two legged pigs, "WORSE", MISS FOOL.! "THE COMPANION OF FOOLS WILL BE DESTROYED
mjconnollyIII 7 months ago
Haha that Ovenwater person is fuckin stupid
joeybooxo 7 months ago
Comment removed
ovenwater 7 months ago
Comment removed
ovenwater 7 months ago
@ovenwater
Do you know how hypocritical that is? When YOU find the one you love, YOU are going to want to marry them, just like a gay man/woman is going to want to marry their man/woman. When you find who you want to be with for the rest of your life, you're going to get married. So stfu and stop being a hypocrite.
DropItDownRaiseItUp 7 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Every study says a child a natural family is the ideal environment.How do children get male & womanhood bonding available only in a natural marriage?Saying marriage is a civil right is an insult to Dr. King & Malcolm X.Sodomy is not a civil right.Dr. Robert Spitzer, who got this off the list of mental diseases in the 1980's said 2001: "I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that's untrue some people can and do change"
BlackRepublican2010 8 months ago
@koriconprez We are already all sinners and deserve to go to hell so I don't think by a guy marrying a guy it's gonna be tht bad becuz even saying OMG is as bad as murdering someone
davisncavallo1 8 months ago
It is not our responsibility to judge. It is however our responsibility to live our lives to be a testimony to God. We are to be fishers of men. So no, we don't judge but we don't sit back and watch what grieves God.
koricanprez 8 months ago 2
You are right in that it is not our place to judge. You are wrong when you say the meaning f life is whatever you want it to be and whatever my brain wants it to be. No, I don't need other people to tell me what anything means. I have a brain and I have a heart of free will and with free will I have consequences. That is why I need the Bible. The Bible tells me what is right and what is wrong. The bible is all inclusive word of God. It is his instruction manual. (Basic Instructions Before Leavi
koricanprez 8 months ago
Religious people say that the bible said that marriage is between a woman and man. When if god didn't want gay, bisexual, lesbian, and transgender people to get marry why did he make us like this. Sadly to say i have lost faith in god in my heart because of what has been going on. And I am a 13 year old girl that is BISEXUAL and is afraid that they world would not except me. And one quick thing is that the ONLY difference between gay and straight people is that gay people like the same gender.
ExecutionEllie 9 months ago
The meaing of marriage and your divorce comment don't really make sense. Im sure you agree divorce is a horrible thing, and should be avoided by working out your problems if possible. You're saying people already took the meaning out of marriage. But by your implication, you're saying if this horrible epidemic(divorce) is on the rise it should be OK to have same sex marriage.
mytuber81 10 months ago
No one asked you to judge shawty. If you believe in Gods word then you would know it is YOUR responsibility to stand up for it's values. If the Bible says do not kill or rape or steal etc. and someone does one of those things to you or your loved one, you're not going to just sit back and say "Im not going to judge." Standing up for what is right is NOT judging.
mytuber81 10 months ago
Where do these religious people get off thinking they have a valid reason to deny a group of human beings their rights?! The richest country in the world momentarily went against on its own constitution and ethos, 'cos of a bunch of SELFISH people inflicting their agendas on others. Unlike my country with its multi-layered fragmented, loop-holes ridden "unwritten" constitution, the USA's is clear and straightforward. Please treat it with respect.
jerrypz 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Awesome find!!! Gay Iphone accessories
Type in your favorite search engine (allinaccessories2440 ebay store) Let's have a blast at white party this year. Visit the ebay store and thank you so much for your support.
Allinaccessories2440 1 year ago
holy shit!! are you a drag queen?
MALDITTOROKKERO 1 year ago
Glad that decision was stayed. Prop 8 is still on the books, lulz!
freakylocz14 1 year ago
Why limit marriage to two people?Threeway marriage should be legal.While the New Testament is more strict,Old Testament men were permitted multiple wives and sex slaves.I'm not kidding.We now call that human trafficking.
