The game looks exactly the same when the new trailer came out 2 weeks ago as it did back in 07???? hmmm id come on get with new generation and stop with the 90s game play style this is 1993 anymore it 2011 and call of duty has better graphics engine than yours......that should be a kick to the balls
@TheAtomicsoda No there using a engine calld the creation engine they were originally gonna use id tech 5 but since the engine sucks ball bethesda made there own engine and yes it does suck they try to make it look all tech advanced but when it comes down to gameplay all it is is a generic typical id software game boring and repetitive don't belive me play doom 3 that game even back then wasn't that good and now adays ids 1993 game design and story shit just isn't gonna cut it anymore
@ranpo677 ya no shit huh i hate pc not only is pc overrated but like u said why spend 1000s and 1000s upgrading it every year when u can just by a console and know that your games gonna work cause even if u do by a great graphics card doesn't mean its gonna run smoothly pc sucks it may have good game but i can't play it i have to play on a controller
@halo6534 Cod has better graphics than this? COD runs on an id Tech3 engine with direct9x support. COD has massive video support with its 1999 Tech3 to spit out those graphics.
Tech5 could spit out what COD can on its own, without ANY video support. Btw "Halo", how does the Bungie engine you play on compare? Right. Learn engines, then games, then come back
only true nerds will argue which looks better, who gives a shit. as long as its fun and is playable i really don`t care. they all look good so leave it at that.
It was a shame though that nobody really used the previous Doom 3 engine (id Tech 4) because everyone was using the Unreal Engine. I love the textures and graphics of the Doom 3 engine and so I hope people will start using the id Tech 5 when it comes out.
Nice Nice Video. I really loved your video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed, check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 Channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.
Whats up with the suit, John? This really seems irrelevant to Mac gaming in general, Apple really doesnt give a shit about gaming and it shows, THATS why its still a niche for mac.
"We wanted to say OK, heres the build and run the same build on the PC, the 360, and the PS3. We still have to go through one extra step to build it on the Mac." - john carmack, shows what you know
id software make realy good engines and epic games too. (not for sandbox!!) for sandbox you,ll need to go to the crytekengine 2 or dunia engine for farcrt 2
I'm a PC user myself, but I have used the mac and it is incredibly powerful especially for media creation. I know that this new engine is going to be good because it was developed on the mac, and it would be really neat to see them release Doom4 for the mac, though I will be sure to use it on PC. In short, mac is a fantastic media creation tool, which is why it's so popular these days.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Compare the old Doom 3 tech vid model detail (=polycount) with the model detail in the actual D3 game ... they were a joke compared (Coneheads syndrome).
I'm POSITIVE the same thing will happen here again. Sorry John, but you can't fool me ...
Actually he's right in a way because they could sort out latency in the hardware unlike non-standard PC jumbles. If you're looking for pure gaming it's a better platform. If you're looking for graphical detail and performance then it's not.
I'm not a mac fan boy in any way. I don't own one, and I've got a good windows rig. I don't see why the two can't co-exist and I don't really think it's fair to be giving me thumbs down because I said that.
im not giving you any thumbs down at all, i think its great to have both of the systems running together, the mac is a good platform but its hardware isnt all that great
again didnt amaze me, pc has the best graphics, and if Steve Jobs lets games on macs, then how would he manage to give updates? i am sure he wont want his users open up the macs, change graphics cards and stuff...
Some games are inherently better on PC (first person shooter for example) and some are just better on consoles ( like racing games & sports games..But sports games are shit anyways)
@elementkid177 yeah then how do you explain the pc version of rage having low framerates, bad textures, and bad texture pop-in were the console version doesnt
and how the hell are they gonna adapt this technology to the 360?! Just 20GBs of texture, for one map XD PS3 will prevail. Pretty easy with the Blu-Ray format. But 360's DVDs are gonna have a hard time.
Oh and one other thing... considering the PS3 has about 1/3 of the effective available memory compared to 360, I imagine the PS3 will infact be the biggest source of headaches, relative to the other 3 platforms (PC, Mac, 360).
It's stuff like API/OS, toolchain, available RAM, bandwidth and data transfer latency that cause development headaches -- all of which are the worst on PS3 by a long shot. Not storage media.
The PS3 won't prevail just because it uses blu-ray. Storage media isn't the issue to porting complicated games to consoles. As a matter of opinion, the 360 and ps3 wont be that much different in the long run. However, graphical power wise, the 360 is better! Textures can be compressed as microsoft's platform has many effective tools. Don't be fooled by all this "PS3 this" nonsense. PC's have the best gear, and wont surpass it!
