Well it would be kind of hard for him to know his great grand father when he died way before he was born and like i said he was never told of him at that time but he kept saying mommy a man keeps talking to me my fiance even heard him talking to him but my fiance never thought anything of it and dismissed it as an imaginary friend until she was looking at a family album and marcus my stepson said mommy thats the man that talks to me his name is t bone
Gnomefro No its not wishfull thinking or lies lots of people have near death experiences some dont even people who dont believe in god have them so it has nothing to do with religion. And i said my stepson was not told about his grandfather but yet when he was shown a picture from a family photo album he said mommy thats the guy that talks to me his name is t bone which was his nick name now how can a three year old at the time fabricate something like that
@cjguitarist100 Do you know how to use the reply system? They aren't necessarily getting your responses if you don't hit the reply button, and I am getting them. It's annoying for me, and unfair to them.
And if there is no god or afterlife how do you explain near death experiences. Even children who have no understanding of god or death but they still see the other side. Just like my stepson who seen his dead grandfather and described him to a t with out even knowing of him he would say to my fiance i saw a guy then one day my fiance was looking through pictures and he was in them and my stepson said mommy thats the guy i see his name is t bone and that was the nick name of him explain that
@cjguitarist100 "And if there is no god or afterlife how do you explain near death experiences."
A combination of biological processes, lies to get attention, and wishful thinking - both on part of the person claiming to have had the NDE and the people interpreting what he's saying.
To take your stepson, you for some reason think it more likely that magic is real than that your stepson actually knew the guy on the picture without your knowledge.
@cjguitarist100 Anyway, it's also quite telling that people who have NDEs always seem to have experiences validating the cultural superstitions of the area where they live.
With regards to children it's also important to realize how easy it is to produce answers by leading questions. The pitfalls here are profound and well documented in the psychological literature.
Just like when you refine oil to gas you get brine water which is not gas or oil its a conversion of the two just like when the energy combines with the electrons and neutrons and so forth to make light the bi product of the two mixtures
Like light being energy when its not you can create light and destroy it so there for it can not be energy because energy cant be created or destroyed only converted and light is a conversion of energy not energy itself energy is the cause of the lights existence other wise light would always be with out a source if light was energy it would not be able to be created or destroyed which it can
it seems like im the only one talking all you come up with is ideas that can easily be destroyed. I give explanations and evidence as to why somethings dont happen the way you want them too
And i am discussing and yes i am capable of undestanding seems your not or you wouldnt give up your just not liking what im saying and its not going in your favor thats why and now your out of ideas and so forth. If you cant hang with the big dogs stay on the porch in other words shut your mouth if you dont want people to talk about this shit im debating thats what this is intended for
Whats wrong cant you take the truth because all the shit your saying i can easily disproove. And now all you can say is stop spaming my channel ya thats the evolutionists way of getting out of things when he is stumped and cant come up with any explanation to contradict what i just said so be a man and stop saying i dont understand when i do. I mean after all you put it out there to debate didnt you but now your shut down and cant think of any other bullshit to put out there
caused it. We dont say because of evolution we discovered medicine we say because of technology we discovered medicine and how the body works so this has nothing to do with evolution. Thats just evolutionists way to further spread their fairy tale by saying everything all of a sudden has to do with evolution and it dont its the discovery of medicine and how the body works and what is not suppose to be there
And no evolution is not why we discovered medicine its called technology and understanding if the field of medicine was not around we would not have these new medicines so there for it would not be evolution that caused it tecnology is responsible some diseases were around just like everything else that dont mean it evolved its just that we started observing the body and how it works and what aint suppose to be there with out exrays and microscopes we would not know that its not evolution that
@cjguitarist100 Could you stop spamming my channel please? It's clear you aren't interested in discussion, and even if you were, are rather incapable of understanding the concepts you're speaking of.
Well of course you can find heavier rocks on top of small rocks that prooves nothing. Its all how the rocks landed or if they eroded or broke from the heavier rocks mostly when your digging you get small rocks on top then when you get deeper the rocks get bigger but this prooves nothing that does not diproove a flood at all because smaller rocks can be burried by water faster than a bigger rock it takes more force to burry a bigger rock than it does a smaller one so there for you get smaller
The only reason light can not be energy is because light can be created and destroyed energy can not so light is a bi product of energy kind of like when you refine oil into gas you get a brine water a bi product of the refinig
And how could that atom that exploded be there when there was no stars around to create it the explosion of stars is what makes all the elements necessary for all to exist the stars are what made all the elements needed for life and made the atoms so with out stars there could not have been atoms
Honestdiscussor you have no idea what im talking about i said nothing about what you are talking about i did not say anything about nothing from nothing
Its a law of physics if an object is turning clockwise and if thrown off an object will remain turning clockwise. Just like the tire of a car if the vehicle is moving forward and the tire comes off it will keep moving forward and not go backward
And besides the big bang is a theory not fact just like evolution if the big bang exploded clock wise and theres planets spinning counter clockwise how is that possible when all the other planets spin clockwise
And as far as the organs go we need them to to take toxins out of food and to battle against infections and diseases when you remove any of these organs you become more prone to getting theses diseases and toxins our appendix helps take the poisons out of greens that we eat and our kidneys take the bad toxins and bacteria out of our urine so it does not get in our blood and aids in digestion and cleaning of the blood
Its like they say we dont need our noses but we do with out your nose you would not be able taste or smell and most of all you would not be able to breath while you are eating or drinking because your only air passage would be obstructed and you would choke and when you fell asleep you would suffocate because most people sleep with their mouths closed and also oxygen gets to the brain faster through your nose then your lungs because it has to go through a chemical change to get in your blood
Because as a sperm we need that tail to swim to the egg and in all animals that tail becomes the spine of that animal you can clearly see that through ultra sounds all the things that humans and animals have are there for a reason not because of evolution
And as far as the whole tail thing is concerned the only reason we have tail bones is because as a sperm we had a tail why do you think all animals have them some keep growing because those animals need them ours stopped because we dont need them but sometimes the dna that shuts that off backfires and dont shut off called a slight variation or mutation not evolution all animals have tails because of the sperm cell not because of an ancestor
And if the dirt itself built up like that by itself there would be no mountains but we know thats impossible because of wind and rain erosion so there had to be a major flood in order to make that kind of geological formation
And dust and wind could not have burried all that stuff by itself its impossible thats just like taking a big glass of water and dump dirt in it and watch how the different types of sediment settle just like the geological sediment
Well how else would you explain trees growing through rocks it does not happen and how else would all those things get buried like that including ones that were eating or giving birth and how else would the bones get down that far with out being barried by a flood and wood would not be burried that way because wood decays very fast it would take millions of years for things to get buried like that on its own if its even possible giving rain and wind erosion
@cjguitarist100 You have no idea what you're talking about. The Big Bang doesn't talk about "something from nothing", it references the expansion of an already existing singularity.
@HonestDiscussioner also according to great pschysist nothing may not exist in psychics,( quantum flcuktualtion)- Steven krauss- a universe from nothing. you should read it. he explains that the term nothing doesn't exist because quantum fluctulation doesn't allow it to. all you need is absolute nothing for quantum flcutuation to take place. he explains it well and it fits together nicely also he is a professional on this stuff.
