I was surprised that I actually learned something new in this video but the same time I was disappoint because you didn't show other viewers how you can actually calculate that. Or you just assumed that they already knew how to calculate it (like me) but only wanted to show a different, neater way to solve this.
@prajwalsuhas He's using the local minimums of the bubble's free energy to describe why the bubbles form certain shapes, but this concept doesn't necessarily allow you to calculate the geometry which 'connects' the towns.
I wanted to correct you at @3:18 - there is another possibility - if one of the corners of original triangle is larger than 120 degrees. What happens then? :)
Thanks for sharing the practical approach to this theoretical issue. Is the question when it comes to infrastructure really for the length of the road, or which roads will most likely produce less traffic? I mean the more points in the perimiter the closer the ideal seems to reach the shape of a circle, however when it comes to towns that seems to be a less and less probable constellation.
Applause! Hey, did you ever see a bloke called Cyril Eisenberg demoing this? I remember being taken to one of his lectures when I was small. Never forgotten the trick since then!
@mildlydiverting No I haven't, but it's a cool trick that goes round mathematical circles. It's nice to hear it stuck with you! It must have impressed you! :D
This happens to be the topic of our math circle lecture this Saturday (December 10, 2011). Drop by if you happen to be in the Dallas area. Just google Metroplex Math Circle.
How cool! I wrote an essay about the mathematical properties of soap bubbles about a year ago, this one was also included :)! I also had to do a presentation about it and it was a lot of fun to show this to the class.
Ok, I can't draw it here, so lets number given points in order from 1 through 7. Lets place 5 points inside this imaginary septagon a through e.
Connections: 1a, 2b, 3b, 4c, 5d, 6e, 7e, ab, bc, de, ea. Is this the most optimal solution? I was also wondering, how should one approach this problem in mind (i.e. without using a soap solution) in general?
I was wondering what is the steiner tree solution for vertices of a regular septagon? I was trying to figure out myself, one of the minimizing solution I could think of had a regular pentagon in the middle. Is that right?
Whilst I didn't completely understand the 'Steiner points', it was completely fascinating. Wish you'd taken mathematics when I was at school. Smashing channel, Jim! I'll be following more of your brain teasers. :D
@akaashbits I liked your "approach", really interesting perspective, wish I could think like that. However, 2 things:
(1) r is not 0.5. If AB=BC=CD=DA=1, Ato1=Dto1=Bto2=Cto2=(1/sqrt3), Use Pythagoras/Katyayana 30-60-90 triangle. So, 1to2=(1-1/sqrt3). Add the lengths, you get (1+sqrt3)
(2) Essentially, you cannot "ASSUME" this to be regular hexagon just like that. In fact, as proven, it would be terrible assumption to make. In such a case, AB will be longer than AD, also none of the sides = 1.
Just came to my mind that , smallest route for 8 points , looks like honeycomb, where I guess Honeybee knows the smallest route to connect points or to create an efficient way of creating honeycomb ! Awesome !
Neocon70, bet you get your butt rammed X to infinite. Its because guys like this we owe everything too, from toothpaste to cars to anything science. What the hell have you done to make human life better, Ohhhh ya, you get laid, congrats you stupid monkey
The original video description said What is the minimum amount of roads needed to connect these four towns together? Not how much road or least distances of it
@singingbanana You should try adding a step in your setup (it would basically simulated different costs for the construction of the road, or the fastest way to reach someone drowning in the sea when you're on the beach). You'd see the bubble bend just where the step is, and choose a longer way in the part "on" the step (at least if you put the step in the middle of the way), where the height of the bubble is smaller. I guess with a slope you'd see a curvy bubble (never tried).
wait... if the 8 towns "soapwater solution" is just a bit smaller than conecting them in a circle, would leaving towns a and b unconected directly not make there be less road? (this was confusing to write and id understand if you didnt understand it.)
@singingbanana I think what mik3p0wer meant is that you could take the external solution (a continous octagon) and remove one road. Everything would still be connected, but the solution would use !7( less road.
@mickyjunior88 There's a link in the description about slime mold and the Tokyo railway system. Turns out slime mold grows in the same way and gives the same result as the railway network.
