Added: 2 years ago
From: citizentube
Views: 52,111
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (365)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • she elegant. 

  • sexy accent voice <3

  • Tom! How does cap and trade/carbon tax get the cost of energy DOWN?? His actions are going to make the lives of poor people WORSE. This is an economist? Lomborg is the man. They should have just let him talk the whole time. Watch "Cool It" so you don't look like Daryl Hannah. (OK, I should've said, TALK, like Daryl Hannah)

  • CNN = Crappy Nonsense News

  • This is a con job. The members of finance want to scam hardworking people

  • New World Order is around the corner... wake up sheep. I love CO2.

  • TO ALL THOSE WHO ENJOYED THE POEM AT THE BEGINNING, PLEASE CHECK MY CHANNEL FOR MORE VIDEOS & PROTEST POETRY.

    Time to take the power back.

    PEACE,

    Martin Powell.

  • THIS DEBATE IS WAY OFF THE REAL SCIENCE. THIS ISN'T A DEBATE. IT'S A JOKE. DARYL HANNAH?!?! WTF.

  • NOTICE THEY DON'T SIMPLY MAKE LAW AGAINST CO2. THEY MAKE A TAX AND HUGE MONEY MAKING CAP AND TRADE, AND DERIVATIVE PROFIT SCHEMES FOR BANKS AND INVESTORS. CORPORATIONS WILL GET RICH AS HELL !!!!

  • I just had to leave a comment, great video!

  • the sun creates climate, we only polute..

    .

  • the first guy should make the speech into a song

  • @kyosho94 lol i was a poem didnt know that first xD

  • Comment removed

  • I'm very pro-environmental friendly products etc. but this was mostly just a waste of time...

    they could have given tips on what to do as citizens, statistics, compared efficiency of planes vs auto vehicles for travelling etc.

    its undeniable that chemicals harm natural things, to put it very simple...if the human body can get poisoned, so can the planet. It's beyond idiotic to think that humans have not harmed the planet with advancement of technology.

  • Deny Deny Deny! Keep defending the corporations bottom line. The evidence is clear, and if you deny it, you haven't seen the evidence. I bet these people refute Evolution too.

  • I know let's all put corks in our rectums to prevent us from farting methane into the air. Of course we will get huge stomaches but who cares, right?

  • good fight planet earth, it was a good ride.

    Short but good.

    this video barely gets 50,000 views, meanwhile fucking ke$ha tik tok gets like 7 billion views.

    Amazing.

  • See what is the plan for this earth at "Fall of the republic" here on youtube. You will see the plan and how you will lose your freedom and rights as a human. OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES AND SEE THE LIE THAY ARE TELLING YOU. THEY THINK YOU ARE DUMB AND KNOW YOUR ARE GOING TO GO WITH WHAT THEY SAY BECAUSE THEY SAY IT SO MUCH. IF SOMETHING IS REPEATED ENOUGH YOU WILL BELEAVE IT IT AND THEY KNOW IT. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • We need to take back our world back from these super powers that just wont to take our money by making up lies like climet change. We need to give these 50,000 scientists ( who have proved with out a dout that humans are not the problem but that the earth is going through a normall worming cycle ) a voice. Let all the people in the world now about the "LIE" of human made climat change. CLIMET CHANGE IS A LIE AND THAT IS A FACT!!!!! Learn about this lie and the plans they have for us.

  • It is a fact that humans are not the cause of climate change, it is our sun and earth is in a worming cycle. The people of this planet need to see the real truth of what is going on here. With this lie goverments can take away all our freedoms and tax us for thing that they would have never been able to tax us for. They can also start wars with who ever they wont, all they need to say is you are not doing what we say so you are now braking these laws so now we can kill your people.

  • ps.. who gives a fuck what some washed up actress thinks. shut up daryl

  • i like how the "resident skeptic," is just skeptical of the new government policies. so anyone who has a legitimate question is going against 5 people with opposite opinions (i count the "moderator" since that bitch is obviously biased.) what shit.. oh well

  • fuck off globAL Warming people. there is no climate crisis. tHE CLIMATE CHANGES EVERY MORNING AND NIGHT. THIS IS JUST SO GOLDMAN SACHS CAN PROFIT.

