@brianhar100 WOW you are so wrong it is carbon monoxide detector not co2, Humans can easily live at 10,000 parts per million. Co2 is a good plant food and that's why greenhouses incense it to 500 parts
@brianhar100 Wow thinking about it YOU do not know the difference between carbon monoxide and co2 but you think you know enough to preach that co2 is a problem
@busguy100 You need to get a hobby other than being a "31" year old troll going around arguing the opposite of everyone's ideas. Its sad and you are making yourself look like an idiot. CO2 is a deadly gas and IS considered a pollutant gas in certain amounts. The EPA, an organization whos entire job revolves around this subject addressed it as a rising health hazard and as a pollutant in high concentration. There are BOTH CO2 and CO detectors not just one or the other.
@JoesEpicAdventures co2 is not a deadly gas and the EPA made that decision after only 2 weeks of study, which was a political motivated policy not based on the best sciences like it should have been. co2 is not in high concentration it is only 380 to 1,000,000 a very minor trace gas. Sure you can get both detectors BUT the co2 one is for commercial application not for home use. Brainhar100 is like most AGWers who really does not know much so that's why he thought carbon monoxide was co2
@busguy100 And yes it is a green house gas which is why its bad moron in the concentrations it is today, its directly linked to increases in global temperature. Its not a good thing unless there are enough plants to level out the concentration and there isn't anymore.
@JoesEpicAdventures There is no proof that co2 drives temp, co2 always has followed temp both up and down by an average of 800 YEARS which makes it a effect of temp not a driver. Have you ever looked at a real temp co2 graph? If you do you will see that co2 is increasing but temp goes up and down, now get a graph of co2 and PDO they run in lockstep.
i dont think its happening because the temperatures of the oceans havent changed in years. i think all f the world will be the same for the next 50 million years.
It is sad that people are far more interested in the creationist debate than the threat of global warming. As serious as religious misinformation is it is trumped by the threat posed by global warming.
The effects of climate change are all ready visible in many places. I took a special course of the Baltic Sea and it's preservation, and all though at the moment pollution is the biggest problem it got, climate change is also mentioned in the top threats to the Baltic environment. The fauna and flora there are very sensitive and there are only few species.
Many of them are variations of the inhabitants of the Atlantic, but with great genetic differences.
Thank you SO much for making this. The original video seemed very suspicious--the data didn't look like what I'm used to seeing. Thank you for explaining why that was, lol.
Thank you very much...I know the video is crappy but my points are valid and supported by actual and recent data.
That said, I sincerely suggest that you go see the actual data, which there are links to in the info box to the right of the screen. At the bottom you can also find a link to "the cassiopeiaproject´s" old and misleading data.
I hope you are entertained by your own utter ignorance and idiocy. If not, what is to be gained from your existence?
You are expelling Co2 that is killing the planet and everyone on it. I am surprised you spend so much time on your computer and using electricity, you know, doing all those things that cause global warming.
Apart from the poor timing and quality issues (your debunks go by too quickly and are too hard to read when paused), this was a good series. I'm surprised you didn't mention the La Nina at the end of 2007 when discussing their final "graph" (which can be shattered by showing the counter-argument: Truncate the graph at 1998 and look what happens over the previous year!)
By the way, they answered their warming question with "No", "Yes", and "Don't worry about it", not just a dodge.
Yearh, thank you, I thought I would sort of skip all the analyzing and just show that they have picked all the wrong material, so as to point out that they have no idea what the heck they are talking about.
And yes, the "No/Yes" is just a camouflage that I plan to expose in the next video.
As of now, I´m 95% certain that They made the video with money from the "Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine". Though it could be that they are a just a subsidiary.
You did a great exposing the lies on the video. I was going to point out that much of the science is still a little fussy and that more data is needed to make a real conclusion but you already pointed that out. There is a lot of smear science out there so it alway good to have people like you correcting them.
Thank you very much. I am contemplating, making another version of this video, as I forgot a lot of things and I do not think it actually works. There is something terrible wrong with the flow.