@singingbanana what about issues of geography and simple matter of fact issues like how towns evolved due to other reaons such as natural resources...
this video pisses me off just because i've had to learn years of calculus to even comprehend how to solve this problem on paper...and you do it in a few seconds with freaking soap. >.<
About the 8 towns, one of the roads on the perimeter can be cut. that way you would use seven roads and you can still get around the towers. (however it may not be convenient)
@JohnnyLukeB -part 3-average of your horizontal velocity and your final vertical velocity, which (assuming you use the same energy for jumping away as you would if you were jumping upwards) will always be the smallest speed, unless you jump away from the building EXTREMELY fast, even though you will still hit the ground with the same force as if you just fell off the building. Sorry for using three comments while writing this lol - but if some of the things i said didn't make any sense, i'd be
@JohnnyLukeB -part 2-drop in height from the building will both be added to your kinetic energy (movement energy) powering your downward velocity (velocity is your speed in a certain direction), which will be greater than your downward velocity if you just fall off the building, and just have the energy for the height of the building added to your kinetic energy. If you jumped away from the building, your end speed would be even less! This is because your final speed would basically be an ave
@JohnnyLukeB You would reach the highest speed if you jumped upwards off the building first. This is because when you jump, you are turning your chemical energy into potential energy (which is basically a measure of how far away from the earth you are) to push yourself away from the earth. Once gravity overcomes your upward velocity however, you will fall the distance you just gained, and the 40 storeys of the building, so the potential energy which you created and the potential energy of the d
This has nothing to do with this video, but i was wondering: If you were on the top of a 40 story building, would you have more speed right before you hit the ground if you jumped off of the building outwards, if you jumped off upwards, or if you just fell off of the building? Please put a lot of details in the video (if you choose to make it) and put in some details, like aerodynamics, and please answer this because ive been pondering over this question for days!
Wow, never thought I would actually hear some maths explained, and not ONLY would I understand, but wthen hear the phrase "and here is how it applies to the real world".
Proof once again you would make an awesome teacher or something, because not only do you teach, you also bother to give a reason WHY you are teaching any given subject or problem. Though maybe it was just all my teachers that were rubbish, who knows.
This is your coolest video I've seen so far.
MrTanookiMario 9 hours ago
I love the graph: energy vs something
xanshriekal 1 day ago
this is fucking brilliant
vilkav 2 days ago
but if you haven't been... then no thanks
what's great about maths, I think, is that you experiment with your intuition at the same time which betters your approach to life in general
Redflowers9 1 week ago
uh Haiche?
You mean "an h", right?
zavatone 1 month ago
4:46 MIND BLOWN!
eddyproca 1 month ago
I was surprised that I actually learned something new in this video but the same time I was disappoint because you didn't show other viewers how you can actually calculate that. Or you just assumed that they already knew how to calculate it (like me) but only wanted to show a different, neater way to solve this.
FL0myFL0 1 month ago 3
@FL0myFL0 I wasn't trying to make a lecture.
singingbanana 1 month ago 3
@singingbanana jesus christ where the HELL were you in from 1997-1999 when i tried stuff like this and got called a downie by my maths teacher.
StikManJones 3 weeks ago
This is reducing to a problem of finding a Local minimum. Interesting.
prajwalsuhas 1 month ago
@prajwalsuhas He's using the local minimums of the bubble's free energy to describe why the bubbles form certain shapes, but this concept doesn't necessarily allow you to calculate the geometry which 'connects' the towns.
nessdude14 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@singinbanana Does it also work on irregular positions of cities ?
shriyash134 1 month ago
Does it also work on irregular positions of cities ?
shriyash134 1 month ago
@shriyash134 Yes it does.
singingbanana 1 month ago
"Murray? Present!"
kalfen 2 months ago
I wanted to correct you at @3:18 - there is another possibility - if one of the corners of original triangle is larger than 120 degrees. What happens then? :)
matematikosburelis 2 months ago
Comment removed
gjermundification 2 months ago
@matematikosburelis Where is the correction? I only see you state a condition and question that condition.
gjermundification 2 months ago
Im writing a huge paper on soap films and optimization problems. This helped me a lot. You are awesome! :D
selinadenseje 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks for sharing the practical approach to this theoretical issue. Is the question when it comes to infrastructure really for the length of the road, or which roads will most likely produce less traffic? I mean the more points in the perimiter the closer the ideal seems to reach the shape of a circle, however when it comes to towns that seems to be a less and less probable constellation.
gjermundification 2 months ago
Comment removed
gjermundification 2 months ago
Comment removed
gjermundification 2 months ago
You are brilliant
alexglew 2 months ago
I love the axis labels as 3:56
xCelsius451x 2 months ago
Applause! Hey, did you ever see a bloke called Cyril Eisenberg demoing this? I remember being taken to one of his lectures when I was small. Never forgotten the trick since then!
mildlydiverting 2 months ago 2
@mildlydiverting No I haven't, but it's a cool trick that goes round mathematical circles. It's nice to hear it stuck with you! It must have impressed you! :D
singingbanana 2 months ago
@singingbanana Woh! Turns out he actually wrote the book on the subject - check Amazon under Cyril Isenberg - and got an MBE!
