The AIDS Trap

[curesriches]

It's a virus the same as your computer gets a "virus". Complain directly at the symptoms because they're greedy promiscuity hypocrites that are raping your energy. Their leader is bunga bunga Berlusconi. Intimate contact with another infected person is the parameter of the channel disease.

[HIVVideos]

@curesriches since when did being "infected" with non specific antibodies become an Orwellian concept to you?

[curesriches]

@HIVVideos If it's not a rhetorical question 2008

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google...The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia

" let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?

A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys)

, and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: The findings about Gallo's charges is obsolete. I have already expalined why. Yes they were dropped you fucking idiot. You are trying to argue against recorded history. It is the same as saying the 9-11 did not happen. What? Let me guess your shitty source fearoftheinvisible. First, AIDS is not a virus. HIV is the virus, AIDS is the disease that weakens the Immune system which makes you highly vulnerable to viral and bacterial infections, tumors and cancers.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao...I posted the sources you IDIOT

Investigation report finds... misconduct.. by Gallo. (Dr. Robert Gallo) (U.S. Office of Research Integrity)

AIDS Weekly

AND

INVESTIGATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO THE HIV BLOOD TEST PATENT DISPUTE AND RELATED MATTERS

Staff Report

Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastes: I wonder how far you are going to take this fallacy of exclusion. I already expalined the case. You are are just burying your head in the sand and the fact is not going to change. Fearoftheinvisable is an unreliable source and it seems they do not to know that AIDS is not a virus. False premise about Gallo. What a strawman. I did not admit that Popovic was the only one cleared both were cleared. I did not refute them because there is nothing to refute. EIA is not their product.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 YOU are excluding WHY the charges were later dropped. They changed the definition to include "intent" They could not prove that Gallo INTENDED to deceive. He dd certainly falsify is data though. The reason Popovc was cleared right away is because the scribbles were in Gallo's handwriting.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Oh wow, all of your new comments is flagged as spam. I guess people are seeing through your bullshit lol. I did not exclude anything and did not leave any part out. I clearly told you it because ORI lacked the evidence. This is all expalined in the sceince sources I presented. Gallo did not falsify data. Bring me reliable, non obsolete sources that say this. You can't because everything that you are saying is false. I think I am done with you. Anybody else want to debate?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Stop and think about that. This video doesn't have enough traffic for my comments to get flaggedthat fast. didn't post correctly and youtube spams immedately if you don;t. You left out WHAT evidence they did nothave...proof of intent. Nobody disputes he falsified data

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 You didn't "clearly" tell me why the charges were dropped. You wanted to pretend it didn't have to do with him falsfiying data. It didn't. I double checked Nbody disputes the scribbles are in Gallo's handwriting and that he lied. It had to do with a rule change.

[GreenEnergy1972]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny You are correct. It also had to do with time...The statue of limitations for prosecution was up, hence they could not prosecute him

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@GreenEnergy1972 Surely there's no statute of limitations for crimes against humanity

[GreenEnergy1972]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny No, but there is a statue of limitations for scientific misconduct. That's why they let him go. It had to do with the falsification of a scientific paper which falls under an ethics statute.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lol....ok

Now...since Gallo had NOTHING to observe or examine...HOW did he come up with the "hiv" proteins used in/for ALL the "hiv" antibody tests snce the day he got the patent?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 YOU are excluding WHY the charges were dropped. They canged the rules to include "intent". The reason Popovic was cleared right away is because the scribbles are in Gallo's handwriting. No shit Gallo didn't invent the Elisa, GALLO patented the "hiv" test though. GALLO is the one who "discovered" the "hiv"proteins. Can't you read? His lawsuit with Montagnier was over PATENT rights

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 DUH...he found GUILTY..lol omg

"One of the most remarkable and regrettable aspects of the institutional response to the defense of Gallo et al is how readily public service and science apparently were subverted into defending the indefensible

The fraud became self-perpetuating. Defending the indefensible became a reflex, until ultimately, the cover-up was so burdened with falsehoods that its collapse was inevitable.."

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google....The AIDSTruth Rats Scatter

Now that Dr. James Murtagh has unwittingly exposed the corrupt South African group AIDSTruth for what it is, the pseudoscientists are desperately trying to distance themselves from Murtagh - like rats from a ship.

