Added: 4 years ago
From: LaSaro888
Views: 9,875
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • thank you someone who has a brain. the liars out there should be banned from youtube

  • It looks like the only myth that is busted: Engineers as techs. The experiment failed becuase of your magnet alignment is not perpendicular to the field; the magnetic filed is disturbed by the steel ball; and you have a flawed design since you would want the exterior ring to move not the small ring. try another test.

  • The appearance of the Moon orbiting slowly to the West is an illusion, it is in fact moving very quickly towards the East. At almost the same speed as the rotation of the Earth, distance creates the illusion of slow movement in the opposite direction.

  • I find it to be of extreme importance to reduce pollution, and conserve our fuels for heavy machinery, flight and the like. Any way of producing energy without excess air pollution is important to our future. Keep it up!

  • Also, relative magnets. It seems the Moon, at one time has rolled across the surface of our planet, Earth. This event could be caused by a solar flare of our Sun. It would have to be a flare of considerable strength, caused only by an extremely rare magnetic or gravitational anomoly. The Moon would maintain it's orbital movement and roll only across one side of the planet, or make a close pass. Diamagnetism and the effects of superheating and supercooling can demonstrate this phenomenon...

  • If the ratio and strength of the magnets were unbalanced properly, the center piece should continue to spin, as opposed to stopping or being drawn to the other magnets. A bit more accuracy should result in the effect you are looking for, nice try though!

  • Your scientific methods are Excellent! The true scientist only believes what he can demonstrate. My hats off to you for not trying to pass this off as something that it is not, unlike so many. I too have tried similar experiments but unfortunately i only came to a greater understanding of why it wont work

  • those two need smoke grass less.

  • I found about the same studying my Hamel GMD replication. see ?v=MP4Y6nzaPRg

  • i think u got it a bit wrong.the ball must move on its axis also.thats why u re using a ball and not a shaft.see how the hamel engine moves (the cones).its the same principle.Watch "Clanzers hamel spinner re-post of part 4" video on utube, its a great start.

  • yes, but hwy revolutions fading in the end of this "Clanzers hamel spiner`s" video?

  • well i don't know.Maybe he spin's it at the start by hand cos he doesn't show us how it's starting, right? I really don't understand why he's not posting his conclusions.

  • This is the first video pertaining to this subject (magnetic propulsion) that makes any sense to me. The intelligence and integrity displayed here is very much appreciated!

  • Thanks LaSaro888 and both of those who explain it clearly in this video clip.

    Most people think they can get an energy from nothing and this is not true!

  • yes, it`s wrong way to get something out of it. but we only were trying this composition, becose, we saw it on internet, where som one was presenting it like a real thing.

  • your doing it very wrong, the same outter circle should be taken place in the center, just in a smaller version...the cirlce once again with negative faceing positive but u can never do it with 1 solid magnet in the middle, u also dont have the angle formula in any of ur magnets, neg,pos,neg,pos,neg,pos

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more