He was a nice man, worked at the University of Kent. Had a great line in smoke-ring physics, too.
mildlydiverting 2 months ago
@mildlydiverting Erm, and now i read your full description, I see you link to an article by him. Cough. Sorry.
mildlydiverting 2 months ago
@mildlydiverting I thought I recognised the name! Sorry, I haven't thought about this problem for a while. Yes, he's the man on this stuff.
singingbanana 2 months ago
creative !
lailamnma 2 months ago
Analogic mathematics <3
Thx
valkirikiri 2 months ago
This happens to be the topic of our math circle lecture this Saturday (December 10, 2011). Drop by if you happen to be in the Dallas area. Just google Metroplex Math Circle.
djcordeiro 2 months ago
great video, thanks. maybe put the u-shape drawing back up at 4:22?
hnkang 2 months ago
Very cool! Get this chappo on TV. Very good at explaining some genuinely interesting stuff!
chulk607 2 months ago
See kids, this is why learning mathematics is useful.
CrestalMyth 2 months ago
If you are organic chemist, you are impressed
imamnalog 3 months ago
@imamnalog Or a Computer Scientist. These are fundamental problems in computational geometry!
Zanneth 2 months ago
Awesome video, the models are an interesting idea!
tikomichael 3 months ago
similar to organic bonding, they take the shortest path, optimization
123pammi 3 months ago
pretty cool stuff..im impressed
i103772 3 months ago
i, for one, bow down to our new soapy water overlords
ziyan133 3 months ago 2
Thumbs up if you're from UW and have to watch this haha
alohasprinting 4 months ago
How cool! I wrote an essay about the mathematical properties of soap bubbles about a year ago, this one was also included :)! I also had to do a presentation about it and it was a lot of fun to show this to the class.
xxSichaye 4 months ago
That was cool ,I wish my math teacher was cool like this XD
kassieanne9 4 months ago in playlist Liked
This has been flagged as spam show
CHRISTMAS CASH MADE NOW!! > >FREE & EASY money in just HOURS!!
You can make FAST cash within just hours with this incredible program!! Go here….. TINA-WORKATHOME.WS
tinalb100 4 months ago
i feel like a retard :(
Kurana4390e 5 months ago
ya i dont do math on youtube jk
jimgati 5 months ago
Ok, I can't draw it here, so lets number given points in order from 1 through 7. Lets place 5 points inside this imaginary septagon a through e.
Connections: 1a, 2b, 3b, 4c, 5d, 6e, 7e, ab, bc, de, ea. Is this the most optimal solution? I was also wondering, how should one approach this problem in mind (i.e. without using a soap solution) in general?
vedhasp 5 months ago
I was wondering what is the steiner tree solution for vertices of a regular septagon? I was trying to figure out myself, one of the minimizing solution I could think of had a regular pentagon in the middle. Is that right?
vedhasp 5 months ago
Whilst I didn't completely understand the 'Steiner points', it was completely fascinating. Wish you'd taken mathematics when I was at school. Smashing channel, Jim! I'll be following more of your brain teasers. :D
markashleyfilms 5 months ago
Question:
Shouldn't that be 2.5 instead of (1+√3)?
Proof:
Side of an hexagon = r (where r = distance from center to a corner).
Since, r = 1/2, one Side of Hexagon = 0.5.
There are 5 such sides in your solution (as shown in 2:41), so answer = 5r = 2.5.
