@BrutallyHonest3 how do you know that,you could of ended up in a care home with a load of peadophiles as carers,or bullied by a gang of physcho drug addicts forcing u into prostitution,im sorry for your upbringing,but that does not excuse these criminals bastards stealing babies from innocent parents doing there best to give them a loving decent upbringing.
This makes me sick! they talk about protecting the child.What about the damage they do to the child and family after the remove a child that is not abused or going to be abused.They are not here to help,but to steal infants and sell them to rich adopters to make a profit.I say shut these industries down or at least reform them.
If this Wanker told you what time it was, you would just HAVE to look at your watch!! Wouldn't you??....The lying TWAT!!!!......Google "Hollie Greig"!!
Blair and his type are merely 'delinquents in suits'. Identifying him and others pre-birth would save the nation far more than a few thousand squids. It would save us billions and the world millions of lost lives and unimaginable, untold horror and misery. I say yes to screening as long as it's compulsory for all those wishing to enter politics.
how can it be in a child best interest to remove a baby from his \ her parents,for a likelihood of emotional abuse,a crime that has no defenition in uk law,if youve got nothing to hide open up the family courts to the press,and allow jurys to decide,but u wont will you,if your so intrested in protecting a childs anonimity,why advertise for adoption in main stream news with d o b pictures the works your so full of shit,you steal from the tax payer to justify destroying innocent families,
And why Tony are there so many 'dysfunctional' families? Could a lot of it be to do with govt policies concerned with keeping people poor, unemployed and destitute? Hark at Tony condoning taking babies before birth,omg I hate TB.
Kent social workers and 'childrens trust boards' are spending thousands of taxpayers money on overnight stays in posh hotels out of their departments budgets ,which they control, at a mere £2000 a time - have they no shame? Kent Messenger 13/2/09
All paid for from the £millions profit made from 'Forced Adoptions' that all Parties condone by doing nothing to stop it .
i disagreed with him on WMD, that was crap. This is an entirely different issue, however, and his link to it is furthermore so distant that it is hardly worth considering.
Tony Blair is right. Where you have evidence of meth addiction, for instance, or extremely violent behavior, the state is justified in taking the child and giving it a real life. And it doesnt just protect the child, it protects society too, from dysfunctional criminal children.
you miss the point,,"may harm" is not just pulled out of their ass...it is put together with evidence of past behavior. you also miss the fact that the government incurs costs for this, and would like to avoid taking children, but they cannot responsibly look the other way when there is evidence of abuse.
The Secret Family Courts are corrupt and most of the so-called Judges
want sacking or better still put in prison, for what they have inflicted on many thousands of families.
Children are being ripped apart from loving families that want them, it is EVIL & WICKED all of those involved from the social workers/cafcass.coram/LA legal team /foster care/secret courts/judges are only in it for the money !
they are secret to protect the privacy of those involved. Otherwise there could be no real evidence as all of it would be private. Furthermore, as a parent you would have all your bad acts out in public. The secrecy is not unusual in these circumstances.
You need to have more faith in the system. Most of the people who involve themselves in family law care about children and dont want to see them harmed.
Tony Blair thinks now he has a child that he god where parenting is concerned. I hope he has a split up and has cafcass snooping in.. because he'll only be in the cryteria he has described. Big eared, no brained prat thats ruined the foundations of family morals
actually i fundamentally disagree. IQ's of over 120 would be great,,and who is say we don't need that as a species in order to survive? Don't forget I live in a country where retard Bush has been president for 8 years. I REALLY believe its time to stop underestimating intelligence. BTW...good nutrition and nurture also increases IQ, should we discontinue those practices too?
But I do agree with part of your point, if it's true Using a Low IQ of one parent, an eating disorder, dyslexia, is completely absurd Many mental illnesses are also not genetic, and some like ADHD or OCD may actually be natural and a misunderstood or contributing part to society So how they chose these people for culling is certainly of concern And although the truth remains that this is a issue that has to be solved, how we will know where it is at fault may also be problem. still need solution
Eugenics does not have a definate way of being done, Eugenics is a word that means that we should increase the birth rate of the good genes, and decrease that of the bad genes. That is all it means. How it is done has nothing to do with the word, it is very scalable, and could be done in countless ways, good or bad. The methods used in the past is completely irrelevant. the Old methods should never be used, I will agree, things should be done as scientifically accurate as possible and morally.
should be based more on income and some other completely objective and unbiased method, people should be able to have the chance to naturally prove themselves. above that other methods of selection should also help. Obeying the laws of nature means not caring for the poor and ugly or disabled, that would be even worse as respect to human integrity than Nazism. I say work with nature, but without trusting nature, do nature in a moral way.