But obviously these "couch" experts know better. Hilarious and problematic, when their viewers swallow this sort of propaganda without digesting it.
The message to these "spawners and distributors of foolish misconceptions" : Keep your silly conclusions to yourself, please. You are misleading people, not educating.
It is startling that people would go to such lengths to try to dismiss something so evident. It just shows that some people feel threatened to their twisted beliefs and homegrown absurd interpretations of cause and effect, and at the same time manage to refuse to look at actual facts and listen to the wisdom of competent and highly intelligent people who dedicate their lives to studying climate science.
Great round of weaving out and exposing manipulative lies that stand in total contrast to factual reality. Good work JRBendixen, you are doing humanity a favour shining a light on fools (with followers) like this.
ah dont worry just keep pumping out pollution it wont hurt us not!!!!
brianhar100 10 months ago
@brianhar100 co2 is not a pollution
busguy100 8 months ago
@busguy100 co2 isnt the only poison being pumped into the air and if you think co2 isnt pollution then why do you need a co2 detector in your house
brianhar100 8 months ago
@brianhar100 WOW you are so wrong it is carbon monoxide detector not co2, Humans can easily live at 10,000 parts per million. Co2 is a good plant food and that's why greenhouses incense it to 500 parts
busguy100 8 months ago
@brianhar100 Wow thinking about it YOU do not know the difference between carbon monoxide and co2 but you think you know enough to preach that co2 is a problem
busguy100 8 months ago
@busguy100 You need to get a hobby other than being a "31" year old troll going around arguing the opposite of everyone's ideas. Its sad and you are making yourself look like an idiot. CO2 is a deadly gas and IS considered a pollutant gas in certain amounts. The EPA, an organization whos entire job revolves around this subject addressed it as a rising health hazard and as a pollutant in high concentration. There are BOTH CO2 and CO detectors not just one or the other.
JoesEpicAdventures 8 months ago
@JoesEpicAdventures co2 is not a deadly gas and the EPA made that decision after only 2 weeks of study, which was a political motivated policy not based on the best sciences like it should have been. co2 is not in high concentration it is only 380 to 1,000,000 a very minor trace gas. Sure you can get both detectors BUT the co2 one is for commercial application not for home use. Brainhar100 is like most AGWers who really does not know much so that's why he thought carbon monoxide was co2
busguy100 8 months ago
@busguy100 And yes it is a green house gas which is why its bad moron in the concentrations it is today, its directly linked to increases in global temperature. Its not a good thing unless there are enough plants to level out the concentration and there isn't anymore.
JoesEpicAdventures 8 months ago
@JoesEpicAdventures There is no proof that co2 drives temp, co2 always has followed temp both up and down by an average of 800 YEARS which makes it a effect of temp not a driver. Have you ever looked at a real temp co2 graph? If you do you will see that co2 is increasing but temp goes up and down, now get a graph of co2 and PDO they run in lockstep.
busguy100 8 months ago
The Arctic has melted before, when it was WARMER than today. ...........................Google - SCIENCE-SKEPTICAL MWP . (First link).
camcheck 1 year ago
text differcult to read, red not a good colour, and to fast to read.
hector3222 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i knew global warming wasn't true.
Lanlordcan 2 years ago
I´m afraid its a fact the it is happening
JRBendixen 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i dont think its happening because the temperatures of the oceans havent changed in years. i think all f the world will be the same for the next 50 million years.
Lanlordcan 2 years ago
What you personally think is rather irrelevant . Try visit "the royal society's " web page on climate change. Just do a google search.
JRBendixen 2 years ago
Sry, I meant personal speculation not "thoughts"
JRBendixen 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you seem uneducated
wheresthebody 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is sad that people are far more interested in the creationist debate than the threat of global warming. As serious as religious misinformation is it is trumped by the threat posed by global warming.
Johannwyss82 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The effects of climate change are all ready visible in many places. I took a special course of the Baltic Sea and it's preservation, and all though at the moment pollution is the biggest problem it got, climate change is also mentioned in the top threats to the Baltic environment. The fauna and flora there are very sensitive and there are only few species.