... TAC regularly receives funding from the Treatment Action Group (TAG), which accepts generous funding from companies like Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb and ..."

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google....INTERVIEW RODNEY RICHARDS Why the "HIV Tests" Can't Tell You Whether You Have HIV

Dr. Rodney Richards, PhD, Biochemist, Founding scientist for the biotech company Amgen. Collaborated with Abbott Laboratories in developing some of the first HIV tests

to confirm Dr Richard's claims I have the dirct link to the test kit disclaimer on my channel under the pic of the Pope

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: I was wondering when you'll bring up the crockpot known as Rodney Richards. Biochemist? Maybe I'm having a brain fart but when did organic chemist and biochemist became interchangeable? Founding scientist of Amgen? He was just an employee there in the 80s. Maybe you are thinking of Leroy Hood. I'm not going to google that. It's just a waste of time. I have refuted all of your arguments.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Honey...calling him names does not address any of his points. He worked on the "hiv" tests which are biochemical tests. Yes...your brain farts.

Calling people names refutes nothing and his claims are confirmed by Abott Diagnostics.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: When you have "a large study of HIV testing in 752 U.S. laboratories reported a sensitivity of 99.7% and specificity of 98.5% for enzyme immunoassay, and studies in U.S. blood donors reported specificities of 99.8% and greater than 99.99% with confirmatory Western blot, the chance of a false-positive identification in a low-prevalence setting is about 1 in 250,000 (95% CI, 1 in 173 000 to 1 in 379 000)".

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Tell it to the DAs honey....Google...More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges

"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”

A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ..."

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 INTERVIEW RODNEY RICHARDS Why the "HIV Tests" Can’t Tell You Whether You Have HIV

"Rodney Richards, Ph.D.: The main problem with so-called "HIV tests" is that people use them to diagnose HIV. In fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion...........early on when we were working in collaboration with Abbott Laboratories, it was clear that there was NO GOLD STANDARD for HIV: no direct isolation of the virus.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Now to refute his there is no gold standard argument, its a lie. The Western Blot or the immunofluorescence assay which is used for confirmation and the HIV enzyme immunoassay is the gold standard. It clearly states EIA is intended to detect HIV1/2 in "HUMAN SERUM, PLASMA, OR CADAVERIC SERUM". Plasma is a component of blood which can be separated. Human serum is short for Human Serum albumin which is a protein. Cadaveric means corpse... So what is your argument?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao...honey...YOU can't refute what Abbott Diagnositcs says about their own prduct...I have the DIRECT link t he dislaimer on my channel under the Pope....

"“At present there is,,,,,, no recognized standard............ for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.” (Abbott labs HIV-1/2 test)

Lol...duh!

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: And I did not refute anything that they said. I copied and pasted what is under the pink box. Since it is evident that you do not read the source. No Popovic got cleared because the ORI did not have enough evidence. Anybody that wants to know can read this in Science Vol. 262 November 12, 1993, titled "Popovic is cleared on all charges; Gallo case in doubt". I'm done talking about old cases.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao....so you ADMIT that it was only Popovic that was cleared? So why try to make it seem as if Gallo was also?

I know you didn't refute what Abbott Diagnostics says about their own product. If that were possible the DAs wouldn't be forced to drp their "hiv" criminal cases.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao...or they can read the actual report....Investigation report finds MISCONDUCT by Gallo. (Dr. Robert Gallo) (U.S. Office of Research Integrity) Jan 1993

How is Gallo's case being in doubt the same as being cleared? Answer....duh! It isn't. Also calling scribbling out your data and scribbling in the exact opposite of your findings "Misconduct" is putting it pretty lightly.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: And now from the ORI website "In late 1993, the ORI dropped the allegations against Gallo and Popovic because, based on "new standards," the evidence was insufficient to prove their case." Which further proves that Gallo was cleared of all charges at the end of the day.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 The new standard meant that even though Gallo falsified his data and never actually found anything himself they decided proving he INTENDED to be a fraud instead of just incompetent was too hard. He had to leave the NIH though

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 The direct link is on my channel under the pic of the Pope

“At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.” (Abbott labs HIV-1/2 test,

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia

"let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?

