the constitution made this country. why people want socialism is beyond me. ron paul knows where we are going. money= debt. take the time to watch. the american dream
Excuse me but I don't see a failure at all, all I see is a man who was presented with a staggeringly stupid question and trying to find the words to deal with such idiocy.
Republicans have made a career demonizing Republicans. You've ruined a once-great party. If it wasn't for Ron Paul I'd have abandoned the GOP a long time ago. Contrary to what you hypocrites thing, big govt isn't only "ok when our guys do it".
I don't love ron paul but I agree with his fiscal analysis. particularly as it applies to the FED. This video shows that the president doesn't have the power to do this directly. An initiative to change the monetary system would have to come from the legislative branch and be signed into law by the president. Which is why i am more focused on the upcoming senate/house elections than I am the presidency. The people need better representation.
@Conservativecavalry I'd imagine you think that printing more money and increasing our national debt is a good idea, huh? You also think that Iran can destroy the entire world with a single nuclear warhead before we turn them into a glass plate? Please explain the "gold bubble" to me. You think that gold will ever decrease in value? It's the only thing that cannot be created in a lab. What we have is what we have. Do you understand supply and demand?
I think we can all agree that Rick Santorum as the GOP nominee would be a disaster; he'd get destroyed by Obama. What can the voters be thinking? You have to be a little pragmatic. Vote for a guy who actually has a chance even if he doesn't share all of your values.
I can give Santorum some credit for not being wishy-washy; he stand for something. However, he has no chance of becoming President.
Ron Paul said that he got in this race because the American people agree with his principles now, but I totally disagree. I mean, let's take a look at the birth control controversy. Most Americans believe that insurance policies should be forced to cover birth control. Ron Paul, as a libertarian, believes that nobody should be forced to do anything. He's out of touch. Most Americans believe in some government regulation.
Obama looks like a two-termer to me. To be honest, I can certainly accept having him as President, except for the fact that he gets to appoint Supreme Court justices. One of the five conservative justices could croak during Obama's next term, and it could change the balance of the court, which will affect issues like guns, affirmative action, speech, etc. That's my fear.
A few months ago, I was certain that Obama was going to be a one-term President, but now I don't know. The economy is doing slightly better, and Obama's numbers are up. He beats Romney in the latest polls. Furthermore, according to Rasmussen, 52% of Americans think that the GOP Congressional agenda is extreme. I'm sorry, but things aren't looking good for the GOP right now.
Why does Ron Paul stutter so much? He doesn't seem to be able to keep his train of thought. Is that common in older folks? I have seen him in other videos and he sometimes loses his train of thought. Why is that? Does that worry you Yanks? I mean look @ Ronald Reagan. He had dementia as a sitting president. Didn't he?
@godfreewoman sorry he isn't a trained actor, hes not speaking from a script with big talking points like the other candidates. His positions are far more complex and sophisticated than the public realizes and you need to know history and have a sense of freedom to hear his message.
Thanks for pointing that out. I meant to say "libertarianism." BTW, how are you taking the fact that Ron Paul has yet to win a single caucus or primary, EVER? Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha! Ron Paul is a joke.
@Edgehead10075 Ron Paul is the leader of a movement. He loses caucuses and primaries because the situation in this country hasn't gotten bad enough for more people to see and take action against the issue of big government and out of control spending and inflation. Throughout history people have generally resisted sudden challenges to the status quo because they are satisfied, until the injusticies become too big of a problem for them to ignore.
Yes, but throughout history the status quo has always been abandoned in favor of something more progressive. Libertarianism is a regressive political ideology. We're never going to move backwards.
@Edgehead10075 i think Ron Paul supporters look at it as opposite. All of this big government and power to the president to invade countries almost at his whim is regressing back to the days of monarchy and facism. forward progress to me is freedom.
Okay, but what about domestic issues, like healthcare? Certainly the libertarian view on healthcare is considered backwards. Progress has always meant the government helping out those who can't take care of themselves.
@Edgehead10075 ever since government has gotten into healthcare, the costs have gone up and the system is ripping off everyone. everyone pays into social security and the value of the dollar is decreasing rapidly over time, leaving us with less buying power. I dont understand how you can talk to 95% of Americans who will say that the government sucks and cant do anything, and yet still think that the government is capable of running markets better than the people!!
The government got into healthcare because it needed to help out people who couldn't afford it. If we go back to a free market system, what will we do about those who can't afford healthcare?
Americans say that the government sucks, but they support Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They'll go nuts if anyone touches those things.
@Edgehead10075 why is it the government's job to help people who cant be responsible for themselves? youre teaching the people to just become dependent on welfare and handouts to achieve success. I have a problem with the government taking my money and giving it to someone else because they were too foolish to take care of themself. People need to be held accountable for their actions. The government cannot protect the people from themselves.
@Edgehead10075 I am one of those people who cant afford healthcare. But i dont believe that I have a right to use other people's money. the reason i cant afford healthcare? government involvement eliminating competition, and a poor legal system. Lots more people could afford healthcare if the government would get out of the way.
Well, I'm guessing that you're NOT irresponsible, which proves my point. Dude, the government has the right to tax the people and spend the money for benevolent purposes; it's not theft. That's what society does.
If the government got out of the way, I'm still sure that some people wouldn't be able to afford healthcare. We need to have some government involvement. I mean, what about children who can't afford healthcare? We can't just let them die.
@Edgehead10075 I am below the federal poverty line first of all. I have insurance now, but I have been sick and/or injured without insurance and NEVER been turned away from the hospital. Libertarians believe the Government should have no say on what you do, as long as it doesn't infringe on anyone's Liberty's!! I guess maybe because im poor i understand basic economics a little better, here's the thing if you have to borrow money to pay your bills, you dont have it to give away!
You've never been turned away? Well, many people are turned away. Also, who pays for it when the hospital agrees to help you, even though you can't pay for it? Libertarians seem to think that doctors should help poor people for free, which is not fair. They deserved to be paid.
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
You made a comment about how supposedly, in the "good ol' days," no child died for lack of healthcare. That's most likely bullshit. In those primitive days, I'm sure that plenty of children, as well as elderly, died for lack of healthcare. That's why we have Medicare and Medicaid.
@Edgehead10075 You really have no clue do you, you just babble. I don't exactly support social security I would rather have all that money they have taken out of my checks so i could save for my retirement myself. im sure i would have done a better job. How do you like the NDAA that passed under Obama's watch, how about SOPA and PIPA that almost did, before congress flip flopped on that one?
How do you know you could have done a better job? What if you invested in a company that went under? Most Americans support Social Security. It was common sense, after the stock market crash. Social Security isn't going anywhere. Ron Paul is just out of touch.
Okay, but what if you lose your retirement savings? The government is going to end up bailing you out anyway because society isn't going to let anyone starve to death. Therefore, we might as well be forced to pay into Social Security.
@Edgehead10075 Socialist healthcare, which is what you are supporting, would make all doctors get paid the same. What drives people is incentives. If everyone makes the same regardless of their performance there is no incentive to perform better. Thats why people who have those systems come here for better treatment. If you are being tried for a murder you didnt commit would you want a lawyer or public defender.
Nope. I'm not advocating socialism or doctors getting paid the same. I'm advocating that everybody have access to healthcare, which is only fair in a civilized society. The doctors would not be employed by the government under such a system that I support. All you're saying is that some people don't deserve healthcare because they can't afford it, which is wrong and stupid.