RykComerford 1 year ago
Little Loca lies because same sex marriages were recognized already as domestic partnerships and civil unions. Why try and change marriage just so homosexuals can feel better about themselves. If civil unions wren't fair than change laws concerning civil unions not change the definition of marriage which is specifically between a man and a woman. At the end of the day homosexuals will never be equal because they can't propogate without the opposite sex involved in some way shape or form.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
@feenin4u247 yet they didnt have the same rights
if they were the same, why not just get rid of marriage then?
idaman12345 1 year ago
That's so true god said never judge anyone cause every one is a sinner if ur not a sinner then judge, leave it to god to judge people
thebayarea95122 1 year ago
@thebayarea95122 that's not true. otherwise a human being couldn't make any judgments and EVERYONE makes prejudgments. Also God CLEARLY condemns homosexuality. We're not judging we're just restating what GOD has already passed judgment on. Those who don't repent of sexual immorality homosexuals and heterosexuals alike WILL face HELL FIRE. Those aren't my words those are God's words.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
@feenin4u247 i hope you dont consider the bible to be gods words
since they were written by man
so you are judging since god isnt real
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 THE BIBLE IS GODS WORD. There are many writers but one AUTHOR GOD. EVERYONE JUDGES on a daily basis all of man is programed to do so. What the Bible refers to judging is CONDEMNING SOMEONE TO HELL. I don't have that power people EVERY DAY choose to GO TO HELL BY HOLDING ON TO SIN they put themselves there. To reiterated GODS JUDGEMENTS IS NOT JUDGING.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
@thebayarea95122 GOD IS CLEAR ON HOMOSEXUALITY. To reiterate God's judgements is not JUDGING. Also the judging of the Bible as you are mentioning and mentioning out of CONTEXT refers to ETERNAL CONSEQUENCES not judging on a daily basis as God designed in ALL men to THINK WITH FREE WILL.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
God don't hate anyone.. he loves us just the way we are.. watch prayers for bobby.. till then stop talking shit people.. i believe u can be born gay!
JosephParamo 1 year ago
but shouldnt we be able to stand up for what we believe in?
commentsxonly 1 year ago
prop 8 was not just about marriage. they wanted to change the entire culture to suit homosexuals, only a small percentage of the population. they wanted to ban the term "mom and dad" and take away religious holidays.
commentsxonly 1 year ago
@commentsxonly they were not trying to ban the term "mom and dad" or take away religious holidays
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 ok, maybe not exactly like that, but they were trying to change the culture completley. it was so stupid. all that for marriage. COME ON PEOPLE. :)
commentsxonly 1 year ago
I think it's undemocratic what that judge did. He completely went against the voice of the majority. That's WRONG. I don't have an opinion on gay marriage. I really couldn't care less what people wanna do in their lives. I just wish the government would be EQUAL in giving power to the PEOPLE. Pisses me off.
SenhoritaIsabel 1 year ago
@SenhoritaIsabel votes don't matter any more.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
GAY is not the name but Homosexual, or Queer..
falcondan95705 1 year ago
I am aginst prop 8.In the bible it says we should not marry people of the same sex.I but god before anything
agus626 1 year ago
If you pray to god you pray to god. It doesn't matter. What matters it some of you haters are on here and can't even spell. You're called faggots. Leave the gays alone you homos
Chumpster1981 1 year ago
@Chumpster1981 The Prayers of the Wicked he does not hear....You can have the state recognize your maraige, but the people and the Church will not...
falcondan95705 1 year ago
Is this person a man or a chick or just an IT???
falcondan95705 1 year ago
HOMO IS HOMO!!! Queer or Faggot...... I don't describe them as gay since gay means Happy.... Say no to Diversity and Yes to UNITY!!!!
falcondan95705 1 year ago
@falcondan95705 gay also means homosexual male, look it up
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 So the Flintones were GAY???? In the song, Well have a gay old time?.. does that mean Barney was Porking Fred and Wilma was carpet munching on Wilma???.. I Think not... Let's face it... Gays are not Gay, they are Homosexuals... plain and simple...Queers is another good name meaning odd or strange...I prefer that... Fag is ok.. so is Pillow biter, butt pirate, rump rider, weenie suckers, hershey hiway haggs, etc....
