Sheffield University are doing experiments on a steam plasma doing nuclear fusion. Power with no carbon dioxide or plutonium. The latter is toxic to all life on earth. The former supports it.
@whereareyou222 so you know AGW only from gore's movie? and never actually took a look at scientific publications where Al plays absolutely no role? whenever one of you deniers spout this nonsense you are merely demonstrating your ignorange and the fact that you get your knowledge from TV....
1.Weather is far to complex, thus impossible for us to make long term predictions.(even the short term predictions are often wrong)
2.Even if we are causing the global warming, why spend millions to prevent it? we could spend those money to be prepared for it because we now change will come even if we do nothing wrong - it seems more reasonable to me.
3.If it will happen, i can`t agree with IPCC on the consequences. they are simply beyond logic and come in contradiction with nr.1
@PacificCircle1 x number of tons has been part of the con for a while
bottom line - co2 makes up 1/3 of a single percent of the atmosphere - its nothing, and despite a 150 yrs of use of carbon fuels,the change in co2 has been nada - ZERO
speaking of dumbasses, I wonder what plants use to make oxygen?
@wkwickham14 erm thats wrong, the CO² concentration has been increased by about 35% since the industrialisation. and yes it is only a small part of the athmosphere. that doesnt mean it has no influence. the influence it has is enormous.
@ThisIsRogueLiberty the sun activity has very stable cycles. and nontheless is the global average temp rising. because the sun is not the only thing to consider.
Please have a look at the Youtube Video of Save Planet Earth. The song is being established as an Anthem for all Green Supporters and hopefully everyone that will be attending Earth Day Events
@nutabambi nuclear plants are atm the best thing we have, and in regard to AGW surely the best solution as it releases almost no CO², but to claim it doesnt make any polution is wrong.
I'd like to find whoever took away global warming and invite them to help me chip away at the small glacier building up on my driveway and the small mountain of snow beside it too.
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
In 1970, when environmentalists were making predictions of man made global cooling and the threat of an ice age, what kind of government policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?
When Ehrlich predicted that England would not exist in the year 2000, what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent such a dire outcome?
Finally, what makes us think that environmental alarmism is any more correct today than yesterday?
This is a case of, “Do as I say, not as I do.” Al, and the other elitist in this film, will continue to live in their four mansions and fly on private jets and run up electric bills 20X of the rest of us. They have no intension of stopping their life styles to “save the planet”. Of course these people that want to kill off billions of humans to have the planet eco friendly, will not include themselves on that list. The rest of us, “the great unwashed”, to the elitists, will have to live in caves
Global Warming is a hoax. I'm sure that residents of Indiana will agree right now. This world has been brainwashed. I live in South Carolina and it has been very cold here. The coldest that I ever remember in my 48 years of this earth. Thanks, Clinton, Bush, Gore, and Obama for brainwashing the world.
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi Unlike the 4 that I named, I've got something to say: Richard Nixon was the most honest president that the US ever had. He was a man of integrity. He never would have lied like the other four have. May Nixon rest in peace in Heaven and may the afore-mentioned four go to another place when their day comes.
I really don't care about what politicians say on this matter. I find that to be quite irrelevant to whether or not global warming is happening and is mad made.
global warming has been cyclic all along. The world cools for 10 years then gets warmer for 10 years. Think of it as seasons(if you have cold winters and warm summers).
It's a shame people have to exaggerate the facts to support their position, such as in this video. Thanks to people like you the reputation of climate science is dented by this constant exaggeration by extremist environmentalists who don't have a clue about science and just like the idea of being self-righteous hippies that know better than everyone else. Otherwise known as the 'green movement'.
@stopglobalwarming08 I have a few questions most people never get to answering because the answers contratict popular belief. Maybe you can help?
1) Is the world is getting warmer?
2) What causes it?
3) Is it cyclical or linear?
4) Can we do something about it?
5) Should we do anything about it? Is it a bad thing?
6) What should be done? I think we only answered the first question, then skipped down number 5. Shouldn't we agree scientifically on the other questions first?
@Aanthanur "you are wrong" Gratuitous comment, equal answer: No, I'm not.
However, I will respect you and ask, wrong about which part? After all, I just summed up the entire debate in a short space, using the scientists' research and the reports that aren't political. With NASA returning temperatures and photos showing temps decreasing as CO2 increasing, as data shows warm weather has fewer deaths than cold, and the ICC admitting to cooking the results... hard not to agree we know little.
NASA also shows satalite images of increase in ice in Antarctica
ICC also states that they used "fudged" figures and tossed out realevant data showing temperature decline
Now, you can conserve all you'd like. I'm not stopping you. in fact, as a libertarian, I encourage you to do what you want to as long as you don't harm others or take away their liberties.
@Aanthanur "you are a conspiracy lunatic thats it" I also think you should look up "conspiracy". You'll find that I am quite the opposite, as I don't think there is a conspiracy. Just faulty data and people. See it isn't about conspiracies or "saving the planet" (The Earth will survive if humans kill off all humans). It's about natural rights. Your rights stop when they impeed upon my or other people's rights. So, talk and show data all you wish, but don't force people to your will at gunpoint.
@bsabruzzo you mean your right stops where it endangers my life? like when your huge CO² release will actually harm others?
and you know, since decades scientists publish their data and studies in peer reviewed journals, and they didn't see the faulty data.... but you, some random guy on YT, you have spotted it, and instead of publishing your findings in a peer reviewed journal, you moan about it on youtube..... lol
AGW is real, if you like it or not. and we have to reduce our CO² emmissions.
@Aanthanur "you mean your right stops where it endangers my life? like when your huge CO² release will actually harm others" Correct... but GW increases crop yeild and rainfall and habitable land. It reduces cold winters and deaths from hunger and hypothermia.
CO2 isn't the only cause of GW, and humans only produce a small fraction of CO2, and the actually estimates from the officials at ICC is 0.01 degree over 100 years. Not really a threat.
the negative impact are alot bigger than the possitve ones. We are the main cause. and regarding CO² we are the worst producers. nature has cycles, while we almost exclusively add CO² and dont take away from the equotation. And i dont plan to harm you, just to reduce the harm you do to the climate.
@Aanthanur "the negative impact are alot bigger than the possitve ones" Very much still debated and debatable: see my original post.
"We are the main cause... almost exclusively add" Not in reality. CO2 is a common part of the Earth cycle and isn't created out of nothing by humans. We use what already exists. The oil, methane and plants all exist and would release that carbon. The net is actually a loss of CO2 into space (see NASA). And all animal life produces CO2 via resperation.
@bsabruzzo in nature there are CO² cycles, CO² is added to the atmospere but also removed from the athmosphere. we do not remove much, we almost exclusively add CO². Yes nature adds alot more CO², like Oceans or forests, but they also take away much more and actually take away more than they add. we do the contrary. we add much much more than we take away.
@Aanthanur Your correct,there's a consensus among Gov. scientists/Professors whose funding comes from the UN or congress. There is no political divide about gravity is there!
