This will step on alot of peoples toes, and they will argue with you, and try to challenge you, on this subject. to my flesh it was not hard to understand....
Thank you, what an eye opening to the truth....now I understand why the church is so corrupt. all this is satan evil dismise, the Bible depicted him as the prince of the air..so many people billions will be lost into hell!!! prince of the power of the air 2 corinthians 4:4. Heaven is not easy to enter as one may think....JESUS paid the ultimate price, but you still have to live according to his word (LAWS for the saints).. protect your salvation. diplomatic immunity to sin is wrong.
@IDH77so what then shall we continue in SIN that grace may abound,God FORBID!!!...god only delt with israel when you go back and read and understand the protocol of divine understanding, given by the father then to christ then to Gaberiel(the holy spirit aka the comforter" then Gaberiel gives it to israel and israel to whom will listen,for instance acts 10 cornelius was seeking god; he sent gaberiel in a vision "to tell him to seek further understanding from Peter" who was an israelite
@IDH77....so do you believe god is a vain god.....if god set something up it must come to past, the old testament is the blue print for what to come their are countless thing that have yet to be fulfilled,simply put christian is a nickname give to the disciples of christ because they followed him when he was in the flesh,Acts 7:37-38 tells you the church started in the wilderness with moses,the only law the was ever done away with was the sacrificial law because christ is the ultimate sacrifice
Sorry but you got your history wrong about Sunday worship.
The First Apology of Justin
“And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits”
@IDH77 On the contrary I can show you placesin Acts where people still met to hear the Word onthe seventh day sabbath. The sabbath was never replaced by Sunday. Nothing wrong with having a meeting on Sunday, but you cannot read in the Bible where Sunday was a replacement for the seventh day Sabbath.
@IDH77 Ok your statement was that the sabbath law was just for jews. Thats false, the ten commandments were never ONLY for jews. As far as the new covenant. that is not even in force yet! read hebrews 8:10-11, it tells you at what time this new covenant will actually be made. When ALL mankind knows The Lord. You have been lied to. And you still have not shown where the Sabbath has changed in any way.
@joelisraelatyahoo If the New Covenant is not in force yet then that means that Christianity doesn’t yet exist!
That’s what Christianity is, the New Covenant! A Covenant is CUT with blood in this case with the blood of Christ. If there is no New Covenant then there is no forgiveness of sins either.
Gentiles are grafted into the New Covenant by faith. Rom 11.
I'm sorry but what you're saying is not good exegesis never mind good theology.
@joelisraelatyahoo Yes it is in the Bible! Just because you don’t understand what the Bible actually says is not my fault!
A covenant is not cut and then put into practice 1000’s of years later its active from when it is cut. See Gen 15, the word ‘made’ is actually ‘cut’ in Hebrew.
When Jesus died he put the New Covenant into effect there and then. Heb 8:6 says that Jesus is the mediator NOW!
@IDH77 Yes I can see how that might be confusing. Another example is Romans 8:3, God sent His Son in the likeness of SINFUL FLESH (breaking the law). I doesnt mean He sinned.
@joelisraelatyahoo It became very obvious in the first few minutes that you are floundering around by yourself and getting confused with some very basic concepts while at the same time deceiving yourself by thinking you're somehow getting superior knowledge to ‘traditional Christianity’.
Do yourself a BIG favour and buy a Scofield Study Bible!
@IDH77 What do you know about Cyrus Scofield? I suggest you do some research on the man and those "who" financed him...It is called "Scofields Bible" because it has nothing to do with Gods word!
@mikesglider I've done plenty of research on Scofield and he and other Dispensationalists are/were men of God who don’t hold to the false doctrines of Judaising.
Scofield was a Born Again man who was saved out of a lot of sin.
@IDH77 I'm not going to waste time on all the details documenting Scofields criminal and personal life..they are well documented for any honest seeker. His greatest crime was his Judaising of the scriptures which is treason to the truth..and America. Financed and promoted by New York Talmudists...there's nothing left to say-but, Jesus predicted a 1st Century return..The Apostles did as well. Either he came as promised at 70 AD or he was a false prophet? Jews reject Christian futurism...
@IDH77 I do appreciate your giving me a choice...I was getting worried there! Lol! Often, I'm explaining the actual definition of words like "heretic" and "antisemitism" etc. Actually, I don't think I fit well into a box? (with a label..) I'd have to call myself "ex-futurist" as Christian futurism isn't working and goes against the clear words of scripture as well as documented history...writings of Josephus etc. What do you do with the honest textual arguments of "Jews For Judaism" etc?
@mikesglider Cont. The way I see it, we must choose. Jesus and his "Holy Apostles" were correct:They predicted a 1st Century return? Or, Christians like you and I, some 2,000 yrs. after the fact (who never witnessed anything close to "The Resurrection" and countless other "Miracles" in the physical presence and contact with Christ, and the Holy Spirit from Acts chapter 2) "somehow" know better than Jesus and his "Holy Apostles" (who were Holy Spirit inspired!) I can't do that leap..
@IDH77 Seriously? The whole point of Scofield and "his" Bible was to morph the text into "Judeo-Christianity",and Judeo-Christianity is not Christianity but is Judaism...which is Talmudism! (easy to prove/document) Example? Scofield in Matt.24:34 -"this (generation) shall not pass away..."correctly notes the greek word "Genea" but then gives the definition to the Greek word "genos" so that he can claim"the Jewish race/nation" was Jesus' intended meaning. This is terrible scholarship at best!
@mikesglider Continued... And deceit at worst! If one wishes to hold to a Dispensational-Futurist eschaetology that's one's right...but to maintain what we believe is a "false paradigm",one is forced to ignore or outright deny the plain,natural meaning of the text when it causes trouble to the paradigm. We think it is best to hold to the text and preserve the doctrine of "inspiration" rather than our "paradigm". To "rightly divide the word of truth" we must use proper interpretive techniques...
@mikesglider Continued... One such technique is taking the "explicit" (clear-obvious meaning) to interpret the "implicit" (less clear-more difficult) passages. For example; "Time" determines the "Nature" of a texts intended meaning..not the reverse! So, when looking at Matt.10:23 We can see that Jesus instructed his disciples to hurry because the time for preaching before his return was relatively short: "When they persecute you in one town, flee to the next, for truly, I say to you, you will"..
@mikesglider Continued.."not have gone through all the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes." This clear statement leaves no room for a huge delay. It certainly wouldn't have taken 2,000 yrs. to reach the towns of Isreal. Plus,most of those towns had been destroyed by 70AD. So, Christ's return must have happened by that time.Matt.16:28 Jesus said;"Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom". "Explicit"?
@mikesglider Continued... I can better explain my "paradigm shift" with the term "truthquest"? I'm in process ...and will gladly pass along info. that would better answer questions along the way to understanding ("why") a growing number are questioning the exegetical gymnastics required to cling to the futurist paradigm...God bless all who seek his kingdom and his rightousness!
@mikesglider Sorry but Judeo Christianity is true biblical Christianity! The historical definition of it is the belief that the entire Bible both Old and New Testaments are both the Word of God.
It has ZERO to do with the Talmud, which are the traditions of men mentioned in by the Lord Jesus Christ.
The teachings of Dispensationalism are also completely at odds with Rabbinical Judaism.
I don’t know where you're getting this stuff but it’s complete nonsense.
@IDH77 Of course it does...you don't understand what's at stake, which is the truth! First, you falsly judge another mans servant by malice or ignorance...both being bad (I am not antisemitic) Do you even know what "antisemitism" is? No, you don't! Anti= Against + Semitism= favoritism towards Semites(or Jews) So, logically it follows that "antisemitism"=not favoring Semites or Jews. So,"God is a Racist"? or "God is love"? "God is not a respecter of persons"! Salvation is for individuals!
@joelisraelatyahoo The Church of Jesus Christ is NOT Israel! Wherever Israel is mentioned it ALWAYS means the Jewish people.
The only exception is Gal 6:16 but even there it’s not referring to the whole of Israel but to Jewish believers as opposed to gentiles.
Paul clearly says we are not under Law but under grace, the Sabbath is part of the OT Law and believers are not bound by it. Rom 6:14. Also Col 2:13-17 clearly teaches that the old ordinances are done away with.