Yes, certainly, Low-IQ mothers or parents should never be allowed to have children, and if they did have the right, it should be limited to one only, with tones of governmental help and assistance for those children. so long as at least one parent has an IQ above 120, or one has a high paying job, or the mother has a PhD or something, it should never be allowed.
No both High IQ and Low IQ can love a child, but that does not mean that a low IQ can take care of the child. Evident that they can't
It's clear, that especially recently with all the state funds for the poor and charities, and latest improvement and availability of medical health. That human beings are not evolving, the healthy, attractive and smart have the least children, while the ones who aren't even able have the most. If we are to live in a integrated society we must also include Eugenics to continue and mimic nature, but in a moral way WHO: IQ's of 80 or less have more than 5 children, while under 120 have fewer than 1
excuse me that was ' over 120 have fewer than 1 '.
other stats also state tha despite the modernification of society, which really does improve IQ, the world IQ for the last 100 years has decreased steadily by a full 7 point, if it continues, the average person will be a retard in just two generations from now. This is due to the improvement of technology and charities, good things, but they can't be without eugenics.
I imagine that I understand how you see it , thus your concern. I think that you see eugenics as how it used to be practiced, in Nazism, Japan, and socialist countries, but in essence, the true meaning of eugenics has absolutely nothing to do with what happened there. Be it Plato or Galton, the founders did never either proposed bloodshed, it was hijacked, misused and based on pseudoscience, not used for its truth
I beg you, for all, the future of your life and humanity too, to rethink Eugenics
what a piece of shite he is what gives him the moral authority to choose families for people your not god tony your a bloody war mongering muther ******* and I cant wait till The Most High smotes your ass.
my fish play games with me.sperm knows where to go. is this an abortion issue or a culling issue,do you know the difference? Do you know the mysteries of life? if so you should do a video,
yes, but you eat fish, you eat chicken you eat beef. and those things are far worse in morality than abortion is
Do I know the mysteries of life? Do you live in total ignorance to reality? Not to sound angry, but this is important. I question life, and when I think that I have the answer that has stood up without me seeing anything that was disproved about it then I will spread the word so that it reach many and could also be put to more tests
It's far more reliable than the blindness of faith
It's more one-child abortion, pre-birth. I didn't do research about culling and what the alternative place would bring. Not so sure about culling, but remember that it is also true that some people have dysfunctional parents, which also would be unfair to the child. No real view yet on culling. But I am for a one-child policy which deals with pre-birth.
Time to speak out, say your bit against Social Workers that have hidden behind secret courts.... until now! All comments are anonymous and untraceable.
BBC are pure shit houses when it comes down to telling it how it IS .There is very little evidence how out of control ,this mad mans ideology is totally crazy .
I would be embarrassed to be spawned by him as a child I would change my name and move country away from him what a horror of a human being.May god forgive you because I never will.
This is happening everyday to mothers in this country, taking babies into care means a vast wealth for the friends of the ss, adoption agencies, BAAF, Coram, psychologists and psychiatrist, even social workers get paid to take babies home from the care system for a year, all this sanctioned by the Labour party and their social engineering programme. Harman knows, Johnson knows, Straw knows, Balls knows, Brown knows, we've spoke to them all, and now you knows.
Excellent Editors Cut!!!! Did you notice the BBC news cut doesn't actually show tony's lips say the words "Pre Birth" whereas the full interview does.......compliant barstards at the BBC.......very subtle spin
Happens here in the US too love, thats why we left the UK to begin with. I am sooo devastated for you.
talithakoumi 1 month ago
What an evil man that Tony Bliar is!
PeterMWeller 9 months ago
but is doing their best enough to stop them from messing up their kids lives!?!
LegoSwordViedos 1 year ago
@BrutallyHonest3 how do you know that,you could of ended up in a care home with a load of peadophiles as carers,or bullied by a gang of physcho drug addicts forcing u into prostitution,im sorry for your upbringing,but that does not excuse these criminals bastards stealing babies from innocent parents doing there best to give them a loving decent upbringing.