falcondan95705 1 year ago
@falcondan95705 gay means many things
which includes homosexual male, and happy
the other ones you used were just derogatory and wrong
idaman12345 1 year ago
Read the Bible... Homosexuality is an enormous SIN!!!! Besides, being a queer is unnatural..If the meaning of life is hunting down fags, is that ok with you??? Not only that, but the mere thought turns my stomach...
falcondan95705 1 year ago
@falcondan95705 being gay is natural... seen in nature
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 If it is so Natural, then why can't a same sex couple reproduce?.. It is this lifestyle that brought AIDS...Some guy fing another in the ass and then sucking his tool sounds sick to me...Iran has the right idea don't you think???j There are no gays in Iran...
falcondan95705 1 year ago
@falcondan95705 actually look up the origins of aids
youll note that it came from monkeys, not gays
idaman12345 1 year ago
Read the Bible... Homosexuality is an enormous SIN!!!! Besides, being a queer is unnatural..If the meaning of life is hunting down fags, is that ok with you???
falcondan95705 1 year ago
What's with the fake accent, is this your audition tape?
pwnUgood 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God hates gays above all other kinds of "sinners" and homosexuality should be a capital crime!!
Bigjohnnywad 1 year ago
they are making it illegal to love.
misschic007 1 year ago
wise words, sista, wise words! : )))
bigsteakjoe 1 year ago
You go, GIRLFRIEND!!
prismstar23 1 year ago
AMEN! I'm Christian but I wouldn't judge them, that is more wrong :)
ryeolee 1 year ago
LOL I agree with you!
OpalEl 1 year ago
Exactly Girl!
italiancherrywine 1 year ago
WATCH MY HILARIOUS PROP 8 VIDEO! (sexy strip dance too!)
/watch?v=T8eh5MkZwcQ
*be sure to subscribe and like the video*
DillonCallaway 1 year ago
I live in ARIZONA, but I'm glad it's overturned.
andy32capp 1 year ago
Love you Little Loca. You've always been the best. Thanks for sticking up for all people out there. Also, girl, you've got the greatest lipstick ever.
drooski 1 year ago
I love you gurl.. :D
ReiZkeNx 1 year ago
i spoke too soon.
chadinterrupted 1 year ago
Comment removed
chadinterrupted 1 year ago
Comment removed
chadinterrupted 1 year ago
I love your opinion. Course, it matches my own and i tend to like people who agree with my own opinions.
phoenixrising25 1 year ago
I support freedom for all. And to deny one group from freedom is a stain on the American Constitution. I agree with the judge on that basis, however, what i don't agree with is the judge's statement (Quote)"Arguing against gay marriage is inarticulate" (End Quote).
Let me be as articulate as i can be. I believe in god, and god made a Man & Woman, when they come together in marriage it's called holy matrimony, and then they create offspring, a family.
That is the real purpose of marriage.
MrJay429 1 year ago
sad day !!! we the people again do not have the right to choose what kinda of state we live in. the minority ruling the majority. wake up american its happing everyday you are losing rights daily
LIGHTSOUTFOOLS 1 year ago
@LIGHTSOUTFOOLS as compared to the majority ruling over the minority?
equal rights were given back when prop h8 was overturned
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 no, when it was over turn the govt. said you have no right to live by the laws we as a people wanted. at that point it is not for the people by the people. we all have the same rights, you just want to change them to suit you.thats not equal thats special rights.the states make they laws, by the people for the people. not the liberal hilter want to bes.
