Chevy this, chevy that, Of course it was going to lose when the driver broke the one wheel wonder loose at launch, the CV was able to not only get a lead on, but it was able to keep its initial momentum up through the entire run. It doesn't matter what motor you have, if you fail at launch, you fail at race.
@kuhndog52 I,m modded compare to when i did this video so i hear all the chevy guys crying because i beat an lt1 with a modded 5.4 powered crown vic..last time i went to the track i ran 14.5 without any traction and now with the new cams and exhaust system and drag radials it sounds like a mid 13's
@kuhndog52 It's funny the way you think....you just saw a 281ci just beat a 350 ci powered caprice and now you want a non police crown vic wich is obviously way slower than the police version to race an 350lt1 powered impala wich is way faster than the regular 350 tbi caprice and you think it will be fair..
sorry to tell you but there arent any fair race in this world and since ford never produced any crown vic with at least the matching displacement of the 350 you will never see a fair race
@p71c1 oh sorry thought your car was a p71. well i mean bone stock the late 80s to 91 TBI 350s only got like 170hp either way im not a big drag racing fan. i do my racing turning to make sure all the cars capabilities are met. just remember anybody can drive almost anything in a straight line.
@kuhndog52 my car is a p71 and as for anybody can drive in a straight line it is true but drag racing is all abouth how consistent you launch and react and that takes practice
ya that caprice has the 305 in that man wrong motor and all 350s in the caprices and impala ss were lt1s THAT 4.6 Moduelar ant got shit on a 350 the only ford motor that could stack up to it is the 302 and even then it struggles to wip a stock lt1
@p71c1 i cant belive people are still talking about this dude may be a pi 4.6 will wip a 5.0 302 but i wip stock mustang gt's with the 4.6 moduler 99-2003 all the time man i got a 94 mustang gt all i have done to mine is exhaust and cai
@lionelnut69 Yeah, you're full of crap on that. Only 1994-1996 5.7's were LT1. The 7 engine code for the earlier years only had 180-195 HP, depending on the year. The P engine code is the LT1. The 1991 Caprice with the 5.7L is, as the junk yard had said, nothing more than a truck engine that was stuffed into a caprice. Gas hog, and nothing special
All it takes for a vic to take a stock caprice is a slight tune up. i got a 97 vic and i have yet to be out run by a caprice, or an impala for that matter. all iv done to mine is upgraded spark plugs and a new intake manifold. and for this other dude i dust 302s all the time but the 351 Cleavland in my homies 79 vic puts my 4.6 to shame, as well as 90% of the 350s in town.
In 1992 there was an article in the Detroit News that compared the brand new (at the time) Crown Vic Police Interceptor with the Caprice 5.7 liter police car. They said the Chevy beat the Ford in all speed tests. And I like both cars so it's not that I favor one or the other.
@88nitrousvic Get the fuck out of here! I have a 1995 impala With a 396 stroker engine inside, I also have a torque converter that pushes me at 3800 rpm.... I done won over 100,000 fucking with that vehicle! Put some cash up!
@88nitrousvic Those box vics are horrible they slower than the 1992 vic I would have to give u the car if we lined up and run u in regular drive those model vics I can walk down with ease and they break down easily they are a true FORD(Fix Or Repair Daily)
Real talk the SS Impala and The 9C1 caprices with the LT1350 corvette motor busts crown vics ass everytime I have a stock 94 9C1 with the LT1 350 with flowmaster exhaust and my boy got the 98 retired sheriff crown vic with flowmaster and I beat him everytime and he can vouch for that those 305 caprices aint got shit on the LT1 corvette motor
@YoungLarry32 the 98 to 00 vis with the non pi engine will run low 16's but the later crownvic as my stock 04 run 15.2 all day long so just tso to say that not all crown vic are capable of decent times.
Even though i will agree that the4.6 cant match the low end torque that an lt1 produce but as for a NON lt1 engine that is not a problem
@YoungLarry32 the 98 to 00 vis with the non pi engine will run low 16's but the later crownvic as my stock 04 run 15.2 all day long so just tso to say that not all crown vic are capable of decent times.
Even though i will agree that the4.6 cant match the low end torque that an lt1 produce but as for a NON lt1 engine that is not a problem
@Thilindel tell you what bring any caprice out and i will crack it ass big block small block it dont matter too me and bring 1000 bucks i dont race for free we can handle this on the street instead of talking shit
@88nitrousvic Why don't you post a vid of the 0-60, 1/4, or something useful, rather than mere burnouts? Anyone can run their mouth on here and post burn out vids. I certainly don't need to add a turbo to melt a set with my LT1.
@YoungLarry32 you and your boy know nothing. a 98 crown vic is slow as dirt. I had one. They only have 224hp. 04-up crown vics PI have 250hp. Race a 04 crown vic I guarantee it will be alot closer.
@YoungLarry32 yeah it had the caprice vett lt1 but it aint got as much power as the vett motor i had a 9c1 that shit wuldent that powerful. thaat 9c1 has lt1 had 260 hp and 330feet lb of torque. the ls1 4.3 9c1 had 200 hp stock.the vics have 250 hp stock and 260 feet lb of torque stock they both aint that powerful stock dn they sure as hell aint powerful when the police dont use em any more.
@YoungLarry32 my vic HPP CVPI shuts down 96 imapla SS's and the 9c1 lt350s and all i have is a cold air,flowmasters,and my vic is still tuned for pursuits.
@KRAZYKAT3885 nigga you lame if you think my 2001 CVPI aint going to shut down your 96 slowpala and the 9c1 caprices that 350LT1 aint 350hp my bruh im pushing close to 315hp in my vic its had alil done to her and she was a pursuit vehicle so alil more aggressive tune im running in the 13s in the 1/4 mile all day long in 80 degree weather go to my page and check her out you wont be disappointed
@p71c1 sorry the other vid didnt load anyways its a 2001 CVPI performance improved intake manifold.bbk 78mm,a custom CAI(made myself),obd2 computer(tuned),150shot nitrous,4.10s and flowmaster super 44s other than that it is stock. it has 315 est hp with out NOS to the motor and she runs 13.80 with nos on slicks
@Mr45hitman I really really doubt that you are putting that much without cams and longtube header.The list of mods you have will really wake up the car but will not give you 65hp over the 250 hp rated to get an 315 est hp.