A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)..."

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: And you are not disputing anything. Saying google this does not make it reliable. This debate should be easy for you since I have the burden of proof, right? There is evidence that HIV causes AIDS. One of those evidence is that HIV and AIDS are constantly linked together whether it be population, time, or place. Another evidence that HIV causes AIDS is fulfilment of Koch's postulates. Sources: niaid, MMWR.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 DUH! The search engine has nothing to do with it. Also...duh! maybe you should stop swallowing whatever crap "dr" jeanne hand you without question

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 more than half of Africans who qualify for an AIDS diagnosis test HIV-negative:

227 patients with "AIDS": 59% test HIV-negative (Hishida, 1992)

122 patients with "AIDS": 69% test HIV-negative (Brindle, 1993)

913 patients with "AIDS": 71% test HIV-negative (Songok, 1994)

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 DUH! Gallo never even found any such virus of mass destruction in any aidspatient. So much for the FIRST postulate as well.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Dr. Gonda "Gonda, Matthew" , the Head of Electron Microscopy at the NIH XE "National Institutes of Health" ...L Ron "Gallo, Robert" . He reports that images wanted for the Science papers, do....NOT ........contain HIV XE "HIV" (HTLVIII) as Gallo had claimed, but only cellular rubbish. This was received only 3 days before Gallo sent in the Science papers for publication, When the papers appeared in print, they still contained photos credited to Gonda, with Gallo saying they contain HIV.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

To see Gonda's letter to L Ron and his fabulous proof ...

Google....A Selection of HIV Documents Evidence of Fraud?Unearthed by US Governmental Investigations into the scientific work of Dr. Robert Gallo

Scroll down to seewhat the little shit scribbled out..."Despite intensive research efforts the causative agent of ads has......NOT....been indentified"

then he called a press conference and hit the patent office.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Virtually all AIDS patients are HIV-seropositive. So your premise does not matter. Showing papers of people having doubts from 1984 where our knowledge and evidence of HIV and AIDS is so advanced is comical. Koch's postulates is fulfilled(O'Brien SJ, Goedert JJ. 1996).

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Not true. Can't you read?

Lmao....doubts? He found NOTHING! Your study uses GALLOS tests as the foundation of the evidence. GALLO is the test kit patent holder. These are the "hiv" proteins used in/for ALL the antibody tests.... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160 .... how did he come up with them whe had NOTHING to observe or examine? Did Xenu bring them? Gallo's test doesn't prove Gallo's virus any more than an emeter proves a thetan

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Not true what? That is a false statement. But you do not seem to understand that there are already studies that agree that virtually all AIDS patients are HIV-seropositive. And Gallo was not the one from my knowledge to Isolate the HIV virus, it was Luc Antoine Montagnier and his team in 1983 which they isolated from a patient with risk of AIDS. Wow gag proteins. What do you mean he had nothing to observe? Please explain.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao....you idiot..

“We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.”

Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997

— Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: When the ORI lost on the big scientific misconduct cases, they went under fire and the ORI director at that time, Lyle Bivens, blamed the federal appeals board of changing the rules so that the most clear-cut cases of misconduct can be prosecuted successfully. But one of the big reason the investigation even took place was big media coverage and pressure from congress. And it was then that was found that the ORI didn't have enough evidence to prove misconduct.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Gallo was found guilty of grade 2 perjury. As for official misconduct....Maybe not then but Popovic has since turned the original papers over. Scribbling out your data and reversing the findngs of your study is the very definition of scientific misconduct.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: The charges included perjury, mail fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to defraud the government. The charges were dropped. Like I said before Gallo and Popovic were cleared of any wrongdoing. I am not going to talk anymore about Gallo charges which was settled in the 90s. Gallo did isolate HIV from 48 subjects[PMID: 6200936], but Montagnier preceded him. I never said Montagnier claimed to have discovered the cause of AIDS.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 NO...they were NOT dropped? Where do you get this crap?

"they scathingly concluded that, as of the 22nd February 1984, that is six weeks before these Science papers went for publication on March 30th, Gallo could not have identified HIV, since up until this date ‘no HIV-specific reagents [antibodies] were available to prove that a particular sample harboured the AIDS virus.'