John Carmack is really really good. =) I didn't quite enjoy the Doom 3 game, but I enjoyed the progress report throughout the construction of the engine. But it should be much better with tech 5's.
If you look at one of the greatest games of all time they're built on id technology. For instance Half-Life, Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, all id technology as well as the Quake series ... One advantage that we have is that John's code is very clean, very robust, structured well, and seriously, if it wasn't for John Carmack the first-person industry and game industry would look very different so we're very confident with out plans and technology. - TW
yea, ur rite, although half life rewrote the quake engine 70%, which means its only 30% quake, thats alot. But john carmack's pretty amazing, although cryengine 2 is still a little better than the id tech 5
is Idtech 5 compatable with Dx11?
Seaction8 1 month ago
4 years for what, this? *spoiler* watch?v=PDKhlRCxNQg
nils4545 4 months ago
WTF! Is that someone moaning from 2:45???
TacticProductionz 5 months ago
@TacticProductionz lol does sound like that lol mmmm mmm mmm mm
andy19832009 4 months ago
Annoying R detected
argai1978 6 months ago
Why's he sharing a stage with that asshole jobs?
TheGreatSteve 7 months ago
cryengine 3 win, and source engine 2 soon
misaelfaust86 10 months ago
John Carmack FTW!!
bmabs35 11 months ago
The game looks exactly the same when the new trailer came out 2 weeks ago as it did back in 07???? hmmm id come on get with new generation and stop with the 90s game play style this is 1993 anymore it 2011 and call of duty has better graphics engine than yours......that should be a kick to the balls
halo6534 1 year ago
Is it me or at the end can I hear like a groan from him laughing and being nervous??
MartyHITD 1 year ago
I think this what they're using for Skyrim.
TheAtomicsoda 1 year ago
@TheAtomicsoda yeah thats why im here
Buckleofbelt 1 year ago
@TheAtomicsoda No there using a engine calld the creation engine they were originally gonna use id tech 5 but since the engine sucks ball bethesda made there own engine and yes it does suck they try to make it look all tech advanced but when it comes down to gameplay all it is is a generic typical id software game boring and repetitive don't belive me play doom 3 that game even back then wasn't that good and now adays ids 1993 game design and story shit just isn't gonna cut it anymore
halo6534 1 year ago
PC rules?It will always leave me wondering why you'd game on there if you have to constantly upgrade it to play games.
ranpo677 1 year ago
@ranpo677 *sigh* for the love of crap,WE DONT HAVE TO UPGRADE CONSTANTLY HARDWARE/SOFTWARE TO PLAY GAMES!!!!can't you learn already console gamers?
xan1242 1 year ago
@ranpo677 ya no shit huh i hate pc not only is pc overrated but like u said why spend 1000s and 1000s upgrading it every year when u can just by a console and know that your games gonna work cause even if u do by a great graphics card doesn't mean its gonna run smoothly pc sucks it may have good game but i can't play it i have to play on a controller
halo6534 1 year ago
So, we give up quality for interchangability?
dulinski1 1 year ago
@dulinski1 haha that exactly what i said so much for id software being at the top of there game they suck now cod has better graphics than this
halo6534 1 year ago
@halo6534 Cod has better graphics than this? COD runs on an id Tech3 engine with direct9x support. COD has massive video support with its 1999 Tech3 to spit out those graphics.
Tech5 could spit out what COD can on its own, without ANY video support. Btw "Halo", how does the Bungie engine you play on compare? Right. Learn engines, then games, then come back
lavalois09 9 months ago
@lavalois09 Thank you, you've formulated what I was thinking as well.
88Cortex 9 months ago
looks like they used this to make call of duty black ops
anarchy1090 1 year ago
looks like they used this to make call of duty black ops
anarchy1090 1 year ago
only true nerds will argue which looks better, who gives a shit. as long as its fun and is playable i really don`t care. they all look good so leave it at that.