The blessed apostles…committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate…To him succeeded Anacletus; and after him, in the third place from the apostles, Clement was allotted the bishopric.
In other words Linus was the first Bishop of Rome NOT Peter and what's more he wasn’t called pope either and his only authority was in Rome not anywhere else.
the obelisks in egypt and the supposed "obelisks" elsewhere have no connection. The lincoln memorial is a memorial to lincoln. Not to some egyptian god/godess. And the other examples of modern obelisks have little or no connection to anything like egyptian obelisks. And the conclusion of this video is confusing. Am I supposed to stop going to church now? How is that a positive thing? Jesus made the first church (although it later became corrupt). Church is a good thing. I am finished.
@GeneralDomination Also not true....they are all related by Freemasonry....history disproves that statement. Instead of clinging to tradition, research these things. Even in the unrelated (and that is sarcasm) Washington Monument there are countless occult symbols. All of this ties back to Babylon, Jewish Mysticism...these symbols do not have different meanings to God...He hated them then, and though whitewashed today, He hates them now. Just bc man embraces it doesn't mean God does.
@LadyJStyles do you know what the word symbol means? It's something that means something else. The meaning of a symbol can change like the meaning of a word over a length of time. God didn't hate the symbol he hated what it stood for. If you used that symbol back then it was because you were using it for the occult. However when the monuments were built they had different meanings. Kinda like saying something is gay today means that it is homosexual but it used to mean happy.
@GeneralDomination Satan perverts words in his true nature. God expressly told Israel not to do what the Gentiles did, you telling me God changes over time? That's a lie. He is the same, we change. God holds us accountable for what we know. Example: Someone poops on a spoon, then cleans it & offers you breakfast on it. Do you want to eat it? That vile revolting poop is paganism & that spoon is the artifact of said practice. Why should God be offered poopy spoons if you wouldn't eat from it?
@GeneralDomination Oh, He should accept the grossness of pagan artifact because people don't use them that way anymore. It doesn't matter how much bleach you put on that poopy spoon, I will not eat from it. Even if symbols change their meaning, God hasn't changed. They were destroyed in the OT for a reason....if they were properly destroyed instead of absorbed & perverted, there would be no artifact or symbol to clean up...nothing to change meanings over time if people were obedient.
@LadyJStyles you seem to be incapable of grasping what I am saying. First of all you can't destroy a symbol completely unless God has a hand in it and I'd say if he wanted those symbols destroyed like you are saying then we wouldn't be having this discussion right now. You are completely ignoring the fact that words and symbols change meaning. Someone has tricked you into believing these symbols still have pagan meaning. They might. In the right context but that is not provided
The passover is a Jewish day to celebrate the passing over of the angel of death over the houses of the Israelites during the final plague in Egypt. It has no relevance to gentiles so unless you are Jewish there is no where in the Bible where gentiles are commanded in any way to celebrate the passover. It would be like attending a ww2 veteran's reunion even though during the war you didn't enlist in the army.
All these paintings being blended together and editted to show Jesus without a beard is reminding me of a silly movie called the Davinci Code. Any likeness to a woman that Jesus may possess could occure because A) you want it to so that you're theory makes sense B) the art at that time encouraged paintings in which men's faces and women's faces were very similar C) it could be an artistic device to show Jesus' beauty.
@GeneralDomination FYI..the real Jesus of the Bible is described as a "comely" unattractive looking black man not sum crossdressing handsum white dude
@thakozhani Who's arguing with that? An artist is allowed to make a picture unrealistic in order to make a symbol. For example, Jesus may have been unattractive but in order to symbolize his perfection they would make him appear attractive and although it may sound racist, back then white was attractive. If you take art and poetry literally then there are lots of things in the world that make no sense at all.
@GeneralDomination Ok..you obviously are reading from a revised version of the bible cause thats not how it was origanally translated in the kjv..with tht being said.. ..The Lord stated the we as man should not take away or add to His Word..I show my luv for Him as well by doing my best to keep His commandments as we as His followers are required to do..
@thakozhani You can't read the KJV and take it completely literally because it's a different language. English (like all languages) evolves over time. The old english of the KJV uses words that used to have one meaning that now have two meanings or a completely different meaning. Like the way the word gay has changed from meaning happy to meaning homosexual. And I cross-referenced the NIV that I took with several other revised versions and the KJV and it's consistent.
@thakozhani And who's taking away or adding to the Bible? I'm not taking away or adding anything. God has control of the bible's translation into different languages and into more modern languages. Do you really think He would keep the bible safe from ancient book burnings, library raids, and other mass-destructions of books just so that some modern scholars could fill it with lies? I don't think so. I think the Bible can be trusted with a little research and cross-referencing.
@GeneralDomination I agree with you partially here & that is this, God will get
His word to His ppl. I know for a fact that the NIV is NOT His word. Satan is a creature of habit..perversion. When he lied in the garden, he perverted God's word; when he tempted Jesus..same thing. So why not pervert a bible, God's written word? Example: Harper Collins has Zondervan books...they publish the Satanic bible...Harper Collins also publishes the NIV. Good & bad fruit from the same tree...Matt 7:16-20?
@LadyJStyles I don't just read the NIV I also cross reference it with the NLT, the ESV, ISV and also with the KJV although I don't get too specific with the KJV's wording I mostly look at what was the point they were trying to get across. Besides if good and bad fruit can't come from the same tree in the way that you seem to mean then every single person other than Jesus bears only bad fruit. I believe we all bear some bad fruit but ALL bad fruit? Come on.
@thakozhani And apart from Isaiah 53:2 "He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him." (which COULD be interpreted to be referring to the way he would be rejected by the Israelites.
And also Psalm 45:2- "ou are the most handsome of all. Gracious words stream from your lips. God himself has blessed you forever" Which contradicts Isaiah.
@thakozhani And I have looked and looked and have seen no part of the bible that refers to Jesus' skin colour. Do not be deceived by some false teachers with unstable doctrines. There are things about Jesus that we simply do not know. And these things do not matter. I don't care if he's white, black, orange, or bright green. He is still my saviour and I love him. At the end of the day that's all that matters.
@GeneralDomination I believe the closest reference to how He looked is Revelation 1:14-18. In order to truly love Him you must know Him....not know of Him.......
@LadyJStyles That is how he looked after he ascended to heaven. That's how he looked in John's vision. That is not how he looked when he walked the earth with his disciples. He did not have bronze feet and a sword coming out of his mouth. I know Him. I've known Him nearly my entire life and I've never stopped learning about Him. Besides, according the descriptions given he could have been a fat or skinny man, a tall or short man, and a young or old looking man. It is not said.
You seem to think that the Catholic church is the ONLY church. Almost all of the things that actually make sense in this video are nearly exclusive to the Catholic branch of christianity. No doubt the catholic church has seen more than it's share of corruption and now it's pretty out of control. You also seem to not grasp that symbols can have double meanings even though you mention that one symbol means both the babylonian fish god and a woman's genitalia. So why can't it also mean Jesus?
@GeneralDomination When have you ever known God and His people to embrace paganism? In every instance when they had conquered others, they were told to destroy those things. With God there is not double meaning....He is clear...destroy it......Satan, however, is the author of confusion and can become an angel of light.......
@LadyJStyles How can there be no double meaning for God? That's like saying he is incapable of understanding human language. In the 90's would God consider it sin to be happy? NO. Would it be sin to be gay? That depends on the context and therefore the meaning of the word gay. It's a word with TWO meanings. If someone is gay that can mean happy or it can mean homosexual. One of these things is acceptable to God. Your argument makes no sense. I think you are confused.
@GeneralDomination God is the ultimate linguistic specialist which is why He put the truth in the world so we could remove the blinders & stop believing a lie based on Satan's manipulation of people & words. In order to grow, we cannot believe we know it all, & I do not, but I do know from my personal walk that God is not pleased with these things. I can't tell you what to believe but I can tell the truth & I have done that. I pray the Holy Spirit leads you in your walk as well. Take care.
@LadyJStyles Can you give me an example of an experience that showed that God was not pleased with the use of the cross as a symbol of Jesus' ultimate sacrifice? Or the use of the (once) pagan symbol of the fish god as a symbol of the fishers of men? I'm not saying by any means that these symbols are holy or are praise-worthy. However they are not evil. They are symbols, used to communicate an idea. They are not magic markings that summon evil spirits or bad luck or anything.