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

mykoolaidtastesfunny: What does your source mean by no HIV specific antibodies? You annoy me with your unreliable sources. Hey dipstick clear the cum out of your eyes. I never said that Luc claimed to discover the cause of AIDS. I do not even know why I bother with you troll. Actually I can and Abbott did not invent EIA, which is what they are talking about. Eva Engvall and Peter Perlman invented EIA in 1971.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao...oh Really? The Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations is "unreliable"?

Also...no shit ELISA existed before Gallo decided to LIE about having discovered a deadly sex virus.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 INVESTIGATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO THE HIV BLOOD TEST PATENT DISPUTE AND RELATED MATTERS Staff ReportSubcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

" as of the 22nd February 1984, that is six weeks before these Science papers went for publication on March 30th, Gallo could not have identified HIV, since up until this date ‘no HIV-specific reagents [antibodies] were available to prove that a particular sample harboured the AIDS virus."

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 it means since he found ...NOTHING...it was IMPOSSIBLE fr him to know what the thing he did NOT find was made of.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Saying that he found nothing is a false premise. I have already explained the case. Which you even showed that you found the article, and copied a passage from it. Remember the AIDS Community: The Rebirth of Robert Gallo? Which clearly states that both Popovic and Gallo were cleared of wrongdoing. Again a show of dishonesty. Read Science mag November 19, 1993 article titled "ORI drops Gallo case in legal dispute", January 7, 1994 article "The aftermath of the Gallo case".

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 It isn't a false premise. It's a statement of fact. Don't forget WHY the chargess were dropped. You left out that Gallo was forced to share the patent money with Montagnier because....Gallo himself found NOTHING!

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 INVESTIGATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO THE HIV BLOOD TEST PATENT DISPUTE AND RELATED MATTERS

Staff Report

Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

"The fraud became self-perpetuating. Defending the indefensible became a reflex, until ultimately, the cover-up was so burdened with falsehoods that its collapse was inevitable."

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Popovic was cleared becausehe turned in the original aid papers with Gallo's scribbles. My mistake...I thought he'd turned thm over to janine Roberts. She actually got them from a journalist who got the nder the Freedom of Information Act.

POPOVIC was cleared becase it was GALLOS handwriting making the scribbles.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Also....DUH..GALLO is t test kit patent holder. Using Gallo'stest to "prove" the exstance of Gallo's virus is like using an e-meter to "prove" body thetans. He had NOTHING to observe or examine. Lucky guess my ass.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: That actually makes no sense since he blatantly says that he did isolation on the first question. And on top of that Continuum magazine is as credible as weekly world news. Continuum is known for there pseudoscientific studies. Didn't all of there editors die of AIDS? So no you are the gullible idiot that does not use reason. You said that last time and that is a false statement. You say lot of countries do but name one African country?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Honey.....looking for waysto shoot messengers des not refute anything and no...."dr jeanne"is lying about everyone dying from Gallo's cellular debris

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@freemanbrook Ha....not that you'll "reply" to that comment. No doubt you'll sneak around lik on this video....HIV [ANTIBODY] TESTS ARE A GLOBAL FRAUD.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@freemanbrook Lmao....Are You actually accusing others of your own actions Kevin?

Google.....AIDSTRUTH RATS SCATTER.....and.....Investigat­ive Reporter Files Lawsuit

There's no money in NOT selling tests and drugs t people Kevin. How long do you think you can hide? This isn't going to go on forever.

[MegasAlexandros28]

If aids was real, according to alternative medicine, mushrooms are a well known source of vitamin D- as in DEFENCE!!! so yea, it is true that the human body can destroy "AIDS".

[HIVVideos]

@MegasAlexandros28 "AIDS" is not real. There are about 12 global definitions for "AIDS". HIV numbers have been cooked up for 25 years. it's all a belief system.

[macaronimary]

prescript assist causes aids.

candida scam.

[LarysKaziukonis]

Great video, a lot of specific information handed directly. It's funny how for instance what Hitler did is repeated over and over again -e specially like in Poland where I live - people like to play 'patriotic' cause Poland didn't surrendered at the beginning of the WWII and fought. And nobody gives a fuck about the genocide that is being done in Africa and on people with "high HIV risk". Hitler at least used gas, which wasn't as cruel as destroying ones immune system with drugs.

