@ 49:40 snow tan by UBV ( the devolopement of clothing might very well of had play a part in skin pigmentation via as the UBV ray passed threw the clothing made from animal skin etc ) plus In the hot regions of the planet where they would of wore very little to no clothing.. body sweat beading up on the surface of the skin could of create a magnified lens effect as the sun ray entered into the deeper skin layors "Great video topic thanks"
i am shamed that human species divides it self based on how much melanolin is in their skin. what is it in us? are we that tribal in nature? why do we insist on favorin or discriminating based on skin? is it fear of being replaced?
@gethsoftware You need to look deeper and go back much, much further in our evolutionary past. Xenophobia is a built in defense mechanism, just like arachnophobia. And just like arachnophobia it can be overcome, but we need to accept that it is the default mechanism. We are all intolerant of certain groups be they religious,atheist, gay, breeders, socialist, libertarian, etc. I feel the best approach is to accept that fact and work from there and to work for a steady change from everyone.
Eugenics Movement is great, mechanisation of the mind. I'm not religious but religion is correct on the fact that we are not apes, these programs are being challenged everyday by people who are prepared to think outside the intellectual whorehouses that teach this robotic mind trance. It's an Ideology like religion, tools to divide and create control. Eugenics is massive today, check Bill Gates out.
why white people only white shin in Europe, and not in other parts of the world of the same latitude or higher? what about parts of Canada and Alaska that have been inhabbited for a long period of time? they are not white but of medium shin color?
@christinehowerton ok dont look it up, just believe me lol i just googled and saw tan skinned people, but i met a 100% athabascan in school and she was totally white. she retained some of the what i like to call tribal fatness(obesity)
skin cancer has a major effect, Africans who are born with the albinism mutation (common in Tanzania and Kenya) that causes them to have pink skin die young from skin cancer as the melanim that protects their skin cell from UV is lacking. Similarly, pale people survive better in Scandinavian countries, and dark people living in low light areas suffer from vitaminD defieiciency.
However, this population stuff however interesting tell us nothing about how melanin came into being.
@TheBlackOnWhiteCrime Stereotyping. I have known black people that look like had white features, chinese features..but they were black. If their skin was light they would just look asian or white. How can you not see this? Sure some black people look like the stereotype, but I went to an all black school once and I am white, they do not all look like the stereotype. Everyone has a different nose, skull, ears. IQ? Cultural practices contribute to intelligence. Not pigmentation level.
We were a white skinned animal that lost its fur and the skin darkened to compensate, we began walking upright, then our skin faded over the years, similar looking people in this time stuck together. Creating the many different styles of human features. If you believe anything other than that you are simply moronic. We still fight over our differences...
Imagine a red head in the African desert.. it would burn alive --- literally.. so blond people like me and red heads are best suited for climate like here in Sweden..
@EuropeanGuy87 The creature we were "before" human was white skinned, humans moved to Afirca at some point and over many years began adapting to the climate, losing hair, growing thicker hair on their head to protect from the sun. Darkening the skin to protect from the hot sun. Then after that, people moved from Africa, and slowly their skin began to return back to white like it was before it turned black for sun protection. Its just adaptation, select breeding, culture(similar behaviors).
@goodwitwood Fucking moron* you mean write genius? You sub human slime do not try and question my intelligence. You probably believe in god! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
So...Darwin's saying that if we get two purely Anglo-Saxon people (male and female), to live on a Central African savannah, they'll not only get an epic tan, but also generate children that evolve into Africans just because they were born on or near the equator, and even if the children mated with like Anglo-Saxon, theyre future generations will evolve into Africans solely because they were born near or on the Equator? Retarded...
White people will not like this video--- race is evolutionary because of natural selection. White people wants to believe that their evolution is saperate and superior from all other people on the planet.
@tristbjorn I do not live in a bubble world. The statement I made is being taught in books in the Chicago Public schools: white people's evolutuion is saperate and superior from other races of people on the planet. If you do not like the word superior, use the other words that are in the books.
@345kevin543 If it says that in school books, then it's some poor books indeed. Do you have the name of that book?
regarding my comment; when you make a blank statement about white people - then it's racism. plain and simple. If you've ever only met white supremacists, then I feel sorry for you.
When you use the term Race, you are talking about Eugenics ( selective breeding ). There is no such thing. Charles Darwin and a few others pushed this crap. It has no basis in the modern world.
@NostepinNofetchin Eugenics was a movement which considered superiority of race and was actually pushed by some other people. Nonetheless, races have evolved in isolation and in this case it is actually said (and that's how selection works) that all races are equally adapted to their evolutionary space. At the same time, we today have vitamin / nutrition supplements and all humans are generally adapting to closed spaces. Peace.
@makkreol My point is, there is no such thing as RACES. Only Nations. Not the man made nations we see today, but the ancient nations of old. Eugenics is still practice in parts of the world ( Planned Parenthood ). Races evolved? What were the races called before the term race? Nations. Because that's where the truth is told. Everyone comes from a progenitor not a race. Where did these bunch of people you call races, come from? People changed because of where they were? Because of climate?
Yes - believe the bullshit of the mass media and educational institutions created and run by the slave masters - Mongrelize yourself and forget the value of the special DNA flowing in your vains. Keep on turning a blind eye of the constant attack and continued encroatchment and eradication of the white race - as they are the ONLY ones to EVER pose a threat to the domination of these slave masters.... Keep on believing the difference is only skin deep ..... and keep on being the slaves you are..
Depigmentation and Re-Pigmentation occurs very rapidly in humans.
Example: Afro-Asiatic people are linguistically closely related to Altaic and Indo-European people, yet some Afro-Asians (Somalis as an example) have relatively darker skin, not as dark as a Nigerian, but quite dark. Meanwhile, Japanese people roughly have the same skin type as Chinese people, but Japanese people are by far more closer related to English people than to Chinese People. And then you also have the Basque, opposite.
A somebody said. "light skin are seen in euro descent" we can tell the somebody hasn't gone out much. Japanese, Koreans , & Northern Chinese have pale / light skin. B/C Europeans & North Eastern Asians are less expose to the sun light .
@b0rnt0shine its not that they haven't gone out much its all about where they adapted to Europe is alot different than Africa so is Asia.Some white people don't tan when they go out so they remain white :P. light skin people get vitamin D from the sun faster and easier than dark skinned people (upside to light skin).darker skinned people get more resistance from sun burn and the sun (advantage to darker skin). we adapt to our environment :) the best way we can.
White skin is only more than seven thousand years, while Asiatic skin is over 40 thousand years old and "African" Skin differs, but its absolute origins is the basis of human beings, but still it differs because during an Ice Age their skin would lighten up significantly. So it is hard to say when current dark skin and current Asian skin truly first appeared.
But nonetheless, White People are actually Asians with light skin. As for hair, Asians originally had red hair and green eyes.
@TheRadicalRyushin No it proven lighter eyes came after brown eyes brown eyes were the original color until some genes mutated thus enable those who didn't have light colored eyes not be able to produce offspring with dark eyes.
@TheRadicalRyushin I'm not assuming you are actually assuming that i am lol which I am not. Darker hair and darker eyes are the natural hair color and eye colors of humans they are not recent mutations sir learn your biology about the human.and next time you try to offend me by calling me an idiot. you need to learn to have respect for others as i have given you respect.
When you say something without confirmation, you are assuming. Be bold for once and admit your imperfection and humanity. I am no god, so don't think I am trying to put you down.
@TheRadicalRyushin okay but white people are European not Asians lol evolution took a different path for white people.and original Asians wouldn't have green eyes or they would still have it because they wouldn't be able to produce brown eye color anymore.when some of the African people went to the deserts some went to Asia and some went to Europe it doesn't go Asians>European its goes pre then it splits into two.learn your science :) and evolution. especially on eyes.
Green eyes as a gene is over 200,000 years old and can be found quite frequently in Asia especially in India, Malaysia, some parts of China, and Central Asia. It is not a European Feature. Even some Arabs and Somalis are found with Green Eyes.
There was a woman from an African country who ran for Miss Universe and she had green eyes.