The comparison to a mother being killed with a crowbar is inaccurate. The fact that Christ died on a cross is not important. It's why he died that's important. Through his death the path to heaven was made available. We could be forgiven because of the cross. So the cross honors his sacrifice not his murder. He was not murdered. He could have at any time summoned a host of angels to defend him but He sacrificed himself for all humanity. To die for someone is the greatest sign of love.
Carrying His own cross, He went out to the place of the Skull Notice it doesn't say he was just "crucified" he was nailed to a cross. He carried a cross. It was a cross. A cross is defined as "a structure consisting essentially of an upright and a transverse piece, upon which persons were formerly put to death." So a t is likely.
doctrine that 'buying and selling anything on the sabbath is evil' is incorrect. The reason it was considered so wicked to buy and sell with Tyre on the sabbath is because they were commanded before to not have any treaties with the neighboring countries, It wasn't the buying on the sabbath it was the buying from evil people whom God wanted them to have nothing to do with. The fact that this happened on the sabbath meant that they had not kept it holy and therefore broke the commandment.
@parkerjwill whats speculative about it... it can all be researched and proven.... those lies in those churches are speculative and LIES... tradition will damn
Good video, ironic and sad though Paganism is exposed, the Pagan names and titles God, Lord Jesus are used instead of the Ancient Hebrew Names Yahuah and Yahusha Ha Mashyach.
Babylon is not Christ. Christians are often confused and do not follow Chirst's word but instead the Babylonian teachings. Be sure not to demonize Christ because of Christians. Read Matthew for yourself, it is full of love and hope.
Most churches ommit and do not teach the words of Christ.
You don't seem to realize how much of Israel or Hebrew culture is centered around what you call "pagan" worship. This is a very good video, but there is so much information that is not presented here. Jewish religion is not exempt from ANY of the atrocities mentioned here.
You have many truths in your video, but rat poison is 99.05% food and 0.05% of it is poison. This video is rat poison. Your not being 100% truthful with what the Bible says about the Sabbath. The Catholic church is the whore of Babylon and unfortunately a lot of protestant churches have been taken over by Jesuits and false pastors and prophets. But not all churches are in this class of evil. Ever research the worship of Saturn worship and which day its worship on, it my scare you.
@Donking595 I don't follow false prophets nor am I in any 7th day adventest church. Its in the Bible to rest and keep the Sabbath day Holy. That I do know. All these "chrisitan" sunday churches are all pagan and lies. Find me one sunday church that keeps the Commandments. You can't becuase they are all Lawless.
@Donking595 The exact opposite. It says Jesus DID NOT come to destroy the law. Then it goes on tosay those that don't keep and teach the commandments will not enter into the kingdom.
@joelisraelatyahoo It does not say that. Show me where it says those who teach will not enter in? You have to keep the Law to go in. Sin is transgression of the Law. Its says those who don't teach will be least in the Kingdom and that is the truth.
@joelisraelatyahoo Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
TILL ALL BE FULFILED! All was fulfiled! So where does it put the law! Try Pass away! Also right after he said that he gave laws in the other verses and change them from the old.
@Donking595 well all of the days of the weeks were named by the romans so any day we worship on will be considered worshiping another god. God said rest on the seventh day saturday actually is the seventh day we were taught to believe otherwise
@Donking595 well that is the point of this video to let you know that they have not that will mean not following any of the commandments but yet we know that killing and stealing is wrong so they are all wrong and against god either you praise the most high or not
@nonelikememe So your saying the bible wrong and your wright? Because the Bible says all was fulfilled.
Acts 13:29 And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, they took [him] down from the tree, and laid [him] in a sepulchre. Acts 13:33 God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.
@Donking595 with all do respect if you believe that is what the bible is saying then i guess we are not born in sin and everyone born after christ death is automatically saved and is going to heaven or we are born in sin and once we get saved we can kill steal commit adultery or put other gods before him that's why the church is lost today and many christians are being deceived so the bible is right. just read and pray about it im sure you wouldn't want your works to be in vain.
@nonelikememe Are your saying those things not me. I never said that you can go steal, adultery or put other gods before God. Jesus gave commandments and the New Testament speeks clairly as to what you can and can't do as a Christian. The New Testament tells you who will not inherit the kingdom of God no adulter, murder, drunked etc.. but it did not even hit any thing about Sabbath. Jesus him self broke the Sabbath because he was lord of it. Rest in the Lord!
@eightway1 No he did not sin but he broke the Sabbath day!
John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
@eightway1 Exodus 31:15 Six days may work be done; but in the seventh [is] the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth [any] work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.
Luke 6:1 And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing [them] in [their] hands.
It appears that they broke the Sabbath! What book are you reading.
@eightway1 John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
@eightway1 Colossians 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]:
Romans 14:6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth [it] unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard [it]. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.
@eightway1 Jeremiah 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jeremiah 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day [that] I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
@eightway1 Deuteronomy 5:1 And Moses called all Israel, and said unto them, Hear, O Israel, the statutes and judgments which I speak in your ears this day, that ye may learn them, and keep, and do them.
Deuteronomy 5:2 The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.
Deuteronomy 5:3 The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, [even] us, who [are] all of us here alive this day.
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Check out Israelite teaching. Now I now What Rev 18:4 means.
@eightway1 Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
Acts 26:28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
1 Peter 4:16 Yet if [any man suffer] as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.
@eightway1 The old Testament and old Covenanat are not the same. The old covenant was mention in the old testament. The new covenant was prophesid in the old testament. And the new covenant was brought in the new testament by Jesus Christ.
@Donking595 Christians is a derogatory word that they embraced. this was not and never was a "religion" . sorta like the word nigger has been embraced by our people as nigga
@Donking595 CHRISTIAN comes from Latin 'christanius' as does 'cretin', 'cretan' and 'cretian'. The term was a derogatory word. They were calling believers "idiot" and "liars" in essence. Paul says they are ALWAYS LIARS in Titus 1. He was refering to a erroneous group in Crete that claimed to be teaching the truth about Messiah. This area is where Catholicism and others picked up the world in a pretended positive conotation. The protestants have maintained the error.
@eightway1 Did not even watch it! John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He came down in the flesh and gave commandments and it was more then ten.
Shalom.. you did an excellent job on this video..some people will not get it, thats okay. Maybe its not for them...if people want to hold on to man made traditions and customs of devils...then HEY that's on them...You did ur part...
cont...mass, bowing down in prayer, worship, incense, candles, Christmas, Easter, All Hallows Eve, Sunday worship, New Testament, purgatory, holy ghost, a dying god, bodily resurrection, and infant baptism, just to name a few Babylonian religious myths incorporated into your religion. And your religion ignores everything Yahowah said was important: the terms and conditions of the Covenant, the seven Called-Out Assembly Meetings, the Towrah Teaching, and Yahowah's name, to mention a few.
All these are from Babylon. The following serve as examples: the use of Lord, Church, Christian, the cross and crucifix, halos, gospel, trinity, saints, pope, fathers, nuns, cardinals, a hierarchal order, queen of heaven, mother of god, the eucharist, turning wine into blood and drinking it, the round wafer, sunburst religious icons, ...cont.
Read, YadaYah(dot)com...it will help point you in the right direction. For a loving Creator to command you to love Him or be punished forever doesn't even make sense. Find out why it's a religious fabrication.
And take in the radio show linked there. On CST 10:00am Mon thru Fri. Best news out there!
I agree with all of this except Constantine changing the Christian Sabbath to Sunday. Constantine just changed the naming of the days of the week to pagan names.
There are two sabbaths (Matthew 28:1)
Before the Resurrection of Christ, the Sabbath began in the evening. After the Resurrection, the Sabbath began at sunrise or dawn!
The Sabbath was changed from the 7th to the 1st day of the Jewish week because of the Resurrection:
The new covenant Christian Sabbath is the Lord's Day, (Sunday).
