Added: 3 years ago
From: kg6dgv
Views: 29,938
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It matters who owns it......who's receiving the money into their bank accounts from the interest on the money they invented? 

  • So this talk was in 1993. There would be much more to say about the failures of The Fed now.

  • This whole series is great! THANKS FOR POSTING!!! I've had two copies of this book, let others borrow them and never got them back! Can anybody tell me is it still available?

  • @wishmolly Spot on, to be specific it was agents of the Bank of England who tried to assassinate Andrew Jackson, 3 times I think. Not sure why you thought I was American, but no problem. Pity Jackson did'nt manage to kill the Bank of England as well, along with their nasty chief shareholders or we might live in a better world today. I'm not too great on religious faith either but I'll take any help that's going against the globalist fascist garbage we all suffer from. No harm in asking?

  • @wishmolly Not sure what Ron Paul's chances are but I would'nt drive past any grassy knolls if I was him. Good luck from Scotland too. We do all need it and maybe a prayer is'nt a bad idea either.

  • @wishmolly I totally agree with you on the central banks and fractional reserve banking. Control of the political system by corporations is by definition fascism and control is what they have, so fascist is their true designation. They are no less fascist because we have the privillege of voting for their bought and paid for political creatures every few years. The lunatics are in charge of the assylum and it shows.

  • @wishmolly No single country is to blame for this and as you say we are all in it together Dutch, German, French, Greek, British, Irish or any of us. Cooperation yes, mutual aid yes, even a giant trading block I can stand, despite my belief that jobs will flow out to low pay countries. Loss of sovereignty and control over your own currency and economic system no. It's not the nation state that causes war, it's the fascist maniacs who own the oil. war and bank industries and we all have them.

  • @wishmolly Correction agreed, my sympathy with the Netherlands.

  • OMG!! You said it right there! Just as I thought. What slaves we are. Time for real CHANGE!!

  • @NeoKiryu Way back in the days of the second world war, there were not as many government institutions that had become corrupted nor as many constitutional protections that had been damaged or good laws rewritten. Corruption is at an all time high for this civilization . And there's always hope.

  • 2:10 this is why we know that Ron Paul and Sarah Patin are put forward to make it look like there is real opposition, when in fact they are not going to do any thing that will really matter.

  • I appeal to all Americans to look at the British experence and see what is down the road. We were bankrupted by wars and a huge military sustained by debt. We gradually slipped from trade surplus to trade deficit as manufacturers invested in cheap labour abroad. We needed too much money to pay all that tax for all that debt and still have a good standard of living. Sucked into the European union where we pay the most into it. I am sorry to say we are your future. It's a system of bankruptsy.

  • This video is a fantastic compliment to his book. The book was truly life-changing. FYI for more info on the mechanics of the monetary system, search "Why we are in so much debt" you YouTube.

  • We "buy" nothing.....in FACT, "we" have no power to resist the barage of laws passed. To say the Am. Public "buy" their lies and arguments is to blame those who are being victimized as we sit here like mushrooms without the power to stop these b_ _ _ _ _ds!

  • Humanity must get rid of debts and loans - put tax on goods only. Government loans is first step. To have a dozen of rich bankers playing with governments and humans should't be. In a phase out periode, you can have corporations loaning money from any savings and say, after ten years any loaning is illegal.

  • central banks in europe are direct agencies of their respective governments??

    "Neither the ECB nor the national central banks (NCBs), nor any member of their decision-making bodies, are allowed to seek or take instructions from European Community institutions or bodies, from any government of an EU Member State or from any other body".

  • central banks in europe are direct agencies of their respective governments?? i don;t think so!! They are independant institutions at least the ECB and Greek central bank.

    "The independence of the ECB is conducive to maintaining price stability. This is supported by extensive theoretical analysis and empirical evidence on central bank independence."

  • @ kg6dgv.......do you know when (what date) he gave this talk?

  • I can say this is one of the most important series of videos on Youtube... Thank you for posting!!!!!!!!! Soooo much!

  • isn't it funny that the federal reserve owns most if not all commercial banks. the same banks that made some messed up loans and got bailed out. we need to wake up and do something about it.

  • i agree olga, the question is if the population make their voice heard early enough that we don't live in a police state but with the bailout money flying out the door i believe more then likely the planning body of the banking "cartel" must feel that it is far to late for public opinion to reverse their plan of action while they own most of congress and the white house, what ever that plan may be....

  • We have a totalitarian governing body whose lies are getting ever more brazen, as the time for turning things around decreases exponentially.

  • @olga2415

    That time has come and gone my friend, you will never see the America of our parents and grand-parents.

  • @fel121 So sad...

  • The 16th amendment of our constitution (federal income tax) was created the same year as the Federal Reserve act in 1913. Something smells fishy!

  • we have to end the fed.

  • fuck new york

  • so which country should i move to?

  • good stuff!

  • it would take approximately four generations of Americans to pay off the interest of the U.S. Treasury bonds sold as debt to create the $1 trillion stimulus package, factoring in a 3 percent growth rate in the economy throughout that time.