@TheRadicalRyushin i am not a racist and what am i?I am a human who is mixed with races just so you know so where you coming at your a racist you fail there.
first of all yes Arabs are also Caucasian and so is Indians but they are still called Asians because India is in Asia. everyone with green eyes has a mixed gene (including me i have green eyes.) Do your research on eyes everyone who has blue green or light colored eyes has a similar ancestor :)
You are such a racist and so insecure about being a racist. You are like that guy running for Governor in New York who says he is not against Gays but he will block all attempt for gays to have the right to marry in his state.
@TheRadicalRyushin you have been outsmarted. Quit being a moron learn to keep your mouth shut about things you don't know about. I am not racist and never have i said that i consider any races inferior to my own (which is multiple)and i have never said anything about any other races that could offend them.by calling me a racist you are keeping it alive which you probably didn't know because you IQ is pathetically low.I really feel sorry for you. Calling me a racist doesn't change the facts.
@TheRadicalRyushin you need to learn what you are talking about before you post good sir :) and yes she can be African and heave green eyes I'm sure in Africa they have different colored eyes to.its not about their location its about their genes and you need to learn that. And i am not a racist i mixed with a lot of races and i never said any race is lower than the other. and yes evolution did take a different turn for the different races so dont laugh (trying to ignore that). next time.
@TheRadicalRyushin hubpages.com/hub/The-Origins-of-Green-Eyes there you go you can learn what your talking about now before you comment. :) Good day and just so you know green eyes is not that old because without blue eyes there is no green :) learn your facts before you post something next time.
REAL racists are those who want to disregard race & make some new 1 race that destroys all the existing races & cultures. There is one Human SPECIES with several unique RACES. Skin color (skin being the largest Organ) is just one difference. There are skeletal, chemical, developmental, sexual, emotional, intellectual, cultural, behavioral, genetic disease, musculature differences between all races. Remove all the skin & any forensic scientist can still tell you what race the person is.
The differences between a Chimpanzee and Human are minute/negligible as well. I guess Men and Women are the same as well. Like RACE there is no difference between SEX either. LOL! Your so brainwashed with Jew Communist propaganda you cant see what is in front of your own eyes because you no longer own what is behind the eyes, your brain.
Your like a little doggy who will sit for a bone only with you all one has to do is offer you an A+ for you to repeat after them. You will do it with a proud smile as well. Brainwashed dupe thinks an A+ = Truth, F = Untruth. The teaching/conditioning of the human animal is truly amazing. You are proof of this simple conditioning process.
I love when people try to sound like they know what they're talking about by randomly capitalizing non-proper words-- like "Man" and "Human" and "Chimp." Or throwing in the occasional slash. Oh yes, and it's YOU'RE, not "your," you dumbass.
And just LOL @ "Jew Communist propaganda." LOL indeed.
@parasitesarefunny@GodofCider Yes. there are BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES between races. Thanks for stating the obvious. This is very different from the expectations and assumptions that the masses have placed on this color or that color, however. Christ, that's an entirely different conversation altogether. Differences do not equal more or less value but obviously WE make that so. If you're a racist, good for you. But science is far from proving racism to be "correct".
What happens to a geographic area when the race of people who live their changes? The geographic area is changed by the race of people who now live there. If Blacks move into a white neighborhood the neighborhood eventually goes down. What happens if White people move back into the downtown area of a city? That area gets better. A Mocking Bird cannot make an Eagle's nest, just as Blacks cannot make an Asian society or White society and vice versa. This is NATURAL LAW just like Physics.
@parasitesarefunny Also, people native to the area were living in peace until the so-called white people came along an destroyed their way of life. They were liken to a plague, spreading across the Earth. Stripping people down to basic animals, and then retraining them to be their lap dogs. Teaching lies, hoarding the best of everything, then blaming them (Dark People) for the shortcomings that they ( W.P.) created. And a leopard (W.P.) willnot change its spots. Parasites LOL! PEACE
@NostepinNofetchin Leopards do change spots, there are many color morphs, it's just that the spots make it mimic the environment better and so the color morphs are rare in nature. Anyway, you're right, white people did make a lot of problems during the expansion and this is unfortunately still reflected today. But, I must tell you that Bantu people of Africa also had a strong spread throughout Africa and did the same thing to other nations, so did the Chinese and Mongols etc etc...
@makkreol You are right, people did mimic other people. The damage started by The Greeks conquests, have been unparalleled in history. To compare it to other people's wars is reaching pretty far. PEACE
@NostepinNofetchin I wasn't talking about mimicing. I'm saying that conquests have always been taking place and instead of accusing the offspring of certain groups that have actually lead recent conquests, looking at history obviously shows that most people are descended from these types of groups (excluding only possibly the Jarawa, Ainu and the likes). WHat mrs. Jablonski is saying that all people are adapted to their ancestor's environments and that has nothing to do with racial "purity"
@makkreol No people adapt by putting clothes on. Not changing skin hue, eyes, hair, noses. The Eskimos lived thousand of years in a cold enviorment, but the are still dark. As far as accusing, no it's the truth about what was done. You can't whitewash it. Like most people who benefit from the raping of the world do. It's not certain groups, it's a nation of people who became other nations,by name only. Hence a lepoard. Changing your name doesn't make you different. You are who your father was.
@NostepinNofetchin Ok, so people did change colour of skin due to climate and diet, that's a fact, and due to sexual selection, this is how it was. (Eskimos are dark just as Italians are because they rely heavily on marine food which has vitamin D, thus they can in a sense afford to have darker skin). Yes, and rickets and similar disease are one proof of that (folate defiency as well). Now, what you are saying is half true (India is a good example where racial classification does not apply...
@makkreol No, Italians are dark because of Hannibal. There's no proof that eating Vitamin D makes you dark. And no cilmate has nothing to do with skin color. Color comes from genes, that are dominant or recessive, not cilmate. Skin does'nt change because it's cold. People with light pigmentation migrated to places with less sunlight to protect themselves. And when they went into sunny area's they covered themselves. In India, they consider the darker people "Untouchables". Read up. cont.
@NostepinNofetchin You obviously don't know what you are talking about. Evolution works through genes and traits that are functional in an area work and survive, thus the correlation of sunny and less sunny places. And yes, of course, later on you have the cultural element which doesn't necesseraly relate to climate because we have managed to protect ourselves (no need for selection over skin color).
Vitamin D is definately connected to it, and you can read that up, I'm not going to lecture
@makkreol You said," Eskimo's are dark because they consume fish with Vitamin D." I say,"There is no proof that EATING Vitamin D makes your skin darker". Also, your explanation about skin pigmentation and evolution is flawed, hence the history lesson. Which I noticed....you didn't dispute. So, I guess I do know something. No need to lecture me. Evolution is a Theory based on selection through adaption. Which sounds good if you're so-called White and into Eurgenic's. Again, PEACE
@NostepinNofetchin Lol you are backwards - You produce vitamin D in your skin. At higher latitudes dark skin can't produce enough, so if populations are to succesfully move inland and away from the vitamin D rich food sources of the see, there will be a selection for a lighter skin. If you think that evolution works on the level of the individual you are sadly mistaken.
@tristbjorn Yes, I do produce Vitamin D in my skin, but do you think people back then knew about it? Or were they concerned about skin burn? Getting out of the harse sunlight. Not eating fish ( or anything with vitamin D ) will not make you lighter. You'll most likely have weak bones. LOL. You know there're Nations in Africa that've lived inland since time began,....and they're not lighter. There was to much sun, so your people left there for caves in Europe.
@NostepinNofetchin What you fail to understand is that people DON'T need to know! Those who had a lighter complexion just procreated better in a sunpoor environment! And people living inland in africa is exactly what one would expect because of a stronger sun. What you propose is that people who didn't even know europe existed one day said to them selves "gee it's mighty harsh here in the sun, let's go to this barren frozen north!" And again you say fish won't make you dark! well noone says that
@tristbjorn" People in a sun poor environment, procreate better?" And the name of the place doesn't matter. Are you implying that people with lighter hue, will die out in climates with strong sunlight? If so, right! So they would have to leave for milder climates with less sunlight. Common sense, If the weather is not "agreeing with you, you take cover. It doesn't take a lot of brains. And, it was mentioned about Vitamin D and Fish, and Dark Eskimo's. PEACE
@NostepinNofetchin Damn you are thick - first of, nice missqoute you got there. 2nd try watching the video if you have the mental capability at all. If you can't even Copy-paste, then how am I supposed to have a conversation with you? You keep switching the cause-effect even though it's been made clear to you. whether you are willfully ignorant or just ignorant is not for me to decide, but I'm done wasting time on you.
