this was a horrible cover, i found it too slow and experimental (you would have to be high to enjoy this). To the songs credit it was a bold idea to try out, it just didn't pan out.
@raptothecore this is a parody, they weren't taking the song seriously at all because the song is ridiculous. i don't mean to potentially insult your tastes, but i don't know why anyone would want to seriously cover a song as lame as sexyback.
@whimzeejmachine No, I got the point. Parodies are supposed to serve as a mechanism to add laughter. I think when an artist covers a song they are supposed to add to it. In the case of a parody it is supposed to to comedy. If that is what they are trying to add to the song then in my eyes they failed to do this.
@raptothecore not really, what about sarcasm? there are many comedic devices other than singing the lyrics in a funny voice or saying "poop" a whole bunch of times.
and for the record, i was laughing when i listened to this.
@whimzeejmachine if it made you laugh then good, not everyone shares your oh so high brow sense of humor. look if you want my opinion on hilarious covers i would tell you to check out the gin and juice cover of the gourds or Richard Cheese's cover of chop suey. I find it hard to laugh at something so slow.
@raptothecore cool man, sorry to be breaking your balls over this, these guys are just one of my favourite bands. if you didn't enjoy it then that's totally cool.
Best shit eva.
illgrantyou3wishes 1 year ago
OMG!!!! LMAO XDDDXDDXDD
KissaKiller 1 year ago
this was a horrible cover, i found it too slow and experimental (you would have to be high to enjoy this). To the songs credit it was a bold idea to try out, it just didn't pan out.
raptothecore 1 year ago
@raptothecore you obviously missed the whole point of this cover...
whimzeejmachine 9 months ago
@whimzeejmachine which was?
raptothecore 9 months ago
@raptothecore this is a parody, they weren't taking the song seriously at all because the song is ridiculous. i don't mean to potentially insult your tastes, but i don't know why anyone would want to seriously cover a song as lame as sexyback.
whimzeejmachine 9 months ago
@whimzeejmachine No, I got the point. Parodies are supposed to serve as a mechanism to add laughter. I think when an artist covers a song they are supposed to add to it. In the case of a parody it is supposed to to comedy. If that is what they are trying to add to the song then in my eyes they failed to do this.
raptothecore 9 months ago
@raptothecore not really, what about sarcasm? there are many comedic devices other than singing the lyrics in a funny voice or saying "poop" a whole bunch of times.
and for the record, i was laughing when i listened to this.
whimzeejmachine 9 months ago
@whimzeejmachine if it made you laugh then good, not everyone shares your oh so high brow sense of humor. look if you want my opinion on hilarious covers i would tell you to check out the gin and juice cover of the gourds or Richard Cheese's cover of chop suey. I find it hard to laugh at something so slow.
raptothecore 9 months ago
@raptothecore cool man, sorry to be breaking your balls over this, these guys are just one of my favourite bands. if you didn't enjoy it then that's totally cool.
whimzeejmachine 9 months ago
@whimzeejmachine it's cool, also I wish more YouTube users could act like you and not be complete trolls.
raptothecore 9 months ago 2
Seriously? Four likes to three dislikes? What is wrong with this world?
rome8180 1 year ago 2
XD Okay, this is definitely something different.
TackyRackyComixNEO 2 years ago
You like it? I like it much better than the original.
okcallmegoddess 2 years ago 5
Agreed.
TackyRackyComixNEO 2 years ago