Okay, check this out. Blue Velvet was in the 80's. They didn't do product placement then. The first film to have product placement in the 80's was Back to the Future. Pepsi gave a fairly large amount to have it in the movie. Love the Pabst Blue Ribbon part though.
@aplotkowski3 Yeah, Heineken paid a decent amount so they got a shout. Bud paid a bit more, so they got a shout, and Heineken got called shit to set the equilibrium. The Pabst paid even more, so they get the last word above all the beers.
@aplotkowski3 I know it's the internet bro and context means a lot, but I was being sarcastic. There is no fucking way Heineken would pay to have their beer called shit in comparison to another.
"Hello Heineken, this is David Lynch. Just to let you know that we will accept your offer, but Bud payed a little more so we will still mention you, but we have to call you shit in comparison to Bud. I knew you'd understand, peace."
you've completely misrepresented him. In the film the fact that the character likes heineken is just another layer of his curiosity for things that are not at the forefront but deeper. you sir are a fool.
Like others have said, the beers had symbolism. It's really obvious. I mean, REALLY obvious. Also, it's only product placement if he got paid for it. So, Fail on your part.
It's not product placement. Do you think Heineken would have been cool would have been cool having Bud being described as the King of Beers five seconds after Heineken's intro in the movie? Or Bud being cool with the characters drinking Heineken while only talking about Bud?
I think whoever cobbled this video together has missed the point. He's clearly mocking product placement by doing it in a ridiculously brazen way. Did they get paid by Heineken? Probably, but it doesn't detract from the joke.
I used to think it's quite ironic, but am sure he had a good reason...like Dale Cooper and coffee and cherry pie in Twin Peaks, I am sure he just wanted to added another quirk to this character...either that or he was actually parodying the rather un-subtle nature of product placement in films...maybe he was trying to do both
You do realize it's mostly knocking the fact that beer drinkers are always like "OH MAN I SURE DO THINK MY BEER IS THE BEST DON'T YOU?!" But hey. Whatever you wanna think guy...
I like how he tells it like it is. Anyway, the American Midwest has some of the best craft breweries in the world. Heineken isn't bad and neither is Pabst. Nor are they spectacular. If you ask me, Crazy Ed's Chili Beer pwns the piss out of both of them. So does Okocim. And Rogue. And Sam Adams. And Mad Anthony. And Belhaven. Some say Heineken and Grolsch are "skunky," but that depends on individual taste. To me, they have somewhat of a bite, but aren't skunky (skunky implies lack of freshness).
This is such a dumb video, in Blue Velvet not only were the beers representations of the characters like "davidbruno films" stated, but even if you dont look deep you can see that the characters are both promoting and dissaproving of the different brands....why would heineken pay for product placement when its both refered to as "shit" and shown as lower quality in comparisson to bud? THINK, THEN POST.....david lynch rocks.
If the inference is that Heineken paid for product placement in Blue Velvet, it may be the first time a sponsor's promoted their product with the phrase, "Fuck that shit!"
David Lynch talks about learning from every experience. I think he acknowledges that he's done product placement, the same as he acknowledges that he's done commercials... "to make money". It doesn't mean he doesn't despise product placement and think that it's "bullshit".
Even if it was a standard product placement deal, he made it part of the story. Some research into the pp agreement might even render the video's argument moot (not that I care enough to do it myself). I vote Lynch not not a hypocrite based on creativity alone.
I do not like people judging a person based on the things they've done years back, in different circumstances. He himself might've thought that it was BS that he used product placement in a film of his, just did not feel the need to share it with the entire world.
Big FAIL...the beer conversations and references were used to make a point about commercialism in postwar America and how "brands" became a part of ones identity to the point of it becoming built into the following generations feelings about American vs.European culture. It's metaphor for the whole film actually - a tale about naievete thrust into a world of chaos and arbitrary violence and evil.