Many of them are variations of the inhabitants of the Atlantic, but with great genetic differences.
pienipaha 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you SO much for making this. The original video seemed very suspicious--the data didn't look like what I'm used to seeing. Thank you for explaining why that was, lol.
Capook 3 years ago
Thank you very much...I know the video is crappy but my points are valid and supported by actual and recent data.
That said, I sincerely suggest that you go see the actual data, which there are links to in the info box to the right of the screen. At the bottom you can also find a link to "the cassiopeiaproject´s" old and misleading data.
Cheers :)
JRBendixen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My remarks were intended for JRBendixen and anyone else suffering the same guilt.
digitodd 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I hope you are entertained by your own utter ignorance and idiocy. If not, what is to be gained from your existence?
You are expelling Co2 that is killing the planet and everyone on it. I am surprised you spend so much time on your computer and using electricity, you know, doing all those things that cause global warming.
digitodd 3 years ago
If you must know, I am spending my professional life furthering the building of more energy efficient buildings.
So you see this is not something, I´m doing nothing about. But I am only one person and there is only so much I can do.
Further more I am spending some of my free time, expelling some of the globally spread nonsense about climate warming.
Is that enough for you? No, then email me. I may even make a video about it :)
JRBendixen 3 years ago
digitodd,
So what's your trip?
Why all that projected rage?
You think there isn't a problem out there?
You think human's are innocent bystander upon this finite (limited) planet?
Wish your type would look at your reasonless (...well, st least misplaced) rage for a change.
citizenschallengeYT 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apart from the poor timing and quality issues (your debunks go by too quickly and are too hard to read when paused), this was a good series. I'm surprised you didn't mention the La Nina at the end of 2007 when discussing their final "graph" (which can be shattered by showing the counter-argument: Truncate the graph at 1998 and look what happens over the previous year!)
By the way, they answered their warming question with "No", "Yes", and "Don't worry about it", not just a dodge.
TempestStormwind 3 years ago
Yearh, thank you, I thought I would sort of skip all the analyzing and just show that they have picked all the wrong material, so as to point out that they have no idea what the heck they are talking about.
And yes, the "No/Yes" is just a camouflage that I plan to expose in the next video.
As of now, I´m 95% certain that They made the video with money from the "Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine". Though it could be that they are a just a subsidiary.
JRBendixen 3 years ago
I´m sry if my last comment did not make any sense, but I´m quite sick and my head fells like it is going to explode :)
JRBendixen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You did a great exposing the lies on the video. I was going to point out that much of the science is still a little fussy and that more data is needed to make a real conclusion but you already pointed that out. There is a lot of smear science out there so it alway good to have people like you correcting them.
sincerely phoo67
Djarms67 3 years ago
Thank you very much. I am contemplating, making another version of this video, as I forgot a lot of things and I do not think it actually works. There is something terrible wrong with the flow.
JRBendixen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
flow?
Djarms67 3 years ago
damn could you make the red text any fussier and flash faster?
please pauseing to read things is not part of a video.
actualy just no more text, just read it off for us plz.
UmakeMeCutMythroat 3 years ago
But obviously these "couch" experts know better. Hilarious and problematic, when their viewers swallow this sort of propaganda without digesting it.
The message to these "spawners and distributors of foolish misconceptions" : Keep your silly conclusions to yourself, please. You are misleading people, not educating.
nakedhand 3 years ago
It is startling that people would go to such lengths to try to dismiss something so evident. It just shows that some people feel threatened to their twisted beliefs and homegrown absurd interpretations of cause and effect, and at the same time manage to refuse to look at actual facts and listen to the wisdom of competent and highly intelligent people who dedicate their lives to studying climate science.
nakedhand 3 years ago
How very well said.
I think I will actually borrow your "cause and effect" line, in part 3 :)
JRBendixen 3 years ago
Great round of weaving out and exposing manipulative lies that stand in total contrast to factual reality. Good work JRBendixen, you are doing humanity a favour shining a light on fools (with followers) like this.
nakedhand 3 years ago
Thank you very much sir :)
JRBendixen 3 years ago