@Aanthanur "add CO² and dont take away from the equotation" There have been very successful tests of CO2 "scrubbers" that take the naturally formed compound called carbon dioxide and turn it into oxygen and carbon "slag". When these have been brought to the environmentalists, they were all dismissed because it really isn't about CO2. GW is still an unknown and understudied problem we are trying to solve by "harming' others rather than seeking real causes and, if needed, solutions.
@Aanthanur "i dont plan to harm you, just to reduce the harm you do to the climate" Let's examine:
1) The climate is a closed system that reacts to all factors, thus we are a part and cant "harm" it by reintroducing an element back into it from itself
2) We don't know what is the cause or the true effect of GW (see original post)
3) By restraining another person's liberties, without evidence of harm, you are harming that individual, including financially or actiaon.
@bsabruzzo there is plenty of evidence of harm. for example in Tuvalu. they are giving up their island and new zealand agreed to take all citizens from there. So we have already harmed people.
@Aanthanur "there is plenty of evidence of harm" Not of a human causing harm, which is all a human can control (this isn't a comic book).
"Tuvalu. they are giving up their island" for many reasons. The evidence is due to rising sea levels, errosion, over population and, as is the case in the Pasific Basin, the sumergence of the ocean floor. man doesn't control any of those things.
In fact, GW is shown to stabilize the weather patterns, not create Ninos and Ninas, the greif of Tuvalu.
@Aanthanur "there are not many reasons, AGW is the only reason" So GW (what is the "A"?) is causing the tetonic plates of the planet to shift? That's a new one. I'll have to read up on that. And read more on how GW creates more people via birth rates. Hmmm...
@Aanthanur "decades scientists publish their data and studies in peer reviewed journals" Peer review was exposed by scientists in the ICC (the "global warming" guys people always quote) as manipulated to exclude those who don't agree with GW. The same peer reviewed journals concluded global cooling and an ice age was coming. NASA (who measures global temps) and ICC scientists admit to their faulty data and conclusions.
But "you, some random guy on YT" know they are all wrong and you are correct
@bsabruzzo source for "NASA (who measures global temps) and ICC scientists admit to their faulty data and conclusions." ?
they don't. Nobody showed them to be wrong at all. and show me a scientific publication that was peer reviewed in a respected journal that claims global cooling and ice age coming. Newspapers are not peer reviewed journals.........
@Aanthanur "Nobody showed them to be wrong at all" The GW hystaria from "An inconvienient Truth" is based on the "hockey stick" graph, created from ice core samples for CO2 and tree rings for temperature. This data doesn't match to modern temperature readings from NASA, according to both men who did the study.
As for the conclusions, follow the links to NASA on the Blaze web site...
@bsabruzzo LOL Mann actually never admitted anything of the sort, quite the contrary, several other studies confirmed it, and Mann himself had a paper in 2008 i think that was more detailed and confirmed again that the hockey stick is correct.
But it really doesn't matter what Al claimed in his movie. He is no scientist and has not one single published peer reviewed article on the topic. i dont talk about Al, i talk about scientists.
@Aanthanur "i dont talk about Al, i talk about scientists" You talk about 30% of scientists who agree with you. You don't talk about those who have offered alternative causes, who have demanded to have their names removed from the studies, or who never were scientists, but are counted on the "official" report, the basis for the legislation and hysteria.
A.Gore is mentioned because he is a symptom (or effect) of the debate, not the basis for it.
@bsabruzzo lol 30%? where do you get that from? there is only a hand full of scientists in the field of climatology that deny AGW, the vast majority is in agreement of AGW. since the 70's the vast majority of published stidues support AGW theory. and almost no credible paper denies it.
@Aanthanur You have to explain the "A" please.... as GW is a natural responce to natural processes. As the past decade has shown global temperatures to be stable of falling slightly, as sunspot activity matches up with increases in global temps and CO2 lags, as NASA's studies (in a peer reviewed journal) shows that Earth is releasing heat at a greater rate when the level of CO2 increases, as the actual measured temperatures don't always match ice CO2 and tree rings, I say study must continue.
@bsabruzzo sun activity nonsense i see..... debunked. the sun activity has relative stable cycles, temperatures not. you just are grasping at straws here.
@Aanthanur "debunked. the sun activity has relative stable cycles, temperatures not" Umm, yes, CLIMATE has decades and even centuries of stability. TEMPERATURE the way you are reffering to it changes by the minute.
Anyway, sunspot activity has been shown to have a closer corellation to global climatic trends. Not grasping here. Just pointing out an equally viable theory. in fact, the decreas in sunspot activity matches the past decade of level global tempuratures.
@Aanthanur "[solar warming] was shown to be wrong" It's interesting that the very same paper and debate that proves that solar activity isn't a cause for GW also included evidence that CO2 isn't suficient to cause the warming either. So your own defence provided a counter to your main assertion. (sketicalscience's website, biocab's site) And you either accept NASA's and NOAH's conclusions or don't. Don't cherry-pick them.
But my point it not the sun did it, but that there are other causes left.
@Aanthanur Let's see who has the open mind in this discussion:
Person A (me): sees errors, poor data and other opinions (interpretations of the data), goes to other sources when is challenges, then shares his doubts.
Person B (you); Says' it's AGW. only AGW. Asks a question that is answered by reading the links I pointed to. Still asks "what paper specifically " and demands peer reviewed studies, even when one is offered.
@bsabruzzo you said "the very same paper and debate that proves that solar activity isn't a cause for GW also included evidence that CO2 isn't suficient to cause the warming either."
I wondered which paper you are exactly referning to. why dont you just give me the title of the paper you have in mind?
@Aanthanur You know what ? I've played this game before with your kind,, I list one or ten papers and you shoot them down ,google it yourself , every reference I give you you'll have a prob with no matter the persons qualifications.
@Aanthanur Now, if you are saying that the science is definative and it can't change, I offer two more absolutes of science that can never change... and yet were proven wrong:
1) Gravity is objects pulling each other, where the largest object wins... wrong, it is a dip in space/time and things are falling into the distortion... um, wait, it's changinf again.
2) Nothing can go faster than the speed of light... wronge, light can go faster than itself if... wait, other particles can go faster...
@bsabruzzo i never claimed science is definitive and can never change, its science, not religion. so it can change, when evidence is presented. but that isn0t the case atm for the AGW theory.
@Aanthanur LIST OF CONSPIRACIES.....Yellowcake forgery,Iraq and weapons of mass destruction,Iran-Contra Affair,Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male,October surprise,Watergate ,CIA Operation Northwoods,CIA Operation Merlin this is a PARTIAL LIST of proven conspiracies did I mention JFK?
@davetileguy but when we talk about AGW, we talk about a world wide conspiracy of thaudends of scientists and hundrets of very famous scientific institutes around the world. that would be alot bigger than all the conspiracies you listed. and your listed conspiracies were alot smaller and were not able to be kept secret. so try again with your conspiracy nuttery.
@Aanthanur Ok buddy this is is how these debates usually go, your side knows everything and everyone else is dumb and ignorant ,just be aware of this ,when you come on my property to seize whatever it is you claim is changing the world ( My cattle,Hay,Truck ,Thermostat,black roof vs white,) I'm going to have a present for you! it's the ultimate argument ! it trumps Al Gores whining AND yours! if you want to come over now I'll give it to you early! Have a nice life!
