Added: 3 years ago
From: UKSecretCourts
Views: 2,139
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Happens here in the US too love, thats why we left the UK to begin with. I am sooo devastated for you.

  • What an evil man that Tony Bliar is!

  • but is doing their best enough to stop them from messing up their kids lives!?!

  • @BrutallyHonest3 how do you know that,you could of ended up in a care home with a load of peadophiles as carers,or bullied by a gang of physcho drug addicts forcing u into prostitution,im sorry for your upbringing,but that does not excuse these criminals bastards stealing babies from innocent parents doing there best to give them a loving decent upbringing.

  • This makes me sick! they talk about protecting the child.What about the damage they do to the child and family after the remove a child that is not abused or going to be abused.They are not here to help,but to steal infants and sell them to rich adopters to make a profit.I say shut these industries down or at least reform them.

  • If this Wanker told you what time it was, you would just HAVE to look at your watch!! Wouldn't you??....The lying TWAT!!!!......Google "Hollie Greig"!!

  • the blairs had there kids brought up by nannys

  • CLASS ACTION

    Your Name;

    Your full postal address;

    The case Number (will be on all court orders; if there is more than one case number, please supply all of them);

    A brief (2-3 line) description of the reasons given for the Orders.

    Class Period: 14 October 1991-Present

    Class Qualification: Care Orders issued pursuant to the Children Act 1989 (c. 41), subsequent adoption or other such orders (if any)

    Who can file as Class Litigants: Anybody who's Name appears on CA1989 applications

  • CLASS ACTION

    Your Name;

    Your full postal address;

    The case Number (will be on all court orders; if there is more than one case number, please supply all of them);

    A brief (2-3 line) description of the reasons given for the Orders.

    Class Period: 14 October 1991-Present

    Class Qualification: Care Orders issued pursuant to the Children Act 1989 (c. 41), subsequent adoption or other such orders (if any)

    Who can file as Class Litigants: Anybody who's Name appears on CA1989 applications

  • Blair and his type are merely 'delinquents in suits'. Identifying him and others pre-birth would save the nation far more than a few thousand squids. It would save us billions and the world millions of lost lives and unimaginable, untold horror and misery. I say yes to screening as long as it's compulsory for all those wishing to enter politics.

  • The menace is the state, watch

    'child stealing by the state' Brian Gerrish

    FOR THE TRUTH

  • Government SS are completely nuts. Blair is a war pig. Why doesn't Britain confiscate all the poor babies in Africa and China. Sick idiots.

  • Too stupid to marry

    watch?v=-5TMVlkFPgc

    Scotlands social workers declare mother too stupid to marry and halt the wedding 2 days before she's due to walk up the aisle.

  • how can it be in a child best interest to remove a baby from his \ her parents,for a likelihood of emotional abuse,a crime that has no defenition in uk law,if youve got nothing to hide open up the family courts to the press,and allow jurys to decide,but u wont will you,if your so intrested in protecting a childs anonimity,why advertise for adoption in main stream news with d o b pictures the works your so full of shit,you steal from the tax payer to justify destroying innocent families,

  • Mum wins in IRELAND!!

    Stop the deportation and adoption of her children

    watch?v=jZE-qPQgTFs

  • i dident like him before i hate him now

  • And why Tony are there so many 'dysfunctional' families? Could a lot of it be to do with govt policies concerned with keeping people poor, unemployed and destitute? Hark at Tony condoning taking babies before birth,omg I hate TB.

  • @smmeegal

    Spot on. Common Purpose strategy.Google Brian Gerrish and Common Purpose.

  • Brainwashed Puppet Blaire

  • watch?v=1-tbUsdrBlk

    Interested in how to raise a Freedom of Information Request?.

    **make them Squirm**

    Use the law against CAFCASS

  • Tony Blair was mad look at his eyes ; he actually believes what he is saying is right.

  • yeah, he even believed in WMD.

    He's a War criminal basically...