America is ranked 37th in healthcare, according to the WHO.
@Edgehead10075 No the government would not employ the doctors just control what they pay for each procedure effectively ensuring they all get paid the same. At no point did I ever advocate people be denied healthcare or legal representation for that matter. People who cannot afford health care now have access to medicare. When you go to the Hospital and you dont have healthcare they have paperwork for you to fill out that will assist you in paying your bill based on income.
(Sigh) People who can't afford healthcare can be and are turned down all the time for non-emergency healthcare. That's just wrong. The only way to ensure that they aren't turned down is to have everybody covered. What is wrong with that?
@Edgehead10075 They would still be turned away if it were non-emergency especially with everybody covered. The Hospitals and Doctors office's would be overrun. they are busy now, how busy would they be if everybody could go whenever for whatever.
They wouldn't be turned away. They'd probably just have to wait a little bit. We can try to solve that problem by encouraging more people to become doctors.
Here's the thing, though. You say that, even though we don't have universal healthcare, nobody is turned away. So, if that's true, shouldn't doctors' offices be overrun right now because everybody supposedly gets healthcare?
I certainly don't want to have to wait to receive treatment, but what's worse: people having to wait in line but everybody has healthcare or people don't have to wait in line but some people are turned down because they can't afford healthcare?
I know that people have to wait in line in other countries, but polls show that they're pleased with their healthcare. They'd rather wait than not have healthcare at all.
Having everyone covered doesn't necessarily mean that the goverment would control how much doctors are paid. We can still have private insurance with universal healthcare, and patients have the right to choose what doctors to see, as long as they're in the plan. BTW, under current law, doctors can refuse to treat Medicare and Medicaid patients because of the cheap payouts. There can be universal healthcare without too much government control.
That's good that you don't advocate people being denied care, but people can be denied care under the current system and certainly under a libertarian system that Ron Paul supports.
Some hospitals are charitable, but certainly not all of them.
@Edgehead10075 So then just go to the ones who are! Ron Paul is a Doctor and has himself accepted patients regardless of their ability to pay. The thing is I can tell you are a liberal so we can go back and forth and neither will change the others opinion. I am poor, but not because the government. My life was shaped by my choices, and its MY responsibility to change it or deal with the consequences. there are jobs just have to be willing to accept them if 1s not enough get 2.
I don't consider myself to be a liberal. I support Mitt Romney for President, not Obama.
It's nice that Ron Paul has accepted patients who couldn't pay, but not everyone does. Furthermore, it may be very difficult for the average poor person to find a doctor who accepts poor patients. It would just be simpler to cover everyone, and doctors deserve to be paid for what they do instead of providing healthcare at a loss.
One of Ron Paul's campaign staffers had to go to the hospital and died without any health insurance. It was a public hospital. Guess what? The taxpayers are now stuck with the bill. It would have actually cost the taxpayers less money had that guy been covered. The insurance company would pay instead of the taxpayers.
That's true, but the government would only be paying part of the cost for most of the people not currently covered. Those people would still legally be required to pay some of the cost, so the taxpayers wouldn't be completely covering the bill. Also, preventative care would probably reduce the number of hospital visits.
When you go to the hospital and you fill out the paperwork, who ends up paying for your operation?
All I'm for is everyone having coverage, not for excessive government regulation. I still want as much private control as possible, but I support a public option that would compete with private insurance companies and keep them honest.
It's interesting that you bring up defense attorneys. According to the Constitution, every defendant has the RIGHT to an attorney, whether or not he can afford it. Does that mean we have a socialist legal system?
@Edgehead10075 Do all lawyers get paid the same? Do we have to use the Public Defenders, if we can afford a Lawyer? You want Government run Healthcare right? That is socialized Medicine, where regardless whether or not you can afford one, one will be provided for you. My intent was to compare the quality of representation/care. I would prefer a doctor who has the incentive to do a good job. BTW i can't afford an attorney, but if i had to i would find a way!
Ron Paul 2012! Stop whining about it and just accept that this movement is too big for the Media and the "good ol' boy" politics system to stop!!!! RON PAUL 2012!!!!
I love how he talks truth but scum of the earth American whore trash people don't know shit so whatever their preschool history doesn't mention then they label it false... LOL RETARDS I LOVE SEEING AMERICANS DIE ESPECIALLY TRYING TO FIGHT WARS LOL..
ConservativeCavalry posted this video obviously based on the fox news thumps up and down bar! With absolutely no clue as to what he actually said. Lol, you tube videos need a IQ test filter, gotta pass a IQ test before posting videos...
Ron Paul 2012. All of the other candidates are more of the same crap. Everybody knows that our country has been heading into the septic tank for MANY years, yet so many will still discount one of the only men that has been fighting for our constitutional rights for his entire political career. He should be enjoying his grandchildren right now, yet he feels an obligation to stand up for you, and me, and our children. His message has never changed throughout the years.. Please do some research
@psx57831 Maybe if Obama had focused on jobs right away instead of creating a federally mandated healthcare system that forces people to buy private insurance from corporations the congress and people would not be so divided right now.As president, Obama has to take responsibility for this because his job is to lead all Americans not to appease his base,or even worse his ego,by passing pet programs like Obamacare. He screwed up by not following Clinton's example right from the start.
what ..trust the globalist nazi fascist establishment robots like Gingrich and Romney whos main contributors are Big Energy and Big Banks?Trust Obama, the Father of Lies and Deception?All of them are mealy mouthed,spineless rats who cow-tow to their Corporate, Child-Killing, Small country Bullying Overlords. Ron Paul and Alex stand up to these sycophantic, eugenics loving, constitution hating NON-American psychos.RON PAUL 2012
Ron Paul is a simple minded cunt. Libertarianism is too simple and black and white to apply to the world we live in. I say this as a former STRIDENT libertarian, and former active RP supporter. The guy is bat-shit, folks!
Good economic ideas, but the problem is he doesn't understand selfish bickering between the parties. Divided its obvious congress gets nothing done and some of em don't care about what constitutional they just wanna further one agenda or another. Its not gonna stop no matter how you approach it unless you somehow strip political greed, but no one can do that. Sorry thats the fail in this.
1) Nooo, Republicans never do anything wrong. Who could get anything passed in a Congress as divided as this one?
2) Military budget is not the same as the Defense budget.
3) Capitalism is cyclical and flawed, for all its good points. We never had the depression needed because we simply printed more money and devalued the dollar.
4) Just wait for the college loan bubble. Your Republican "opinion as news" buddies are the real fear-mongers here. The corrupt establishment needs to be dismantled
When everyone laughed at him i wanted to fucking kill someone. and it wasnt a fail, so fucking what he got quiet for a second. he still had an answer to the question, and a GOOD answer at that. I wanna live a full life...i dont want my government to fucking take over. and that is why im voting for liberty this year, im voting for freedom this year, I'm voting for RON PAUL 2012
How can this be a "fail?" He is making the most sense. God, I wish more politicians had as much common sense on monetary policy as Ron Paul has shown in this video
There are hundreds of ideas pitched by presidential candidates very 4 years that in reality have no shot of being passed through a divided congress. Every other politician lies when they are asked that question and tries to convince voters his ideas are plausible. Why is it considered a flaw for Ron Paul to tell the truth when asked that question? aren't honest politicians what everyone claims to want?
p.s. just because something cant get passed doesnt make it any less of a good idea.