Transatlantic No dna does not allow new species to come from other species the species all animals and humans produce are all the same species a human makes a human a dog makes a dog and so on a dog dont produce a cat its genetically impossible all species that bare young are all the same species of its kind not totally different a slight variation which dna allows but it does not allow a new species because it stops after so long
Transatlantic No dna does not allow new species to come from other species the species all animals and humans produce are all the same species a human makes a human a dog makes a dog and so on a dog dont produce a cat its genetically impossible all species that bare young are all the same species of its kind not totally different a slight variation which dna allows but it does not allow a new species because it stops after so long
Transatlantic No dna does not allow new species to come from other species the species all animals and humans produce are all the same species a human makes a human a dog makes a dog and so on a dog dont produce a cat its genetically impossible all species that bare young are all the same species of its kind not totally different a slight variation which dna allows but it does not allow a new species because it stops after so long
No evolution is not from reproduction Dna only allows slight variation not a totaly different species if that was the case im sure some animal like a horse or something would have evolved by now but all animals are still the same species. Evolutionists like to say shit like that when their other original theory does not work or add up so then they say something else caused it thats typical of them there is no proof of evolution but every body keeps calling it fact when its not and any true
Transatlantic. Why do you think everybody wants to save the bee population including the honey bees with out bees plants would not be able to pollenate therefore they would not bear seeds and wont grow there i said it again ITS NOT EVOLUTION
And about the dogs yes all dogs came from the wolf but their all dogs and the only reason we have so many breeds is because humans made them not evolution their all the same species
transatlantic your stupid question about how do you explain plant speciation with out evolution your a moron seems you want to know the answer your self thats why you keep asking that same question if you dont know it when ive told you and im sure other people told you if you know then why ask just goes to show you dont know its called pollenation by bees not evolution with out bees no plants would grow duh
And its funny how god the creator needed a creator when energy its self did not need a creator according to science energy can not be created or destoyed only converted which is what i was mentioning about light being an after effect of energy light itself is not energy because energy cannot be created or destroyed only converted. And if energy dont need a creator neither does god because god him self could be that very same energy
transatlantic no light caused from energy its an after effect of energy. Light can be created by electricity the source of that light is electrons thats the energy light its self is not energy. And i said most scientist not all agree that the big bang is impossible i seen that on the science channel and in science magazine
@cjguitarist100 Ehh . . no. The vast majority of scientists accept the big bang as the best explanation of the evidence. You're going to have to do better than "a unnamed science magazine" if you want to say you've backed up your statements with facts.
well plants speciate just like humans we speciate by mating with someone not related thats how you speciate and plants speciate through pollination not evolution a be takes pollen from another plant and takes it to other ones
@cjguitarist100 I asked translantic how plants and trees evolved before the insects required for pollination existed. He said, "It's called CO-evolution" HAHA, yeah sure, cause scientists are constantly finding fossilized bees with unevolved wings, but they could still fly and take care of this pollination required for his Magical speciation of plants and trees to still happen. And he wont tell me why elephants haven't evolved into something other than a mammal in 44 million years!!
The dna shows its impossible and any good scientist would tell you that they really dont have evidence only speculation so with out evidence you cant have fact
Evolution is not fact or it would be called fact of evolution not theory so stop the bullshit it is not fact and never will be because it never happened its impossible
Natural selection is all bullshit we aint going to change from one species to another because we want to if that was true boy i would be a different kind of human what a bunch of bull shit. All that is true is your born with what you have and like it. So if i want to naturally select living in a tree i guess i will grow a tail and walk on all fours again what crap
Okay what are these mechanism that dont need a creator give the evidence as to why it dont need a creator and tell me how it got there if it was not created
@cjguitarist100 "Okay what are these mechanism that dont need a creator give the evidence as to why it dont need a creator and tell me how it got there if it was not created" are you claiming a creator needs a creator?
The talk about parent to an offspring being evolution is stupid now your throwing shit out there thats just evolutionists way to get you to believe their fairy tale thats like saying taking a shit is evolution no having a baby is not evolution evolution is a change from one species to another because that newborn baby still has the human gnome. Now if that parent gave birth to a horse or something then i would believe in evolution. But untill then its bullshit and always will be
@cjguitarist100 "Now if that parent gave birth to a horse or something then i would believe in evolution. "
Actually, if that happened, that wouldn't be evolution, that would be magic.
For starters, think of the Canis genus for example, wolves, domestic dogs, African wild dogs, jackals, coyotes. Domestic dogs came from wolves, but you won't expect a wolf to give birth to Jack Russell Terrier, but they're are distant relatives. Do you need to see a wolf give birth to a dingo?
transatlantic. What the hell are you talking about plants are related to their own species and just like humans they have an ability to become immune to stuff thats not evolution
@cjguitarist100 actually there has to be a creator-creator to give that creator information, and there needs to be a creator-creator-creator to give that creator-creator information, etc
Because if not how would we know how to talk and speak english spanish ex. We had to be taught what to eat and not eat we did not naturally select it life runs off of being taught learning not natural selection
transatlantic. What the hell are you talking about water coming up and watering the plants from underground thats just stupid now your implying that the earth has a mind and had to water its garden everynight no it didnt work that way. And besides that natural selection is bullshit too im gonna start naturally selecting a bigger head and see what happens i bet it will never happen as babies we have to be taught how to live not naturally select it there has to be a creator
How do you know that mass floods are impossible can you prove them to be impossible and its funny you should mention the ark because it was found right where the bible said it would be
@cjguitarist100 Mass floods are not impossible, its just that a world wide flood didn't happen. There's no record of such an event in the geological layers, despite claims to the contrary, and there's certainly no DNA evidence that all of the species on the earth were down to a few pairs. You can see when populations drop to low levels, like what happened to the Cheetah population, but that doesn't happen overall.
@cjguitarist100 Most are neutral actually. Some are bad, of course, and when they are bad those organisms die out in favor of the ones without that bad mutation. However the ones with good mutations are more likely to pass their genes on, and this is how natural selection works.
to junglejardon. how do you explain different species in the genome when our dna only shows same species and our dna allows for slight variation not new species its scientifically proven. And besides mutations are not evolution because its still the same species its either becase that part of the dna fired in a different order or it never shut off like it was suppose to which is called a slight variation which in a sense is a mutation either way its the same species not different
@cjguitarist100 Evolution happens over time, it's the accumulation of mutations. Did you even watch this video which is designed to dispel this very myth?
If the big bang is true there absolutely had to be light because light is an after effect of energy and energy always was. But i dont really believe in the big bang because of the atom the atom could not have been around before the big bang because the materials to make all we see now only came from stars exploding so there for with out stars it is impossible to have an atom
@cjguitarist100 Complex atoms are formed in stars, but not hydrogen, which is what stars are formed from, mainly. You didn't research this at all did you? At least not actual science research.