123MrLap 1 year ago 3
looks like doom3 / quake 4
frankytap 1 year ago
3-4 years later and we have seen just as much of the game
babyturtlex 1 year ago
SoulCube at 2:02!!!!!id software powa!!!!! :D
CSSDEIMOS 2 years ago
It was a shame though that nobody really used the previous Doom 3 engine (id Tech 4) because everyone was using the Unreal Engine. I love the textures and graphics of the Doom 3 engine and so I hope people will start using the id Tech 5 when it comes out.
krisfrosz133 2 years ago
good quality my ass
angryvideogameshad 2 years ago 25
@angryvideogameshad this was pretty good quality 3 years ago when i posted it :)
limpangel 1 year ago 19
@limpangel whats funny is the game still looks this shittey
halo6534 1 year ago
wtf thats steve jobs.
hahaha make games engines on mac but the game is always for pc.
hahahahahahahah
MyMMC 2 years ago
Actually the great thing about this engine is that it apparently gives 60 fps on all major platforms, including mac
sp00ne 2 years ago
lol @ the fps drops
Dohzr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Steve Jobs' a fag.
Unerly 2 years ago
Thats a good looking engine.
komori101 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Nice Video. I really loved your video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed, check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 Channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.
Have A Good one!
Bhoomikadfh 2 years ago
Whats up with the suit, John? This really seems irrelevant to Mac gaming in general, Apple really doesnt give a shit about gaming and it shows, THATS why its still a niche for mac.
noiryork 3 years ago 2
LMAO, Your statement shows what you actually know? :)
Id Software games use OPEN GL
This means that a few Id software games have debuted at MAC world on macintosh FIRST
Doom3 was no different (ID TECH4)
It was debuted on the macintosh at the MAC world show
The Engine was not made on the MAC, but the engine can run on ANY platform without any changes
pc, Mac, xbox ps3.
NO more delays between platforms, same base code running on all platforms
Get it ?
420Scotland 2 years ago
i bet it only work on intel macs too.
deluxedookie 2 years ago
"We wanted to say OK, heres the build and run the same build on the PC, the 360, and the PS3. We still have to go through one extra step to build it on the Mac." - john carmack, shows what you know
buttpwner69 2 years ago 2
holy shit 10 days ?
schoft 3 years ago
i like turtles
kaetzchenderliebe 3 years ago
SO?.
Zoza15 3 years ago
i like turtles
kaetzchenderliebe 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I LIKE TURTLES MORE
Rabarberskurk 3 years ago 2
id software make realy good engines and epic games too. (not for sandbox!!) for sandbox you,ll need to go to the crytekengine 2 or dunia engine for farcrt 2
erikouwehand 3 years ago 6
he just had to fire tim hall...Doom would have really cool...not that it isn't, it's friggin awesome.
ExoKon551 3 years ago
hell yeah! Opengl based! No directxshit 10!
lucifer984 3 years ago 4
thats still a let down with all the good graphics with dx10 shader model 4
rgsgww 3 years ago 4
I'm a PC user myself, but I have used the mac and it is incredibly powerful especially for media creation. I know that this new engine is going to be good because it was developed on the mac, and it would be really neat to see them release Doom4 for the mac, though I will be sure to use it on PC. In short, mac is a fantastic media creation tool, which is why it's so popular these days.
micahmatt 3 years ago
"I know that this new engine is going to be good because it was developed on the mac"
WTF The computer is just a tool to compile the code it could be developed and compiled on a PS3 for anyone cares.
cyborgtroy 3 years ago
It's called hype, it doesn't have to be true.
DILDOlover 3 years ago
My mac is better than yours. It has cheese.
Wait no, CAKE!
PC is better than all.
SolidGoldEliteODST 3 years ago
LOL funny guy!
emons9 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Compare the old Doom 3 tech vid model detail (=polycount) with the model detail in the actual D3 game ... they were a joke compared (Coneheads syndrome).
I'm POSITIVE the same thing will happen here again. Sorry John, but you can't fool me ...
BustyGretchen 3 years ago
John Carmack is the MAN!!!!
DoomMaster55 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think mac will be good for gaming because the hardware is pretty standardized.
I also think gaming will be good for mac!
Elswalbe 3 years ago
Lol. Is "standardized" the new slang word for "shit"?
SlapEveryJew 3 years ago
LOL
disco244 3 years ago
Actually he's right in a way because they could sort out latency in the hardware unlike non-standard PC jumbles. If you're looking for pure gaming it's a better platform. If you're looking for graphical detail and performance then it's not.
ryanmczero 3 years ago
well i can see where mac has good hardware...but you do your research when building a rig...it will be slicker than your mac screen
rgsgww 3 years ago
I'm not a mac fan boy in any way. I don't own one, and I've got a good windows rig. I don't see why the two can't co-exist and I don't really think it's fair to be giving me thumbs down because I said that.
