@EKrassner90 There are many books of Enoch that are lies; however, there's is an authentic book of Enoch found within the dead sea scrolls along with the book of Isiah in which give credence to the bible.
@david1057 just read the book of genesis, angles did put on human flesh, just ask Abraham, he feed them and wash their feet aswell, now we know that you can not wash a spirit's feet? and the men of sodom and gomorrah thought they were rugular men. so that's where your wrong.
@benjudah71 Do not confuse the fact that angels can be transformed in order to appear human looking, with actually embodying a human body. Angels are not of human flesh but can appear that way or any way they chose to. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 2 Corinthians 11:14
The book of Enoch is very important because as you can see in our bibles we dont have the complete books about Enoch,That's why in the book of Enoch it says that it is for a remote generation concerning the elect ones that will be living in the time of tribulation. I think that bad times are coming and tribulations,so we need to get ready and get right with our judge.We need to get ready and think about that day when we get to stand infront of God.
@billenh Demons are spirit beings, in which means they are disembodied from their Nephelim flesh. Angels on the other hand, suppose to be spiritual beings as far as not going after the flesh, but walking in the spirit. They do however have a body, not as our body, but nevertheless a body.
There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
That person reading the book, has a good voice. I wish he did some science audio books, I would buy them. I could use them in studying evolution, and Quantum Mechanics. David1057, who is that, may I ask. Thanks for your time.
Should we take the book of Enoch as a biblical foundation, because many scholars deny it is. I am not a Christian, but I find theology interesting. I do not believe in the book of Enoch, as a literal story, but a metaphor such as the Story of the Garden of Eden or the Flood.I see many things in the bible as metaphors such as Satan, Demons, and so on. You are knowledgeable in these areas David1057, so your perspective would help.The bible is around 2000-3000 years old, and as I can see it..
@KevZen2000 Many scholars deny it because this book was meant to be hidden until our generation. Scholars are not the final authority in God's affair, God is. This book was considered scripture in the Old Testament & was quoted by Peter & Jude in the bible. The phrase Son of man & the elected one stated in the book of Enoch, were references to Jesus & prophecies of his coming Kingdom.
Thanks. I will look more into it. I have always wondered about the Book of Enoch,because many Christians dispute rather its biblical or not,but I will add what you commented to my research.Thanks for your time. Best of luck, and may reason, and science be with you.
@KevZen2000 The Christians that dispute the book of Enoch are all 501c3 corporate church members. This means that a church establishment is limited in what to preach & how to interpret the bible. The government grants them this status in exchange of being their agents & not preaching political issues. Instead, the government uses these churches to implement vaccines & other issues that goes against bible principles.
The real church is a body of believers abroad, not a building nor an establishment. Since Satan is in charged of the mainstream corporate church, he would hide his tracks & indoctrinate. Many Christians simply are taught that angels cannot have sex, because Jesus said "they are not given into marriage". Not given into marriage because they were created eternal, we are mortal & need to reproduce.
Not given in marriage also does not mean incapable of having sex. Because of these things, many mainstream Christians do not accept the book of Enoch.
@joeprofits It has to be. Its found quoted in scripture, it re-enforces scripture, & it does not contradict scripture. The only people that think it contradicts scripture, are the very people who don't know the scripture, but rather know what's been taught to them by the 501c3 indoctrinating church who reinterprets scripture..
@david1057 i got one more question ive been reading it now and i can tell it tells the truth the only thing i dont understand is that were those angels of god or fallen angels?? who brought the giants and thanks for your time
@officialchristiantv They were actually good angels that left their estate in exchange to mate with women & bear children. Since they purposely conspired to commit this sin, there's no redemption or forgiveness for them, as oppose to mankind who was deceived into sinning. Do not confuse this batch of angels, with the angels Satan brought with him after his fall.