I don't see the fail lol. Now you want to see fail look up bush.theres eight years of him looking like a monkey the guy couldnt even form a fucking sentence.
@mikedundee1979 exactly, he looks like a experienced man who doesn't do anything without thinking rationally or thinking of his action's outcome. I think Ron Paul deserves the presidency for his loyalty to the constitution, thinking rationally unlike most presidents and keeping his word. his ideals and stance on all his issues have not changed since he got into politics years ago and he continues to hold his values close. he's the man for the job, not the other republican retards and obama.
Anybody who has a shred of actual conservatism in his own ideology shouldn't even spit in this guy's direction. He should be outed for what he is. A weak kneed craven coward.
"Conservate cavalry"
LOL Right in your worthless pig face.
Conservate calvalry: Charge!...
Retreat retreat! There's opposition. Little baby ascared!
Worthless. Pathetic. A coward. A neck high pile of fresh steaming fermented manure has more potential positive uses.
Aw Bawwww, little idiot can't cut spending because my little congressman won't serve his 10 term Booo HOOO HOOOO.
Little nasty puke supports market interventionism. Yeah you're a good little liberal puke.
How about you just jump off a bridge. You're worthless trash. Have a heart attack and die already, and get out of everyone else's way. You nasty completely worthless fake.
You're a piece of feces. Nasty worthless Judas fake conservative trash.
All these dumbasses getting on wikipedia and marching their "knowledge" onto youtube to trample a very intelligent man. Clearly, the general concensus for we the people is to be ignorant of what freedom is and how to obtain prosperity. stop pulling this neo austrian bullshit out of your ass and go to college.
(prt12) ..United States of America, then keep doing what you're doing and spread the hate around man. But if you want actual change, do some more in depth research as to what you're gonna get when you vote for any other republican or another Obama term. Cuz ill tell you what.. you vote for anyone besides Ron Paul and you're basically voting in favor of all of the aforementioned issues on our plate, and the continuation thereof.
@varoon3 Its my duty. Im glad you have reached further understanding my friend, and the truth can be easily distorted these days. Please reach out to other's who do not understand, and do so in a gentle and easy to understand fashion. Together we can raise awareness and help each other climb out of the situation were in.
(prt11) ..to hate on an idea, philosophy, candidate, economic policy without actually understanding the implications of the entity in its entirety. To put it simply, if you encourage over-extended military intervention resulting in global tension steered at you and your loved ones, enjoy having tens of thousands of debt under your name as a US citizen, want to be spied on and have your privacy taken away by the federal government, and don't agree with or understand the Constitution of the..
(prt10) ..material wealth such as gold, silver, copper, platinum, etc. We would then only have as much money in circulation as we can account for with material wealth. This would prevent banks from loaning money freely with the push of a button, governmental interference with interest rates, and would allow a fair and free market to flourish in such a fashion that would result in tangible profits with no debt attached. Whats frightening to me is people such as yourself, who go out of their way..
(prt9) ..., which is not a United States entity but an independent corporate global bank, with a low interest rate, but an interest rate nonetheless. This basically implies that every dollar in circulation represents debt. To make it simple, i like to use the salt water analogy. When you're thirsty and drink salt water, it makes you more thirsty, so you drink more and the cycle continues until you're dead. This is why he repeats time and again that we need 'sound money', meaning money backed by
(prt8) ..reducing the scope of governmental involvement. Artificially low interest rates due to governmental interference and subsidization of good and services in order to promote sales, or ultimately profit, are part of the scheme which thrives on the illusion of sound economic policy, when in reality, the loans have to be paid off sometime, and they were usually given through means of monetary creation. When the US government wants money, they simply 'get a loan' from the federal reserve..
(prt7) ..natural economics would be put into place and competition amongst companies would result in cheap, high quality goods. Liquidation, or the getting rid of unwanted products/services through natural failure, is a necessary step in the free market competition process, and allows for service ethical and efficient goods and service providers to flourish while unintelligent economically devised strategies fail as they should. 4). Again, when he speaks of the economy, hes geared towards..
(prt6) ..for example, occured, the government dictated the prices of the houses, encouraged companies to open up loans and mortgages that the costumers weren't qualified to handle, and artificially propped up the market temporarily. If they were to step out, let the business crash due to overpriced goods, and basically 'reset' the market (whereas companies would sell cheaper houses to more qualified individuals based on the understanding that the inverse would result in a loss of profit), than..
(prt5) ..diplomatically bright future. Thats just the start though, you claim to understand Austrian economics so how you came to the conclusion that this is his silver bullet regarding economic policy is beyond me. 3). When government steps in and dictates prices, buys unsold assets, and over-regulates any commodity, service, or business whatsoever, its doomed. If competition thrives, and companies who sell faulty goods/unsatisfying services will fail, as they should. When the housing bubble..
(prt4) ..military spending overseas isn't his solution. Its the start. Can you logically explain to me why we have troops in 150 out of the world's 196 countries? We don't belong in many of the places were at, and the bases/military equipment funding cost alot of money. Alot. If we were to bring the troops home from the Constitutionally immoral and illegal wars were tied up in, it would cut billions of hard money we spend, raise morale, and have the world view us as a nation with a potentially..
(prt3) ..simply because they disagree with the political philosophy. Paul is realistic when it comes to the understanding that many people in the Congress, Senate, and White House are lobbied hard and may work to prevent his legislature from getting signed into law, even if he were the president. But you can't deny the republicans lack of 'republican' nature, and they're disgusting voting records the past decade. Look up voting records of republican senators and see for yourself. 2). Cutting..
(prt2) ..a piece of legislation through Congress. Republicans were historically small government politicians, and as of late, those republicans in Congress, the Senate, and the Oval Office have been shameful. They've increased spending with no balanced budget plans to look forward to, increased war efforts and propaganda, voting in favor of the diminishing of civil liberties, and voted in favor of the extension of federal power. Democrats and independents cannot 'throw people out of office'..
(prt1) Sigh, ill address your "description" points one at a time. I respect your opinion, and your right to disagree with the man, but to say hes 'frightening' is simply leading people astray (although from the looks of it, people watching this video are laughing more so than shaking in fear). 1). Ron Paul understands that a president is not a dictator. You can propose legislation, veto legislation you don't agree with, sign approved legislation into law, and that's it. You cannot force..
we should ALL write in Ron Paul if he doesnt get nominated....can you imagine how the elite and the media will be FORCED to respond if someone who's not even a candidate WINS the popular vote???
Ron Paul is not being mentioned on the media and they are setting him up to seem as a crazy lunatic... but thats only because the fucking media is own by the fucking system! SNAP OUT OF IT PEOPLE! Ron Paul knows what's up and we should have great respect form him because he knows what he is up against and still faces it. want a hint? illuminati,freemasons,skulls&bones,(i dont wanna go there but..)9.11, its all a fucking lie people.
@ConservativeCavalry I love how you and so many other people still don't understand what America needs. Go ahead, make these videos. Ron Paul supporters will overwhelm your asses! RP 2012! Good day sir.
@ConservativeCavalry How many primaries have there been?Oh yeah, just three-and the only reason why he isn't winning is because neoconservative voters like you haven't woken up yet.The only candidate who understands the debt problem is Paul;other candidates (I'm assuming you like Gingrich/Santorum) are planning to increase the debt by policing the world and creating gov't interventions to our personal lives-a DIRECT violation of the Constitution.The Founding Fathers would agree with Ron Paul!