I might be wrong here, but am willing to learn!
akaashbits 5 months ago
@akaashbits I liked your "approach", really interesting perspective, wish I could think like that. However, 2 things:
(1) r is not 0.5. If AB=BC=CD=DA=1, Ato1=Dto1=Bto2=Cto2=(1/sqrt3), Use Pythagoras/Katyayana 30-60-90 triangle. So, 1to2=(1-1/sqrt3). Add the lengths, you get (1+sqrt3)
(2) Essentially, you cannot "ASSUME" this to be regular hexagon just like that. In fact, as proven, it would be terrible assumption to make. In such a case, AB will be longer than AD, also none of the sides = 1.
vedhasp 5 months ago
so energetic
SuperEarnburn 5 months ago
why is the soapy water greem?!?!?! D:
GammaZero 5 months ago
Awesome!
astoma199 5 months ago
Lol, I wish every optimization problem can be solved with a soap
idkravitz 5 months ago
This is so Feynman-like ... amazing applications mate.
fatkasuvayu 5 months ago
how can someone with a name like singingbanana be so mathey
rcsparks01 5 months ago
Fucking awesome. WTH it didn't even have boobies and i watched it from start to end.
sufilix 5 months ago
And there I was saying practical mathematics was an oxymoron.
soundslave 5 months ago
Wish my math teacher did stuff like this.
brageyboy 5 months ago
This guy is a freaking magician! Watch out David Blaine!
BachikoiBabi 5 months ago
Very good connection between nature and mathematics. Very well demonstrated!
phasespace 5 months ago
I think that I find your bowl of soap way too interesting
xetrius 5 months ago
Soapy water is smarter than man?
MadTimmy 5 months ago 101
@MadTimmy nature is smarter than human!
techvids21 1 month ago
thumbs up if weebl brought you here!
arcticbanana69 5 months ago
No way... He made maths interesting! 0o
TheViewOfCalvin 5 months ago
i love pies :3
NerdDog16 5 months ago
Ok, now I feel dumb
Jiskemarije 5 months ago
bahahaha, liverpudlian accent ftw
theph33r 5 months ago
Comment removed
AdamGreyable 5 months ago
cake
robiniroven 5 months ago
This is very cool!
Florence00pi 5 months ago
I genuinely enjoyed this.
jakoreilly 5 months ago
LOL. He said haych.
ChickenIzMLG 5 months ago
This is mindporn! :)
kenderpl 5 months ago
He looks like he fucking loves maths
merpzilla 5 months ago
what kind of wizardry is this lol
Benawisan 5 months ago
i laughed my ass of with how simple this was :P
Nice vid man :D
CyanideXCS93 5 months ago
That was fucking interesting.
JeefCakes 5 months ago
Why didn't weebl favourite this last week :/ would've passed maths
batllama 5 months ago
Great video, one thing though, next time you say "energy" you may not want to make a fisting motion.
recoil669 5 months ago
I don't know why any of this is important, but that was quite entertaining.
icecremer 5 months ago
Just came to my mind that , smallest route for 8 points , looks like honeycomb, where I guess Honeybee knows the smallest route to connect points or to create an efficient way of creating honeycomb ! Awesome !
sathvikmail 5 months ago
those internal local minimums look an awful lot like molecule formations
KinoftheFlames 5 months ago
@KinoftheFlames That's just nature being efficient :)
Direnaar 5 months ago
@KinoftheFlames Yeah thats what I was thinking..VSEPR.
ScorpiaX 5 months ago
I nearly died at 4:45
Mascaraud 5 months ago
Amazing!
Leruster 5 months ago
A cross works fine, if you put an extra turn in the roads, you've got more traffic! Dislike!
Ketsui 5 months ago
Very cool..
khorneboy888 5 months ago
Neocon70, bet you get your butt rammed X to infinite. Its because guys like this we owe everything too, from toothpaste to cars to anything science. What the hell have you done to make human life better, Ohhhh ya, you get laid, congrats you stupid monkey
forwardreza 5 months ago
What about 2 points?
Monkeyspass 5 months ago
I don't like math and I don't like logging into YouTube but this was so awesome I just had to let you know.
Bubdudder 5 months ago
are you a wizard
Styroplank 5 months ago
6 people were fired from their highway planning jobs.
TheBigMclargehuge 5 months ago
it just blown my mind :(
gugolski 5 months ago
MatheMagic!
drew2000four 5 months ago
Amazing
emarkman1 5 months ago
This needs more views.