@tristbjorn No need to insult,......... what you ran out of BS? No need to comment, it's apparent you can,t handle a civil discussion. It is FINISH! PEACE OUT!
@NostepinNofetchin cont. America on some places the same.) So, because of admixture (there is no 100 per cent pure group) now we have a increasingly complex map, but at the same time some sort of differentiation did occur because of isolation (now, all these differences are extremely small). This happens when mutations accumulate and when no mixing is present (Neoithic divided people a lot, you can check it out in the archeological evidence). There is nothing bad about it per sei
@makkreol Correct, in layman terms, ..as people of the same hue migrated to certain areas. They inbred an produced the so-called RACES. The lighter hues came from the darker hues. But,. as I said I disagree with the cilmate changed skin color. People moved where they wanted, they didn't necessary evolve there. If I couldn't stand the sun, I'll move somewhere with less sun,( Europe ) or find some shelter, ( Clothes{Fur?}, Caves ). cont.
@NostepinNofetchin And if the light skinned people thrive better in another climate with less sunlight . then it's the environment that selects for it. You have managed to disagree with your self. Congratulations. And BTW - people just didn't move between continents like we do to day - it too generations for populations to spread across larger areas.
@tristbjorn Wrong! If you move somewhere that is more hospitable to your skin pigmentation, that's not the cilmate changing you...... that's you moving. Are you telling me, they didn't have buses back then? Stop stating the obvious. It's not how, but why they migrated. Skin did not change color ( or loose color ) because of cilmates.
@NostepinNofetchin cont cont. you are asserting cultural values, which change as well, but the biological facts are facts. If you want to know the physionomy of early humans, check out Mathilda's Anthropology Blog (she is constantly putting up research articles) and it is interesting that you can see where and when certain we could call tehm racial traits appear. But these traits are by no means a constraint, they are just there and for me are all very beautiful. Cheers mate.
@makkreol And no again. I believe I'm expressing myself clearly. No culture values,... just facts. Skin pigmentation comes from a progentior,.. not time. Time just makes more of a people, due to procreation. As far as genetic research, one fact remains clear. We all came from an dark hue person, no matter who you are. You can't get dark people out of light people. That's fact. everything else is speculation. PEACE
I am a dark pigmented male, I enjoyed Dr. Nina Jablonski's dissertation on human evolution. We are all related note, we all are branches from a single tree. Learn yourself, love others and use knowledge for positive means.
I'm caucasian, and this crap offends me. The bias agenda behind this study rapes the scientific method. If this woman is so insecure about herself, she has to market her whiteness, this is pathetic.
My question is: Isn't our closest known ancestor out of Asia, not Africa?
This whole need to divide the human race sickens me. These people build arrogance over their broken self-esteem. Who hasn't been hurt? Join the human race again. It's a variable, beautiful species. We are one in species
Are you stupid or just brainwashed? Humans are not a race you idiot but a SPECIES with many UNIQUE RACES just as any other animal group on Earth has. There are different kinds of Turtles, Birds, Bears, Dogs, Cats, Fish and YES DIFFERENT KINDS OF HUMANS as well.
Charles Darwin was influenced by Francis Galton after The Origin of Species. Galton may have had self-interest in trying to connect biology and psychology, and eugenics was the only successful connection between the philosophy and science. However, because of evolution itself, humanity must evolve from a single family blood line. Therefore, no "sub-races" exist. Eugenics is like comparing a pink rose and a yellow rose and deciding which is superior.
This is false, Human came from African Decent .Its a myth created by ignorance to sustain, divide and conquer. It was cold climates that caused pigment change, from darker to lighter, over a wide span of time. . its actually Fear and ignorance that has caused information such as this to come out. . and I believe that the evils in man brought disease to Africa. Life is just a constat battle of truth and ignorance haha.
Not the case. New is just new. Time is the true test on the value of an adaptation. See how superior you feel with a bad sunburn. Different traits are for different environments.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Since im white with light blue eyes, I do feel superior when I see people with brown or black eyes - because blue and green eyes are the fruit of the lastest human evolution - since blue eyes mutation only occured 8000-9000 yrs ago, green even after. What's new its always the best , since evolution make sure the new is always strongerand better adapted.
You are fucking dumbass your the typ of person that should be superior to everyone else caus OF HTE COLOR OF YOUR FUCKIGN EYES you are a dumbass on a new deferent level do you enve know what the fuck you are talkign about? your eyes DONT MEAN SHIT y ou should be Locked up i na dumbster for a week
Yes you're right it is new.and what science or whatever have to look into is what has happened to your brain and mind. Obviously something terrible had happened ,because since your appearance, life itself had only experience destruction. Everywhere this new thing went,destruction was the prominent legacy it left behind.
While intresting in a historical evolutionary sense this is far to simplistic to expalin the subtle and widespread variation of pigment among African people. According to the band of UV light the darkest people should exclusively be in the Hightest UV areas. But these are not the sole factors which contribute to skin color. Simple genetics do also. Over generalized view of African, where there is so much variation which doesn't fit this theory :fulani vs Wolof (same region different skin color)
The various tribes of man are due to variation caused by a loss of genetic information when large family groups split. Evolutionists however must believe that the tribes of man are species, and are automatically racist for it.
! labeling : well not really first is DNA category then it go down to visual inherent anatomy which separates races of all animals but still you can work out region of person then last it goes to family name
That's what I'm saying, what the hell happened to the comments all of the sudden?! This is meant for smart people who are interested in science, not conspiracist theorists sending some pathetic racist message, we got the loonies spewing their hate and nonsense here how sad
There are some people who treat their skin color like some kind of religion, and god help anyone who says that it has a biological rather than divine cause.
Ethnocentrism is one thing but inventing an entire mythology around skin color is either dishonest or crazy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Really listen to this Neo-Nazi btw 19:20 and 20:00. Her choice of words is very telling and alarming. She mention melanin and tries to dismiss it as being nesscary for life. But the truly damning part was her Freudian Slip, she used the word "Termination" and changes and says "Terminology" at 19:54 - 19:47 This is just modern day racism under the guise of Scientific research.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is pure nonesense! At 19:20 she is speaking about early members of the genus Homo having Dark pigmentation in Africa, so there we go. All the pseudo-intellectual tripe before hand was to get to that point to set up a racial hierarchy based on skin pigmentation with peoples of European Descent being at the top. This is nothing more than Social Darwinism, i.e. Eugenics.
If you watch this video below, you'll see a scientist explain how carbon dating is worthless because of it's assumptions and the facts that are ignored by those who use the process. Pay attention.
/watch?v=eKYHwWbvgtw&feature=channel_page
Hominids are adolescent apes. Evolutionists even STILL hoax bones to trey to make them seem like ancestors of man. Watch this and see for yourself:
Dude you are not serious at all. You,ve adopted the system of your fellow Creationist which is " Go from magic to science without proof or critique" hence your disabling of comments on the page mentioned above. Dude, for us open minded scientist you creationist do yourselves no favours. I am yet to see enough papers from "you" for objective testing/critique. I read the one from Dr. Humphreys on carbon dating recently but I could not find any details on methods. pls produce testable evidence.10x
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Carbon dating makes assumptions and ignores key facts which combined render the process worthlessly incapable of dating anything. There is no empirical evidence as to how much carbon could have existed in a stone or fossil in it's beginning. Furthermore, the lithosphere of the earth is sedimentary rock down to an ave. of over 1/2 mile. it is rock created by water (the flood). This fact makes knowing how much carbon could have existed in a rock in the beginning impossible.