@ConservativeCavalry well there is no consistency in whos winning... so whats your point you rather anyone else then him to win? you'll take someone who made billions destroying companies, or someone who made millions "consulting/lobbying and left one wife because she was dying cheated on the other and is on his 3rd, or the other guy who like the others wants to wage war in every country that may not like the united states...
@ConservativeCavalry How many primaries have you won? Come in second? Finished dead last? Are you running for US President? No? Then shut the fuck up traitor!
@ConservativeCavalry your video has 32 likes and 700 dislikes, Ronald Reagan took 3 tries to become president, the first three primaries mean absolutely nothing, Just give it 4 months and your probably going to have 32 likes and 15,000 dislikes
@ConservativeCavalry look at the like/dislike bar. that's one way they're overwhelming. and the reason why he hasn't been winning the primaries and all that is because the mainstream media is inoring him, and not spreading his mesage to the people.
@ConservativeCavalry And how often do you see Dr. Paul even mentioned on the mainstream media? Even when he was winning or in second, they completely ignored him and talked about who was in third or fourth.
@ConservativeCavalry just goes to show how stupid people are. The only people really against him are the big people with all the money and power which are the people that he hurts. And people are too stupid, so when one of the big guys say ron paul sucks; only mitt can be obama, all the sheeple gather together and obediently listen to orders.
I gotta love this bullshit that Ron Paul is against the "big people" and is for the "little guy." Is that why he opposes having the government help the poor have access to healthcare? Is that why he opposes any and all worker regulations, including the minimum wage? If he's for helping the little guy who's being shit on by the man, why does he oppose the Civil Rights Act? You Paultards are such fucking morons.
I'm not sure what you were thinking when you put this video up; Ron Paul makes a good argument, then the moderator brings up the challenge of a divided Congress. Every President has to deal with Congress. We elect a President to execute his duties, not Congress'. The Executive Branch submits the majority of bills to Congress, and I'd much rather have Ron Paul's people submitting stuff than somebody else. I think Ron Paul can bring Congress together better than any of these other guys.
most republicans and democrats, demonize themselves. Except for Ron Paul. I hope he finds the faults of all these disgusting politicians. And all you people who disagree with him, well, have fun being the cause of our country's destruction and collapse. I have to wake up everyday and deal with all these moron people who only care about their selves. Dont people like this uploader just make you want to puke. I know i do. Just disgusting human behavior
@conservativecalvary it would be less biased if you would allow the applause to sound at the end, that's all i was trying to say. Nothing more. We done here?
I got the dislikes to 600!!!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!! And I am your Neighbor to the north! If he gets in relations between USA and Canada will grow so much.
597 DISlikes. 27 likes. Take a hike idiot. Your points are baseless and you are a fool...or paid...to not support the only honest man running for President.
Here's a basic fact for you. The economy is not supposed to be based on the money in your wallet but on production and substance. The value of the computer I'm using is about it's performance, durability and perhaps appearance, NOT BY HOW MUCH IT COST! We don't need a central bank, it creates false prosperity and problems with our economy. So far now we are not a nation of production, more a nation of consuming.
the constitution made this country. why people want socialism is beyond me. ron paul knows where we are going. money= debt. take the time to watch. the american dream
goodtimes396 12 hours ago
Your name should be Neo-ConservativeCavalry....
gjbarron41 2 days ago
the thumbs up/down chart really helped me follow his arguments. thank you fox news
thenenini 2 days ago
This must be from a Romney supporter.......
friedchicken187 3 days ago
Excuse me but I don't see a failure at all, all I see is a man who was presented with a staggeringly stupid question and trying to find the words to deal with such idiocy.
Asegai666 4 days ago 4
Ummm. I should report this for a misleading title.
AtomicHoosier 5 days ago
Ron Paul 2012!
medicinalfade 1 week ago
Republicans have made a career demonizing Republicans. You've ruined a once-great party. If it wasn't for Ron Paul I'd have abandoned the GOP a long time ago. Contrary to what you hypocrites thing, big govt isn't only "ok when our guys do it".
JLVA1983 1 week ago
Where does the complete failure occur?
ramuhkc 1 week ago
I don't love ron paul but I agree with his fiscal analysis. particularly as it applies to the FED. This video shows that the president doesn't have the power to do this directly. An initiative to change the monetary system would have to come from the legislative branch and be signed into law by the president. Which is why i am more focused on the upcoming senate/house elections than I am the presidency. The people need better representation.
mcjny007 1 week ago
@Conservativecavalry I'd imagine you think that printing more money and increasing our national debt is a good idea, huh? You also think that Iran can destroy the entire world with a single nuclear warhead before we turn them into a glass plate? Please explain the "gold bubble" to me. You think that gold will ever decrease in value? It's the only thing that cannot be created in a lab. What we have is what we have. Do you understand supply and demand?
Rewster86 1 week ago
Since when did pausing for 2 1/12 seconds constitute "Freezing up"? Whatever. Grasping at straws, are we?
schancac 2 weeks ago
FAIL
obcmark 2 weeks ago
I think we can all agree that Rick Santorum as the GOP nominee would be a disaster; he'd get destroyed by Obama. What can the voters be thinking? You have to be a little pragmatic. Vote for a guy who actually has a chance even if he doesn't share all of your values.
I can give Santorum some credit for not being wishy-washy; he stand for something. However, he has no chance of becoming President.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
He was thinking, maybe you should too.
guitarman0731 2 weeks ago
Ron Paul said that he got in this race because the American people agree with his principles now, but I totally disagree. I mean, let's take a look at the birth control controversy. Most Americans believe that insurance policies should be forced to cover birth control. Ron Paul, as a libertarian, believes that nobody should be forced to do anything. He's out of touch. Most Americans believe in some government regulation.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hip hop rap track for Ron Paul
watch?v=L9BtXMy-En0&list=PLA4C5356ECE58C4B9&index=1&feature=pl
Pls like/dislike , your opinion matters !
When in history has the world been 'crazy' for a 75 yr old leader's message?
♥ Ron Paul ♥ 2012 or go to hell
ashwadhwani 2 weeks ago
He has no chance in hell.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 Well it aint 'hell' yet ;)
ashwadhwani 2 weeks ago
Other than that, nothing much will get done during a second Obama term because of gridlock in Congress.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
Obama looks like a two-termer to me. To be honest, I can certainly accept having him as President, except for the fact that he gets to appoint Supreme Court justices. One of the five conservative justices could croak during Obama's next term, and it could change the balance of the court, which will affect issues like guns, affirmative action, speech, etc. That's my fear.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
A few months ago, I was certain that Obama was going to be a one-term President, but now I don't know. The economy is doing slightly better, and Obama's numbers are up. He beats Romney in the latest polls. Furthermore, according to Rasmussen, 52% of Americans think that the GOP Congressional agenda is extreme. I'm sorry, but things aren't looking good for the GOP right now.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
Why does Ron Paul stutter so much? He doesn't seem to be able to keep his train of thought. Is that common in older folks? I have seen him in other videos and he sometimes loses his train of thought. Why is that? Does that worry you Yanks? I mean look @ Ronald Reagan. He had dementia as a sitting president. Didn't he?
godfreewoman 3 weeks ago
@godfreewoman sorry he isn't a trained actor, hes not speaking from a script with big talking points like the other candidates. His positions are far more complex and sophisticated than the public realizes and you need to know history and have a sense of freedom to hear his message.
jjdea07 2 weeks ago
Ron Paul 2012!!