  • iam using a device that turn water in hydroge , is a ultimate genration that turn any fuel vehice with zero co2 releasing even using traditional fuel any actually . at same tima i feel mor power , the engine is more smothly in power and silent , thte oil changes are now even more rare ..please chek hidrogeneozero on google they are offering from free 6 book all about water for hydrogen devices all , no need to buy , unbelieveble . God bless HHO

  • As someone who studies climate....... that was a worthless "debate". Was there no poverty before 1950? Was climate not changing before then? Did not we have a Dust bowl in the U.S. during a time when anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions became significant? Is the climate system so sensitive to a 100ppm increase in atmospheric composition? The assumption during this entire "debate" was that if we do nothing there will be catastrophe. ..... debate centered around international welfare.

  • ugh cnn on youtube already. -.- this is gonne be boring as fuck

  • Stop Farting!

  • preaty wonderful movie, worthy for the watch! Seen the Movie found at

    watch BBB last BBB movies. com (delete BBB's)

  • notice what this is really about. distributing wealth from developed countries to developing countries

  • @tonylee1973 Or... you know, just a scientific problem that requires co-ordinated international action and not conspiracy theories to be solved.

  • Climate is changing, no doubt, but Im not paying one dime for it, it is not humans doing it...These people NEVER talk about solar activity and increase in Gamma Rays from deep space and the decrease in the magnetosphere, just plain a scam.... Money money..

  • @FromDimmuLand Solar activity was talked about years ago. Solar activity has continued to go through its 11 year cycle predictably exactly as it has for 100s of years, yet the overall temperature of the Earth has continued to go up every year without any dips, predictably by the volume of CO2 added to atmosphere.

  • 40:15 :D

  • Debate? This was a one sided commercial! How can you call that a "climate debate," especially considering the panelists were on the same side of the issue? One even said it at the beginning, he said something like we can all agree climate change is real and it was brought on by us humans. So how in the heck does this constitute a debate? The media used to REPORT the news TO the public, now you guys just INFORCE the news/agenda AT the public.

    (1 of 2)

  • (cont'd 2 of 2) How is everybody just ok with this? Look I don't care for either party but I do care to learn the facts of an issue and from both sides so I can figure out fot MYSELF what I agree with, especially when the stakes are excedingly high. I just hate the fact that the news media has become so one sided and intertwined with politics that the facts verses what actually gets reported are often completely opposite.

  • youre right this seems one sided but to explain and report what is going on would take another hour or two, CNN expects many of those who see this video to have some knowledge of global warming. this debate is more about the Copenhagen Summit and if anything will get resolved. not the fact if Global warming is actually happening, that debate is pretty much over.

  • The reason why everyone on the panel agrees that GW is real and caused by humans is that even most of the real scientists, even the skeptics.

    Both Roy Spencer and John Christy say this. There is a video on YouTube where Spencer is recorded as saying to a group of conservatives: "Global warming is happening, it is being caused by human GHG emissions, and so get over it".

    They just dont think it will be catastrophic. Only the politically motivated fringe deny that GW is caused by GHGs.

  • 0:55

  • Comment removed

  • Everyone on the panel agrees with the statement," global warming is man made". Hey cnn, I thought this was a debate instead of pure propaganda .

  • Mass media are avoiding people text comments in Youtube right now unless ... you're talking for them.

  • In fact if you think, it's pretty stupid to say "Save the world". The world, Earth, will always survive it's we, we who need to save ourselves from global climate disasters, changes and all that, Earth will always survive and recover in time, it may take thousands, millions and billions of years. But it will always recover itself and new creatures will be born. In short, the Earth would be a better place without our presence.

    What do you think? Leave an answer to my comment below.

  • I feel a bit angry that one of the first things said by those on the panel is "global warming is man made". Completely brushed over all conflicting evidence. I thought this was a debate? I saw no debate. Should be cut pollution? Of course. But that doesn't make global warming a man made crisis. People need to look more closely at the sun's activity, and the changes other planets are undergoing. And what has happened to our own planet in the past.

