And how do you identify such a thing? What is your metric for design?
Interestingly, the only evidence for design we've ever come across has been design by humans. Indeed, the only metric by which design has ever been demonstrated is provision of evidence of the existence of a designer. Got any of that for your silly cosmic voyeur?
Well, you would have to explain what you mean by 'random' here. The word is often misused. It doesn't mean, as some suggest, without reason or cause. In scientific circles, random means 'statistically independent', which is to say that any given outcome is as probable as any other.
In any event, I wouldn't suggest that the universe is random, but stochastic, and this view is supported by all science.
In that case, you are working from a flawed definition, as there is no good reason to suggest that there exists any such thing as an unnatural pattern.
Perhaps a look at the definition of 'stochastic' would serve you in reducing your ignorance.
3.Having a moon to slow the spin of the Earth,without this the earth would rotate much faster generating winds of of hundreds of miles per hour.That would be bad for Human life.
What is your point here? I can make disjointed comments as well. If you have a serious point to make, then make it, and we'll see where it gets you in your pathetic attempts to support your pet celestial peeping-tom.
A few examples of millions that if they had not occurred,for Human life to exist......
1.For starters without a molten rotating Iron core ,there would be no magnetic field .The solar wind would sterilize the planet,in less than a week.Wow. 2.Being located in the perfect location to have liquid water.
Well, since life arose under those conditions, it's hardly surprising that those are the conditions we find life arising under. This is anthropic reasoning at its worst.
to suggest that there exists any such thing as an unnatural pattern.
Reply.....Really....................Any thing that has an intelligence behind its design and construction ....
ClarksonsinUSA 7 months ago
@ClarksonsinUSA
And how do you identify such a thing? What is your metric for design?
Interestingly, the only evidence for design we've ever come across has been design by humans. Indeed, the only metric by which design has ever been demonstrated is provision of evidence of the existence of a designer. Got any of that for your silly cosmic voyeur?
hackenbollox 7 months ago
If the universe is random ,this does not look random....
ClarksonsinUSA 7 months ago
@ClarksonsinUSA
Well, you would have to explain what you mean by 'random' here. The word is often misused. It doesn't mean, as some suggest, without reason or cause. In scientific circles, random means 'statistically independent', which is to say that any given outcome is as probable as any other.
In any event, I wouldn't suggest that the universe is random, but stochastic, and this view is supported by all science.
hackenbollox 7 months ago
@hackenbollox
Random the lack of unnatural patterns....
ClarksonsinUSA 7 months ago
@ClarksonsinUSA
In that case, you are working from a flawed definition, as there is no good reason to suggest that there exists any such thing as an unnatural pattern.
Perhaps a look at the definition of 'stochastic' would serve you in reducing your ignorance.
hackenbollox 7 months ago
3.Having a moon to slow the spin of the Earth,without this the earth would rotate much faster generating winds of of hundreds of miles per hour.That would be bad for Human life.
ClarksonsinUSA 7 months ago
@ClarksonsinUSA
My mum's got a washing machine.
What is your point here? I can make disjointed comments as well. If you have a serious point to make, then make it, and we'll see where it gets you in your pathetic attempts to support your pet celestial peeping-tom.
hackenbollox 7 months ago
Can atheist spot a pattern?
A few examples of millions that if they had not occurred,for Human life to exist......
1.For starters without a molten rotating Iron core ,there would be no magnetic field .The solar wind would sterilize the planet,in less than a week.Wow. 2.Being located in the perfect location to have liquid water.
ClarksonsinUSA 7 months ago
@ClarksonsinUSA
Well, since life arose under those conditions, it's hardly surprising that those are the conditions we find life arising under. This is anthropic reasoning at its worst.
Watch and learn:
?v=tCKqj-2JXZg
hackenbollox 7 months ago
You have to add: Extra life in eternal luxury as bonus; Else TruthfulXian won't register the info in his brain :)
MisterDoctorE 1 year ago
Fail.
TruthfulChristian2 1 year ago
@TruthfulChristian2
Interesting that you should say that, given your abject ignorance of just about everything. Good work.
hackenbollox 1 year ago
@TruthfulChristian2 Yes, a very accurate description of your videos TC.
BathTubNZ 1 year ago
@TruthfulChristian2
So, still no actual response to any of the points raised, eh? What can we infer from that?
hackenbollox 1 year ago
Hey, fun to see that you went for this as well - though you might want to try smacking your lips less, it's really reminding me of the Joker. :D :D
I might try something like that as well. ^^
RDissonant 1 year ago
@RDissonant
I was sucking a cough sweet, because I have a chest infection.
hackenbollox 1 year ago
Well done video. Great points.
themsfightinwoids 1 year ago