If you run 13.8 on a 150 shot you must be running low 15,s N/A
this reminds me of me and my boy racin, Idk what year but he got that 4.3 in his bubble and i got an lx vic, i leave his ass everytime and then he finally comes rollin by after my limiter kick in
ive owned both of these cars 91 caprice classic and 2000 p71 and i have to say...the vic is badass! but the caprice has alotta potential...sn: im still driving the p71
fuck all yall a crown vic will smash any kind of caprice any day give him his props jus for owning this car i got a crown vic but i got it super charged with a performance chip and i got a police intercepter it will smash anybody
Well, really what's the point of trying to get into the B.S. over the caprice vs.the crown vic. GM has long discontinued it's Full Size Car RWD platform and now Ford will discontinue it's panther platform in 2011. What's there to get so excited about in the future there; the Taurus and the Equinox? Give me a break, I'm just more willing to pull the trigger of the gun to my head (lol).
@ss101504 In 2003, I had a 1991 Caprice with the 5.7L. It's NOTHING special in those years. Just had 195 HP. My dad's 4.6 would kick the Caprice's butt. The dual exhaust 4.6 was 210 HP. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out. However, my 1995 Impala utterly destroys his 2005 P71 (250 HP for P71's in that year). I'm happy with my caprices!
95 ss haha its prolly a clone u dick my 03 vic will smash that ass and so will the 1 from this video u c him killin everyone he races where is ur videos clown of ur heavy chevy and a tru imp stock aint fuckin wit a marauder stock which is almost a vic
I had a 95 9C1 w/LT1& G80 posi. Only mods I did was homemade cai, catback, and a mailorder pcm tune by pcm for less. I never tested the quarter mile but always tested the 0-60. Completely stock, car never did better than 7.3 sec. After mods car was consistant w/ 6.2 to 6.5 sec. 0-60. I know there are a lot of keyboard cowboys out there making stupid claims, but I honestly raced my bros '92 SHO 5spd & put almost 3 car lenths on him by the end of a long on ramp. I don't think a Vic could do that.
u beat a 305 91 caprice or sum , n u tink u doin sum, try racin my 95 ss and ull get smashed on, or even any 92 caprice wit the 5.7 or any 9c1 94 til 96, people dont understand crown vics are so slow n shity so is all fords, plz don get 2 excited
@p71c1 i own a 93 305 ci caprice. and i have to agree with everything u have said after running a few crown vics and grand marquis'. having a v8 in the 90's that can rev to 7k rpm is a real advantage against a car like mine that wants to stop at 5500. and with twice the valves, those 4.6s can seem bigger than they are. i can outrun a similar year crown vic and grand marquis, but these newer ones are quick. ppl forget its the same motor as a mustang gt. and we "B body" owners can't beat that
@captainreview17: You know that Ford just stopped making the Crown Vic and that Chevy's coming out with a new police-only Caprice next year, right? chevroletcapriceppv-dot-com
I guess Ford saw how "well" it worked for Chevy to kill the RWD V8 and replace it with a smaller FWD 6 and thought "hey, we should do that too 15 years later"...
these early 9c1's were not fast at all i had the same car! i have a 03 cadillac dts(300hp northstar) and i dont think people know how strong and fast this car is. i have beat a 95 9c1 caprice with cold air intake and another that was stock. lost by less than a fender to a turbo integra type r and beat a 1977 trans am 6.6 by a car with my friends in my car to witness it. i have also had it up to 135 mph with more to go. speedo says 155mph! lol
if i could find a cold air intake for my car,a lt1 caprice or a p71 wouldnt have a close chance.plus 5.4 is adding more weight 2 yo car. why not get a mustang gt motor?u must b putting in a cobra motor.but we all know that a saleen roush, boss ,cobra,or gt cant beat a stock ls1 vette or lt1 vette
The 5.4 is 200 lbs heavier but has lot more torque that the 4.6 could ever dream to offer.The 03/04 Mercury Marauder had the cobra engine 4.6 32v rated at 302hp and 320 lb tq.While my engine is still short of 50 hp I still can beat it on the 1/4 MILE because the marauder dosent shine under 4000 rpms.Heavy cars need torqy engine.... as I always say no replacement for displacement 5.4 for the win
race mine. 91 9c1 with vortec heads n a l98 cam-255 rear wheel horse power.any 1 who knows chevy know that a stock lo5 aint shit with 3:42 gears n no posi
sorry but this is true gm guys. i test drove both the 9c1 350 lt1 and the p71 highway patrol 281. the p71 is alot faster off the line. the 9c1 would need a mile to catch up... if it could...
wow, when i ran from a crown vic interceptor in my STOCK BUICK ROADMASTER LT1 with 2.56 gears, he didnt even have a chance ...with those gears in my car it still does 0-60 in less than 7 seconds and a 9c1 has 3.08 gears.....but of course you are probably one of those guys that thinks the "interceptor" has a different engine than a stock crown vic....it doesnt...only suspension and gears on a p71 dood
@Aliceinchains1234 good 1 and they forget chevy discontinued these heavy ass cars and made the impala a fwd v6 im positive that year to year the vics were berrter o i 4got chevy sold out
I'm a ford guy myself, but I still like Chevys. But it's pretty sad on Chevy's behalf to see their 350 get walked by a 281... what if the vic was an interceptor with a 330.... ? I mean no offence and all but seriously... if that was any kinda 350 (gearing and tires aside) it would have ate that 281 for breakfast and shit it out before lunch. I'm just saying.