Say i agree with you. what method was used to date the earth to be 6000. this same arguement is one Dr. humphreys talked about, but as i said he offered no details of his method so it can be independently verified. it is not enough to say the current method is wrong. you have to prove your methods are right. this idea(esp. by the ID community) that current scientific method is wrong, hence ID is correct is just a fallacy. in science a hypothesis is tested for it to be accepted as valid.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Parentless polonium 218 radiohalos in the granites of the earth verify that those rocks, which is belived to comprise most of the earth, did not cool over long periods, but came into being from absolutely nothing in less than 3.5 minutes (the half-life of p218),
Came out from "absolutely nothing"... Well i guess for a creationist that could pass as science. Even the scientists/evolutionist will not give you that as an explanation :))), for what was before the big bang. Well, i guess that's where they differ from the believe in Magic science though. It's one thing to say we don't know yet or we are not sure, but to assert its from absolutely nothing in less than 3.5minutes. As a start read- There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth? google
When the polonium has no parent, it came from nothing. This discredits the uniformitarianist because all things are proven to have a cause. If the cause is not material, it is immaterial. If it is immaterial, it cannot be nature. If it is not nature, it is supernatural (outside of nature).
Saying we don't know does not help, since it has a cause and the cause cannot be nature.
Here we go again., science cannot explain it yet then it is supernatural. Well, Not to worry, if it true as you claim that the polonium had not parent, one thing i am 100% sure of is that supernatural is not the answer. Even if it contains physic beyond our planet, it is not supernatural.
2. If the ID "believe" this is supernatural, then why would you be pushing to teach this in a science class. Science tries to understand the mysteries of the universe not postulate supernatural experiences
"Soldier savant scholar these are the disciplines of the Ro'ans, these are the works that need to be day in the life. for us religion is science, is art, is war. with the tenant of eternal warfare our banner"
@BolnoyBratchny i don't have anything against the study of evolution or darwins theory
i do however hate the fact that this idiot is trying to do what racists were trying to do with his work
pink albino europeans, had 2 genetic bottlenecks (regressions) the only reason you do not burn in the sun any longer is because you are mulattos (got dark hair? then you!), an extreme degree right next to Albinos for they were you parents.
Yes she did. She also based her entire presentation on a false pretext. She state that blacks have encounter skin limitations near the poles. The truth is Blacks are Universal. She skipped over is the obvious truth, white encounter skin limitation everywhere, including Europe. She gave us their problems. But I am glad to see her give the lecture. It shows the full working of white supremacy to capture the minds of the world. They have only one talent, Deception, and they are very good at it!
well most of these idiots don't even know they just appeared on the planet 6000 years ago (white geneticist) so the euros of 9000 years ago were black LMMFBAO!!!
Fragility of human skin after ape skin being strong can occur via evolution.
You made some assumptions about the skin evolving on its own, not alongside other evolving organs, like our brain, and opposable thumb. Mathematically, brain (+2), opposable thumb (+2), weaker skin ( -1) we end up +3 and evolve in that direction. Maybe we will evolve stronger skin from here, but it seems evolutionary pressure is not for stronger skin.
(-5) inbreeding (-5) loss of melanin (-2)end of proper birthing, (-1)beginning of tailed beasts/(-2)burning in the sun/(-2)hiding in the caves/more(-4) sister fucking
(-10) getting schooled in why it's not good to be a savage
(-20) hunting down and killing the tutor lol
(-50) burning down the great libraries of KMT (Egypt) on some fucking ape shit.
(-1000) destroying the planet in only 380 ... /sigh
And yes they know about The Olmecs but she dont wanna bring that out, she dont wanna mention The Valley Of The Kings, but she think she dropping knowledge with her Calcified Pineal Gland! lol
really informative and interesting
samjenkinssam 3 days ago
some great inforamtion here thanks
ericajjful 5 days ago
love the video man
jjclassjj 5 days ago
really informative and interesting
clairebehun 6 days ago
@ 49:40 snow tan by UBV ( the devolopement of clothing might very well of had play a part in skin pigmentation via as the UBV ray passed threw the clothing made from animal skin etc ) plus In the hot regions of the planet where they would of wore very little to no clothing.. body sweat beading up on the surface of the skin could of create a magnified lens effect as the sun ray entered into the deeper skin layors "Great video topic thanks"
clnmyjts 1 week ago
love the video man
TheSpikeystuff 1 week ago
This is a great video
jayejayeee 1 week ago
i am shamed that human species divides it self based on how much melanolin is in their skin. what is it in us? are we that tribal in nature? why do we insist on favorin or discriminating based on skin? is it fear of being replaced?
gethsoftware 4 months ago
@gethsoftware You need to look deeper and go back much, much further in our evolutionary past. Xenophobia is a built in defense mechanism, just like arachnophobia. And just like arachnophobia it can be overcome, but we need to accept that it is the default mechanism. We are all intolerant of certain groups be they religious,atheist, gay, breeders, socialist, libertarian, etc. I feel the best approach is to accept that fact and work from there and to work for a steady change from everyone.
petmensan 4 months ago
Eugenics Movement is great, mechanisation of the mind. I'm not religious but religion is correct on the fact that we are not apes, these programs are being challenged everyday by people who are prepared to think outside the intellectual whorehouses that teach this robotic mind trance. It's an Ideology like religion, tools to divide and create control. Eugenics is massive today, check Bill Gates out.
itchcitizen2 5 months ago
The incrediable workings of microevolution. We are still human but look so different.
Oty3d 5 months ago
why white people only white shin in Europe, and not in other parts of the world of the same latitude or higher? what about parts of Canada and Alaska that have been inhabbited for a long period of time? they are not white but of medium shin color?
christinehowerton 5 months ago
the inuites, northern exposed people, are covered from head to toe in animal skin...is the face enough skin exposure to keep the skin tanned?
christinehowerton 5 months ago
@christinehowerton look at athabascans, many athabascans are straight up white white, its crazy
OrogDeMalfur 5 months ago
@christinehowerton ok dont look it up, just believe me lol i just googled and saw tan skinned people, but i met a 100% athabascan in school and she was totally white. she retained some of the what i like to call tribal fatness(obesity)
OrogDeMalfur 5 months ago
@USSRxUkrainexRussia Yup. just like the theory of gravity.
goodwitwood 7 months ago
skin cancer has a major effect, Africans who are born with the albinism mutation (common in Tanzania and Kenya) that causes them to have pink skin die young from skin cancer as the melanim that protects their skin cell from UV is lacking. Similarly, pale people survive better in Scandinavian countries, and dark people living in low light areas suffer from vitaminD defieiciency.
However, this population stuff however interesting tell us nothing about how melanin came into being.
stephenhayesuk 8 months ago
@stephenhayesuk It didn't come into being because she's a phenotype-scholar, not a geneticist. (her words :)
TheVainviktor 7 months ago
So, what about bone structure and facial features? What about IQ? This is BULLSHIT!
TheBlackOnWhiteCrime 8 months ago
@TheBlackOnWhiteCrime Stereotyping. I have known black people that look like had white features, chinese features..but they were black. If their skin was light they would just look asian or white. How can you not see this? Sure some black people look like the stereotype, but I went to an all black school once and I am white, they do not all look like the stereotype. Everyone has a different nose, skull, ears. IQ? Cultural practices contribute to intelligence. Not pigmentation level.
fuckcomments 8 months ago 11
@fuckcomments You realize that most African Americans have a good deal of white blood?
thehuntz1 5 months ago
@TheBlackOnWhiteCrime
Fuck you!
goodwitwood 7 months ago
We were a white skinned animal that lost its fur and the skin darkened to compensate, we began walking upright, then our skin faded over the years, similar looking people in this time stuck together. Creating the many different styles of human features. If you believe anything other than that you are simply moronic. We still fight over our differences...
fuckcomments 8 months ago
Comment removed
Natsukashii3 9 months ago
Imagine a red head in the African desert.. it would burn alive --- literally.. so blond people like me and red heads are best suited for climate like here in Sweden..