  • This entire video is silly. Global Warming and Climate Change is a myth that only the brain dead masses are falling for. Pay more carbon taxes to get the rich even richer, that will save the world from heating up. Gimme a fucking break people. This whole thing is silly.

  • ROFL at 40:00

    little girls rappin makes Mr.T happy.

  • Watch my video. Stunning, breathtaking, strong and deep images. Thanks!

  • Middle-class families are looking for more than empty promises. They want to go back to work. And they want the Democrats who run Washington to stop pursuing a big government, big spending agenda that includes a government takeover of health care, stimulus bills, a new national energy tax and taxpayer-funded bailouts. The recent elections in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New Jersey have shown that voters aren't buying this rhetoric, and in November well see voters aren't buying it either.

  • People need to drop Thomas Friedman and pick up some Milton Friedman.

  • People like Friedman spout that global warming caused by CO2 levels are the same thing as the greenhouse effect. Two completely separate issues that have vague a relation. Your argument better safe than sorry is stupid. Heres another stupid analogy that is very similar- We can say the same thing for invisible dragons that will pass through the atmosphere. We can't see them but ohh they are coming. We must develop anti-dragon weaponry... after all better safe than sorry.

  • Thomas Friedman is spouting a bunch of bullshit.

    "That greenhouse gas up there that traps that heat, stays up there for hundreds if not thousands of years."

    Wrong, its closer to 50-75 years.

    Furthermore they don't have one real skeptic on this panel that doubts the validity that is caused by humans. It is possible that humans may affect the climate but to the degree that these alarmists say is ridiculous. Frequent changes in weather are always attributed to the global warming hysteria.

  • @hannel19 You sir is an idiot! Ofc. 2.000.000.000 poor chineses and indians, stepping up to our level will have an impact... and why in gods name won't we just change our fuel to renevable energy instead, better safe than sorry....

  • @Dracullia There is nothing wrong with renewable energy but it should be a movement made by private citizens and companies. Government subsidies to corporate America is costly and stupid. There are people who will stand to make billions on this shit including Al Gore and many others in the "green movement." Its not so much a green movement as just another way that corporate America can pass down the cost to the American people. Besides the fact that people don't understand global warming.

  • @Dracullia Besides the fact that you made no real counter argument to mine and I didn't even touch the surface of it. Shut up bitch. Let your liberal agenda wash over any sensibility you once had and go live on commune with the rest of your hippie friends. I'll be happy living off the spoils of the products of an industrialized society. Go ahead shut off your computer and live off the grid. Peace

  • Yeah, it's always sad to see that people believe evolution and global warming and other scientific bullshit, right ? ;)

  • @AinEstonia Haha your point is laughable. Evolution is true. Global Warming- completely different topic that is a little more complex. For example can you tell me how large the quantities of carbon emissions during the medieval time period are compared with today? This is a very important component to proving that emissions were insanely influenced by the industrial revolution. Even if it is true, which is possible, is it getting worse because of the US? All countries play a part.

  • Wow dumb and selfish as anyone... hippies and liberals are two completely seperate things, yes some people will earn a lot on green technology, and if it's such a huge problem for you why don't you just get a job in that workline? Plz take a look outside you'r door and look at all the cars and all the energy and all the trash you nearby surroundings are producing... then multiply that with say 1 billion,

  • and you don't think we'r interfering with the balance of energy stored in the crust of the earth, and the energy in the atmosfere... Only an rtard won't realise that pumping up energy at the rate we are that has been stored since a time where palmtrees grew on the north pole would have an effect on the climate... Liberal or not we need to change it now, and yet again better safe than sorry... i'll still be well off =)

  • i thought this was going to be a debate, not a warmist's love-in. thanks youtube. way to wuss out. the "resident skeptic" is exactly that, he's one of them. he's only skeptical of the policy not going far enough.

    it's bs, and i can't believe more people haven't seen through it by now.

    all the warmists on here can get warmed with their own farts. i've debated dozens of them on youtube pages and i'm tired of it.

    tired of the smugness, the assumptions about my politics, all of it. AGW is bunkum

  • omg. you guys are fucking idiots.

    i have had enough of all these liberals spouting misinformed crap about climate climate.

    and i have had enough of all these smartass conservatives who know jack shit.

    there are MAJOR environmental problems other than global warming. get your head outta your ass already.

