@zoolkhan You're right. The gear wasn't stressed and there was no damage to the aircraft. The landing was overall smooth (albeit lopsided at first). Don't understand where the question is here.
@RellyOhBoy I'm sorry, how many do you have? Are you even a pilot? Pilots try to make every landing their best or at least better than the first, and in the pilot world you somewhat "compete" against each other on a better landing than the other. You may know this if you were a pilot. Get off my back.
@nrocci84 I'm not an ATP....I have a private pilot cert. single engine piston. I have quite a few hours in a PA 28 Piper Dakota.
You seem to have it all wrong dude. Its not a competition when you are carrying a plane full of passengers. The goal is to get your passengers, your crew and your ship from point A to point be as safely as possible. A pilot you are not and If you are....remind me to stay out of your airspace.
Airliners have to be flown by the book. Perfect example of a so called "competition" gone wrong. Pinnicle Flight 3701. Two morons tried to play test pilot and take a CRJ to its service ceiling, both engines flamed out, they couldn't relight them. Crashed and burned.
@RellyOhBoy by the book? Well since we are using evidence on flight accidents, Air Trans 236, one gallon per min fuel leak, the book said to cross feed the fuel and they did, and in doing so emptied all their good fuel. You need to think about all your actions.
Also, I am not condoning what they did, thats ridiculous, you don't play test pilot with people on board, however you STRIVE to be the BEST PILOT! with the best landings! thats all I am saying!
it was a good landing. Automatic Ground Spoilers work with the ground shift mechanic. That why at first touch the tyre did not spin enought to activated the Spoilers at second touch both gear spin spoilers deploy and sink aircraft into the runway. Ground Spoilers do the 60% of breaking that's why they are so important
This isn't a crosswind landing. Surface wind 060 at 10 knots, you're cleared to land on 06 Right. It's a perfect 10 knot headwind. It should be a textbook landing. Especially when as a student pilot, I've made better landings in a 152 with 10 knots crosswind (bearing in mind I'm doing 65 knots on final not 140).
Did anyone think to ask why after both main gears were down there was no reverse thrust until maybe... 7 seconds later? Usually it's much sooner than that?
Not a perfect landing but successful. Apparently there were some crosswinds as the plane crossed the runway threshold. The pilots earned another days pay.
I'd give the pilot a 8 of 10. The plane wasn't really running over the runway before he kind of dumped it shortly , at the beginning of the runway , like you might where in an emergency , you were landing on a shorter than normal strip for the aircraft you were landing. Bouncing back and forth between sets of landing gear is not good. Not to mention that crosswinds could have made that landing worse.
not bad for a guy who lands maybe 4-5 times a month, hehehe.. sink rate was high at the end, obviously, requiring a bit more flare than normal, but handled smoothly
Must keep in mind that Airliners go for what is called a "Positive landing" - the type of landing where the aircraft gets on the deck and stays on the deck.
It would appear that he was operating "on the back side" of the power curve; yes, he did save it. Might have been an airspeed indication problem (both?). Can't always tell with all of the computers that display the information, at this point in time. But, he recovered nicely!
GOOD landing , skilled pilot (captain) , bad landing configuration , but a fast and skilled flare. u can see at the threshold the airplane start to decent faster , could be a windshear . i say bad landing configuration because there was much flare in the landing , and that is not a right procedure for a normal landing .
How can you guys say if it was a good or bad landing if you don't have the wind component if at that time, if you dont know if there was any windshear, if you don't know the aircraft's weight, etc...
STOP CRITICIZING THIS LANDING!! Landings at Manchester can be VERY difficult! This was a AWESOME landing!! Every landing is good! As long as you don't suffer for it!!
The 767 is actually kind of tricky to land. It can hold so much weight and the plane rolls-out very differently depending on how much fuel weight it has left over. If it has quite a bit of fuel left over, heavy, i will usually reduce power but not all the way at about 20ft and kind of just fly it onto the runway. If its light, 5% fuel remaining, I'll idle the engines at 30ft, and begin the roll out very late (20 ft). This pilot looked like he cut the power a bit soon.
@d0rkiishchris AFAIK 767 pilots also fly the 757 and they have different landing characteristics. This could be another factor. Also, the 767 has downward tilting landing gear which seems to make landings firmer, like the A380.
It was "OK"; just looked like the approach speed was a bit less than it should have been. Probably caused by the "high attitude floating" approach. He did, however, pull it all together, at the end, and all was well that ended well!
