Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
@myoldshorts God inspired the devil. Remember that one mans garbage is another mans treasure. STALIN AND HITLER were evil--because they were influenced (loosely) by blavatsky does not mean she would have agreed with their mass murdering. And ALL of americas founding fathers (whom apparently held an oppositional view from the nazi's and soviets) were all masons (except Washington--whom became one during his precidency) so....w'sup?
@TheGreatDeciever55 I still haven't seen prove that the founding fathers were freemasons besides some paintings that were done long after they had all died. Besides if they were then who is to say they didn't set this all up for a One World Government like Blavatsky wished upon? Also it was Washington that defeated the British before he was President and no one else. Not to mention that the Illuminati did not set up shop here until 1776 and they changed the Freemasons.
@myoldshorts And it is documented within the freemasons society that almost all "founding fathers" were masons--take the time to look it up. But the point i was making is that evil is perception. You call hitler evil--meaning is opposition must be (loosely) rightious--when they have the same influences--percieved differently. Its also funny how you mention they didnt set up shop till 1776 (when they were newly formed) because your declaration of independence is written the same year......
@TheGreatDeciever55 But they had no political affiliation until Wilson became president. Also the only evidence give to show our founding fathers as freemasons are within paintings that were painted long after the facts.
@myoldshorts OFFICIALIZED political affiliation. How many things are still kept classified from us today? TOO MUCH!! Masons are widely documented!! not only were they non existent during times of Babylon (just to rebuddle that point--plus the illuminati were around long before Babylon in ancient sumeria anyway) But It is actually concensus between historians that the Masons were the main political and social backing of the American revolution--aswell as the french at around the same time.
@myoldshorts That is to say...The MAINSTREAM masons--whom most members actually didnt even know shit all about architecture. I cant say the illuminati was behind it...but my god That 1776 date is either extremely shifty--or extremely coincidental.---I dont know why you think that the only proof of their involvment was some paintings.....their is actually abundent eye witness accounts of George Washington being sworn in...EVERY SINGLE account says it was followed by a masonic ceromony.
@TheGreatDeciever55 A couple more things. See if you read up on some of these people like Blavatsky and Albert Pike you will find that they have been planning a One World Government since at least the eighteen hundreds. I'm sure though that it's been put into process long before that. Let's say the days of Babylon where all this Freemason crap comes from anyway. King Nimrod or as some like to call him SATAN!
@myoldshorts The one World government is two pronged. It is not inheriantly evil. How could it be more evil then the seclusion and irrational hate that is bred when we live in a world that compartmentalizes everything? Americans are this--arabs are that--french are this. FUCK THAT. A one world government would erase such illogical illusions by incorporating the idea of brotherhood regardless of race or caste..or it could force a new culture upon us. the point is that blavasky was for the earlier
@TheGreatDeciever55 and just to clear up any misconception about anti semitism within Theosophic society (inwhich it is abundent) I have read quite alot on Blavasky and came to (my own) conclusion that it seems she insinuates that greedy arrogant slefish people are semites--not that traditional semites (arabs jews etc) are greedy arrogant and power hungry. its constantly defined differently
Why does the Theosophical Society constantly lie and use their lies to try and rewrite history? You people are all full of it and you should shut your mouths and look around you at the real world. You are an evil cult and nothing more.
for millenia... we have to find out... specially that now are so many dangers in the world.... fuk you snake eater....... gandhi look a like theosophyst mada faker... but not in a bad way... its with love.... not racist... the gods.... jajjajajaj ... god is not anything antrophomorphic..... shes fucking out of her mind.....
Completely incorrect. Hitler believed Guido von List who took Blavatsky's ideas, mixed them up with nationalistic and fascist ideas, and changed it into Ariosophy..
Instead of so much TALK-TALK-TALK why don't you people try to LISTEN-LISTEN-LISTEN? I'm referring to the endless, squabbling commentaries from people that think that they are so smart. Also, philosophy/theosophy/theology is not the property of the rich (or the poor, for that matter), rather, it belongs to anyone that seeks to KNOW; period.
training cant be done being slave of words created by untrained man!:)so the woman is just untrained person repeating nice words over and over leading nowere!
noone will be saved, accept the very rich & 'plenty of time ones'! Who is OUR saviour?? the christ of the common man??????! Because all the common man & woman does, is to feed the mouths of them rich! We are always struggling to make ends meet, who cares about religion, pilosophie, if we don't have time to think about it, & when our only worrie is to feed our mouths & our children!! where is the theosophical soc etc to save & help us with hope??? philosophie is a luxury problem.
this is the case when on talks constantly-be good, be very good and so on and enjoys this. but thing is simple talk without training is nice show and giving nothing to the listeners neither to her!
You don't have to follow the societies ways. The word itself has an impeccable etymology, and is suitable to mean what I talk about. I don't care about the squabble's of the corresponding governing body, so long as the basis of what they teach (or were supposed to) is proper.
