Added: 3 years ago
From: BongHitBrian
Views: 562,316
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (512)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is not North Vietnam, but 30 miles over the border into Laos

  • Giap played the long hand and won.

  • HENRY KISSENGER IS BASTARD. He used the left over junk bombs @ WW2 to dump out to VN. He killed 52,000 american soldier heroes. Then, sold VN to China to make an urgly trade.

    I don't understand why he got the nobel price for peace? Who knew this story, please tell me.

  • Run Charlie!

  • still lost Vietnam

  • @zeppirl as a result of B-52 bombing of Hanoi in Dec of 1972, the North Vietnamese signed the peace accords in Paris. We vacated the country of virtually all troops, they choose to violate the treaty, esp with Nixon in trouble. The liberal democrats choose to cut off aid to S. Vietnam... Never a military defeat, but yes, lost Vietnam in a political defeat of an ally losing. Nixon if not in trouble in 74 would have sent the B-52's back in to put the fear of God in the N. Vietnamese..

  • @irish89055 loss is a loss...move on its history now. tho never glorify a loss as victory

  • @zeppirl who's glorifying a loss... It was never a military loss, something the US has never had... losses in battles, yes, though not in Vietnam. The US press has been calling the veterans that fought there losers for 36 years. I don't know your age, you don't seem to have a profile(could be the dumb youtube changes) but I lived the era and feel the injustices to the veterans and stupidity of people like Nixon and Kissinger and their actions..

  • lovely...

  • @irish89055 damnnnnmmmm

  • my father , god rest his soul, was part of that raid

  • PAkistans Jf17 thunder already kikd his ass last year ..

  • A hundred!! That is actually a scary thought, i'm surprised the lads on the ground did'nt just give up and go home.

  • wow, those trees blowd up real good

  • What is a difference between the Vietnam's era B-52 and now?

  • @Hperman09 nothing really the cockpit has probably been upgraded though for night missions, and all the bells and whistles of todays planes

  • and this is what we shoul do to iran now now f them asshole they are going to start a world war soon when they get the nukes to work we all will see what kind of rats they are

  • "We train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won't allow them to write "FUCK" on their airplanes because it's obscene"

  • World biggest weapon laboratory!?

  • Charlies dont SURF!

  • Wondering why US politicians, generals and soldiers, with such powerful killing tools, eventually lost the war to North Vietnam guerrillas ?

  • @CYTL1960 generals and soldiers didnt lose the war, the politcians lost this war, thank nixon and watergate.

  • @CYTL1960 we didn't lose. We quit. The politicians made us quit.

  • @rammjet666 is quitting and losing the same thing?

  • @cd949604 no because if I kick your ass and then I quit, I'm not the loser. You are.

  • @rammjet666 ahh now it makes sense to me

  • @cd949604 we did lose in a sense - the politicians caving into public pressure, pulling out troops and not finishing the job.

  • tons of bomb... to take down some trees

  • Do these bombs explode from impact?

  • @AllofVideos Yes, in a way - they have a trigger in them that sets them off once it hits the ground.

  • Why does it shake?

  • @HaloModder555 What shake? The video? Probably because it's hand held? The plane also shakes a bit because those bombs are heavy and cause weight shifts when they are released.

  • What? No not that stuff.

  • lol,we knew how to make the Taliban surrender even before we even got involved with em'.

  • I wonder if that drop killed 1 person

  • To find a comment from the comments section do this:

    1. CTRL+F

    2. Write the words you are looking for.

  • Get some!

  • I used to watch B-52's flying ti Vietnam when I was a kid.They were fying out of fairchild AFB over seattle....

  • Great, i have to find SirRetku's comment lol

  • @TheFukinesedragon Me too. LOL Took me 6 minutes to carefully find it

  • @TheFukinesedragon His comment was Reuters journalist was among people carrying AK`s so it was his own fault.

    Iraqies put children in cars for "human shields."