EuropeanGuy87 9 months ago
@EuropeanGuy87 The creature we were "before" human was white skinned, humans moved to Afirca at some point and over many years began adapting to the climate, losing hair, growing thicker hair on their head to protect from the sun. Darkening the skin to protect from the hot sun. Then after that, people moved from Africa, and slowly their skin began to return back to white like it was before it turned black for sun protection. Its just adaptation, select breeding, culture(similar behaviors).
fuckcomments 8 months ago
@fuckcomments I like this theory ..
EuropeanGuy87 8 months ago
@fuckcomments where is the cradle of mankind? bc i would like to read abt it.
fanatic709 8 months ago
@fuckcomments
Fucken moooooooron.
goodwitwood 7 months ago
@goodwitwood Fucking moron* you mean write genius? You sub human slime do not try and question my intelligence. You probably believe in god! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
fuckcomments 6 months ago
So...Darwin's saying that if we get two purely Anglo-Saxon people (male and female), to live on a Central African savannah, they'll not only get an epic tan, but also generate children that evolve into Africans just because they were born on or near the equator, and even if the children mated with like Anglo-Saxon, theyre future generations will evolve into Africans solely because they were born near or on the Equator? Retarded...
sycan1990 9 months ago
schools books lie to you to keep you ignorant
ronan32 9 months ago
White people will not like this video--- race is evolutionary because of natural selection. White people wants to believe that their evolution is saperate and superior from all other people on the planet.
345kevin543 11 months ago
@345kevin543 Nice racism you got going there!
tristbjorn 10 months ago
@tristbjorn I do not live in a bubble world. The statement I made is being taught in books in the Chicago Public schools: white people's evolutuion is saperate and superior from other races of people on the planet. If you do not like the word superior, use the other words that are in the books.
345kevin543 10 months ago
@345kevin543 If it says that in school books, then it's some poor books indeed. Do you have the name of that book?
regarding my comment; when you make a blank statement about white people - then it's racism. plain and simple. If you've ever only met white supremacists, then I feel sorry for you.
tristbjorn 10 months ago
@345kevin543 not all white people.this speaker is proof
juseph29 9 months ago
this is fake. god made everything. agree with me or ill be offended.
jeevs182 11 months ago
When you use the term Race, you are talking about Eugenics ( selective breeding ). There is no such thing. Charles Darwin and a few others pushed this crap. It has no basis in the modern world.
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin Eugenics was a movement which considered superiority of race and was actually pushed by some other people. Nonetheless, races have evolved in isolation and in this case it is actually said (and that's how selection works) that all races are equally adapted to their evolutionary space. At the same time, we today have vitamin / nutrition supplements and all humans are generally adapting to closed spaces. Peace.
makkreol 11 months ago
@makkreol My point is, there is no such thing as RACES. Only Nations. Not the man made nations we see today, but the ancient nations of old. Eugenics is still practice in parts of the world ( Planned Parenthood ). Races evolved? What were the races called before the term race? Nations. Because that's where the truth is told. Everyone comes from a progenitor not a race. Where did these bunch of people you call races, come from? People changed because of where they were? Because of climate?
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
Great video. Brilliant woman!
goddessnadiya 1 year ago 2
Yes - believe the bullshit of the mass media and educational institutions created and run by the slave masters - Mongrelize yourself and forget the value of the special DNA flowing in your vains. Keep on turning a blind eye of the constant attack and continued encroatchment and eradication of the white race - as they are the ONLY ones to EVER pose a threat to the domination of these slave masters.... Keep on believing the difference is only skin deep ..... and keep on being the slaves you are..
longeryounger9 1 year ago
All Euro-Centrist and Afro-Centrist people should be forced to watch this video.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago 17
@TheRadicalRyushin indeed, and racists should be forced to watch 46:50 - 47:43 in particular.
iobroful 3 months ago
@TheRadicalRyushin look up on youtube All NON-Africans are Neanderthal Hybrids
the video you're watching now is bullshit
XxRaliXx 1 week ago
Depigmentation and Re-Pigmentation occurs very rapidly in humans.
Example: Afro-Asiatic people are linguistically closely related to Altaic and Indo-European people, yet some Afro-Asians (Somalis as an example) have relatively darker skin, not as dark as a Nigerian, but quite dark. Meanwhile, Japanese people roughly have the same skin type as Chinese people, but Japanese people are by far more closer related to English people than to Chinese People. And then you also have the Basque, opposite.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
A somebody said. "light skin are seen in euro descent" we can tell the somebody hasn't gone out much. Japanese, Koreans , & Northern Chinese have pale / light skin. B/C Europeans & North Eastern Asians are less expose to the sun light .
b0rnt0shine 1 year ago
@b0rnt0shine its not that they haven't gone out much its all about where they adapted to Europe is alot different than Africa so is Asia.Some white people don't tan when they go out so they remain white :P. light skin people get vitamin D from the sun faster and easier than dark skinned people (upside to light skin).darker skinned people get more resistance from sun burn and the sun (advantage to darker skin). we adapt to our environment :) the best way we can.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
White skin is only more than seven thousand years, while Asiatic skin is over 40 thousand years old and "African" Skin differs, but its absolute origins is the basis of human beings, but still it differs because during an Ice Age their skin would lighten up significantly. So it is hard to say when current dark skin and current Asian skin truly first appeared.
But nonetheless, White People are actually Asians with light skin. As for hair, Asians originally had red hair and green eyes.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
Darker hair and darker eyes are more recent mutations like light skin.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin No it proven lighter eyes came after brown eyes brown eyes were the original color until some genes mutated thus enable those who didn't have light colored eyes not be able to produce offspring with dark eyes.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
I never said brown eyes came before lighter eyes. I am saying that mutation is frequent.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
Next time you talk, ask for information instead of assuming like an idiot. You are an idiot by the way and totally deserve that.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin I'm not assuming you are actually assuming that i am lol which I am not. Darker hair and darker eyes are the natural hair color and eye colors of humans they are not recent mutations sir learn your biology about the human.and next time you try to offend me by calling me an idiot. you need to learn to have respect for others as i have given you respect.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
When you say something without confirmation, you are assuming. Be bold for once and admit your imperfection and humanity. I am no god, so don't think I am trying to put you down.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin okay but white people are European not Asians lol evolution took a different path for white people.and original Asians wouldn't have green eyes or they would still have it because they wouldn't be able to produce brown eye color anymore.when some of the African people went to the deserts some went to Asia and some went to Europe it doesn't go Asians>European its goes pre then it splits into two.learn your science :) and evolution. especially on eyes.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are White people who are not European.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
You are extremely racist.
"Haha evolution took a different turn... hahaha"
What are you?
Green eyes as a gene is over 200,000 years old and can be found quite frequently in Asia especially in India, Malaysia, some parts of China, and Central Asia. It is not a European Feature. Even some Arabs and Somalis are found with Green Eyes.
There was a woman from an African country who ran for Miss Universe and she had green eyes.
It is a frequent mutation.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin i am not a racist and what am i?I am a human who is mixed with races just so you know so where you coming at your a racist you fail there.
first of all yes Arabs are also Caucasian and so is Indians but they are still called Asians because India is in Asia. everyone with green eyes has a mixed gene (including me i have green eyes.) Do your research on eyes everyone who has blue green or light colored eyes has a similar ancestor :)
lordtusk666 1 year ago
You are such a racist and so insecure about being a racist. You are like that guy running for Governor in New York who says he is not against Gays but he will block all attempt for gays to have the right to marry in his state.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin you have been outsmarted. Quit being a moron learn to keep your mouth shut about things you don't know about. I am not racist and never have i said that i consider any races inferior to my own (which is multiple)and i have never said anything about any other races that could offend them.by calling me a racist you are keeping it alive which you probably didn't know because you IQ is pathetically low.I really feel sorry for you. Calling me a racist doesn't change the facts.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
Hmm narcissism.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin i have no ego so move on and quit trolling me -.-
lordtusk666 1 year ago
You are the one trolling.
"you have been outsmarted."