Big FAIL...the beer conversations and references were used to make a point about commercialism in postwar America and how "brands" became a part of ones identity (ex. ..."he can't be a man because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me.") to the point of it becoming built into the following generations feelings about American vs.European culture. It's metaphor for the whole film actually - a tale about naievete thrust into a world of chaos and arbitrary violence and evil.
Big FAIL...the beer conversations and references were used to make a point about commercialism in postwar America and how "brands" became a part of ones identity (ex. ..."he can't be a man because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me.") to the point of it becoming built into the following generations feelings about American vs.European culture. It's metaphor for the whole film actually - a tale about naievete thrust into a world of chaos and arbitrary violence and evil.
The interviewer is asking how Lynch feels about using product placement as a way to gain funding for films. Lynch never asked for a dime from the beer companies before or after the film was made.
Haha! Good one...however, I feel like the shout-outs of these various beers are relevant to the story, as a creative decision...rather than involuntary advertising. But, good effort!!
This video is total fucking bullshit. He mentions Bud, Heineken and PBR because he wanted to not because he had to. Pop culture references are in many films. PBR should send Lynch a check anyway. This film probably did sell a shitload of that stuff.
Lynch didn't get paid by beer companies anymore than Tarantino got paid by McDonalds for the whole royale with cheese scene in Pulp Fiction...not buying it...
But what is this Stianang saying here? Did lynch receive money from Heineken or any other beer company for these references that are made in Blue velvet? Pretty hard to have a conversation about beer without talking about the various brands
I don't know what everyone is talking about. I doubt Lynch got budget support to advertise Heinken. Do you know the meaning of product placement people? He got no money for it.
bubmarley said it. there's a difference between what lynch does here and actual product placement. referencing a brand name that has cultural significance and adds to the depth of the characters has artistic value where pure product placement doesn't. PLUS, in order for it to truly be product placement he would have had to receive funding from the company who's product was in the film. i doubt that was the case here.
@subtleflection It's really no different than the beers here. They're used for a greater purpose, to show these people's standing, the backgrounds they come from, what they choose to use. Also, you can't just have a brand-less car, people recognize it even if you take the logo off. I don't think they were even new models.
The Heineken/PBR opposition is part of their mutual character development. Jeffrey likes Heineken, which shows us that he is kind of watery and weak. Frank insists on drinking PBR instead of any other beer, demonstrating to the audience that he is utterly depraved, degenerate and insane.
i´m a filmmaking student and i would totally make my characters fight about wich beer is better. We are people, we fight about wich beer is better! It´s only natural.
I can't believe that people use this to get back at Lynch. He blatantly is dissing all the beer brands. Now you want a product plug? Vin Diesel in Fast and the Furious.
"You can have any brew you want. As long as its a Corona."
Now where is the scene where Paul Walker says to Vin, "Corona? Fuck that. Maybe thats what your ass likes to drink. I want Bacardi on the rocks, with a twist of lemon. Doused with diet coke or coke brand soft drinks. You know. Because I'm a classy guy."
First of all it was used as a metaphor in Blue Velvet, thus it served a purpose. Just because you name a real brand in a movie/TV show doesn`t make it product placement.
In the interview, Lynch was referring to REAL product placement, like getting paid by a compony if you place their products in a movie.
Heineken represents the middle-class beer (Kyle's character) who lives in the peaceful town of Lumberton, Frank's character drinks PBR because blue ribbon is a lower-class/ disgusting cheap beer. This choice of symbolism depicts a "you are what you eat" message or in this case "you are what you drink". So i would have to disagree with this video and say that it was more than just a simple product placement.
@davidbrunofilms agree with ya, this vid is obvious manipulation. if you pay attention to the film, then these references make sense (and are hilarious, i still use them today!)
@davidbrunofilms Pabst actually isn't too awful. It certainly isn't excellent or anywhere near on-par with a "real" pilsner like Okocim, but an ice cold Pabst on a hot summer's day isn't half bad. Only good chilled, though, whereas Okocim is good chilled or "warm." Keep in mind, what we Americans called "warm," by European standards, is actually cellar temperature.