@Aanthanur Expodential? like Earth will be the temperature of the sun? or hotter? there are no cycles or curves things just increase ? Droughts never end? hurricanes just get stronger and engulf the whole world? "do something" like stop volcano's from erupting and tundra from melting and releasing Co2? it is what it is deal with it.
To throw a new angle on this issue (to get off the same tired track): how many of you GW deniers believe the gov't story re: 911 vs alternate theories (no planes, missiles, holograms). I really have no strong feelings either way on who caused 911, because it makes no practical difference what one believes about it, unlike GW, which we can do something about.
@deskset24 I side slightly with the official gov't story. However, the who-caused-911 issue is the ONE issue where I DO feel sympathy for the opposing side. Where I do feel that those who believe 911-is-an-inside-job theory ARE oppressed more than "my" (or, rather, the gov't's) side.
Not so for GW. At all. There, the suppression of truth is done ENTIRELY by the GW-deniers OF those who know GW is real & serious.
Scientists who questioned mankind's impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.
They say the debate on global warming has been "hijacked" by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon Trading, Carbon Taxes, government (taxpayer) subsidies
@Dayversion And scientist who have accepted global warming receive death threats. They say the debate has been hijacked by a powerful alliance of politicians, a small number of scientists, and wealthy industrialists and corporations who make stuff up about the effects of CO2 emissions and their effects.
The difference is the 98% of climate scientists who agree with the IPCC can actually provide scientific back up for their position
Ignore the rest. Listen to the science. Global Warming is real
Leading US Physicist Labels Satellitegate Scandal a Catastrophe
In a fresh week of revelations when NOAA calls in their lawyers to handle the fallout, Dr Charles R. Anderson adds further fuel to the fire and fumes against NOAA, 1 of the 4 agencies charged with responsibility for collecting global climate temperatures NOAA is now fighting a rearguard legal defense to hold onto some semblance of credibility with growing evidence of systemic global warming data flaws by government climatologists
Get educated: anthropogenic global warming has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH AL GORE! It has been known for 100 years!
All the GW-deniers need to be forcibly castrated to prevent their inferior genes from reproducing and then be forced to live in Los Angeles forever on a day like today when it hit 113 deg F.
To the politically correct fuckheads: James Ray - isn't that the shithead who believed in "The Secret" bullshit and killed 3 people in a sweatlodge? If you mean that guy in the Discovery Channel, he was some rabid anti-immigrant protestor who hated illegal Mexican immigrants. But, at least he fought and died to end human overpopulation. I am not going to be silenced by politically correct assholes: James Lee whatever was a hero fighting for a noble cause, like any soldier.
Global Warming: There are people who want to steal big money. They want to build expensive windmill which fight GW. Of course they take your money by a TAXES.
Greenland's giant island of ice could pose threat to offshore platforms, shipping
.
It's been a summer of near Biblical climatic havoc across the planet, with wildfires raging in Russia and floods claiming lives across Asia. But the moment the Petermann glacier cracked — giving birth to the biggest Arctic ice island in half-century — may symbolize a warming world like no other.
Global warming is a hoax. Get educated, stop listening to government sponsored gold diggers. The earth is cooling, get ready for the big freeze coming this winter. Last winter was a holiday. Buy up snowplows. Buy up snowblowers. Don't be caught defenseless. It's going to be brutal
You will never see 350 ppm CO2 again in this century and that doesn't matter anyhow. Wake the fuck up you simpletons. The books are cooked and so is your goose. The world is cooling. Get off your computer dummy.
You do know nuclear power plants produce next to 0 CO2 emissions. Those big towers you see releasing stuff are releasing water vapor. It was also interesting to see how you think the entire world will flood from global warming. This I'm sorry to say is impossible, there isn't enough water. You also assume man is causing the global temperature to rise which is easily shown to be wrong.
CORRUPT gives less jobs then they will create more buldings to solve the problem then they will forget about earth and start hinking about money and fortune AND THEY WILl DIE FASTER .MONEY is just paper! with some stuff! think about 2060 and your dead and you have children you will just let them die alone themselves!! if ur gonna do that ur selfish and MONEY WILL NOT GO TO HELL OR HEAVEN! stop global warming so u will be a savior and god will be proud of you!!
@stopglobalwarming08 Sadly you've been brainwashed by one of the biggest morons in history, Al Gore. Prove to me how CO2 a gas which is essential for life is somehow destroying the planet? Tell me why every single computer model we've made and put to the test has been wrong? Tell me oh please just tell me why people like you keep spreading around this garbage like it's the bible and we are on the holy crusades.
@stopglobalwarming08 Typical. Read more. Al Gore is nothing but a wolf in a sheep's skin, and you my friend are the sheep. I don't dispute the fact that the earth can get warmer than it currently is. I dispute the fact that it's because of humans. CO2 is not a pollutant and you're a fool if you think it is.
@stopglobalwarming08 Hey where you in the Discovery,channel building today? Jake Lee?? Dude what the hell. Take your delusions out on your self. Dont kill anyone and explode a pipe bomb because of Al Gore stupid propaganda. "Ishmael" is just a story. Take your pipe bomb DOWN.
@stopglobalwarming08 you don't know what your talking about....im a geologist, 65 million years ago carbon level where 12 times higher and its thought global temps where the same or a maximum of 3 degrees higher and there might have been more abundant life than there is now....i.e this is when the dinosaur lived and all the oil we use was formed because there was so many living organisms...doomsday my ass
As long as these deniers keep up with their "I'm a ____, so GW is a fraud" crap, then they have no business complaining if I turn the tables on them and say,
"I'm a mathematician, so if you use numbers anywhere in your work, then my professional opinion trumps your opinion in (whatever area of expertise: law, military, medicine)."
@stopglobalwarming08 Scientific facts are to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome.Man made G.W. is a theory.
@davetileguy indeed a theory. a scientific theory, not just some hypthesis, its a theory. a theory is the highest one can get in science. a theory is able to explain all the observed phenomena. and AGW theory is able to do that.
@davetileguy a theory explains several facts. the facts are the temperature measurments for example. a fact is a observed phenomena. the theory is to explain those.
@Aanthanur Whatever, does name calling make you feel bigger ? LOL theory's explain facts??Scientific facts are generally believed to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome
.Reverse Scientific Method:
1)Draw your conclusion.
2)Select data,no matter how flawed,to support you conclusion.
3)Discard any data,no matter how valid,which does not.
@davetileguy Scientific facts are generally believed to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome
there is a scientific concencus on AGW theory as strong as the concencus on the theory of evolution. only a small fringe group is in denial.
@Aanthanur We're here , the temperature is rising , therefor it's our fault? I think they call that circumstantial evidence. good thing your not a lawyer!
@davetileguy no not because we are here, because we are releasing huge amounts of CO² by burning fossil fuels. we add additional CO² tot the natural cycle and this way bring the CO² concentrations out of balance, and this additional CO² is reradiating alot of heat. you should maybe read some scientific publications on this matter instead of making stuff up.
