@2paclove2 No, Saddam got himself in power in 1968 as the Baath Party leader in and as a leader of Iraq in 1979. And we never helped Saddam in 1991 that's stupid in fact we hated him after he attacked Kuwait in 1990. When Saddam was slaughtering the Kurds and the Shia Muslims rebels after the 1991 Gulf War ceasefire, the U.S. and it's allies established the no-fly zones over Iraq to protect the Kurdish and Shia Muslim population from attacks by the Iraqi aircraft.
@blackjerryboymetal Really?I gave you all of this info and now you have no anwser so you say all muslims must die?I am looney because i want revenge for my people,you are a pathetic bastard with no life.
@blackjerryboymetal Oh lets look who overthrew general Abdull kareem qasem the helper of the poor people the cia,who helped the baathist party to power America,who gave him weapons to kill the kurds America and Europe,who did help saddam stay in power in 1991 America,who starved 500,000 Iraqi kids to death America,do you want me to go on?
@2paclove2 The reason why Saddam was left in power in 1991 because the UN mandates only allowed the liberation of Kuwait, not the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime in Baghdad. Most of our allies agreed that liberating Kuwait was the objective. If we go into Baghdad without a UN mandate, we would lose support. About the sanctions No, It was Saddam that starved his kids to death, Saddam divert his "oil for food" fund off the backs of France, Germany, and Russia leaving millions of Iraqis to die.
the inspectors gave their reports and findings to the Bush admin. who then turned around and reported the OPPOSITE to Congress and America to gain approval for a bogus war. Sure Saddam was evil but using that as an excuse is just that, an excuse. There are plenty of bad leaders, genocide..... but do we attack ? this was an agenda of the Bush admin. long before 9/11 and that too has been proven - tho they will deny that as well. Lie lie and deny... THAT was the Bush admin. Talk about EVIL !!
The United States has extremely hypocritical policies. As a "superpower" US should set an example of what it is to be honest, fair and just. US fails to do so and attempts to hide the dirty little secrets. This two-faced existence is fueling the fire within radical islam and making the US a "supertarget"
This has to be the least biased, most honest and straight forward explanation of the real, true reasons for this war. He was there, he was pressured by his government to not be an observer or an inspector. But as an intelligence gathering tool. There are fools with no human conciense running this planet, not the pu[ppets..all they are interested in is their 5 minutes of glory. Who is running this tool?.
The WMD was found in Iraq war 1 enough anthrax to cover the world saddam stoped them from looking for more so we had Iraq war 2. This time they found nothing but all the Iraq planes and scientists went to live in sieria.
saddam gave them all that they needed.. they just never had the balls to stand up to bush and say IRAQ HAS NOTHING.. u have a point.. why would u trust the UN.. probably because it stands for united nations.. thats suppose to mean sumthing rite?
Actually, it was the Bush administration that encouraged the belief in an Iraqi WMD program. The neocons were so hell-bent on selling this war that they resorted to inventing intelligence. Four years later, with more than 3,500 coalition deaths and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, the public seems to have forgotten why we went to war in the first place. Bush is a dangerous man who threatens our fundamental way of life, and does this all for personal gain.
Saddam did his best to encourage the belief that he had WMD. Until the very end Saddam would not allow the UN to re-inspect properly. I would rather trust W than the UN-- no question.
Saddam did no such thing and in the months leading up to the war, gave the inspection team unfettered access to anything they wanted including the presidential palaces. You trust 'W', why? What exactly has he done to garner so much trust?
" Although Iraq was cooperative on what inspectors called "process"—allowing inspectors access to suspected weapons sites, for example—it was only marginally cooperative in answering the questions surrounding its weapons programs. Unable to resolve its differences with Security Council members who favored strengthening and continuing weapons inspections, the United States abandoned the inspections process and initiated the invasion of Iraq on March 19." Analysis from arms control web site.
No, let me ask YOU why on earth you would choose to trust the UN and a tyrant like Saddam rather than your president. Quit your whining-- the bum's dead now and his evil regime gone forever. If you think that's a BAD thing, you're too screwed up to even argue with.
You stand strong to your point. Admirable but slightly misguided. You seem to be missing the whole point. Your government advocated and created alot of the UN policies. Those who make the law are not above the law. If not, the U.S. stand to lose international support. He is not saying Saddam is innocent but that that it must have followed due process for a more supported and efficient effort.
When we armed them, it was so they could fight against invasion. We didn't want any one nation controlling all of the world's oil. Iran got their fair share of help from us too. We didn't play favorites, just helped keep the balance. And the only crime Bush committed was waiting on the UN. We should have gone in sooner, we could have saved 100's of thousands of innocent civilians' lives.
Scott Ritter is a Great American
ernndogg2000 1 month ago in playlist More videos from rosaryfilms
Bush and his administration are pieces of SHIT
ernndogg2000 1 month ago in playlist More videos from rosaryfilms
@blackjerryboymetal Answer this why did the us let saddam in power and helped him in 1991?
2paclove2 5 months ago
@2paclove2 No, Saddam got himself in power in 1968 as the Baath Party leader in and as a leader of Iraq in 1979. And we never helped Saddam in 1991 that's stupid in fact we hated him after he attacked Kuwait in 1990. When Saddam was slaughtering the Kurds and the Shia Muslims rebels after the 1991 Gulf War ceasefire, the U.S. and it's allies established the no-fly zones over Iraq to protect the Kurdish and Shia Muslim population from attacks by the Iraqi aircraft.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@blackjerryboymetal show us the pic n rep on ur channel
adwnee1 5 months ago
@blackjerryboymetal Really?I gave you all of this info and now you have no anwser so you say all muslims must die?I am looney because i want revenge for my people,you are a pathetic bastard with no life.