This could have been far worse. There is a video where a FedEx flight lands in Tokyo. One gear hits by itself, snaps and the aircraft disintegrates. Killed both pilots.
what is bad is the ATC giving an updated QNH at that stage of final approach. But otherwise it appears they encountered sink over the threshold and made a satisfactory landing.
You do know that if you do a landing in say a 737 'by the book', you are actually drop it onto the deck quite firmly, because then it's less likely to bounce and veer off the runway. However if you're really greasing it in and get some wind shear...
Looked like it had some windy conditions, perhaps a decent crosswind which can really rock a plane on short approach, so it was a fantastic landing considering the conditions.
The landing wasnt terrible at all, it was a ok landing, it seems from the video the pilot didn't quite flare high enough to compensate for the amout of drop he was getting but he pulled back a bit before he touched down so that was alright. all in all landing was safe and thats all that matters.
I agree with Mrfun07 you can hear him spool up just before landing to avoid landing shallow. Then I am sure the crosswinds kicked in and changed the perfect landing.
Well do you know what US Navy pilots say? "If you survived from a landing, well it is good". Manchester is not a easy Airport. It iis subject to heavy crosswinds and landing is not so easy in this condition. Well i think this landing is not bad...
Excessive sink rate that was caused by the pilots late attempt to apply more power. You can hear the engines spooling up, but the lag time between adding power, and getting it, is a lot longer than most of us realize. . . Up to seven seconds, or even longer. . . I'm sure the weather contributed as well. Some mild windshear, or crosswind gust, although I don't see much control surface activity. I think it's a mis-judged sink rate.
that's a crosswind landing;)
p0aco 1 month ago
Just a tiny wobble its alright
a330ftw 2 months ago
10 knot crosswind...not bad
lycoming333 3 months ago
I have seen far worst.
fooksake69 3 months ago
GOOD
stealhty1 4 months ago
good
felix09111 5 months ago
the landing was pretty good. i dont understand why there is even a discussion about it.
zoolkhan 5 months ago
@zoolkhan You're right. The gear wasn't stressed and there was no damage to the aircraft. The landing was overall smooth (albeit lopsided at first). Don't understand where the question is here.
Keys879 5 months ago
I would have added a touch more power before landing. The roll out did not appear to slow the descent rate.
rkjessop 5 months ago
Nice landing, nothing wrong with it. Good adjustments to wind conditions.
Mithrin126 6 months ago
its a good landing or cool
arsch621 6 months ago
haha keeping that wheelie after a one two three ! nice nose wheel greaser chump
haitiano1982 7 months ago
Good landing
doggydog472 7 months ago
I like this one, nice job AA !
9500GTa4 7 months ago
He had came in with just a little too much power, which is why the plane wanted to keep flying....i would say just an alright landing
nrocci84 7 months ago
@nrocci84 And how many hours do you have on the Triple 7 ??? None you say???
Oh ok...
RellyOhBoy 6 months ago
And how many hours do you have on the 767 ??? None you say???
Oh ok...
RellyOhBoy 6 months ago
@RellyOhBoy I'm sorry, how many do you have? Are you even a pilot? Pilots try to make every landing their best or at least better than the first, and in the pilot world you somewhat "compete" against each other on a better landing than the other. You may know this if you were a pilot. Get off my back.
nrocci84 6 months ago 2
@nrocci84 I'm not an ATP....I have a private pilot cert. single engine piston. I have quite a few hours in a PA 28 Piper Dakota.
You seem to have it all wrong dude. Its not a competition when you are carrying a plane full of passengers. The goal is to get your passengers, your crew and your ship from point A to point be as safely as possible. A pilot you are not and If you are....remind me to stay out of your airspace.
RellyOhBoy 6 months ago
Airliners have to be flown by the book. Perfect example of a so called "competition" gone wrong. Pinnicle Flight 3701. Two morons tried to play test pilot and take a CRJ to its service ceiling, both engines flamed out, they couldn't relight them. Crashed and burned.
RellyOhBoy 6 months ago
@RellyOhBoy by the book? Well since we are using evidence on flight accidents, Air Trans 236, one gallon per min fuel leak, the book said to cross feed the fuel and they did, and in doing so emptied all their good fuel. You need to think about all your actions.