[freddiesfavorite]

HIVVideos, thank you for this video ...

thank you for acknowledging the precious souls that were MURDERED ...

they thank you ...

[ratednine]

Are you saying that AIDS doesn't exist? If so, what happened to Rock Hudson and others who supposedly died from it?

[HIVVideos]

AIDS exists ratednine,but not as a disease or sexually transmitted syndrome."AIDS is a whole lotta other things" it's a cruel and deceptive construct created by the CDC.The HIV Industry. If you unlink all of the diseases related to AIDS they go back to their original defintion because each disease or condition has a cause and treatment of their own. No one has ever died of AIDS, mainstream advocates will tell you that AIDS is a result or the complication. "we" believe AIDS doctors kill not HIV.

[fabipuelo]

Shut up u idiots! u know nothing about this! this is true because i'm a living example of it... since 17 years... i've never took any drugs, neither my two healty sons, so, please, give this alternative a chance. thank u.

[fabipuelo]

this comment is just for 1982circaguy only, so it should be 'Shut up u idiot!!!'

thank u. = )

[1982circaguy]

HIV and AIDs are related, if you have HIV then youll have AIDs eventually. There is no concrete proof that these to two are different. That doctor is a farce and his allegations are misleading. If he was right then he would be on TIME magazine cover and our health teacher at school would of talked about this 'discovery".

[HIVVideos]

HIV/AIDS are both phoney CDC constructs... get a clue.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@HIVVideos: If you are wrong, which I highly think that you are, you are spreading a false idea that is dangerous. I think you are in denial, and you need to get a clue.

[HIVVideos]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 If I am wrong? Please keep in mind I did not come up with the "HIV" theory of "AIDS" Robert Gallo did and he was never fact checked. Before you make comments like you did, please check out the dissident perspective first. It's not uncommon to hear responses like yours, I have been battling HIV theorists for 7 years now...nothing's changed with you guys at HIV Inc.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@HIVVideos: What do you mean Robert Gallo was never "fact checked"? There is many evidence that HIV causes AIDS. Being blind to that evidence is silly. Congrats, do you want a cookie? I bet you lost all of the debates.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Google....Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers

"..... In 1993, governmental investigators determined Gallo had so poorly recorded his key and much-cited experiment that it was IMPOSSIBLE to repeat and verify it. ..."

Gallo announced the virus of mass destruction a a press conference before his papers were even published.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Googled it and no reliable sources came up. Come on Infowars, the first site says "This article is temporarily offline.", rethinkingaids? Is that all you have? Omsj? OMSJ seems like a propagandist site, and now I believe ever more strongly that OMSJ is bullshit after seeing that their Director and Principal Investigator is Clark Baker.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Honey...I don't give a shit if infowars picked up on it and I can fin it just fine. Looking for ways to shoot messegers is not scientific. All you ever get outof Gallo cultists are logical fallacies.



[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: You are not considering the source. No, I am challenging the reliability of your source. You are sadly mistaken if you think any website on google is reliable. Logical fallacies? Please explain what logical fallacies I have displayed. Who is part of Aidstruth is irrelevant. You seem confuse, nobody has challenged my claim that there is many evidence that HIV causes AIDS which is what I think you are talking about. If you are challenging then so be it.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Your'e challenging it based on what? Um....the FACT that Aidstruth is run y unqualified amateurs funded by the cmpaies whose products they endorse is not irrelevant.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: My challenged is based on reason. Infowars is a conspiracy theory propaganda site with Alex Jones a conspiracy theorist. That tends to bring reliability down. It is irrelevant. That has nothing to do with the conversation. You need to lay off the kool aid. All of those are wrong based on the flawed "Bangui definition" used in African countries with no HIV testing. It was revised with the 1994 expanded WHO AIDS case definition.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Sweetie....I already said I don't give a shit if infowars picked up on the story. They did't write it. Btw.... The Bangui Definition is the OFFICIAL World Health Organization definition of aids in Africa still to this day and lot of countries use their own definitons too. There are around 20 so....