LIGHTSOUTFOOLS 1 year ago
@LIGHTSOUTFOOLS you claim we have equal rights yet homosexuals cannot marry
That's not equal
idaman12345 1 year ago
happy gay day, all this means is that your vote means nothing! The world was destroy once because of gays
suckafree1973 1 year ago
@suckafree1973 Prove that one. It doesn' t mean your vote doesn't count, what it means is that the constitution of the united states counts, and ignorant, hateful, bigoted people can't just makes laws and rules and regulations unfairly to control other people. It stops people who are hateful and ignorant from making laws and rules based on ignorance. It protect people from people like you.
Now gay people are just a little more free than they were. GOD FORBID people don't live just like you!
Mglosk 1 year ago
@Mglosk 75 million voted against gay marriage and one gay judge can over turn that? whats the purpose. And i don't have to prove shit it already was written.
suckafree1973 1 year ago
Now that Prop 8 overturned, what's next?
Ok so excuse my ignorance, but now that Prop 8 overturned gays can marry right?
This is my question, does this mean they can marry "civilly"(civil marriage), or does this also mean that they can marry through church as well?
You see, that's my only problem;gay marriage in church.
I don't dislike gays at all and I don't have a problem with them getting married civilly but in church? I don't know about that.
Can anyone help me please.
DYE9 1 year ago
@DYE9 Members of the church will NOT be forced to perform gay marriage ceremonies unless they want to, nor will they be forced to honor gay marriage or change their beliefs. The only thing this affects is who gets a legal marriage license.
yuumeko 1 year ago
I <3 you.
Fireheartl 1 year ago
i'm feeling you in this video... =)
ctina1980 1 year ago
"Maybe you need to look at you fool."
LOVE IT.
demsorbust 1 year ago
i dont really care about gay marriage. the only thing that bugs me about prop 8 is the fact that the mormons are being blamed, and i believe that a child deserves a mom and a dad.
commentsxonly 1 year ago
@commentsxonly "and i believe that a child deserves a mom and a dad. " ok but wat about them kids in 3rd world countrys who doen't have a mom nor a dad. do u think its better for them not to have anyone to take care of them, whether then to let a same sex couple taking care of them? think about it, 2 dads or 2 moms is better than nobody. is not like we steal them kids off their parents and raise them. we adopt kids who doen't have a home.
jieqiren89 1 year ago
@jieqiren89 yes, i do think that they should be able to adopt children from third world countries, just not getting sperm donors and all that.
commentsxonly 1 year ago
@commentsxonly theres a reason for the most part that mormons are being blamed
the fact that cult illegally donated to prop h8 for starters
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 wth its not a cult. theyre standing up for the family, something really important to them. i want gays to stand up for their rights, as they should. but mormons should be allowed to stand up for theirs.
commentsxonly 1 year ago
I LOVE YOU.
wetdream09 1 year ago
All of the United States knows what Prop 8 is. Not just California haha. I'm actually surprised that over 70% of California is against it. California is SOCIALLY a liberal state. Theres huge communities for gays. I actually read that a lot of gays voted for it. If you Google "gays against gay marriage" you will find several articles and I think theres a website founded by a gay, dedicated to the protest against gay marriage. To me marriage is just a legal document.
EvoSpx 1 year ago
DAM RIGHT GURL! i hellaa agree with u!
let ppl live their own dam lives nd leave em alone!
SmileybaybeO7 1 year ago
lol
066kimbo 1 year ago
I definitly agree! [:
urbabygirl4993 1 year ago
I SAY YES ON PROP 8 HOMO'S NEED TO STOP CRYING THE PEOPLE VOTED AND VOTED NO ON GAY MARRIAGE SO WHATS THE PROBLEM??
hurleyOC 1 year ago
@hurleyOC since when do minority rights get voted on by a majority
idaman12345 1 year ago
love it loca
3344jade 1 year ago
We dont live in a democracy
GoHardMG 1 year ago
I agree with everything you just said. Get your own stuff together before you criticize someone else.
Besides that, if the sanctity of marriage is so important, then why is divorce legal?
I voted AGAINST Prop 8, and I was raised Christian, too.
Love for EVERYBODY!!!
yourfuturequeen 1 year ago
you know what, the people in California voted. This is a democracy fool.
