sc0pl355. PCs have always been better than Macs. in my other video i open 74 Quick time movies with with full divx and Macward and Eric couldnt open 40 MP4 clips. If you want me to upload that vi dim more happy to do so.
Um, deadrat, we're not even really talking about your video.
Plus, I disagree with the notion that using different software and playing different videos conclusively shows that your AMD processor was what had prevailed in your video.
For starters, VLC is much lighter than Quicktime. Secondly, we don't even know if what Eric showed was his limit. I didn't even see his video. Would have been nice if you linked to it.
Look the guy was running his vids under a single instance of quicktime, while you were running under VLC in multiple instances. IF ANYTHING, the vid is more about how good VLC is, not how good Windows is.
If I make duplicates of VLC, I can run many more videos, smoothly, in each version, than I can in one copy of Quicktime. Multiple instances are like having multiple copies in a way because you can spread the processes out into multiple processes, while QT is one process the way he did it.
Well you can still watch the video can't you? There are more codecs for VLC than for shit time. Emeek could run that many videos on his iMac in VLC I'm sure but it still proves the point that his old PC can do as much as the iMac.
What's he proving here with his shakeycam and preloaded vids? What's he proving by playing vids in multiple instances in VLC when playing the same amount of vids in QT is much more difficult. At best, this vid shows that VLC is a good media player. Problem is, VLC is available for Mac.
Plus, he only shows his CPU. He doesn't show his Videocard or RAM. Both things are more important when it comes to videoplayback.
The clone is unnecessary. the processing power needed to process a clone is negligible. Look, I can clone a vid 50 times with no impact on playback or processing.
Also, I see that your task bar says you have 18 vids open. But you don't you only have 9 vids opened.
Lord of the rings: Two Towers (720 x 304) x 6 with 30 clones each. Each one is opened in its own install of VLC. on top of that, I have two more installs of VLC on standby.
Can do five clones without dropping any frames. 8 with some dropped frames. 10 with more dropped frames. 30 with no locking of my system but a slideshow.
In contrast, I can run three copies (Not clones) of the video in quicktime so far.
Why does it matter if Quicktime is as good as VLC or not?
VLC is available for OSX too. My point is that the other guy ran all his vids IN quicktime. If VLC is better, then you actually didn't prove anything because, by your own words, he ran his vids the hard way.
I said it looks sped up, that's an opinion. Also, I see some of your vids are skipping frames. AND those vids look pretty low res. On top of that, you had those vids pre-opened.
amd forever!!!!!
z60nil 1 year ago
sc0pl355. PCs have always been better than Macs. in my other video i open 74 Quick time movies with with full divx and Macward and Eric couldnt open 40 MP4 clips. If you want me to upload that vi dim more happy to do so.
oOADROo 2 years ago
deadrat, you are notorious for playing a flim-flam game. I've caught you numerous times trying to pull a fast one if you recall.
Don't play that with me, keep that mess to the newbs.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
i dont want to argue But the reality was my AMD did do a better job than Erics iMac
oOADROo 2 years ago
Um, deadrat, we're not even really talking about your video.
Plus, I disagree with the notion that using different software and playing different videos conclusively shows that your AMD processor was what had prevailed in your video.
For starters, VLC is much lighter than Quicktime. Secondly, we don't even know if what Eric showed was his limit. I didn't even see his video. Would have been nice if you linked to it.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Looks sped up
Plus, lol at comparing VLC to Quicktime.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Quick time isent as good as VLC. BTW no speed up in this vid, that AMDC was the best CPU i ever owned and im a Intel fanboy :D
oOADROo 2 years ago
Look the guy was running his vids under a single instance of quicktime, while you were running under VLC in multiple instances. IF ANYTHING, the vid is more about how good VLC is, not how good Windows is.
If I make duplicates of VLC, I can run many more videos, smoothly, in each version, than I can in one copy of Quicktime. Multiple instances are like having multiple copies in a way because you can spread the processes out into multiple processes, while QT is one process the way he did it.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
The point is apple fanboys criticise Windows users constantly, and he can do what a 2 year old iMac with a dual core, on a shitty single core PC.
ljscott1990 2 years ago
how does comparing apples and oranges prove anything?
They both were playing different videos and using different applications with different underlying conditions.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Well you can still watch the video can't you? There are more codecs for VLC than for shit time. Emeek could run that many videos on his iMac in VLC I'm sure but it still proves the point that his old PC can do as much as the iMac.
ljscott1990 2 years ago
Look, I don't care about what you think of Quicktime.
All I'm saying is that Showing a bunch of vids in VLC does nothing to say that a PC is better than a Mac.
VLC is available for OSX.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
the bullshit idiots throw around is that Windows can't multitask. videos like this disprove that notion entirely.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
There's a difference between disproving something and trying to draw a comparison that is off balance.