@Aanthanur Sigh.. here we go again,what have I made up? these are the arguments as your side has presented them. You have no idea what I've read ,how bizarre to make such a statement about someone you don't know.
@davetileguy oh dear, then you are just stupid. you said"We're here , the temperature is rising , therefor it's our fault?" i explained no not because we are here, because of our CO² emmissions. and then you claimed my side would claim because we are here and temps are rising therefor its our fault.
@Aanthanur I had it drilled into my head in 9th Grade biology. I think maybe the reason the college age kids (and younger) have all bought into global warming is that they were never taught anything about the scientific method and the difference between a theory, a proof, and a belief, and their teachers don't know anything about it, either.
@davetileguy AGW is a full blown theory. and there is no body in sight presenting a alternative theory explaining all the pbserved phenomena. that is why it is believed so widely.
The emails and documents from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit show that all of these environmental scientists that are pushing the belief of man made global warming were heavy in to data: omission, distortion, and manipulation. In a phrase, junk science. The documents released exposes them not as cool rational scientists, but hucksters and fanatical believers in a religion of man made global warming.
@cupera1 wow. you are obviously very unaware of what has transpired in the years since then. 5 independent investigations found that everything dealing with climategate were false. There are also more datasets than that of UEA and all show that 9 of the warmest years recorded to date occurred in the last decade. Keep up.
This has been flagged as spam show
Quality LED lightbulbs (UK Only):
It Should Not Cost The Earth To Save The Planet. Go To www_lightevolution.co.uk
SMDLightEvolution 6 days ago
Global warming was always nuclear lies
JonThm 2 weeks ago
The globe has been cooling for fourteen years
JonThm 2 weeks ago
Natural global warming ended for teen years ago!
JonThm 3 weeks ago
The fossil fuels and formed from life which died with the dinosaurs. The sea levels were 60 metres lower than today.
JonThm 3 weeks ago
The world has been cooling naturally since 1998
JonThm 1 month ago
The world has been cooling naturally for 13 years. Explain
JonThm 1 month ago
awesome, nice drawing
Caffineguy152 2 months ago
Sheffield University are doing experiments on a steam plasma doing nuclear fusion. Power with no carbon dioxide or plutonium. The latter is toxic to all life on earth. The former supports it.
JonThm 3 months ago
0:20 - 0:26 twitter's bird
myrazel2 3 months ago
why is there a nuclear plant in your animation? Nuclear plants do contribute almost nothing to AGW. other than that, a very nice animation :)
Aanthanur 3 months ago
HAIKU
I hatch! Crawl! And swim!
Oh how I love my sweet life,
But—why’s the sea warm?
—A Green Sea Turtle
StephanieLisaTara 4 months ago
More Al Gore Crap! Go ahead pay him to save you, he enjoys making everything your fault! HA-ha....
whereareyou222 4 months ago
@whereareyou222 so you know AGW only from gore's movie? and never actually took a look at scientific publications where Al plays absolutely no role? whenever one of you deniers spout this nonsense you are merely demonstrating your ignorange and the fact that you get your knowledge from TV....
Aanthanur 3 months ago
Crock o crap.
kyle92223 5 months ago
umh, kill the jews!!!
officialMC 5 months ago
@officialMC Elaborate for me please..
R0B0stairs 4 months ago
Nice animation.
bvssvni 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1.Weather is far to complex, thus impossible for us to make long term predictions.(even the short term predictions are often wrong)
2.Even if we are causing the global warming, why spend millions to prevent it? we could spend those money to be prepared for it because we now change will come even if we do nothing wrong - it seems more reasonable to me.
3.If it will happen, i can`t agree with IPCC on the consequences. they are simply beyond logic and come in contradiction with nr.1
andreiuta171 6 months ago
at 0:32 the nuclear power plant is actully exausting steam not c02.
Sumokurt1 7 months ago
Nuclear power plants (pictured in the video) have cooling towers that emit water vapor, but not CO2
catalina31768 8 months ago
DUMB ASSES think 10 billion tons of CO2 a year (3,400,00 18 wheel loads a day)
will result in - NOTHING!
The wonders of majic!
PacificCircle1 9 months ago
@PacificCircle1 x number of tons has been part of the con for a while
bottom line - co2 makes up 1/3 of a single percent of the atmosphere - its nothing, and despite a 150 yrs of use of carbon fuels,the change in co2 has been nada - ZERO
speaking of dumbasses, I wonder what plants use to make oxygen?
derrrr
wkwickham14 8 months ago
@wkwickham14 So it vanishes into nether world. I don't see trees floating at 20,000 feet. save you false logic
PacificCircle1 8 months ago
@wkwickham14 erm thats wrong, the CO² concentration has been increased by about 35% since the industrialisation. and yes it is only a small part of the athmosphere. that doesnt mean it has no influence. the influence it has is enormous.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
Climate follows the sun(.)
NOT the other way around.
ThisIsRogueLiberty 10 months ago
@ThisIsRogueLiberty the sun activity has very stable cycles. and nontheless is the global average temp rising. because the sun is not the only thing to consider.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur ...other things to consider. Such as icecaps on Mars melting?
ThisIsRogueLiberty 3 months ago
Please have a look at the Youtube Video of Save Planet Earth. The song is being established as an Anthem for all Green Supporters and hopefully everyone that will be attending Earth Day Events
Tokyorosebiz 10 months ago
0:31 nuclear factory doesn't make any pollution... that why many countries have campaigns for nuclear factories
nutabambi 10 months ago
@nutabambi what about what happened at fukushima? isn't that pollution and caused by a nuclear factory?
viagemixtlan 9 months ago
@nutabambi nuclear plants are atm the best thing we have, and in regard to AGW surely the best solution as it releases almost no CO², but to claim it doesnt make any polution is wrong.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
America STILL endorses death penalty.
America STILL has anti-abortion movement.
America STILL has church-state separation issues.
America STILL prohibits same-sex marriage.
America STILL believes evolution is a devil lie.
America STILL doesn't have universal healthcare.
America STILL thinks global warming is a conspiracy perpetrated by the rest of the world to ... well, who knows why.
Why is America always late at everything?
JennyFarlopez 11 months ago
@JennyFarlopez were not late just far ahead
archangel1845 11 months ago
Comment removed
JennyFarlopez 11 months ago
Who took away my global warming? I love you global warming! Come back!
tothatextent 11 months ago
@tothatextent
I'd like to find whoever took away global warming and invite them to help me chip away at the small glacier building up on my driveway and the small mountain of snow beside it too.
ElProximo 11 months ago
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
Fashionificationful 1 year ago
2/2 Obama's Former Green Jobs Czar and Communist, Van Jones
Admits Left is 'PRETENDING' Need for Regulations in Green Movement
watch?v=bgKr480RYc4
Fashionificationful 1 year ago
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
.
Allen West 2012
Fashionificationful 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1970, when environmentalists were making predictions of man made global cooling and the threat of an ice age, what kind of government policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?
