No, this Sherman looks like it is one of the Israeli models upgraded to a French CN-75-50 75mm. Those guns were a modified design of the Panther's own KwK 42 75mm.
Now if you would like to argue SEMANTICS, you could refer to the M51 Super Sherman, as that model used the T23 turret for use with the FRENCH 105 mm CN 105 F1.
This model could, if using an M4A3 hull, LOOK like an Easy Eight.
The Israeli military, which built/converted the M50 and M51 Super Shermans, used all sherman hulls that were available (seeing as they were no longer in production).
This includes, but is not limited to, M4's, M4A1's, M4A2's, M4A3's, M4A4(5)'s.
1: It has the M4A4(+) style Glacis, which sported additional armor in front of the crew hatches. This hull was NEVER used by US forces.
2: It has the original M4 turret, which was rarely used with the 76mm due to weight, balance issues, even with a counterweight. This is why almost all 76mm-armed Sherman models used the T23 turret.
3: The gun mantlet is NOTHING like that of a 76mm on either the M4 turret or the T23 turret.
i think its the sherman that was up gunned by the british to a 90mm 17 pound gun, wqas basically a sawn of version of the british 17 pounder anti tank gun. used alot towards the end of ww2. 1944-45
@formatR he mustnt have been there to know that... as far as i know the Sherman M-50 was build AFTER ww2...so it doesnt matter if he were there or not... if it wasnt build at that time itCOULDNT have been there ;)
Incorrect. No U.S. model sherman used a turret with a counter balance or mantlet shaped like that.
No American late production tanks had the welded on plates, either. All 76.2-mm armed vehicles had reshaped hulls.
This is clearly an Israeli conversion of a mid-production vehicle equipping it with the HVSS found on a fraction of late model tanks, a modified turret, and a new weapon system.
Ahhh yes the awesome WWII Sherman TAnk...First time I seen one was at the Spruce Goose dome in OC...I loved it...I got a chance to drive a retired Sherman tank 3 weeks ago... What a RUSH...driving them is pretty cool...well it wasn't cool for the fence that I hit LOL
a 34 ton Sherman. I see what you mean. I don't know why idiots left me 2 poor comments, they probably couldn't tell between a Sherman and a Tiger. But you seem to know what you're talking about.
thats because if a single tiger breaks down, it takes 2 tigers to pull it into a facotry to be patched up. It take 5 bulldozers to pull one tiger. that how heavy they are. thats why the only made around 2000 of them tigers, and around 500 had the power to sumebrge under 12 feet of water.
This was as good a Sherman could get... late prod version, 76mm gun, long barrel, Horizintal Volute Spring Suspension... I cannot understand why the US Armed Forces did not pay attention for Christie´s revolutionary suspension, that was used by the Russian tanks even before the war and in the design of teh best WWII tank: the T-34... But I love the M4, anyway... You had to have balls to face a Panther o Tiger in one of this sardine cans...
Sherman was good against japanese tanks on the Pcific, but in Europe, Tigers and King Tigers were much tougher. Americans needed to sacriface 3 Shermans to destroy one Tiger. Pershing tank was powerful enough to destroy Tiger, but there was only few of them in Europe in 1945.
when Sherman against tiger, best way for it to destroy tiger is to call P-47 to bomb it. Sherman 76mm cannon can't even penetrate front aromor of tiger at any range
That's why they usually sacrificed 2 shermans to get one Tiger. 3 tanks total, two would have to get shot while the third sneeks around and blows the tigers ass out.
Safest Spot.....THE TANK!
DEVOXxCANADAxX 2 months ago
there's just something about seeing a such a big tank obliterate such a small car that makes me feel soooo goooood!!
RenardWarrior 5 months ago
this seems an experiment. this is not real time.
Purgination 6 months ago
Sweet car =)
cyberdems 8 months ago
Notice how it's running over a German car (VW) and a Japanese car (Honda)?
Who thinks this a coincidence?
mpaul1974 9 months ago 9
this seems an experiment. this is not real time.
tripathimanubhai 9 months ago
this seems an experiment. this is not real time.
tripathimanubhai 9 months ago
this Sherman Tank is a toy for the German World War 2 Tanks
caucau2323 10 months ago
@caucau2323
No, this Sherman looks like it is one of the Israeli models upgraded to a French CN-75-50 75mm. Those guns were a modified design of the Panther's own KwK 42 75mm.