Evidence you were trolling.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin you need to learn what you are talking about before you post good sir :) and yes she can be African and heave green eyes I'm sure in Africa they have different colored eyes to.its not about their location its about their genes and you need to learn that. And i am not a racist i mixed with a lot of races and i never said any race is lower than the other. and yes evolution did take a different turn for the different races so dont laugh (trying to ignore that). next time.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
You know suggesting nominal information with non-nominal information is quite unscientific, don't you think?
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
@TheRadicalRyushin hubpages.com/hub/The-Origins-of-Green-Eyes there you go you can learn what your talking about now before you comment. :) Good day and just so you know green eyes is not that old because without blue eyes there is no green :) learn your facts before you post something next time.
lordtusk666 1 year ago
You need something with actual credibility. Nice try. :)
"Learn your facts."
Learn not to be a hypocrite.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
REAL racists are those who want to disregard race & make some new 1 race that destroys all the existing races & cultures. There is one Human SPECIES with several unique RACES. Skin color (skin being the largest Organ) is just one difference. There are skeletal, chemical, developmental, sexual, emotional, intellectual, cultural, behavioral, genetic disease, musculature differences between all races. Remove all the skin & any forensic scientist can still tell you what race the person is.
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
So as the factual physical evidence proves, RACE is more than just OUTSIDE appearances but INTERNAL factual differences as well.
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny At best humanity is a compilation of superficial subspecies, at worst, the differences are so minute as to be almost negligible.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@GodofCider
The differences between a Chimpanzee and Human are minute/negligible as well. I guess Men and Women are the same as well. Like RACE there is no difference between SEX either. LOL! Your so brainwashed with Jew Communist propaganda you cant see what is in front of your own eyes because you no longer own what is behind the eyes, your brain.
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny o_O Do you ever stop and actually read what it is that you're typing? It's a good habit.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@GodofCider
Your like a little doggy who will sit for a bone only with you all one has to do is offer you an A+ for you to repeat after them. You will do it with a proud smile as well. Brainwashed dupe thinks an A+ = Truth, F = Untruth. The teaching/conditioning of the human animal is truly amazing. You are proof of this simple conditioning process.
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny You sad troll.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny
I love when people try to sound like they know what they're talking about by randomly capitalizing non-proper words-- like "Man" and "Human" and "Chimp." Or throwing in the occasional slash. Oh yes, and it's YOU'RE, not "your," you dumbass.
And just LOL @ "Jew Communist propaganda." LOL indeed.
littlebier8 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny @GodofCider Yes. there are BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES between races. Thanks for stating the obvious. This is very different from the expectations and assumptions that the masses have placed on this color or that color, however. Christ, that's an entirely different conversation altogether. Differences do not equal more or less value but obviously WE make that so. If you're a racist, good for you. But science is far from proving racism to be "correct".
beesfeet 1 year ago
What happens to a geographic area when the race of people who live their changes? The geographic area is changed by the race of people who now live there. If Blacks move into a white neighborhood the neighborhood eventually goes down. What happens if White people move back into the downtown area of a city? That area gets better. A Mocking Bird cannot make an Eagle's nest, just as Blacks cannot make an Asian society or White society and vice versa. This is NATURAL LAW just like Physics.
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny This post is barbaric.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@parasitesarefunny Also, people native to the area were living in peace until the so-called white people came along an destroyed their way of life. They were liken to a plague, spreading across the Earth. Stripping people down to basic animals, and then retraining them to be their lap dogs. Teaching lies, hoarding the best of everything, then blaming them (Dark People) for the shortcomings that they ( W.P.) created. And a leopard (W.P.) willnot change its spots. Parasites LOL! PEACE
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin Leopards do change spots, there are many color morphs, it's just that the spots make it mimic the environment better and so the color morphs are rare in nature. Anyway, you're right, white people did make a lot of problems during the expansion and this is unfortunately still reflected today. But, I must tell you that Bantu people of Africa also had a strong spread throughout Africa and did the same thing to other nations, so did the Chinese and Mongols etc etc...
makkreol 11 months ago
@makkreol You are right, people did mimic other people. The damage started by The Greeks conquests, have been unparalleled in history. To compare it to other people's wars is reaching pretty far. PEACE
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin I wasn't talking about mimicing. I'm saying that conquests have always been taking place and instead of accusing the offspring of certain groups that have actually lead recent conquests, looking at history obviously shows that most people are descended from these types of groups (excluding only possibly the Jarawa, Ainu and the likes). WHat mrs. Jablonski is saying that all people are adapted to their ancestor's environments and that has nothing to do with racial "purity"
makkreol 11 months ago
@makkreol No people adapt by putting clothes on. Not changing skin hue, eyes, hair, noses. The Eskimos lived thousand of years in a cold enviorment, but the are still dark. As far as accusing, no it's the truth about what was done. You can't whitewash it. Like most people who benefit from the raping of the world do. It's not certain groups, it's a nation of people who became other nations,by name only. Hence a lepoard. Changing your name doesn't make you different. You are who your father was.
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin Ok, so people did change colour of skin due to climate and diet, that's a fact, and due to sexual selection, this is how it was. (Eskimos are dark just as Italians are because they rely heavily on marine food which has vitamin D, thus they can in a sense afford to have darker skin). Yes, and rickets and similar disease are one proof of that (folate defiency as well). Now, what you are saying is half true (India is a good example where racial classification does not apply...
makkreol 11 months ago
Comment removed
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@makkreol No, Italians are dark because of Hannibal. There's no proof that eating Vitamin D makes you dark. And no cilmate has nothing to do with skin color. Color comes from genes, that are dominant or recessive, not cilmate. Skin does'nt change because it's cold. People with light pigmentation migrated to places with less sunlight to protect themselves. And when they went into sunny area's they covered themselves. In India, they consider the darker people "Untouchables". Read up. cont.
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin You obviously don't know what you are talking about. Evolution works through genes and traits that are functional in an area work and survive, thus the correlation of sunny and less sunny places. And yes, of course, later on you have the cultural element which doesn't necesseraly relate to climate because we have managed to protect ourselves (no need for selection over skin color).
Vitamin D is definately connected to it, and you can read that up, I'm not going to lecture
makkreol 11 months ago
@makkreol You said," Eskimo's are dark because they consume fish with Vitamin D." I say,"There is no proof that EATING Vitamin D makes your skin darker". Also, your explanation about skin pigmentation and evolution is flawed, hence the history lesson. Which I noticed....you didn't dispute. So, I guess I do know something. No need to lecture me. Evolution is a Theory based on selection through adaption. Which sounds good if you're so-called White and into Eurgenic's. Again, PEACE
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin Lol you are backwards - You produce vitamin D in your skin. At higher latitudes dark skin can't produce enough, so if populations are to succesfully move inland and away from the vitamin D rich food sources of the see, there will be a selection for a lighter skin. If you think that evolution works on the level of the individual you are sadly mistaken.
tristbjorn 10 months ago
@tristbjorn Yes, I do produce Vitamin D in my skin, but do you think people back then knew about it? Or were they concerned about skin burn? Getting out of the harse sunlight. Not eating fish ( or anything with vitamin D ) will not make you lighter. You'll most likely have weak bones. LOL. You know there're Nations in Africa that've lived inland since time began,....and they're not lighter. There was to much sun, so your people left there for caves in Europe.
NostepinNofetchin 10 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin What you fail to understand is that people DON'T need to know! Those who had a lighter complexion just procreated better in a sunpoor environment! And people living inland in africa is exactly what one would expect because of a stronger sun. What you propose is that people who didn't even know europe existed one day said to them selves "gee it's mighty harsh here in the sun, let's go to this barren frozen north!" And again you say fish won't make you dark! well noone says that
tristbjorn 10 months ago
@tristbjorn" People in a sun poor environment, procreate better?" And the name of the place doesn't matter. Are you implying that people with lighter hue, will die out in climates with strong sunlight? If so, right! So they would have to leave for milder climates with less sunlight. Common sense, If the weather is not "agreeing with you, you take cover. It doesn't take a lot of brains. And, it was mentioned about Vitamin D and Fish, and Dark Eskimo's. PEACE
NostepinNofetchin 10 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin Damn you are thick - first of, nice missqoute you got there. 2nd try watching the video if you have the mental capability at all. If you can't even Copy-paste, then how am I supposed to have a conversation with you? You keep switching the cause-effect even though it's been made clear to you. whether you are willfully ignorant or just ignorant is not for me to decide, but I'm done wasting time on you.
tristbjorn 10 months ago
@tristbjorn No need to insult,......... what you ran out of BS? No need to comment, it's apparent you can,t handle a civil discussion. It is FINISH! PEACE OUT!