My 04 vic run 15.2 in stock trim and ss used to run high 14's stock too . as you could see even if the driver would have made a good start the vic is still pulling away.
my car do not have the 5.4 engine yet but next year yes so i'll be able to take care of the lt1 without much trouble
This car is a civilian caprice 91 ( you can tell its a 91 by the black window trim ) as well you could'nt get a 350 in a civilian caprice in 91 , so this a 305 not a 350 .
i have a 91 caprice classic. its a tank. it has the 5.0 HO. it has closoe to 230000 on it and is runs fine. i put it through its paces every day. if i remember right the 91 caprice and impalas were the very last gm vehicle to be 100 percent made in the usa. every single part
all i hear is stock vs stock ima ford fan and love crown vics i cant stand when ppls chevy cant beat a ford in what ? not in a drag we got better take off than chevy so if a crown vic takes off is top notch caprice would never had a chance
Frankly, I like both the LT1 Caprice/Impala SS and the CVPI. I prefer the CVPI as an everyday utility driver but take the Impala on the highway in July.
i drive a crown vic everyday at work and they dont touch the old impala... they dont grip like the impalas, nor do they take off like one and unless your in nevada where you need to do 150mph the crown vics top end is useless
Even me as a crown vic owner i know pre 03 model are not that great performance/handling wise compare to the 96 9c1 lt1 it's just sad gm stopped the production.
they redesing the whole suspension and front crossmember.The handling is by far the best of all cv made. 03+ got knock sensor and 04 got revised maf so the timming is more aggressive. The 04 model are considered as factory freaks
I own a 1996 Chevrolet Caprice 9C1 Lt1 made custom for a sheriff in Texas with goodyear V rated tires. I also own a 1999 Crown Vic ex un-marked state car. The Chev destroys the ford in all performance aspects. Also, I feel much safer crusing at 100 mph in my chev than the ford. the ford lifts, and is much rougher a ride. Regards
sorry to say that but your 99 vic is a real piece of crap not because it cant handle your caprice but beacuse they were the worst years of the vic...no power at all ,shitty handling even the interior sucks compare to your caprice.Your caprice is by far better than your 99 but if you would try 04 model you would not be as disapointed as you are with the 99.
Sure it cant be as fast as the lt1 but wont be that far away .
I agree that the newer vic would win , even if this car really did have the tbi 350 , The MSP 2009 police cars results have the CV w/3.55 axle at 0-30 3.17 ( 92 caprice 9c1 tbi 350 3.42 axle 0-30 3.13 ) CV 0-50 6.64 ( caprice 6.57 ) CV 0-60 8.79 ( caprice 8.92 ) CV 0 to 100 23.7 ( caprice 25.8 ) so it would be pretty close .... The caprices strong points , are the 300 ft lbs of torque on the low end .
Also the top speed on the caprice 9c1 was 133 mph in those years , 0 to 100 in 25 seconds .. I would have to see the vin number of the car , and see the numeral "7 " in the 8th position ( which is a 350 ) ... although I am sure it has an "E" ...which is a 305
Ummm... this looks like a civilian caprice with a 305 ... Its def. a 91 caprice because that was the only year it was black around all the side glass , in 92 it was body color , not to mention in 91 you could'nt get the 350 in a civilian car , which I am sure this is ( look at the aluminum wheels ), you could'nt get a 350 in a civilian caprice until 93 on the LTZ , and those had the open rear wheel wells , and according to motor trend , it ran 0 to 60 in 8.5 and quarter mile in 16.6 ,
You told me to race against something comparable and you think the sts is comparable only because it has a 4.6??? STS fwd 4.6 32v twin cam 300 hp
against crown vic rwd 4.6 16v sohc 250 hp and you are still telling me that theses car are comparable??? wow i'm impress!!!
For your information i'm not posting on youtube for braggings even when i lost i post vids of it so go see my race against YES a sts last summer!!! you will see what you want maybe then you will stop to cry
im not trying to make you cry, its just that i would not be bragging about a race like this and especially posting it on youtube. How about trying to race a cadillac seville sts you both have 4.6L im sure that car will smoke you with FWD. Now if you beat that car then you can post all the vid you want, but make sure the guy you race actually knows how to drive.
the stock 350 is no match against the crown vic. i guess some ford lover just loves this vid. its like racing a stock corvette against a stock mustang. plus the driver totally sucks he does not know shit about drag racing. No im not a ford hater, i just hate ignorant people that compare two uncomparabl cars. displacment is not everything, there is more to an engine than displacment.
Ok smart ass i let every body here leave their opinion no matter if it's in my favor or not but telling me that i'm an ignorant....just a cheap shot! you dont even know who wanted to race who!!!
As i said earlier unless you race against the exact car Model/year/weight it will never be a fair race so dont make me cry.
What do you want me to tell you i will never race against another car who is not exactly like mine because you are gonna tell me it's not fair???
i find it funny that it's always the gm fans that can never admit a loss, even if there is one, i am a ford fan and i will admit we've had losses in the past
have you ever tought that not all crown vic run the same time on the 1/4 mile i have seen from 15.2 up to 16.8 all in stock form but in different package so please dont make me cry
Chevy this, chevy that, Of course it was going to lose when the driver broke the one wheel wonder loose at launch, the CV was able to not only get a lead on, but it was able to keep its initial momentum up through the entire run. It doesn't matter what motor you have, if you fail at launch, you fail at race.
davefisher24 2 weeks ago
No police chip in Crown Vics.
championshipstatus 9 months ago
@championshipstatus it's not called a chip but the pcm calibration is different from a civilian one
p71c1 9 months ago
yeah thats a TBI 350. NOW TRY VSING AN LT1!!!! bet youll get your ass kicked
kuhndog52 10 months ago
@kuhndog52 I,m modded compare to when i did this video so i hear all the chevy guys crying because i beat an lt1 with a modded 5.4 powered crown vic..last time i went to the track i ran 14.5 without any traction and now with the new cams and exhaust system and drag radials it sounds like a mid 13's
p71c1 10 months ago
@p71c1 yeah but thats modded. im talkin bone stock excusing the police chips
kuhndog52 10 months ago
@kuhndog52 It's funny the way you think....you just saw a 281ci just beat a 350 ci powered caprice and now you want a non police crown vic wich is obviously way slower than the police version to race an 350lt1 powered impala wich is way faster than the regular 350 tbi caprice and you think it will be fair..
sorry to tell you but there arent any fair race in this world and since ford never produced any crown vic with at least the matching displacement of the 350 you will never see a fair race
p71c1 10 months ago
@p71c1 oh sorry thought your car was a p71. well i mean bone stock the late 80s to 91 TBI 350s only got like 170hp either way im not a big drag racing fan. i do my racing turning to make sure all the cars capabilities are met. just remember anybody can drive almost anything in a straight line.
kuhndog52 10 months ago
@kuhndog52 my car is a p71 and as for anybody can drive in a straight line it is true but drag racing is all abouth how consistent you launch and react and that takes practice
p71c1 10 months ago
stop being a pussy im in south west philly put your money were mouth is all you do is talk
88nitrousvic 1 year ago
Ford 302 engines were chunks of shit ever since the first day they came off the line.