@TrustinJC Stupidity is what all followers of the Book of Enoch have in common. If it was the infallible word of God, it would at the very least get the dates right along with the genealogies of the time. If you were a student of the Bible, you'd know better than to blather on about the fantastic claims of the spurious kind. Read the Authorised Version and make a good start to your education of the Bible.
If you were a student of God's word, you wouldn't fall victim to the traditions of man. If you knew the importance of having all of god's word, you wouldn't blather about the bible containing all of god's word. And you wouldn't condemn God's holy and inspired word as you do.
@plator99 Only naysayers accuse the word of God of containing contradictions. Learned men who study the Bible know differently. You put up your very best example and I'll knock it down.
Oh? I'll provide an example, 1KI 4:26 And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.2CH 9:25 And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.
@plator99 You're playing google fool to get your questions. Why not google the answers, too? You'd never have noticed this supposed contradiction by yourself. Clowns always bring this up, revealing their lack of comprehension and literacy skills. Having never read the Bible many dishonestly claim they know it well. What they really know is how to google.
(1) 40,000 stalls of horses FOR chariots (2) He also had 4000 stalls for horses AND chariots.
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
Never mind that your reply was just apologetic semantics, obviously joseph must have had multiple fathers because my mistranslated holy book said so lol, do you see? I like how people insert text into their bible to explain its incoherency.
@plator99 Your foolishness shines a path before you. You can't even recognise that these are two distinct genealogies. Now, silly man, see if you have the reading skills of an 8 year old and work out which one is Joseph's genealogy and which one is Mary's. Don't be too quick to bring up the standard rediculous stupid examples given to you by twerps. Think first, God gave you a brain. Use your own and don't be a mouthpiece for the gormless..
I like how you cannot write an argument without resorting to ad hominem, but notice how it does not refer at all to mary's father, only to the father of her husband, but its useless for me to throw pearls before swine no? lol
I also suggest you watch my current favorite on my channel, should make everything clear for you in an exquisite fashion. After all, sanguis bibimus, corpus edimus :D
@joeprofits So you agree, it's the inspired word of God? Shouldn't someone have basic literacy skills before publicly accepting a book as inspired of the Holy Spirit, as the infallible, word of God? Except a man be born again he wont accept forgiveness. Can you see your mistake? How qualified to judge should we be? Your pastor and father, ordained (of men) minister dad, is obviously not qualified, either, to judge what is of God or not, no matter how many titles he believes are his to wear.
Book of Enoch is a LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EKrassner90 7 months ago
@EKrassner90 There are many books of Enoch that are lies; however, there's is an authentic book of Enoch found within the dead sea scrolls along with the book of Isiah in which give credence to the bible.
david1057 7 months ago
@david1057 just read the book of genesis, angles did put on human flesh, just ask Abraham, he feed them and wash their feet aswell, now we know that you can not wash a spirit's feet? and the men of sodom and gomorrah thought they were rugular men. so that's where your wrong.
benjudah71 3 months ago
@benjudah71 Do not confuse the fact that angels can be transformed in order to appear human looking, with actually embodying a human body. Angels are not of human flesh but can appear that way or any way they chose to. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 2 Corinthians 11:14
david1057 3 months ago
@EKrassner90 ty because the book of enoch was not put in the tanakh for a reason
1nemindgypsy 3 months ago
@EKrassner90 God bless you these people are dilluted and will belive anything
1nemindgypsy 3 months ago
David, was that your voice?
princessmarthajandio 1 year ago
The book of Enoch is very important because as you can see in our bibles we dont have the complete books about Enoch,That's why in the book of Enoch it says that it is for a remote generation concerning the elect ones that will be living in the time of tribulation. I think that bad times are coming and tribulations,so we need to get ready and get right with our judge.We need to get ready and think about that day when we get to stand infront of God.
joselinema 1 year ago
@joselinema Nice tomeet others who agree on the importance and validity of Enoch.