When Ehrlich predicted that England would not exist in the year 2000, what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent such a dire outcome?
Finally, what makes us think that environmental alarmism is any more correct today than yesterday?
n5ifi 1 year ago
This is a case of, “Do as I say, not as I do.” Al, and the other elitist in this film, will continue to live in their four mansions and fly on private jets and run up electric bills 20X of the rest of us. They have no intension of stopping their life styles to “save the planet”. Of course these people that want to kill off billions of humans to have the planet eco friendly, will not include themselves on that list. The rest of us, “the great unwashed”, to the elitists, will have to live in caves
cupera1 1 year ago
Global Warming is a hoax. I'm sure that residents of Indiana will agree right now. This world has been brainwashed. I live in South Carolina and it has been very cold here. The coldest that I ever remember in my 48 years of this earth. Thanks, Clinton, Bush, Gore, and Obama for brainwashing the world.
mkl62 1 year ago
@mkl62
You're an idiot who doesn't even understand what the word "global" in "global warming" means.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 1 year ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi Unlike the 4 that I named, I've got something to say: Richard Nixon was the most honest president that the US ever had. He was a man of integrity. He never would have lied like the other four have. May Nixon rest in peace in Heaven and may the afore-mentioned four go to another place when their day comes.
mkl62 1 year ago
@mkl62
I fail to see any relevance in that comment.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 1 year ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi Bottom line: the dishonest 4 lied. Nixon never did lie. He was #1.
mkl62 1 year ago
@mkl62
I really don't care about what politicians say on this matter. I find that to be quite irrelevant to whether or not global warming is happening and is mad made.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 1 year ago
@mkl62 so the weather in xour state is representative for the world climate?
Aanthanur 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can people please look up shockingenvirom on twitter its for school work
lokijay 1 year ago
Man caused global warming is a scam.
feelzthelove 1 year ago
global warming has been cyclic all along. The world cools for 10 years then gets warmer for 10 years. Think of it as seasons(if you have cold winters and warm summers).
XKopaka85X 1 year ago
The largest killer on the planet is Liberalism.
pinewood189 1 year ago
It's a shame people have to exaggerate the facts to support their position, such as in this video. Thanks to people like you the reputation of climate science is dented by this constant exaggeration by extremist environmentalists who don't have a clue about science and just like the idea of being self-righteous hippies that know better than everyone else. Otherwise known as the 'green movement'.
Ricky103 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 I have a few questions most people never get to answering because the answers contratict popular belief. Maybe you can help?
1) Is the world is getting warmer?
2) What causes it?
3) Is it cyclical or linear?
4) Can we do something about it?
5) Should we do anything about it? Is it a bad thing?
6) What should be done? I think we only answered the first question, then skipped down number 5. Shouldn't we agree scientifically on the other questions first?
bsabruzzo 1 year ago
@bsabruzzo
1) yes
2) CO²
3) exponential
4) reduce CO² emmissions
5)yes we have to do something
6) see answer 4
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Love the answere's. So simple... your thoughts, not the answers.
the right answers are:
1) Yes and no.
2) CO2, Sulfur, Water vapor, Methane, Position in the solar system, solar flares, gamma rays, unknown
3) Cyclical and linear, ggoing up AND down
4) Most likely not, it depends on the cause (see #2)
5) More deaths are caused by hunger from cold climates and from hypothermia than by an abundance of food and land and vegitation
6) See my #6 and stop skipping the science.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo you are wrong
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "you are wrong" Gratuitous comment, equal answer: No, I'm not.
However, I will respect you and ask, wrong about which part? After all, I just summed up the entire debate in a short space, using the scientists' research and the reports that aren't political. With NASA returning temperatures and photos showing temps decreasing as CO2 increasing, as data shows warm weather has fewer deaths than cold, and the ICC admitting to cooking the results... hard not to agree we know little.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo source for the alleged data showing decreasing temps as CO² is rising?
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur CO2 rising: ICC, NOAH
Temperatures falling: NOAH, NASA
NASA also shows satalite images of increase in ice in Antarctica
ICC also states that they used "fudged" figures and tossed out realevant data showing temperature decline
Now, you can conserve all you'd like. I'm not stopping you. in fact, as a libertarian, I encourage you to do what you want to as long as you don't harm others or take away their liberties.
And I will do the same.
SAVE THE PRISSLY BEAR!
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo links pls. because what you say is not true at all. you are a conspiracy lunatic thats it.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "because what you say is not true at all" I'm sending a link. But, you should also show your. It's only fair.
Head to The Blaze website and follow the links in the many articles. You can start here:
/stories/guess-what-humans-actually-helped-curb-methane-gas-increases/
Or here:
/stories/new-study-of-nasa-data-may-debunk-global-warming-predictions/
Or here:
/stories/nobel-prize-winner-resigns-over-an-incontrovertible-stance-on-global-warming/
And then dig deeper for the data.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "you are a conspiracy lunatic thats it" I also think you should look up "conspiracy". You'll find that I am quite the opposite, as I don't think there is a conspiracy. Just faulty data and people. See it isn't about conspiracies or "saving the planet" (The Earth will survive if humans kill off all humans). It's about natural rights. Your rights stop when they impeed upon my or other people's rights. So, talk and show data all you wish, but don't force people to your will at gunpoint.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo you mean your right stops where it endangers my life? like when your huge CO² release will actually harm others?
and you know, since decades scientists publish their data and studies in peer reviewed journals, and they didn't see the faulty data.... but you, some random guy on YT, you have spotted it, and instead of publishing your findings in a peer reviewed journal, you moan about it on youtube..... lol
AGW is real, if you like it or not. and we have to reduce our CO² emmissions.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "you mean your right stops where it endangers my life? like when your huge CO² release will actually harm others" Correct... but GW increases crop yeild and rainfall and habitable land. It reduces cold winters and deaths from hunger and hypothermia.
CO2 isn't the only cause of GW, and humans only produce a small fraction of CO2, and the actually estimates from the officials at ICC is 0.01 degree over 100 years. Not really a threat.
But you do as you wish, just don't harm me.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo yes really a threat.....
the negative impact are alot bigger than the possitve ones. We are the main cause. and regarding CO² we are the worst producers. nature has cycles, while we almost exclusively add CO² and dont take away from the equotation. And i dont plan to harm you, just to reduce the harm you do to the climate.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "the negative impact are alot bigger than the possitve ones" Very much still debated and debatable: see my original post.
"We are the main cause... almost exclusively add" Not in reality. CO2 is a common part of the Earth cycle and isn't created out of nothing by humans. We use what already exists. The oil, methane and plants all exist and would release that carbon. The net is actually a loss of CO2 into space (see NASA). And all animal life produces CO2 via resperation.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo in nature there are CO² cycles, CO² is added to the atmospere but also removed from the athmosphere. we do not remove much, we almost exclusively add CO². Yes nature adds alot more CO², like Oceans or forests, but they also take away much more and actually take away more than they add. we do the contrary. we add much much more than we take away.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Your correct,there's a consensus among Gov. scientists/Professors whose funding comes from the UN or congress. There is no political divide about gravity is there!