@JaimesPhazon Matthew 28: 1 Does Not claim 2 Sabbaths (LOL)..You have been deceived, Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, p. 153. “The church after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath or seventh-day of the week to the first, made the third commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord’s day.”...."It was the Catholic church which made the law obliging us to keep Sunday holy. The Catholoc church abolished the Sabbath"..... Bishop T. Enright of St. Alphonsus Church 1905
@JaimesPhazon Where do you find evidence of two Shabbats in Matt 28? Genesis defined the Shabbat and I would say that when the Creator HIMSELF ordains something it pretty much STAYS ordained! Even if the catholics decided to no longer observe the Shabbat on the 7 day, it does NOT make the 1st day a Shabbat. MAN has created some false link between the Shabbat and the mere words "lord's day". They are NOT interchangeable. muslims=friday; catholics=sunday; Creator=Shabbat. I'm going with Creator.
@JaimesPhazon I would not waste two minutes with any site called martin luther a 'saint'. protestants are essentially catholic since they both do sunday, xmass and that day with the bunny, the name of which is simply too vile to even type.
Let people find G-d however they want, whatever method works for them. Let people be free and care more about ourselves and our own corrections, our own inner development. That is what will change this planet, responsibility toward ourselves.
@Raziyahu Can people be free to steal your car ? People caring about thenselves and their own "inner" development is precisely why the world is in the mess it is in. The Selfish nature of man is what causes Him to SIN/Transgress the Commandments of Almighty YAHUWAH.
@Manboss333 AND the way we part company with catholics is to honor the Shabbat observe the Feasts and use the Father and Son's ACTUAL names instead of titles.
The one known as Jesus was the Lute of Lovingkindness that was given as new revelation to King David. Paalm 92. You will find amazing figure was of him was found in the ancient are of Gandhara. Also scrolls from that era. Sons of God have always been represented by the sun, the sun is within you. As is the cosmos. Daughter ZION has the moon under her feet. Rev 12. ELI ZIYYON.
1. Moses didn't write the Torah. 2. Prophet Malachi told you that the sun of righteousness would come, the one that was promised to Moses. Micah and the other prophets tell you it is a woman. Confirmed again in Rev 12. 3. Sabbath is everyday for spiritual masters and the LORD God does not ask for worship, he asks people to rest and be in communion with him. REv 17 and Rev 18 is about the USA. Obama is Leopard in Rev 13. Fish is TAO.
"Man was not made for the Sabbath, but the Sabbath was made for man". God sees the heart, he does not judge as man does. The way people look to God is the way He will judge them. "You must be born again" Jesus said. Being Born Again means to be baptized with fire as well as with water, to receive the Holy Spirit within you. Not all people who say they are Christians (Christ like) are what they say.
@1Daphdong Act 17:11 shows Paul preaching to the Bereans. THEY then CONFIRMED what Paul said against the Tanakh. So anything Paul said HAS to be in the Tanakh or they could NOT have agreed. Scripture confirms Scripture. Conflicts must be held till clarified. So, where in the Tanakh did the Bereans find info about being born again? And what reason does the Tanakh give for needing it?
@elskid206 The Tanakh is beyond my learning. However, the need for being born again is obvious to me anyway. The Holy Spirit speaks to the spirit that we have within us. It is in this way that we hear from God and communicate with Him.
@1Daphdong Just so we are clear, the Tanakh is the so called "old testament". Frankly it is almost beyond all of us because the church had done a fabulous job of removing us from our history and our heritage. See, you are schooled in the "feeling" method taught by the church, 'hearing the Spirit", rather than using Scripture to confirm Scripture. You who else does "spirit to spirit", the new age movement: they call it channeling.
@elskid206 I need the Bible because it confirms things that I hear. I hate the New Age religion and any other that does not have Jesus Christ and Him crucified for our sins, who paid the price for our freedom. I have seen my Jesus. I know He will never leave me or forsake me. He told me this Himself, so I know I walk with Him and will be with Him in heaven one day.
This will step on alot of peoples toes, and they will argue with you, and try to challenge you, on this subject. to my flesh it was not hard to understand....
purple399 5 days ago
Thank you, what an eye opening to the truth....now I understand why the church is so corrupt. all this is satan evil dismise, the Bible depicted him as the prince of the air..so many people billions will be lost into hell!!! prince of the power of the air 2 corinthians 4:4. Heaven is not easy to enter as one may think....JESUS paid the ultimate price, but you still have to live according to his word (LAWS for the saints).. protect your salvation. diplomatic immunity to sin is wrong.
purple399 5 days ago
I believe Christ became my Sabbath, 24 hours a day,7 day's a week. Sunday laws mean nothing to me.
hawkinsd 1 week ago
@IDH77so what then shall we continue in SIN that grace may abound,God FORBID!!!...god only delt with israel when you go back and read and understand the protocol of divine understanding, given by the father then to christ then to Gaberiel(the holy spirit aka the comforter" then Gaberiel gives it to israel and israel to whom will listen,for instance acts 10 cornelius was seeking god; he sent gaberiel in a vision "to tell him to seek further understanding from Peter" who was an israelite
euqin 1 week ago
@IDH77....so do you believe god is a vain god.....if god set something up it must come to past, the old testament is the blue print for what to come their are countless thing that have yet to be fulfilled,simply put christian is a nickname give to the disciples of christ because they followed him when he was in the flesh,Acts 7:37-38 tells you the church started in the wilderness with moses,the only law the was ever done away with was the sacrificial law because christ is the ultimate sacrifice
euqin 1 week ago
Sorry but you got your history wrong about Sunday worship.
The First Apology of Justin
“And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits”
See Acts 20:7 & 1Cor 16:2
IDH77 2 weeks ago
@IDH77 On the contrary I can show you placesin Acts where people still met to hear the Word onthe seventh day sabbath. The sabbath was never replaced by Sunday. Nothing wrong with having a meeting on Sunday, but you cannot read in the Bible where Sunday was a replacement for the seventh day Sabbath.
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo Sorry but it’s the usual misunderstanding. Saturday is the Sabbath, those who call Sunday the Sabbath are in error.
Sunday however is the Lord’s Day the day on which the Lord was raised from the dead and on which historically the early GENTILE Church met.
Of course the apostles honoured the Sabbath as they were Jews but there is no commandment for gentile believers to bound to it.
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 Yes there is a commandment, you just didn't read it. Isaiah 56:6
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo Hello, that’s the OLD Covenant!
That’s referring to gentile converts to Judaism not the New Covenant, which is Christianity!
To convince me you'd have to find something in the New Testament.
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 Ok your statement was that the sabbath law was just for jews. Thats false, the ten commandments were never ONLY for jews. As far as the new covenant. that is not even in force yet! read hebrews 8:10-11, it tells you at what time this new covenant will actually be made. When ALL mankind knows The Lord. You have been lied to. And you still have not shown where the Sabbath has changed in any way.
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo If the New Covenant is not in force yet then that means that Christianity doesn’t yet exist!
That’s what Christianity is, the New Covenant! A Covenant is CUT with blood in this case with the blood of Christ. If there is no New Covenant then there is no forgiveness of sins either.
Gentiles are grafted into the New Covenant by faith. Rom 11.
I'm sorry but what you're saying is not good exegesis never mind good theology.
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 none of what your saying is in the Bible anywhere! and under the law means BREAKING the law, not keeping it. check your messeges.
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo Yes it is in the Bible! Just because you don’t understand what the Bible actually says is not my fault!
A covenant is not cut and then put into practice 1000’s of years later its active from when it is cut. See Gen 15, the word ‘made’ is actually ‘cut’ in Hebrew.
When Jesus died he put the New Covenant into effect there and then. Heb 8:6 says that Jesus is the mediator NOW!
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 do all men know the Lord right now, yes or no?
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo All genuine Christians do.
IDH77 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo Under the Law doesn’t mean breaking the law because that would make Jesus a sinner!
Galatians 4:4 But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, BORN UNDER THE LAW,
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 Yes I can see how that might be confusing. Another example is Romans 8:3, God sent His Son in the likeness of SINFUL FLESH (breaking the law). I doesnt mean He sinned.
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@IDH77 The woman Mary was sinful flesh, as all of us.
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@IDH77 did you watch the video?
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo It became very obvious in the first few minutes that you are floundering around by yourself and getting confused with some very basic concepts while at the same time deceiving yourself by thinking you're somehow getting superior knowledge to ‘traditional Christianity’.