TrustinJC 1 year ago
aren't angels spiritual beings? therefore spirits and human dna, it doesn't sound like a match to me...
billenh 1 year ago
@billenh Demons are spirit beings, in which means they are disembodied from their Nephelim flesh. Angels on the other hand, suppose to be spiritual beings as far as not going after the flesh, but walking in the spirit. They do however have a body, not as our body, but nevertheless a body.
There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
(1 Corinthians 15:40 KJV)
david1057 1 year ago
@billenh We are spiritual beings also.
islandmamma 1 year ago
@billenh True that.
whinda4702 1 year ago
It's good to come across someone who believes as strongly as I do about the writings of Enoch being inspired works.
I've made a video series about the writings of Enoch and explain why it must be considered inspired.
Thanks for making this video. It should peek people's interest.
TrustinJC 1 year ago
That person reading the book, has a good voice. I wish he did some science audio books, I would buy them. I could use them in studying evolution, and Quantum Mechanics. David1057, who is that, may I ask. Thanks for your time.
KevZen2000 1 year ago
@KevZen2000 His name is in the clip.
david1057 1 year ago
Should we take the book of Enoch as a biblical foundation, because many scholars deny it is. I am not a Christian, but I find theology interesting. I do not believe in the book of Enoch, as a literal story, but a metaphor such as the Story of the Garden of Eden or the Flood.I see many things in the bible as metaphors such as Satan, Demons, and so on. You are knowledgeable in these areas David1057, so your perspective would help.The bible is around 2000-3000 years old, and as I can see it..
KevZen2000 1 year ago
@KevZen2000 Many scholars deny it because this book was meant to be hidden until our generation. Scholars are not the final authority in God's affair, God is. This book was considered scripture in the Old Testament & was quoted by Peter & Jude in the bible. The phrase Son of man & the elected one stated in the book of Enoch, were references to Jesus & prophecies of his coming Kingdom.
david1057 1 year ago
Thanks. I will look more into it. I have always wondered about the Book of Enoch,because many Christians dispute rather its biblical or not,but I will add what you commented to my research.Thanks for your time. Best of luck, and may reason, and science be with you.
KevZen2000 1 year ago
@KevZen2000 The Christians that dispute the book of Enoch are all 501c3 corporate church members. This means that a church establishment is limited in what to preach & how to interpret the bible. The government grants them this status in exchange of being their agents & not preaching political issues. Instead, the government uses these churches to implement vaccines & other issues that goes against bible principles.
david1057 1 year ago
The real church is a body of believers abroad, not a building nor an establishment. Since Satan is in charged of the mainstream corporate church, he would hide his tracks & indoctrinate. Many Christians simply are taught that angels cannot have sex, because Jesus said "they are not given into marriage". Not given into marriage because they were created eternal, we are mortal & need to reproduce.
david1057 1 year ago
Not given in marriage also does not mean incapable of having sex. Because of these things, many mainstream Christians do not accept the book of Enoch.
david1057 1 year ago
@david1057 Can You Explain To Me What This Book Of Enoch Is And why so many christians refuse it,And Thanks
officialchristiantv 1 year ago
@officialchristiantv I thought I just did when I answered KevZen2000.
david1057 1 year ago
@david1057 oh my bad i didnt read the comments
officialchristiantv 1 year ago
@david1057 i completely agree. the book is clearly inspired of God. my pastor and father (ordained minister) except it as God's word.
joeprofits 1 year ago
@joeprofits It has to be. Its found quoted in scripture, it re-enforces scripture, & it does not contradict scripture. The only people that think it contradicts scripture, are the very people who don't know the scripture, but rather know what's been taught to them by the 501c3 indoctrinating church who reinterprets scripture..
david1057 1 year ago
@david1057 i got one more question ive been reading it now and i can tell it tells the truth the only thing i dont understand is that were those angels of god or fallen angels?? who brought the giants and thanks for your time
officialchristiantv 1 year ago
@officialchristiantv They were actually good angels that left their estate in exchange to mate with women & bear children. Since they purposely conspired to commit this sin, there's no redemption or forgiveness for them, as oppose to mankind who was deceived into sinning. Do not confuse this batch of angels, with the angels Satan brought with him after his fall.
david1057 1 year ago
@joeprofits Don't be fooled, it contradicts itself and the Bible.