Well ironman. The big bang theory itself is flawed because scientists themselves say it is unlikely that it happened because the heat generated would have killed anything that would have or been able to live and the force it created would have imploded everything in on its self crushing it to nothing
@cjguitarist100 "The big bang theory itself is flawed because scientists themselves say it is unlikely that it happened because the heat generated would have killed anything that would have or been able to live and the force it created would have imploded everything in on its self crushing it to nothing"
This is just wildly inaccurate. The scientific community claims the Big Bang is as proven as anything can get in science. Life on earth didn't begin until billions of years after the big bang.
@cjguitarist100 Inbred only applies when your DNA is too similar. You can have 1st cousins even (not always) that are genetically dissimilar enough to have children without a high likelihood of genetic complications.
@cjguitarist100 Really? Then how come we still have the DNA for tails? The DNA is deactivated, so it doesn't show up, although in rare cases it get switched back on and people grow short tail stubs, but this sorta shows you need to do a bit more research.
How are we proof of evolution there is no evidence at all that we evolved. Evolution is nothing but a speculative fairy tale which has no proof. And besides all that it was scientifically proven that dna can not allow a species to change entirely different. And also dna is the blue print of life if we did evolve it would be recorded in our dna from when the first thing evolved which would be the single celled organism thats how far back our dna would go but it dont
@cjguitarist100 Is this really what you did on your New Years Eve? Very well.
What do you mean there's not evidence we evolved. Evangelical Christian and geneticist Francis Collins claims that the DNA evidence ALONE is enough to show we evolved, without any fossils. Truth is though, there's a plethora of fossil evidence which shows a clear transition between traditional apes and mankind.
When the big bang started expanding, and at the time it was the size of a bowling ball, was there any light happening at the same time in this expansion?
@ironman197268 Not sure, but I do know it was very hot. Why don't you talk to someone who actually specializes in physics? After all, it seems you believe these questions are stumpers for even the most knowledgeable physicist. If they aren't, then they really aren't a problem for the big bang theory, so why not put it to the test, walk or drive over to the best university within distance of you, and schedule a meeting with the physics professor?
@HonestDiscussioner If you KNOW it was very hot, then how are you not sure of it containing light at the same time? And You are the one asking questions here, and I'm giving you answers. You should change the name of this video to...Questions for Physicists.
@ironman197268 If you are not asking a question, why did you end your inital post on this thread with a question mark? We know it was hot due to the fact it contained all of the energy in the universe, which is really hot. I won't rename my video "questions for physicists" because the video has nothing to do with the big bang. You brought that up that topic all on your own, possibly because you feel you have a stronger case with that. You do not.
Science is assuming that Andromeda is 2.5 million light years away, they have to be because they get this distance based off the assumption that the speed of light has been traveling 186,000 miles per second consistently. The speed of light has been observed to be slowing down (Astronomer Berry Setterfield) so it used to be going faster. That would mean the light got here a lot faster, if it even had to get here. The light has always been here, God stretched out the Heavens, Isaiah 45:12.
@ironman197268 Setterfield used centuries old numbers that were procured through outdated methods, leaving out similarly outdated measurements which showed an increase in the speed of light, and then compared them to today. Measurements in the past 60 years or so show no decrease in the speed of light.
@HonestDiscussioner If what you're saying is true then the Big Bang had to expand billions of times faster than the speed of light, and NO light existed in this Magical expansion. Then about 13.7 billion years ago this expansion, absent of light, traveling billions of times faster than the speed of light, slammed on the brakes and slowed down to about 200,000 miles per hour, and then turned on all the lights. cont...
@ironman197268 Why exactly would the big bang require the expansion to go billions of years faster than light? I don't think you really understand the theory.
@HonestDiscussioner I understand it just fine. According to what you believe about the speed of light, my interpretation of the Big Bang is what you would have to believe in order for those galaxies to be as far away as you, and the scientific community claims. If not, when did the light start traveling?
@ironman197268 I don't think you did your math correctly. Nothing is so far away from us right now that it could not have gotten as far as it did in 13.7 going only lightly less then twice the speed of light, relatively. Things can move away from other each other at faster than the speed of light, due to relativity. For example, if I run away from you at 5MPH, and you run away from me at 5MPH, our relative velocity is 10MPH.
@HonestDiscussioner Well then show me were I did my Math incorrectly, if I even did any math at all. So if something out there is 14 billion light years away we should see it, even though its still billions of light years away according to Magical light speed and Earth age fiction.
@ironman197268 Well we should be able to see it if the light is bright enough to reach us that far away, through a telescope in outer space. Our atmosphere blocks most of our vision of stars. The problem you're having is that it may be more than 20 billion light years away from us right now, but the light your seeing from it was emitted when it was far closer, as the light took a long time to travel to us. To my knowledge there's nothing we currently see that we shouldn't be able to see.
@HonestDiscussioner And that light traveled through space for billions of years without being interrupted by other gravitational forces such as other stars and planets.
@NBM397 Your link is useless. All it did was take me to c"dumbass"k007's stupid channel. Please do NOT send me any meaningless Lies, Garbage, and useless, links, from that Lying, Godless youtube Loser!!
@NBM397 OK, I just looked at his Crappy channel and could not find any information about the lack of Helium in B type stars. If the BB is true then Why are those stars not dripping like a wet sponge with Helium?
I took you challenge and here's what I came up with...
You took a very short look at a video channel, and because it doesn't address in text what you think it should, therefore the big bang didn't happen. Well done, you're a perfect example of a creatard.
In other words, why would Helium in B type stars be "dripping like a wet sponge"? Seriously, are you really that daft?
Oh, who am I kidding, of course you are serious: You believe the universe is less then ten thousand years old.
@NBM397 Daft? What kind of Stupid word is that? Please keep on making assumptions about what I've done. I have viewed that channel Numerous times, and It just keeps on getting Stupider!! I'm sending you an article that destroys millions of years, and I would LOVE to hear you thoughts on it.
Just because you're not familiar with a word doesn't mean it's stupid. Look up the word, if you're having trouble comprehending it.
Apparently you haven't watched it, but only taken note that he is "godless". I have seen the link I don't even know where to begin. It's so daft it's not even wrong.
@MrDaft Trust me, I've heard that word before and it's nothing but a bunch of wishful thinking when somebody applies it to what I'm saying.
You're in the biggest form of denial, or you didn't understand that article. And now you're going to force all of your followers to do the same thing if they choose to read it.
Did Mt. Everest Hit the Pause button for Erosion and Decay, when it started it's 50 million year long Uplift from a Seabed, and that's why marine life is found on its top today?
4) Erosion happens at different speeds, depending on the place and the materials.
5) Mt. Everest has sea bottom on it, because the layers aren't pushed up while staying horisontal.
6) It seems you don't believe in tectonics either, and you wonder why I linked you to that playlist of why young earth creationist must also deny gravity.
Oh, I forgot: You obviously hadn't heard the word, or at least you didn't understand it, hence your need to point it is "stupid" and apparently awkward as well. You really are ignorant, and you're obviously proud of it.
@NBM397 My comment on CDK007's channel: Think about it - That is a great video, thanks. And thanks to NBM397 for pointing it out. I was already subscribed to CDK007, but had not seen this earlier work. Sincerely.
@csnowutube Was Charles Darwin refuted years ago? Why not? If the theory of evolution is true, then where are all the theme parks with the "Hominid Works" on display?
