@Thometheious Because I'm sure you're an amazing driver. With no evidence leading up to the situation, it's pretty asinine of you to immediately assume it was utter lack-of-talent that resulted in the crash. Could've had a deer run in front of him and cause him to swerve, could've been the fault of another motorist. People shouldn't post biased, subjective drivel just because they have a keyboard in front of them.
@weaverracing96 If you hit a deer at 70 MPH that wouldn't happen, now if you hit a deer at 130 mph you blame the driver;) I'm guessing he isn't here to defend himself:(
@XfireBlake Read what I said, 'had a deer run in front of him and cause him to swerve', never said he hit a deer rather that he lost control trying to avoid a deer, or anything else, and hit a tree, pole, guardrail edge, etc
looks better?!?!?!?!?! ill take a 88-98 GTR over that new shit any day
harold123sk8 2 months ago
this makes me sad... that is all
sgBT182 2 months ago
rear lights are ok.. not that bad ^_^
satansoul 4 months ago
its ok people its a r35 get p.oed when its a r34
harold123sk8 5 months ago
@harold123sk8 only problem is that r35 is much faster and way more beautiful than ur crap r34 dumb.
Mices71 2 months ago
i dnt think thats a GTR no more...?
skate123AN 5 months ago
so much for that world class handling huh
Jharp82 6 months ago
@Jharp82 No matter how good a car handles, if you give it to an idiot he will crash it. In other words don't blame the car.
PSNLIVE2 4 months ago
well here are some points
1 This car was wrecked at high speed ---driver
2 This car was rolled ----driver
3 thats not biased, thats the facts
redrumredrum89 6 months ago
obviously somebody didnt know how to control a super car at high speeds, hate to see grow-up toys in babys hands
Thometheious 1 year ago
@Thometheious Because I'm sure you're an amazing driver. With no evidence leading up to the situation, it's pretty asinine of you to immediately assume it was utter lack-of-talent that resulted in the crash. Could've had a deer run in front of him and cause him to swerve, could've been the fault of another motorist. People shouldn't post biased, subjective drivel just because they have a keyboard in front of them.
weaverracing96 6 months ago
@weaverracing96 If you hit a deer at 70 MPH that wouldn't happen, now if you hit a deer at 130 mph you blame the driver;) I'm guessing he isn't here to defend himself:(
XfireBlake 5 months ago
@XfireBlake Read what I said, 'had a deer run in front of him and cause him to swerve', never said he hit a deer rather that he lost control trying to avoid a deer, or anything else, and hit a tree, pole, guardrail edge, etc
weaverracing96 5 months ago
@weaverracing96 That settles it! Never swerve for a deer, just brake hard and hope for the best! swerving always make it worse!
XfireBlake 5 months ago
Their you go. Give an idiot a fast car and thats what you get
OwiuX 1 year ago 12
@OwiuX There*
mattdrummer620 5 months ago
@mattdrummer620 Thank you mr autocorrect
OwiuX 5 months ago