mash'allah this recitation is absolutely beautiful!!!!!!!
Deedat laid the SOLID foundation for Shabir & Dr. Zakir & others to continue to build. They ALL deserve our love & respect al7amdulellah Allah gave them all to us in OUR time to learn from!!!
It is sad to see that people argue about Deedat and Gilcrist debate and, clearly, shows that the importance for them reside in marking points and destroying the other. Listening at such an interesting discussion where respect and peaceful way of adressing each other, the speakers give a perfect example of what is the right way of exchanging view points, even if they differ. it's sad to see the conduct of some people wanting to make it a debate where one destroy the other
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh its clear why that debate between Gilchrist and Deedat isnt available. Deedat got destroyed! If he did well in that debate it would have been on YouTube just like the Swaggart debate. Which I dont think he did a good job with either.
wow an honest christian..nice. really refreshing after i hear these new gen arrogant liar debaters like david wood etc. i am sure all the Christians in the audience r scratching the heads.. cause they were waiting to hear 911 twin towers saddam hossein etc...
xiaahmad: if you listened to the video Gilchrist - he openly admitted he was ignorant when he debated Ahmed Deedat. As for Ahmed Deedat - he has no formal education in Islam, I'd sooner listen to Shabir Ally give a lecture all day about Islam; Shabir Ally is an intellectual giant when compared to Ahmed Deedat who simply resorted to ignorance of Christianity and appeals to the popularity of the audience - just listen to Deedat's explanation of the Trinity as the best example of his ignorance
The problem I find with Deedat is he used rhetoric and misrepresentation rather than facts. Shabir Ally I prefer because he does't belittle his opponent, sticks to the facts and thus leaves very little wiggle room for the opponent to then claim he wasn't given a fair go. When he does see a flaw in opponents the argument rather than resorting to childish rhetoric he gives his opponent to explain them self.
mash'allah this recitation is absolutely beautiful!!!!!!!
Deedat laid the SOLID foundation for Shabir & Dr. Zakir & others to continue to build. They ALL deserve our love & respect al7amdulellah Allah gave them all to us in OUR time to learn from!!!
klnadal 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anyone trying to foist a politically correct peaceful reading of the koran, is flying in the face of all the evidence.
i urge you to read the koran for yourself.
below are 2 sites that point out all the violent elements.
one is an annotated reading of the entire koran
the second is a critique of just about avery issue that you would want to pursue.
join-up:
w----ww.skepticsannotatedbible .co-----m/quran/2/index.ht----m
ht----tp://ww......w.inthenam eofallah.or-----g/Definitions. ht---ml
catveezle 1 year ago
Very candid discussion by Mr.Gilchrist
nabz11354 1 year ago
Salam alaikum,
It is sad to see that people argue about Deedat and Gilcrist debate and, clearly, shows that the importance for them reside in marking points and destroying the other. Listening at such an interesting discussion where respect and peaceful way of adressing each other, the speakers give a perfect example of what is the right way of exchanging view points, even if they differ. it's sad to see the conduct of some people wanting to make it a debate where one destroy the other
muslimahca 2 years ago
beautiful recitation. SubhanAllah!! Masha'Allah!!
AdamAlScoti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh its clear why that debate between Gilchrist and Deedat isnt available. Deedat got destroyed! If he did well in that debate it would have been on YouTube just like the Swaggart debate. Which I dont think he did a good job with either.
Nakdimon316 2 years ago
beautiful recitation. SubhanAllah. Do any of you know his name? I would like to hear more of his recitation.
Oo786oO 2 years ago 5
the muslim brother at the begining did a beautiful recitation masha'Allah
pillgrimz 2 years ago 7
wow an honest christian..nice. really refreshing after i hear these new gen arrogant liar debaters like david wood etc. i am sure all the Christians in the audience r scratching the heads.. cause they were waiting to hear 911 twin towers saddam hossein etc...
cfrb 2 years ago
Praise to God, I've been waiting for a new Shabir Ally video to be posted..Been some time since the last one..Thanks!!
Acxxman 2 years ago
John gilchrist was pawned by Ahmed Deedat :)
xiaahmad 2 years ago
anywhere on the internet to see it?
mannypatel1 2 years ago
No I was talking about
that he use to come in deedat lecutres can he dont even dare to ask question from deedat :D
and when Deedat passed away they try to act as champions
xiaahmad 2 years ago
o i though u ment they debated.
yes lots of christians act like they can handle deedat in debate but it is not true
mannypatel1 2 years ago 3
Correct
Its like challenging tyson to fight when he is death!!
christains claim to win against deedat coz he cant defend him self now
RefutingCP 2 years ago 3
yh, lol some of em only dare to speak after his death, may Allah have mercy on him amen.
Oo786oO 2 years ago 2
xiaahmad: if you listened to the video Gilchrist - he openly admitted he was ignorant when he debated Ahmed Deedat. As for Ahmed Deedat - he has no formal education in Islam, I'd sooner listen to Shabir Ally give a lecture all day about Islam; Shabir Ally is an intellectual giant when compared to Ahmed Deedat who simply resorted to ignorance of Christianity and appeals to the popularity of the audience - just listen to Deedat's explanation of the Trinity as the best example of his ignorance
kawaiigardiner 2 years ago
thing is Deedat beat Gilchrist
and now shabir Ally did that
yeh I agree that Shabir Ally is like next level of Deedat but Deedat was good and was one of best of his time and inspired many ppl
xiaahmad 2 years ago 3
RE: xiaahmad
The problem I find with Deedat is he used rhetoric and misrepresentation rather than facts. Shabir Ally I prefer because he does't belittle his opponent, sticks to the facts and thus leaves very little wiggle room for the opponent to then claim he wasn't given a fair go. When he does see a flaw in opponents the argument rather than resorting to childish rhetoric he gives his opponent to explain them self.
kawaiigardiner 2 years ago
Thank you! Where did you get these from?
YahyahayderSeymour 2 years ago