seriously people, is not just the planes do you know how many people waste electricity by leaving their computers running even when they are not home, also things like leaving tv's and lights randomly on, and the best part is they dont really care, makes we wonder if they dont care, why should i.
(ps. though i still care, because all little shit adds up to a big shit and wea ll end up being coverd in it)
I say bring back the day of the dirigible. At least for domestic flights and quite possibly for trans atlantic after all the Hindenberg made it several times before it, umm, exploded. Modern airship technology is much safer and advanced. Helium losses through the envelope are minimal. The ship could fly on batteries which would benefit from a partial recharge during daylight hours.
Balloons are fine(sorry dirigables/airships), but we move on and i suppose when they become a realistic alternative we will use them. Until then mate i'm afraid it's bloody easy jet n' british airways
True enough for most trans atlantic, but a large ammount of mail and freight is still transported by sea, Airships have phenominal lifting power for very little cost and are faster than ships. I think they are a realistic alternative for many applications, just not everything, like you say I'd travel by jet if I was going on a week's holiday to the other side of the world. But I'd take the airship If I wanted to go 500 miles up country. Think of it as a bigger bus service.
What about the good old prop engine seaplanes? some of them could land on runways and water you could use them from Hub air ports to alsorts of places large or small,for instance if you were flying to the red sea from the south coast of England instead of the inflight meal (sometimes good but not always) the plaine could pull in in Nice for some "propper" grub, (Do you get it?)If an aircraft flys lower and slower will it have less of an impact on the environment? see Imperial Airliners.
我不知道這個視頻要表達什麽意思，只覺得有點搞笑，哈哈。what a funny video!
upgiving 3 years ago
Friends of the earth need to stop spending money on shit like this oh and fucking off
bengladston 3 years ago
why wasn't it a woman?
ghost8605 3 years ago
Why does YouTube promote crap like this?
paphos71 3 years ago
Planes? what about heavy industry? What about energy production? those emissions figures make plane emissions look like a fart in the wind!
playmorewithclaymore 3 years ago
seriously people, is not just the planes do you know how many people waste electricity by leaving their computers running even when they are not home, also things like leaving tv's and lights randomly on, and the best part is they dont really care, makes we wonder if they dont care, why should i.
(ps. though i still care, because all little shit adds up to a big shit and wea ll end up being coverd in it)
TheImpersinators 3 years ago
yeah. my pc rarely goes off... maybe a restart a week.
then again... anyone know how much energy is wasted thru the copper wires were still using?
MadBadger 3 years ago
stripperplane is cool!
awarrior76 3 years ago
cool
lilo3116 3 years ago
Don't get why everyones being so bloody negative. Really gets on my nerves when useless people post useless comments.
Bettythebuilder 3 years ago
Fucking shit, who was the freaking fag that made this goddamn crap.
The only people who would enjoy this a flaming faggot. I don't even get what the advertisment was about.
SebastianThorson 3 years ago
What a waste of electricity used to put that together. If you want people to listen, how about making decent adverts?
DigitalDiabloUK 3 years ago
Moan moan moan.... you can do better? Do it.
No can't be arsed & beside I want to fly cheap to some pointless destination to moan at people overseas ;-)
Farweasel 3 years ago
I say bring back the day of the dirigible. At least for domestic flights and quite possibly for trans atlantic after all the Hindenberg made it several times before it, umm, exploded. Modern airship technology is much safer and advanced. Helium losses through the envelope are minimal. The ship could fly on batteries which would benefit from a partial recharge during daylight hours.
LukeSkyscraper 3 years ago
Yeah sure n' by the time ya get to ya holiday destination ya should have been back at work 3 fuckin' days..fly by superbus n' get there today!
majorsnag 3 years ago
You're a very angry person :P
I didn't say bin Airbus and travel by blimp. I just said use blimps again where appropriate.
LukeSkyscraper 3 years ago
Balloons are fine(sorry dirigables/airships), but we move on and i suppose when they become a realistic alternative we will use them. Until then mate i'm afraid it's bloody easy jet n' british airways
majorsnag 3 years ago
True enough for most trans atlantic, but a large ammount of mail and freight is still transported by sea, Airships have phenominal lifting power for very little cost and are faster than ships. I think they are a realistic alternative for many applications, just not everything, like you say I'd travel by jet if I was going on a week's holiday to the other side of the world. But I'd take the airship If I wanted to go 500 miles up country. Think of it as a bigger bus service.
LukeSkyscraper 3 years ago
What about the good old prop engine seaplanes? some of them could land on runways and water you could use them from Hub air ports to alsorts of places large or small,for instance if you were flying to the red sea from the south coast of England instead of the inflight meal (sometimes good but not always) the plaine could pull in in Nice for some "propper" grub, (Do you get it?)If an aircraft flys lower and slower will it have less of an impact on the environment? see Imperial Airliners.
antonynothard 3 years ago
And the smokers will lose out on this?
Glitchblitz 3 years ago
Rubbish!
teddyteeth 3 years ago
not for me its pants.....
bump1dog 3 years ago
sorry that sucks
youbeenframedpenrice 3 years ago
not sorry just sucks
ty2dahouse 3 years ago
lol
gulwant 3 years ago