bradlom80 3 weeks ago
Libertarianism, which is supported by selfish and greedy assholes, is nothing more than a joke.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 your english is a joke supported by an ignorant loooooser!!!
jjdea07 3 weeks ago
Thanks for pointing that out. I meant to say "libertarianism." BTW, how are you taking the fact that Ron Paul has yet to win a single caucus or primary, EVER? Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha! Ron Paul is a joke.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 Ron Paul is the leader of a movement. He loses caucuses and primaries because the situation in this country hasn't gotten bad enough for more people to see and take action against the issue of big government and out of control spending and inflation. Throughout history people have generally resisted sudden challenges to the status quo because they are satisfied, until the injusticies become too big of a problem for them to ignore.
jjdea07 3 weeks ago
Yes, but throughout history the status quo has always been abandoned in favor of something more progressive. Libertarianism is a regressive political ideology. We're never going to move backwards.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 i think Ron Paul supporters look at it as opposite. All of this big government and power to the president to invade countries almost at his whim is regressing back to the days of monarchy and facism. forward progress to me is freedom.
jjdea07 3 weeks ago
Okay, but what about domestic issues, like healthcare? Certainly the libertarian view on healthcare is considered backwards. Progress has always meant the government helping out those who can't take care of themselves.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 ever since government has gotten into healthcare, the costs have gone up and the system is ripping off everyone. everyone pays into social security and the value of the dollar is decreasing rapidly over time, leaving us with less buying power. I dont understand how you can talk to 95% of Americans who will say that the government sucks and cant do anything, and yet still think that the government is capable of running markets better than the people!!
jjdea07 2 weeks ago
The government got into healthcare because it needed to help out people who couldn't afford it. If we go back to a free market system, what will we do about those who can't afford healthcare?
Americans say that the government sucks, but they support Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They'll go nuts if anyone touches those things.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 why is it the government's job to help people who cant be responsible for themselves? youre teaching the people to just become dependent on welfare and handouts to achieve success. I have a problem with the government taking my money and giving it to someone else because they were too foolish to take care of themself. People need to be held accountable for their actions. The government cannot protect the people from themselves.
jjdea07 2 weeks ago
How do you know that everyone who can't afford healthcare is irresponsible? There are people who work who can't afford healthcare.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 I am one of those people who cant afford healthcare. But i dont believe that I have a right to use other people's money. the reason i cant afford healthcare? government involvement eliminating competition, and a poor legal system. Lots more people could afford healthcare if the government would get out of the way.
jjdea07 2 weeks ago
Well, I'm guessing that you're NOT irresponsible, which proves my point. Dude, the government has the right to tax the people and spend the money for benevolent purposes; it's not theft. That's what society does.
If the government got out of the way, I'm still sure that some people wouldn't be able to afford healthcare. We need to have some government involvement. I mean, what about children who can't afford healthcare? We can't just let them die.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 I am below the federal poverty line first of all. I have insurance now, but I have been sick and/or injured without insurance and NEVER been turned away from the hospital. Libertarians believe the Government should have no say on what you do, as long as it doesn't infringe on anyone's Liberty's!! I guess maybe because im poor i understand basic economics a little better, here's the thing if you have to borrow money to pay your bills, you dont have it to give away!
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
You've never been turned away? Well, many people are turned away. Also, who pays for it when the hospital agrees to help you, even though you can't pay for it? Libertarians seem to think that doctors should help poor people for free, which is not fair. They deserved to be paid.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In all other industrialized nations, everybody has health coverage. Even Republicans, with the exception of guys like Ron Paul, believe that the government should do something to help those who are currently uninsured. It's called compassion, not socialism. Seriously, what's so wrong about everybody being covered? I don't get you libertarians.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
I wish you well. Honestly, I hope that you don't get sick, since you say that you don't have health insurance.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
You made a comment about how supposedly, in the "good ol' days," no child died for lack of healthcare. That's most likely bullshit. In those primitive days, I'm sure that plenty of children, as well as elderly, died for lack of healthcare. That's why we have Medicare and Medicaid.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Edgehead10075 You really have no clue do you, you just babble. I don't exactly support social security I would rather have all that money they have taken out of my checks so i could save for my retirement myself. im sure i would have done a better job. How do you like the NDAA that passed under Obama's watch, how about SOPA and PIPA that almost did, before congress flip flopped on that one?
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
How do you know you could have done a better job? What if you invested in a company that went under? Most Americans support Social Security. It was common sense, after the stock market crash. Social Security isn't going anywhere. Ron Paul is just out of touch.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 Maybe I couldn't have but the thing is it should be my right and responsibility to do so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
Okay, but what if you lose your retirement savings? The government is going to end up bailing you out anyway because society isn't going to let anyone starve to death. Therefore, we might as well be forced to pay into Social Security.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 Socialist healthcare, which is what you are supporting, would make all doctors get paid the same. What drives people is incentives. If everyone makes the same regardless of their performance there is no incentive to perform better. Thats why people who have those systems come here for better treatment. If you are being tried for a murder you didnt commit would you want a lawyer or public defender.
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
Nope. I'm not advocating socialism or doctors getting paid the same. I'm advocating that everybody have access to healthcare, which is only fair in a civilized society. The doctors would not be employed by the government under such a system that I support. All you're saying is that some people don't deserve healthcare because they can't afford it, which is wrong and stupid.
America is ranked 37th in healthcare, according to the WHO.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 No the government would not employ the doctors just control what they pay for each procedure effectively ensuring they all get paid the same. At no point did I ever advocate people be denied healthcare or legal representation for that matter. People who cannot afford health care now have access to medicare. When you go to the Hospital and you dont have healthcare they have paperwork for you to fill out that will assist you in paying your bill based on income.
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
(Sigh) People who can't afford healthcare can be and are turned down all the time for non-emergency healthcare. That's just wrong. The only way to ensure that they aren't turned down is to have everybody covered. What is wrong with that?
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 They would still be turned away if it were non-emergency especially with everybody covered. The Hospitals and Doctors office's would be overrun. they are busy now, how busy would they be if everybody could go whenever for whatever.
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
They wouldn't be turned away. They'd probably just have to wait a little bit. We can try to solve that problem by encouraging more people to become doctors.
Here's the thing, though. You say that, even though we don't have universal healthcare, nobody is turned away. So, if that's true, shouldn't doctors' offices be overrun right now because everybody supposedly gets healthcare?
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
I certainly don't want to have to wait to receive treatment, but what's worse: people having to wait in line but everybody has healthcare or people don't have to wait in line but some people are turned down because they can't afford healthcare?
I know that people have to wait in line in other countries, but polls show that they're pleased with their healthcare. They'd rather wait than not have healthcare at all.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
Having everyone covered doesn't necessarily mean that the goverment would control how much doctors are paid. We can still have private insurance with universal healthcare, and patients have the right to choose what doctors to see, as long as they're in the plan. BTW, under current law, doctors can refuse to treat Medicare and Medicaid patients because of the cheap payouts. There can be universal healthcare without too much government control.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
That's good that you don't advocate people being denied care, but people can be denied care under the current system and certainly under a libertarian system that Ron Paul supports.
Some hospitals are charitable, but certainly not all of them.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 So then just go to the ones who are! Ron Paul is a Doctor and has himself accepted patients regardless of their ability to pay. The thing is I can tell you are a liberal so we can go back and forth and neither will change the others opinion. I am poor, but not because the government. My life was shaped by my choices, and its MY responsibility to change it or deal with the consequences. there are jobs just have to be willing to accept them if 1s not enough get 2.