    Black ppl are enslaving scandinavians today by coming to our countries as "refugees" and then living on taxpayers money doing nothing themselves but fuck and drink.

  • @Nickizdaboss It's not worth doing in the current wars. In wars like ww1 and ww2 it didn't matter as much because of the large amount of enemy soldiers but in wars like Iraq the majority of them are civilians.

  • @dethklok6511

    Haha, large amount of enemy soldiers in german cities? Oh no, thousand and thousands of german civilians died from either bombings or massive firestorms. Surely would be considered warcrimes if it wasn't the bloody victor who was doing it.

  • Maybe this is a dumb question but why dont we bomb cities anymore during war?

    Like they used to carpet bomb cities like germany and japan,

    How come we dont do that in war anymore?

  • @Nickizdaboss because its inhumane. america wants to be the police of the world. so to do that we try to keep innocent casualties either secret, and/or low. if started bombing cities with the type of war we wage. which is against terrorist groups and not a country than the UN would be all over us and so would be the world. but lets say we started war with china. then we would start carpet bombing again, and maybe even nukes. its just the type of war thats waged nowadays has changed.

  • @Nickizdaboss We were trying to avoid civilian casualties in all wars, but during WWII, we didn't have smart bombs, so they would look for the target, and aim for majority of the bombs release to land there. Although it seems like it was just massive bombing runs on cities, the bombers did have certain targets. Today we have smart bombs so we can avoid the massive loss of civilians.

  • @Nickizdaboss

    Most stupid question i've read in a while, great job!

  • @Urindunk Excuse me asshole? I was wondering why we don't like we used to too drop morale and obviously your a fucking genius so tell me the EXACT reason why.

    This is what fucks up YouTube, Assholes who think there shit doesn't stink and think they know absolutely everything.

  • @Nickizdaboss

    The exact reason has already been explained to you, you fucking mongoloid. Not that a halfbrained monkey wouldn't be able to figure out why in this day and age we dont just bomb random cities to shit... and learn your fucking language for Christ sake, you stupid kid.

  • @Urindunk Learn my language? Lmao anyway I understand when I was first explained so what would make you write a slanderous comment?

    Your a fucking idiot who plays Call Of Duty.. Come on.

    Dont comment back im busy. K? Bye :)

  • @Nickizdaboss Learn the difference between there/they're/their and your/you're.

    I don't play Call of Duty.

    Fuck off.

  • @Urindunk My bad lol you play FPS games. Lawl.

    THANKS! Finally you leave me alone!

    I wont even lie im 16 and I dont really know the difference's between those and im sure lots of people dont.

    Bai bai.

  • @Nickizdaboss

    hahahahahhaha

  • @Nickizdaboss there is a position such as "He is over there.", they're is and abbriviation for they are such as "They're already home." their is showing ownership such as "It is their cat". your is again showing ownership such as "This your bag", you're is an abbriviation for you are such as "You're a home owner." dont feel bad though, many foriegn people dont know the difference just thought i would help :)

  • la drang. thats where Capt Williard hooked up with harrison ford for the briefing in apocalypse now.

  • to all the people who are saying this is a carpet bomber. its a fucking tactical bomber!

  • they ruined somebody's day or life!

  • smart bombs are cool and all but I prefer the kill everyfuckingthing method!

  • Jungle juice.

  • @NakenKenguruTiss That's because we were busy fighting in Japan, dude. The Japanese were the main threat to the United States during WWII, and we mainly focused on supression of Japanese forces so they couldn't launch an attack on the U.S. We did help with the Russians' invasion and helped them push Germany back, but once we were basically done with the war in Japan, the Russians started sending aid. So we did fight everywhere, and the Russians did too. It's even.

  • Emptying your bomb load on "suspected troop concentrations' in the jungle, almost but not quite like jettisoning your bombs into the ocean.