Elswalbe 3 years ago 2
im not giving you any thumbs down at all, i think its great to have both of the systems running together, the mac is a good platform but its hardware isnt all that great
rgsgww 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Macs FTW!
DevilBox083 3 years ago
Macs FTL!
RCCeptor5665 3 years ago 2
Doom 4 Livewire- :p
YUPchannel 3 years ago
again didnt amaze me, pc has the best graphics, and if Steve Jobs lets games on macs, then how would he manage to give updates? i am sure he wont want his users open up the macs, change graphics cards and stuff...
hl2tdm 3 years ago
@1.13 " 20 somewhat GIGABYTES of textures" oO
kneusje0 4 years ago
PC SHALL RULE! ONCE AGAIN! CONSOLES SUCK! PC WILL ALWAYS BE MORE POWERFUL AND TAKE THE BEST GAMING EXPERIENCE EVER! pc............ftw
elementkid177 4 years ago 48
yeah. but without the caps lock.
WillAJD 3 years ago
lol
plok1337 3 years ago
Some games are inherently better on PC (first person shooter for example) and some are just better on consoles ( like racing games & sports games..But sports games are shit anyways)
BrandNameChapstick 3 years ago 4
i kno
rgsgww 3 years ago
@elementkid177 PC never stoped ruling :P
Bariudol 1 year ago
@elementkid177 yeah then how do you explain the pc version of rage having low framerates, bad textures, and bad texture pop-in were the console version doesnt
Thesuperenrique234 4 months ago
haha. he reminds me of rusty gates form the arrow computer ads!
Markin2D 4 years ago
I love Carmack!
yalewhd 4 years ago
Stunning! Absolutely! 'Carmack's a legend [3]'! xD
jcmcgeekster 4 years ago
Carmack's a legend [2]
douglazricardo 4 years ago 3
and how the hell are they gonna adapt this technology to the 360?! Just 20GBs of texture, for one map XD PS3 will prevail. Pretty easy with the Blu-Ray format. But 360's DVDs are gonna have a hard time.
ScarletSnake 4 years ago
Dude, it's called texture compression.
arudson 4 years ago 2
Oh and one other thing... considering the PS3 has about 1/3 of the effective available memory compared to 360, I imagine the PS3 will infact be the biggest source of headaches, relative to the other 3 platforms (PC, Mac, 360).
It's stuff like API/OS, toolchain, available RAM, bandwidth and data transfer latency that cause development headaches -- all of which are the worst on PS3 by a long shot. Not storage media.
arudson 4 years ago
You are all wrong.
The pc will rule once again!
draw123 4 years ago 30
@draw123 With gamepad-adapters so we can play with wii classic controllers, bitches!
tintinytdj 1 year ago
The PS3 won't prevail just because it uses blu-ray. Storage media isn't the issue to porting complicated games to consoles. As a matter of opinion, the 360 and ps3 wont be that much different in the long run. However, graphical power wise, the 360 is better! Textures can be compressed as microsoft's platform has many effective tools. Don't be fooled by all this "PS3 this" nonsense. PC's have the best gear, and wont surpass it!
wrestler50000 4 years ago
Carmack's a legend.
ScarletSnake 4 years ago
wow, i dont knew that there is stevie jobs too :-)
ubuntu704feistyfawn 4 years ago
John Carmack is really really good. =) I didn't quite enjoy the Doom 3 game, but I enjoyed the progress report throughout the construction of the engine. But it should be much better with tech 5's.
theyouth2000 4 years ago
We'd still be using the 'Build' Engine without Johnny:P
levethane 4 years ago
If you look at one of the greatest games of all time they're built on id technology. For instance Half-Life, Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, all id technology as well as the Quake series ... One advantage that we have is that John's code is very clean, very robust, structured well, and seriously, if it wasn't for John Carmack the first-person industry and game industry would look very different so we're very confident with out plans and technology. - TW
cmdreno 4 years ago 4
yea, ur rite, although half life rewrote the quake engine 70%, which means its only 30% quake, thats alot. But john carmack's pretty amazing, although cryengine 2 is still a little better than the id tech 5
rolln2013 4 years ago 2
let there be a doom 4
danthefooman539 4 years ago
lets hope that they dont start a new doom. they're better off with wolfenstein and this.
ScarletSnake 4 years ago
they could bring hell back to earth and have two stories running at once, one for the doom 3 guy and another for the ROE guy
danthefooman539 4 years ago
John Carmack is the man.. 'nuf said.
playwizz 4 years ago