There's a reason he used heineken, pabst, and bud in the film. It was to differentiate the personalities of the characters. Pabst and sociopath just go together so well. Heineken goes well with the character because it shows he has an interest in finding new and exciting things (Heineken was it at the time). Bud can describe the plain and association with the ordinary.
Interesting. My interpretation is that he's making fun of the concept of product placement, just as he makes fun of the concept of hardy boys/ nancy drew/ teen love movie/ and the portrayal of white picket fence America in films.
This is silly, and I'll tell you why. If the mention of beer in "Blue Velvet" was an example of product placement, it would be the only beer that anyone in the film drinks. People who pay for product placement pay for exclusive product placement. They don't pay to have their product compared to other products.
well, those scenes in blue velvet were entertaining, he may have just needed a beer name. if not that was years ago and... just dont judge david lynch... hes a badass
Well, to quote Monty Python: American beer is like making love in a canoo ....fucking close to water!
ffrooos 1 week ago
The video's not dumb to me, it's marvellous.
Which means top comments can be shit.
TiborosTube 3 weeks ago
Heineken?! Fuck that shit! Pabst! Blue! Ribbon!
BBnanner 1 month ago
heiniken is like drinking your own piss
Ionisus 1 month ago
dickhead poster
DitchReality 1 month ago
dont get pissy this was fucking hilarious
evilfinchman 1 month ago
Okay, check this out. Blue Velvet was in the 80's. They didn't do product placement then. The first film to have product placement in the 80's was Back to the Future. Pepsi gave a fairly large amount to have it in the movie. Love the Pabst Blue Ribbon part though.
rbh1138 2 months ago 2
FUCK THAT SHIT!
PABST BLUE FUCKING RIBBON!!!!!!
Kuato19 2 months ago 8
have you retards ever considered that it was product placement for all the beers included, Heinekein, Pabst, Bud? Just matters who pays the most...
aplotkowski3 2 months ago
@aplotkowski3 Yeah, Heineken paid a decent amount so they got a shout. Bud paid a bit more, so they got a shout, and Heineken got called shit to set the equilibrium. The Pabst paid even more, so they get the last word above all the beers.
You're the fucking retard here.
DannyVenomous 2 months ago
@DannyVenomous so i'm retarded because you took the time to rephrase what i said....oh. fuckhead.
aplotkowski3 2 months ago
@aplotkowski3 I know it's the internet bro and context means a lot, but I was being sarcastic. There is no fucking way Heineken would pay to have their beer called shit in comparison to another.
"Hello Heineken, this is David Lynch. Just to let you know that we will accept your offer, but Bud payed a little more so we will still mention you, but we have to call you shit in comparison to Bud. I knew you'd understand, peace."
DannyVenomous 2 months ago
@DannyVenomous touche, but in all seriousness. why else would they say heineken; clever product placement? i have my doubts.
aplotkowski3 2 months ago
Dumbass video
noisthat 2 months ago 2
Poor guy has no choice!! Not really up to him! Still a genius though...
poisonproductionzz 2 months ago
you've completely misrepresented him. In the film the fact that the character likes heineken is just another layer of his curiosity for things that are not at the forefront but deeper. you sir are a fool.
davidpeake1 2 months ago
I'm pretty sure Lynch actually loves heineken beer in real life.
spjohnso 2 months ago
Like others have said, the beers had symbolism. It's really obvious. I mean, REALLY obvious. Also, it's only product placement if he got paid for it. So, Fail on your part.
heatherskitty75 2 months ago
The poster of this video is stupid. The different brands of beers are not mentioned for advertsing purpose, but for symbolic purposes.
jraoul711 3 months ago
PABST BLUE RIBBON
Urmean15 3 months ago
Be polite!
SuperSpanishChicken 3 months ago
It's not product placement. Do you think Heineken would have been cool would have been cool having Bud being described as the King of Beers five seconds after Heineken's intro in the movie? Or Bud being cool with the characters drinking Heineken while only talking about Bud?