Hiei2k7 1 year ago
ya that caprice has the 305 in that man wrong motor and all 350s in the caprices and impala ss were lt1s THAT 4.6 Moduelar ant got shit on a 350 the only ford motor that could stack up to it is the 302 and even then it struggles to wip a stock lt1
lionelnut69 1 year ago
@lionelnut69 wow so much bad info here....
first all 350's were lt1 in caprice and impalas????...wrong!
second a 4.6 will shit on any 302 and even 351 powered crown vic
p71c1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@p71c1 they are you jackass...thinking you know everything, you need to do your research
MAEdwards2134 11 months ago
@p71c1 i cant belive people are still talking about this dude may be a pi 4.6 will wip a 5.0 302 but i wip stock mustang gt's with the 4.6 moduler 99-2003 all the time man i got a 94 mustang gt all i have done to mine is exhaust and cai
lionelnut69 10 months ago
@lionelnut69 Yeah, you're full of crap on that. Only 1994-1996 5.7's were LT1. The 7 engine code for the earlier years only had 180-195 HP, depending on the year. The P engine code is the LT1. The 1991 Caprice with the 5.7L is, as the junk yard had said, nothing more than a truck engine that was stuffed into a caprice. Gas hog, and nothing special
Thilindel 1 year ago
@lionelnut69 not all 350s are lt1s
GEARHEADGUY92 1 year ago
All it takes for a vic to take a stock caprice is a slight tune up. i got a 97 vic and i have yet to be out run by a caprice, or an impala for that matter. all iv done to mine is upgraded spark plugs and a new intake manifold. and for this other dude i dust 302s all the time but the 351 Cleavland in my homies 79 vic puts my 4.6 to shame, as well as 90% of the 350s in town.
DiamondbackSS454 1 year ago
@lionelnut69 the first year the caprice had an LT1 was 1994...
you6543 10 months ago
@you6543 no n1993
MegaSkokie 8 months ago
@MegaSkokie yea in 93 they came out in the camaro but for a caprice it was 94
you6543 8 months ago
In 1992 there was an article in the Detroit News that compared the brand new (at the time) Crown Vic Police Interceptor with the Caprice 5.7 liter police car. They said the Chevy beat the Ford in all speed tests. And I like both cars so it's not that I favor one or the other.
wolfsblood07 1 year ago
@wolfsblood07 I will agree with you on that i owned a 92 vic with 190 hp and that car could not beat the low end torque of a 350 ci engine
p71c1 1 year ago
fuck caprices my 88vic will kill any junck ass chevy
88nitrousvic 1 year ago
@88nitrousvic Get the fuck out of here! I have a 1995 impala With a 396 stroker engine inside, I also have a torque converter that pushes me at 3800 rpm.... I done won over 100,000 fucking with that vehicle! Put some cash up!
detroitondeck 1 year ago
@88nitrousvic Those box vics are horrible they slower than the 1992 vic I would have to give u the car if we lined up and run u in regular drive those model vics I can walk down with ease and they break down easily they are a true FORD(Fix Or Repair Daily)
YoungLarry32 1 year ago
Real talk the SS Impala and The 9C1 caprices with the LT1350 corvette motor busts crown vics ass everytime I have a stock 94 9C1 with the LT1 350 with flowmaster exhaust and my boy got the 98 retired sheriff crown vic with flowmaster and I beat him everytime and he can vouch for that those 305 caprices aint got shit on the LT1 corvette motor
YoungLarry32 1 year ago 10
@YoungLarry32 the 98 to 00 vis with the non pi engine will run low 16's but the later crownvic as my stock 04 run 15.2 all day long so just tso to say that not all crown vic are capable of decent times.
Even though i will agree that the4.6 cant match the low end torque that an lt1 produce but as for a NON lt1 engine that is not a problem
p71c1 1 year ago
@YoungLarry32 the 98 to 00 vis with the non pi engine will run low 16's but the later crownvic as my stock 04 run 15.2 all day long so just tso to say that not all crown vic are capable of decent times.
Even though i will agree that the4.6 cant match the low end torque that an lt1 produce but as for a NON lt1 engine that is not a problem
p71c1 1 year ago
@YoungLarry32 i was beatin LT1's with my 88vic before i put the turbo on it
88nitrousvic 1 year ago
@88nitrousvic 1988 Crown Vic - 150HP Single Exhaust, 160HP Dual Exhaust: Source, Car & Driver. 0-60 @ 10.4 sec
1994 Caprice 5.7L - 260 HP 0-60 @ 6.6 seconds.
You're so full of shit, I don't think you realize you live in a septic tank.
Thilindel 1 year ago
@Thilindel tell you what bring any caprice out and i will crack it ass big block small block it dont matter too me and bring 1000 bucks i dont race for free we can handle this on the street instead of talking shit
88nitrousvic 1 year ago
@88nitrousvic Why don't you post a vid of the 0-60, 1/4, or something useful, rather than mere burnouts? Anyone can run their mouth on here and post burn out vids. I certainly don't need to add a turbo to melt a set with my LT1.