Freemasonry 1 year ago
@Freemasonry In a democracy, people don't get to decide who gets rights and who doesn't. It will be rescinded.
REman07 1 year ago
These are my real opinions on Prop 8 homie.
Obviously the effect of Prop 8 on my real life friends away from YouTube has an impact on my opinions, but it only makes them stronger, not different.
littleloca 1 year ago
girl so could i ask you something
so everything you do is a script ?
do you really belive in abstinance?
because when i watch your videos
they seem so real && i want to
thank you cause when i was having some tough days last wekk your videos made me feel better
marcoj25 1 year ago
If you have sex before you are 18 then you are gambling with your health and your future. Even if you are lucky enough not to lose, you still don't win anything.
No one who loved you would ask you to risk everything.
Abstinence is what the smart players practice.
littleloca 1 year ago
@littleloca
would using protection supercede dangering ones health?
chetdog 1 year ago
@chetdog No protection is 100% effective. Only taking personal responsability for our own actions allows us to endanger our own health.
littleloca 1 year ago
@littleloca
how far you get in school?
chetdog 1 year ago
You, my friend, is amazing.
I love LittleLoca. Wooo!
Crim3Stopp3rs 1 year ago
I like the character. LittleLoca is sooooooo sexy!!!
If you were my girl, I'd make you talk like that in bed.
pepelapiu2004 1 year ago
Y Is All Ur Vids Black Nd White
xXxLillyXAliviaxXx 1 year ago
Back in 2006 the only way to get a sharp image on YouTube was to post in back and white.
YouTube has HQ and HD now, but black and white has become a littleloca theme.
littleloca 1 year ago
I'm not a lesbian, but I think marriage is between two people- love is LOVE.
Who is ANYONE to tell someone who they can and cannot love?!
BlueJeanBaby012 1 year ago 2
whooooo gurrrl ! preach honeyy ! us gay guys thank you for standing up homegurl !
gagabby90 2 years ago 2
God Bless You.
Chief1Apache 2 years ago 2
HOLLA, get em loca
whysored 2 years ago 2
all i think about that is we are no one to judge
xtanyafx 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Gay marriage is a violation of the Constitution of the United States of America. Mainly the 5th Amendment, which says a wife cannot testify against her husband and a husband cannot testify against his wife, because that would be the same as, "Self incrimination", which is a violation of the Constitution. Clearly the 5th Amendment is talking about a man and a woman. So Gay marriage falls under moral responsibility and not legal in the United States of America.
puritianB 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure people should not take a bicentennial document that defined black people as only 3/5ths of a human being and use it to decide our modern civil rights issues. Even if that argument was infallible, does it mean the constitution shouldn't be changed? Does it mean our separation of church and state shouldn't have changed over the last few centuries? How about our justice system- should we go back to the judge-jury-executioner days of the sheriff, or preserve our modern understanding
Jeskimely 2 years ago
of a "right to a speedy trial"? Remember, people: the days when these laws were considered constitutional was back when a lot of the Constitution's framers were still alive. So, yeah, maybe gay marriage isn't a constitutional right. But neither was bi-racial marriage. The spirit of the Constitution is what's important, not the initial intent, PuritianB.
Jeskimely 2 years ago
i dnt think ppl should judge...that is all
Bluechikk27 2 years ago
Yay lil loca knows wassup
coolguy852 2 years ago
Agreed. Gay marriage doesn't hurt anyone, doesn't effect anyones lives except for those in the marriage... so why take their rights away? They're American's and human beings, why don't they deserve equal rights just like everyone else?