SPARTANG294 1 month ago
wheres my car? i just park it here... wtf!! thats my car!!! somebody is gonna pay for this!!
AdeptusAntares 10 months ago
in soviet russia car crushes tank
mrcarbine541 10 months ago
@mrcarbine541 lol are you serious :)
hienzee 10 months ago
Yes.....BUT WILL IT STAND UP TO A TIGER!
PzGSephy 10 months ago
Nice M4A3E8 Shermans guise! :3
gmodfan2000 10 months ago
Only in america.
loolmeanslolxD 11 months ago
@loolmeanslolxD Nah, they do stuff like this in the U.K. too.
Suzuki1776 10 months ago
This is some hillbilly shit! Let's take the family see tanks crush cars...yeehaaa!
resistenciaa 11 months ago
@resistenciaa just what the hell isn't cool about tanks crushing cars? To watch a piece of history destroy stuff even now
owtraged 10 months ago
dear santa...
Trickydude123 11 months ago 2
looks like a sherman..
shocktrauma13 1 year ago
Now if you would like to argue SEMANTICS, you could refer to the M51 Super Sherman, as that model used the T23 turret for use with the FRENCH 105 mm CN 105 F1.
This model could, if using an M4A3 hull, LOOK like an Easy Eight.
The Israeli military, which built/converted the M50 and M51 Super Shermans, used all sherman hulls that were available (seeing as they were no longer in production).
This includes, but is not limited to, M4's, M4A1's, M4A2's, M4A3's, M4A4(5)'s.
MJesDK 1 year ago
And secondly, What?
1: The '17 Pounder' was designed by Britain in 1941, predicting that their QF-6 would not suffice V german armor.
The M1(A1(C)) was designed by the USA. It is not based on the 17 Pounder, but on the 3" M7, which itself is a modernized 3" Gun M1918 fielded in 1918
It is VASTLY inferior to the 17 Pounder.
2: The first M-50 Super Shermans used the FRENCH 75mm CN 75-50, which was based off the GERMAN 75mm KwK42 L/70, which was used on the Panther Tank.
MJesDK 1 year ago
@nohairguysrevenge
No. Not even.
This is an M50 Super Sherman. Why?
1: It has the M4A4(+) style Glacis, which sported additional armor in front of the crew hatches. This hull was NEVER used by US forces.
2: It has the original M4 turret, which was rarely used with the 76mm due to weight, balance issues, even with a counterweight. This is why almost all 76mm-armed Sherman models used the T23 turret.
3: The gun mantlet is NOTHING like that of a 76mm on either the M4 turret or the T23 turret.
MJesDK 1 year ago
its not an m50 this is an M4A3E8 sherman (Easy Eight)
high velocity 76mm gun more advanced version of the M4 Firefly 17 pounder
the M4A3E8 was later dubbed the m50 by other countries who used it but the m50 never served in US colors
great tank but i think the old type turret looked better :P
nohairguysrevenge 1 year ago
lol yanks got glorious british variant.
THEM1GHTYPHUZ 1 year ago
there should drive german Maus tank or king tiger for this :P
leksss4 1 year ago
if thats what it does when it hits you i would hate to see it shoot
Gorgontech 1 year ago
Next time, try using a car to crush two tanks.
CaramelBreakfast 1 year ago
German and Japanese cars i noticed that are being crushed. What was wrong with that VW convertible?
mammillaria69 1 year ago
i think its the sherman that was up gunned by the british to a 90mm 17 pound gun, wqas basically a sawn of version of the british 17 pounder anti tank gun. used alot towards the end of ww2. 1944-45
dappadan22 1 year ago
@dappadan22
you're wrong, it is an 1967 Isreali M50 Super Sherman
pershing22 1 year ago
tigre3 vv sherman
Alzazyel 1 year ago
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i got a scrach on my car!!!