Thilindel 1 year ago
@YoungLarry32 you and your boy know nothing. a 98 crown vic is slow as dirt. I had one. They only have 224hp. 04-up crown vics PI have 250hp. Race a 04 crown vic I guarantee it will be alot closer.
oldgateway 1 year ago
@YoungLarry32 yeah it had the caprice vett lt1 but it aint got as much power as the vett motor i had a 9c1 that shit wuldent that powerful. thaat 9c1 has lt1 had 260 hp and 330feet lb of torque. the ls1 4.3 9c1 had 200 hp stock.the vics have 250 hp stock and 260 feet lb of torque stock they both aint that powerful stock dn they sure as hell aint powerful when the police dont use em any more.
MegaSkokie 8 months ago
@YoungLarry32 my vic HPP CVPI shuts down 96 imapla SS's and the 9c1 lt350s and all i have is a cold air,flowmasters,and my vic is still tuned for pursuits.
Mr45hitman 4 months ago
@Mr45hitman Nigga you lying the vic aint fucking wit no SS... Point blank.
KRAZYKAT3885 2 weeks ago
@KRAZYKAT3885 nigga you lame if you think my 2001 CVPI aint going to shut down your 96 slowpala and the 9c1 caprices that 350LT1 aint 350hp my bruh im pushing close to 315hp in my vic its had alil done to her and she was a pursuit vehicle so alil more aggressive tune im running in the 13s in the 1/4 mile all day long in 80 degree weather go to my page and check her out you wont be disappointed
Mr45hitman 2 weeks ago
@Mr45hitman Dude there is no way you are pushing 315 and runs 13,s on a stock interceptor
p71c1 2 weeks ago
@p71c1 wait a sec who said my vic was stock? and its 13s with slicks
Mr45hitman 1 week ago
@Mr45hitman I only know 3 people that runs 13,s NA and youre page dosent say much abouth youre car
p71c1 1 week ago
@p71c1 sorry the other vid didnt load anyways its a 2001 CVPI performance improved intake manifold.bbk 78mm,a custom CAI(made myself),obd2 computer(tuned),150shot nitrous,4.10s and flowmaster super 44s other than that it is stock. it has 315 est hp with out NOS to the motor and she runs 13.80 with nos on slicks
Mr45hitman 1 week ago
@Mr45hitman I really really doubt that you are putting that much without cams and longtube header.The list of mods you have will really wake up the car but will not give you 65hp over the 250 hp rated to get an 315 est hp.
If you run 13.8 on a 150 shot you must be running low 15,s N/A
p71c1 1 week ago
this is hilarious.....
BLS2353 1 year ago
this reminds me of me and my boy racin, Idk what year but he got that 4.3 in his bubble and i got an lx vic, i leave his ass everytime and then he finally comes rollin by after my limiter kick in
1SUAV3 1 year ago
@86fordf250 hahah true that man shit on ford thats why ford didnt go bankrupt
captainreview17 1 year ago
ive owned both of these cars 91 caprice classic and 2000 p71 and i have to say...the vic is badass! but the caprice has alotta potential...sn: im still driving the p71
samsungsghd807 1 year ago
fuck all yall a crown vic will smash any kind of caprice any day give him his props jus for owning this car i got a crown vic but i got it super charged with a performance chip and i got a police intercepter it will smash anybody
lilpimp123100 1 year ago
Get smoked...Lol
bumpy105 1 year ago
Well, really what's the point of trying to get into the B.S. over the caprice vs.the crown vic. GM has long discontinued it's Full Size Car RWD platform and now Ford will discontinue it's panther platform in 2011. What's there to get so excited about in the future there; the Taurus and the Equinox? Give me a break, I'm just more willing to pull the trigger of the gun to my head (lol).
tarmac2001 1 year ago
check out the new E7 polic car.
ilshwak 1 year ago
caprice lt1 dont want it wit a 84 2 dr crown wit a 351w. how bout dat?
QannyMac3 1 year ago
305 ci 4 sure
racingchamp101 1 year ago
a p71 cant touch a 9c1 with an lt1
racingchamp101 1 year ago
i love my 95 caprice 9c1!
weaponexpert1 1 year ago
That is right :-D obama doesnt own ford lol... Silly bowtie fags.
jvires123 1 year ago
That Wasnt An Impala. That Was A 1991 Caprice. And I Highly Doubt It Had Th 5.7.
ss101504 1 year ago
@ss101504 In 2003, I had a 1991 Caprice with the 5.7L. It's NOTHING special in those years. Just had 195 HP. My dad's 4.6 would kick the Caprice's butt. The dual exhaust 4.6 was 210 HP. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out. However, my 1995 Impala utterly destroys his 2005 P71 (250 HP for P71's in that year). I'm happy with my caprices!
Thilindel 1 year ago
@Thilindel 05 p71's run mid to high 15's while the 04 like mine when stock was running 15.2 all day long ..go figure
p71c1 1 year ago
95 ss haha its prolly a clone u dick my 03 vic will smash that ass and so will the 1 from this video u c him killin everyone he races where is ur videos clown of ur heavy chevy and a tru imp stock aint fuckin wit a marauder stock which is almost a vic
drewboul86 1 year ago
I had a 95 9C1 w/LT1& G80 posi. Only mods I did was homemade cai, catback, and a mailorder pcm tune by pcm for less. I never tested the quarter mile but always tested the 0-60. Completely stock, car never did better than 7.3 sec. After mods car was consistant w/ 6.2 to 6.5 sec. 0-60. I know there are a lot of keyboard cowboys out there making stupid claims, but I honestly raced my bros '92 SHO 5spd & put almost 3 car lenths on him by the end of a long on ramp. I don't think a Vic could do that.
cristymia 1 year ago
u beat a 305 91 caprice or sum , n u tink u doin sum, try racin my 95 ss and ull get smashed on, or even any 92 caprice wit the 5.7 or any 9c1 94 til 96, people dont understand crown vics are so slow n shity so is all fords, plz don get 2 excited
jburdchevydude 2 years ago
felling a little upset?
I used to get shit from all you chevy boys.
Just read the other comments and it's all the same.