  • i disagreed with him on WMD, that was crap. This is an entirely different issue, however, and his link to it is furthermore so distant that it is hardly worth considering.

  • Tony Blair is right. Where you have evidence of meth addiction, for instance, or extremely violent behavior, the state is justified in taking the child and giving it a real life. And it doesnt just protect the child, it protects society too, from dysfunctional criminal children.

  • You need factual evidence.

    The social workers are taking children without evidence.

    No society accepts taking children on the "may harm" basis, as then social workers are Crystal Ball gazing...

    Getting situations like this wrong, is not acceptable. As adoption is a double life sentence for the child.

    FACTUAL OPEN COURTS!! Real evidence, not make believe, "big brother" tactics of child snatching.

  • you miss the point,,"may harm" is not just pulled out of their ass...it is put together with evidence of past behavior. you also miss the fact that the government incurs costs for this, and would like to avoid taking children, but they cannot responsibly look the other way when there is evidence of abuse.

  • PLEASE DO NOT ADOPT MY GRANDDAUGHTERS Face Book

    DOT Com SLASH Group DOT php QUESTION MARK gid EQUALS 52713890037

  • The Secret Family Courts are corrupt and most of the so-called Judges

    want sacking or better still put in prison, for what they have inflicted on many thousands of families.

    Children are being ripped apart from loving families that want them, it is EVIL & WICKED all of those involved from the social workers/cafcass.coram/LA legal team /foster care/secret courts/judges are only in it for the money !

    google ; please dont adopt my granddaughters

    see what is happening to families

  • yes you can really get rich taking care of babies...that seems like a silly argument, these are government workers. there salaries are fixed already

  • they are secret to protect the privacy of those involved. Otherwise there could be no real evidence as all of it would be private. Furthermore, as a parent you would have all your bad acts out in public. The secrecy is not unusual in these circumstances.

  • Google for Camilla Cavendish and The Times.

    Privacy can be achieved by OPEN court and removing the name of victims, as in juvenile courts and rape cases.

    Secrecy is when privacy is used to hide malpractice.

    Foster carers who are paedophiles... and the children being abused are gagged from speaking out.

    That is NOT in the child's interest. The public must be made aware when foster carers and social workers have previous convictions.

  • You need to have more faith in the system. Most of the people who involve themselves in family law care about children and dont want to see them harmed.

  • @tallcoolone1

    Oh! Fuck off! they have to met Stalinist Common Purpose targets. Death to them.

  • 'Freemason' run councils are powerful and dangerous like vampires they dont like the light - and I have a touch so BRIGHT it will blind them!

  • NO they steal children from the poor to give to the rich - no support needed!!!

  • Notice how Tony is cognitively projecting his own unresolved inner issues.

    Total giveaway, and he doess not see himself in the mirror of Truth.

  • MATRI- GENOCIDE.

    Eugenics.

    You son is a menace to society, but he was not legally trafficed.

  • Corporate Parenting is so good, that children are knowingly being raped, drugged, prostituted out and the girl of 17 servicing 5 men a day.

    Now Tony, that is what I call good parenting and child protection.

  • The SS are targeting special gifted children of celtic origin.

    It is eugenics which came from USA to Germany and UK.

    The SS said the same of my children being at risk years ago, and they are both professionals now, independent and secure.

    SO YOU GOT US WRONG.

    HOW MANY OTHERS.???

  • The key to survival = abolish CPS, as they are the greatest threat to children and families everywhere.

  • you are the mebace to society and the biggest threat ever to us loving mothers and innocent loved children

  • Tony Blair thinks now he has a child that he god where parenting is concerned. I hope he has a split up and has cafcass snooping in.. because he'll only be in the cryteria he has described. Big eared, no brained prat thats ruined the foundations of family morals

  • Tony Blair you TWAT!!!

  • lol. Nicely said.

    Eugenics in practice is horrific.

    I doubt any of us alive in the UK, is the perfect "eugenics specimen". So none of us have the right to have children on this criteria.

