Added: 4 years ago
From: Acumensch
Views: 8,215
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • already a hard enough topic to understand without the flange

  • why are you saying that that it is good?

  • veramente un lavoro superlativo

  • Maciunas would be proud!! this is one of the best films I have seen in a long time. I love your work. Please message me... I would love to use this in my visuals and or  do a remix as a homage. Regards Redstar309Z

  • not fluxus.

    is still good.

  • Ottimo

  • well done!

  • Surreal..

    I like it.

  • nice work, like to have your veiws check us out

  • interesting!

  • I don't think your movie is helping though. You see, as good as it is, its nothing more than another spectacle. Which is precisely the reason that Debord didn't let his films get out during his lifetime. You can present a deconstruction with out the deconstruction of your presentation.

  • (can't present)

    sorry it's late over here.

  • Good point - But the terrorism of the spectacle (i.e. the spectacle of terror) is so powerful that you can't counter-act without the use of a counter-acting spectacle. Weren't all the Situationist comic books also self-deconstructing counter-spectacles?

  • True. The spectacle can counter itself. The truth is...it's just plain good to get people thinking about the way they live and the way they experience the world. So, I may just be acting on the fact that I'm so over educated I've lost perspective. In any case, I like the way you think, and I like what you stand for. It's good to have a dialog. I didn't even know about the situationist comic books until you mentioned them. Thanks for being so rad.

  • @Acumensch how is this a self-deconstructing counter-spectacle?

  • I also disagree. We can do more than simply look at this text; we have opportunities for responses (well, short ones, at least).

    Its an open question:

    on one hand, the ways in which our [youtube] responses are formally coded represent the manner in which fragmented elements are continually recouperated into spectacle.

    On the other hand

    there is a real community of people with faith in the limits of deconstruction better termed as detournement, folks who get the joke.

  • Guy Debord would be proud.

    If he hadn't drank himself to death first.

  • Sounds like Youtube itself.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more