AdenFlorian08 5 months ago
this is one of the best demonstrations i have seen on youtube
goodjob jim!
theodorehui 6 months ago
jim actually shot both videos on the same day lol
theodorehui 6 months ago
I would replace him for my math teacher any day
AlienX3124 6 months ago
@AlienX3124 i would replace him for Mathematics any day.
webmastertool 5 months ago
1. Finding the "solution" using bubble fluid? I see what you did there.
2. This (great) video reminds me of an interesting book called "The Mathematical Mechanic."
3. You make it look really hard to speak with an English accent. My face hurts when I watch your videos. No offense intended; maybe it's just me.
wrightmath 6 months ago
The original video description said What is the minimum amount of roads needed to connect these four towns together? Not how much road or least distances of it
GSA14101996 6 months ago
@singingbanana You should try adding a step in your setup (it would basically simulated different costs for the construction of the road, or the fastest way to reach someone drowning in the sea when you're on the beach). You'd see the bubble bend just where the step is, and choose a longer way in the part "on" the step (at least if you put the step in the middle of the way), where the height of the bubble is smaller. I guess with a slope you'd see a curvy bubble (never tried).
Beautiful to see!
balluduku 6 months ago
Too bad you can't use soapy water in the classroom ;)
aao198 6 months ago
Comment removed
aao198 6 months ago
loved that <3
LAHMOS 6 months ago
wait... if the 8 towns "soapwater solution" is just a bit smaller than conecting them in a circle, would leaving towns a and b unconected directly not make there be less road? (this was confusing to write and id understand if you didnt understand it.)
mik3p0wer 6 months ago 2
@mik3p0wer You're right it would be. I was just showing the internal solution, including steiner points, was longer than the external solution.
singingbanana 6 months ago 3
@singingbanana I think what mik3p0wer meant is that you could take the external solution (a continous octagon) and remove one road. Everything would still be connected, but the solution would use !7( less road.
Gameboygenius 5 months ago
Im not a fan of math and im personally not good at it,so belive me when i say this,You just sparked an intrest of math in me..plus you deserve a sub.
fog340 7 months ago
i didnt understand anything...but it was nice to watch :D (maybe my english is not that good) xD
ToppersMovieCorner 7 months ago
Thumbs up if 5 people didn't understand anything this guy said=))
skydive777 7 months ago
I knew about Surface Tension and stuff but THIS application is completely in a whole new level for me.
ThePassiveWatcher 7 months ago
I'd like to see this applied to roads separating real towns. Just because i'd like to see roads built like that.
mickyjunior88 7 months ago 8
@mickyjunior88 There's a link in the description about slime mold and the Tokyo railway system. Turns out slime mold grows in the same way and gives the same result as the railway network.
singingbanana 7 months ago 15
@singingbanana what about issues of geography and simple matter of fact issues like how towns evolved due to other reaons such as natural resources...
StargateMunky 5 months ago
What about drawing all possible lines that could be used between points, state their lengths between points then apply dijkstras algorithm?
Dmon1Unl 7 months ago
Amazing. Only response I could give for this video!
Emejapazco 7 months ago
Superb
paddycalla 7 months ago
So proud to be #British right now :')
davh27 7 months ago
to get to the lowest dancer you have to put in some energy first XD
MrAbdulmaster 7 months ago
yes i totally guessed it before i saw the end
TheNich8888 7 months ago
Mind equal blown....
deathgiver365 7 months ago
bio-inspired methods rule!!
khantatat 7 months ago
"This is were nature(?) is going to help us"...Physics are fine, but when it gets more complex I prefer living organisms:
Watch "Tokyo rail network designed by Physarum plasmodium"
dxjan 7 months ago
Nice .. very clever
NormalIsGreat 7 months ago
Phys Chem and Maths go well together :)
MrChump0 7 months ago
NERD POWER!!!!!!!!! FTW
cballew57 7 months ago
SOAP #FTW
ThePunkkapoika 7 months ago
1:08
Wtf is a "Haych"? Thumbs down.
thaer12345 7 months ago
you should seriously become a professor at Harvard University. haha!
lilsokzmuzic 7 months ago
interesting...
ChnDragun 7 months ago
OMG YOU HAVE BEEN TO MY SCHOOL :D
bobbyweelki 7 months ago
i saw this video on rodo(dot)lt , but just came here to tell, that i really didn't expected that :)
nice video bro
amfikz 7 months ago
so awesome
shingfunger 7 months ago
this video pisses me off just because i've had to learn years of calculus to even comprehend how to solve this problem on paper...and you do it in a few seconds with freaking soap. >.<
crimsonninja6995 7 months ago 174
@crimsonninja6995 Not only that, but he has now hands that do dishes that feel soft as your face...
shoseki 5 months ago
@shoseki oh wow, thanks for letting me know i got the top comment haha
crimsonninja6995 5 months ago
awesome video, great screen name "singing banana" LOL!!!