    Try to find in the films archives: a cluster of bombs stitching an NVA runway, obliterating the North Vietnam dike system, hitting the shipping docks of Haiphong, or Hanoi covered with bomb craters.

    You won't find any because of rules of engagement.

    We lost that war because we never intended on winning it.

    We played Giap's war of attrition and he won.

  • @rampking1 we never actually declared war, you are right that we never intended on winning but our job was to help train and protect the south vietnamese, we did what we said we would do in a process called vietnamization, we did not completely lose the war, our side lost but we did what we said we would do. The treaty of paris of 1973 said both sides would cease to advance and fire and america would withdrawl, ending the war. all sides agreed but after we had left, the nva continued to advance

  • @waldowatcherno298 I know of the facts you mentioned and agree with your entire reply.

    Yes, technically it was not a war but a conflict ...unless of course you were deployed there.

    We have no argument.

    Thanks

  • AMERICA!! FUCK YEA!

  • What a shame about humanity

  • Thật kinh hoàng!!!

  • droping shit

  • run Charlie!

  • there go my tax dollars

  • @quarterexchange Well, as they say, opinions are like assholes; everybody has one. You have yours and I have mine. Let's just leave it at that.

  • @quarterexchange 1) We are not responsible for the genocides committed by every dictatorship in the world.

    2) Yes, it did; the Vietnam War had a devastating effect upon our economy. 3) Read some history, Ho Chi Minh admired the United States and we promised to keep the French out---we lied. 4) Yes, Reagan quickened the process, but by now the Soviet Empire would still be gone anyway. If Vietnam was a hot battle in the Cold War and we lost but won the war, the battle was unnecessary.

  • @quarterexchange Okay, point by point: 1) We did not secure a capitalistic south east Asia but we still have those countries as trading partners today. 2) The Vietnam War all but ruined our economy and set us on the road to the inflation we still suffer today. 3) Ho Chi Minh's troops fought as allies of the USA against the Japs in WWII. We promised we would not allow the French to recolonize Vietnam, then reneged on that promise. 4) Communism died of its own dead weight, we did not kill it.

  • @quarterexchange Yes, China is largely a capitalist society while still retaining an iron grip on its domestic affairs. They are doing a lot of things right while we are doing a lot of things wrong, and the greatest irony of modern times is that we Americans are floating our own economic system by borrowing money from Communist China. As for the 3 million dead in Cambodia....read my lips: I DON'T GIVE A SHIT. We can't police the whole fucking world and if they kill their own people, so be it.

  • could we please talk about the plane and not make up stupid conspiracy theories about america seriously you people have no lives

  • @xzenicax What the fuck are you blathering about? This is a video about B-52 strikes on North Vietnam and you're ranting about Yugoslavia? And what's your message? Yugoslavia is going to kick America's ass? Well thank you, I needed a good laugh today. The country who built the YUGO is going to kick ass on the country who who built the B-52 strato-fortress bomber.....yeah right! LMAO Yugoslavia isn't a country anyway. It was a collection of ethnic provinces that splintered when Tito died.

  • @JackKangaroo1 He is trolling other Vietnam war videos. His dirt poor country wouldnt do shit.

  • @commentmutant Thank you, and, yes, I suspect he's some Serbian yahoo who's still pissed-off that we put his country's former boss, Sloppy-Dan Milosoviszc, out of business. [Note: probably spelled Sloppy-Dan's last name wrong but who cares, all those names sound like sneezes when you say them anyway.]

  • WAR? What war? I don't recall Congress ever "Declaring" War. Article I, Sec 8 clause 11 (Congress shall have the power to.... declare war). I remember LBJ and the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" (HJ1145 - Public Law 88-408) Aug 7, 1964. And yes, I remember it. There is a wall between the Relecting Pool and Constitution Ave with over 58,000 names of those who died unjustly, of which 2 are of name, blood and family with me.