I.d like to race against you but you will find tons of excuses for your lost against my moded crown vic..
p71c1 2 years ago
@jburdchevydude get off ford's dick you chevy cocksucker
oldgateway 2 years ago
any stock 94 and up 9C1 caprice bill beat any stock P71 crown vic, this was a 91-93 caprice. so don't get too excited ford boys...
jperley01 2 years ago
any stock 04 p71 rated at 250 hp 300 lbtq will beat any non lt1 94+ 9c1
p71c1 2 years ago
@p71c1 i own a 93 305 ci caprice. and i have to agree with everything u have said after running a few crown vics and grand marquis'. having a v8 in the 90's that can rev to 7k rpm is a real advantage against a car like mine that wants to stop at 5500. and with twice the valves, those 4.6s can seem bigger than they are. i can outrun a similar year crown vic and grand marquis, but these newer ones are quick. ppl forget its the same motor as a mustang gt. and we "B body" owners can't beat that
wilkinskid1 1 year ago
Any 04+ p71 can run low 15's while 92 to00 will run low 16's.
According to a chevy guy ss run high 14's so I dont tell me that a non lt1 car can do as good as the ss please
p71c1 2 years ago
@jperley01 it dont matter friend the vic still won no more excuses
oldgateway 2 years ago
@jperley01 even wiki will tell you that 94 caprice stock is faster than a vic
racingchamp101 1 year ago
@jperley01 even wiki will tell you that 94 caprice stock is faster than a vic.
racingchamp101 1 year ago
@jperley01 haha thats why cops stopped using caprices right? lol face it dude vics are better, this video proved it
captainreview17 1 year ago
@captainreview17: You know that Ford just stopped making the Crown Vic and that Chevy's coming out with a new police-only Caprice next year, right? chevroletcapriceppv-dot-com
I guess Ford saw how "well" it worked for Chevy to kill the RWD V8 and replace it with a smaller FWD 6 and thought "hey, we should do that too 15 years later"...
dannysauer 1 year ago
@dannysauer funny because ford is already introducing the new police car just called the interceptor so looks like fords gonna kill chevy again :)
captainreview17 1 year ago
@captainreview17 hell ya you tell them the cops here in philly hate the the GM's
88nitrousvic 1 year ago
@jperley01 well at least ford didnt go bankrupt like gm did lol
captainreview17 1 year ago
Crown vic WON, NO questions asked, hands down.
GPaulDiddy 2 years ago
the caprice got baked from the jump!!!
boss347fox 2 years ago
these early 9c1's were not fast at all i had the same car! i have a 03 cadillac dts(300hp northstar) and i dont think people know how strong and fast this car is. i have beat a 95 9c1 caprice with cold air intake and another that was stock. lost by less than a fender to a turbo integra type r and beat a 1977 trans am 6.6 by a car with my friends in my car to witness it. i have also had it up to 135 mph with more to go. speedo says 155mph! lol
BLACKLACDTS 2 years ago
if i could find a cold air intake for my car,a lt1 caprice or a p71 wouldnt have a close chance.plus 5.4 is adding more weight 2 yo car. why not get a mustang gt motor?u must b putting in a cobra motor.but we all know that a saleen roush, boss ,cobra,or gt cant beat a stock ls1 vette or lt1 vette
capprycehoova 2 years ago
The 5.4 is 200 lbs heavier but has lot more torque that the 4.6 could ever dream to offer.The 03/04 Mercury Marauder had the cobra engine 4.6 32v rated at 302hp and 320 lb tq.While my engine is still short of 50 hp I still can beat it on the 1/4 MILE because the marauder dosent shine under 4000 rpms.Heavy cars need torqy engine.... as I always say no replacement for displacement 5.4 for the win
p71c1 2 years ago
hey do the lightning supercharged 5.4 swap!!! or better yet the navigator motor with a gt500 blower! or just do the gt500 motor!! lol
BLACKLACDTS 2 years ago
@capprycehoova im pretty sure the terminator cobra could being underrated at 390... and actually having independent rear
lieutenant671 2 years ago
race mine. 91 9c1 with vortec heads n a l98 cam-255 rear wheel horse power.any 1 who knows chevy know that a stock lo5 aint shit with 3:42 gears n no posi
capprycehoova 2 years ago
It wont be a fair race since I will have a 5.4with 250hp/330lbtq at the wheels
p71c1 2 years ago
where you live i will give you try for fun in my 03 cadillac dts( 300hp northstar)
BLACKLACDTS 2 years ago
i also drove a LT1 police package and a crown vic p71 and the p71 was a bit faster but not by much
neveen11 2 years ago
well the lt1 must have been pretty beat up cause no pre 04 p71 can come close to a lt1
p71c1 2 years ago
was this video with a auto Crown Vic or your manual, because your 5-speed is A LOT faster than a regular one
tadpole5555 2 years ago
yes the car was bone stock when i raced against him
p71c1 2 years ago
and the caprice did a brake stand at the line because.......?
JX426 2 years ago
sorry but this is true gm guys. i test drove both the 9c1 350 lt1 and the p71 highway patrol 281. the p71 is alot faster off the line. the 9c1 would need a mile to catch up... if it could...
Mystirsyk 2 years ago
@Mystirsyk
LOL sometthing was wrong with the 9c1 for sure. You drove.
Problem with this video is it was a damn L05 TBI 350.
Weaksacue.
killerzracing71 2 years ago
the other car was not a 9c1 just a regular car
p71c1 2 years ago
wow, when i ran from a crown vic interceptor in my STOCK BUICK ROADMASTER LT1 with 2.56 gears, he didnt even have a chance ...with those gears in my car it still does 0-60 in less than 7 seconds and a 9c1 has 3.08 gears.....but of course you are probably one of those guys that thinks the "interceptor" has a different engine than a stock crown vic....it doesnt...only suspension and gears on a p71 dood
bigmax88 2 years ago
Crown Victoria p71 interceptor does 0-60 in 8.4 seconds, thats official police statistics.
SecularTechnology 2 years ago
Yes, but whats the 60-100?
Wargod558 2 years ago
Would love to see that race with a proper launch for the Chevy.
jonzdad1 2 years ago 2
he still would have lost
p71c1 2 years ago
no the LT1 kick your butt P71's suck there so slow.