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy yeah more conspiracy nonsense lol
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "add CO² and dont take away from the equotation" There have been very successful tests of CO2 "scrubbers" that take the naturally formed compound called carbon dioxide and turn it into oxygen and carbon "slag". When these have been brought to the environmentalists, they were all dismissed because it really isn't about CO2. GW is still an unknown and understudied problem we are trying to solve by "harming' others rather than seeking real causes and, if needed, solutions.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "i dont plan to harm you, just to reduce the harm you do to the climate" Let's examine:
1) The climate is a closed system that reacts to all factors, thus we are a part and cant "harm" it by reintroducing an element back into it from itself
2) We don't know what is the cause or the true effect of GW (see original post)
3) By restraining another person's liberties, without evidence of harm, you are harming that individual, including financially or actiaon.
Save the Prizzly Bear!
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo there is plenty of evidence of harm. for example in Tuvalu. they are giving up their island and new zealand agreed to take all citizens from there. So we have already harmed people.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "there is plenty of evidence of harm" Not of a human causing harm, which is all a human can control (this isn't a comic book).
"Tuvalu. they are giving up their island" for many reasons. The evidence is due to rising sea levels, errosion, over population and, as is the case in the Pasific Basin, the sumergence of the ocean floor. man doesn't control any of those things.
In fact, GW is shown to stabilize the weather patterns, not create Ninos and Ninas, the greif of Tuvalu.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo not at all, and there are not many reasons, AGW is the only reason.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aanthanur "there are not many reasons, AGW is the only reason" So GW (what is the "A"?) is causing the tetonic plates of the planet to shift? That's a new one. I'll have to read up on that. And read more on how GW creates more people via birth rates. Hmmm...
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "decades scientists publish their data and studies in peer reviewed journals" Peer review was exposed by scientists in the ICC (the "global warming" guys people always quote) as manipulated to exclude those who don't agree with GW. The same peer reviewed journals concluded global cooling and an ice age was coming. NASA (who measures global temps) and ICC scientists admit to their faulty data and conclusions.
But "you, some random guy on YT" know they are all wrong and you are correct
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo source for "NASA (who measures global temps) and ICC scientists admit to their faulty data and conclusions." ?
they don't. Nobody showed them to be wrong at all. and show me a scientific publication that was peer reviewed in a respected journal that claims global cooling and ice age coming. Newspapers are not peer reviewed journals.........
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "Nobody showed them to be wrong at all" The GW hystaria from "An inconvienient Truth" is based on the "hockey stick" graph, created from ice core samples for CO2 and tree rings for temperature. This data doesn't match to modern temperature readings from NASA, according to both men who did the study.
As for the conclusions, follow the links to NASA on the Blaze web site...
/stories/new-study-of-nasa-data-may-debunk-global-warming-predictions/
Remote Sensing is peer reviewed
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo LOL Mann actually never admitted anything of the sort, quite the contrary, several other studies confirmed it, and Mann himself had a paper in 2008 i think that was more detailed and confirmed again that the hockey stick is correct.
But it really doesn't matter what Al claimed in his movie. He is no scientist and has not one single published peer reviewed article on the topic. i dont talk about Al, i talk about scientists.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "i dont talk about Al, i talk about scientists" You talk about 30% of scientists who agree with you. You don't talk about those who have offered alternative causes, who have demanded to have their names removed from the studies, or who never were scientists, but are counted on the "official" report, the basis for the legislation and hysteria.
A.Gore is mentioned because he is a symptom (or effect) of the debate, not the basis for it.
I never denied GW, just pointed out the skipped
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo lol 30%? where do you get that from? there is only a hand full of scientists in the field of climatology that deny AGW, the vast majority is in agreement of AGW. since the 70's the vast majority of published stidues support AGW theory. and almost no credible paper denies it.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur You have to explain the "A" please.... as GW is a natural responce to natural processes. As the past decade has shown global temperatures to be stable of falling slightly, as sunspot activity matches up with increases in global temps and CO2 lags, as NASA's studies (in a peer reviewed journal) shows that Earth is releasing heat at a greater rate when the level of CO2 increases, as the actual measured temperatures don't always match ice CO2 and tree rings, I say study must continue.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo sun activity nonsense i see..... debunked. the sun activity has relative stable cycles, temperatures not. you just are grasping at straws here.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "debunked. the sun activity has relative stable cycles, temperatures not" Umm, yes, CLIMATE has decades and even centuries of stability. TEMPERATURE the way you are reffering to it changes by the minute.
Anyway, sunspot activity has been shown to have a closer corellation to global climatic trends. Not grasping here. Just pointing out an equally viable theory. in fact, the decreas in sunspot activity matches the past decade of level global tempuratures.
CO2 doesn't.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo no it is not an equal viable theory, its not even a proper hypothesis anymore as it was shown to be wrong.
and no global average temperature doesnt change by the minute, its actually a moving 10 year average, and it is rising.
AGW theory shows that CO² is the main problem, not sunspots. that was shown to be wrong several times now.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur "[solar warming] was shown to be wrong" It's interesting that the very same paper and debate that proves that solar activity isn't a cause for GW also included evidence that CO2 isn't suficient to cause the warming either. So your own defence provided a counter to your main assertion. (sketicalscience's website, biocab's site) And you either accept NASA's and NOAH's conclusions or don't. Don't cherry-pick them.
But my point it not the sun did it, but that there are other causes left.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo what paper specifically do you believe to prove that CO² isn't enough to be blamed for the warming?
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Let's see who has the open mind in this discussion:
Person A (me): sees errors, poor data and other opinions (interpretations of the data), goes to other sources when is challenges, then shares his doubts.
Person B (you); Says' it's AGW. only AGW. Asks a question that is answered by reading the links I pointed to. Still asks "what paper specifically " and demands peer reviewed studies, even when one is offered.
The debate goes on, this disscussion ends.
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo you said "the very same paper and debate that proves that solar activity isn't a cause for GW also included evidence that CO2 isn't suficient to cause the warming either."
I wondered which paper you are exactly referning to. why dont you just give me the title of the paper you have in mind?
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur do your own research, there are hundreds of "scientific papers" and videos on Youtube, your either ignorant,lazy ,or can't use Google.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy you talked about one specific paper. i asked you wich one you mean.... as you refuse to name it, i must assume you just made it up.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur You know what ? I've played this game before with your kind,, I list one or ten papers and you shoot them down ,google it yourself , every reference I give you you'll have a prob with no matter the persons qualifications.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy lol
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Now, if you are saying that the science is definative and it can't change, I offer two more absolutes of science that can never change... and yet were proven wrong:
1) Gravity is objects pulling each other, where the largest object wins... wrong, it is a dip in space/time and things are falling into the distortion... um, wait, it's changinf again.