TarissaFerg 2 years ago 24
@TarissaFerg Their rights weren't taken away to begin with. Any gay man can marry any woman they chose before and any lesbian can marry any man they chose because marriage is between a man and a woman. It is sad that in order for homosexuals to feel important that they have to step on marriage for everyone else. If Domestic Partnerships were not fair than change those laws not marriage.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
@feenin4u247 yes but unlike heterosexuals, homosexuals cannot marry the person they love
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 that's because marriage by definition is between a man and a woman just LIKE OSMOSIS by definition is EXCLUSIVELY the diffusion of WATER.
feenin4u247 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm all for gay marriage...."as long as both chicks are hot"
shirleygarrido 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gay folk can get married over here in south nj :)
vogueADDICTx0 2 years ago
gay folk can get married over here in south nj :)
vogueADDICTx0 2 years ago
y iiz all yur viids an piikz white an black?
but yur realii pretty foo :)
boohoobiatch2012 2 years ago
This video made me love you! i added you on myspace :]
Eivan10R 2 years ago
soo truee!!! i think the same way u know ..each person has their own lives to live it ain't perfect and last thing people should do is get in others pplz buisness!!!!
sourcandyyumz 2 years ago 8
Amen loca
SanguinaryAnima 2 years ago 3
OMG LOVE YOU!
TheMhunky 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's very simple people vote on their beliefs and sense of morality. Us christians vote on our beliefs which is marriage is between a man and a woman (Romans 1: 24-27, 1 Corinthians 6: 9-10, Jude 1: 7). Just as a bigamist cant get married to more then one wife, because the laws of the people said it's not a acceptable lifestyle. Us followers of Christ will continue to vote that which reflects our values and beliefs, just as you will do the same. I am not against civil unions by the way.
Followers4christ 2 years ago
Divorce rate [and abuse rate] is lower in gay couples. Comparing same-sex marriages to people marrying trees/rocks/animals is kind of retarded. That doesn't even make sense. PEOPLE should have the right to marry WHOMEVER they choose [as long as they're of consent, obviously], because MARRIAGE = LOVE. Marriage is not about gender. BTW -- Pagans instituted the whole marriage thing before the Christians stole it.
Gunslingerx0 2 years ago 17
@Gunslingerx0 Thank you! A lot of people don't know that prior to the middle ages, the church viewed marriage as a dirty, earthly institution. I find it ironic that nowadays, churches are putting more money than ever into keeping this dirty little secret to themselves, and at the same time trying to limit the spread of happiness. It's totally flipped.
Iwannabubbletube 1 year ago
@Gunslingerx0 I love my mom so I'm going to marry my mom. I love her.
Sirafrican 1 year ago
u r so right Loca!
LipsOfALovelyGirl 2 years ago
Go on 0:53 its funny
MegaDontforgetthis 2 years ago
luv ur lip liner!!!!!!
809TheMorenita 2 years ago
I totally agree with you! thank you!
lilpipsqueakxd 2 years ago
Thirdly Pasha582, though a man and a woman are individuals, during mating, they unite bodily. So, it is more realistic to acknowledge that the whole process of copulation, involving as it does the brains of the man and woman, their nerves, blood, vaginal and other secretions, and coordinated biological activity does not occur during any other sex act other than male and female genital intercourse. Truly, a male and female consummate (i.e. complete) their marriage through sex.
eladral 2 years ago
Though a man & man are individuals, during mating they unite bodily. Some positions unite them more bodily than heterosexuals can. Two lesbians get each other's vaginal juices flowing, and consummate (i.e. complete) their marriage through the act of sympatric sexual intercourse. Their nerves tingle, and their blood flows, angels weep tears of joy, and heterosexual voyeurs, if they are present, praise God. The love people share is a beautiful thing. There is little enough joy in our world.
pasha582 2 years ago
Just as the mouth, esophagus, small intestine, anus, etc. are individual parts that function and form a single digestive system (and certain other parts function and form the respiratory system, or circulatory system, etc.), a male and a female are individuals who possess the essential parts to become a single reproductive principle (even though reproduction may not result).
eladral 2 years ago
And the biological ability to reproduce has precisely what to do with the social institution of marriage?
pasha582 2 years ago
It's not so much the ability to reproduce, but the truth of the matter... that a man's sexual organ and a woman's sexual organ are complementary. Were the state to recognize one form of non-bodily unifying arrangement as marital, then no reason would exist not to limit marital status to any other form of arrangement... being able to marry a tree, rock, or alligator. This would place an unnecessary burden on the courts as well as jeopardize the welfare of individuals and communities.
eladral 2 years ago
I see no reason a man should not be able to marry a tree or a rock, provided the tree or rock is of lawful age and can evince informed consent through signing a marriage license. Same goes true for alligators, cows, or any other critter from which one might make a pair of shoes.
