Added: 2 years ago
From: inlookingout
Views: 1,547
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • McCain is a traitor to the troops.

  • @Sebbo2524 he's worse than that dude, he's a THREAT to America's security. he's so backward and ignorant. I thought they served under the will of the American people? 75% of Americans support the repeal. 70% of service members in the military including their families is okay on openly gays in the military. McCain is purely a bigot, and in the wrong side of history. He will be in line with Sen. McCarthy, his fellow Repub.

  • Because public sexuality is anarchy.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne really? even heterosexuality is anarchy? hahahahahahhahaha if that's true? where that it happens? :)

  • Just because we have tolerated evil does not mean that we can no longer stand up to it and defeat it. We must never "tolerate" evil or crime. We must not "tolerate" dishonesty.

    Your amoral argument is uncompelling and leads to moral nihilism and anarchy. Anarchy does not work. Anarchy always brings about order.

  • Okay ToxicOdiousOne, how in the world can Homosexuals lead to anarchy in our country?

  • What is the difference between sex and sexuality though? Aren't these interchangable? If we prohibit one don't we prohibit both? If public sex is illegal shouldn't gay and lesbian advertisments which promote public sexuality? What about public displays of affection? Shouldn't this making out be prohibited by all. Should women only bare clevage to their lovers? It's a thought.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne There has been a double standard around this since the beginning. Straight soldiers and sailors display pictures of their wives and husbands. They wear wedding bans. Any military person 30 years or older who has never been married is suspected of being gay. Fellow service men ask about girl friends. Failing to have a girl friend also draws attention and suspicion. Thats a thought too.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne

    i am happy to inform you that public opinion is rapidly becoming more acceptable gays and lesbians. they're queer, they're here, get used to it! most everyone else is.

  • @RottingintheMidwest So we change a great policy that has served us well because of polling? That's just not a compelling reason to change a great working military policy.

    Are you from some radical sodomite organization? Ho w about you keep your sexuality to yourself like everybody else. Sex is not public!!!!

  • @ToxicOdiousOne

    why are you not asking heterosexuals to keep their sexuality private as well? and before you blather bullshit, no, heterosexuals are not keeping their sexuality private. anytime someone mentions their significant other, they are "expressing their sexuality". the bigots (you) only make a fuss out of it when when it is a same sex relationship.

  • What part of sex is private is eluding you Sir? The military does not exist for sexual diversity it exists to fight wars and to protect freedoms not invent new freedoms without our government's approval. You follow directives of our government you don't just disregard the government whose freedoms you take an oath to defend. To disrespect our government angers me. For in doing so you have disrespected every American.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne

    umm... are you mentally retarded?

  • I remind us of the great principal that sex is private. You question this wisdom by asking if I am unintelligent? Why? Sex has been private for centuries. Why cause trouble now making sex public and able to be objected to?

  • @ToxicOdiousOne

    no one is suggesting people be permitted to have sex in public. so sex will remain in private with permitting gays to serve openly in the military. why are you incapable of noting the difference between sexual orientation and sexual activity?

  • @RottingintheMidwest

    I am guessing Toxic is under 18 years old. He seems to be struggling with his own sexual identity. He also seems to be spouting off FOX news propaganda.

  • "He seems to be struggling with his own sexual identity."

    Says the queer. You know gays telling straights that they are just confused is quite ironic. I am not confused or going through a phase. I know you might tell your queer son this when he wants to date girls, but I'm not queer.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne is mis using the term "ironic". It is a subtle distinction. What I find ironic is that he says he is not confused nor going through a phase, yet he is a self proclaimed homophobic person. He calls me queer, but suggests I have a son, who is also queer, who wants to date girls...imagine in your head the sound that Scooby makes when Shaggy says something very confusing. That is the sound I would like to make right now.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne The military exists to fight wars and protect the U.S. from attack. Gay and Straight Marines have been doing this since November 10, 1775. The removal of DADT will not increase or decrease the number of gays serving in the military. They are already there. They will continue to be there regardless of the decision of Congress. You have so many FOX news inspired thoughts. You really need to get out more often.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne Integrating the military wasn't too popular either. If you do not want to serve in a military that does not require gays to lie, (they will still have to hide their orientation in order not to get ostracized by the homophobic members of their units), then don't join the military. Meanwhile, the rest of the Nation has been living in the 21st century along side gay people. Only self hating fags like yourself seem to think everyone around them is straight.

  • @RottingintheMidwest I AGREE with ya, whether you like it or not. GAYS are alive here in America! If you dont like it, GO. Fly to the moon. No one wants you and your hateful brain here. You dont deserve to be American!

  • @ToxicOdiousOne you are sick closeted homo. Be out and be PROUD, dont spew HATE and INJUSTICE here in Youtube. Grow up man. lol

  • No sexual orientation quotas. No sexual diversity. Why is government enforcing diversity? Isn't it the employer's decision about who they hire?

  • "Isn't it the employer's decision about who they hire?"

    Not employers paid for by the Federal Government who in turn are paid by tax payers and voters. Much to your dismay ToxicOdiousOne, Gays & Lesbians pay their taxes, and vote.

  • @jusitke07 When the stock holders of a company make a decision that effects hiring policy, the employer makes the change. The majority of taxpayers have been accepting of gays serving in the military for several years. Now even upper management is in favor of gays serving in the military. Of course, there will always be the minority view, the disgruntled janitors in the company. But fortunately, the company rarely listens to the advice of its janitors when setting the policy for hire.

  • Thanks for posting these.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more