Sign of the Biblical flood

[gregrutz]

You have never read a Geology book have you? It shows.

[edgemiky]

@gregrutz

Dumb ass how do you think I learned to mine?

Second Neanderthals say some may have lived passed that 30,000 year mark and as recently as 15 or 20 thousand years ago, and they lived next to humans...

Why does this seem top bother you so much?

[gregrutz]

@edgemiky yes, there were two kinds of humans on the earth thousands of years ago. How does that fit in the bible?

[edgemiky]

@gregrutz Any body can take evidence and twist it to what they believe, most scientists seem to be atheist, go ahead and follow what they imply about God.

I agree with most of what they say but not all, I don’t follow blindly without looking for myself.

[edgemiky]

Seems there was a great reason t for God to do that walterObz.

This was Enoch prophesizing Noah and the flood before the event took place.

[walter0bz]

the flood = god's extreme eugenics programme

[edgemiky]

Yes there was dust too, but when?

All the sand on the very top layer indicates to me that there was lots of water to lay down so much sand and it is prtty much every where.

When it dryed up I'm sure that there where dust/sand storms.

[NoneBeforeNoneAfter]

Take a close look at Zions national park Pictures. How can an evolutionist explain how Rock layesr were bent and twited like taffy?

Rock was once SOFT like concrete mixture then hardened. It did not stay soft for millions of years in multiple laryers. Just face it. Layers can be put donw in a very sshort time. Do you think that dust was blowing through the air and gradually layed those Bent layers? Take a look into Bryce canyon and Zions Park. Tell me that took millions of years...

[gregrutz]

@NoneBeforeNoneAfter ...evolutionist explain how Rock layesr were bent and twited like taffy?''

First, you may want to ask a geologist. You know, the people who study rocks and say there was no global flood and the earth is millions of years old.

Second, Zion is from wind blown sand, that is cross bedding you see.

Third, not all rock is from mud layers.

Forth, rock do metamorphose and they do bent under pressure.

Look at the Grand Canyon and tell me it did not take millions of years.

[Aaron518]

Is this satire?

[hunchbacked]

I am on another spot of the planet, and I see no evidence of global flood.

[edgemiky]

More of what you said, Also I'm guessing the creek foods every year, Yes you are guessing, the last flood event here at that spot I show you was in 96, and it was huge it cut the side of that hill off and exposed the giant wave.

But it did no such thing at the spot we are at now with this video.

That was a major flood event.

[edgemiky]

The layers I have shown, is the same across the country, in Florida it is an average of 12 to 15 feet but varies from 4 to 15 or so feet.

In each successive layer you can see major flood events but none are as huge as that last layer on top of the geological column.

The date of that event is from 6000 to 12,000 years.

If a rush of water came over the elevations in this area then it had to be a global event because it had to go over 3600 feet to get here.

[edgemiky]

Stand on a beach when there is a major storm event and look at what the storm does to the water and understand that the water almost looks like mud because of the suspended sand.

If what you say is true that little creek would have been the size of the Mississippi, it hasn't meandered in thousands of years. When a creek or river floods it is a jumbled mess look at the other video.

[edgemiky]

That layer that I am talking about goes from one side of the valley to the other not only that, as I traveled across the country that layer can be found where there are no creeks. I have more proof of that.

In these videos I show what the creek does when there is a localized flood event.

Look At the difference in that layer compared to what I show you.

[edgemiky]

Well that's your opinion, but when you can't spell that makes you look stupid. catfishnotyalc .]Try Googling word/dictionary, type, then hit search form your computer desk top.

Your operative words, was (probably) larger at one time.

What that creek did was cut through the layers and expose them. That s what it has done for 12 to 10 thousand years.

Its been in the same spot for that long at least.

[catfishnotyalc]

The creek caused it. This is not proof of a worldwide flood. The creek floods every year and also it was probably larger at one time. There is proof of worldwide flooding, but this is not it. Sorry man, but you just make yourself look stupid when you jump to conclusions without doing research. Its easy to do. Just type what you want to learn about at google and click search.

[catfishnotyalc]

The creek has gotten smaller over the years of its existence. Also I'm guessing the creek foods every year. Thus dispersing sand and silt. Just look at how deep the creek bed is. Common sense tells you that swift moving water from a creek caused that. There is much proof of a worldwide flood. But this does not prove anything except that it was caused by the creek that is there today.