NostepinNofetchin 10 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin cont. America on some places the same.) So, because of admixture (there is no 100 per cent pure group) now we have a increasingly complex map, but at the same time some sort of differentiation did occur because of isolation (now, all these differences are extremely small). This happens when mutations accumulate and when no mixing is present (Neoithic divided people a lot, you can check it out in the archeological evidence). There is nothing bad about it per sei
makkreol 11 months ago
@makkreol Correct, in layman terms, ..as people of the same hue migrated to certain areas. They inbred an produced the so-called RACES. The lighter hues came from the darker hues. But,. as I said I disagree with the cilmate changed skin color. People moved where they wanted, they didn't necessary evolve there. If I couldn't stand the sun, I'll move somewhere with less sun,( Europe ) or find some shelter, ( Clothes{Fur?}, Caves ). cont.
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin And if the light skinned people thrive better in another climate with less sunlight . then it's the environment that selects for it. You have managed to disagree with your self. Congratulations. And BTW - people just didn't move between continents like we do to day - it too generations for populations to spread across larger areas.
tristbjorn 10 months ago
@tristbjorn Wrong! If you move somewhere that is more hospitable to your skin pigmentation, that's not the cilmate changing you...... that's you moving. Are you telling me, they didn't have buses back then? Stop stating the obvious. It's not how, but why they migrated. Skin did not change color ( or loose color ) because of cilmates.
NostepinNofetchin 10 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin cont cont. you are asserting cultural values, which change as well, but the biological facts are facts. If you want to know the physionomy of early humans, check out Mathilda's Anthropology Blog (she is constantly putting up research articles) and it is interesting that you can see where and when certain we could call tehm racial traits appear. But these traits are by no means a constraint, they are just there and for me are all very beautiful. Cheers mate.
makkreol 11 months ago
@makkreol And no again. I believe I'm expressing myself clearly. No culture values,... just facts. Skin pigmentation comes from a progentior,.. not time. Time just makes more of a people, due to procreation. As far as genetic research, one fact remains clear. We all came from an dark hue person, no matter who you are. You can't get dark people out of light people. That's fact. everything else is speculation. PEACE
NostepinNofetchin 11 months ago
@NostepinNofetchin cont. which you suggested in your comment of eugenics. (if I understood correctly)
makkreol 11 months ago
I am a dark pigmented male, I enjoyed Dr. Nina Jablonski's dissertation on human evolution. We are all related note, we all are branches from a single tree. Learn yourself, love others and use knowledge for positive means.
pappo316 1 year ago
i dont see anything racist here so i am going t assume that either you all didnt watch it or you all just lack the capability to cromprehend things.
jasonsacrifice1 1 year ago
Comment removed
grownman455 1 year ago
this is true, not racist
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
I'm caucasian, and this crap offends me. The bias agenda behind this study rapes the scientific method. If this woman is so insecure about herself, she has to market her whiteness, this is pathetic.
My question is: Isn't our closest known ancestor out of Asia, not Africa?
This whole need to divide the human race sickens me. These people build arrogance over their broken self-esteem. Who hasn't been hurt? Join the human race again. It's a variable, beautiful species. We are one in species
riverlioness 1 year ago
@riverlioness we are one species with different races thats all
MrNinjaSpartan 1 year ago
@MrNinjaSpartan am of the human race, what race are you?
NewBaldwin 1 year ago
@NewBaldwin
Are you stupid or just brainwashed? Humans are not a race you idiot but a SPECIES with many UNIQUE RACES just as any other animal group on Earth has. There are different kinds of Turtles, Birds, Bears, Dogs, Cats, Fish and YES DIFFERENT KINDS OF HUMANS as well.
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
Charles Darwin was influenced by Francis Galton after The Origin of Species. Galton may have had self-interest in trying to connect biology and psychology, and eugenics was the only successful connection between the philosophy and science. However, because of evolution itself, humanity must evolve from a single family blood line. Therefore, no "sub-races" exist. Eugenics is like comparing a pink rose and a yellow rose and deciding which is superior.
riverlioness 1 year ago
This is false, Human came from African Decent .Its a myth created by ignorance to sustain, divide and conquer. It was cold climates that caused pigment change, from darker to lighter, over a wide span of time. . its actually Fear and ignorance that has caused information such as this to come out. . and I believe that the evils in man brought disease to Africa. Life is just a constat battle of truth and ignorance haha.
EDIflowerz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not the case. New is just new. Time is the true test on the value of an adaptation. See how superior you feel with a bad sunburn. Different traits are for different environments.
LittleShellChippewa 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Since im white with light blue eyes, I do feel superior when I see people with brown or black eyes - because blue and green eyes are the fruit of the lastest human evolution - since blue eyes mutation only occured 8000-9000 yrs ago, green even after. What's new its always the best , since evolution make sure the new is always strongerand better adapted.
WWPSdvia 1 year ago
Take those "new" traits and place them in an enviornment not favoring them and see how "better" they are.
HybridD91 1 year ago 8
lol you owned him
Viruspirate 1 year ago
@Viruspirate
It wasn't hard lol.
HybridD91 1 year ago
You are fucking dumbass your the typ of person that should be superior to everyone else caus OF HTE COLOR OF YOUR FUCKIGN EYES you are a dumbass on a new deferent level do you enve know what the fuck you are talkign about? your eyes DONT MEAN SHIT y ou should be Locked up i na dumbster for a week
amartinez97 1 year ago
Yes you're right it is new.and what science or whatever have to look into is what has happened to your brain and mind. Obviously something terrible had happened ,because since your appearance, life itself had only experience destruction. Everywhere this new thing went,destruction was the prominent legacy it left behind.
khufu65 1 year ago
Comment removed
LittleShellChippewa 1 year ago
Comment removed
cjd1276 2 years ago
@cjd1276 do you go to LSU
anonymous0437 2 years ago
Comment removed
cjd1276 2 years ago
Comment removed
cjd1276 2 years ago
While intresting in a historical evolutionary sense this is far to simplistic to expalin the subtle and widespread variation of pigment among African people. According to the band of UV light the darkest people should exclusively be in the Hightest UV areas. But these are not the sole factors which contribute to skin color. Simple genetics do also. Over generalized view of African, where there is so much variation which doesn't fit this theory :fulani vs Wolof (same region different skin color)
Ocacia 2 years ago
@SFC236 hey lumpen! do you think that she didn't know that before she became scientist, even you seems you know it all, didn't you?
kurchif 2 years ago
She seems to say the skin came as a result of the sun. Think about this: What if the sun came as a result of the skin?
David19154 2 years ago
The various tribes of man are due to variation caused by a loss of genetic information when large family groups split. Evolutionists however must believe that the tribes of man are species, and are automatically racist for it.
NephilimFree 2 years ago
So I guess 236 stands for the number of braincells you apparently have.
JRBendixen 2 years ago
uv is a radiation from the sun not the brightness of light you nonce
okuma0kuma 2 years ago
Every human on earth is related NO further than 50th cousin.
Psy0pAgent 2 years ago
! labeling : well not really first is DNA category then it go down to visual inherent anatomy which separates races of all animals but still you can work out region of person then last it goes to family name
okuma0kuma 2 years ago
This video really brought out the sociopaths with inferiority complexes didn't it?
fegu 2 years ago 5
How utterly ironic.
fegu 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol @ black supremists calling her a white supremist.
ghjjfsbf 2 years ago 6
That's what I'm saying, what the hell happened to the comments all of the sudden?! This is meant for smart people who are interested in science, not conspiracist theorists sending some pathetic racist message, we got the loonies spewing their hate and nonsense here how sad
fegu 2 years ago 7
Exactly.
There are some people who treat their skin color like some kind of religion, and god help anyone who says that it has a biological rather than divine cause.