Also, I am not condoning what they did, thats ridiculous, you don't play test pilot with people on board, however you STRIVE to be the BEST PILOT! with the best landings! thats all I am saying!
nrocci84 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And how many hours do you have on the 757 ??? None you say???
Oh ok...
RellyOhBoy 6 months ago
Not a bad landing, probably the only thing was that it looked like he had to align himself with the runway a bit after touchdown...
miksta1988 7 months ago
Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing. This one wasn't that bad.
poindexterdick 7 months ago
asi aterrizo yo en fsx, si no es tan facil como para ir muy bien alineadito.
fl4v100xx 7 months ago
if u can walk off from it then u str8 .
FirstFlight271 7 months ago
it was a good landing. Automatic Ground Spoilers work with the ground shift mechanic. That why at first touch the tyre did not spin enought to activated the Spoilers at second touch both gear spin spoilers deploy and sink aircraft into the runway. Ground Spoilers do the 60% of breaking that's why they are so important
HugoAndres 8 months ago
This isn't a crosswind landing. Surface wind 060 at 10 knots, you're cleared to land on 06 Right. It's a perfect 10 knot headwind. It should be a textbook landing. Especially when as a student pilot, I've made better landings in a 152 with 10 knots crosswind (bearing in mind I'm doing 65 knots on final not 140).
ConradTheCruel 8 months ago
Poor for a simple 10kts
tomellis6680 8 months ago
It looks like you can use the airplane again, that makes it a good landing!
ZigZagMarquis 8 months ago
@ZigZagMarquis No that makes it a GREAT landing.
Flightagressor97 8 months ago
It looks like you can use the airplane again, that makes it a good landing! ;-)
ZigZagMarquis 8 months ago
Have to call it a good landing. He just had to kick some rudder to keep the plane aligned with the runway. It wasn't pretty, however.
herbergreen 8 months ago
Very bad Landing...
andresddr 8 months ago
yea, for a crosswind landing at Manchester, this is pretty good!
chomkohome 8 months ago
very good landing
nikardem 8 months ago
Looks fine to me.
Milesco 8 months ago
Nothing wrong with that landing. No two are the same.
kolbpilot 8 months ago
maybe you need to wait until the aircraft is stable before applying reverse thrust? Im not sure though...
tobymitch 9 months ago
Did anyone think to ask why after both main gears were down there was no reverse thrust until maybe... 7 seconds later? Usually it's much sooner than that?
TheMeslava 9 months ago
@TheMeslava Mains must touch down first then nosewheel, then reverse prevents the nosewheel from slamming on down.
ccr26 9 months ago
@ccr26 reverse does the opposite it pulls the aircraft backwards thus pulling the nose down
Aviationnation10 9 months ago
He flared a bit late I think
RichyJam2011 9 months ago
SINK RATE-- BADD
BigBearVids 9 months ago
Horrible landing in every possible way! But i guess that's the AA way of doing things. Shitty airline!
Andribakari 9 months ago
good!!!!!
Saidasror777 9 months ago
Not a perfect landing but successful. Apparently there were some crosswinds as the plane crossed the runway threshold. The pilots earned another days pay.
newbeefly 9 months ago
I say its good. He didn't mess up badly or anything.
cholomackdaddy 9 months ago
Very small bad.
andreasilve 10 months ago
seen much worse end much worse....
rAvensBBr 10 months ago
given the circumstances a pretty nice landing.
pocomedy 10 months ago
8/10 :D
anurek123 10 months ago
ang babaw naman ng nsa description mo.... funny na ba seo un...? baka sabihin ko palang na kikilitiin kita mtatawa ka na....
its good landing... yes why because they land safe... theres no such thing as bad landing bad landing is equal to crash landing...
hanzel1 10 months ago
I'd give the pilot a 8 of 10. The plane wasn't really running over the runway before he kind of dumped it shortly , at the beginning of the runway , like you might where in an emergency , you were landing on a shorter than normal strip for the aircraft you were landing. Bouncing back and forth between sets of landing gear is not good. Not to mention that crosswinds could have made that landing worse.
fthrcast 10 months ago
good
milko1998 10 months ago
This is addicting. I'm watching it over and over.
ampdTunes 10 months ago
Normal landing !
PIPOUSE1 11 months ago
it seemed fine to me
flyewr1907 11 months ago
not bad for a guy who lands maybe 4-5 times a month, hehehe.. sink rate was high at the end, obviously, requiring a bit more flare than normal, but handled smoothly
johnuio 11 months ago
Good coglione!
maurix79sarzana 11 months ago
Very good landing.