2) Nothing can go faster than the speed of light... wronge, light can go faster than itself if... wait, other particles can go faster...
bsabruzzo 3 months ago
@bsabruzzo i never claimed science is definitive and can never change, its science, not religion. so it can change, when evidence is presented. but that isn0t the case atm for the AGW theory.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur once again your right ,there are no credible sources you'll listen to or give credit,I could list 100.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@Aanthanur LIST OF CONSPIRACIES.....Yellowcake forgery,Iraq and weapons of mass destruction,Iran-Contra Affair,Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male,October surprise,Watergate ,CIA Operation Northwoods,CIA Operation Merlin this is a PARTIAL LIST of proven conspiracies did I mention JFK?
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy but when we talk about AGW, we talk about a world wide conspiracy of thaudends of scientists and hundrets of very famous scientific institutes around the world. that would be alot bigger than all the conspiracies you listed. and your listed conspiracies were alot smaller and were not able to be kept secret. so try again with your conspiracy nuttery.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Ok buddy this is is how these debates usually go, your side knows everything and everyone else is dumb and ignorant ,just be aware of this ,when you come on my property to seize whatever it is you claim is changing the world ( My cattle,Hay,Truck ,Thermostat,black roof vs white,) I'm going to have a present for you! it's the ultimate argument ! it trumps Al Gores whining AND yours! if you want to come over now I'll give it to you early! Have a nice life!
davetileguy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@davetileguy lol are you threatening me? how cute.
was to be expected....
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Expodential? like Earth will be the temperature of the sun? or hotter? there are no cycles or curves things just increase ? Droughts never end? hurricanes just get stronger and engulf the whole world? "do something" like stop volcano's from erupting and tundra from melting and releasing Co2? it is what it is deal with it.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy sure there are cycles that is why we use long term averages, to smooth out such ups and downs.
and volcanos release alot less CO² than humans do. and we cant controll it, but human release can be controlled.... you fail.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
get real...... GLOBAL WARMING IS FAKE!
wtfisthis1990 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
global warming is fake and gay
wtfisthis1990 1 year ago
To throw a new angle on this issue (to get off the same tired track): how many of you GW deniers believe the gov't story re: 911 vs alternate theories (no planes, missiles, holograms). I really have no strong feelings either way on who caused 911, because it makes no practical difference what one believes about it, unlike GW, which we can do something about.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 I side slightly with the official gov't story. However, the who-caused-911 issue is the ONE issue where I DO feel sympathy for the opposing side. Where I do feel that those who believe 911-is-an-inside-job theory ARE oppressed more than "my" (or, rather, the gov't's) side.
Not so for GW. At all. There, the suppression of truth is done ENTIRELY by the GW-deniers OF those who know GW is real & serious.
deskset24 1 year ago
The animation is attractive and has been well-executed. It surely expresses a serious concern.
HorizSvcs 1 year ago
US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life'
Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California,
Dayversion 1 year ago
Scientists threatened for 'climate denial'
Tom Harper
Scientists who questioned mankind's impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.
They say the debate on global warming has been "hijacked" by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon Trading, Carbon Taxes, government (taxpayer) subsidies
Dayversion 1 year ago
@Dayversion And scientist who have accepted global warming receive death threats. They say the debate has been hijacked by a powerful alliance of politicians, a small number of scientists, and wealthy industrialists and corporations who make stuff up about the effects of CO2 emissions and their effects.
The difference is the 98% of climate scientists who agree with the IPCC can actually provide scientific back up for their position
Ignore the rest. Listen to the science. Global Warming is real
rugbyguy59 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Leading US Physicist Labels Satellitegate Scandal a Catastrophe
In a fresh week of revelations when NOAA calls in their lawyers to handle the fallout, Dr Charles R. Anderson adds further fuel to the fire and fumes against NOAA, 1 of the 4 agencies charged with responsibility for collecting global climate temperatures NOAA is now fighting a rearguard legal defense to hold onto some semblance of credibility with growing evidence of systemic global warming data flaws by government climatologists
Dayversion 1 year ago
stellar
Nnomulac 1 year ago
Get educated: anthropogenic global warming has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH AL GORE! It has been known for 100 years!
All the GW-deniers need to be forcibly castrated to prevent their inferior genes from reproducing and then be forced to live in Los Angeles forever on a day like today when it hit 113 deg F.
deskset24 1 year ago
wow all the land flooding in two seconds! five C points
dawidpawelec08 1 year ago
To the politically correct fuckheads: James Ray - isn't that the shithead who believed in "The Secret" bullshit and killed 3 people in a sweatlodge? If you mean that guy in the Discovery Channel, he was some rabid anti-immigrant protestor who hated illegal Mexican immigrants. But, at least he fought and died to end human overpopulation. I am not going to be silenced by politically correct assholes: James Lee whatever was a hero fighting for a noble cause, like any soldier.
deskset24 1 year ago
may i ask a question where did you get the audio you use for it??
mhall0wsxz31 1 year ago
CO2 increases in a cold period
JonThm 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GW is nuclear FICTION - says Harvard University.
JonThm 1 year ago
ITS a matter of concern!!! YES I AM WITH YOU!!!!
crazynick2122 1 year ago
Comment removed
Terb65 1 year ago
@crazynick2122
Global Warming: There are people who want to steal big money. They want to build expensive windmill which fight GW. Of course they take your money by a TAXES.
Is the GW caused by a man?
Let's THINHK and learn about:
en.wikipedia: key: Axial_tilt
precession ane ice ages....
Terb65 1 year ago
@Terb65 doh, axial tilt is considerend in the AGW theory.....
Aanthanur 3 months ago
stopglobalwarming - James Jay Lee?? You fucking asshole.
KingDingaLing090 1 year ago
PLANT TREES
RECYCLE
SAVE ENERGY AND WATER
lets do something.
TheCBNtv 1 year ago 5
WE GOTTA DO SOMETHING BEFORE ITS TOO LATE
TheCBNtv 1 year ago 8
@TheCBNtv hey check my vids i have one how to help earth thanks :)
randomsuitelife1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No GW
JonThm 1 year ago
Impacts of climate change in the news...
.
Greenland's giant island of ice could pose threat to offshore platforms, shipping
.
It's been a summer of near Biblical climatic havoc across the planet, with wildfires raging in Russia and floods claiming lives across Asia. But the moment the Petermann glacier cracked — giving birth to the biggest Arctic ice island in half-century — may symbolize a warming world like no other.
.
Associated Press
11 August 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Global warming is a hoax. Get educated, stop listening to government sponsored gold diggers. The earth is cooling, get ready for the big freeze coming this winter. Last winter was a holiday. Buy up snowplows. Buy up snowblowers. Don't be caught defenseless. It's going to be brutal
You will never see 350 ppm CO2 again in this century and that doesn't matter anyhow. Wake the fuck up you simpletons. The books are cooked and so is your goose. The world is cooling. Get off your computer dummy.
patioperson 1 year ago
answer to global warming: reduce population size - less demand of resorces.. ffs
x10secsx 1 year ago
isn't by using this much paper contributing to global warming?
doco5622 1 year ago
good job done
adpsykid 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You do know nuclear power plants produce next to 0 CO2 emissions. Those big towers you see releasing stuff are releasing water vapor. It was also interesting to see how you think the entire world will flood from global warming. This I'm sorry to say is impossible, there isn't enough water. You also assume man is causing the global temperature to rise which is easily shown to be wrong.
thebestsumoeva 1 year ago
Very good animation!
duck24x 1 year ago
CORRUPT gives less jobs then they will create more buldings to solve the problem then they will forget about earth and start hinking about money and fortune AND THEY WILl DIE FASTER .MONEY is just paper! with some stuff! think about 2060 and your dead and you have children you will just let them die alone themselves!! if ur gonna do that ur selfish and MONEY WILL NOT GO TO HELL OR HEAVEN! stop global warming so u will be a savior and god will be proud of you!!
