Hey Superman... so... you have some balls of steel... i always think in the negative and reverse... so... let's try to get the solid magnetic balls to drop down instead thru a tube of air, the air comes out of the bottom and helps rotate two large magnets on a wheel which push the balls back up to the top. Won't work. Anytime an object falls or rolls down, it takes more energy to put it back to the starting position. unless you've overcome gravity. Please feel free to see my ROCK JUMP video.
@Moneymax3001 Not sure that you understand the concept . Magnetic balls? Magnets? What part of floating balls in a tank of water doesnt overcome gravity?
Won't work for several reasons, starting with the 2nd law of thermodynamics. There's no way to get more energy out of a system than you put in. Perpetual motion devices are as such impossible, let alone 'over unity' devices. You need to calculate the losses in the system, inclusive of the efficiency of the drive belt and generator and all the friction losses of each of the bearings in the system.
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
@ooootehnutjobbery don't know if my comment posted but in case it didn't get your damn second law out of here. its already flawed by simply throwing gravity into the mix. oh and something that runs for 1000 years than stops isn't perpetual motion. nobody said anything about perpetual motion i'm 18 and i can see the flaws in the almighty 'second law'
I'm sure that the energy for input the balls in the tube is more or equal with energy provided by arhimedic force. Is ok but the second low of thermodinamics work perfect here. In this way you haven't an over unity device.
Hey Superman... so... you have some balls of steel... i always think in the negative and reverse... so... let's try to get the solid magnetic balls to drop down instead thru a tube of air, the air comes out of the bottom and helps rotate two large magnets on a wheel which push the balls back up to the top. Won't work. Anytime an object falls or rolls down, it takes more energy to put it back to the starting position. unless you've overcome gravity. Please feel free to see my ROCK JUMP video.
Moneymax3001 9 months ago
@Moneymax3001 Not sure that you understand the concept . Magnetic balls? Magnets? What part of floating balls in a tank of water doesnt overcome gravity?
simmo59 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
lutherarao 1 year ago
Won't work for several reasons, starting with the 2nd law of thermodynamics. There's no way to get more energy out of a system than you put in. Perpetual motion devices are as such impossible, let alone 'over unity' devices. You need to calculate the losses in the system, inclusive of the efficiency of the drive belt and generator and all the friction losses of each of the bearings in the system.
ooootehnutjobbery 1 year ago
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
turkeyguy0 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
turkeyguy0 6 months ago
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
turkeyguy0 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
turkeyguy0 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ooootehnutjobbery you people that always come in with your 2nd law of thermodynamics are educated dumb people who lock the truely smart ones away for the rest of their lifes to keep your small achievements looking massive. perpetual motion is impossible yes. but gravity is an energy caused by a giant magnet if you will. so if you used a constant force like gravity... you do not have perpetual motion. however, you will be able to overcome energy input.. its been done thousands of times.
turkeyguy0 6 months ago
@ooootehnutjobbery don't know if my comment posted but in case it didn't get your damn second law out of here. its already flawed by simply throwing gravity into the mix. oh and something that runs for 1000 years than stops isn't perpetual motion. nobody said anything about perpetual motion i'm 18 and i can see the flaws in the almighty 'second law'
turkeyguy0 6 months ago
It would be very hard to get the floating steel balls into the bottom of a tank without a great amount of leakage.
I can see how all the losses could be overcome, and how this could work, however it would be the size of a skyscraper, well two with the conveyer!
Nice idea
Can101276 1 year ago
the work consumed on a ball in order to push it into the cylinder (without leakings..) is equal with the work gained "by Archimedes" .
m*v*v/R is a nice nonlinear..
marestejar 2 years ago
I'm sure that the energy for input the balls in the tube is more or equal with energy provided by arhimedic force. Is ok but the second low of thermodinamics work perfect here. In this way you haven't an over unity device.
Nice for try. Good luck in studies.
simion7gabriel 2 years ago