TheDemonWithinStudio 1 year ago
haha a sherman love those
prozombiehunter 1 year ago
@prozombiehunter but to weak for the German Tiger Tank.=)
KleinerJ09 1 year ago
usa = low iQ
Yamol87 1 year ago 7
@Yamol87 I dont see how this would possibly indicate a low IQ especially for that of such a large and diverse country as the US.
bloodyschnoz 1 month ago
Sherman M-50 was never used in WWII
Woodenlegjoe 1 year ago
@Woodenlegjoe So youve been there?
formatR 1 year ago
@formatR he mustnt have been there to know that... as far as i know the Sherman M-50 was build AFTER ww2...so it doesnt matter if he were there or not... if it wasnt build at that time itCOULDNT have been there ;)
Aracnah 1 year ago
At first sight, I thought that was M10 Tank Destroyer because of the shape of the turret. Glad vafan13 said this is M50 Super Sherman.
MingmingHill400 1 year ago
it's just, soo beautiful :' )
tyuru2 1 year ago
what kind of cars were these
canadiancatgreen 1 year ago
Sherman's Rock the Casbsh!
Aracatamus 1 year ago
well they used the M-50 super sherman in WW2 so its sherman tank
humvee600 1 year ago
whata heck is this?? call of duty, online??
Linicer 1 year ago
Is that an M51 Sherman?
ferrari967csl 2 years ago
if you don't like your car call him
bigusmcWW2 2 years ago
Even i know its a sherman and i know crap about tanks
Conorsev 2 years ago
Someone shoot that sirene!! :-(
BigAndTall666 2 years ago
Shhot 'em with holes and fille 'em with lead!
FWW7450 2 years ago
what were the cars that were crushed?
canadiancatgreen 2 years ago
dude wheres my car?
kosovanwhizkid 2 years ago
what kind of car was your car?
canadiancatgreen 2 years ago
Israeli Super Sherman
GenericAmerican1 2 years ago
Not an M10 !
bumdrips 2 years ago
So it's a Sherman then ?
bumdrips 2 years ago
no it's a m10 wolverine i think but i'm not sure
ab1cdefghijklmnop 2 years ago
no, its an m4 sherman, u can tell by its sloped armor
avenger1002 2 years ago
Google it.. says it's still a Sherman.. M50/51.. Developement of the HVSS M4 A4 chassis (super sherman)
The one in the vid has a white star on it though !
bumdrips 2 years ago
M4 A3 E8, It's a Sherman, but a late model !
bumdrips 2 years ago
It's not a wartime American model. It's an M50 or M51 Israeli vehicle.
revolrz22 2 years ago
Nope. Late model U.S. Not Israeli.
iowa61 2 years ago
Incorrect. No U.S. model sherman used a turret with a counter balance or mantlet shaped like that.
No American late production tanks had the welded on plates, either. All 76.2-mm armed vehicles had reshaped hulls.
This is clearly an Israeli conversion of a mid-production vehicle equipping it with the HVSS found on a fraction of late model tanks, a modified turret, and a new weapon system.
revolrz22 2 years ago
I stand corrected.
iowa61 2 years ago
LOVE the effect of the near-shot of the car at the end; nice touch!
uploadJ 3 years ago
they used a lot of those in wwii, they are halftracks
THANK YOU SHERLOCK HOLMES
DavidOrtiz246 3 years ago
what kind of cars were they?
smartestinUSA 3 years ago
sweet, Utah! :)
ngmatt21 3 years ago
.... LOOK HONEY, now it's a convertible!
pershing22 3 years ago 28
the car was demolihed it is not a covertable look up the definition in a dictionary
smartestinUSA 3 years ago
@pershing22 LOL!
123Blackkitty 1 year ago
my page is done!
bryand1791 3 years ago
is that a Sherman firefly?
1976MUSTANG 3 years ago
it is a tank
it is a tank
smartestinUSA 3 years ago
Yep, that is definitely an M-50 "Super Sherman," not a WW2 Sherman
vafan13 3 years ago 27
Good call; you know your tanks. Wish I had a Super Sherman...
czj617 3 years ago
@vafan13 isnt it a sherman firefly?
DRAGONIRONFIST 1 year ago
@vafan13 I swear it looks more like a Pershing, though I could be wrong.