2paclove2 6 months ago
@blackjerryboymetal Oh lets look who overthrew general Abdull kareem qasem the helper of the poor people the cia,who helped the baathist party to power America,who gave him weapons to kill the kurds America and Europe,who did help saddam stay in power in 1991 America,who starved 500,000 Iraqi kids to death America,do you want me to go on?
2paclove2 6 months ago
@2paclove2 The reason why Saddam was left in power in 1991 because the UN mandates only allowed the liberation of Kuwait, not the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime in Baghdad. Most of our allies agreed that liberating Kuwait was the objective. If we go into Baghdad without a UN mandate, we would lose support. About the sanctions No, It was Saddam that starved his kids to death, Saddam divert his "oil for food" fund off the backs of France, Germany, and Russia leaving millions of Iraqis to die.
Hperman09 4 months ago
@blackjerryboymetal I am Iraqi and half Kurdish,so yes i knew about the first gulf war which was the Americans plan.
2paclove2 6 months ago
so even if iraq had wmd how could this effect the us what they would send the weapons through mail?
2paclove2 7 months ago
the inspectors gave their reports and findings to the Bush admin. who then turned around and reported the OPPOSITE to Congress and America to gain approval for a bogus war. Sure Saddam was evil but using that as an excuse is just that, an excuse. There are plenty of bad leaders, genocide..... but do we attack ? this was an agenda of the Bush admin. long before 9/11 and that too has been proven - tho they will deny that as well. Lie lie and deny... THAT was the Bush admin. Talk about EVIL !!
gomezfan 1 year ago
The United States has extremely hypocritical policies. As a "superpower" US should set an example of what it is to be honest, fair and just. US fails to do so and attempts to hide the dirty little secrets. This two-faced existence is fueling the fire within radical islam and making the US a "supertarget"
psumper09 2 years ago
This has to be the least biased, most honest and straight forward explanation of the real, true reasons for this war. He was there, he was pressured by his government to not be an observer or an inspector. But as an intelligence gathering tool. There are fools with no human conciense running this planet, not the pu[ppets..all they are interested in is their 5 minutes of glory. Who is running this tool?.
rhetski28 4 years ago
International treaty supercedes the US constitution.
Govt. should be protecting the individuals right to ownership of his life liberty and property.
Not unical's right to oil piplines across afghanistan.
Love Jimmy
coolfoilhatman 4 years ago 2
Terrorists = Founding fathers
United states has WMD's
coolfoilhatman 4 years ago 6
The Iraq war 1 ceasefire agreement that saddam signed was broken each month for 10 years before we went in again.
cgman2 4 years ago
The WMD was found in Iraq war 1 enough anthrax to cover the world saddam stoped them from looking for more so we had Iraq war 2. This time they found nothing but all the Iraq planes and scientists went to live in sieria.
cgman2 4 years ago
learn how to spell!! its Syria!!!
shilinski 4 years ago
saddam gave them all that they needed.. they just never had the balls to stand up to bush and say IRAQ HAS NOTHING.. u have a point.. why would u trust the UN.. probably because it stands for united nations.. thats suppose to mean sumthing rite?
TheIraq 4 years ago
Actually, it was the Bush administration that encouraged the belief in an Iraqi WMD program. The neocons were so hell-bent on selling this war that they resorted to inventing intelligence. Four years later, with more than 3,500 coalition deaths and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, the public seems to have forgotten why we went to war in the first place. Bush is a dangerous man who threatens our fundamental way of life, and does this all for personal gain.
brachj 4 years ago 2
Saddam did his best to encourage the belief that he had WMD. Until the very end Saddam would not allow the UN to re-inspect properly. I would rather trust W than the UN-- no question.
gopman64 4 years ago
Saddam did no such thing and in the months leading up to the war, gave the inspection team unfettered access to anything they wanted including the presidential palaces. You trust 'W', why? What exactly has he done to garner so much trust?
FattKidd 4 years ago
" Although Iraq was cooperative on what inspectors called "process"—allowing inspectors access to suspected weapons sites, for example—it was only marginally cooperative in answering the questions surrounding its weapons programs. Unable to resolve its differences with Security Council members who favored strengthening and continuing weapons inspections, the United States abandoned the inspections process and initiated the invasion of Iraq on March 19." Analysis from arms control web site.
gopman64 4 years ago
No, let me ask YOU why on earth you would choose to trust the UN and a tyrant like Saddam rather than your president. Quit your whining-- the bum's dead now and his evil regime gone forever. If you think that's a BAD thing, you're too screwed up to even argue with.
gopman64 4 years ago
You stand strong to your point. Admirable but slightly misguided. You seem to be missing the whole point. Your government advocated and created alot of the UN policies. Those who make the law are not above the law. If not, the U.S. stand to lose international support. He is not saying Saddam is innocent but that that it must have followed due process for a more supported and efficient effort.
jangove 4 years ago
one day G W (NAZI)BUSH will be tried for war crimes!! The US should know he had weapons WE SOLD THEM TO HIM AND PUT HIM IN POWER
shilinski 4 years ago
When we armed them, it was so they could fight against invasion. We didn't want any one nation controlling all of the world's oil. Iran got their fair share of help from us too. We didn't play favorites, just helped keep the balance. And the only crime Bush committed was waiting on the UN. We should have gone in sooner, we could have saved 100's of thousands of innocent civilians' lives.
CaptAdams35 2 years ago
actually he was playing games. He would take a little and give a little. Scott even talks about this in the video.
groovypucks 4 years ago