Please skip your Crap talk about how Rare fossilization is, I'm talking about Skeletons. And if dinosaur skeletons are found, then Hominid skeletons should be easier to find than dirt.
@angelajaynemartin Yeah right!! please dream on if that makes you happy. Show me a video slide show of these "pre-human" skeletons in a museum. And don't go giving me your pathetic Crap talk excuses like, Oh museums don't allow cameras. If evolution was true there seriously would be Theme parks displaying the evidence, and there isn't, only excuses.
@ironman197268 google homonid skeleton/fossil and go to the image page. I'll save you from your first trip to a museum and myself wasting time since you won't look at what I do anyways.
@1n354a I shouldn't have to google anything about the history of Hominid existence. If evolution is true they should be as obvious as monkeys. And I'm not saying humans evolved from monkeys so calm down!!
LOL, do you do math the same way? Oh, it should be be obvious what the hypotenuse is, if math is so correct. I wouldn't have to know how to calculate it or anything else. If it's true, then it wouldn't need any evidence.
What a retarded response, Ironman. I bet you're a "one-book man".
@ironman197268 Was Darwin refuted? Not that I know about. His work has been added to and we know he was not exactly right about everything he said, but no one has come up with anything better yet. Evolution is true. The theory explains it.
Theme park? Darwin's theory does not predict those. A museum or archaeology site would be as exciting to anyone interested. There are many of those.
If a skeleton does not fossilize, it turns to small pieces and makes up part of the "dirt".
@csnowutube Hey Man, you can share your delusional thoughts with somebody who cares, cause I don't. Nothing you say makes a Lick of sense. You're trying to make up a calamity to confuse the people that are interested in believing, into NOT believing!! Where are the Hominid skeletons? Real ones?
Why can't you explain Plant speciation w/out using evolution theory?
oh right: because there is NO OTHER explanation for the phenomena where a species originates another species by means of random mutations and natural selection.
fuck off and go read the Dover trial notes, you ignorant fuck.
@transtlantic Are you So lazy, you can't hit two extra keys on the keyboard to spell out the word "without" or do you just do it to feed that little insecure famished attention monster that lives in the part of your brain that skips like a scratched record?
For the fourth time, A Plant is a Plant, speciation is NOT EVILution. Go create a plant from nothing and video tape it Evolving into new species and I'll give you question a little more consideration.
uhm....I notice you remain unable to explain Plant speciation w/out using evo theory.
A "plant" is not the name of any species. An elephant is a mammal, and it's kids remain mammals, yet they are not humans. Why? because individuals are classified according to taxonomic rules. Speciation IS evolution. TRY explain it WITHOUT using evolution. I dare you. you dumb shit.
PUBMED- Plant speciation, search bar: Over 100,000 peer reviewed papers on SPECIATION
@transtlantic "An elephant is a mammal, and it's kids remain mammals"
Really? Well they've been running around the Earth for 55 million years now, When is evolution going to turn them into something other than a mammal? It didn't have a problem turning a T Rex into a Swallow did it? Now explain reptilian scale to bird feather evilution w/out using Creation.
@ironman197268 Are you ok? I asked you one question about someone you mentioned and now you are going off on all these different tangents. I don't claim to be an expert in any of these subjects, just an interested reader. Did you , or did you not mean "Barry Satterfield?" thanks.
@csnowutube Dream on sucka!! Just like 80 million year old dinosaur bones didn't fossilize. Not only that, they didn't even make it to the point to where all the soft tissue inside them decayed.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
@Mogley52 Creationist scientists are biased, I would strongly discourage using this site on any valid scientific matter for everyone. If you do not believe me go and check out how much scientific papers they churn out in peer reviewed magazines. I think they even created their own peer reviewed magazine just to extend their hoax. They don't do anything there except political lobbying.
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
@Mogley52 Correct there is no conscious selection by nature. Natural selection has no goal in mind other than that the best version is the most likely to spread his genetic material. Indeed evolution by natural selection is indeed valid to explain the diversity of life not the origin of it. What exactly are you trying to infer with this spam?
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
@Mogley52 A slight change is muscle location is normal. That is the reason why etheopians can run far better than the average European or American joe as their body structure is better suited for running. What the fuck are you spamming about?
ok then i will reply to them my appologies
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Well it would be kind of hard for him to know his great grand father when he died way before he was born and like i said he was never told of him at that time but he kept saying mommy a man keeps talking to me my fiance even heard him talking to him but my fiance never thought anything of it and dismissed it as an imaginary friend until she was looking at a family album and marcus my stepson said mommy thats the man that talks to me his name is t bone
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
No one ever told him his great grandfathers nickname so he could not have fabricated that
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Gnomefro No its not wishfull thinking or lies lots of people have near death experiences some dont even people who dont believe in god have them so it has nothing to do with religion. And i said my stepson was not told about his grandfather but yet when he was shown a picture from a family photo album he said mommy thats the guy that talks to me his name is t bone which was his nick name now how can a three year old at the time fabricate something like that
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Do you know how to use the reply system? They aren't necessarily getting your responses if you don't hit the reply button, and I am getting them. It's annoying for me, and unfair to them.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
spoken of sorry
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And he was never spoking of to him
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And if there is no god or afterlife how do you explain near death experiences. Even children who have no understanding of god or death but they still see the other side. Just like my stepson who seen his dead grandfather and described him to a t with out even knowing of him he would say to my fiance i saw a guy then one day my fiance was looking through pictures and he was in them and my stepson said mommy thats the guy i see his name is t bone and that was the nick name of him explain that
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 "And if there is no god or afterlife how do you explain near death experiences."
A combination of biological processes, lies to get attention, and wishful thinking - both on part of the person claiming to have had the NDE and the people interpreting what he's saying.
To take your stepson, you for some reason think it more likely that magic is real than that your stepson actually knew the guy on the picture without your knowledge.
Gnomefro 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Anyway, it's also quite telling that people who have NDEs always seem to have experiences validating the cultural superstitions of the area where they live.
With regards to children it's also important to realize how easy it is to produce answers by leading questions. The pitfalls here are profound and well documented in the psychological literature.