Aragorn106654 6 months ago
@Aragorn106654 Pershing looks nothing like that xD
Mrfunnydead 5 months ago
@Mrfunnydead Fair point; my knowledge of American tanks isnt as great as it once was. Thanks :)
Aragorn106654 5 months ago
@vafan13
nerd
Hubieee 4 months ago in playlist CRUSH.P2
oh and as you know now sherman had now easy 8 suspension so ya
snowpro2001 3 years ago
Ahhh yes the awesome WWII Sherman TAnk...First time I seen one was at the Spruce Goose dome in OC...I loved it...I got a chance to drive a retired Sherman tank 3 weeks ago... What a RUSH...driving them is pretty cool...well it wasn't cool for the fence that I hit LOL
scott93257 3 years ago 2
Sherman tanks FTW!
ZorakUnlimited2 3 years ago
Didn't the sherman have a pair of petrol engines?
EnigmaNZ1 3 years ago
sherman tanks are like the best. lol =D
patchbowen 3 years ago
shermans the real american tank!!
technoman43 3 years ago
it sounds like a lawn mower or go-kart :D
jrdn7730 4 years ago
What the Sherman's 3 rounds to crush a car can do, a Tiger can do it in just 1.
TyrantTG002 4 years ago
Tigers are also heavier, makes a big difference.
Painkiller1170 4 years ago
Yeah, I know. 56 tons of Krupp machinery against
a 34 ton Sherman. I see what you mean. I don't know why idiots left me 2 poor comments, they probably couldn't tell between a Sherman and a Tiger. But you seem to know what you're talking about.
TyrantTG002 4 years ago
WW2 is a pretty intersting war to me.
Painkiller1170 4 years ago
I find it fascinating! Well, the technology actually.
TyrantTG002 4 years ago
thats because if a single tiger breaks down, it takes 2 tigers to pull it into a facotry to be patched up. It take 5 bulldozers to pull one tiger. that how heavy they are. thats why the only made around 2000 of them tigers, and around 500 had the power to sumebrge under 12 feet of water.
lovelegodude 4 years ago
I know. 56 tons of steel. Its a heavy tank.
TyrantTG002 4 years ago
you know that if you snuck up real close to a tige, and slowly crouch-waled next to it, the crew woudln't notice you at all, because its that big
lovelegodude 4 years ago
Yeah, I kinda figured that. Do you think Tigers should have been used in urban warfare? Or open Warfare? What do you think?
TyrantTG002 4 years ago
i dont know... i like the t34 better... theres one in the musuem in zhitomere in ukraine, and its loooks sweet
lovelegodude 4 years ago
Hmmm. I should check that out.
TyrantTG002 4 years ago
@ tyrantg002, you are kidding I think ?????
Dosn't matter what kind of tank, using them in citys is a bad idea
Poor view from inside any tank !
trippel321chaos 3 years ago
Dude! Calm down! I was only asking someone else's opinion. Don't get your nipples in a knot!
TyrantTG002 3 years ago
caterpillar track+rubber wheel
EugeneXL 4 years ago
awesome!
RussMaGuss 4 years ago
This was as good a Sherman could get... late prod version, 76mm gun, long barrel, Horizintal Volute Spring Suspension... I cannot understand why the US Armed Forces did not pay attention for Christie´s revolutionary suspension, that was used by the Russian tanks even before the war and in the design of teh best WWII tank: the T-34... But I love the M4, anyway... You had to have balls to face a Panther o Tiger in one of this sardine cans...
capitaomiller 4 years ago
Sherman was good against japanese tanks on the Pcific, but in Europe, Tigers and King Tigers were much tougher. Americans needed to sacriface 3 Shermans to destroy one Tiger. Pershing tank was powerful enough to destroy Tiger, but there was only few of them in Europe in 1945.
HaganDave 4 years ago
Sherman cannon is small to againt Japanese small light tanks.
cuttingwoodnow 4 years ago
when Sherman against tiger, best way for it to destroy tiger is to call P-47 to bomb it. Sherman 76mm cannon can't even penetrate front aromor of tiger at any range
fanrock51 4 years ago
front armor****
fanrock51 4 years ago
It's that and/or the sherman should find a way around to get behind the tiger's weak point , the butt. lol.
kunatracing 4 years ago
That's why they usually sacrificed 2 shermans to get one Tiger. 3 tanks total, two would have to get shot while the third sneeks around and blows the tigers ass out.
Painkiller1170 4 years ago
Oh an HVSS variant, cool!
Stuka87 4 years ago