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
I don't consider myself to be a liberal. I support Mitt Romney for President, not Obama.
It's nice that Ron Paul has accepted patients who couldn't pay, but not everyone does. Furthermore, it may be very difficult for the average poor person to find a doctor who accepts poor patients. It would just be simpler to cover everyone, and doctors deserve to be paid for what they do instead of providing healthcare at a loss.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
I agree with you that, if a person is able to work, he should be trying to find work. I'm against lazy people just as much as you are.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
One of Ron Paul's campaign staffers had to go to the hospital and died without any health insurance. It was a public hospital. Guess what? The taxpayers are now stuck with the bill. It would have actually cost the taxpayers less money had that guy been covered. The insurance company would pay instead of the taxpayers.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 The taxpayers would be paying the premiums for the insurance, and around and around we go.
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
That's true, but the government would only be paying part of the cost for most of the people not currently covered. Those people would still legally be required to pay some of the cost, so the taxpayers wouldn't be completely covering the bill. Also, preventative care would probably reduce the number of hospital visits.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
When you go to the hospital and you fill out the paperwork, who ends up paying for your operation?
All I'm for is everyone having coverage, not for excessive government regulation. I still want as much private control as possible, but I support a public option that would compete with private insurance companies and keep them honest.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
It's interesting that you bring up defense attorneys. According to the Constitution, every defendant has the RIGHT to an attorney, whether or not he can afford it. Does that mean we have a socialist legal system?
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@Edgehead10075 Do all lawyers get paid the same? Do we have to use the Public Defenders, if we can afford a Lawyer? You want Government run Healthcare right? That is socialized Medicine, where regardless whether or not you can afford one, one will be provided for you. My intent was to compare the quality of representation/care. I would prefer a doctor who has the incentive to do a good job. BTW i can't afford an attorney, but if i had to i would find a way!
johnnyritchie 2 weeks ago
I don't think what I want is government-run healthcare. I just want everyone to have health insurance. I support the existence of private insurance.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
I can't see us moving back to a social Darwinist healthcare system.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul will be forgotten once his pathetic, failed attempt at the White House comes to an end. He belongs in the trashbin of history.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul 2012! Stop whining about it and just accept that this movement is too big for the Media and the "good ol' boy" politics system to stop!!!! RON PAUL 2012!!!!
zachweissproductions 3 weeks ago
I love how he talks truth but scum of the earth American whore trash people don't know shit so whatever their preschool history doesn't mention then they label it false... LOL RETARDS I LOVE SEEING AMERICANS DIE ESPECIALLY TRYING TO FIGHT WARS LOL..
Thejeter5770 3 weeks ago
This is considered stupidity? No wonder our country is so fucked...
aggiefitz 3 weeks ago
"When your bankrupt you cant keep spending" -RP. Something no other runner understands.
thegusbus1001 3 weeks ago 11
ConservativeCavalry posted this video obviously based on the fox news thumps up and down bar! With absolutely no clue as to what he actually said. Lol, you tube videos need a IQ test filter, gotta pass a IQ test before posting videos...
TheTrueJBV3737 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul 2012. All of the other candidates are more of the same crap. Everybody knows that our country has been heading into the septic tank for MANY years, yet so many will still discount one of the only men that has been fighting for our constitutional rights for his entire political career. He should be enjoying his grandchildren right now, yet he feels an obligation to stand up for you, and me, and our children. His message has never changed throughout the years.. Please do some research
whogivesashit9idunno 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul is finished.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
Only failure here is the video title, schmuck. Ron Paul owned you in a video you posted willingly. Idiot. RP2012!
dpawl31 3 weeks ago 30
Ron Paul has no chance of winning. Get over it.
Edgehead10075 2 weeks ago
@dpawl31 good luck ron paul isn't going to win.
AmazingKidable 1 week ago
@ConservativeCalvary....How would you get a bill passed through a deeply divided Congress if you were president?
psx57831 4 weeks ago
@psx57831 Maybe if Obama had focused on jobs right away instead of creating a federally mandated healthcare system that forces people to buy private insurance from corporations the congress and people would not be so divided right now.As president, Obama has to take responsibility for this because his job is to lead all Americans not to appease his base,or even worse his ego,by passing pet programs like Obamacare. He screwed up by not following Clinton's example right from the start.
MacksPower75 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012 REVOLUTION REACHES THE SHORES OF INDIA via hiphop :)
/watch?v=L9BtXMy-En0&list=PLA4C5356ECE58C4B9&index=1&feature=plcp
mild meaningful profanity, final version soon
ashwadhwani 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what ..trust the globalist nazi fascist establishment robots like Gingrich and Romney whos main contributors are Big Energy and Big Banks?Trust Obama, the Father of Lies and Deception?All of them are mealy mouthed,spineless rats who cow-tow to their Corporate, Child-Killing, Small country Bullying Overlords. Ron Paul and Alex stand up to these sycophantic, eugenics loving, constitution hating NON-American psychos.RON PAUL 2012
justout75 4 weeks ago
Ron Paul is a simple minded cunt. Libertarianism is too simple and black and white to apply to the world we live in. I say this as a former STRIDENT libertarian, and former active RP supporter. The guy is bat-shit, folks!
Buddy Roehmer 2012!
Beannaich 4 weeks ago
Good economic ideas, but the problem is he doesn't understand selfish bickering between the parties. Divided its obvious congress gets nothing done and some of em don't care about what constitutional they just wanna further one agenda or another. Its not gonna stop no matter how you approach it unless you somehow strip political greed, but no one can do that. Sorry thats the fail in this.
101Snipeshot 4 weeks ago
Ron Paul 2012!
FilmEastCoast 1 month ago
So uh..where's the fail??
theczarofnorwalk562 1 month ago
1) Nooo, Republicans never do anything wrong. Who could get anything passed in a Congress as divided as this one?
2) Military budget is not the same as the Defense budget.
3) Capitalism is cyclical and flawed, for all its good points. We never had the depression needed because we simply printed more money and devalued the dollar.
4) Just wait for the college loan bubble. Your Republican "opinion as news" buddies are the real fear-mongers here. The corrupt establishment needs to be dismantled
dropintospace 1 month ago
When everyone laughed at him i wanted to fucking kill someone. and it wasnt a fail, so fucking what he got quiet for a second. he still had an answer to the question, and a GOOD answer at that. I wanna live a full life...i dont want my government to fucking take over. and that is why im voting for liberty this year, im voting for freedom this year, I'm voting for RON PAUL 2012
tokeitup420style 1 month ago
How can this be a "fail?" He is making the most sense. God, I wish more politicians had as much common sense on monetary policy as Ron Paul has shown in this video
pennstatefan 1 month ago
There are hundreds of ideas pitched by presidential candidates very 4 years that in reality have no shot of being passed through a divided congress. Every other politician lies when they are asked that question and tries to convince voters his ideas are plausible. Why is it considered a flaw for Ron Paul to tell the truth when asked that question? aren't honest politicians what everyone claims to want?
p.s. just because something cant get passed doesnt make it any less of a good idea.
JayhawkBenja 1 month ago
Pull your head out of the matrix flouride head!!!
breathafreshair108 1 month ago
The title of this video is misleading...