TheMuvee85 2 years ago
And this is why Ford isn't bankrupt. :D
Aliceinchains1234 2 years ago 12
@Aliceinchains1234 good 1 and they forget chevy discontinued these heavy ass cars and made the impala a fwd v6 im positive that year to year the vics were berrter o i 4got chevy sold out
drewboul86 1 year ago
@Aliceinchains1234 best comment of the year goes to this guy!!!!!
captainreview17 1 year ago
Why start with the wheels spinning?
SadieLadyBug 2 years ago
i'm pretty sure that caprice doesn't have an lt1, judging by the trim, which would make it a dog, try racing a 9C1 with an lt1
gmjunky87 2 years ago
AS it says in the video description this is not an LT1 but as per the driver a regular 350.
p71c1 2 years ago
hell yes 9C1 all the way
TheMuvee85 2 years ago
That caprice is probally a 305 not a 350.
buickman350 2 years ago
I'm a ford guy myself, but I still like Chevys. But it's pretty sad on Chevy's behalf to see their 350 get walked by a 281... what if the vic was an interceptor with a 330.... ? I mean no offence and all but seriously... if that was any kinda 350 (gearing and tires aside) it would have ate that 281 for breakfast and shit it out before lunch. I'm just saying.
PowerLiftingMenace 2 years ago
My 04 vic run 15.2 in stock trim and ss used to run high 14's stock too . as you could see even if the driver would have made a good start the vic is still pulling away.
my car do not have the 5.4 engine yet but next year yes so i'll be able to take care of the lt1 without much trouble
p71c1 2 years ago
Gotta agree with you there....350's are bad ass
scott93257 2 years ago
ya but the caprice is a big family car it's fuckin huge i like the crown vics but the caprice should have one
jeffhardyrocks95 2 years ago
SHOULD have won? What to you mean? Lol, its not an opinionated contest, it was a contest of speed. "shoulda, coulda, and woulda" don't apply here.
SLKclan 2 years ago 2
its a 1992 i would have like to see a 1995 caprice with a 350 in it now that would bee a good race
jeffhardyrocks95 2 years ago
a tbi 350 has less hp than a 4.6...lt1 would have killed it, but this is a lo5
bigmax88 2 years ago
This car is a civilian caprice 91 ( you can tell its a 91 by the black window trim ) as well you could'nt get a 350 in a civilian caprice in 91 , so this a 305 not a 350 .
mattmc8391 2 years ago
True that. Not a fair match at all. 305-LO3 only has 170hp and 255lb/ft torque. This car probably has 3.08:1 rear end making it a freeway cruiser.
dstarks80 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cadillac 5.2 North Star will smash lincoln
jeffdaniel09 2 years ago
ok and what it has to do with this video????
p71c1 2 years ago
i wanna see it lol
towncar16 2 years ago
Exactly...No Lincoln is even resembled in this video. Nor a Cadillac.
scott93257 2 years ago
crown vic all day i wanna see a town car vs a deville or seville lol
towncar16 2 years ago
i have a 91 caprice classic. its a tank. it has the 5.0 HO. it has closoe to 230000 on it and is runs fine. i put it through its paces every day. if i remember right the 91 caprice and impalas were the very last gm vehicle to be 100 percent made in the usa. every single part
robietrav 2 years ago
Ma Grand-mere est plus vite en courant a pied qu'avec un chevrolet caprice!!!!
erikbsihopnwo 3 years ago
Heum. Un fin conaisseur!
p71c1 3 years ago
all i hear is stock vs stock ima ford fan and love crown vics i cant stand when ppls chevy cant beat a ford in what ? not in a drag we got better take off than chevy so if a crown vic takes off is top notch caprice would never had a chance
dagrove704 3 years ago
Frankly, I like both the LT1 Caprice/Impala SS and the CVPI. I prefer the CVPI as an everyday utility driver but take the Impala on the highway in July.
redoctober90 3 years ago
i drive a crown vic everyday at work and they dont touch the old impala... they dont grip like the impalas, nor do they take off like one and unless your in nevada where you need to do 150mph the crown vics top end is useless
copper232 3 years ago
Even me as a crown vic owner i know pre 03 model are not that great performance/handling wise compare to the 96 9c1 lt1 it's just sad gm stopped the production.
p71c1 3 years ago
what's wrong with the pre 03 models? i jus want to know...so dont get smart pls
ampbell88 3 years ago
they redesing the whole suspension and front crossmember.The handling is by far the best of all cv made. 03+ got knock sensor and 04 got revised maf so the timming is more aggressive. The 04 model are considered as factory freaks
p71c1 3 years ago
I own a 1996 Chevrolet Caprice 9C1 Lt1 made custom for a sheriff in Texas with goodyear V rated tires. I also own a 1999 Crown Vic ex un-marked state car. The Chev destroys the ford in all performance aspects. Also, I feel much safer crusing at 100 mph in my chev than the ford. the ford lifts, and is much rougher a ride. Regards
k9ahora 3 years ago
sorry to say that but your 99 vic is a real piece of crap not because it cant handle your caprice but beacuse they were the worst years of the vic...no power at all ,shitty handling even the interior sucks compare to your caprice.Your caprice is by far better than your 99 but if you would try 04 model you would not be as disapointed as you are with the 99.
Sure it cant be as fast as the lt1 but wont be that far away .
p71c1 3 years ago
dat aint no 5.7
21majestic 3 years ago
wow after 107 comments abouth this vid i guess there is nothing else to say
p71c1 3 years ago
I agree that the newer vic would win , even if this car really did have the tbi 350 , The MSP 2009 police cars results have the CV w/3.55 axle at 0-30 3.17 ( 92 caprice 9c1 tbi 350 3.42 axle 0-30 3.13 ) CV 0-50 6.64 ( caprice 6.57 ) CV 0-60 8.79 ( caprice 8.92 ) CV 0 to 100 23.7 ( caprice 25.8 ) so it would be pretty close .... The caprices strong points , are the 300 ft lbs of torque on the low end .
mattmc8391 3 years ago
old car.. and new car..