Badjokessoldhere1 3 months ago
Comment removed
YesImACunt 3 months ago
It's funny too because David makes commercials as well..........so wtf?
P.S. his Gucci one rules.
shitttty 4 months ago
way to miss the point, dickhead
blaklodge 4 months ago
I think whoever cobbled this video together has missed the point. He's clearly mocking product placement by doing it in a ridiculously brazen way. Did they get paid by Heineken? Probably, but it doesn't detract from the joke.
84richhoward 4 months ago
@84richhoward
If he did get paid that is product placement and hypocrisy. I doubt he got paid.
help4343 3 months ago
I get what you're saying but I don't think PBR would have wanted Frank Booth as their spokesperson.
waarde2 5 months ago
I used to think it's quite ironic, but am sure he had a good reason...like Dale Cooper and coffee and cherry pie in Twin Peaks, I am sure he just wanted to added another quirk to this character...either that or he was actually parodying the rather un-subtle nature of product placement in films...maybe he was trying to do both
SROCeallaigh 5 months ago
FUCKING CELL PHONES
generalcircle 5 months ago
You do realize it's mostly knocking the fact that beer drinkers are always like "OH MAN I SURE DO THINK MY BEER IS THE BEST DON'T YOU?!" But hey. Whatever you wanna think guy...
DeadCrescendo 5 months ago
Fuck Heineken! PBR!
MRLoQual 6 months ago
Just because a product is placed in a movie, doesn't make it product placement.
zofspade 6 months ago 4
I like how he tells it like it is. Anyway, the American Midwest has some of the best craft breweries in the world. Heineken isn't bad and neither is Pabst. Nor are they spectacular. If you ask me, Crazy Ed's Chili Beer pwns the piss out of both of them. So does Okocim. And Rogue. And Sam Adams. And Mad Anthony. And Belhaven. Some say Heineken and Grolsch are "skunky," but that depends on individual taste. To me, they have somewhat of a bite, but aren't skunky (skunky implies lack of freshness).
IggyHazard 7 months ago
Well if you knew what product placement really was, you'd know that Blue Velvet didn't have any.
Bumblebeest 8 months ago
This is such a dumb video, in Blue Velvet not only were the beers representations of the characters like "davidbruno films" stated, but even if you dont look deep you can see that the characters are both promoting and dissaproving of the different brands....why would heineken pay for product placement when its both refered to as "shit" and shown as lower quality in comparisson to bud? THINK, THEN POST.....david lynch rocks.
venom13194 9 months ago 34
If the inference is that Heineken paid for product placement in Blue Velvet, it may be the first time a sponsor's promoted their product with the phrase, "Fuck that shit!"
SubconsciousGatherer 9 months ago
Funny, but its not simply product placement,
eddyc09 11 months ago
David Lynch talks about learning from every experience. I think he acknowledges that he's done product placement, the same as he acknowledges that he's done commercials... "to make money". It doesn't mean he doesn't despise product placement and think that it's "bullshit".
codeastronomer 1 year ago
King of beers MY ASS!
nunobelo 1 year ago
funny! they missed one though: during the scene where jeffrey sneaks into dorothy's apartment, he takes a leak and you can hear him say "heineken".
tbzeee 1 year ago
mentioning product name =/= product placement
devourerofbabies 1 year ago
This was mean, low punch mate, I like Zillertal btw
MaghoxFr 1 year ago
man Heineken tastes like shit id rather drink Milwaukee's best
Dayberry 1 year ago
Even if it was a standard product placement deal, he made it part of the story. Some research into the pp agreement might even render the video's argument moot (not that I care enough to do it myself). I vote Lynch not not a hypocrite based on creativity alone.