DirtyThing20 11 months ago
Nice landing!
08687435701 11 months ago
this happens 797 times a day
thegilles6 11 months ago
the pilot was overccontrolling
MyPilot747 11 months ago
@MyPilot747 lol! How the hell can you tell that!?!?
Lharmanfly 11 months ago
its obvious even a retard can notice that
MyPilot747 11 months ago
Must keep in mind that Airliners go for what is called a "Positive landing" - the type of landing where the aircraft gets on the deck and stays on the deck.
mono1geek 1 year ago
nice three wheel landing.. very smooth.. also remember the capo and first officer has been up for more then 8 hours flying and tired.. not bad....
inbound1000 1 year ago
It would appear that he was operating "on the back side" of the power curve; yes, he did save it. Might have been an airspeed indication problem (both?). Can't always tell with all of the computers that display the information, at this point in time. But, he recovered nicely!
mmichaeldonavon 1 year ago
bad
gypsykingg 1 year ago
well down i would say.......... possibly a bit of warm air pushing her up
MissThunderPuss 1 year ago
I love how American pilots only respond with their callsign instead of repeating what atc said...
ATC: American 54 turn next left
AA Pilot: American 54
hello1233280 1 year ago
It was a good save, that's what it was.
bronco8585 1 year ago
Looked good to me!
mdo686 1 year ago
i have a vid of my landing... hopefully trying to do my solo on my 16th birthday!! :D
check it out!
jamie190595 1 year ago
better than my landings. it dropped right from underneath him, but recuperated nicely and kept the nose from touchind down hard,. Good landing
elcasquito 1 year ago
that's what pilots call a "one two" landing, not good, but not bad either
jboycub7 1 year ago
dont see anything wrong with that :\
cozcoz2010 1 year ago
you can se the windshear at 0:20
tiomawi 1 year ago
GOOD landing , skilled pilot (captain) , bad landing configuration , but a fast and skilled flare. u can see at the threshold the airplane start to decent faster , could be a windshear . i say bad landing configuration because there was much flare in the landing , and that is not a right procedure for a normal landing .
tiomawi 1 year ago
@tiomawi
How can you tell that the Captain was flying?
THESKYMASTER 1 year ago
Better than I could do !!
carlsberg1964 1 year ago
any landing you can walk on your feet is a good one. Any landing you can walk on your feet and the plane can be used again is an excellent one :)
This one is a very good one. It looks like a shear on the flare an a pretty steep slope on final approach.
kzmooo17 1 year ago
IT LOOKS LIKE A WINDSHEAR ON THE THRESHOLD!
larrybueno 1 year ago
how about average?!
Lettenbichler 1 year ago
it was a unique landing
donchitch 1 year ago
Considering there was some wind I guess it was a good landing! Any landing u can walk away from is a good landing!
aircraftfreak737 1 year ago
For me...........BAD.............
begamorta69 1 year ago
How can you guys say if it was a good or bad landing if you don't have the wind component if at that time, if you dont know if there was any windshear, if you don't know the aircraft's weight, etc...
Planespotter11 1 year ago
low speed landing.......dangerous
DENEBOBI 1 year ago
@DENEBOBI
All landing are low speed otherwise they won't land. I assume you do not fly with a comment like that.
skudrunners 1 year ago
Comment removed
DENEBOBI 1 year ago
Simple - landing is good not landing is not good.
cupomash2 1 year ago
Starboard to port to starboad main wheel touchdowns are noy unusual. No problem with that landing.
edsgoldens1 1 year ago
STOP CRITICIZING THIS LANDING!! Landings at Manchester can be VERY difficult! This was a AWESOME landing!! Every landing is good! As long as you don't suffer for it!!
wizzair1313 1 year ago 10
@wizzair1313 ...my uncle (pilot) used to say: "any landing you can walk away from was a great one."
TheRevJonnyNemo 6 months ago
The 767 is actually kind of tricky to land. It can hold so much weight and the plane rolls-out very differently depending on how much fuel weight it has left over. If it has quite a bit of fuel left over, heavy, i will usually reduce power but not all the way at about 20ft and kind of just fly it onto the runway. If its light, 5% fuel remaining, I'll idle the engines at 30ft, and begin the roll out very late (20 ft). This pilot looked like he cut the power a bit soon.
d0rkiishchris 1 year ago
@d0rkiishchris AFAIK 767 pilots also fly the 757 and they have different landing characteristics. This could be another factor. Also, the 767 has downward tilting landing gear which seems to make landings firmer, like the A380.