    This is precisely what Obamas borrow and spend bill is all about — extending reach of the national debt owed to the bankers into distant future. It has nothing to do with welfare or socialism claim.has to do with debt slavery. It has to do with control.

  • You're smart, Bro.

    Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

  • Obama INHERITED this situation...he did not CREAT it.

  • People voted for change, not chains. Everything needs to be done right now -don't read a piece of legislation longer than War and Peace - it's got to be voted on now to save the country, to save our way of life. All our lives are changed now and not for the better. 18 months ago had unemployment at 3.1 % and companies couldn't find employees - today the rate 20%, they just simply lied about the stimulus that no one read before voting. no one read before signing. OBOMA LIED AND AMERICA DIED.

  • Obama didn't lie...he simply inherited a system that he is attempting to fix. And, ifixing it isn't going to happen overnight. America has NOT died, and it's not Obama's fault...it's his predecessor!

  • You have to recognise that, he was notured by zgbiniew brezsinski right from college at columbia university where brezsinski was a professor. If there wasnt a bigger force at play, he wouldnt have gotten to the senate given his ineligibility.

    So understand, why his campaign was ready from day one, operating very efficiently. How could someone so unpopular then generate so much cash. This nurturing and preparation has been in the works hes here for destruction.your prize is a free flu shot

  • Stimulus packages were started by Bush, NOT Obama. The last one was put into effect by Bush, and Obama had to continue it. The war was inherited by Obama, not started by him. And, if situations repeat themselves, after the war is "over" we will find ourselves in a "moment of prosperity"....Check your economics notes from high school...

  • Seems to me you're afraid to either be labelled a racist or you're stuck with a liberal mentality. I'm sorry, but nowadays , the word liberal has been twisted around from it's original meaning. Now it basically stands for "everyone should be happy! Everything should be beautiful! ALl should be dandy! All is GOOD , my farts smell like roses!" unfortunately, that mindset is extremely harmful to society, and i would at least ask of you that you fully understand the impacts of what you defend are.

  • first of all, I'm not racist: I voted for Obama because we needed a change. And, I DO have a liberal mentality, like it or not. That's what makes us a democracy. YOU, my friend, are unhappy because we DON'T have the republicans in office now because we DEMOCRATS/LIBERALS got TIRED of his crap. He cost us TOO much money, TOO much time, and he did NOT do what he said he was going to do...PERIOD.

  • Someone went a little ahead of himself! Assumptions are rarely fact. And you also misread me. I didn't call you a racist. I too thought Obama "might" change something, until i actually watched closely what he has done. You need a deep understanding of economics to fully grasp the damage of the concept his "masters" follow through. I can't really debate with you, since i know fundamentally liberalism is a fruit of gullibility and ignorance. You most likely wouldn't get the point.

  • As you said, "assumptions are rarely fact", but you contradict yourself when you ASSUME that "You most likely wouldn't get the point."..."Seems to me you're afraid to either be labelled a racist or you're stuck with a liberal mentality"...your other assumption. It's apparent you like to argue on your own terms rather than invite intelligent conversation.

  • That's called comming to a conclusion. And i was right, you didn't get the point. And i was right, you're a liberal. So my conclusion was right on wasn't it? I rarely assume, i had the information to conclude and i used it. You however jumped right ahead with no information about me what so ever and you judged me with no basis. so I conclude that you are unable to have an intelligent conversation to begin with. I never attacked you once, until now.

  • i love how before we speak in this country, we have to add little phrases like 'before you call me a racist, let me tell you i'm not'.....it shows how much the accusation racism, sexism, homophobia, and anti semetism is used to silence opposition.

  • Yes, and this belies the contention by so many that we are a "free people who can speak their minds about anything." It's more like we cannot agree even on the time of day. And this is as our controllers want it to be. It is sad to say, but Americans have refused to be aware too long about too much; it's almost too late to turn things around. It takes at least 40-60 years for an effective revolution of thought to take effect. With all the arguments, what are the odds?

  • oh and i would like to add. The new liberal movement is essentially a religion to control the masses into beleiving that the world can be beautiful, by offering solution that hinders progress. Socialism can work, no doubt, but you've got to have the capital to afford it, otherwise it will cause death and decay.

  • so, apparently, you are FOR this war that was, essentially, started by Bush's FATHER, and you are FOR the war that has so many of our men dying, and their wives struggling to take care of kids...but, you CANNOT put the blame on the BUSH's that STARTED this whole damned mess. Uh-huh...sounds like a good solution to me.

  • And demonizing people as soon as they offer an alternate view is disingeneous at best. If you ask left and right, nobody really wants war, so don't assume they do. You assume that people actually caused this war, like hell we did. The president acted against the majority of people who were against the war. Clearly, you're a decent individual and angered at the evils of the world. The problem is, your solution actually furthers the problem.

  • Did I offer any kind of solution?  I don't think so, because there is no way in hell we are ever going to pull all the troops out of this war before our lifetime has ended. AND, some of those former Republicans even voted for Obama because THEY were tired of the crap.