Well that depends on who is defining 'proper'. Theosophy's teachings are primarily based upon authoritarian revelations, particularly HPB, and the word of the Masters whom only certain people (at the top) can hear. Typically, those who question the word of the Masters are accused of being under the influence of 'dark powers', welcome to the insane comedy that is theosophy, I suggest you do a little reading instead of ass kissing a useless word etymology.
Not once in my life have i found someone as ignorant as you since you dont know what the hell you are talking about and never did theosophy tech something you are trying to tell us here.
But it isn't. It's more of a thought of unity between all. Theosophy literally means Divine Knowledge. Divine knowledge entails all knowledge that has been gathered by humanity about its Godly origins. It represents a Unity of all, not a particular dogma which opposes any particular religion. We believe we can learn from eachother, which even Ghandi believed in.
How very idealistic, however Theosophy as a collective entity is a shambles home to ideas that could easily be construed as racist (see Leadbeater's Root Races). Simply, the language and teachings of theosophy are stuck in the Victorian age and having attended meetings myself this seems to be the way they want to keep it. Under all the empty rhetoric of universal brotherhood beats a religious heart, i.e. 'this way is the right way for all humanity'. They can keep it.
To me, there is a tendency in Theosophy to deny diversity of religious expression; religions do not all say the same thing, or say the same thing differently; there are differences, and a beautiful, rich tapestry of interpretation is also created, within each religion. We don't need religious Esperanto, but thanks for the offer!
This has been flagged as spam show
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
Blavatsky was a Luciferian and a member of a Freemason sect who's teachings inspired not only Hitler but also Joseph Stalin and people who are running the United Nations right now. They are also Eugenesis. They are Evil plain and simple.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
@myoldshorts God inspired the devil. Remember that one mans garbage is another mans treasure. STALIN AND HITLER were evil--because they were influenced (loosely) by blavatsky does not mean she would have agreed with their mass murdering. And ALL of americas founding fathers (whom apparently held an oppositional view from the nazi's and soviets) were all masons (except Washington--whom became one during his precidency) so....w'sup?
TheGreatDeciever55 1 year ago
@TheGreatDeciever55 I still haven't seen prove that the founding fathers were freemasons besides some paintings that were done long after they had all died. Besides if they were then who is to say they didn't set this all up for a One World Government like Blavatsky wished upon? Also it was Washington that defeated the British before he was President and no one else. Not to mention that the Illuminati did not set up shop here until 1776 and they changed the Freemasons.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
@myoldshorts And it is documented within the freemasons society that almost all "founding fathers" were masons--take the time to look it up. But the point i was making is that evil is perception. You call hitler evil--meaning is opposition must be (loosely) rightious--when they have the same influences--percieved differently. Its also funny how you mention they didnt set up shop till 1776 (when they were newly formed) because your declaration of independence is written the same year......
TheGreatDeciever55 1 year ago
@TheGreatDeciever55 But they had no political affiliation until Wilson became president. Also the only evidence give to show our founding fathers as freemasons are within paintings that were painted long after the facts.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
@myoldshorts OFFICIALIZED political affiliation. How many things are still kept classified from us today? TOO MUCH!! Masons are widely documented!! not only were they non existent during times of Babylon (just to rebuddle that point--plus the illuminati were around long before Babylon in ancient sumeria anyway) But It is actually concensus between historians that the Masons were the main political and social backing of the American revolution--aswell as the french at around the same time.
TheGreatDeciever55 1 year ago
@myoldshorts That is to say...The MAINSTREAM masons--whom most members actually didnt even know shit all about architecture. I cant say the illuminati was behind it...but my god That 1776 date is either extremely shifty--or extremely coincidental.---I dont know why you think that the only proof of their involvment was some paintings.....their is actually abundent eye witness accounts of George Washington being sworn in...EVERY SINGLE account says it was followed by a masonic ceromony.
TheGreatDeciever55 1 year ago
@TheGreatDeciever55 Maybe you could give me some actual historical accounts of Washington being a Freemason and I will look into it.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
@TheGreatDeciever55 A couple more things. See if you read up on some of these people like Blavatsky and Albert Pike you will find that they have been planning a One World Government since at least the eighteen hundreds. I'm sure though that it's been put into process long before that. Let's say the days of Babylon where all this Freemason crap comes from anyway. King Nimrod or as some like to call him SATAN!