As I don't see that happening any time soon, I don't reckon there will be much more burden on the courts and communities than there are with religious zealots attacking gays.
pasha582 2 years ago
that made me LOL, "I see no reason a man should not be able to marry a tree or a rock, provided the tree or rock is of lawful age" :P:P:P:P
MissElisePlease 2 years ago
Secondly Pasha582, and again, unlike the female anatomy, no area on the male anatomy functions as an emission receptor. The male sexual reproductive organ and the female sexual reproductive organ are complementary due to the fact that theyre sexual reproductive organs (just as the mouth, esophagus, small intestine, and anus are a part of the digestive system, while certain other parts belong to the circulatory system, or respiratory system, etc).
eladral 2 years ago
Humans routinely do things they wern't designed to do. Eg you can wear a wrist watch. Your arm wasn't made to accommodate a watch--instead the watch is fashioned to fit your wrist. From what I gather you're saying we shouldn't do something we can do because our parts weren't "designed" to do it. Strikes me as utterly irrelevant.
pasha582 2 years ago
Youre comparing, as well as confusing, a crucial social issue such as marriage with something as negligible and irrelevant as wrist watch wearing. Also, this get each others vaginal juices flowing is specious reasoning, at best, when compared against the whole of the copulation process between a male and a female. This vaginal juices flowing is, again, a means to some other end. It does not unite two women more than heterosexual sex.
eladral 2 years ago
A crucial social issue? Have homosexuals lived together in ages past? Yes. Do they today? Yes. Do gay couples enjoy legal right to marry in other nations? Yes. Do those couples threaten the institution of marriage or the rights of others in those countries? No. The whole M/F sex process is specious reasoning compared to the social institution of marriage. Why this focus on sexual mechanics? There are lesbian couples far happier than many hetero pairings. Why oppress them as you do?
pasha582 2 years ago
Decades of culturally supported fatherless homes which have wreaked havoc on the black community prove marriage isnt malleable to suit the subjective goals of individuals, couples, or groups.
eladral 2 years ago
Just because your black hetero dads lack commitment to properly care for their offspring means absolutely zilch in terms of whether or not gay couples can provide a loving, stable, nurturing environment for children (should they even choose to do so--we're talking marriage here, not raising families).
Besides, you can follow the lives of the children of homosexual couples. They are normal and well adjusted. You can't stop them raising their own kids if they choose-even if you can stop marriage.
pasha582 2 years ago
Comment removed
eladral 2 years ago
Inasmuch as male and female genital intercourse involves every coordinated biological activity within the mated pair, including, though not limited to, the insemination and disposition of the male gametes near the female gametes, whereas female eggs do not fertilize nor is genetic information fused with other female eggs, nor can sperm fertilize with fecal germs, the male and female become a single reproductive system.
eladral 2 years ago
Or, if the man's sperm is not motile, or he suffered an orchidectomy, or the woman's fallopian tubes suffered damage, or she was simply born with too small a cervix, or has some disease where giving birth is highly problematic--your point becomes lost in the vast featureless forest of Moot. Male sperm cannot fertilize with saliva either, but even with heterosexual couples a lot of it ends up closer to tonsils than to the uterus.
pasha582 2 years ago
Another thing, if marriage is merely about what two people make of it then why only two?