Gnomefro 1 month ago
Just like when you refine oil to gas you get brine water which is not gas or oil its a conversion of the two just like when the energy combines with the electrons and neutrons and so forth to make light the bi product of the two mixtures
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Like light being energy when its not you can create light and destroy it so there for it can not be energy because energy cant be created or destroyed only converted and light is a conversion of energy not energy itself energy is the cause of the lights existence other wise light would always be with out a source if light was energy it would not be able to be created or destroyed which it can
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
it seems like im the only one talking all you come up with is ideas that can easily be destroyed. I give explanations and evidence as to why somethings dont happen the way you want them too
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And i am discussing and yes i am capable of undestanding seems your not or you wouldnt give up your just not liking what im saying and its not going in your favor thats why and now your out of ideas and so forth. If you cant hang with the big dogs stay on the porch in other words shut your mouth if you dont want people to talk about this shit im debating thats what this is intended for
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Whats wrong cant you take the truth because all the shit your saying i can easily disproove. And now all you can say is stop spaming my channel ya thats the evolutionists way of getting out of things when he is stumped and cant come up with any explanation to contradict what i just said so be a man and stop saying i dont understand when i do. I mean after all you put it out there to debate didnt you but now your shut down and cant think of any other bullshit to put out there
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
caused it. We dont say because of evolution we discovered medicine we say because of technology we discovered medicine and how the body works so this has nothing to do with evolution. Thats just evolutionists way to further spread their fairy tale by saying everything all of a sudden has to do with evolution and it dont its the discovery of medicine and how the body works and what is not suppose to be there
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And no evolution is not why we discovered medicine its called technology and understanding if the field of medicine was not around we would not have these new medicines so there for it would not be evolution that caused it tecnology is responsible some diseases were around just like everything else that dont mean it evolved its just that we started observing the body and how it works and what aint suppose to be there with out exrays and microscopes we would not know that its not evolution that
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 It's not how we discovered medicine, but it is how we currently develop new anti-biotics.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
Ya they didnt evolve because evolution did not happen thats why elephants didnt evolve for 44 million years
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Could you stop spamming my channel please? It's clear you aren't interested in discussion, and even if you were, are rather incapable of understanding the concepts you're speaking of.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
and the science channel
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
the name is science magazine
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And science magazine is a named magazine shows how much you know
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
rocks that fall between bigger ones and get buried so what you trying to proove
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Well of course you can find heavier rocks on top of small rocks that prooves nothing. Its all how the rocks landed or if they eroded or broke from the heavier rocks mostly when your digging you get small rocks on top then when you get deeper the rocks get bigger but this prooves nothing that does not diproove a flood at all because smaller rocks can be burried by water faster than a bigger rock it takes more force to burry a bigger rock than it does a smaller one so there for you get smaller
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Have you thought about making a few videos about the things you're speaking of here?
I'm sure people would be very interested in hearing what you have to say.
Skindoggiedog 1 month ago
In the last statement i meant something from nothing not nothing from nothing
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
The only reason light can not be energy is because light can be created and destroyed energy can not so light is a bi product of energy kind of like when you refine oil into gas you get a brine water a bi product of the refinig
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
With out coal you can not create a diamond
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And how could that atom that exploded be there when there was no stars around to create it the explosion of stars is what makes all the elements necessary for all to exist the stars are what made all the elements needed for life and made the atoms so with out stars there could not have been atoms
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Honestdiscussor you have no idea what im talking about i said nothing about what you are talking about i did not say anything about nothing from nothing
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Thats a couple of the discussions i read and seen on tv
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Its a law of physics if an object is turning clockwise and if thrown off an object will remain turning clockwise. Just like the tire of a car if the vehicle is moving forward and the tire comes off it will keep moving forward and not go backward
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And besides the big bang is a theory not fact just like evolution if the big bang exploded clock wise and theres planets spinning counter clockwise how is that possible when all the other planets spin clockwise
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
So ya we can live with out some organs but it reduces your life and most people have problems when they have some of these organs removed
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Our liver cleans the blood and aids in digestion and our immune system
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And as far as the organs go we need them to to take toxins out of food and to battle against infections and diseases when you remove any of these organs you become more prone to getting theses diseases and toxins our appendix helps take the poisons out of greens that we eat and our kidneys take the bad toxins and bacteria out of our urine so it does not get in our blood and aids in digestion and cleaning of the blood
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Wher oxygen can be obsorbed in your blood through your nose faster than through your lungs
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Its like they say we dont need our noses but we do with out your nose you would not be able taste or smell and most of all you would not be able to breath while you are eating or drinking because your only air passage would be obstructed and you would choke and when you fell asleep you would suffocate because most people sleep with their mouths closed and also oxygen gets to the brain faster through your nose then your lungs because it has to go through a chemical change to get in your blood
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
So the whole tail thing is debunked its not a trait of evolution at all
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Because as a sperm we need that tail to swim to the egg and in all animals that tail becomes the spine of that animal you can clearly see that through ultra sounds all the things that humans and animals have are there for a reason not because of evolution
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And as far as the whole tail thing is concerned the only reason we have tail bones is because as a sperm we had a tail why do you think all animals have them some keep growing because those animals need them ours stopped because we dont need them but sometimes the dna that shuts that off backfires and dont shut off called a slight variation or mutation not evolution all animals have tails because of the sperm cell not because of an ancestor
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And if the dirt itself built up like that by itself there would be no mountains but we know thats impossible because of wind and rain erosion so there had to be a major flood in order to make that kind of geological formation
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And dust and wind could not have burried all that stuff by itself its impossible thats just like taking a big glass of water and dump dirt in it and watch how the different types of sediment settle just like the geological sediment
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Because water itself pushes things up from underneath the ground over time because the water pressure gets so great
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Well how else would you explain trees growing through rocks it does not happen and how else would all those things get buried like that including ones that were eating or giving birth and how else would the bones get down that far with out being barried by a flood and wood would not be burried that way because wood decays very fast it would take millions of years for things to get buried like that on its own if its even possible giving rain and wind erosion
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
No remember the universe was created its not eternal now thats saying the big bang theory would be incorrect now your condradicting yourself
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 You have no idea what you're talking about. The Big Bang doesn't talk about "something from nothing", it references the expansion of an already existing singularity.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner also according to great pschysist nothing may not exist in psychics,( quantum flcuktualtion)- Steven krauss- a universe from nothing. you should read it. he explains that the term nothing doesn't exist because quantum fluctulation doesn't allow it to. all you need is absolute nothing for quantum flcutuation to take place. he explains it well and it fits together nicely also he is a professional on this stuff.
Tethloach1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Transatlantic No dna does not allow new species to come from other species the species all animals and humans produce are all the same species a human makes a human a dog makes a dog and so on a dog dont produce a cat its genetically impossible all species that bare young are all the same species of its kind not totally different a slight variation which dna allows but it does not allow a new species because it stops after so long
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Transatlantic No dna does not allow new species to come from other species the species all animals and humans produce are all the same species a human makes a human a dog makes a dog and so on a dog dont produce a cat its genetically impossible all species that bare young are all the same species of its kind not totally different a slight variation which dna allows but it does not allow a new species because it stops after so long
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Transatlantic No dna does not allow new species to come from other species the species all animals and humans produce are all the same species a human makes a human a dog makes a dog and so on a dog dont produce a cat its genetically impossible all species that bare young are all the same species of its kind not totally different a slight variation which dna allows but it does not allow a new species because it stops after so long
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
scientist would tell you their far from any proof
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
No evolution is not from reproduction Dna only allows slight variation not a totaly different species if that was the case im sure some animal like a horse or something would have evolved by now but all animals are still the same species. Evolutionists like to say shit like that when their other original theory does not work or add up so then they say something else caused it thats typical of them there is no proof of evolution but every body keeps calling it fact when its not and any true
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Transatlantic. Why do you think everybody wants to save the bee population including the honey bees with out bees plants would not be able to pollenate therefore they would not bear seeds and wont grow there i said it again ITS NOT EVOLUTION
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And about the dogs yes all dogs came from the wolf but their all dogs and the only reason we have so many breeds is because humans made them not evolution their all the same species
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
transatlantic your stupid question about how do you explain plant speciation with out evolution your a moron seems you want to know the answer your self thats why you keep asking that same question if you dont know it when ive told you and im sure other people told you if you know then why ask just goes to show you dont know its called pollenation by bees not evolution with out bees no plants would grow duh
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
And its funny how god the creator needed a creator when energy its self did not need a creator according to science energy can not be created or destoyed only converted which is what i was mentioning about light being an after effect of energy light itself is not energy because energy cannot be created or destroyed only converted. And if energy dont need a creator neither does god because god him self could be that very same energy
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Sure, God could be eternal, but then so could the universe and then there's no need for God to create it.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
transatlantic no light caused from energy its an after effect of energy. Light can be created by electricity the source of that light is electrons thats the energy light its self is not energy. And i said most scientist not all agree that the big bang is impossible i seen that on the science channel and in science magazine
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Ehh . . no. The vast majority of scientists accept the big bang as the best explanation of the evidence. You're going to have to do better than "a unnamed science magazine" if you want to say you've backed up your statements with facts.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
brutusandyou. Why wouldnt that be evolution after all thats what evolution is a change from one species to another
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
sure theres evidence in the geological layers why do you think theres trees in it upside down and how else do you think these things got buried
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 You do realize a quick google search of "sideways trees" debunks the idea that a flood would be the only way it could happen, right?