3rk4u 1 year ago
This makes me sick! they talk about protecting the child.What about the damage they do to the child and family after the remove a child that is not abused or going to be abused.They are not here to help,but to steal infants and sell them to rich adopters to make a profit.I say shut these industries down or at least reform them.
ashatbulaparanormal 1 year ago 2
If this Wanker told you what time it was, you would just HAVE to look at your watch!! Wouldn't you??....The lying TWAT!!!!......Google "Hollie Greig"!!
planetyouranus22 1 year ago
the blairs had there kids brought up by nannys
bootlehistory 1 year ago
CLASS ACTION
Your Name;
Your full postal address;
The case Number (will be on all court orders; if there is more than one case number, please supply all of them);
A brief (2-3 line) description of the reasons given for the Orders.
Class Period: 14 October 1991-Present
Class Qualification: Care Orders issued pursuant to the Children Act 1989 (c. 41), subsequent adoption or other such orders (if any)
Who can file as Class Litigants: Anybody who's Name appears on CA1989 applications
UKSecretCourts 1 year ago
CLASS ACTION
Your Name;
Your full postal address;
The case Number (will be on all court orders; if there is more than one case number, please supply all of them);
A brief (2-3 line) description of the reasons given for the Orders.
Class Period: 14 October 1991-Present
Class Qualification: Care Orders issued pursuant to the Children Act 1989 (c. 41), subsequent adoption or other such orders (if any)
Who can file as Class Litigants: Anybody who's Name appears on CA1989 applications
UKSecretCourts 1 year ago
Blair and his type are merely 'delinquents in suits'. Identifying him and others pre-birth would save the nation far more than a few thousand squids. It would save us billions and the world millions of lost lives and unimaginable, untold horror and misery. I say yes to screening as long as it's compulsory for all those wishing to enter politics.
dharmashooter 1 year ago
The menace is the state, watch
'child stealing by the state' Brian Gerrish
FOR THE TRUTH
UKDirtySecret 2 years ago
Government SS are completely nuts. Blair is a war pig. Why doesn't Britain confiscate all the poor babies in Africa and China. Sick idiots.
karuspery 2 years ago
Too stupid to marry
watch?v=-5TMVlkFPgc
Scotlands social workers declare mother too stupid to marry and halt the wedding 2 days before she's due to walk up the aisle.
UKSecretCourts 2 years ago
how can it be in a child best interest to remove a baby from his \ her parents,for a likelihood of emotional abuse,a crime that has no defenition in uk law,if youve got nothing to hide open up the family courts to the press,and allow jurys to decide,but u wont will you,if your so intrested in protecting a childs anonimity,why advertise for adoption in main stream news with d o b pictures the works your so full of shit,you steal from the tax payer to justify destroying innocent families,
3rk4u 2 years ago 4
Mum wins in IRELAND!!
Stop the deportation and adoption of her children
watch?v=jZE-qPQgTFs
UKSecretCourts 2 years ago
i dident like him before i hate him now
worldchaos79 2 years ago 3
And why Tony are there so many 'dysfunctional' families? Could a lot of it be to do with govt policies concerned with keeping people poor, unemployed and destitute? Hark at Tony condoning taking babies before birth,omg I hate TB.
smmeegal 2 years ago 6
@smmeegal
Spot on. Common Purpose strategy.Google Brian Gerrish and Common Purpose.
karuspery 2 years ago
Brainwashed Puppet Blaire
truexposure 2 years ago 5
watch?v=1-tbUsdrBlk
Interested in how to raise a Freedom of Information Request?.
**make them Squirm**
Use the law against CAFCASS
UKSecretCourts 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jack Straw's brother has just been convicted....
as a sex offender.
Does it all make sense suddenly.
Isolate the children and gag them.
The Ministry of Injustice is a sham, a scam to hide mass crimes of torture against British citizens.
mshope4us 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
name shame social workers(all one word)
DOT blog spot (all one word) Dot com
mshope4us 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kent social workers and 'childrens trust boards' are spending thousands of taxpayers money on overnight stays in posh hotels out of their departments budgets ,which they control, at a mere £2000 a time - have they no shame? Kent Messenger 13/2/09
All paid for from the £millions profit made from 'Forced Adoptions' that all Parties condone by doing nothing to stop it .
mshope4us 3 years ago
Tony Blair was mad look at his eyes ; he actually believes what he is saying is right.
liverpoollou6 3 years ago 2
yeah, he even believed in WMD.