  • @crcausey True, Congress never had the guts to even formally declare war but as those 58,000 names remind us, it was the real deal when it came to death and destruction. I'm a baby boomer and though I never got called up for the draft and avoided the whole mess with a high lottery number, this bullshit fiasco in Vietnam was the one really rotten thing that the World War II generation did to my generation. Stop Communism? Today China is our biggest trading partner.

  • wow

  • PWNAGE

    

  • The war was lost in the halls of Congress, not on the battlefield. Tragically, the generals running the war did not stand up to the politicians and tell them we can't win; there was no strategy to win. President Johnson knew the war was not winnable back in the early 60's when Robert McNamara presented him with a position paper telling him the US could not win. I was there 1971-1972 as an advisor to the ARVN. Still could not get them to fight after 10 years. Time to close shop and go home.

  • @bonnerje EXACTLY ! And that's what nobody seems to understand. That there was never any intention of actually winning the war. After all, how do you win a war? You CONQUER the enemy, right? This would have meant invading North Vietnam and taking control of Hanoi, much as we did in 2003 with Baghdad in Iraq. Instead we had the "DMZ" and an endless series of hill conquests that were almost immediately abandoned to the enemy. It was an un-winnable situation from the start.

  • @JackKangaroo1 today, the US is waging wars in the ME well beyond the mandated goals and intention of Congress. but the Pentagon plan is to continue fighting indefinitely. the political elite in America feel the best way to prevent another 9/11 is to create a magnet conflict "over there". like moths to the flame, the extremists make the Hajj to fight and kill GIs, versus their attempting to attack the mainland. BTW, i think 9/11 is very suspicious (why exactly did WTC 7 collapse ?).

  • Yeah!!! Pure american democracy!

  • woooo imagine the b-52 doing a carpet bomb with nuclear bombs........ DEADLY

  • @DaScorpi0n you must be 7 years old.

  • @EnterTheKmylo lol no im 14 i was just joking

  • Take that rice munchers!!!

  • dropping some democracy there.

  • @haavardlill Dead Gook is a Good Gook

  • call of duty comes to mind anyone ? lol

  • Comment removed

  • @sexking83 Go Hug A Tree you F****T, Get a life it's just a Comment on youtube !!!

  • @MadStylezuk umad?

  • @sexking83 you Gay ?

  • @MadStylezuk ahaha crying?

  • US deaths in Vietnam war = 58,000

    North Vietnamese deaths in Vietnam war = 1,176,000

    Like shooting turkeys.

    America didn't even loose, the war was between North Vietnam and South Vietnam.

    America helped the South, and then due to lack of support from the American public for the war they left.

    They were not militarily beaten, they just quit.

  • my uncle al haig said that we dint lose the war, we quit.

  • b52 pooping death

  • @The61769 LOL

  • dont mess with the us airforce:P

  • Better plan: send a million troops right from the start and invade North Vietnam, put them out of action by bombing levees, dams, aqueducts, etc. to cause massive flooding, famine, plus roads, railways to disrupt shipment of food, medical aid. Then declare any relief given will be considered act of war against SV unless North stops all aggression, including support for Viet Cong. Uncle Ho and pals probably flee with most supplies anyway.

    Would have won the war that way, if we'd been serious.

  • how many bombs are in the bomb storage? are they limitless?

  • @pjm5678

    No they're not limitless! Bomb load would depend on the variant of B-52, range, type of target being hit etc..

    But your looking at around 70,000lb of ordnance (according to wikipedia anyway) carried internally and on wing racks. Mostly the Mk.80 series of bombs ranging from 250lb to 2000lb, or M117 750lb bombs. From the 80's onwards they can carry cruise missiles and currently smart-bombs like JDAM's. The 52's a very useful long range bomb truck, hence why its still in service.

  • @pjm5678 im just joking. I know there not limitless. It just looks like that it has an unlimited supply of bombs.

  • how manybombs are in the bomb storage? are they limitless?