Jacob2Israel 7 months ago
i got close. I didnt know how to solve it but just doodling i got 2.79 and almost exactly the hexagon one
dracomister7 7 months ago
I love it when people explain math in a visual way, especially if it's higher level math like calculus of variations, awesome video man!
kyledude120 7 months ago
4:47 blew my mind
luckyw4ss4bi 7 months ago
your accent is sexy
unclesam115 7 months ago
You're a great speaker, great props also. Very interesting!
mattysterling 7 months ago
Love how you said "pythag" like a G6 :L
TheSnappy121 7 months ago
i found that utterly fascinating
edenite 7 months ago
you are litteraly the BEST person ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MyAwesome999 7 months ago
thats fkn awesome
MrKumbayah 7 months ago
fantastic vid. i did not expect that experimental approach.
macnolds 7 months ago
The smallest solution is 1 + sqrt(3)? PAROVE IT!
I wanted you to prove that there's no smaller way but you didn't! I guess I'll have to figure it out myself... *sigh*
anticorncob6 8 months ago
About the 8 towns, one of the roads on the perimeter can be cut. that way you would use seven roads and you can still get around the towers. (however it may not be convenient)
HappyApple330 8 months ago
Is their an actual outlined proof? Out of curiosity, are the lengths always constructable?
aznlalaland 8 months ago
@JohnnyLukeB -part 3-average of your horizontal velocity and your final vertical velocity, which (assuming you use the same energy for jumping away as you would if you were jumping upwards) will always be the smallest speed, unless you jump away from the building EXTREMELY fast, even though you will still hit the ground with the same force as if you just fell off the building. Sorry for using three comments while writing this lol - but if some of the things i said didn't make any sense, i'd be
cdplayerx50 8 months ago
@JohnnyLukeB -part 2-drop in height from the building will both be added to your kinetic energy (movement energy) powering your downward velocity (velocity is your speed in a certain direction), which will be greater than your downward velocity if you just fall off the building, and just have the energy for the height of the building added to your kinetic energy. If you jumped away from the building, your end speed would be even less! This is because your final speed would basically be an ave
cdplayerx50 8 months ago
Comment removed
cdplayerx50 8 months ago
@JohnnyLukeB You would reach the highest speed if you jumped upwards off the building first. This is because when you jump, you are turning your chemical energy into potential energy (which is basically a measure of how far away from the earth you are) to push yourself away from the earth. Once gravity overcomes your upward velocity however, you will fall the distance you just gained, and the 40 storeys of the building, so the potential energy which you created and the potential energy of the d
cdplayerx50 8 months ago
This has nothing to do with this video, but i was wondering: If you were on the top of a 40 story building, would you have more speed right before you hit the ground if you jumped off of the building outwards, if you jumped off upwards, or if you just fell off of the building? Please put a lot of details in the video (if you choose to make it) and put in some details, like aerodynamics, and please answer this because ive been pondering over this question for days!
JohnnyLukeB 8 months ago
That's thinking inside the box!
realesethesteam 8 months ago
Its so cool!!
1dexlab 8 months ago
Wow, never thought I would actually hear some maths explained, and not ONLY would I understand, but wthen hear the phrase "and here is how it applies to the real world".
Proof once again you would make an awesome teacher or something, because not only do you teach, you also bother to give a reason WHY you are teaching any given subject or problem. Though maybe it was just all my teachers that were rubbish, who knows.
RichPlaystation 8 months ago
YOU SIR ARE EINSTEIN OF YOUTUBE.
fix520 8 months ago
beast
charizard1357911 8 months ago
dude I wish you were related to me, you're going to be a legend
tk7kyle 8 months ago
Excellent video!
alquiora 8 months ago
You never shared - what is the solution for 8 towns?
BaXeD22 8 months ago
A graph of energy and something.
awesome.
Chessmaster777 8 months ago
I've seen this work with a cube before, too. Is that the same principle at work?
bugshirt4 8 months ago
I said it was the cross....but I'm a lay people!!!!
facilvenir 8 months ago
cool vid mate keep it up i love watching these vids:)
illusionboy10 8 months ago
so there's no clever math solution to this... is the soapy water really the best way?
Tolstoievsky 8 months ago