BS105L 3 years ago
Also the top speed on the caprice 9c1 was 133 mph in those years , 0 to 100 in 25 seconds .. I would have to see the vin number of the car , and see the numeral "7 " in the 8th position ( which is a 350 ) ... although I am sure it has an "E" ...which is a 305
mattmc8391 3 years ago
Ummm... this looks like a civilian caprice with a 305 ... Its def. a 91 caprice because that was the only year it was black around all the side glass , in 92 it was body color , not to mention in 91 you could'nt get the 350 in a civilian car , which I am sure this is ( look at the aluminum wheels ), you could'nt get a 350 in a civilian caprice until 93 on the LTZ , and those had the open rear wheel wells , and according to motor trend , it ran 0 to 60 in 8.5 and quarter mile in 16.6 ,
mattmc8391 3 years ago
You told me to race against something comparable and you think the sts is comparable only because it has a 4.6??? STS fwd 4.6 32v twin cam 300 hp
against crown vic rwd 4.6 16v sohc 250 hp and you are still telling me that theses car are comparable??? wow i'm impress!!!
For your information i'm not posting on youtube for braggings even when i lost i post vids of it so go see my race against YES a sts last summer!!! you will see what you want maybe then you will stop to cry
p71c1 3 years ago
im not trying to make you cry, its just that i would not be bragging about a race like this and especially posting it on youtube. How about trying to race a cadillac seville sts you both have 4.6L im sure that car will smoke you with FWD. Now if you beat that car then you can post all the vid you want, but make sure the guy you race actually knows how to drive.
eugenegold 3 years ago
the stock 350 is no match against the crown vic. i guess some ford lover just loves this vid. its like racing a stock corvette against a stock mustang. plus the driver totally sucks he does not know shit about drag racing. No im not a ford hater, i just hate ignorant people that compare two uncomparabl cars. displacment is not everything, there is more to an engine than displacment.
eugenegold 3 years ago
Ok smart ass i let every body here leave their opinion no matter if it's in my favor or not but telling me that i'm an ignorant....just a cheap shot! you dont even know who wanted to race who!!!
As i said earlier unless you race against the exact car Model/year/weight it will never be a fair race so dont make me cry.
What do you want me to tell you i will never race against another car who is not exactly like mine because you are gonna tell me it's not fair???
Come on!
p71c1 3 years ago
didn't you race a Sts anyway?
aera6413 3 years ago
yes go see my other videos.
p71c1 3 years ago
Pourquoi quand je vais me coucher et que mon cul me pique le lendemain mon doigt sans tres bizzare????
erikbsihopnwo 3 years ago
depends what mods he had a stock 350 cant compare to a p71... stock 350 barely pushes 200hp
abas0abas 3 years ago
the 9c1 do not have the heads that the lt1 has.
Only difference is the pcm calibration.
I wont tell a chevy guy how to drive but if he dosent know that is not my problem and anyways as you can see i would have won anyways.
p71c1 3 years ago
not a fair race you got a p71 crown vic vs a stock civilian caprice, put the 9c1 in that race and kiss that ford good by
bluer111 3 years ago
dont make me cry buddy!!!
not a fair race...come on i'ts never a fair race unless you race against another car in the exact condition as yours.
Do i have to remind you the he got the 5.7 and i have a 4.6 do you think that is fair???
p71c1 3 years ago
the 9c1 is more thane just having a 350!!!
any way who races like that? you burn out then back up and then race you never start from a burn out there's no traction!!!!
bluer111 3 years ago
Other than the pcm calibration different axle ratio and heavy duty components i would like to know what makes you think it's so different
p71c1 3 years ago
i find it funny that it's always the gm fans that can never admit a loss, even if there is one, i am a ford fan and i will admit we've had losses in the past
CarsRockMySocksOff 3 years ago
wow finaly someone who think the right way
thank you very much
p71c1 3 years ago
crown victoria is relly relly power car..
don't care about them my friend ....
you re the best!!
joker11asr 3 years ago
i'm not pretending to be the best but thanks for the comments
p71c1 3 years ago
first .. i´m not a poor who try to talk my car is faster than others... i say the reality !
i have a caprice 9c1... and it runs faster than a crown vic .. i know becuase i had the two ..
i have other car who can beat all this.. a mercedes benz S600 v12 engine...
is a shot ! ... it run 0-60 in 5,9 ..
i think im i a discuss about cars.. not a competition .. when who wins is who have the faster car...
ok..
staut350 3 years ago
can you tell me where you want to bring this to????...just another useless and endless comment abouth ford vs chevy i guess
p71c1 3 years ago
crown vic beats your car it run 0-60 in 5 sec
joker11asr 3 years ago
sorry but i havent see any vic doing it in 5 sec unless there is a huge power adder on top
p71c1 3 years ago
a $100,000 beats a $28,000 car? Whoda thunk it!
wickedsks 3 years ago
i discord this !
caprice with the non lt1 is a little bit faster than crown vic...
its a fake shame !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
staut350 3 years ago
have you read the few comments left on this video??? i guess not.
p71c1 3 years ago
have you ever tought that not all crown vic run the same time on the 1/4 mile i have seen from 15.2 up to 16.8 all in stock form but in different package so please dont make me cry
p71c1 3 years ago
man crown vics are the shit i love them
all tho just about eny big body car is nice iv never owned a road master butt would like too ..
i have a 95 crown vic stock with p71 rims and tires and they don't sit around when you put
it to the floor lol!!! nice vid
Turbohaulic 3 years ago
I had a roadmaster with the lt1 in it and dual exhaust and My 190hp Grand marquis is noticibly quicker even though the roadmaster had 260 hp.
Lumotaku 3 years ago 2
we have to admit that the roadmaster must be few hundreds pounds heavier too
p71c1 3 years ago
I cant say that im going to look it up but a few hundred pounds wouldnt make up the difference of 70 or 80 hp.
Lumotaku 3 years ago
i'd love to see that race done properly against an lt1 powered b-body. i know the results would not be the same.
94b4ucaprice 3 years ago
NO kidding!!!! i would have never been able to figure this out by myself....obviously you are not the only one who is crying for that!
p71c1 3 years ago
So? It was still a 350ci vs a 281ci. No excuses.
iceguy2003 3 years ago 2