  • Liberals always advocate bigger problems than the problems themselves economically. That's my conclusion. You gave me the information necessary for me to conclude. "And, I DO have a liberal mentality, like it or not". So yea, i would suggest to stop lying to yourself and face reality. I don't know if you're worshipping Obama or not, but your defense of him is a blatant display of lunacy. You have not seen his actions, all you have heard are his words. And he always ...ALWAYS does the opposite.

  • Obama Escalates Afghanistan Quagmire Barack Obamas Obama has turned out to be eerily similar in the warmongering department.

    One of Obamas first foreign policy decisions commander-in-chief was to copy Bushs Iraq troop surge with a surge of his own in Afghanistan.U.S. troop presence increased from 32,000 at the start of 2009 to about 57,000 presently cap 68,000 more than double the U.S. commitment Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced it could climb even beyond the 68,000 number.

  • That was, and is, an attempt to END the problem with Iraq, which Bush started 8 years ago. I have total faith that Obama will end that mess and bring our people home...but, because of Bush, it will ALWAYS be necessary to keep troops there. Not Obama's fault.

  • Well, he continues the same policies, more or less. Bush or Obama... same shit, different names.

  • As you know, the government is way behind popular opinion, by probably 10 years. Obama is NOT, nor is ANY other president, going to make changes overnight. There are politics that are in the way. Obama is NOT primarily in charge, nor is he able to bully anyone to do what he wants, especially when it comes to elected officials. So, blame it on the right people: THE PUBLIC. THEY were the ones who elected him, as well as who elected Bush. Obama is TRYING. Bush ran us into the ground.

  • Of course the public is to blame for not seeing through the lies of the politicians, but that doesn't change the fact that Obama's and Bush's policies are fundamentally the same when practiced. I'm sure that if Obama would have been president over the same years Bush were, he would do the same things. Niether respects the Constitution.

    You also have to remember that the neo-cons originates from the Democratic party.

  • First of all, who the hell are the "neo-cons"? Secondly, politics has and always will be dirty. Obama is only in his first few months of his administration, and you are blaming HIM for this mess? How can you say "you are sure he would do the same thing" when Obama was NOT in office then...c'mon...give him a chance before you crucify him...If you'd seen so many other administrations before Obama, you'd know this happens every time. I almost believe term limits should be abolished!

  • oh, hell..you aren't even an American citizen. I just clicked on your name, and I can't even read your site to understand a word about what you are saying.  Put it up in English, and if you can't, don't speak to this issue.

  • Don't you know what neo-conservatism is? The neo-cons are Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, etc.

    And I'm not blaming Obama for the mess, I'm saying that his policies are fundamentaly the same as Bush's. Deficit spending, maintaining the empire, interfering in the economy, etc. One thing good he has done though is closing down Guantanamo Bay. But still, he is far from the major changes that I believe USA needs.

    I have my presentation in both Swedish and English, so please, click again.

  • As I click on your name, Bjorinn, I am taken directly to a page that is in Swedish...Now, are you an American Citizen? I don't mind foreigners speaking to our issues, or even empathizing with us, but I'll be damned if I'm going to sit here and let you criticize us when or if you were never part of our electoral process.

  • Oh, I see, so I can't criticize what's going on in any other country except my own? And no, I'm not an American citizen. I'm just concerned about what's going on the USA because it effects the rest of the world economically and in other ways. If the US Government stayed within the confinds of the Consitution the USA and the rest of the world would be much better off. That's my opinion...

  • granted, you have that right to criticize. I also have to agree that the US is one of the most arrogant nations in the world. But, what I don't appreciate is the fact that you are so quick to judge a president who only inherited the situation he is in. We CAN agree on the fact that our elected officials don't follow the constitution, and twist it to their needs. I am FOR socialized medicine, as well. BUT: you MUST live here to UNDERSTAND it, good OR bad.

  • How do you think Obama became President from obscurity? The Levers of Power put him there. Same as the dummy known as GWB.

  • @louis12346 couldn't have said it better. I like what Ron Paul called Obama, a corporatist, not a socialist.

  • @louis12346 treason, down with the fed scum

  • @louis12346

    You are aware Bush started the stimulus mess and Obama just picked up the ball Bush fumbled and ran with it right? I know rewriting history to fit a Republican talking point is all the rage today but...

  • @louis12346

    You are aware Bush started the stimulus mess and Obama just picked up the ball Bush fumbled and ran with it right? I know rewriting history to fit a Republican talking point is all the rage today but...

    On the day President Bush took office, the national debt stood at $5.727 trillion. The latest number from the Treasury Department shows the national debt now stands at more than $9.849 trillion. That's a 71.9 percent increase on Mr. Bush's watch.

  • Wasn't the bank failures of 1907 directly caused by the families that now own the fed reserve? They bought up these smaller banks and called in the loans which caused the banks to fail.

  • yes

  • Nice find. prophetic, huh?

  • You are doing a great job here .. keep up the exemplary work.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more