    And if the get the worlds population with IQ of over 120, what is the next criteria, height or looks??

    Unsafe, totally unsafe to be going down this path.

  • actually i fundamentally disagree. IQ's of over 120 would be great,,and who is say we don't need that as a species in order to survive? Don't forget I live in a country where retard Bush has been president for 8 years. I REALLY believe its time to stop underestimating intelligence. BTW...good nutrition and nurture also increases IQ, should we discontinue those practices too?

  • But who amongst us is perfect?

    There are many of us with a MENSA level IQ, that disagree with high IQ giving a right to survive.

    Artists and musicians may not have A level maths, but they are Mozarts in their field.

    Cybernetics teachs us that the most flexible organism survives.

    Therefore I would follow the first rule of Cybernetics. IQ isn't even half the story of the evolution of man.

  • Epilepsy, diabetes, ADHD, OCD are often "genetic". So what does that mean?

    Doctors are taking children - in Fran's case with out even meeting her.

    In English law there is no legal definition to "emotional harm", let alone may cause emotional harm.

    Therefore without Parliament defining these, the SS can apply the rules according to personal beliefs.

    Using state power.

    Off Tangent - but interesting.

    Fran has a very high IQ. She was studying Neuroscience in University.

  • But I do agree with part of your point, if it's true Using a Low IQ of one parent, an eating disorder, dyslexia, is completely absurd Many mental illnesses are also not genetic, and some like ADHD or OCD may actually be natural and a misunderstood or contributing part to society So how they chose these people for culling is certainly of concern And although the truth remains that this is a issue that has to be solved, how we will know where it is at fault may also be problem. still need solution

  • Eugenics selects on several criteria. Namely:

    - IQ

    - Disabilities

    - Good looks

    - Height

    Often its applied to those who believe in Civil Rights. Whatever policy the state doesn't support - get's labelled mentally ill.

    It's unsafe in operation.

  • Eugenics does not have a definate way of being done, Eugenics is a word that means that we should increase the birth rate of the good genes, and decrease that of the bad genes. That is all it means. How it is done has nothing to do with the word, it is very scalable, and could be done in countless ways, good or bad. The methods used in the past is completely irrelevant. the Old methods should never be used, I will agree, things should be done as scientifically accurate as possible and morally.

  • should be based more on income and some other completely objective and unbiased method, people should be able to have the chance to naturally prove themselves. above that other methods of selection should also help. Obeying the laws of nature means not caring for the poor and ugly or disabled, that would be even worse as respect to human integrity than Nazism. I say work with nature, but without trusting nature, do nature in a moral way.

  • rblwoaclu, totally agree

    Mothers are devastated by this.

    They might have dyslexia, or a slimming disease, so the state takes their children.

    Are you saying that only a high IQ can love a child?

    A low IQ can't have children?

    We do not need a Eugenics system.

    If you have a brilliant father, the son is often a dunce. Nature returns to equilibrium

  • Yes, certainly, Low-IQ mothers or parents should never be allowed to have children, and if they did have the right, it should be limited to one only, with tones of governmental help and assistance for those children. so long as at least one parent has an IQ above 120, or one has a high paying job, or the mother has a PhD or something, it should never be allowed.

    No both High IQ and Low IQ can love a child, but that does not mean that a low IQ can take care of the child. Evident that they can't

  • It's clear, that especially recently with all the state funds for the poor and charities, and latest improvement and availability of medical health. That human beings are not evolving, the healthy, attractive and smart have the least children, while the ones who aren't even able have the most. If we are to live in a integrated society we must also include Eugenics to continue and mimic nature, but in a moral way WHO: IQ's of 80 or less have more than 5 children, while under 120 have fewer than 1

  • excuse me that was ' over 120 have fewer than 1 '.

    other stats also state tha despite the modernification of society, which really does improve IQ, the world IQ for the last 100 years has decreased steadily by a full 7 point, if it continues, the average person will be a retard in just two generations from now. This is due to the improvement of technology and charities, good things, but they can't be without eugenics.