Do yourself a BIG favour and buy a Scofield Study Bible!
So no I don’t have time to listen to confusion!
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 What do you know about Cyrus Scofield? I suggest you do some research on the man and those "who" financed him...It is called "Scofields Bible" because it has nothing to do with Gods word!
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider I've done plenty of research on Scofield and he and other Dispensationalists are/were men of God who don’t hold to the false doctrines of Judaising.
Scofield was a Born Again man who was saved out of a lot of sin.
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 I'm not going to waste time on all the details documenting Scofields criminal and personal life..they are well documented for any honest seeker. His greatest crime was his Judaising of the scriptures which is treason to the truth..and America. Financed and promoted by New York Talmudists...there's nothing left to say-but, Jesus predicted a 1st Century return..The Apostles did as well. Either he came as promised at 70 AD or he was a false prophet? Jews reject Christian futurism...
mikesglider 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mikesglider Judaising? You're obviously are talking from second or third hand sources!
I've got the Scofield Study Bible and there is definitely none there.
As for his sins that’s what he was SAVED OUT OF. It was part of his salvation testimony.
Are you one of those Pharisees who think Christians should be perfect with no sinful background?
IDH77 1 week ago
@mikesglider Either you're a preterist or non Christian? Which?
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 I do appreciate your giving me a choice...I was getting worried there! Lol! Often, I'm explaining the actual definition of words like "heretic" and "antisemitism" etc. Actually, I don't think I fit well into a box? (with a label..) I'd have to call myself "ex-futurist" as Christian futurism isn't working and goes against the clear words of scripture as well as documented history...writings of Josephus etc. What do you do with the honest textual arguments of "Jews For Judaism" etc?
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Cont. The way I see it, we must choose. Jesus and his "Holy Apostles" were correct:They predicted a 1st Century return? Or, Christians like you and I, some 2,000 yrs. after the fact (who never witnessed anything close to "The Resurrection" and countless other "Miracles" in the physical presence and contact with Christ, and the Holy Spirit from Acts chapter 2) "somehow" know better than Jesus and his "Holy Apostles" (who were Holy Spirit inspired!) I can't do that leap..
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider If you think futurism has failed then I'm afraid you never understood the teachings to begin with.
Jesus didn’t predict a 1st century return as you can see from the parables.
Luke 19:11-27 & 2Pet 3:3 clearly teach that the return of Christ would be in the far future.
In fact if you had kept up with present commentaries you would find that the Middle East is shaping up just as the Bible predicted.
IDH77 1 week ago
@mikesglider I'm curious you haven't given me any examples of how the Scofield Study Bible is guilty of Judaising.
So what are they?
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 Seriously? The whole point of Scofield and "his" Bible was to morph the text into "Judeo-Christianity",and Judeo-Christianity is not Christianity but is Judaism...which is Talmudism! (easy to prove/document) Example? Scofield in Matt.24:34 -"this (generation) shall not pass away..."correctly notes the greek word "Genea" but then gives the definition to the Greek word "genos" so that he can claim"the Jewish race/nation" was Jesus' intended meaning. This is terrible scholarship at best!
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Continued... And deceit at worst! If one wishes to hold to a Dispensational-Futurist eschaetology that's one's right...but to maintain what we believe is a "false paradigm",one is forced to ignore or outright deny the plain,natural meaning of the text when it causes trouble to the paradigm. We think it is best to hold to the text and preserve the doctrine of "inspiration" rather than our "paradigm". To "rightly divide the word of truth" we must use proper interpretive techniques...
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Continued... One such technique is taking the "explicit" (clear-obvious meaning) to interpret the "implicit" (less clear-more difficult) passages. For example; "Time" determines the "Nature" of a texts intended meaning..not the reverse! So, when looking at Matt.10:23 We can see that Jesus instructed his disciples to hurry because the time for preaching before his return was relatively short: "When they persecute you in one town, flee to the next, for truly, I say to you, you will"..
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Continued.."not have gone through all the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes." This clear statement leaves no room for a huge delay. It certainly wouldn't have taken 2,000 yrs. to reach the towns of Isreal. Plus,most of those towns had been destroyed by 70AD. So, Christ's return must have happened by that time.Matt.16:28 Jesus said;"Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom". "Explicit"?
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Continued... I can better explain my "paradigm shift" with the term "truthquest"? I'm in process ...and will gladly pass along info. that would better answer questions along the way to understanding ("why") a growing number are questioning the exegetical gymnastics required to cling to the futurist paradigm...God bless all who seek his kingdom and his rightousness!
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Sorry but Judeo Christianity is true biblical Christianity! The historical definition of it is the belief that the entire Bible both Old and New Testaments are both the Word of God.
It has ZERO to do with the Talmud, which are the traditions of men mentioned in by the Lord Jesus Christ.
The teachings of Dispensationalism are also completely at odds with Rabbinical Judaism.
I don’t know where you're getting this stuff but it’s complete nonsense.
IDH77 1 week ago
@mikesglider Sounds to me you’ve got a bit of anti-Semitism going on there!
Btw hating Jews is satanic not godly! They are still God’s chosen people and loved by Him! Scofield’s note on Matt 24:34 is correct.
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 Of course it does...you don't understand what's at stake, which is the truth! First, you falsly judge another mans servant by malice or ignorance...both being bad (I am not antisemitic) Do you even know what "antisemitism" is? No, you don't! Anti= Against + Semitism= favoritism towards Semites(or Jews) So, logically it follows that "antisemitism"=not favoring Semites or Jews. So,"God is a Racist"? or "God is love"? "God is not a respecter of persons"! Salvation is for individuals!
mikesglider 1 week ago
@mikesglider Semitism = favouritism! Well that’s a novel interpretation I've never heard of before! Complete nonsense though!
The fact is that God still loves the Jewish people and says so in Rom 11:1-2.
I'm not taking about salvation they're still under God’s condemnation for unbelief and you're right salvation is an individual matter.
The reason Israel is in the Land is because of God’s love for them. See Ezek 36 esp vv 20-23
IDH77 1 week ago
Comment removed
IDH77 1 week ago
@joelisraelatyahoo The Church of Jesus Christ is NOT Israel! Wherever Israel is mentioned it ALWAYS means the Jewish people.
The only exception is Gal 6:16 but even there it’s not referring to the whole of Israel but to Jewish believers as opposed to gentiles.
Paul clearly says we are not under Law but under grace, the Sabbath is part of the OT Law and believers are not bound by it. Rom 6:14. Also Col 2:13-17 clearly teaches that the old ordinances are done away with.
IDH77 1 week ago
@IDH77 your opinion, not scripture
joelisraelatyahoo 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Irenaeus Against Heresies.
The blessed apostles…committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate…To him succeeded Anacletus; and after him, in the third place from the apostles, Clement was allotted the bishopric.
In other words Linus was the first Bishop of Rome NOT Peter and what's more he wasn’t called pope either and his only authority was in Rome not anywhere else.
IDH77 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
IDH77 2 weeks ago
the obelisks in egypt and the supposed "obelisks" elsewhere have no connection. The lincoln memorial is a memorial to lincoln. Not to some egyptian god/godess. And the other examples of modern obelisks have little or no connection to anything like egyptian obelisks. And the conclusion of this video is confusing. Am I supposed to stop going to church now? How is that a positive thing? Jesus made the first church (although it later became corrupt). Church is a good thing. I am finished.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
@GeneralDomination Also not true....they are all related by Freemasonry....history disproves that statement. Instead of clinging to tradition, research these things. Even in the unrelated (and that is sarcasm) Washington Monument there are countless occult symbols. All of this ties back to Babylon, Jewish Mysticism...these symbols do not have different meanings to God...He hated them then, and though whitewashed today, He hates them now. Just bc man embraces it doesn't mean God does.
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@LadyJStyles do you know what the word symbol means? It's something that means something else. The meaning of a symbol can change like the meaning of a word over a length of time. God didn't hate the symbol he hated what it stood for. If you used that symbol back then it was because you were using it for the occult. However when the monuments were built they had different meanings. Kinda like saying something is gay today means that it is homosexual but it used to mean happy.