  • ok nvm i waited and saw it was 3 on 1 hmmm not to mention they put an actress on the panel, what a freaking joke!

  • ok wow i stopped watching this after this guy gave his dumb poem...obv this is going to be a joke should have know since it is by CNN

  • FUCK GLOBAL WARMING

  • y is there and actress debating climate change?

  • all these liberal idots are liars.

  • this is a fucking joke of a debate....

  • Why don't we just," cut to the chase", on this one ok? This has more to do with global wealth redistribution and social engineering then anything to do with the climate. Can't you just admit that this plays a major roll, if not the entire roll, of any potential climate change agreement?

  • I do agree with you. People seem to be so full of themselves these days thinking we have the capacity to cause global warming.

    The Permain Period saw the worst disaster of global warming ever and 90% of all creatures died. Where people and CEO's around to cause it back then?

    And stop hating on CEO's lib haters. It's not their fault they went throught he trouble to get a degree in buisness, partner up with a company and work 14 hours a day for the next twenty years to get where they are at

  • What an example of scientific ignorance. First, the Permian climate change, climate changes before this one, happened slowly. This climate change, however, is happening at an alarming rate. Proof? Check out all the peer-reviewed scientific publications cited by the United Nations as evidence that the present climate change is anthropogenic. And yes, humans are capable of producing that amount of carbon dioxide. We've been spewing greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution.

  • I still have a hard time believing that 200 years of carbon emissions can cause such climate change. A thousand years, maybe. But 200?

    The only thing I do agree with is that internal combustion is a relic of the 19th century. Why we are not using electricity or hydrogen more is beyond me.

    I'm not envious of CEO' s either. They literally have no lives, whats the point of making all that dough if you don't got time to spend it? I will look up that report though.

  • How can you speculate if you don't understand? All you have to do is research it even a little bit. Ice core samples tell the whole story. It's got nothing to do with Billy Bob v.s the Liberals.

  • I guess. I have heard of the ice core samples but then again, there was the Medieval Warm period (800AD-1200AD) and that was speculated to have been worse than our worst case scenarios and guess what, people flourished.

    Same thing back about 5,000 years ago the overall warmer temperature of the planet (about 5 degrees higher than today Fahrenheit) was what made Egypt lush and prosperous, not the desert it is now.

    I do not deny Global warming but I believe that our involvement is exaggerated.

  • Again instead of just hearing about it. Look into it. There have been warming periods in the past that is not evidence against climate change. Look at the scale. Look at the fact that the worlds population has quadrupled since the 60's

    You said 5,000 years ago the earth was warmer. What is that based on?

    Let's forget the gut feeling and just look at the information.

  • You think us cutting down millions of acres has no effect? You think that when you throw that trash out it just disappears? Let us for once second forget global WARMING. That's controversial. What isn't, is all the trash we throw out - it is HURTFUL, and it's NOT over exaggerated, in fact it's often ignored.

  • As a final note, I'm liberal but I'm not envious of those rich CEOs. In fact, I would like to be one myself (too bad I'm a physica major and not a BA major). Wealth and success are not something anyone should be guilty about. In fact, an industrialist should be proud: it is she who makes all the comforts of modern life possible, it is she who makes the 21st century go round. But as Japanese industrialists have shown us, industrial success doesn't have to translate to tons of greenhouse gases.

  • Come on Cnn, this is a joke right? Daryl Hanna a climate expert? Give me a break here. I only see one expert maybe. Dr. Lomborg. The rest a either profiteers and/or bureaucrats. How about real scientists from both sides of the issue.