JoobyFoo 1 month ago
I don't see the fail lol. Now you want to see fail look up bush.theres eight years of him looking like a monkey the guy couldnt even form a fucking sentence.
seatown2000 1 month ago
You're a failure, as an American, and as a human being. Time to wake up, buddy.
jgonzalezsolorio 1 month ago
I can't find the "complete failure" part in this video. This was just Ron Paul's flawless logic as always ;)
frobank 1 month ago
Good...Ron Paul is out of the race...Only the repuplican clowns left. Obama is going to get re-elected HAHAHAHAHAHA The republican fails again :P
mikedundee1979 1 month ago
ron pauls foreign policy is enough to categorize him as an outfight failure. kudos
freedomrace1 1 month ago
How is this a fail? I hate stupidity.
MistaMayotte 1 month ago
how is this a failure? I think he picked himself up, made a valid point and finished his answer.
you're a failure for not noticing this you moron.
flamedrag18 1 month ago
@flamedrag18 he actually took a second to think at one point....which most republicans fail to do.
mikedundee1979 1 month ago
@mikedundee1979 exactly, he looks like a experienced man who doesn't do anything without thinking rationally or thinking of his action's outcome. I think Ron Paul deserves the presidency for his loyalty to the constitution, thinking rationally unlike most presidents and keeping his word. his ideals and stance on all his issues have not changed since he got into politics years ago and he continues to hold his values close. he's the man for the job, not the other republican retards and obama.
flamedrag18 1 month ago
Anybody who has a shred of actual conservatism in his own ideology shouldn't even spit in this guy's direction. He should be outed for what he is. A weak kneed craven coward.
"Conservate cavalry"
LOL Right in your worthless pig face.
Conservate calvalry: Charge!...
Retreat retreat! There's opposition. Little baby ascared!
Worthless. Pathetic. A coward. A neck high pile of fresh steaming fermented manure has more potential positive uses.
This guy's a useless fairweather weakling.
Premier112 1 month ago
Look at this worthless excuse maker whine.
Aw Bawwww, little idiot can't cut spending because my little congressman won't serve his 10 term Booo HOOO HOOOO.
Little nasty puke supports market interventionism. Yeah you're a good little liberal puke.
How about you just jump off a bridge. You're worthless trash. Have a heart attack and die already, and get out of everyone else's way. You nasty completely worthless fake.
You're a piece of feces. Nasty worthless Judas fake conservative trash.
Premier112 1 month ago
Seems to me he had a knock out punch. Give that question to the others and see what they say?
jboosa 1 month ago
All these dumbasses getting on wikipedia and marching their "knowledge" onto youtube to trample a very intelligent man. Clearly, the general concensus for we the people is to be ignorant of what freedom is and how to obtain prosperity. stop pulling this neo austrian bullshit out of your ass and go to college.
GanjaVitisMan 1 month ago
our country is flat broke busted...do you not understand that?
ac4108 1 month ago
(prt12) ..United States of America, then keep doing what you're doing and spread the hate around man. But if you want actual change, do some more in depth research as to what you're gonna get when you vote for any other republican or another Obama term. Cuz ill tell you what.. you vote for anyone besides Ron Paul and you're basically voting in favor of all of the aforementioned issues on our plate, and the continuation thereof.
aheadatime 1 month ago
@aheadatime Your response helped me understand Ron Paul's ideas much better than before, Thank you.
varoon3 1 month ago
@varoon3 Its my duty. Im glad you have reached further understanding my friend, and the truth can be easily distorted these days. Please reach out to other's who do not understand, and do so in a gentle and easy to understand fashion. Together we can raise awareness and help each other climb out of the situation were in.
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt11) ..to hate on an idea, philosophy, candidate, economic policy without actually understanding the implications of the entity in its entirety. To put it simply, if you encourage over-extended military intervention resulting in global tension steered at you and your loved ones, enjoy having tens of thousands of debt under your name as a US citizen, want to be spied on and have your privacy taken away by the federal government, and don't agree with or understand the Constitution of the..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt10) ..material wealth such as gold, silver, copper, platinum, etc. We would then only have as much money in circulation as we can account for with material wealth. This would prevent banks from loaning money freely with the push of a button, governmental interference with interest rates, and would allow a fair and free market to flourish in such a fashion that would result in tangible profits with no debt attached. Whats frightening to me is people such as yourself, who go out of their way..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt9) ..., which is not a United States entity but an independent corporate global bank, with a low interest rate, but an interest rate nonetheless. This basically implies that every dollar in circulation represents debt. To make it simple, i like to use the salt water analogy. When you're thirsty and drink salt water, it makes you more thirsty, so you drink more and the cycle continues until you're dead. This is why he repeats time and again that we need 'sound money', meaning money backed by
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt8) ..reducing the scope of governmental involvement. Artificially low interest rates due to governmental interference and subsidization of good and services in order to promote sales, or ultimately profit, are part of the scheme which thrives on the illusion of sound economic policy, when in reality, the loans have to be paid off sometime, and they were usually given through means of monetary creation. When the US government wants money, they simply 'get a loan' from the federal reserve..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt7) ..natural economics would be put into place and competition amongst companies would result in cheap, high quality goods. Liquidation, or the getting rid of unwanted products/services through natural failure, is a necessary step in the free market competition process, and allows for service ethical and efficient goods and service providers to flourish while unintelligent economically devised strategies fail as they should. 4). Again, when he speaks of the economy, hes geared towards..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt6) ..for example, occured, the government dictated the prices of the houses, encouraged companies to open up loans and mortgages that the costumers weren't qualified to handle, and artificially propped up the market temporarily. If they were to step out, let the business crash due to overpriced goods, and basically 'reset' the market (whereas companies would sell cheaper houses to more qualified individuals based on the understanding that the inverse would result in a loss of profit), than..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt5) ..diplomatically bright future. Thats just the start though, you claim to understand Austrian economics so how you came to the conclusion that this is his silver bullet regarding economic policy is beyond me. 3). When government steps in and dictates prices, buys unsold assets, and over-regulates any commodity, service, or business whatsoever, its doomed. If competition thrives, and companies who sell faulty goods/unsatisfying services will fail, as they should. When the housing bubble..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt4) ..military spending overseas isn't his solution. Its the start. Can you logically explain to me why we have troops in 150 out of the world's 196 countries? We don't belong in many of the places were at, and the bases/military equipment funding cost alot of money. Alot. If we were to bring the troops home from the Constitutionally immoral and illegal wars were tied up in, it would cut billions of hard money we spend, raise morale, and have the world view us as a nation with a potentially..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt3) ..simply because they disagree with the political philosophy. Paul is realistic when it comes to the understanding that many people in the Congress, Senate, and White House are lobbied hard and may work to prevent his legislature from getting signed into law, even if he were the president. But you can't deny the republicans lack of 'republican' nature, and they're disgusting voting records the past decade. Look up voting records of republican senators and see for yourself. 2). Cutting..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt2) ..a piece of legislation through Congress. Republicans were historically small government politicians, and as of late, those republicans in Congress, the Senate, and the Oval Office have been shameful. They've increased spending with no balanced budget plans to look forward to, increased war efforts and propaganda, voting in favor of the diminishing of civil liberties, and voted in favor of the extension of federal power. Democrats and independents cannot 'throw people out of office'..
aheadatime 1 month ago
(prt1) Sigh, ill address your "description" points one at a time. I respect your opinion, and your right to disagree with the man, but to say hes 'frightening' is simply leading people astray (although from the looks of it, people watching this video are laughing more so than shaking in fear). 1). Ron Paul understands that a president is not a dictator. You can propose legislation, veto legislation you don't agree with, sign approved legislation into law, and that's it. You cannot force..
aheadatime 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we should ALL write in Ron Paul if he doesnt get nominated....can you imagine how the elite and the media will be FORCED to respond if someone who's not even a candidate WINS the popular vote???