  • 0:17, *Kid from Vietnam looks up,* "HOLY SH----" (Couldnt finish sentence before going to hell)

  • @xBlackOpsTV you better be talking about a kid from "northern vietnam" at the time. Cuz if ur not then I'mma gonna have to kill you.

  • I think a large part of our American involvement in Vietnam was just that we thought it would be easy. We figured that we were a superpower going up against a little primitive backward country in SE Asia....how could we lose? Well, we found out the hard way that having more planes and more bombs and more guns and more weapons of all kinds doesn't mean shit when you're up against a determined enemy adept at guerrilla warfare and determined to kick your ass out of their backyard.

  • @JackKangaroo1 Too bad we didnt learn our lesson...

  • @stupidfleshmonkies Well I think we did get somewhat gun shy after Vietnam. Let's face it, we'd have to be a nation of total retards to not have learned something. But, yes, I do think we should butt out on a lot of these little proxy wars going on around the world, like the current situation in Libya. Let the people of Libya get rid of their own dictator. Why get involved in any of that shit?

  • @JackKangaroo1

    ) No one ever thought it would be easy least of all our generals.

    3The NVA and VC lost > 1,000,000 killed us 55,000 KIA

    4)The North Vietnamese never won a major engagement against US forces

    5)The NVA and the VC were tough but the reason we abandoned the effort had NOTHING to do with their tenacity it was about China or Russia entering the war Victory via invasion was never an option.

    6) when finally allowed to bomb north of the DMZ we wrecked their country in 12 days

  • @1138thz 1) Politicians thought it would be easy, guys like JFK for instance

    2) you had no # 2 (skipped math class that day?)

    3) estimates of NVA & VC KIA very suspect

    4) True, but after Tet in 1968 we knew they were a force to be reckoned with

    5)China & Russia had no plans for active roles in VN / true invasion of the North was never considered an option, so how could we possibly ever have won?

    6) yep, blew their country to smithereens but they still chased our butts out of Viet Nam anyway

  • @JackKangaroo1 Ah yes..by 1965 we had been fighting Communism in Eastern Europe

    Korea, China, Cuba, Guatemala, Greece,...we had witnessed the Red Army and 300 Divisions..

    we watched Red China go nuclear..we watchec thousands of Russian ships offloading

    millions of tons of military cargo in Haiphong harbor..we saw that ever weapon of the enemy

    was produced in the USSR..but..we were just dull witted bullies picking on a tiny

    defenseless country. Yep thats all it was about. Moron

  • @871yt Did North Vietnam ever attack the United States? Have they ever attacked the United States since they took over South Vietnam in 1975? Did Vietnam, North or South, ever present a threat to the United States in any conceivable way? Isn't China our biggest trading partner today? Duh!!! But don't worry, there is hope for people like you. Recent advances in medical science may soon make it possible for you to have your head surgically removed from your ass.

  • @JackKangaroo1 you just cant beyond "big bad USA" against the little guy mentality probably

    because you see yourself as a victim..and every form of authority or tradition as

    "oppressive" North Vietnam was a proxy for the USSR..just like Korea, or Poland

    or China, or Hungary. The really Amazing thing is that America had the guts to stand up to

    this for decades..alone for the most part. But that is a form of courage that is utterly alien to you.

  • Comment removed

  • @871yt now you know why it was called "The Cold War", and most were proxy wars you dimwit. 

  • @commentmutant And they were proxy wars because a direct confrontation between USA and USSR would have meant the end of the planet in about 45 minutes. The proxy wars were a way to stop Communism by

    blocking it at every turn and waiting for the USSR to collapse..which it did

  • @871yt And I agree with you on that 100%. I think we did a good job as well, look at South Koreas economy in comparison to vietnam.. Its laughable. the proof is there.