  • Al Gore is the biggest fuckin hipocrite and scammer on the face of the planet! His gas alone from his fat ass is emitting toxic carbons that are destroying the ozone! Anyone here remember in the 80s that whole dont use cans of hairspray because its destroying the atmosphere bullshit? This is no different. The earth changes on its own, thats what it does Al. You stupid money hungry pathetic motherfucker!!!! You and Di Caprio need to stop scamming naive people!

  • great nickname - yes you are one nasty piece of work. Love this anonymous slanging match. If you had one functioning neuron you might appreciate the fact that life on this planet has evolved with this planet to create a stable atmosphere conducive to life. Think about it. Yes we are fucking it up big time. You obviously don't even have one functioning neuron or you choose to think with your arse, most likely the latter. You are the moron undoubtedly. Grow a brain and think a little about it.....

  • like the name do ya? i dont respond to unintelligent morons that speak garbage! so, you may be excused IDIOT!

  • Why is Daryl Hannah so unbelievably embarrasing...?

  • ...It's yet another money grab by the elie govt leaders. Should we use wind turbines to blow the deep, cold snow off of our streets? Question the experts. Do they know anything? Daryl Hannah...shut up and act!

  • "It will trap more heat, melt more ice" - sure wish it would do so in Iowa right now.

  • "a panel of climate experts, including... Daryl Hannah"????

    lol, I think the average citizen is better qualified than she is.

  • i dont know how people can say global warming doesnt excist. wat about the kyoto protocol? pretty much the whole world, including third world countries, have sighnedit???their whole objective is to stabilize the climate..think about it pple...no one has ever made such a fuss over a "hoax"

  • U dont know because u are only listening to 1 source for ur info-im assuming. If u research u will find that most scientist's actually disagree with man made warming. Fact is, a lot of ppl believe in it and alot dont. But since when should you decide something is true because the majority believe it is?

    Hell, majority thought the earth was flat once upon a time.

    Check the facts out for urself and then make a logical choice. Nvr follow anyone blindly! Or ull be taken for a ride fella!

  • @foxycat90210 It is a physical impossibility for there to be "global" warming. At best it only happens one hemisphere at a time.

  • the thing is dat it affects everyone differently...in some places its dr\yer and hotter and in some its wetter and colder, the climates are becoming extreme

  • Thats because it doesnt exist you moron!!! They were running this bullshit during the 70s and the sun was already supposed to have burned us all. Get off it already, its a bunch of scammers taking you for a ride buddy! Never has it been as freezing as it has in England in 30 yrs. Among other places its dropping as well. Global warming my ass. Al Gores ass i should say!!!

  • it affects all temps differentlly!!!global warming doesnt necesarily mean that its getting hotter everywere simutaniously...all the contrary! its not going to happen everywere at the same time, so some places r flooding and some r drying out

  • Dont you find it a little odd foxy that the people that are tellin us to change our light bulbs, drive hybrids and conserve energy are amongst the biggest offenders of all these things? Not to mention mega millionaires? Al Gore uses more energy in his mansion and sucks down more fuel in his private jets alone than probably a whole entire state! I wanna see Al Gores electric bill, seriously. Let me see it! Leonardo too with all those frikin lights they use to film his movies! Bunch of hipocrites!

  • Comment removed

  • None of these so called 'experts' are experts in anything. Bring in some scientists instead of liberal actors/writers and I'll consider taking what I hear seriously. BIASEDDD

  • Why was African history ommitted in school. It is the cradle of civilization. The ancient Egyptians, not the Arabs, were spiritually in tune with the universe. This bible is very strange and hard to understand if interpreted as a story of real life events, but it all makes perfect sense when understood as an astronomical allegory.

  • Another one sided debate, Full of fucking shills with personal gains, Fuck your agenda and fuck your lies.

