Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Do the whole country a favor Colorado.Throw out that pinko Bennet out in November.

  • Love It!

  • No can do. Too much fun baiting half-wits like you.

  • I got your half wit and it's up the crack of my ass, bitch..!!

  • How many Tea-Baggers does it take to change a light bulb?

    No one knows. They are afraid of the light.

  • How many liberals does it take to change a light bulb?

    At least ten, as they need to hold a debate on whether or not the light bulb exists. Even if they can agree upon the existence of the light bulb, they still might not change it, to keep from alienating those who might use other forms of light.

  • Not bad.

    Actually gave me a chuckle.

  • How many liberals does it take to "screw in" that light blub?

    It doesn't matter because they'll still remain in the dark.

  • Quit while you're ahead. Now you're just reaching.

  • What is the difference between a liberal and a puppy?

    A puppy stops whining after it grows up.

  • No, I'm not going to delete this. I think the more you drone on the more your self serving, condescending sense of superiority makes itself perfectly apparent to those who don't view everything through an obvious left wing ideological lense. Any objective observer realizes that the "tea baggers" as you call them are just average Americans.

    If you want to get past name calling and engage in a REAL debate I'm all for it. However, somehow I think in a true game of "wits" you come unarmed!

  • You insult all Americans when you call the Tea-Baggers representative of average Americans.

    Many of those nut cases see communism under their beds, and equate giving those without insurance a public option (CBO est. only 3% of pop. would be on the pub. opt.) with "government takeover of the health care system".

    Rush Limbaugh is their god and Fox News is their bible.

  • Still name calling I see. Incapable of a debate on the real issues.

    Well get this. I am a registered DEMOCRAT. I met many people in Washington DC in September who voted for Obama and are now VERY sorry they did. Yes, these are just average Americans. But what do I know? I was there in DC, in Fort Collins and Denver. I KNOW what the truth is. All you know is the UBER left wing drivel you read.

    Let me know if and when you decide to crawl out of your child restraint and debate me.

  • How about starting with why anyone would equate giving those without insurance a "public option" to "gov't health care" & "a gov't takeover of the HC system" when a) it's the only part of the plan funded by premiums, not taxpayers, & b) most people wouldn't even qualify for it & CBO estimates it would only have about 3% of the market, & c) In no other advanced nation has any form of public option destroyed the private insur. Industry.

  • a) Why destroy the current system for the benefit of 3%? The UBER left is hell bent on doing just that! They establish the rules for their "option" as well as for the companies they are supposedly "competing" with. The UBER left's idea of competing is to STAMP OUT competition. It's just like when Obama ran for his first state senate seat in IL. He didn't "compete" with ideas. He simply found ways to knock his competition off the ballot. They are trying to do the same to the insurance cos!

  • So It's "gov't take over" because the gov't would set the terms of coverage under it's insur. plan? How is that any different than private insur. co.s setting terms of coverage? Do you think you can set up an insurance plan and not tell people what's covered under the plan?

  • Your focus is too narrow. It goes beyond that. Listen and learn something. The LEFT is attempting to put the private insurance companies out of business, with our without a public option. If you REQUIRE that all insurance companies offer insurance without regard to pre-existing conditions BUT, on the other side of the equation, impose only a small fine that is a FRACTION of the actual cost of insurance, not only do you not succeed in convincing people who previously chose

  • not to have insurance to buy it, WORSE, you encourage those already paying for insurance to DROP IT because they know they can apply for insurance at any time and the companies would be required to offer it. What auto insurance company would stay in business if you could buy insurance AFTER you had an accide and still be covered for that accident?  NONE! It is no different in health insurance. Therefore, if you support this idea you are either STUPID or WANT the private companies GONE!

  • Brevity isn't your strong point is it?

    Where does the bill say you can buy insurance and have coverage retroactive? Cite section please.

  • Quck "sloganeering" seems to be your strong point.

    If I thought you were worth the energy I would look up the section. However, are you unaware that all of the pending legislation, in one form or another, requires insurance companies to accept all applicants without regard to pre-existing conditions? Are you also unaware the Senate Finance Committee bill (The Baucus Bill) reduced fines for those who do not purchase insurance to a fraction of the actual cost? I'm sure you can verify that.

  • I'd like to know hat section you arre referring to also. It is important you provide evidence. Something to support your claims...

  • Do your own research, if you dare. Go to newsDOTgoogleDOTcom and read any article regarding "The Baucus Bill".

  • As for gov't setting rules for insur, co's those rules prohibit discrimination for preexisting conditions or gender, stop the practice of dropping coverage if you get sick, eliminate the caps on insurance benefits, and close the doughnut hole for seniors.

  • This is very simple. It is one thing for the government to establish rules, so long as those rules are in keeping with the U. S. Constitution. It is quite another thing for that same goverment to then COMPETE with the same companies it regulates. It represents a fundamental conflict of interest.

    And please stop telling me about the other countries of the world. Without us most of those same countries would be living under either Facism or Communism.

  • I see you are of the belief that America is the saviour of the world...please, please do some more reading.

    WIthout the US quite a few countries in

    Latin America would have been able to exist in somewhat liberal democracies. C.I.A-backed dictatorships anyone?

  • I can see you are one of those, like Obama, who is an appologist for America. You are probably a Hugo Chavez fan too!

  • As for "stamping out insurance co's" why would anyone believe that the US is the only country in the world where a public option would destroy private insurance?

    Virtually every other advanced nation has both public option (or UHC) & private insur. options.

    As for your "UBER" thing & other digressions and rantings, if that's your idea of debate on HC reform, don't waste my time any further. .

  • I want to thank you for your MINDLESS, IRrational UBER left rantings. It will stay her as evidence for all to see!

  • I guess you missed the Canadian example.

  • b) Do you remember how all this started? "We have 46 million uninsured. We have a responsibility to take care of them". That's not what we have now. We now have a 1,990 page bill, with a price tag in excess of 1 TRILLION dollars that covers 46 million? No. Only THREE percent. Given this countries current economic circumstances that is hardly worth the cost. Oh, and about those CBO estimates. They are only as good as the input they are given from the LEFT. Garbage in, GARBAGE OUT!

  • c) Another UBER left talking point. BULLSHIT! I didn't just READ about Canada. I lived there. I have a daughter who was born there. Their current healthcare system started innocently with the government helping to finance hospitals in the 1950's By the 1980's the only entity remaining was the government. Hip replacement in America is about a 3 week wait. In Canada it's 12 to 18 months. They load you up on oxicontin to kill the pain. You are a drug addict before you ever get the surgery

  • Tea-Baggers.

    What else need be said?

  • Do you need a Tea-Bag UpSide of Your Head???

    Stay the hell off videos you don't like.

  • virtual wimp. If you think you can tell someone what sites they can or can't watch - you're as dumb as a Tea-Bagger.

  • I can't wait til warren BLOCKS your ass, so you can't vote nor comment on his videos. You're A TROLL if I ever saw one..! I bet you're realated to SmartassWhip..!!

  • OOOOUGH! BEWAAARRRE OF WARRREEN!

    Does the phrase "who gives a shit" mean anything to you?

  • If you don't give a shit, then stay the fuck off videos that your not want on..

    BAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH....!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more