Parkyurkarkas 1 year ago
So they're not allowed to mention real beer in movies? \:-|
MRCAB 1 year ago
Irony... please understand it.
smaug88 1 year ago
I do not like people judging a person based on the things they've done years back, in different circumstances. He himself might've thought that it was BS that he used product placement in a film of his, just did not feel the need to share it with the entire world.
STorpedo 1 year ago
uploader is a retard
psnapplebee 1 year ago
Big FAIL...the beer conversations and references were used to make a point about commercialism in postwar America and how "brands" became a part of ones identity to the point of it becoming built into the following generations feelings about American vs.European culture. It's metaphor for the whole film actually - a tale about naievete thrust into a world of chaos and arbitrary violence and evil.
aaronredcat 1 year ago 3
Big FAIL...the beer conversations and references were used to make a point about commercialism in postwar America and how "brands" became a part of ones identity (ex. ..."he can't be a man because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me.") to the point of it becoming built into the following generations feelings about American vs.European culture. It's metaphor for the whole film actually - a tale about naievete thrust into a world of chaos and arbitrary violence and evil.
aaronredcat 1 year ago
Big FAIL...the beer conversations and references were used to make a point about commercialism in postwar America and how "brands" became a part of ones identity (ex. ..."he can't be a man because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me.") to the point of it becoming built into the following generations feelings about American vs.European culture. It's metaphor for the whole film actually - a tale about naievete thrust into a world of chaos and arbitrary violence and evil.
aaronredcat 1 year ago
that little bastard
thatmovieguy777 1 year ago
The interviewer is asking how Lynch feels about using product placement as a way to gain funding for films. Lynch never asked for a dime from the beer companies before or after the film was made.
SpeakToMe19 1 year ago
i think he only did that in the film so Frank Booth could say "fuck that shit!"
BROKENHOUSEFILMS 1 year ago 3
A) this is funny
B) like @davidbrunofilms said, the beer choices reflect character class
C) every beer that is named & complimented is also explicitly dis-valued by some other character
D) lynch never sought to receive a dime from Heineken, Bud or PBR while writing his script
E) I'll take 3 PBRs over 1 bud/heine any day hoes
TheOCEANisMusic 1 year ago 5
Haha! Good one...however, I feel like the shout-outs of these various beers are relevant to the story, as a creative decision...rather than involuntary advertising. But, good effort!!
daltondeuce 1 year ago
This video is total fucking bullshit. He mentions Bud, Heineken and PBR because he wanted to not because he had to. Pop culture references are in many films. PBR should send Lynch a check anyway. This film probably did sell a shitload of that stuff.
thefilmjock 1 year ago
Lynch didn't get paid by beer companies anymore than Tarantino got paid by McDonalds for the whole royale with cheese scene in Pulp Fiction...not buying it...
scotscar 1 year ago 13
I like Heinken and PBR, all I know is David Lynch is brilliant.
blackadder3 1 year ago
It doesn't really matter if Lynch was paid by Heineken or Anheuser-Busch or Pabst, cuz it's still a funny bit of satire.
MrStephenRGilman 1 year ago
But what is this Stianang saying here? Did lynch receive money from Heineken or any other beer company for these references that are made in Blue velvet? Pretty hard to have a conversation about beer without talking about the various brands
PlazaMoon 1 year ago
@PlazaMoon Good point. Also, Hopper's famous line seems to be a parody of commercialism rather than an advertisement in itself..
immutabledude 1 year ago
I dislike this video because it is stupid.
wilsham 1 year ago
that was funny.
theillfrisch 1 year ago
Heineken? Fuck that shit! PABST BLUE RIBBON!
EhrgeizUnlimited 1 year ago 3
Nice try but you'd have to prove that Heineken or Pabst paid David Lynch for that, which I highly doubt.
Chaduke 1 year ago
He may just like Heine.
BucksStudent 1 year ago
I always thought the character Dennis played liked PBR because it's an all American brew with him being a redneck and all but I could be wrong.
go0fy11137 1 year ago
You're right about that.