  • what about the disabled?

    What about the ugly?

    What about the short?

  • I imagine that I understand how you see it , thus your concern. I think that you see eugenics as how it used to be practiced, in Nazism, Japan, and socialist countries, but in essence, the true meaning of eugenics has absolutely nothing to do with what happened there. Be it Plato or Galton, the founders did never either proposed bloodshed, it was hijacked, misused and based on pseudoscience, not used for its truth

    I beg you, for all, the future of your life and humanity too, to rethink Eugenics

  • No, I've had a good look at Galton and Darwin.

    My understanding of Eugenics is from them.

    You are being selective - assuming that you have a Higher IQ than me, not doubt. lol. You may, but you may not.

    Is it difficult to believe many with a High IQ can stand against Eugenics.

    The first rule of Cybernetics - the most flexible survives.

    Obey the rules of nature - it's key to survival.

    Eugenics are not the key.

  • Viva Tony Blair!

  • They're putting foetus on the child protection register.

    This is the "may harm" principle. No actual harm has occurred. It may not.

    Zealots in the SS are taking unborn children.

    The Council of Europe - they've just started an Inquiry into our dear "dysfunctional" child protection/public law.

    Miscarriages of Justice are happening, in secret courts.

    Lets hope Europe stops the UK.

  • CAFCASS - Don't get mad - get even

    watch?v=ckkho1lccj8

  • what a piece of shite he is what gives him the moral authority to choose families for people your not god tony your a bloody war mongering muther ******* and I cant wait till The Most High smotes your ass.

  • Parents don't have the right either. Having children is a freedom that extends their own. GET REAL PEOPLE WE NEED A MORAL EUGENICS SYSTEM!

  • humans have souls.

  • Regardless if that is true or not, fetuses don't.

    An unborn fetus has about the same brain activity as a fish, and absolutely no sign of ever having consciousness.

    stem-cells and embryos or sperm don't either.

  • my fish play games with me.sperm knows where to go. is this an abortion issue or a culling issue,do you know the difference? Do you know the mysteries of life? if so you should do a video,

  • yes, but you eat fish, you eat chicken you eat beef. and those things are far worse in morality than abortion is

    Do I know the mysteries of life? Do you live in total ignorance to reality? Not to sound angry, but this is important. I question life, and when I think that I have the answer that has stood up without me seeing anything that was disproved about it then I will spread the word so that it reach many and could also be put to more tests

    It's far more reliable than the blindness of faith

  • It's more one-child abortion, pre-birth. I didn't do research about culling and what the alternative place would bring. Not so sure about culling, but remember that it is also true that some people have dysfunctional parents, which also would be unfair to the child. No real view yet on culling. But I am for a one-child policy which deals with pre-birth.

  • How horrible. The Government is operating a Baby racket.

  • Time to speak out, say your bit against Social Workers that have hidden behind secret courts.... until now! All comments are anonymous and untraceable.

    Copy this to your browser and replace DOT

    nameshamesocialworkersDOTblogs­potDOTcom

  • BBC are pure shit houses when it comes down to telling it how it IS .There is very little evidence how out of control ,this mad mans ideology is totally crazy .

    I would be embarrassed to be spawned by him as a child I would change my name and move country away from him what a horror of a human being.May god forgive you because I never will.

  • This is happening everyday to mothers in this country, taking babies into care means a vast wealth for the friends of the ss, adoption agencies, BAAF, Coram, psychologists and psychiatrist, even social workers get paid to take babies home from the care system for a year, all this sanctioned by the Labour party and their social engineering programme. Harman knows, Johnson knows, Straw knows, Balls knows, Brown knows, we've spoke to them all, and now you knows.

    Help the children, fight for them.

  • Excellent Editors Cut!!!! Did you notice the BBC news cut doesn't actually show tony's lips say the words "Pre Birth" whereas the full interview does.......compliant barstards at the BBC.......very subtle spin

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more