    CO2 is suddenly not natural? how do plants survive? can you believe this nonsense, no CO2 has nothing to do with climate change you fucking tools. there is no correlation what so ever, can we get some real '' scientists'' in here? no of course you wont, you'll get the same shills and bureaucrats to do your dirty bidding. And dont fucking call us deniers, you're the fucking deniers of truth

  • its not the CO2 itselfe really...its the amounts being emitted...too much of anything is bad

  • Every single so-called expert denying global warming isn't caused by CO2 is paid either by an energy company or a right-wing think tank. On the other hand, the climate scientists who agree near-unanimously on the human role in global warming beg for money from the National Science Foundation & other funding agencies. Take your goddamned claims of "shill" & "personal gain" & shove them right up your motherfucking worthless ass. There are no more one-sided scum than the right-wing.

  • All i read from your comment is '' right wing, right wing'', just proves you're a fucking moron, turning this into a political issue, just because i happened to know global warming is a scam, doesnt mean i'm a ''right wing'' another lame ad hominem from a lame moron, I happened to be neither left or right of the paradigm, im smart enough to distinct in essence both parties left or right, are pretty much the same, when it policies. Go shove your opinion up your ass cunt! cuz i dont give a fuck!

  • @dellbalboa " you're a fucking moron, turning this into a political issue"

    No, the people turinging it into a political issue are the right-wing think tanks funded by oil companies. That's who's making it a political issue. The partisanship & propaganda are unending & glaring.

    "i happened to know global warming is a scam"

    That's right. Scientists who've spent their lives studying climate concur its anthropogenically caused, but you - who has never been to a scientific meeting - know.

  • See what is the plan for this earth at "Fall of the republic" here on youtube. You will see the plan and how you will lose your freedom and rights as a human. OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES AND SEE THE LIE THAY ARE TELLING YOU. THEY THINK YOU ARE DUMB AND KNOW YOUR ARE GOING TO GO WITH WHAT THEY SAY BECAUSE THEY SAY IT SO MUCH. IF SOMETHING IS REPEATED ENOUGH YOU WILL BELEAVE IT IT AND THEY KNOW IT. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @dellbalboa I dont think that its the fact that Carbon dioxide(Co2) is the cause i think that its that fact the so many trees have been chopped down that they cannot control the co2 level. Its not co2 thats destroying its just there isnt a natural balance.

  • @RealFutureStar33 Actually, the correlation between CO2 increases and increases in temp are reverse. CO2 increases as the temp goes up, not the other way around. So they have couched it in this, and now try to sell people "carbon credits".

    The real reason the temp increases is simply part of the cycle of the world. Now, this isnt saying pollution is good, just that their logic and motives are wrong.

  • @ShadowSandy

    Hmm

    im starting to think that the trees dont have enough time to regenerate co2 thats why theres more

  • @RealFutureStar33 Interestingly enough, the ocean produces quite a bit of CO2 that rises drastically in production as temp goes up. Its kinda neat really.

  • @dellbalboa its one sided because there are not many people stupid enough to argue against SCIENTIFIC FACTS.

  • just another one sided "debate" to push an agenda. Most people will wake up eventually and say dame were stupid.

  • Typical CNN bias. "Climate experts"!? I hardly consider a secretary, an actress, an author or even a political scientist experts on climate change!

    Get real scientists!

    Also labelling Lomborg the 'resident skeptic' is misleading.... he still believes global warming is man-made.

    CNN this is not a debate.... this is a "systematic manipulation of psychological and social influence" ie media brainwashing.

  • "global warming is real (it can either cool or warm, but it has been cooling for the last decade), it's man made(nope), it is a problem (nope it was much warmer in medeival times and there were polar bears back then, but if global warming is ever a problem there isnt much we can do about it because we did not cause it) we need to make policys which don't turn the consumer off from costs, yadada not answering the statement made by felix.

  • thats a nice poem but c02 emissions hardly account for climate change, 115 on the way to copenhagen but, less then 20 signed on, am i right? Guess it wasn't such a consensus huh.

  • Would have been nice to have had some climatologists on the panel.

  • Not all scientists agree in Global Warming . One such organization is ICSC (international Climate Science Coalition). But the mainstream media is only interested in highlighting the views of scientists and politicians who are sympathetic to the views of IPCC. Why?