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
And anyway transatlantic why dont you try to explain plant speciation through evolution I want to see what kind of dumbass you are
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
well plants speciate just like humans we speciate by mating with someone not related thats how you speciate and plants speciate through pollination not evolution a be takes pollen from another plant and takes it to other ones
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 I asked translantic how plants and trees evolved before the insects required for pollination existed. He said, "It's called CO-evolution" HAHA, yeah sure, cause scientists are constantly finding fossilized bees with unevolved wings, but they could still fly and take care of this pollination required for his Magical speciation of plants and trees to still happen. And he wont tell me why elephants haven't evolved into something other than a mammal in 44 million years!!
ironman197268 1 month ago
The dna shows its impossible and any good scientist would tell you that they really dont have evidence only speculation so with out evidence you cant have fact
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Evolution is not fact or it would be called fact of evolution not theory so stop the bullshit it is not fact and never will be because it never happened its impossible
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cjguitarist100 "Evolution is not fact or it would be called fact of evolution not theory"
Maybe it's possible that "theory" is technical jargon that means something different in another field, have you ever thought of that?
BrutusAndYou 1 month ago
Natural selection is all bullshit we aint going to change from one species to another because we want to if that was true boy i would be a different kind of human what a bunch of bull shit. All that is true is your born with what you have and like it. So if i want to naturally select living in a tree i guess i will grow a tail and walk on all fours again what crap
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
Okay what are these mechanism that dont need a creator give the evidence as to why it dont need a creator and tell me how it got there if it was not created
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 "Okay what are these mechanism that dont need a creator give the evidence as to why it dont need a creator and tell me how it got there if it was not created" are you claiming a creator needs a creator?
BrutusAndYou 1 month ago
The talk about parent to an offspring being evolution is stupid now your throwing shit out there thats just evolutionists way to get you to believe their fairy tale thats like saying taking a shit is evolution no having a baby is not evolution evolution is a change from one species to another because that newborn baby still has the human gnome. Now if that parent gave birth to a horse or something then i would believe in evolution. But untill then its bullshit and always will be
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 "Now if that parent gave birth to a horse or something then i would believe in evolution. "
Actually, if that happened, that wouldn't be evolution, that would be magic.
For starters, think of the Canis genus for example, wolves, domestic dogs, African wild dogs, jackals, coyotes. Domestic dogs came from wolves, but you won't expect a wolf to give birth to Jack Russell Terrier, but they're are distant relatives. Do you need to see a wolf give birth to a dingo?
BrutusAndYou 1 month ago
transatlantic. What the hell are you talking about plants are related to their own species and just like humans they have an ability to become immune to stuff thats not evolution
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
So there for there had to be a creator to give us this information.
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 actually there has to be a creator-creator to give that creator information, and there needs to be a creator-creator-creator to give that creator-creator information, etc
BrutusAndYou 1 month ago
Because if not how would we know how to talk and speak english spanish ex. We had to be taught what to eat and not eat we did not naturally select it life runs off of being taught learning not natural selection
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
transatlantic. What the hell are you talking about water coming up and watering the plants from underground thats just stupid now your implying that the earth has a mind and had to water its garden everynight no it didnt work that way. And besides that natural selection is bullshit too im gonna start naturally selecting a bigger head and see what happens i bet it will never happen as babies we have to be taught how to live not naturally select it there has to be a creator
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
How do you know that mass floods are impossible can you prove them to be impossible and its funny you should mention the ark because it was found right where the bible said it would be
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Mass floods are not impossible, its just that a world wide flood didn't happen. There's no record of such an event in the geological layers, despite claims to the contrary, and there's certainly no DNA evidence that all of the species on the earth were down to a few pairs. You can see when populations drop to low levels, like what happened to the Cheetah population, but that doesn't happen overall.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
And most mutations are not beneficial they are bad
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Most are neutral actually. Some are bad, of course, and when they are bad those organisms die out in favor of the ones without that bad mutation. However the ones with good mutations are more likely to pass their genes on, and this is how natural selection works.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
jargon
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
to junglejardon. how do you explain different species in the genome when our dna only shows same species and our dna allows for slight variation not new species its scientifically proven. And besides mutations are not evolution because its still the same species its either becase that part of the dna fired in a different order or it never shut off like it was suppose to which is called a slight variation which in a sense is a mutation either way its the same species not different
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Evolution happens over time, it's the accumulation of mutations. Did you even watch this video which is designed to dispel this very myth?
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
If the big bang is true there absolutely had to be light because light is an after effect of energy and energy always was. But i dont really believe in the big bang because of the atom the atom could not have been around before the big bang because the materials to make all we see now only came from stars exploding so there for with out stars it is impossible to have an atom
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Complex atoms are formed in stars, but not hydrogen, which is what stars are formed from, mainly. You didn't research this at all did you? At least not actual science research.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
Well ironman. The big bang theory itself is flawed because scientists themselves say it is unlikely that it happened because the heat generated would have killed anything that would have or been able to live and the force it created would have imploded everything in on its self crushing it to nothing
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 "The big bang theory itself is flawed because scientists themselves say it is unlikely that it happened because the heat generated would have killed anything that would have or been able to live and the force it created would have imploded everything in on its self crushing it to nothing"
This is just wildly inaccurate. The scientific community claims the Big Bang is as proven as anything can get in science. Life on earth didn't begin until billions of years after the big bang.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100
You reallly don't know anything about the big bang theory. Who are those "scientists themselves"? name them.
Light isn't an after effect of energy. Light IS energy. But you really don't know anything.