  • @commentmutant Our former enemies in WWII

    Japan is the #2 economy in the world

    Germany is the #3 economy in the world

    South Korea is 1000x as rich as North Korea

    The Soviet Union is gone completely

    Cuba is a collapse dirt poor island where nothing works

    Red China however is doing great..because our traitorous leaders have

    sold them everything with which to kill us.

  • @JackKangaroo1 Hahah, you didn't do your history homework at all :)

  • @JackKangaroo1 actually we won in a different way. they killed 58000 americans we killed 1.2 million vietnamese. plus they were backed by china and the soviets.

  • @JackKangaroo1 except that the US did not lose the military war in Vietnam / SE Asia. but Congress grew weary of a conflict which never seemed to end and pulled the plug on the war machine, finally.

  • @stybarrow Congress?...Congress? The war was lost because of a Soviet funded

    Far Left here in the USA..led by people like JohnKerry and Bill Ayers and Jane Fonda

    who instead of being imprisoned as traitors were awarded by the Far Left media as heroes.

  • @871yt there is a wealth of documentation and deposition on the Vietnam debacle available to anyone truly seeking answers. Youtube is fun for hyperbole and objective exasperation.

  • @stybarrow The Leftist lies about Vietnam is still the standard version taught in

    Academia and the Media.. every year the degree to wich the apparatus of the Left

    went to distort the situation in Vietnam and deliberately drive America into a defeatism

    is more clear. We saw it again..in the Lefts Pavlovian reaction tot he Iraq War...remember?

    "Just Like Vietnam..its just like Vietnam....." it wasnt it..but the Lefts hatred of

    America is pathological.

  • @JackKangaroo1 Amen. They won fair and square, and you have to respect them for that.

  • Anyone know where this clip is from?

  • enemy carpet bombing spotted take cover!

  • is it bigger than a ac130? and no, i'm not plyaind cock of doody

  • @madgunner01 basically no, but they are different

  • U.S is giving presents to the VC and North Vietnamese

  • Weres all the flames?

  • you people do realized America isn't the only country in history to do horrendous things right? every nation that came to be didn't do it through love, but greed and selfishness; so that goes for England, Japan, China, Russia, Germany, Spain, and so on.

  • @Demon5I7

    examples of those countries horrendous acts ?

  • @fiestavan09 ok, japan evaded Korea almost destroying the whole culture completely, England colonizing in north Africa and India oppressing them and taking there resources. Russia invading afghanistan for oil, we all know what Germany did back in 1939, the Spanish invading the Americas and whipping out the Indians such as the Aztecs; do i need to go on?

  • @Demon5I7

    you missed out china awww the little yellow people they havent done anything bad really, have they ?

    but the others all happened for good reasons :D

  • @fiestavan09 china has turn Tibet into hell, destroying there environment, so your saying its acceptable for England killing off populations and ravaging resources but not other countries? I'll admit America has done things that far from acceptable but no were near as horrible as England did throughout history. i guess i would expect someone who still lives under monarchy to believe the propaganda your government spreads, good day to your sir.

  • @Demon5I7

    thats the way it was back then gotta do what they had to do. think if they didnt do that i might not be living in my amazing 4 bed house with dinner on my plate everyday and a warm bed to sleep in ..hmmmmm nice

  • To all people out their say: "you US cunts you bomb and kill innocent civillians" Have you actually read history, or just listned to people around you. Do you know how much time we took to make sure we were not going to kill any one innocent in these bombings? Read history before arguing because it makes you look like a dumbass. Also, I have no idea were you get the nerve to say that stuff if your from a dif country because i shure would not want to be you if you were ina war with us.

  • 100 B-52s, oh dear lord that's just a giant swatch of destruction through the Earth.

  • Vietnam ass holes get out of this planet!

  • @taiwangogogo2011 shut up you punk ass, read a bit of history, than come back, you dumbass

  • @5IrFaN5

    What I learned is USA killed lots of vt soldiers, that's a good thing to me! LOL

    Long live united states of america!