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: I apologize infowars got it from Free Republic who got it from Rethinkingaids which is still an unreliable site. Like I said before it was revised with the 1994 expanded WHO AIDS case definition. The only time they use the Bangui Definition is if the African countries do not have HIV testing. Which HIV testing is one of the main changes from the Bangui definition. Which African countries use their own definition?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lots of countries do. James Chin talks about it in Houseof Numbers and the Bangui Definiton is still n effect..no testing required.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Why do you think Rethinkingads is an unreliable site but "dr jeanne's site o' marketing is just peachy? What have you got against actual scientists?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

It was the US Government who found Gallo guilty. Can't you read? Google....Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers

" The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper of the four was "fraught with false and erroneous statements".... a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations produced a staff report on the papers, containing scathing criticisms of their integrity.

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: Yes I read it from Rethinkingaids. And I read some of the sources they put up there. I read the ORI source part 1 and I had a hunch that I was reading outdated information. So I decided to research this more and I was right. Both Gallo and Popovic were cleared of wrongdoing.(Sciencemag 1996) This is VERY dishonest. Using fallacy of exclusion to forward your bullshit cause is dishonest. Your source using fallacy of exclusion is dishonest.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lmao...Sciencemag trumpsthe US Governmnt? I don't think so. Galo as foced out of the NIH as resultof the inquiries. Honey...he found NOTHING and falsified his data. That deosn't get "outdated"

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: *facepalm* What you do not get is this was a pretty high profiled case in the 90s. This is nothing new. Sciencemag reported on it and has no need in lying. I know you are not used to reliability in your sources. What do you mean he found nothing? That makes no sense. You are not paying attention. THEY WERE CLEARED OF WRONGDOING. Are you blind? You are not fooling anybody.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Office of research Integrity doesn't need to lie either. Popovic only turned in the orignal aids papers in a few years ago anyway.

Gallo "disocvered" cellular debris. Can't you read?

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: I never stated that the ORI needs to lie. But that does not undermine that you are trying to use pieces of outdated information and act as if it were new secret information. That is one of the dishonest tactics of the AIDS denailism movement. Cherry pick old information and bring it up as if it were new. Knowingly committing the fallacy of exclusion. I do not even think grade 2 perjury exist.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Honey....WHAT is "outdated" about the findings? 

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Dr. "Gonda, Matthew" , the Head of Electron Microscopy at the NIH XE "National Institutes of Health"......L Ron"Gallo, Robert" . He reports that images wanted for the Science papers, do......NOT...........contain HIV (HTLVIII) a s Gallo had claimed, but only CELLULAR RUBBISHThis was received only 3 days before Gallo sent in the Science papers for publication, When the papers appeared in print, they still contained photos credited to Gonda, with Gallo saying they contain HIV.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 LMAO...."The fallacy of exclusion"....you mea this artcle? AIDS Community: The Rebirth of Robert Gallo

Science 28 June 1996: 1877.

DOI:10.1126/science.272.5270.1­877

"rebirth" from WHAT? O yeah....from being founnd guilty and booted out of the NIH. Lol...are you tryng to imply Gallo made alucky guess?!? He GUESSED the cause of aids without even finding anything??

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: The same dishonest House of Numbers that used selective editing? Yes the fallacy of exclusion. Yes that article of Sceincemag. Saying the same thing over and over does not make it true. He left the NCI and helped in founding the IHV in 96' which is why it's possibly called Rebirth of Gallo. He did not guess. And I'm going to correct myself. Gallo's team did Isolate HIV it's just that Luc did it first. Who the fuck is Dr. Jeanne? Oh really like what?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Honey...he was forced out when it was finally proven that he was thief. GALLO admited he couldn't isolate anything put ofhis aids patients and Montagnier never claimed to have discovered th causeof aids. Can't you read?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 google....Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers " Montagnier, however, admitted on camera more than a decade ago that his experiments did ...NOT...purify any virus. .. includes.... a letter from an electron microscopy expert indicating that Gallo’s samples did...NOT... contain any virus, and a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could...NOT... be purified directly from human materials."