Ofc our DNA allows new species. We observe that all the time.
how do you explain Plant speciation w/Out using evolution theory?
denial isn't a very good argument from your side... I can prove very easily speciation.
transtlantic 1 month ago
If we did evolve then we would be all imbreds because we would all be related
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Inbred only applies when your DNA is too similar. You can have 1st cousins even (not always) that are genetically dissimilar enough to have children without a high likelihood of genetic complications.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
Because we only gain dna we dont lose it.Our dna only shows our species not fish mammal lizard and so on
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Really? Then how come we still have the DNA for tails? The DNA is deactivated, so it doesn't show up, although in rare cases it get switched back on and people grow short tail stubs, but this sorta shows you need to do a bit more research.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
How are we proof of evolution there is no evidence at all that we evolved. Evolution is nothing but a speculative fairy tale which has no proof. And besides all that it was scientifically proven that dna can not allow a species to change entirely different. And also dna is the blue print of life if we did evolve it would be recorded in our dna from when the first thing evolved which would be the single celled organism thats how far back our dna would go but it dont
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 Is this really what you did on your New Years Eve? Very well.
What do you mean there's not evidence we evolved. Evangelical Christian and geneticist Francis Collins claims that the DNA evidence ALONE is enough to show we evolved, without any fossils. Truth is though, there's a plethora of fossil evidence which shows a clear transition between traditional apes and mankind.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
When the big bang started expanding, and at the time it was the size of a bowling ball, was there any light happening at the same time in this expansion?
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Not sure, but I do know it was very hot. Why don't you talk to someone who actually specializes in physics? After all, it seems you believe these questions are stumpers for even the most knowledgeable physicist. If they aren't, then they really aren't a problem for the big bang theory, so why not put it to the test, walk or drive over to the best university within distance of you, and schedule a meeting with the physics professor?
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner If you KNOW it was very hot, then how are you not sure of it containing light at the same time? And You are the one asking questions here, and I'm giving you answers. You should change the name of this video to...Questions for Physicists.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 If you are not asking a question, why did you end your inital post on this thread with a question mark? We know it was hot due to the fact it contained all of the energy in the universe, which is really hot. I won't rename my video "questions for physicists" because the video has nothing to do with the big bang. You brought that up that topic all on your own, possibly because you feel you have a stronger case with that. You do not.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@ironman197268
No, there was no light, as far as I know, since there was no nuclear reactions at the time.
Secondly, the size of a bowling ball? We can get much closer to the big bang than that (and therefore a much smaller point).
NBM397 1 month ago
Unfortunately you are dealing with a group of people who could care less about critical thinking or evidence....they rely on faith....
1n354a 1 month ago
@1n354a That's got to be the most Pathetic excuse, and Cop-out I've ever heard from someone who worships the Fairytale of Evilution!!
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 pathetic excuse? cop-out? what exactly are you blathering on about?
1n354a 1 month ago
Science is assuming that Andromeda is 2.5 million light years away, they have to be because they get this distance based off the assumption that the speed of light has been traveling 186,000 miles per second consistently. The speed of light has been observed to be slowing down (Astronomer Berry Setterfield) so it used to be going faster. That would mean the light got here a lot faster, if it even had to get here. The light has always been here, God stretched out the Heavens, Isaiah 45:12.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Setterfield used centuries old numbers that were procured through outdated methods, leaving out similarly outdated measurements which showed an increase in the speed of light, and then compared them to today. Measurements in the past 60 years or so show no decrease in the speed of light.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner If what you're saying is true then the Big Bang had to expand billions of times faster than the speed of light, and NO light existed in this Magical expansion. Then about 13.7 billion years ago this expansion, absent of light, traveling billions of times faster than the speed of light, slammed on the brakes and slowed down to about 200,000 miles per hour, and then turned on all the lights. cont...
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Why exactly would the big bang require the expansion to go billions of years faster than light? I don't think you really understand the theory.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner I understand it just fine. According to what you believe about the speed of light, my interpretation of the Big Bang is what you would have to believe in order for those galaxies to be as far away as you, and the scientific community claims. If not, when did the light start traveling?
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 I don't think you did your math correctly. Nothing is so far away from us right now that it could not have gotten as far as it did in 13.7 going only lightly less then twice the speed of light, relatively. Things can move away from other each other at faster than the speed of light, due to relativity. For example, if I run away from you at 5MPH, and you run away from me at 5MPH, our relative velocity is 10MPH.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner Well then show me were I did my Math incorrectly, if I even did any math at all. So if something out there is 14 billion light years away we should see it, even though its still billions of light years away according to Magical light speed and Earth age fiction.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Well we should be able to see it if the light is bright enough to reach us that far away, through a telescope in outer space. Our atmosphere blocks most of our vision of stars. The problem you're having is that it may be more than 20 billion light years away from us right now, but the light your seeing from it was emitted when it was far closer, as the light took a long time to travel to us. To my knowledge there's nothing we currently see that we shouldn't be able to see.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner And that light traveled through space for billions of years without being interrupted by other gravitational forces such as other stars and planets.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
Hmm, that doesn't wash.
youtube.com/user/cdk007#p/c/5975FF2FEECF90D3
NBM397 1 month ago
@NBM397 Your link is useless. All it did was take me to c"dumbass"k007's stupid channel. Please do NOT send me any meaningless Lies, Garbage, and useless, links, from that Lying, Godless youtube Loser!!
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
1) the link takes you to the playlist explaining why YE creationists must deny gravity.
2) It explains very well why the universe cannot be, say, 6000 year old, and,
3) It explaines very well why the speed of light haven't been changing (either slower or faster)
4) None of it is "Lies, Garbarge and useless, links".
5) Show us where he's lying. I dare you.
5) If you only want people who agree with your "god fearing" ignorant beliefs, go live in a theocracy.
NBM397 1 month ago
@NBM397 OK, I just looked at his Crappy channel and could not find any information about the lack of Helium in B type stars. If the BB is true then Why are those stars not dripping like a wet sponge with Helium?
I took you challenge and here's what I came up with...
watch?v=xbQpNYHTPVU&feature=plcp&context=C3b8f57fUDOEgsToPDskKJlDFYIksNqlGYsx3hXnDn
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
You took a very short look at a video channel, and because it doesn't address in text what you think it should, therefore the big bang didn't happen. Well done, you're a perfect example of a creatard.
In other words, why would Helium in B type stars be "dripping like a wet sponge"? Seriously, are you really that daft?
Oh, who am I kidding, of course you are serious: You believe the universe is less then ten thousand years old.
NBM397 1 month ago
@NBM397 Daft? What kind of Stupid word is that? Please keep on making assumptions about what I've done. I have viewed that channel Numerous times, and It just keeps on getting Stupider!! I'm sending you an article that destroys millions of years, and I would LOVE to hear you thoughts on it.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
Just because you're not familiar with a word doesn't mean it's stupid. Look up the word, if you're having trouble comprehending it.
Apparently you haven't watched it, but only taken note that he is "godless". I have seen the link I don't even know where to begin. It's so daft it's not even wrong.
For others, the link is:
icr.org/article/continents-should-have-eroded-long/
NBM397 1 month ago
@MrDaft Trust me, I've heard that word before and it's nothing but a bunch of wishful thinking when somebody applies it to what I'm saying.
You're in the biggest form of denial, or you didn't understand that article. And now you're going to force all of your followers to do the same thing if they choose to read it.
