and this attitude also shows in bob barrs lack to more explicitly acknowledge that the neocon faction that hijacked and perverted the republican party, and discarded traditional core republican and constitutional principles and values, does not represent the whole republican party;
and that the true republican majority is represented by constitutional republican candidate for president, RON PAUL.
RON PAUL is more of a candidate than anyone else i see in these elections... what makes you think or pretend that you cannot or should not vote for whoever in your country you think is best qualified, and best represents your own interests - and not for anyone who gets most shoved down your throat, or 'so this other guy will win/ not win', or because he 'will win anyway, so i might as well not look like a loser and pretend i somehow win by voting for whoever's going to win anyway'
(dangerous attitude, as that practically means you'll vote for whoever you're told to vote), or is most corrupt, or can tell the 'best' lies, or is most popular, or got the neatest haircut, or is most funny, or ridiculous, or whatever... in fact, it is your constitutional responsibility to vote ONLY for your conscience, and your own interests (even if it means a write-in vote, and you're the only one to vote for your candidate)
- anything else is suicidal, and is what's killing the constitution, and your liberties, and is really treason to your country. why not check out all the candidates' voting records, their history and lifestyle, and check out whether you find them telling even ONE deliberate lie to your face... that is enough to disqualify ANYONE to run for president. very simple, and very efficient, as it narrows down your choice real quick.
whatever additional qualifications your candidate/s left over might bring to the race, are welcome. not coincidentally, RON PAUL is by all means also the most qualified and competent.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
some nice humor. the one that made me wonder though, is where he said he'd see no problem with the two party system as long as the libertarian party was part of it. this is actually not a very libertarian, nor even constitutional republican attitude. though not even close, it's too much reminiscent of g.w. bush's quipping punchline, 'this would be a whole lot easier if this was a dictatorship - as long as i'm the dictator.'
Irrelevant.
cvig 3 years ago
good stuff
Etrade79 3 years ago
That was actually kind of fun.
inibo 3 years ago
how wasted did he have to get in order to do this?
bsodmyself 3 years ago
he is pretty funny - fo' shizzle
sddallas 3 years ago
1:01, 1:37 sounds like ron paul laughing
DominationCorp 3 years ago
not really
YazDawg 3 years ago
wait omg, i did hear him. nvm.
YazDawg 3 years ago
It does sound like him. Was it?
Antsy 3 years ago
Hey Bob,
You do eat meat, don't you? I'd have trouble relating to a non-meat eater!
I thought it was a pretty good set!
twp0552 3 years ago
wince. If that's his 'funny', I think I prefer his dull.
susanhogarth 3 years ago
I realy like Bob and I though this was funny, but I think the part about Obama was a little inappropriate.
Eternaverse 3 years ago
I think Obama and McCain are both a little inappropriate.
PorkyPants 3 years ago 3
"my mom still thinks i don't eat meat." hilarious.
go bob...i'm way left, but i'd much rather see a libertarian in the oval office than mccain.
meddlecascade 3 years ago 6
How many Libertarians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They sit around and let the Free Market do it.
klaptongroovemaster 3 years ago 5
How many Libertarians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
Well, so far, they're all still trying, but the darn door is locked.
bamboooodmad 3 years ago
Checkout the liberty mustache on that guy!
thedude1104 3 years ago 2
OK, not only is he a rockin' candidate, but he's got a sense of humor.
philosophygeek 3 years ago 4
and this attitude also shows in bob barrs lack to more explicitly acknowledge that the neocon faction that hijacked and perverted the republican party, and discarded traditional core republican and constitutional principles and values, does not represent the whole republican party;
and that the true republican majority is represented by constitutional republican candidate for president, RON PAUL.
cmoleon 3 years ago
Ron Paul isn't a candidate and won't be counted in most states.
thedude1104 3 years ago
RON PAUL is more of a candidate than anyone else i see in these elections... what makes you think or pretend that you cannot or should not vote for whoever in your country you think is best qualified, and best represents your own interests - and not for anyone who gets most shoved down your throat, or 'so this other guy will win/ not win', or because he 'will win anyway, so i might as well not look like a loser and pretend i somehow win by voting for whoever's going to win anyway'
cmoleon 3 years ago
(dangerous attitude, as that practically means you'll vote for whoever you're told to vote), or is most corrupt, or can tell the 'best' lies, or is most popular, or got the neatest haircut, or is most funny, or ridiculous, or whatever... in fact, it is your constitutional responsibility to vote ONLY for your conscience, and your own interests (even if it means a write-in vote, and you're the only one to vote for your candidate)
cmoleon 3 years ago
- anything else is suicidal, and is what's killing the constitution, and your liberties, and is really treason to your country. why not check out all the candidates' voting records, their history and lifestyle, and check out whether you find them telling even ONE deliberate lie to your face... that is enough to disqualify ANYONE to run for president. very simple, and very efficient, as it narrows down your choice real quick.
cmoleon 3 years ago
whatever additional qualifications your candidate/s left over might bring to the race, are welcome. not coincidentally, RON PAUL is by all means also the most qualified and competent.
cmoleon 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
some nice humor. the one that made me wonder though, is where he said he'd see no problem with the two party system as long as the libertarian party was part of it. this is actually not a very libertarian, nor even constitutional republican attitude. though not even close, it's too much reminiscent of g.w. bush's quipping punchline, 'this would be a whole lot easier if this was a dictatorship - as long as i'm the dictator.'
cmoleon 3 years ago
it was a joke dude. chill out.
cgraham1930 3 years ago 6
Awesome.
kiddailey 3 years ago
This is surprisingly good. He was funny.
georgedonnelly 3 years ago 2