Edwiness 1 year ago
as we know autopilot can land aircraft smoothly and safely, so why always pilots land manually even in good weather?
XosrovTheGreat 1 year ago
probably some wind too..
olioli917 1 year ago
not the best of lanidngs,but like everyone said here,if the passengers and the plane is safe then its better to give credit to the pilot..
timecop73 1 year ago
It was "OK"; just looked like the approach speed was a bit less than it should have been. Probably caused by the "high attitude floating" approach. He did, however, pull it all together, at the end, and all was well that ended well!
mmichaeldonavon 1 year ago
Does American never fly one of those 4 engine planes ? All the way from US on a 2 engine 1 ?
smartdon007 1 year ago
CA ARRIVE UN JOUR OU L'AUTRE ! ya pas de pilote qui n'a jamais connus ca ! .... en plus on a pas les données de l'atterrissage.. donc ;)
furtif000 1 year ago
I'd say it was a good landing. He corrected the heavy sink rate just in time. A bit wobbly, but all ended well.
Coaljet 1 year ago
Bad landing
xMrBrun0x 1 year ago
not the best
iguanaboy100 1 year ago
AIRPLANE WHEELIE!!
R0YN0198 1 year ago
Pilot in control probably had to scatch his balls or something
Rwy02 1 year ago 4
Looks like a cross wind landing to me.
Transam941 1 year ago
This could have been far worse. There is a video where a FedEx flight lands in Tokyo. One gear hits by itself, snaps and the aircraft disintegrates. Killed both pilots.
overlordplumo 1 year ago
everyone has rough landings!
jeremypenuta 1 year ago
Looks like a text book cross wind landing. One set of wheels then the other right?
TheMichken 1 year ago
what is bad is the ATC giving an updated QNH at that stage of final approach. But otherwise it appears they encountered sink over the threshold and made a satisfactory landing.
samueljcat 1 year ago
@samueljcat If you listen carefully, they were giving the pilot an updated QNH number that likely updated just then and passed it on.
blackdog0301 1 year ago
or had touch down ...
KoQBoss 1 year ago
the right mature had dropped down at first --> thats not so good :D
but the passengers are happy that the plane generally lands.
KoQBoss 1 year ago 17
A bit rough, But good landing, THEY WALKED AWAY! SO WHAT CAN YOU SAY?
Flyglobespan93 1 year ago
Notice how the Right hand wing (our Left) dropped just before touch down-
Maybe caused by a bit of wake turbulance caused by a large aircraft just arriving ahead of it.
On that basis great landing and control!
veg818 1 year ago
Bad Landing....
Huevinh 1 year ago
Any landing in which you can use the plane again is a 'great landing'
vfrl7r 1 year ago
very bad landing
Blackarrow8918 1 year ago
Look at the tail rudder, not too hard to see there is quite a strong cross-wind.
blairoldham 1 year ago
it was abit rough
appleglory 1 year ago
You do know that if you do a landing in say a 737 'by the book', you are actually drop it onto the deck quite firmly, because then it's less likely to bounce and veer off the runway. However if you're really greasing it in and get some wind shear...
sheldonholy 1 year ago
ok landing.. not much of a flare.. just a quick transition to the runway. no prob with that !
maddooggg 1 year ago
Very BAD landing, shure ¡¡¡¡¡¡
blastdesal 1 year ago
Very BAD landing, shure ¡¡¡¡¡¡
blastdesal 1 year ago
I think its bad i have done teriible but planes arent saposed to bounce on lading i think that his flare was also too high
Fsadon 1 year ago
Most likely a very good landing...the pilot was obviously dealing with a cross wind.
SpeedyNeutrino43 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not bad, not good.
MrDanieldb 1 year ago
More like a fun landing haha
27 people were on that plane
iwantpk2 1 year ago
Looked like it had some windy conditions, perhaps a decent crosswind which can really rock a plane on short approach, so it was a fantastic landing considering the conditions.
bighaben 1 year ago
@bighaben wind was only 10knots
appleglory 1 year ago
good landing for manchester, i landed home so many times in worse.
hancock63663 1 year ago
Any landing you can walk away from is a 'good landing'!