Did Mt. Everest Hit the Pause button for Erosion and Decay, when it started it's 50 million year long Uplift from a Seabed, and that's why marine life is found on its top today?
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
1) I don't have followers.
2) I don't believe in authority figures
3) No, Everest didn't hit the pause button.
4) Erosion happens at different speeds, depending on the place and the materials.
5) Mt. Everest has sea bottom on it, because the layers aren't pushed up while staying horisontal.
6) It seems you don't believe in tectonics either, and you wonder why I linked you to that playlist of why young earth creationist must also deny gravity.
NBM397 1 month ago
@ironman197268
Oh, I forgot: You obviously hadn't heard the word, or at least you didn't understand it, hence your need to point it is "stupid" and apparently awkward as well. You really are ignorant, and you're obviously proud of it.
NBM397 1 month ago
@NBM397 My comment on CDK007's channel: Think about it - That is a great video, thanks. And thanks to NBM397 for pointing it out. I was already subscribed to CDK007, but had not seen this earlier work. Sincerely.
csnowutube 1 month ago
@csnowutube
You're welcome.He has made some good stuff :-)
NBM397 1 month ago
@NBM397 Hey, what ever happened to cdk? Haven't heard from that guy a while.
HonestDiscussioner 1 month ago
@HonestDiscussioner
I don't know. I seem to recall him taking a time-off, but that could very well be someone else.
NBM397 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Did you mean: Astronomer Barry Setterfield? He was refuted years ago.
csnowutube 1 month ago
@csnowutube Was Charles Darwin refuted years ago? Why not? If the theory of evolution is true, then where are all the theme parks with the "Hominid Works" on display?
Please skip your Crap talk about how Rare fossilization is, I'm talking about Skeletons. And if dinosaur skeletons are found, then Hominid skeletons should be easier to find than dirt.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
Plenty of fossil human and pre-human skulls and skeletons in museums.
Your ignorance is appalling.
angelajaynemartin 1 month ago
@angelajaynemartin Yeah right!! please dream on if that makes you happy. Show me a video slide show of these "pre-human" skeletons in a museum. And don't go giving me your pathetic Crap talk excuses like, Oh museums don't allow cameras. If evolution was true there seriously would be Theme parks displaying the evidence, and there isn't, only excuses.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 there are plenty of homonid skeletons....ever been to a museum?
1n354a 1 month ago
@1n354a Many times, and NEVER have I seen a hominid skeleton. Show me a video slide show of these Hominids in a museum please.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 google homonid skeleton/fossil and go to the image page. I'll save you from your first trip to a museum and myself wasting time since you won't look at what I do anyways.
1n354a 1 month ago
@1n354a I shouldn't have to google anything about the history of Hominid existence. If evolution is true they should be as obvious as monkeys. And I'm not saying humans evolved from monkeys so calm down!!
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
LOL, do you do math the same way? Oh, it should be be obvious what the hypotenuse is, if math is so correct. I wouldn't have to know how to calculate it or anything else. If it's true, then it wouldn't need any evidence.
What a retarded response, Ironman. I bet you're a "one-book man".
NBM397 1 month ago
@ironman197268 you shouldn't have to or you are afraid to? Evolution is pretty obvious....but you do have to pull your head outta your arse....
1n354a 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Was Darwin refuted? Not that I know about. His work has been added to and we know he was not exactly right about everything he said, but no one has come up with anything better yet. Evolution is true. The theory explains it.
Theme park? Darwin's theory does not predict those. A museum or archaeology site would be as exciting to anyone interested. There are many of those.
If a skeleton does not fossilize, it turns to small pieces and makes up part of the "dirt".
csnowutube 1 month ago
@csnowutube Hey Man, you can share your delusional thoughts with somebody who cares, cause I don't. Nothing you say makes a Lick of sense. You're trying to make up a calamity to confuse the people that are interested in believing, into NOT believing!! Where are the Hominid skeletons? Real ones?
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
Why can't you explain Plant speciation w/out using evolution theory?
oh right: because there is NO OTHER explanation for the phenomena where a species originates another species by means of random mutations and natural selection.
fuck off and go read the Dover trial notes, you ignorant fuck.
transtlantic 1 month ago
@transtlantic Are you So lazy, you can't hit two extra keys on the keyboard to spell out the word "without" or do you just do it to feed that little insecure famished attention monster that lives in the part of your brain that skips like a scratched record?
For the fourth time, A Plant is a Plant, speciation is NOT EVILution. Go create a plant from nothing and video tape it Evolving into new species and I'll give you question a little more consideration.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268
uhm....I notice you remain unable to explain Plant speciation w/out using evo theory.
A "plant" is not the name of any species. An elephant is a mammal, and it's kids remain mammals, yet they are not humans. Why? because individuals are classified according to taxonomic rules. Speciation IS evolution. TRY explain it WITHOUT using evolution. I dare you. you dumb shit.
PUBMED- Plant speciation, search bar: Over 100,000 peer reviewed papers on SPECIATION
now fuck off you imbecile
transtlantic 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@transtlantic "An elephant is a mammal, and it's kids remain mammals"
Really? Well they've been running around the Earth for 55 million years now, When is evolution going to turn them into something other than a mammal? It didn't have a problem turning a T Rex into a Swallow did it? Now explain reptilian scale to bird feather evilution w/out using Creation.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Where are the Hominid skeletons? Museums. You can see them online - google hominid skeletons.
1n354a 1 month ago
@ironman197268 Are you ok? I asked you one question about someone you mentioned and now you are going off on all these different tangents. I don't claim to be an expert in any of these subjects, just an interested reader. Did you , or did you not mean "Barry Satterfield?" thanks.
csnowutube 1 month ago
@ironman197268 "Believing?" I would rather know, or say "I don't know yet." Whichever is closer to the truth. What do you "believe?"
csnowutube 1 month ago
@csnowutube Dream on sucka!! Just like 80 million year old dinosaur bones didn't fossilize. Not only that, they didn't even make it to the point to where all the soft tissue inside them decayed.
ironman197268 1 month ago
@ironman197268 You may have my messages mixed up with some one else. Your comment does not relate to what we were "talking" about. peace.
csnowutube 1 month ago
@csnowutube I think you're right. I got Ambushed on this video, so I must of accidentally replied to you. My apologies.
ironman197268 1 month ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52 Why is it that you constantly copy and paste a load of fallacies on EVERY atheist video?
Niemtol2 2 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 2 months ago
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52 Creationist scientists are biased, I would strongly discourage using this site on any valid scientific matter for everyone. If you do not believe me go and check out how much scientific papers they churn out in peer reviewed magazines. I think they even created their own peer reviewed magazine just to extend their hoax. They don't do anything there except political lobbying.
CrashPilot4 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52 Correct there is no conscious selection by nature. Natural selection has no goal in mind other than that the best version is the most likely to spread his genetic material. Indeed evolution by natural selection is indeed valid to explain the diversity of life not the origin of it. What exactly are you trying to infer with this spam?
CrashPilot4 2 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52 A slight change is muscle location is normal. That is the reason why etheopians can run far better than the average European or American joe as their body structure is better suited for running. What the fuck are you spamming about?
CrashPilot4 2 months ago