Like I said, Deadrat has been notorious for gimping his comparisons for years now.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
so? his point gets across, and he's right.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
What's he proving here with his shakeycam and preloaded vids? What's he proving by playing vids in multiple instances in VLC when playing the same amount of vids in QT is much more difficult. At best, this vid shows that VLC is a good media player. Problem is, VLC is available for Mac.
Plus, he only shows his CPU. He doesn't show his Videocard or RAM. Both things are more important when it comes to videoplayback.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
video playback taxes the CPU moreso than memory and GPU.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
snipurl. c o m / sbxfm
whatever
sc0pl355 2 years ago
right, but that's if your media player offloads decoding to the GPU. given the CPU usage in my screenshot, I doubt VLC is doing that.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
Hardware YUV DirectX output. >:(
I smell clone filter
sc0pl355 2 years ago
i38.tinypic com/2uynas8.jpg
nine different videos, each with a clone, is this better?
thebsdguy 2 years ago
The clone is unnecessary. the processing power needed to process a clone is negligible. Look, I can clone a vid 50 times with no impact on playback or processing.
Also, I see that your task bar says you have 18 vids open. But you don't you only have 9 vids opened.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
okay, open up a 720p movie and clone it 50 times.
if you look at the videos, it's 9. 9 are VLC windows, 9 are clones.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
That's what I said, you had 9 videos. The 9 clones don't really count as videos.
Anyway, I opened up Lord of the rings: The two towers
According to Quicktme, which I opened it i to verify the size, the data size on it is 1.41 gb and it is 720 x 304 (720p). I took a screenshot.
After that, I opened it in VLC, made 50 clones and moved them around a bit. It played just fine. A little choppy, but My iMac is old.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
I just did young guns. 711 x 400. Same results. 50 clones able to play.
Yeah, I know it isn't 720p, but it contains more data per frame than the two thrones
sc0pl355 2 years ago
720p is 1280x720, not 720x304.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
My bad, It's after 4:am here.
hold on.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
i35.tinypic com/2uj2vfc.png
it's not 720p or even close, but yeah.
thebsdguy 2 years ago
Alright, got it.
I don't have any 720p vids. So, what I did is opened five movies.
Young guns, scarface, Dead Man's chest, two towers and I-Robot
Young guns is 711 x 400, the other four are 720 x 304. Each has 13 clones.
720 x 304= 218,880 x 4= 875,520
711x400= 284,400
284,400+875,520= 1,159,920 pixels of data.
1280x720= 921,600
still runs
sc0pl355 2 years ago
I opened 6 movies.
Ghost Town = 616x336
Der Untergang = 608x336
Wanted = 668x278
The Man from Earth = 608x352
Total Recall = 608x532
El orfanato = 1008x432
still running :D
thebsdguy 2 years ago
15 clones each btw
thebsdguy 2 years ago
Lord of the rings: Two Towers (720 x 304) x 6 with 30 clones each. Each one is opened in its own install of VLC. on top of that, I have two more installs of VLC on standby.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Make that seven with 30 more clones to add to the pile.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
you need to push it harder, that is pretty weak. download big bunny 1080P and see how many copies you can go without dropping too many frames.
ASCII808 2 years ago
holy shit. big bunny is awezome!!!
I love the animation.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Another one that looks pretty neat, is Elephants Dream. The detail is pretty amazing for a little blender animation.
ASCII808 2 years ago
Yeah, I saw Elephant's dream. Know where I can get a 1080p on that one?
Hey, have you seen Gentleman's Duel? That's a fantastic one. No hd tho as far as I know.
Also, there is a game sprite vid called Kings Of Power 4Billion% you gotta see that one.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Ok, tried out Big Bunny 1080p on my iMac.
Can do five clones without dropping any frames. 8 with some dropped frames. 10 with more dropped frames. 30 with no locking of my system but a slideshow.
In contrast, I can run three copies (Not clones) of the video in quicktime so far.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
and here, i did this with a movie i'm watching:
i37.tinypic com/20q1ah2.jpg
thebsdguy 2 years ago
multiple instances of the same vid in VLC. Not impressed.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Why does it matter if Quicktime is as good as VLC or not?
VLC is available for OSX too. My point is that the other guy ran all his vids IN quicktime. If VLC is better, then you actually didn't prove anything because, by your own words, he ran his vids the hard way.
I said it looks sped up, that's an opinion. Also, I see some of your vids are skipping frames. AND those vids look pretty low res. On top of that, you had those vids pre-opened.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
lol so funny little less than double with 1 core less
UbuntuOwns2228 2 years ago
nice
seansfilms 2 years ago
AMD 3200+ still a great CPU, runs my second PC with Win 7 and 1Gb RAM pretty smooth.
blacksteel25 2 years ago
AMD 3200+ Best CPU i ever owned. It was way fater then all erics iMacs :D
oOADROo 2 years ago
my old desktop still runs amd 3200+ barton, its good for windows xp
NiebaumCurran 2 years ago