He's a War criminal basically...
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
i disagreed with him on WMD, that was crap. This is an entirely different issue, however, and his link to it is furthermore so distant that it is hardly worth considering.
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
Tony Blair is right. Where you have evidence of meth addiction, for instance, or extremely violent behavior, the state is justified in taking the child and giving it a real life. And it doesnt just protect the child, it protects society too, from dysfunctional criminal children.
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
You need factual evidence.
The social workers are taking children without evidence.
No society accepts taking children on the "may harm" basis, as then social workers are Crystal Ball gazing...
Getting situations like this wrong, is not acceptable. As adoption is a double life sentence for the child.
FACTUAL OPEN COURTS!! Real evidence, not make believe, "big brother" tactics of child snatching.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
you miss the point,,"may harm" is not just pulled out of their ass...it is put together with evidence of past behavior. you also miss the fact that the government incurs costs for this, and would like to avoid taking children, but they cannot responsibly look the other way when there is evidence of abuse.
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
PLEASE DO NOT ADOPT MY GRANDDAUGHTERS Face Book
DOT Com SLASH Group DOT php QUESTION MARK gid EQUALS 52713890037
mshope4us 3 years ago 2
The Secret Family Courts are corrupt and most of the so-called Judges
want sacking or better still put in prison, for what they have inflicted on many thousands of families.
Children are being ripped apart from loving families that want them, it is EVIL & WICKED all of those involved from the social workers/cafcass.coram/LA legal team /foster care/secret courts/judges are only in it for the money !
google ; please dont adopt my granddaughters
see what is happening to families
mshope4us 3 years ago
yes you can really get rich taking care of babies...that seems like a silly argument, these are government workers. there salaries are fixed already
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
they are secret to protect the privacy of those involved. Otherwise there could be no real evidence as all of it would be private. Furthermore, as a parent you would have all your bad acts out in public. The secrecy is not unusual in these circumstances.
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
Google for Camilla Cavendish and The Times.
Privacy can be achieved by OPEN court and removing the name of victims, as in juvenile courts and rape cases.
Secrecy is when privacy is used to hide malpractice.
Foster carers who are paedophiles... and the children being abused are gagged from speaking out.
That is NOT in the child's interest. The public must be made aware when foster carers and social workers have previous convictions.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
You need to have more faith in the system. Most of the people who involve themselves in family law care about children and dont want to see them harmed.
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
@tallcoolone1
Oh! Fuck off! they have to met Stalinist Common Purpose targets. Death to them.
karuspery 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why are children being stolen for 'FORCED ADOPTION' in CORRUPT TORY /LAB/LIB run councils all over the UK
This EVIL ,VILE ,WICKNESS ,is also what the Nazi's carried out
So why are we allowing our MP's who ALL know how CORRUPT the social services/cafcass/secret family courts are
to turn a 'blind eye' for profit !
We Will Fight To Show You For What You Are PURE EVIL And Will Reclaim Our Stolen Children
mshope4us 3 years ago
'Freemason' run councils are powerful and dangerous like vampires they dont like the light - and I have a touch so BRIGHT it will blind them!
mshope4us 3 years ago
NO they steal children from the poor to give to the rich - no support needed!!!
mshope4us 3 years ago
Notice how Tony is cognitively projecting his own unresolved inner issues.
Total giveaway, and he doess not see himself in the mirror of Truth.
LadyJustice666 3 years ago 2
MATRI- GENOCIDE.
Eugenics.
You son is a menace to society, but he was not legally trafficed.
LadyJustice666 3 years ago 2
Corporate Parenting is so good, that children are knowingly being raped, drugged, prostituted out and the girl of 17 servicing 5 men a day.
Now Tony, that is what I call good parenting and child protection.
LadyJustice666 3 years ago 2
The SS are targeting special gifted children of celtic origin.
It is eugenics which came from USA to Germany and UK.
The SS said the same of my children being at risk years ago, and they are both professionals now, independent and secure.
SO YOU GOT US WRONG.
HOW MANY OTHERS.???
LadyJustice666 3 years ago 2
The key to survival = abolish CPS, as they are the greatest threat to children and families everywhere.