[HispanicIsNotARace1]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny: The interview with Djamel Tahi claimed to be text from an video interview. And even on that interview he says he did isolation. But like I said before Continuum is as credible as the weekly world news. Copying and pasting the same stuff relentlessly does not make you right. You are doing it ad nauseum. What points? You fabricating his credentials? It is not just an illusion. Him saying that lost him any reliability, if any, that he had.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Honey...like I said...looking for ways to shoot messengers does nothing t address the points. Monatgnier NEVER claimed to have discovere the cause of aids.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 I think you're lying about having read that article at all. You missed a lot.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Also...duh....the burden of proof is on those who mke aclaim not on those who dispute it. I don't care what "Dr" jeanne has to say about it. You dn't get to re-write the rules of logic to accomodate your cult.

If you believ in Gallo's fake virus then it's you who needs to come up with evidence and it needs to be in the form of scientific papers not logical fallacies courtesy of "Dr" jeanne the internet marketer.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@HispanicIsNotARace1 Googl....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges

"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”

A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ..."

[1982circaguy]

This reminds me of smokers always deneying the reality of cancers and health problems, and they don't listen. I don't pity them because they should know better. Same goes with having unprotected sex there is no excuses anymore. Look people if your gonna have unprotected sex have you and your partner take bloodtest BEFORE sexual intercourse!

[HIVVideos]

a Blood test for what? Nicotine levels? are you encouraging people with STD's to have sex ? Abstinence would be better don't you think? People still get germs,bacteria,and viruses while using condoms especialy local infections in the genital areas, you should be telling people who have these god awful STD's NOT to have sex.

[1982circaguy]

No you invalid, Im saying if people are going to have sex they should either wear a condom or have a bloodtest before engaging in sex. Now obviously if your positive, it will show up on the bloodtest so when you aprroach that person to see thier test either they will show you it or give a excuse. So if no test, no sex and if you have it youll know and hopefully do the right thing.

[HIVVideos]

A blood test for what? please answer the question, and something tells me you don't research much, you like to just go blab your self-righteous hear-say information to people who you know have already done their homework, something also tells me that you haven't read the NIH condom reports, abstinence is the ONLY way of having safe sex, there is no such thing as unprotected sex, you still get STD's wearing condoms. Something tells me that you haven't seen the "AIDS Truth Exposed" video here..

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Why should people make decisions about their lives using UNstandardized NONspecific tests? A spelling test has standards

"At present, there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.."

Human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2: (E. coli, B. megaterium, recombinant antigen) HIVAB HIV-1/HIV-2 (rDNA) EIA. Abbott Laboratories. 2004

The direct link to the manufacturer's site is on my channel

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

The largest and longest study of hetero transmission ever done in North America found ZERO transmission even after ten years of sex. With condoms without condoms. It made no difference. ZERO is zero however you slice it up. The entire study can be found at Helpforhiv com and You can read about it here

The Padian Waffle

&

There Will Be No Heterosexual Aids Epidemic Experts Admit

that article also has studies which tracked Tel Aviv, African and Tiajuana hookers.

&

[eden22672]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny

On top of this study is another done in a male prison. Inmates were tested for STDs.

Then after a period the same inmates were given the same tests. The only 'STD' that didn't spread was HIV. The other STDs like syphillis, herpes etc all increased. Condom or no condom, this mathematically is impossible if HIV is meant to be transmitted through sex. From the book "The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/Aids".

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@eden22672 Thanks for that. I read Dr Bauer's blog but I don't have a credit card so have not read his book. On his blog he mentioned stats from I think Maryland where the people who used clean needles got reactions on those crap tests more often than those who used dirty needles. Also inmates in South African prisons have less "aids" then the general public even with all the rampant gay sex and no condoms. It's crazy what you find when you go looking

[1982circaguy]

I guess no one has checked into reality lately. Okay then let me say this once, there is no natural cure for HIV/AIDS. People have died just from the bacterial and viral bugs they have in themselves another words youll die without medication but hey..you wanna take that chance go ahead. Just don't infect others or try to post this bullshit on internet, it says the wrong message.

[adonis1178]

hahahahaha!!!!

I think you live in a differebt world!!!!!!

Are you happy by destroying hopes?????

You seem bitter!!!!!!!

Thank God there is people that offer hope and blessing!