ThePaulgonzales18 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThePaulgonzales18 In 60 years we will all laugh at you when it is obvious that global warming was just a hoax.
thebestsumoeva 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
global warming is NOT a fraud, dumbasses!
whoever thinks so have been BRAINWASHED by the fossil fuel industry and fatass SHOCK JOCKS....
SCIENCE is on al gore's side, global warming is REAL and MOSTLY MAN-MADE
wake the fuck up,OIL SHEEP
stopglobalwarming08 1 year ago 25
@stopglobalwarming08
whoever thinks so HAS been BRAINWASHED
stopglobalwarming08 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stopglobalwarming08 Sadly you've been brainwashed by one of the biggest morons in history, Al Gore. Prove to me how CO2 a gas which is essential for life is somehow destroying the planet? Tell me why every single computer model we've made and put to the test has been wrong? Tell me oh please just tell me why people like you keep spreading around this garbage like it's the bible and we are on the holy crusades.
thebestsumoeva 1 year ago
How come in the last 15 years, human production of CO2 dubbled yet the tempurture hasn't gone up?
That is credible evidence!
simontimon2 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 Typical. Read more. Al Gore is nothing but a wolf in a sheep's skin, and you my friend are the sheep. I don't dispute the fact that the earth can get warmer than it currently is. I dispute the fact that it's because of humans. CO2 is not a pollutant and you're a fool if you think it is.
woodsy0003 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 Hey where you in the Discovery,channel building today? Jake Lee?? Dude what the hell. Take your delusions out on your self. Dont kill anyone and explode a pipe bomb because of Al Gore stupid propaganda. "Ishmael" is just a story. Take your pipe bomb DOWN.
PUT THE GUN DOWN...
KingDingaLing090 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 you don't know what your talking about....im a geologist, 65 million years ago carbon level where 12 times higher and its thought global temps where the same or a maximum of 3 degrees higher and there might have been more abundant life than there is now....i.e this is when the dinosaur lived and all the oil we use was formed because there was so many living organisms...doomsday my ass
0pocketpenis0 1 year ago
@0pocketpenis0
you posted:
"you don't know what your talking about....im a geologist"
uh huh, a "geologist" without spell check? LOL
ok mr. "geologist", do u have any peer-reviewed scientific research to discredit man-made global warming?
stopglobalwarming08 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 Keep fighting the great fight!
As long as these deniers keep up with their "I'm a ____, so GW is a fraud" crap, then they have no business complaining if I turn the tables on them and say,
"I'm a mathematician, so if you use numbers anywhere in your work, then my professional opinion trumps your opinion in (whatever area of expertise: law, military, medicine)."
deskset24 1 year ago
@0pocketpenis0
mr. "geologist", where do u work?
stopglobalwarming08 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 global warming is fake and gay
wtfisthis1990 1 year ago
Comment removed
feelzthelove 1 year ago
@feelzthelove Global warming is not a fraud, but it's not man-made.
Man is a part of global warming but only a TINY bit.
It's not the first time this planet has global warming or the last.
Sokan1993 1 year ago
Comment removed
feelzthelove 1 year ago
Comment removed
feelzthelove 1 year ago
@feelzthelove global warming is man caused, there i convinced you. Idiot
ocallaghan1916 1 year ago
@stopglobalwarming08 Scientific facts are to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome.Man made G.W. is a theory.
davetileguy 1 year ago
@davetileguy indeed a theory. a scientific theory, not just some hypthesis, its a theory. a theory is the highest one can get in science. a theory is able to explain all the observed phenomena. and AGW theory is able to do that.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur A theory is higher than a fact? interesting. I guess MM GW is a religion then.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy a theory explains several facts. the facts are the temperature measurments for example. a fact is a observed phenomena. the theory is to explain those.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Whatever, does name calling make you feel bigger ? LOL theory's explain facts??Scientific facts are generally believed to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome
.Reverse Scientific Method:
1)Draw your conclusion.
2)Select data,no matter how flawed,to support you conclusion.
3)Discard any data,no matter how valid,which does not.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy Scientific facts are generally believed to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome
there is a scientific concencus on AGW theory as strong as the concencus on the theory of evolution. only a small fringe group is in denial.
allmost all observers agree on it.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur We're here , the temperature is rising , therefor it's our fault? I think they call that circumstantial evidence. good thing your not a lawyer!
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy no not because we are here, because we are releasing huge amounts of CO² by burning fossil fuels. we add additional CO² tot the natural cycle and this way bring the CO² concentrations out of balance, and this additional CO² is reradiating alot of heat. you should maybe read some scientific publications on this matter instead of making stuff up.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur Sigh.. here we go again,what have I made up? these are the arguments as your side has presented them. You have no idea what I've read ,how bizarre to make such a statement about someone you don't know.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy now you are downright lying.
my side does not in anyway claim "We're here , the temperature is rising , therefor it's our fault"
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur SO we're not here and CO2 increase is'nt our fault? please explain.
Our opinions may differ but I do not lie ,I don't have to the truth is much easier and allways perserviers.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy oh dear, then you are just stupid. you said"We're here , the temperature is rising , therefor it's our fault?" i explained no not because we are here, because of our CO² emmissions. and then you claimed my side would claim because we are here and temps are rising therefor its our fault.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@Aanthanur I had it drilled into my head in 9th Grade biology. I think maybe the reason the college age kids (and younger) have all bought into global warming is that they were never taught anything about the scientific method and the difference between a theory, a proof, and a belief, and their teachers don't know anything about it, either.
davetileguy 3 months ago
@davetileguy AGW is a full blown theory. and there is no body in sight presenting a alternative theory explaining all the pbserved phenomena. that is why it is believed so widely.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@stopglobalwarming08
The emails and documents from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit show that all of these environmental scientists that are pushing the belief of man made global warming were heavy in to data: omission, distortion, and manipulation. In a phrase, junk science. The documents released exposes them not as cool rational scientists, but hucksters and fanatical believers in a religion of man made global warming.
cupera1 1 year ago
@cupera1 wow. you are obviously very unaware of what has transpired in the years since then. 5 independent investigations found that everything dealing with climategate were false. There are also more datasets than that of UEA and all show that 9 of the warmest years recorded to date occurred in the last decade. Keep up.
WaxItYourself 11 months ago
@cupera1 no, independent investigations around the world have actually shown that there was no wrongdoing.
Aanthanur 3 months ago
@stopglobalwarming08 The oil industry supports the global warming theory. They are even members of the Chicago Climate Exchange.
AverageJoeNewsBlogg