CPSSucks 3 years ago 2
you are the mebace to society and the biggest threat ever to us loving mothers and innocent loved children
evette77uk 3 years ago
Tony Blair thinks now he has a child that he god where parenting is concerned. I hope he has a split up and has cafcass snooping in.. because he'll only be in the cryteria he has described. Big eared, no brained prat thats ruined the foundations of family morals
vix26uk2006 3 years ago
Tony Blair you TWAT!!!
clarabella32 3 years ago 2
lol. Nicely said.
Eugenics in practice is horrific.
I doubt any of us alive in the UK, is the perfect "eugenics specimen". So none of us have the right to have children on this criteria.
And if the get the worlds population with IQ of over 120, what is the next criteria, height or looks??
Unsafe, totally unsafe to be going down this path.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
actually i fundamentally disagree. IQ's of over 120 would be great,,and who is say we don't need that as a species in order to survive? Don't forget I live in a country where retard Bush has been president for 8 years. I REALLY believe its time to stop underestimating intelligence. BTW...good nutrition and nurture also increases IQ, should we discontinue those practices too?
tallcoolone1 3 years ago
But who amongst us is perfect?
There are many of us with a MENSA level IQ, that disagree with high IQ giving a right to survive.
Artists and musicians may not have A level maths, but they are Mozarts in their field.
Cybernetics teachs us that the most flexible organism survives.
Therefore I would follow the first rule of Cybernetics. IQ isn't even half the story of the evolution of man.
UKSecretCourts 2 years ago
Epilepsy, diabetes, ADHD, OCD are often "genetic". So what does that mean?
Doctors are taking children - in Fran's case with out even meeting her.
In English law there is no legal definition to "emotional harm", let alone may cause emotional harm.
Therefore without Parliament defining these, the SS can apply the rules according to personal beliefs.
Using state power.
Off Tangent - but interesting.
Fran has a very high IQ. She was studying Neuroscience in University.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
But I do agree with part of your point, if it's true Using a Low IQ of one parent, an eating disorder, dyslexia, is completely absurd Many mental illnesses are also not genetic, and some like ADHD or OCD may actually be natural and a misunderstood or contributing part to society So how they chose these people for culling is certainly of concern And although the truth remains that this is a issue that has to be solved, how we will know where it is at fault may also be problem. still need solution
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
Eugenics selects on several criteria. Namely:
- IQ
- Disabilities
- Good looks
- Height
Often its applied to those who believe in Civil Rights. Whatever policy the state doesn't support - get's labelled mentally ill.
It's unsafe in operation.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
Eugenics does not have a definate way of being done, Eugenics is a word that means that we should increase the birth rate of the good genes, and decrease that of the bad genes. That is all it means. How it is done has nothing to do with the word, it is very scalable, and could be done in countless ways, good or bad. The methods used in the past is completely irrelevant. the Old methods should never be used, I will agree, things should be done as scientifically accurate as possible and morally.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
should be based more on income and some other completely objective and unbiased method, people should be able to have the chance to naturally prove themselves. above that other methods of selection should also help. Obeying the laws of nature means not caring for the poor and ugly or disabled, that would be even worse as respect to human integrity than Nazism. I say work with nature, but without trusting nature, do nature in a moral way.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
rblwoaclu, totally agree
Mothers are devastated by this.
They might have dyslexia, or a slimming disease, so the state takes their children.
Are you saying that only a high IQ can love a child?
A low IQ can't have children?
We do not need a Eugenics system.
If you have a brilliant father, the son is often a dunce. Nature returns to equilibrium
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
Yes, certainly, Low-IQ mothers or parents should never be allowed to have children, and if they did have the right, it should be limited to one only, with tones of governmental help and assistance for those children. so long as at least one parent has an IQ above 120, or one has a high paying job, or the mother has a PhD or something, it should never be allowed.
No both High IQ and Low IQ can love a child, but that does not mean that a low IQ can take care of the child. Evident that they can't
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
It's clear, that especially recently with all the state funds for the poor and charities, and latest improvement and availability of medical health. That human beings are not evolving, the healthy, attractive and smart have the least children, while the ones who aren't even able have the most. If we are to live in a integrated society we must also include Eugenics to continue and mimic nature, but in a moral way WHO: IQ's of 80 or less have more than 5 children, while under 120 have fewer than 1
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
excuse me that was ' over 120 have fewer than 1 '.
other stats also state tha despite the modernification of society, which really does improve IQ, the world IQ for the last 100 years has decreased steadily by a full 7 point, if it continues, the average person will be a retard in just two generations from now. This is due to the improvement of technology and charities, good things, but they can't be without eugenics.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
what about the disabled?