SunshineHarvest 1 year ago
@SunshineHarvest No it doesn't. It supports the bible. But more importantly, Jesus and the apostles knew it to be inspired and taught from it.
TrustinJC 1 year ago
@TrustinJC Stupidity is what all followers of the Book of Enoch have in common. If it was the infallible word of God, it would at the very least get the dates right along with the genealogies of the time. If you were a student of the Bible, you'd know better than to blather on about the fantastic claims of the spurious kind. Read the Authorised Version and make a good start to your education of the Bible.
SunshineHarvest 11 months ago
@SunshineHarvest Really? And what dates did Enoch get wrong?
If you were a student of God's word, you wouldn't fall victim to the traditions of man. If you knew the importance of having all of god's word, you wouldn't blather about the bible containing all of god's word. And you wouldn't condemn God's holy and inspired word as you do.
TrustinJC 11 months ago
@SunshineHarvest
thats a terrible argument, since the bible contradicts itself as well
plator99 11 months ago
@plator99 Only naysayers accuse the word of God of containing contradictions. Learned men who study the Bible know differently. You put up your very best example and I'll knock it down.
SunshineHarvest 11 months ago
@SunshineHarvest
Oh? I'll provide an example, 1KI 4:26 And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.2CH 9:25 And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.
plator99 11 months ago
@plator99 You're playing google fool to get your questions. Why not google the answers, too? You'd never have noticed this supposed contradiction by yourself. Clowns always bring this up, revealing their lack of comprehension and literacy skills. Having never read the Bible many dishonestly claim they know it well. What they really know is how to google.
(1) 40,000 stalls of horses FOR chariots (2) He also had 4000 stalls for horses AND chariots.
Obviously there's two types of stalls. D'u c ?
SunshineHarvest 10 months ago
@SunshineHarvest
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
Never mind that your reply was just apologetic semantics, obviously joseph must have had multiple fathers because my mistranslated holy book said so lol, do you see? I like how people insert text into their bible to explain its incoherency.
plator99 10 months ago
@plator99 Your foolishness shines a path before you. You can't even recognise that these are two distinct genealogies. Now, silly man, see if you have the reading skills of an 8 year old and work out which one is Joseph's genealogy and which one is Mary's. Don't be too quick to bring up the standard rediculous stupid examples given to you by twerps. Think first, God gave you a brain. Use your own and don't be a mouthpiece for the gormless..
SunshineHarvest 10 months ago
@SunshineHarvest
I like how you cannot write an argument without resorting to ad hominem, but notice how it does not refer at all to mary's father, only to the father of her husband, but its useless for me to throw pearls before swine no? lol
plator99 10 months ago
Comment removed
plator99 10 months ago
@SunshineHarvest
I also suggest you watch my current favorite on my channel, should make everything clear for you in an exquisite fashion. After all, sanguis bibimus, corpus edimus :D
plator99 10 months ago
@SunshineHarvest
EXO 15:3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is his name.
ROM 15:33 Now the God of peace be with you all. Amen.
So err, which is it?
plator99 11 months ago
@joeprofits So you agree, it's the inspired word of God? Shouldn't someone have basic literacy skills before publicly accepting a book as inspired of the Holy Spirit, as the infallible, word of God? Except a man be born again he wont accept forgiveness. Can you see your mistake? How qualified to judge should we be? Your pastor and father, ordained (of men) minister dad, is obviously not qualified, either, to judge what is of God or not, no matter how many titles he believes are his to wear.
SunshineHarvest 10 months ago
5 stars
First comment :-)
fighterpilot2k1 1 year ago