  • @taiwangogogo2011 a lot of viet soldiers killed Americans too, war just sucks

  • @NakenKenguruTiss there is reason third world countries are third world they are inhabited by stupid and lazy such as your self stop using US and euro inventions you low life third world scum

  • damn

  • comment section poll results are in...

    98% of people who look up anything which contains the word "bombing" on youtube have violent tendencies and want to kick someones ass.

  • @jwboll Or they play Call of Duty :)

  • dude..

  • @NakenKenguruTiss Wait we cost 4 million civilians lives?

    I believe we weren't mass murdering our own allies for no apparent reason

  • @NakenKenguruTiss ... are you fucking kidding me? no country in the world wants a war with the united states military! no other country has such sucessfull special forces as we have!.. america will kill its own ppl for a war(9/11) and no country NO COUNTRY wants to fuck with us... you know nothing of us military personel

  • god i love america, haters gotta hate tho

  • @NakenKenguruTiss haha, sure. and even IF that happens, what is the alternative?

    Think. China is the next big kid on the block. what if THEY decide to start flexing towards central Europe and there is no US to push back? you know how they handle occupied territories (Tibet). take your pick, but we are the lesser of two evils.

    so bend over and take it. your piggy-bank on the shelf doesn't count as "surplus".

  • @NakenKenguruTiss yeah, well its called a "worldwide economy" for a reason, you ignorant jackass. we go down, you're coming with us. we've been in worse before (Great Depression) and we're still here.

    and we'll STILL piss in your face to put you out after napalming the shit out of your gay little countries.

  • @NakenKenguruTiss maybe i haven't changed, but neither have you.

    and im not sick, i just dont give a fuck. because that is the reason that the US is the most powerful nation on earth: we DONT give a fuck about your shitty little countries. burn, motherfuckers, BURN. Hail Satan.

    (oh, btw, you've been TROLLED)

  • we could have won this war,but for what,we lost 50,000 men,we showed the world how much freedom and equal rights meant to us.Had the south been 100 percent against the North,it would have been done.We couldn't bomb the North into the stone age,it just couldn't be done.But it hurts to think 50,000 soldiers gave there life for nothing,but they didn't,the world remember's them.

  • @NakenKenguruTiss dont give me that "US is the Great Satan" bullshit.

    if we REALLY wanted to genocide the fuck out of a group of people, dont u think we could do it a LITTLE better? (Stalin, post-WW2, 23,000,000 kills to that guy, if u include Ukraine)

    we are trying to make things better. MAYBE WE'RE FAILING, i'll be the first to admit it. but we are NOT intentionally causing the deaths of civilians. leave that to the sick fucks who blow themselves up in the middle of a market for "Allah".

  • @NakenKenguruTiss dont I know it, im russian by descent. no need to get so butthurt dude.

    i was talking more about the cash-and-carry plan that kept the UK supplied during the blitz.

    ADDITIONALLY, the germans came SO CLOSE to winning anyway that , had the US stayed in its own hemisphere, the germans probably would've run roughshod over Europe and Asia.

    (in summary, it was a combined effort, but the US tipped the scales because it was the last major combatant to join.)

  • DIE VIETCONG !

  • xD the rolling thunder of black ops :D

    i know im a fanboy^^

  • Reuters journalist was among people carrying AK`s so it was his own fault.

    Iraqies put children in cars for "human shields."

    Black ppl are enslaving scandinavians today by coming to our countries as "refugees" and then living on taxpayers money doing nothing themselves but fuck and drink.

  • @SirRetku You are Nazi. Die in a gas chamber, resurrect, and then die again from polonium poisoning.

  • @mayrozjack Hitler was right.. he just had the wrong demographics...

  • @SirRetku fuck you, you bigoted fascist

  • @Saxophonic I speak bad english but is a bicoated fascist a good thing?

  • @SirRetku No

  • @SirRetku Trololololol