CarolinasPGApro 1 month ago
nice editing neo con
babadios 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry well look at your lightsaber bar. I'd say the majority of people got a problem with your vid.
sssn1p3d 1 month ago
ConservativeCavalry Complete Editing Fail
A801506 1 month ago
Every video on YouTube that 'Hates' on Dr. Paul has x10 more dislikes than likes.
Ron Paul 2012
Snappedsoul 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is not being mentioned on the media and they are setting him up to seem as a crazy lunatic... but thats only because the fucking media is own by the fucking system! SNAP OUT OF IT PEOPLE! Ron Paul knows what's up and we should have great respect form him because he knows what he is up against and still faces it. want a hint? illuminati,freemasons,skulls&bones,(i dont wanna go there but..)9.11, its all a fucking lie people.
patobond007 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012 USUCKBRO
dwpride 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL is not for SALE! He is for the people by the people!
Donate to the revolution today and restore America now!
ronpaul2012dotcom dailypauldotcom
jboles633 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012!
Studsforchicks 1 month ago
I don't see the fail,
TheMonsterAlexRex 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry I love how you and so many other people still don't understand what America needs. Go ahead, make these videos. Ron Paul supporters will overwhelm your asses! RP 2012! Good day sir.
sssn1p3d 1 month ago 40
This has been flagged as spam show
@sssn1p3d Yep, that support is overwhelming. How many primaries has he won? Come in second? Finished dead last?
ConservativeCavalry 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry Because Americans are brain dead like yourself
Snappedsoul 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry CUZ OF CUNTS LIKE U WHO DONT WANT THE SITUATION OF OUR COUNTRY TO IMPROVE.
127prats 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry How many primaries have there been?Oh yeah, just three-and the only reason why he isn't winning is because neoconservative voters like you haven't woken up yet.The only candidate who understands the debt problem is Paul;other candidates (I'm assuming you like Gingrich/Santorum) are planning to increase the debt by policing the world and creating gov't interventions to our personal lives-a DIRECT violation of the Constitution.The Founding Fathers would agree with Ron Paul!
MrChaco007 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry How many wives has he cheated on? How many flip flops has he done? How many ObamaCares has he written.
The difference between my questions and yours is that they mean something.
mayne242 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry well there is no consistency in whos winning... so whats your point you rather anyone else then him to win? you'll take someone who made billions destroying companies, or someone who made millions "consulting/lobbying and left one wife because she was dying cheated on the other and is on his 3rd, or the other guy who like the others wants to wage war in every country that may not like the united states...
briant2828 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry How many primaries have you won? Come in second? Finished dead last? Are you running for US President? No? Then shut the fuck up traitor!
mainmedic 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry your video has 32 likes and 700 dislikes, Ronald Reagan took 3 tries to become president, the first three primaries mean absolutely nothing, Just give it 4 months and your probably going to have 32 likes and 15,000 dislikes
dragsterf 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry
He challenged the other candidates to a 25 mile bike ride not a walk around the block.
bobdull420 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry look at the like/dislike bar. that's one way they're overwhelming. and the reason why he hasn't been winning the primaries and all that is because the mainstream media is inoring him, and not spreading his mesage to the people.
thgirwjt 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry Your vids are complete failures, sell your computer and buy some war bonds. lol
globalchaos1984 1 month ago
@ConservativeCavalry And how often do you see Dr. Paul even mentioned on the mainstream media? Even when he was winning or in second, they completely ignored him and talked about who was in third or fourth.
ItsTheKyleDriver 4 weeks ago
@ConservativeCavalry By chance are you Jewish?
CondorDMaDnD2ed 3 weeks ago
@ConservativeCavalry just goes to show how stupid people are. The only people really against him are the big people with all the money and power which are the people that he hurts. And people are too stupid, so when one of the big guys say ron paul sucks; only mitt can be obama, all the sheeple gather together and obediently listen to orders.
ILOVEPIEGGWP 3 weeks ago
I gotta love this bullshit that Ron Paul is against the "big people" and is for the "little guy." Is that why he opposes having the government help the poor have access to healthcare? Is that why he opposes any and all worker regulations, including the minimum wage? If he's for helping the little guy who's being shit on by the man, why does he oppose the Civil Rights Act? You Paultards are such fucking morons.
Edgehead10075 3 weeks ago
So his fail was that he didn't have an instant answer for that weird question?
crashmidget15 1 month ago
I keep watching videos saying "Ron Paul is bad" and all they do is display reasons why i will vote for him...
mattwg2009 1 month ago 37
I'm not sure what you were thinking when you put this video up; Ron Paul makes a good argument, then the moderator brings up the challenge of a divided Congress. Every President has to deal with Congress. We elect a President to execute his duties, not Congress'. The Executive Branch submits the majority of bills to Congress, and I'd much rather have Ron Paul's people submitting stuff than somebody else. I think Ron Paul can bring Congress together better than any of these other guys.
fadedflage 1 month ago
most republicans and democrats, demonize themselves. Except for Ron Paul. I hope he finds the faults of all these disgusting politicians. And all you people who disagree with him, well, have fun being the cause of our country's destruction and collapse. I have to wake up everyday and deal with all these moron people who only care about their selves. Dont people like this uploader just make you want to puke. I know i do. Just disgusting human behavior
TheStranger789 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
link needs to go viral. If it affected you, I imagine it was because humans appreciate what they understand-how it works=self empowerment
People do not respond, are trained to be indifferent to that which they do not understand fully=fear of change=fear of loss.
The only way to take control from those whom wish enslave is by revolution...or education.
Spread the word everywhere you go.
youtube.com/watch?v=g_lYGyIaK80
Costs nothing to 'learn' Romney/Obama=Central Bankers
drmaddogs2u 1 month ago
Total WIN.
Ron Paul R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 2012!
purechaos2000 1 month ago
ron paul 2012 baby fuck the retards that dont see that
Justinlibertarian 1 month ago
@Justinlibertarian
You took the words right out of my mouth! Liberty is not dead. How do these people not see his consistency and integrity. Must be the water!?
realtysolutions123 1 month ago
@conservativecalvary it would be less biased if you would allow the applause to sound at the end, that's all i was trying to say. Nothing more. We done here?
EducationalTime 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
NDAA Signed by Obama, Defended by McCain who supports and endorses Mitt Romney. Whats going on here?
Revolution2012RP 1 month ago
I got the dislikes to 600!!!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!! And I am your Neighbor to the north! If he gets in relations between USA and Canada will grow so much.
TheJayWar 1 month ago
597 DISlikes. 27 likes. Take a hike idiot. Your points are baseless and you are a fool...or paid...to not support the only honest man running for President.
BrandiRem 1 month ago
Here's a basic fact for you. The economy is not supposed to be based on the money in your wallet but on production and substance. The value of the computer I'm using is about it's performance, durability and perhaps appearance, NOT BY HOW MUCH IT COST! We don't need a central bank, it creates false prosperity and problems with our economy. So far now we are not a nation of production, more a nation of consuming.
beatboxbill 1 month ago