I think it's also worth mentioning (from a Christian perspective), is that Christ is concerned about the individual. On one instance, after He spared an adulterous woman from being stoned to death, He instructs her not to continue in sin. We as His followers are instructed to follow His example. If all He required from us is to be happy, then why should we influence people not to abuse illicit drugs?
eladral 2 years ago
interessting vid :D
and your make-up is incredible funny
graceleia 2 years ago
WELL FiRST OF ALL iM Bi..SO PPL SHOULD REALLY SHUT UP D K NO GAY MARRiAGE OR WATEVERz & DNT WRRY BOUT NO BODY ELSE PERO TU MiSMO :]
gatita213 2 years ago
These truths are knowable and understandable apart from religious authority. And if these activist judges were honest with themselves as well as conscientious, discerning law makers, they'd stop and ponder these truths instead of forcing their believes on the population. In order to secure the well-being of individuals and their communities, marriage must be recognized as an institution between one man and one woman EXCLUSIVELY.
eladral 2 years ago
YOU are forcing your beliefs on others. I can see this video flew completely over your head.
pasha582 2 years ago
Comment removed
eladral 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No different than what gay activists have been doing. Whether you believe marriage is exclusively between a man and a woman or that matrimony is just a mere legal convention whose goal is to support an emotional bond, a belief about marriage cant help but be forced on others.
eladral 2 years ago
"No different than what gay activists have been doing. " You were wise to remove that, all right. No gay activist I know of has insisted you adopt a homosexual lifestyle or marry a gay lover.
pasha582 2 years ago
And those of us who understand marriage as a union between one man and one woman aren't (nor have we ever) insisting homosexuals embrace heterosexuality or marry sombody of the opposite sex either.
eladral 2 years ago
Some insist homos embrace heterosexuality, but you're right, you're not forcing them into hetero marriage. You're just prohibiting them from enjoying the same benefits & privileges of sacramental marriage you take for granted. The state has no business in this matter, outside enforcing laws against bigamy, polygamy, & health codes. (Blood test, age requirements, incest, etc.) Those who prohibit wield just as much power as those who coerce. Your disclaimer don't get you off that easy.
pasha582 2 years ago
If its no business of the state in this matter (i.e. marriage) then why prohibit bigamy, polygamy, or incest? Obviously you realize that such arrangements produce dire consequences against the well being of individuals and their communities which the state must secure. Your reaction doesnt surprise me since even a political liberal such as Joseph Raz acknowledges the importance of eschewing any attempt by government to achieve moral neutrality in regards to marriage.
eladral 2 years ago
Through genital intercourse, a male and a female unite bodily, and due to this bodily union, which does not occur in any other sex act (anal, oral, etc), a male and a female truly consummate their marriage. Male and female genital intercourse is truly distinctive from the only type of sex that can be performed by homosexuals.
Also, the entire copulation process between a male and a female in the act of mating is never affected by such conditions as sterility.
eladral 2 years ago
Never affected by sterility? What are you getting at here? Hundreds of thousands of people now walking the earth were conceived in petri dishes. Hundreds of thousands. It turns out that women actually can give birth without being married. Fact of nature, Eladral. What kind of name is that, anyway? Sounds like a Tolkien elf.
pasha582 2 years ago
I am simply countering Liberals/Social Progressives charge that same-sex marriages are no less truly marriages than those of opposite sexes who happen to be infertile. The copulation process that occurs during male and female intercourse can never be affected by sterility; therefore, male and female intercourse is distinct from the only type of sex performed by homosexuals.
eladral 2 years ago
The sex acts (copulation process) performed by homosexual couples cannot be affected by sterility either. This is not a distinguishing characteristic. Obviously homosexual sex is not identical to heterosexual sex. For that matter, the missionary position is not identical to doggy style. Is the love between two homosexuals truly so radically different between the love of any heterosexual couple, that they should be denied the same privilege? THAT I don't see.
pasha582 2 years ago
Firstly, the fact that sterility has no affect on homosexual sex is an obvious assessment and I, nor anybody on either side of the issue, have ever made such a charge, so your first argument is irrelevant.
eladral 2 years ago