@emecollegevideos This version has an option to display extra decimals if they fit. You don't honestly think this mouse movement looks sped up 10 times, though, do you? lmao
@cardologist Basically, the original Minesweeper started at 1 and counted up (always displaying the time rounded down, plus one), and when clones were developed that started counting time in decimals, they kept that behavior for the counter at the top. So a 49.xx is considered a 50 (not sub50) and a 48.xx is considered a 49 (sub50). It's a bit weird, but it does ensure that the barrier has been consistent over time.
I am the only one who noticed it took this guy 487 seconds?
emecollegevideos 1 week ago
@emecollegevideos This version has an option to display extra decimals if they fit. You don't honestly think this mouse movement looks sped up 10 times, though, do you? lmao
qqwref2 1 week ago
@qqwref2 right, I see it now
emecollegevideos 1 week ago
very impressive!
ibasicallytotalyrule 8 months ago
woah..nice one
gingerman2408 1 year ago
What are those historical reasons?
cardologist 1 year ago
@cardologist Basically, the original Minesweeper started at 1 and counted up (always displaying the time rounded down, plus one), and when clones were developed that started counting time in decimals, they kept that behavior for the counter at the top. So a 49.xx is considered a 50 (not sub50) and a 48.xx is considered a 49 (sub50). It's a bit weird, but it does ensure that the barrier has been consistent over time.
qqwref2 1 year ago
You're crazy.
and I have no idea how you can do this so fast.
FitCuber65 1 year ago