Daedalus317 1 year ago 67
@Daedalus317 Any landing you can use the plane again is a 'Great Landing'!
CessnaAviator317 1 year ago
@Daedalus317 no actully. a good landing=smooth landing. it was a bad landing
90Blakey 1 year ago
@Daedalus317 What if you're handicapped?
MrAXDM 1 year ago
Seemed kind of clumsy.
MrDenizen 1 year ago
It didn't touch down level on main gear, might be a crosswind or gusts or maybe just a rookie pilot landing in calm weather...
bumpa25 1 year ago
not bad
jetairways773 1 year ago
i think it was well recovered it looked like it was dropping like a tonne of bricks!!
jpro747 1 year ago
i didnt blow and kill anyone so its a good landing
grimlock1944 1 year ago
This was a very good landing. Keep in mind this plane weighs about 400K pounds.
LLCoolCLo 1 year ago
Out of the bounce... this is an awesome landing!
superpilote31 1 year ago
Bravo!!!!!!!
loco151a1 1 year ago
ooh love it. very stylish. i love how the 767 dances.
funnydogger 1 year ago
Not the most glamorous of touchdowns ever but safe enough!!
mythicalireland 1 year ago
When you think you will make an excellent landing, it happens!!!
capartguerra 1 year ago
The landing wasnt terrible at all, it was a ok landing, it seems from the video the pilot didn't quite flare high enough to compensate for the amout of drop he was getting but he pulled back a bit before he touched down so that was alright. all in all landing was safe and thats all that matters.
joerox135 1 year ago
nice landing they just adjusted the main gear on the runway
bruninhooskt 1 year ago
UUUUUHHHHUUUU VERY NICE!!!!!!
MARCELLAO1111 1 year ago
like ms flight simulator landings
hammer3456 1 year ago
Nothing wrong with that landing. Perfectly normal crosswind landing.
joemasiclat 1 year ago
I agree with Mrfun07 you can hear him spool up just before landing to avoid landing shallow. Then I am sure the crosswinds kicked in and changed the perfect landing.
thermo1984 1 year ago
bad landing
TheAgarrity2622 1 year ago
I HATE AMERICAN, THEY WONT DO ANYTHING FOR US CONTROLLERS, ITS LIKE PULLING TEETH
jinxed071202 1 year ago
not bad they just lost a little balance
jayvon65 1 year ago
Looks like that one was handed to the first officer and captain jumped in.....
Aviator1111 1 year ago
Well do you know what US Navy pilots say? "If you survived from a landing, well it is good". Manchester is not a easy Airport. It iis subject to heavy crosswinds and landing is not so easy in this condition. Well i think this landing is not bad...
Napoleone747 1 year ago
Not the best but I wouldn't call it bad. Been on much worse.
Jackle61 1 year ago
Excessive sink rate that was caused by the pilots late attempt to apply more power. You can hear the engines spooling up, but the lag time between adding power, and getting it, is a lot longer than most of us realize. . . Up to seven seconds, or even longer. . . I'm sure the weather contributed as well. Some mild windshear, or crosswind gust, although I don't see much control surface activity. I think it's a mis-judged sink rate.
mrfun07 1 year ago
Been on worse !
nealsym49 1 year ago
there's no such thing as a bad landing. if you got the passengers and the plane on the ground, id say thats a good landing.
foopy6 1 year ago
thats a nice landing for a crosswind landing
Tracer2k 1 year ago
Any landing you walk away from is a good one.
KartKing4ever 1 year ago
YES LANDING IS CONSIDERED HARD @ Due to cross wind effect they lost airspeed and couldn arrest verticall speed properly ! during flare !
Early Thrust retard ! Next time take in accont thant ground effect is blow away in crosswind condition !
tbe555 1 year ago
thats not a bad landing!
WEBSTA380 1 year ago
thts a gd landing :)
Scofield201093 1 year ago
Good landing !!!
zitro72 1 year ago
Looked to me like they lost some speed / airspeed and had to give it some juice to decrease the sink rate....
ZbmwM5 1 year ago
1200 firm, but that is ok.
jgalvin69 1 year ago
Just a bit gusty x wind, not a bad landing
Timrabladet 1 year ago
Normal landing
gogamich 1 year ago
A landing you can walk away from is a good landing.
TheSoccerGoalkeeper 1 year ago