  • Poisoning of ecology with application of the nuclear weapon, application DU in shells, the chemical, bacteriological weapon... 20 centuries has been filled by it. The lecturer has told about it?

  • Fuck the human race we should all die we are not any good to the planet

  • Here's my debate.... CNN STAY OFF YOUTUBE!

  • maybe this will help. search.......The Decline And Fall Of The Human Race.

  • eh if u put ice in water and  the ice melts it stays the same does that not prove there no global warming

  • how is this a debate? there is no one there that refutes man made global warming...what a farce!

  • Most people realize the earth's axis has a tilt (which causes summer and winter) but few realize the axis also has a wobble.

    That wobble (over a 26,000 year cycle) does change the climate - not human industry (which produces less than 1/10 of the CO2 in our atmosphere).

    Skeptics are convinced that "carbon credits" and the nuclear power industry are behind global warming hysteria!

  • The atmosphere contains roughly (by volume) 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.038% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases.

    Air also contains a variable amount of water vapor, on average around 1%.

    Skeptics can read!

  • fags

  • Please stop the bullshit, the climate is constantly changing, always has always will !

    Just another way to sell you  "cleaner cars, fridges.....".

  • I hate poetry.

  • ...your face is experiencing climate change

  • why is this video so popular in Pakistan?

  • Did anyone else notice that all of the "climate experts," not one was a scientist? And that they are all of the belief that global warming is caused by humanity, not a natural cycle of the earth. To state that we have sufficient data to "prove," that climate change is caused by humans, you would need data from tens of thousands of years. Climate shifts take enormous amounts of time to occur (ie. the last ice age), are normal cycles of the earth.

  • We do have data from tens of thousands of years if not hundreds of thoudands of years in ice cores. They show that CO2 is the highest it has been in 2 milion years. Yes, there has been warmer and colder periods in tha past, but it is the rate at which the climate is changing not the absolute change in temperature that is a concern.

  • Fair enough. If they really want to cut CO2 levels, why not stop logging? And plant trees? Not only does it cut CO2 levels, but it also stops soil erosion, amongst other things. Why are they not looking for simple, natural (and cheaper) solutions?

  • @lowanfast True , making a massive movement to replant forests would even crate lots of jobs that cannot be out-sourced to other nations and would help alot!

  • Because it's money, you think governments want to do that and loose money?

  • @ XwilddaisyX Intriguingly enough, it's because of money that they don't want to do anything about "climate change" at all.

  • In fact there is a big push to enhance biological sequestration using reforestation, wetland restoration and wetland preservation. Also, industries are going to need to account for the emissions associated with landuse change. So for example if you are an industry that is draining peatlands in order to access a certain resource you will need to report that emissions associated with peatland loss.

  • Well, there's quite a lot of reforestation to do. I fly over quite a large area of country, and there are a lot (and I mean a lot!) of areas that have simply been clearcut without any sign of reforestation.

    Frankly, reporting what emissions have been associated with the wetland loss doesn't DO anything. It just says "Hey, here's what we've done to the land" and then move on.

  • co2 is not a polutant and its concentration was 10 times biger in recorded history. industry produces 1% of all CO2. only 5% of all greenhouse gases is co2.

    0,05% - this is how much industry efects climate, this is nothing

  • @pbadiou

    Bullbiscuits. Leaving aside Mann's utterly discredited hockey-stick nonsense, the rate of change now is nothing unique. You can continue shilling for the climate change religion, but nobody is listening.

  • I am not going to list the number of references that show the increased rate of change, but I am guessing you can't show me one that shows that the current rate of change is similar to historical natural changes. There are numerous other studies that found the exact same relationship that Mann did using different proxies.........so in short you are full of shit.

    By the way, many people are listening and narrow minded people like you will soon be wondering why they waited so long to act.

  • These people need to hear about George Carlin.FFS some emissions and plastic bags won't destroy this planet, sure it kill mankind but not the planet.

  • this is not a debate,,,this is pay by somebody...what bull shit is this..