What about the ugly?
What about the short?
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
I imagine that I understand how you see it , thus your concern. I think that you see eugenics as how it used to be practiced, in Nazism, Japan, and socialist countries, but in essence, the true meaning of eugenics has absolutely nothing to do with what happened there. Be it Plato or Galton, the founders did never either proposed bloodshed, it was hijacked, misused and based on pseudoscience, not used for its truth
I beg you, for all, the future of your life and humanity too, to rethink Eugenics
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
No, I've had a good look at Galton and Darwin.
My understanding of Eugenics is from them.
You are being selective - assuming that you have a Higher IQ than me, not doubt. lol. You may, but you may not.
Is it difficult to believe many with a High IQ can stand against Eugenics.
The first rule of Cybernetics - the most flexible survives.
Obey the rules of nature - it's key to survival.
Eugenics are not the key.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
Viva Tony Blair!
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
They're putting foetus on the child protection register.
This is the "may harm" principle. No actual harm has occurred. It may not.
Zealots in the SS are taking unborn children.
The Council of Europe - they've just started an Inquiry into our dear "dysfunctional" child protection/public law.
Miscarriages of Justice are happening, in secret courts.
Lets hope Europe stops the UK.
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
CAFCASS - Don't get mad - get even
watch?v=ckkho1lccj8
UKSecretCourts 3 years ago
what a piece of shite he is what gives him the moral authority to choose families for people your not god tony your a bloody war mongering muther ******* and I cant wait till The Most High smotes your ass.
rblwoaclu 3 years ago
Parents don't have the right either. Having children is a freedom that extends their own. GET REAL PEOPLE WE NEED A MORAL EUGENICS SYSTEM!
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
humans have souls.
rblwoaclu 3 years ago
Regardless if that is true or not, fetuses don't.
An unborn fetus has about the same brain activity as a fish, and absolutely no sign of ever having consciousness.
stem-cells and embryos or sperm don't either.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
my fish play games with me.sperm knows where to go. is this an abortion issue or a culling issue,do you know the difference? Do you know the mysteries of life? if so you should do a video,
rblwoaclu 3 years ago
yes, but you eat fish, you eat chicken you eat beef. and those things are far worse in morality than abortion is
Do I know the mysteries of life? Do you live in total ignorance to reality? Not to sound angry, but this is important. I question life, and when I think that I have the answer that has stood up without me seeing anything that was disproved about it then I will spread the word so that it reach many and could also be put to more tests
It's far more reliable than the blindness of faith
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
It's more one-child abortion, pre-birth. I didn't do research about culling and what the alternative place would bring. Not so sure about culling, but remember that it is also true that some people have dysfunctional parents, which also would be unfair to the child. No real view yet on culling. But I am for a one-child policy which deals with pre-birth.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
How horrible. The Government is operating a Baby racket.
osoluckyme 3 years ago 2
Time to speak out, say your bit against Social Workers that have hidden behind secret courts.... until now! All comments are anonymous and untraceable.
Copy this to your browser and replace DOT
nameshamesocialworkersDOTblogspotDOTcom
WeAreGrowingBigger 3 years ago 4
BBC are pure shit houses when it comes down to telling it how it IS .There is very little evidence how out of control ,this mad mans ideology is totally crazy .
I would be embarrassed to be spawned by him as a child I would change my name and move country away from him what a horror of a human being.May god forgive you because I never will.
lindamac 3 years ago 5
This is happening everyday to mothers in this country, taking babies into care means a vast wealth for the friends of the ss, adoption agencies, BAAF, Coram, psychologists and psychiatrist, even social workers get paid to take babies home from the care system for a year, all this sanctioned by the Labour party and their social engineering programme. Harman knows, Johnson knows, Straw knows, Balls knows, Brown knows, we've spoke to them all, and now you knows.
Help the children, fight for them.
SSkissmyarse 3 years ago 4
Excellent Editors Cut!!!! Did you notice the BBC news cut doesn't actually show tony's lips say the words "Pre Birth" whereas the full interview does.......compliant barstards at the BBC.......very subtle spin
Odysseylive 3 years ago 4