GeneralDomination 1 week ago
@GeneralDomination Satan perverts words in his true nature. God expressly told Israel not to do what the Gentiles did, you telling me God changes over time? That's a lie. He is the same, we change. God holds us accountable for what we know. Example: Someone poops on a spoon, then cleans it & offers you breakfast on it. Do you want to eat it? That vile revolting poop is paganism & that spoon is the artifact of said practice. Why should God be offered poopy spoons if you wouldn't eat from it?
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@GeneralDomination Oh, He should accept the grossness of pagan artifact because people don't use them that way anymore. It doesn't matter how much bleach you put on that poopy spoon, I will not eat from it. Even if symbols change their meaning, God hasn't changed. They were destroyed in the OT for a reason....if they were properly destroyed instead of absorbed & perverted, there would be no artifact or symbol to clean up...nothing to change meanings over time if people were obedient.
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@LadyJStyles you seem to be incapable of grasping what I am saying. First of all you can't destroy a symbol completely unless God has a hand in it and I'd say if he wanted those symbols destroyed like you are saying then we wouldn't be having this discussion right now. You are completely ignoring the fact that words and symbols change meaning. Someone has tricked you into believing these symbols still have pagan meaning. They might. In the right context but that is not provided
GeneralDomination 1 week ago
The passover is a Jewish day to celebrate the passing over of the angel of death over the houses of the Israelites during the final plague in Egypt. It has no relevance to gentiles so unless you are Jewish there is no where in the Bible where gentiles are commanded in any way to celebrate the passover. It would be like attending a ww2 veteran's reunion even though during the war you didn't enlist in the army.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
All these paintings being blended together and editted to show Jesus without a beard is reminding me of a silly movie called the Davinci Code. Any likeness to a woman that Jesus may possess could occure because A) you want it to so that you're theory makes sense B) the art at that time encouraged paintings in which men's faces and women's faces were very similar C) it could be an artistic device to show Jesus' beauty.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
@GeneralDomination FYI..the real Jesus of the Bible is described as a "comely" unattractive looking black man not sum crossdressing handsum white dude
thakozhani 3 weeks ago
@thakozhani Who's arguing with that? An artist is allowed to make a picture unrealistic in order to make a symbol. For example, Jesus may have been unattractive but in order to symbolize his perfection they would make him appear attractive and although it may sound racist, back then white was attractive. If you take art and poetry literally then there are lots of things in the world that make no sense at all.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
@GeneralDomination Ok..you obviously are reading from a revised version of the bible cause thats not how it was origanally translated in the kjv..with tht being said.. ..The Lord stated the we as man should not take away or add to His Word..I show my luv for Him as well by doing my best to keep His commandments as we as His followers are required to do..
thakozhani 3 weeks ago
@thakozhani You can't read the KJV and take it completely literally because it's a different language. English (like all languages) evolves over time. The old english of the KJV uses words that used to have one meaning that now have two meanings or a completely different meaning. Like the way the word gay has changed from meaning happy to meaning homosexual. And I cross-referenced the NIV that I took with several other revised versions and the KJV and it's consistent.
GeneralDomination 2 weeks ago
@thakozhani And who's taking away or adding to the Bible? I'm not taking away or adding anything. God has control of the bible's translation into different languages and into more modern languages. Do you really think He would keep the bible safe from ancient book burnings, library raids, and other mass-destructions of books just so that some modern scholars could fill it with lies? I don't think so. I think the Bible can be trusted with a little research and cross-referencing.
GeneralDomination 2 weeks ago
@GeneralDomination I agree with you partially here & that is this, God will get
His word to His ppl. I know for a fact that the NIV is NOT His word. Satan is a creature of habit..perversion. When he lied in the garden, he perverted God's word; when he tempted Jesus..same thing. So why not pervert a bible, God's written word? Example: Harper Collins has Zondervan books...they publish the Satanic bible...Harper Collins also publishes the NIV. Good & bad fruit from the same tree...Matt 7:16-20?
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@LadyJStyles I don't just read the NIV I also cross reference it with the NLT, the ESV, ISV and also with the KJV although I don't get too specific with the KJV's wording I mostly look at what was the point they were trying to get across. Besides if good and bad fruit can't come from the same tree in the way that you seem to mean then every single person other than Jesus bears only bad fruit. I believe we all bear some bad fruit but ALL bad fruit? Come on.
GeneralDomination 1 week ago
@thakozhani And apart from Isaiah 53:2 "He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him." (which COULD be interpreted to be referring to the way he would be rejected by the Israelites.
And also Psalm 45:2- "ou are the most handsome of all. Gracious words stream from your lips. God himself has blessed you forever" Which contradicts Isaiah.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
@thakozhani And I have looked and looked and have seen no part of the bible that refers to Jesus' skin colour. Do not be deceived by some false teachers with unstable doctrines. There are things about Jesus that we simply do not know. And these things do not matter. I don't care if he's white, black, orange, or bright green. He is still my saviour and I love him. At the end of the day that's all that matters.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
@GeneralDomination I believe the closest reference to how He looked is Revelation 1:14-18. In order to truly love Him you must know Him....not know of Him.......
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@LadyJStyles That is how he looked after he ascended to heaven. That's how he looked in John's vision. That is not how he looked when he walked the earth with his disciples. He did not have bronze feet and a sword coming out of his mouth. I know Him. I've known Him nearly my entire life and I've never stopped learning about Him. Besides, according the descriptions given he could have been a fat or skinny man, a tall or short man, and a young or old looking man. It is not said.
GeneralDomination 1 week ago
You seem to think that the Catholic church is the ONLY church. Almost all of the things that actually make sense in this video are nearly exclusive to the Catholic branch of christianity. No doubt the catholic church has seen more than it's share of corruption and now it's pretty out of control. You also seem to not grasp that symbols can have double meanings even though you mention that one symbol means both the babylonian fish god and a woman's genitalia. So why can't it also mean Jesus?
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
@GeneralDomination When have you ever known God and His people to embrace paganism? In every instance when they had conquered others, they were told to destroy those things. With God there is not double meaning....He is clear...destroy it......Satan, however, is the author of confusion and can become an angel of light.......
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@LadyJStyles How can there be no double meaning for God? That's like saying he is incapable of understanding human language. In the 90's would God consider it sin to be happy? NO. Would it be sin to be gay? That depends on the context and therefore the meaning of the word gay. It's a word with TWO meanings. If someone is gay that can mean happy or it can mean homosexual. One of these things is acceptable to God. Your argument makes no sense. I think you are confused.
GeneralDomination 1 week ago
@GeneralDomination God is the ultimate linguistic specialist which is why He put the truth in the world so we could remove the blinders & stop believing a lie based on Satan's manipulation of people & words. In order to grow, we cannot believe we know it all, & I do not, but I do know from my personal walk that God is not pleased with these things. I can't tell you what to believe but I can tell the truth & I have done that. I pray the Holy Spirit leads you in your walk as well. Take care.
LadyJStyles 1 week ago
@LadyJStyles Can you give me an example of an experience that showed that God was not pleased with the use of the cross as a symbol of Jesus' ultimate sacrifice? Or the use of the (once) pagan symbol of the fish god as a symbol of the fishers of men? I'm not saying by any means that these symbols are holy or are praise-worthy. However they are not evil. They are symbols, used to communicate an idea. They are not magic markings that summon evil spirits or bad luck or anything.
GeneralDomination 1 week ago
The comparison to a mother being killed with a crowbar is inaccurate. The fact that Christ died on a cross is not important. It's why he died that's important. Through his death the path to heaven was made available. We could be forgiven because of the cross. So the cross honors his sacrifice not his murder. He was not murdered. He could have at any time summoned a host of angels to defend him but He sacrificed himself for all humanity. To die for someone is the greatest sign of love.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
Mark 15:24
and He was nailed to a cross, and they made a division of His clothing among them, putting to decision of chance what everyone was to take.
John 19:17
Carrying His own cross, He went out to the place of the Skull Notice it doesn't say he was just "crucified" he was nailed to a cross. He carried a cross. It was a cross. A cross is defined as "a structure consisting essentially of an upright and a transverse piece, upon which persons were formerly put to death." So a t is likely.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
doctrine that 'buying and selling anything on the sabbath is evil' is incorrect. The reason it was considered so wicked to buy and sell with Tyre on the sabbath is because they were commanded before to not have any treaties with the neighboring countries, It wasn't the buying on the sabbath it was the buying from evil people whom God wanted them to have nothing to do with. The fact that this happened on the sabbath meant that they had not kept it holy and therefore broke the commandment.