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

The guy who just won the Nobel Prize for "hiv" says differently. Do you have access to evidence that he missed? Send it to him forthwith

[paulagloria]

at 6:18 the implication is that there is a virus HIV yet I heard there is no molecular weight nor an electron microscope picture leading to a "certificate of purified sample" which all real viruses must have

[HIVVideos]

Hi Paula! Hope all is well. Paula "I" "we" understand this implication ,however [most] rethinkers may use "HIV" in quotations to refer to the so called Virus if it does exist at all. When some of us speak of the so called virus "HIV" i'ts only hypothetical 'as if " it may or may not exist. The division is no secret, Peter Duesberg and the Perth Group disagree about the current data to prove the existence of HIV. Luc Montagnier basically sums this up with Duesberg that "HIV" is harmless.. anyway

[paulagloria]

at 4:30 did you know that ozone destroys fungus infections and viral infections?

[HIVVideos]

no I did not know that.

[1982circaguy]

Im sorry but you guys are a bunch of idiots to believe this. The body cannot cure its self from a HIV or Aids virus no matter how healthy you are it will kill you. No one on earth has been able to beat Aids naturally and if you don't get tested you can spread the disease to others. Science has proven alot more than ignorant superstitions.

[HIVVideos]

You're in denial circaguy and you definitley haven't changed my mind with the mainstream terminology you are using.

[paulagloria]

Tenofovir/emtricitabine trademark Truvada, is a fixed dose combination of two antiretroviral drugs used for the treatment of HIV.

Is this drug related to

Zidovudine (INN) or azidothymidine (AZT) (also called ZDV) is a nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), a type of antiretroviral drug.

My friend thinks that in taking the former he is not at risk like the guys on AZT in the 80's

please direct me to more specific info on the drug's action

[HIVVideos]

Paula, most [victims] assume that the diseases they are experiencing are caused by their "HIV" this is a deceptive illusion the establishment is guilty of. These victims can open up real sexy drug ads in magazines and read the fine print but the drug companies don't list as much as the FDA has to. Your friend is in for an unpleasant surprise as time goes by,.. show your friend the link I am posting in the description box to the right for you. hope this helps. Truvada is an FDA black box drug.

[paulagloria]

"Truvada is an FDA black box drug. "

What is a black box drug?

[HIVVideos]

The black box warning refers to the bold black border which is drawn around the warning of the drug.

In the U.S. a black box warning also called a black label warning or boxed warning is a type of warning that appears on the package insert for prescription drugs that may cause life-threatening or serious adverse effects. It is so named for the black border that usually surrounds the text of the WARNING. If you open the PDF linked for you the first thing you usually see is BLACK BOX WARNING.

[HIVVideos]

A black box warning is the strongest form of warning issued by the FDA about a drug, the step taken just short of removing the drug from the market, In the case of ARV's These life-time chemotherapies will never be banned unless people wake up to this modern day genocide.

again i'll post the links about Black Box Warnings in the description area to the right.

[paulagloria]

what a treasure your site is.....I will hunt down those links

[HIVVideos]

Paula, thanks so much for your time. You may view my testimonial at WeAreLivingProofdotorg Tomas B

if you click the (more info) link top right of this video i have posted the links for you there.

Take Care

[paulagloria]

post the link but I will do it by hand for now...for others though post the link

[annie46664]

1982CIRCUSguy :) ~ Do yourself & everyone else a favour & go back to bed ~ it's evident that you need more sleep dear one.

You have to admit that, that's a lot more polite than suggesting that you "Wake up". :)

Seriously now, you do need to perform some informed research before passing such comments. Visit my playlist for starters ...

Love & LIGHT,

~South Africa~

[UhOhhhhhhhhh]

This is an excellent primer regarding the pharmaceutical scam known as HIV testing. Well done!

[hivquestions]

the politicians have made a lot of money from AIDS

[fernandoarboleda38]

beatiful

[electrictrb]

THANKS YOU !!!!!

[HIVVideos]

I am glad I was at the RA 2009 conference too! So many people that were in my life for so many years, while I stood in the shadows,

I just want to be an instrument in telling the world the truth thats all.

thanks John.

[babchameanslove]

Thank you for your service to humanity.

You are truly blessed

[HIVVideos]

Thank you

[dissidence101]

BRILLIANT !!

[HIVVideos]

DITO!