myoldshorts 1 year ago
@myoldshorts The one World government is two pronged. It is not inheriantly evil. How could it be more evil then the seclusion and irrational hate that is bred when we live in a world that compartmentalizes everything? Americans are this--arabs are that--french are this. FUCK THAT. A one world government would erase such illogical illusions by incorporating the idea of brotherhood regardless of race or caste..or it could force a new culture upon us. the point is that blavasky was for the earlier
TheGreatDeciever55 1 year ago
@TheGreatDeciever55 and just to clear up any misconception about anti semitism within Theosophic society (inwhich it is abundent) I have read quite alot on Blavasky and came to (my own) conclusion that it seems she insinuates that greedy arrogant slefish people are semites--not that traditional semites (arabs jews etc) are greedy arrogant and power hungry. its constantly defined differently
TheGreatDeciever55 1 year ago
Why does the Theosophical Society constantly lie and use their lies to try and rewrite history? You people are all full of it and you should shut your mouths and look around you at the real world. You are an evil cult and nothing more.
myoldshorts 1 year ago
for millenia... we have to find out... specially that now are so many dangers in the world.... fuk you snake eater....... gandhi look a like theosophyst mada faker... but not in a bad way... its with love.... not racist... the gods.... jajjajajaj ... god is not anything antrophomorphic..... shes fucking out of her mind.....
checourtney 2 years ago
Completely incorrect. Hitler believed Guido von List who took Blavatsky's ideas, mixed them up with nationalistic and fascist ideas, and changed it into Ariosophy..
lana0037 2 years ago
Actually, this society was developed around 1876. Hitler did not practice this exact theology. He practiced a belief that Lizst put in place.
He took the ideals of the original society and jumbled them around to fit his opinions and beliefs.
lana0037 2 years ago
What about the belief of ATLANTIS
nibus9 2 years ago
Theosophist and anthroposophists like to speak, speak and speak, about all kind of things... but the world is moving further without them....
sjokolade147 3 years ago
Instead of so much TALK-TALK-TALK why don't you people try to LISTEN-LISTEN-LISTEN? I'm referring to the endless, squabbling commentaries from people that think that they are so smart. Also, philosophy/theosophy/theology is not the property of the rich (or the poor, for that matter), rather, it belongs to anyone that seeks to KNOW; period.
narayanr 3 years ago 4
training cant be done being slave of words created by untrained man!:)so the woman is just untrained person repeating nice words over and over leading nowere!
supralee 3 years ago
noone will be saved, accept the very rich & 'plenty of time ones'! Who is OUR saviour?? the christ of the common man??????! Because all the common man & woman does, is to feed the mouths of them rich! We are always struggling to make ends meet, who cares about religion, pilosophie, if we don't have time to think about it, & when our only worrie is to feed our mouths & our children!! where is the theosophical soc etc to save & help us with hope??? philosophie is a luxury problem.
strandneuker 3 years ago
this is the case when on talks constantly-be good, be very good and so on and enjoys this. but thing is simple talk without training is nice show and giving nothing to the listeners neither to her!
supralee 4 years ago
You don't have to follow the societies ways. The word itself has an impeccable etymology, and is suitable to mean what I talk about. I don't care about the squabble's of the corresponding governing body, so long as the basis of what they teach (or were supposed to) is proper.
OneRyt 4 years ago
Well that depends on who is defining 'proper'. Theosophy's teachings are primarily based upon authoritarian revelations, particularly HPB, and the word of the Masters whom only certain people (at the top) can hear. Typically, those who question the word of the Masters are accused of being under the influence of 'dark powers', welcome to the insane comedy that is theosophy, I suggest you do a little reading instead of ass kissing a useless word etymology.
alzico 4 years ago
Not once in my life have i found someone as ignorant as you since you dont know what the hell you are talking about and never did theosophy tech something you are trying to tell us here.
Vaenra333 2 years ago
read
krishnamurti.. a life
justcornelius 3 years ago
Yes, I should do that. I have a few other books to read ahead of me unfortunately before I can get to that.
OneRyt 3 years ago
Saying there are 'no dogmas' in the theosophical society is a bit of a double bluff if you ask me.
alzico 5 years ago
But it isn't. It's more of a thought of unity between all. Theosophy literally means Divine Knowledge. Divine knowledge entails all knowledge that has been gathered by humanity about its Godly origins. It represents a Unity of all, not a particular dogma which opposes any particular religion. We believe we can learn from eachother, which even Ghandi believed in.
OneRyt 4 years ago
How very idealistic, however Theosophy as a collective entity is a shambles home to ideas that could easily be construed as racist (see Leadbeater's Root Races). Simply, the language and teachings of theosophy are stuck in the Victorian age and having attended meetings myself this seems to be the way they want to keep it. Under all the empty rhetoric of universal brotherhood beats a religious heart, i.e. 'this way is the right way for all humanity'. They can keep it.
alzico 4 years ago
To me, there is a tendency in Theosophy to deny diversity of religious expression; religions do not all say the same thing, or say the same thing differently; there are differences, and a beautiful, rich tapestry of interpretation is also created, within each religion. We don't need religious Esperanto, but thanks for the offer!
zeit23geist 3 years ago
Where exactly did you find racism in Blavatskys and not Leadbeaters root races?
Read first!!! and then judge
3psaria 3 years ago 4