  • @miath you are a redneck idiot. You don't deserve to live on this planet. Is it a surprise to you to hear the truth that this planet's climate is the way it is due to 4 billion years of evolution and ecosystems? You destroy the chemistry of the planet and then severely hamper life's ability to compensate and regulate - then what do you expect? YES, climate change.

  • @globalgovernor

    The climate changes. It has always changed. No amount of your religious zealotry will stop it changing. While you and your fellow religionists are bleating on about CO2 being a poison and demanding we all pay more tax to make amends, real enviornmental problems are being ignored.

  • huckteeper. This debate is like trying to reason with imbeciles or aliens from another planet. I am not a religious zealot but in fact an atheist. Life has been on this planet for 4 billion years. Yes the climate has always changed but there are innumerable negative feedback systems in the ecosystems and biosphere which serve to regulate our climate and keep it stable. We are both altering the climate and severely hampering the biosphere's ability to respond appropriately. Gaia by Lovelock.

  • What do you call stable as far as climate is concerned?

  • Yea, lol i guess all these years of using light bulbs is what did it huh? God, when will people like you just hang yourselves already? You really are extremely misinformed and ignorant! Grow up idiot!!!

  • wake up this is only to make money,,,,

  • I only watched this because I thought I saw Morgan Freeman. Turns out, it was just Kofi Annan...

    Jokes, jokes.

    To be perfectly honest though, I think we should feel embarrassed about how this summit came and went with nothing happening.

  • Utter bullshit, typical from CNN.

  • btw...check out the documental future by design, it's a good answer to all this problems

  • climate change it's not man made, but we sure make it worst...

  • Where is Potholer54 and the host of scientists who actually have collected evidence for either side of this topic? Hannah? ROFL. Like something of significance can come from thisYves de Boer should be ashamed to mount the stage with such bloggers/antagonists. This is like having a debate on gay marriage when every one on the panel is gay

  • 911 was an internal job. See "ZeitGeist" film.

  • It's absolutely embarrassing to consider the content of those videos sent in by the public. That one guy was blaming global warming for the fact that it's been raining at his house! What astonishing collective ignorance when someone has a run of bad weather and blames it on climate change, and no one bats an eyelid. Human beings are capable of being grotesquely stupid.

  • That poem at the start is the most embarrassingly lame thing I have ever had to sit through. Absolutely painful. How can that guy have any remaining self respect?

  • I think he got the idea from Al Gore reading climate change poetry... Now THERES a man that can ruin your day with non-prose writing

  • ...who would be against cleaner air and water anyway?

  • ...well, deniers can keep whine because most countries has declared GW a man made problem and will reduce co2...COP15 may not have been a true success but with so many world leaders trying to reach a common agreement, what`d ya expect?

  • Caps on emissions are a waste of time and won't work. The reason people are pushing for them is because they have confused stopping global warming with punishing corporate greed. If people really want to save the planet they need to stop making this about anti capitalist ideology and start thinking in terms of results. Investing in solar solutions and things like lab produced meat (to cut emissions from livestock) are the real answer. Want to change the world? Then make change profitable.

  • yeah...green energy IS where new jobs and profit is..or will be in the near future

  • All greedy scum bag treasonous corp rats need to be hunted down and put to death!

    There steeling Billions now they want more for there poisoned mess.

    What a scam!!!!

  • I find it interesting that nobody addresses the growing body of evidence that shows Global Warming has now tapered off, and was NOT caused by human behaviors. Mars is going through a similar change....and is devoid of humans!

    I agree with creating cleaner fuel options-I believe that far too much bloodshed has occurred over "oil". But I do not agree with setting the stage for a world wide government or a body of people to "police" other countries. This, I believe, sets a dangerous precedent..

  • Btw if u believe in climate change ur a stupid idiot.

  • That first fag with the poem shud get a beating. What a moron.

  • Ok I am from the 3rd world, but I am a person too.

  • Copenhagen treaty is against the USA constitution. I'm a pagan/wiccan I totally understand about mother Earth. But don't believe other intentions are not noble to cure mother Earth but to destroy the Large capital countries. There are other ways.