Ethnocentrism is one thing but inventing an entire mythology around skin color is either dishonest or crazy.
ghjjfsbf 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Really listen to this Neo-Nazi btw 19:20 and 20:00. Her choice of words is very telling and alarming. She mention melanin and tries to dismiss it as being nesscary for life. But the truly damning part was her Freudian Slip, she used the word "Termination" and changes and says "Terminology" at 19:54 - 19:47 This is just modern day racism under the guise of Scientific research.
vairocana23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is pure nonesense! At 19:20 she is speaking about early members of the genus Homo having Dark pigmentation in Africa, so there we go. All the pseudo-intellectual tripe before hand was to get to that point to set up a racial hierarchy based on skin pigmentation with peoples of European Descent being at the top. This is nothing more than Social Darwinism, i.e. Eugenics.
vairocana23 2 years ago
If you watch this video below, you'll see a scientist explain how carbon dating is worthless because of it's assumptions and the facts that are ignored by those who use the process. Pay attention.
/watch?v=eKYHwWbvgtw&feature=channel_page
Hominids are adolescent apes. Evolutionists even STILL hoax bones to trey to make them seem like ancestors of man. Watch this and see for yourself:
/watch?v=ftxrJbqFchw&feature=channel_page
NephilimFree 2 years ago
Dude you are not serious at all. You,ve adopted the system of your fellow Creationist which is " Go from magic to science without proof or critique" hence your disabling of comments on the page mentioned above. Dude, for us open minded scientist you creationist do yourselves no favours. I am yet to see enough papers from "you" for objective testing/critique. I read the one from Dr. Humphreys on carbon dating recently but I could not find any details on methods. pls produce testable evidence.10x
oneki 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Carbon dating makes assumptions and ignores key facts which combined render the process worthlessly incapable of dating anything. There is no empirical evidence as to how much carbon could have existed in a stone or fossil in it's beginning. Furthermore, the lithosphere of the earth is sedimentary rock down to an ave. of over 1/2 mile. it is rock created by water (the flood). This fact makes knowing how much carbon could have existed in a rock in the beginning impossible.
NephilimFree 2 years ago
Say i agree with you. what method was used to date the earth to be 6000. this same arguement is one Dr. humphreys talked about, but as i said he offered no details of his method so it can be independently verified. it is not enough to say the current method is wrong. you have to prove your methods are right. this idea(esp. by the ID community) that current scientific method is wrong, hence ID is correct is just a fallacy. in science a hypothesis is tested for it to be accepted as valid.
oneki 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Parentless polonium 218 radiohalos in the granites of the earth verify that those rocks, which is belived to comprise most of the earth, did not cool over long periods, but came into being from absolutely nothing in less than 3.5 minutes (the half-life of p218),
NephilimFree 2 years ago
Came out from "absolutely nothing"... Well i guess for a creationist that could pass as science. Even the scientists/evolutionist will not give you that as an explanation :))), for what was before the big bang. Well, i guess that's where they differ from the believe in Magic science though. It's one thing to say we don't know yet or we are not sure, but to assert its from absolutely nothing in less than 3.5minutes. As a start read- There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth? google
oneki 2 years ago
When the polonium has no parent, it came from nothing. This discredits the uniformitarianist because all things are proven to have a cause. If the cause is not material, it is immaterial. If it is immaterial, it cannot be nature. If it is not nature, it is supernatural (outside of nature).
Saying we don't know does not help, since it has a cause and the cause cannot be nature.
NephilimFree 2 years ago
Here we go again., science cannot explain it yet then it is supernatural. Well, Not to worry, if it true as you claim that the polonium had not parent, one thing i am 100% sure of is that supernatural is not the answer. Even if it contains physic beyond our planet, it is not supernatural.
2. If the ID "believe" this is supernatural, then why would you be pushing to teach this in a science class. Science tries to understand the mysteries of the universe not postulate supernatural experiences
oneki 2 years ago 3
Science can determine is nature is capable of a thing or if it is not.
NephilimFree 2 years ago
So you can tell me how much C-14 was in an animal before it died by telling me how much has decated?
What are you going to do about the carbon that got into the animal after it died by the water?
lol
NephilimFree 2 years ago
We all know you are the morons moron. So there was no need to proof it again.
JRBendixen 2 years ago
love the eskimo explanation, so high in BS i am in shock
Azzaiel 2 years ago
stupid woman, we love the sun, sunscreen my ass
btw genius explain the Eskimos? very dark skin
Azzaiel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you all are completely overestimating the intelligence of whites. notice she is attempting to improve the already proven bullshit theory of Darwin.
hence, she really is this stupid
Azzaiel 2 years ago
Let me quote your channel info:
"Soldier savant scholar these are the disciplines of the Ro'ans, these are the works that need to be day in the life. for us religion is science, is art, is war. with the tenant of eternal warfare our banner"
You do know that none of that made any sense?
JRBendixen 2 years ago
and for you it should never make sense, sorta the point albino
Azzaiel 2 years ago
D8
this would be awesome if science didn't have to correct their beliefs every couple years because better computers disprove their "beliefs"
LMAO!!
thats the one constant about science .. always wrong.
Azzaiel 2 years ago
I´m actually surprised that you were able be write the comment in a comprehensible way. And yes, your channel is that moronic.
JRBendixen 2 years ago
why? because of your ignorance? or lack of realistic information?
Azzaiel 2 years ago
99.98% of the scientific community accepts Darwin's theory of evolution.
That's no coincidence
BolnoyBratchny 2 years ago
@BolnoyBratchny
i agree albino
Azzaiel 2 years ago
@BolnoyBratchny i don't have anything against the study of evolution or darwins theory
i do however hate the fact that this idiot is trying to do what racists were trying to do with his work
pink albino europeans, had 2 genetic bottlenecks (regressions) the only reason you do not burn in the sun any longer is because you are mulattos (got dark hair? then you!), an extreme degree right next to Albinos for they were you parents.
Azzaiel 2 years ago
Wow!!! White supremacy at its greatest!!!
PremierLegend 2 years ago
did she just say whites are neanderthals?
Azzaiel 2 years ago
Yes she did. She also based her entire presentation on a false pretext. She state that blacks have encounter skin limitations near the poles. The truth is Blacks are Universal. She skipped over is the obvious truth, white encounter skin limitation everywhere, including Europe. She gave us their problems. But I am glad to see her give the lecture. It shows the full working of white supremacy to capture the minds of the world. They have only one talent, Deception, and they are very good at it!
PremierLegend 2 years ago
well more of us are waking up and actually reading our histories, she is a lame attempt at intelligence.
even subconsciously she knows albinism is a bitch lol
Azzaiel 2 years ago
well most of these idiots don't even know they just appeared on the planet 6000 years ago (white geneticist) so the euros of 9000 years ago were black LMMFBAO!!!
Azzaiel 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fragility of human skin after ape skin being strong can occur via evolution.
You made some assumptions about the skin evolving on its own, not alongside other evolving organs, like our brain, and opposable thumb. Mathematically, brain (+2), opposable thumb (+2), weaker skin ( -1) we end up +3 and evolve in that direction. Maybe we will evolve stronger skin from here, but it seems evolutionary pressure is not for stronger skin.
adolthitler 2 years ago
(-5) inbreeding (-5) loss of melanin (-2)end of proper birthing, (-1)beginning of tailed beasts/(-2)burning in the sun/(-2)hiding in the caves/more(-4) sister fucking
(-10) getting schooled in why it's not good to be a savage
(-20) hunting down and killing the tutor lol
(-50) burning down the great libraries of KMT (Egypt) on some fucking ape shit.
(-1000) destroying the planet in only 380 ... /sigh
Azzaiel 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Does this cracka know about the OLMECS! All black people in America did'nt come off no slave ship. We were already here BITCH!
chink34 2 years ago
Brother! I bang on that damn Beats daily!
And yes they know about The Olmecs but she dont wanna bring that out, she dont wanna mention The Valley Of The Kings, but she think she dropping knowledge with her Calcified Pineal Gland! lol
NegroXFile 2 years ago