Gossage54 1 year ago
I don't know what everyone is talking about. I doubt Lynch got budget support to advertise Heinken. Do you know the meaning of product placement people? He got no money for it.
Tigerlily21 1 year ago
bubmarley said it. there's a difference between what lynch does here and actual product placement. referencing a brand name that has cultural significance and adds to the depth of the characters has artistic value where pure product placement doesn't. PLUS, in order for it to truly be product placement he would have had to receive funding from the company who's product was in the film. i doubt that was the case here.
todossomosanimales 1 year ago
Exactly. This isn't product placement. I guarantee he didn't get a dime from Heineken, PBR or Bud.
Gossage54 1 year ago
and what about car companies in lost highway? (mercedes and ford, if i'm correct)
subtleflection 1 year ago
@subtleflection It's really no different than the beers here. They're used for a greater purpose, to show these people's standing, the backgrounds they come from, what they choose to use. Also, you can't just have a brand-less car, people recognize it even if you take the logo off. I don't think they were even new models.
metalgear012001 1 year ago
this vid is exactly what ive been thinking since i saw lynchs comment on product placement.
lifeisstupid 1 year ago
He fucking rules!
professorchaos1963 2 years ago
Heineken? Fuck that shit! Pabst blue ribbon!!
dilps 2 years ago 4
theres a difference between sullying your movie with product placement and talking about beer. people talk about beer in real life.
plus
we're talking about david fucking lynch.
he is art
bubmarley 2 years ago 3
The Heineken/PBR opposition is part of their mutual character development. Jeffrey likes Heineken, which shows us that he is kind of watery and weak. Frank insists on drinking PBR instead of any other beer, demonstrating to the audience that he is utterly depraved, degenerate and insane.
wurblewurble 2 years ago 6
Isn't it possible that Lynch was using those popular beer brands to demonstrate the absurdity of commercial competition?
immutabledude 2 years ago 2
lolololololol
aka321 2 years ago
fuck whoever interviewed lynch
B0BtheBaptist 2 years ago
that doesnt mean its product placement just because he MENTIONS heineken..its called CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT..did you read the screenplay??
chelseaislovely 2 years ago 2
i´m a filmmaking student and i would totally make my characters fight about wich beer is better. We are people, we fight about wich beer is better! It´s only natural.
laresistance77 2 years ago
heineken sponsored lynch in part for the film, providing he included that line
emceewhiterabbit 2 years ago
chill out people. the maker of the video is just having fun. (i thought the video is funny too)
QueenBeeJulie 2 years ago
Lynch is the man!!!!
product placement my ass
ugotpimp 2 years ago 5
I can't believe that people use this to get back at Lynch. He blatantly is dissing all the beer brands. Now you want a product plug? Vin Diesel in Fast and the Furious.
"You can have any brew you want. As long as its a Corona."
Now where is the scene where Paul Walker says to Vin, "Corona? Fuck that. Maybe thats what your ass likes to drink. I want Bacardi on the rocks, with a twist of lemon. Doused with diet coke or coke brand soft drinks. You know. Because I'm a classy guy."
WallyWadeMovies 2 years ago 3
It would be bullshit if he made any money for saying Heiniken.
cromagnonmonster 2 years ago 8
The uploader doesn't know what product placement is.
crieff405 2 years ago 65
LMAO.
Chuckjagermeister 2 years ago
First of all it was used as a metaphor in Blue Velvet, thus it served a purpose. Just because you name a real brand in a movie/TV show doesn`t make it product placement.
In the interview, Lynch was referring to REAL product placement, like getting paid by a compony if you place their products in a movie.
omaha82 2 years ago 7
Blue Velvet was made 1986
Maybe he has learned something in the way.
Funny clip thou
metyyra 2 years ago
Heineken?!
Fuck that Shit!
Bumblestick 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ha ha. David Lynch looked guilty when he answered that question. Just look at his face. And the way he answered it... the man doth protest too much.