GeneralDomination 3 weeks ago
Jaya Śivajī! This Documentary is VERY speculative.
parkerjwill 1 month ago
@parkerjwill whats speculative about it... it can all be researched and proven.... those lies in those churches are speculative and LIES... tradition will damn
solidkid4 1 month ago in playlist Truth
very good Word!
cheatjoc742 1 month ago
Please answer the Lunar solar calender for the TRUE Shabbat Worship. Do not use Pagen Calenders to find the True Holy worship Day.
cheatjoc742 1 month ago
Good video, ironic and sad though Paganism is exposed, the Pagan names and titles God, Lord Jesus are used instead of the Ancient Hebrew Names Yahuah and Yahusha Ha Mashyach.
AZPlayboy28 1 month ago
Great Expose'
please visit:
AVENUE OF LIGHT DOT COM
Avenueoflight7 1 month ago
Babylon is not Christ. Christians are often confused and do not follow Chirst's word but instead the Babylonian teachings. Be sure not to demonize Christ because of Christians. Read Matthew for yourself, it is full of love and hope.
Most churches ommit and do not teach the words of Christ.
Retloth 1 month ago
@Retloth Yes a lot of churches dont even mention Christ Jesus. They preach money money and more money. They are Jesuits for the most part.
Donking595 1 month ago
You don't seem to realize how much of Israel or Hebrew culture is centered around what you call "pagan" worship. This is a very good video, but there is so much information that is not presented here. Jewish religion is not exempt from ANY of the atrocities mentioned here.
firstladyshine 1 month ago
......
Mike7772009 2 months ago
as an atheist i find this video to be hysterical XD.
TheSpeedslayer 2 months ago
You have many truths in your video, but rat poison is 99.05% food and 0.05% of it is poison. This video is rat poison. Your not being 100% truthful with what the Bible says about the Sabbath. The Catholic church is the whore of Babylon and unfortunately a lot of protestant churches have been taken over by Jesuits and false pastors and prophets. But not all churches are in this class of evil. Ever research the worship of Saturn worship and which day its worship on, it my scare you.
Donking595 2 months ago 2
@Donking595 All SUNday churches are pagan and satanic idol sun god worship.
JasionJones 1 month ago in playlist the bible vs the christian church
@JasionJones Who told you that? Let me guess your pastor / Church / Ellen White. Because its not in the Bible.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595 I don't follow false prophets nor am I in any 7th day adventest church. Its in the Bible to rest and keep the Sabbath day Holy. That I do know. All these "chrisitan" sunday churches are all pagan and lies. Find me one sunday church that keeps the Commandments. You can't becuase they are all Lawless.
JasionJones 1 month ago
@JasionJones Did the laws pass away according to the bible?
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595 no
joelisraelatyahoo 1 month ago
@joelisraelatyahoo So what was Matthew Chap 5 ver 17 and 18 was talking about?
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595 The exact opposite. It says Jesus DID NOT come to destroy the law. Then it goes on tosay those that don't keep and teach the commandments will not enter into the kingdom.
joelisraelatyahoo 1 month ago
@joelisraelatyahoo It does not say that. Show me where it says those who teach will not enter in? You have to keep the Law to go in. Sin is transgression of the Law. Its says those who don't teach will be least in the Kingdom and that is the truth.
JasionJones 1 month ago
@joelisraelatyahoo Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
TILL ALL BE FULFILED! All was fulfiled! So where does it put the law! Try Pass away! Also right after he said that he gave laws in the other verses and change them from the old.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595 No.
JasionJones 1 month ago
@JasionJones So what did he do then?
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
Now go seek the TRUTH.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 I got the Bible and thats all the truth I need!
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
Mine too. So why are you a christian then? If you seek more of the TRUTH the bible IS NOT a christian book.
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595
Now go run away from that truth.
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595 well all of the days of the weeks were named by the romans so any day we worship on will be considered worshiping another god. God said rest on the seventh day saturday actually is the seventh day we were taught to believe otherwise
nonelikememe 1 month ago
@nonelikememe Did not the laws pass away!
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595 well that is the point of this video to let you know that they have not that will mean not following any of the commandments but yet we know that killing and stealing is wrong so they are all wrong and against god either you praise the most high or not
nonelikememe 1 month ago
@nonelikememe So your saying the bible wrong and your wright? Because the Bible says all was fulfilled.
Acts 13:29 And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, they took [him] down from the tree, and laid [him] in a sepulchre. Acts 13:33 God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595 with all do respect if you believe that is what the bible is saying then i guess we are not born in sin and everyone born after christ death is automatically saved and is going to heaven or we are born in sin and once we get saved we can kill steal commit adultery or put other gods before him that's why the church is lost today and many christians are being deceived so the bible is right. just read and pray about it im sure you wouldn't want your works to be in vain.
nonelikememe 1 month ago
@nonelikememe Are your saying those things not me. I never said that you can go steal, adultery or put other gods before God. Jesus gave commandments and the New Testament speeks clairly as to what you can and can't do as a Christian. The New Testament tells you who will not inherit the kingdom of God no adulter, murder, drunked etc.. but it did not even hit any thing about Sabbath. Jesus him self broke the Sabbath because he was lord of it. Rest in the Lord!
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
You are a liar. The Messiah DID NOT SIN.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 No he did not sin but he broke the Sabbath day!
John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
Isnt The Most High your Father?? The Messiah said its LAWFUL do good on the Sabbath. Doesnt sound like work to me.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 Exodus 31:15 Six days may work be done; but in the seventh [is] the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth [any] work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.
Luke 6:1 And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing [them] in [their] hands.
It appears that they broke the Sabbath! What book are you reading.
Donking595 1 month ago
@eightway1 John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
Donking595 1 month ago
@eightway1 Colossians 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]:
Romans 14:6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth [it] unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard [it]. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.
Explain this!
Donking595 1 month ago
@eightway1 Hebrews 8:7 For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Explain this!
Donking595 1 month ago
@eightway1 Jeremiah 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jeremiah 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day [that] I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Donking595 1 month ago
@eightway1 Deuteronomy 5:1 And Moses called all Israel, and said unto them, Hear, O Israel, the statutes and judgments which I speak in your ears this day, that ye may learn them, and keep, and do them.
Deuteronomy 5:2 The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.
Deuteronomy 5:3 The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, [even] us, who [are] all of us here alive this day.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
That doesnt mean to abolish the Sabbath.
Matthew 5:17 The Messiah said:
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Check out Israelite teaching. Now I now What Rev 18:4 means.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 You are running from the truth!
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
Get out that religion.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 What Religion? I am a Bible believing Christian. All my belief is base on the Bible only and no ideoligy of Religion.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
I dont see the word christian in the bible either. It was added in the 3rd century.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
Acts 26:28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
1 Peter 4:16 Yet if [any man suffer] as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
You people use epistles to fight against SCRIPTURE.
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595
The New Testament COMPLIMENTS the OLD!!! NOT ELIMINATE IT.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 The old Testament and old Covenanat are not the same. The old covenant was mention in the old testament. The new covenant was prophesid in the old testament. And the new covenant was brought in the new testament by Jesus Christ.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
Ok, so The Most High has no laws. You are a LIAR.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 I never said that you said that!
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
Well abide by His Divine law. Dont explain it away then.
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595 Christians is a derogatory word that they embraced. this was not and never was a "religion" . sorta like the word nigger has been embraced by our people as nigga
solidkid4 1 month ago
@Donking595 CHRISTIAN comes from Latin 'christanius' as does 'cretin', 'cretan' and 'cretian'. The term was a derogatory word. They were calling believers "idiot" and "liars" in essence. Paul says they are ALWAYS LIARS in Titus 1. He was refering to a erroneous group in Crete that claimed to be teaching the truth about Messiah. This area is where Catholicism and others picked up the world in a pretended positive conotation. The protestants have maintained the error.
solidkid4 1 month ago
@eightway1 What is the text Receptus. It is what the New testament was wriiten from and their are 5,700 plus manuscripts that disagree with you.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
The bible eats that text what you are trying to sa allup. Look at this video again. It hurts I know.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 Did not even watch it! John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He came down in the flesh and gave commandments and it was more then ten.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
AND?? What that has to do with ABOLISHING The Most Highs commandments? You christians grab at straws and NO TRUTH.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 O i see am waisting my time. I thought I was talking to some one with Jesus Christ in their life. My bad sorry.
Donking595 1 month ago
@Donking595
His name is not jesus anyway.
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595
You dont even know what the law is. UNBELIEVABLE.
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595
The ones who were sent to write these scripture of the bible were not CHRISTIANS. Now what are you?
eightway1 1 month ago
@Donking595
Pastor Dowell is a true pastor also.
eightway1 1 month ago
@eightway1 Who is talking about Pastor Dowell? How did he get in this?
Donking595 1 month ago
Shalom.. you did an excellent job on this video..some people will not get it, thats okay. Maybe its not for them...if people want to hold on to man made traditions and customs of devils...then HEY that's on them...You did ur part...
hebrewsRus 2 months ago
cont...mass, bowing down in prayer, worship, incense, candles, Christmas, Easter, All Hallows Eve, Sunday worship, New Testament, purgatory, holy ghost, a dying god, bodily resurrection, and infant baptism, just to name a few Babylonian religious myths incorporated into your religion. And your religion ignores everything Yahowah said was important: the terms and conditions of the Covenant, the seven Called-Out Assembly Meetings, the Towrah Teaching, and Yahowah's name, to mention a few.
materialclassified 3 months ago
All these are from Babylon. The following serve as examples: the use of Lord, Church, Christian, the cross and crucifix, halos, gospel, trinity, saints, pope, fathers, nuns, cardinals, a hierarchal order, queen of heaven, mother of god, the eucharist, turning wine into blood and drinking it, the round wafer, sunburst religious icons, ...cont.
materialclassified 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read, YadaYah(dot)com...it will help point you in the right direction. For a loving Creator to command you to love Him or be punished forever doesn't even make sense. Find out why it's a religious fabrication.
And take in the radio show linked there. On CST 10:00am Mon thru Fri. Best news out there!
materialclassified 3 months ago
Avenue Of Light dot com
Avenueoflight7 3 months ago
I agree with all of this except Constantine changing the Christian Sabbath to Sunday. Constantine just changed the naming of the days of the week to pagan names.
There are two sabbaths (Matthew 28:1)
Before the Resurrection of Christ, the Sabbath began in the evening. After the Resurrection, the Sabbath began at sunrise or dawn!
The Sabbath was changed from the 7th to the 1st day of the Jewish week because of the Resurrection:
The new covenant Christian Sabbath is the Lord's Day, (Sunday).
JaimesPhazon 3 months ago
@JaimesPhazon Seventh Day Adventism is a deceiving Satanic cult.
JaimesPhazon 3 months ago
@JaimesPhazon Matthew 28: 1 Does Not claim 2 Sabbaths (LOL)..You have been deceived, Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, p. 153. “The church after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath or seventh-day of the week to the first, made the third commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord’s day.”...."It was the Catholic church which made the law obliging us to keep Sunday holy. The Catholoc church abolished the Sabbath"..... Bishop T. Enright of St. Alphonsus Church 1905
paulpaid 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@paulpaid reformation[DOT]org/lords-day-sabbath[DOT]html
JaimesPhazon 2 months ago
@JaimesPhazon Where do you find evidence of two Shabbats in Matt 28? Genesis defined the Shabbat and I would say that when the Creator HIMSELF ordains something it pretty much STAYS ordained! Even if the catholics decided to no longer observe the Shabbat on the 7 day, it does NOT make the 1st day a Shabbat. MAN has created some false link between the Shabbat and the mere words "lord's day". They are NOT interchangeable. muslims=friday; catholics=sunday; Creator=Shabbat. I'm going with Creator.
elskid206 3 months ago
@elskid206 reformation[DOT]org/lords-day-sabbath[DOT]html
JaimesPhazon 2 months ago
@JaimesPhazon I would not waste two minutes with any site called martin luther a 'saint'. protestants are essentially catholic since they both do sunday, xmass and that day with the bunny, the name of which is simply too vile to even type.
elskid206 2 months ago
@JaimesPhazon Messiah rose again on the Sabbath Day. He was in the tomb 3 days and 3 nights (72 Hours) from Wednesday to Sabbath (Saturday)
YAHsaves777 2 months ago
Let people find G-d however they want, whatever method works for them. Let people be free and care more about ourselves and our own corrections, our own inner development. That is what will change this planet, responsibility toward ourselves.
Raziyahu 3 months ago
@Raziyahu Can people be free to steal your car ? People caring about thenselves and their own "inner" development is precisely why the world is in the mess it is in. The Selfish nature of man is what causes Him to SIN/Transgress the Commandments of Almighty YAHUWAH.
YAHsaves777 2 months ago
CHRISTIANITY IS NOT THE SAME AS ROMAN CATHOLICISM, WHICH IS EVIL.
JESUS CHRIST OR YESHUA HAMASHIACH IS THE NAME ABOVE ALL NAMES.
CHRISTIANS ARE THOSE WHO ARE "BORN AGAIN" AND FOLLOW CHRIST. THEY WERE PREVIOUSLY CALLED FOLLOWERS OF THE WAY (OF CHRIST).
Manboss333 3 months ago
@Manboss333 AND the way we part company with catholics is to honor the Shabbat observe the Feasts and use the Father and Son's ACTUAL names instead of titles.
elskid206 2 months ago
Don't forget that Barroso is up the backside of the KNIGHTS OF MALTA and the PALLAVICINI FAMILY of the Roman Empire.
anunnaki2006 3 months ago
The one known as Jesus was the Lute of Lovingkindness that was given as new revelation to King David. Paalm 92. You will find amazing figure was of him was found in the ancient are of Gandhara. Also scrolls from that era. Sons of God have always been represented by the sun, the sun is within you. As is the cosmos. Daughter ZION has the moon under her feet. Rev 12. ELI ZIYYON.
academysounds 3 months ago
1. Moses didn't write the Torah. 2. Prophet Malachi told you that the sun of righteousness would come, the one that was promised to Moses. Micah and the other prophets tell you it is a woman. Confirmed again in Rev 12. 3. Sabbath is everyday for spiritual masters and the LORD God does not ask for worship, he asks people to rest and be in communion with him. REv 17 and Rev 18 is about the USA. Obama is Leopard in Rev 13. Fish is TAO.
academysounds 3 months ago
"Man was not made for the Sabbath, but the Sabbath was made for man". God sees the heart, he does not judge as man does. The way people look to God is the way He will judge them. "You must be born again" Jesus said. Being Born Again means to be baptized with fire as well as with water, to receive the Holy Spirit within you. Not all people who say they are Christians (Christ like) are what they say.
1Daphdong 3 months ago
@1Daphdong Act 17:11 shows Paul preaching to the Bereans. THEY then CONFIRMED what Paul said against the Tanakh. So anything Paul said HAS to be in the Tanakh or they could NOT have agreed. Scripture confirms Scripture. Conflicts must be held till clarified. So, where in the Tanakh did the Bereans find info about being born again? And what reason does the Tanakh give for needing it?
elskid206 3 months ago
@elskid206 The Tanakh is beyond my learning. However, the need for being born again is obvious to me anyway. The Holy Spirit speaks to the spirit that we have within us. It is in this way that we hear from God and communicate with Him.
1Daphdong 3 months ago
@1Daphdong Just so we are clear, the Tanakh is the so called "old testament". Frankly it is almost beyond all of us because the church had done a fabulous job of removing us from our history and our heritage. See, you are schooled in the "feeling" method taught by the church, 'hearing the Spirit", rather than using Scripture to confirm Scripture. You who else does "spirit to spirit", the new age movement: they call it channeling.
elskid206 3 months ago
@elskid206 I need the Bible because it confirms things that I hear. I hate the New Age religion and any other that does not have Jesus Christ and Him crucified for our sins, who paid the price for our freedom. I have seen my Jesus. I know He will never leave me or forsake me. He told me this Himself, so I know I walk with Him and will be with Him in heaven one day.
1Daphdong 3 months ago