DollfaceK 2 years ago
Heineken represents the middle-class beer (Kyle's character) who lives in the peaceful town of Lumberton, Frank's character drinks PBR because blue ribbon is a lower-class/ disgusting cheap beer. This choice of symbolism depicts a "you are what you eat" message or in this case "you are what you drink". So i would have to disagree with this video and say that it was more than just a simple product placement.
davidbrunofilms 2 years ago 83
This comment has received too many negative votes show
...or, you could just admit that David Lynch is a hypocrite.
sophomorictrash 2 years ago
well put. that's what i immediately gathered from those clips. people are just dumb.
KE5HOB 2 years ago
@davidbrunofilms heeeeeey! I LOVE PBR!
Jason1584 1 year ago
@davidbrunofilms agree with ya, this vid is obvious manipulation. if you pay attention to the film, then these references make sense (and are hilarious, i still use them today!)
blough27 1 year ago
@davidbrunofilms Pabst actually isn't too awful. It certainly isn't excellent or anywhere near on-par with a "real" pilsner like Okocim, but an ice cold Pabst on a hot summer's day isn't half bad. Only good chilled, though, whereas Okocim is good chilled or "warm." Keep in mind, what we Americans called "warm," by European standards, is actually cellar temperature.
IggyHazard 7 months ago
@davidbrunofilms no shit...
don't take this too seriously
CptSpauIding 4 months ago
Heineken and PBR are both used in Blue Velvet as a specific metaphor that symbolizes Kyle M.'s character and Dennis Hoppers character Frank.
davidbrunofilms 2 years ago 9
ouch!
did he, or didn't he
i don't think he did
tubebeliever 2 years ago
Haha great video. Bur seriously, as long as Heineken doesnt pay him, its not a product placement.
skibidido 2 years ago 2
There's a reason he used heineken, pabst, and bud in the film. It was to differentiate the personalities of the characters. Pabst and sociopath just go together so well. Heineken goes well with the character because it shows he has an interest in finding new and exciting things (Heineken was it at the time). Bud can describe the plain and association with the ordinary.
paluka 2 years ago 4
Interesting. My interpretation is that he's making fun of the concept of product placement, just as he makes fun of the concept of hardy boys/ nancy drew/ teen love movie/ and the portrayal of white picket fence America in films.
mondosolorzano 2 years ago
Frank loves blue velvet; Frank loves Pabst "Blue Ribbon." Just reinforces the image of the swaying blue curtain and Frank's fetish.
Baby loves blue velvet.
dubododia 2 years ago
haha, nice.
time2stand 2 years ago
Ha ha. Listen to the way that little dickweed asks his question.
johnnytastetest 3 years ago
Lost highway had the ford logo on the screen for a tad bit too long, now that was obviously paid for.
This... not too sure, iffy.
uberscientist 3 years ago
This is silly, and I'll tell you why. If the mention of beer in "Blue Velvet" was an example of product placement, it would be the only beer that anyone in the film drinks. People who pay for product placement pay for exclusive product placement. They don't pay to have their product compared to other products.
originalfunkyfry 3 years ago 11
you forgot the best part:
Jeffrey taking a piss in Dorothy's toilet groaning "HEEEEEIIIINNNEEEEKEENNNN" while holding his dick.
Atlas2112 3 years ago 3
Those scenes are not product placement in the sense they are speaking of.
wifflemaster45 3 years ago
@wifflemaster45 how?
relyanddefy 1 year ago
well, those scenes in blue velvet were entertaining, he may have just needed a beer name. if not that was years ago and... just dont judge david lynch... hes a badass
amazingblur 3 years ago 34
He sure is ;)
stianang 3 years ago 7
Syns forøvrig du kan slette de to andre videoene du har, så du har et videotek du kan være stolt av!
janjens 3 years ago
Haha, genialt Stian. :D Ikke dårlig, faktisk. Tid har dere i alle fall nok av på psykologien?
janjens 3 years ago
Blir så kreativ av det, vettu :P
stianang 3 years ago