There is a magnificent recording (DVD) of Diane Bish (of "Joy of Music" fame) and SIMON PRESTON (of Westminster Abbey fame) playing this piece as a DUET (TWO organs) and it's totally brilliant. Somewhere in Florida I think.
Excusez-moi de redemander qui est l'organiste qui joue dans cet extrait ? Je ne parle pas anglais suffisamment pour vous poser la question dans cette langue...
I believe the church itself dictates the pace you can play this piece. The reason it is played (properly) so slowly at N.D. is that the resonance time of the space would make a flashy fast pace all muddy.
@allezach Yes, the church does play an important part in deciding the tempo. However, in smaller churches, it is still aesthetically pleasing to play at a tempo where most of the notes can be heard blending together. I agree that ND is a place where a quick tempo would render this piece muddy because of the size, but I have played this piece in a smaller church in a slower tempo with excellent results.
whats so special about notre dame organ is the power of the reeds and the solo of the pedals. But I did I did not hear the 32' register til the last chord of the clip.
With all that sound and the reverb of that old building mistakes can go unnoticed... Nice to hear that piece on the machine I believe it was intended for.
I might say that it was Olivier Latry. But this is a little slower than the tempo in which he plays the Toccata. So that leaves two options. And I don't know the Names of the other two Titulairs.
I do agree. Modern ( rock & techno ) music has caused most of our contemporaries to think that music should always be played at least vivace. This is Lento Maestoso, which is perfect
a) for this piece of music
b) this particular organ
c) this incredible, hallowed place that is Notre Dame
To all low-tempo-haters: I think this is a really good tempo. I am also playing it like that! In that way you can hear EVERY single note. Not just a mess of notes somewhere! Good performance!!!!!! I hate people that are playing it that horrible fast. It doesnt mean that you are a professional if you can play it faster!!!!
@friedrichsacher Indeed, couldn't say more, there are so many versions of this on youtube and they're all filled with a ridiculous rushed tempo, makes us feel like 'ok what he's doing? randomnly touching the keys?' because there is no melody, it's just exactly what you said, just a mess of notes.
I've sat in the organ loft with Olivier Latry playing during a Vespers service, and trust me, this tempo is not too slow considering the acoustical environment!
Yes, indeed he plays slowly in comparison to every other versions we can hear on youtube. But, actually when Widor composed this magnificient piece, the tempo was slower and designed to give a majestic effect. It's only years after that he made some corrections, bringing the tempo at his actual level.
The tempo was at first faster (118) and he later changed it to 100. I think both are valid depending on the player and the organ. Checkout Ben van Oosten on YT for a superb 100 version. This one here is way under 100 - I would say 80sumthing - and that IS slow. Nevertheless the piece is so great that every tempo reveals things I had never heard before. I find it fascinating.
I will say that it is rather slow...however the Notre dame is such a large building that if the organist wants the audience to hear every note he needs to slow it down otherwise there would be soooo much echo in that building its crazy
Actually the organist played this work at the right tempo esp. for a reverberant space like Notre Dame. As complex as Widor's toccata is and considering the reverberation of the space, if the music were played too fast it would lose detail and result in a muddy sound. In spaces with dryer acoustics this piece would sound right played played at a faster tempo.
I love how the pedal comes out so well with the keyboard floating on top. It really gets the stately majesty of the piece across. The last chords just slide together with those pauses, it's really well done.
Forse è così che Widor intendeva la sua Toccata (diciamo la più conosciuta, poiché ne ha composte 2..). Francamente non capisco quelli che si ostinano a suonarla veloce, per esempio Diane Bish. Per cogliere le armonie di questa toccata è meglio che la si suoni così. Anche perché evidentemente l'acustica di Notre Dame ha un riverbero che dura più di cinque secondi, mi pare. Pure l'interpretazione di Ben Van Oosten è ottima a mio parere, al di sopra di tutte le altre, insuperabile.
I like the speed of it here doesn't get all mushed up like most do. I think of the pedal line as the melody anyhow. It's harder to play it slower than rush through it.
Thanks - this proves that the breakneck speed at which some people play the Toccata does not do it justice. CMW could not have played it fast at St Sulpice on the old tubular pneumatics!
You know, this doesn't sound like Latry to me. It has a lot more feeling than his performances usually do, and even though all the French titular organists seem to understand the temp concept this seems even slower, which is very nice with the resonance of the cathdral (and maybe I'm wrong, but it almost sounds like the registry choices are different, because Latry's recording sounds much less dark and full.)
You know - looking at the original Leduc edition, the 'double thump' is marked by such tiny appogiaturas that the whole thing could, by some, be taken as optional. And Widor himself, in his famous recording, smudged the affair by going half-and-half. Take a listen!
AllenOrgan - sorry to take so long getting back to you. Widor's recording of the Toccata (and bits from the 'Gothique' symphonie, are regularly re-released by EMI. My own copy is from a French HMV LP set (Orgues & Organistes Francais en 1930), which also includes Tournemire, Vierne, Gigout, Dupre, and Bonnet actually playing. Stunning stuff. (C153-16411/5, released 1981). I have seen a CD containing not just the Widor, but Vierne, Dupre, and Messiaen also...take a look on the web...
If that was a mobile phone, the audio is amazing. The organist is labouring a little; no doubt enjoying the resonance and registration, but makes the classic mistake of not applying the double chord at the end, and to my way of thinking, not holding the single high top 'F' note for long enough. Just my 2p from the UK.
i totally agree with you people ! Only it is actually slower than the "original version". I went to a concert at Notre Dame and being french i just love it ! They made it slower tio increase the "resonnance" in the cathedral !!
To jutescrim. I know the score has a "double pump" at the end but truthfully I, for one, prefer it played the way we hear it in this presentation. I have a CD from Norte Dame with Olivier Latry playing Widor Toccata and there is no double pump at the end of that recording either. Technically, I suppose, it should be played as written, but giving the performer some latitude, provides a much bolder finish without the double pump.
There is a ''double pump'' at the end only its done very fast about a 0.50 second delay just listen very carefully, Its most likely Olivier Latry playing this as it is the same on his recording but I think that the double pump is the best ending.
I assume this is the version played by Daniel Roth, the most powerful of all renditions, but perhaps a trifle stately. I would be grateful if someone would record the whole of this version on You Tube.
One criticism - no double thump on the last chord, clearly shown on the music score
For me the ultimte rendition of this piece of music was recorded and played by the celebrated French organist Daniel Roth on tne Organ of St. Sulpice, Paris - the sheer power and pace is trully magnificent and unsurpassed
I believe it was recorded on the CD - Widor: Complete Symphonies, Vol.5 on the Motette label. If anyone is intereested in hearing this please download to You Tube or advise me how I can
You know, I wish the Widor Toccata was played rather less: it's a fine piece that's become rather hackneyed. Also, notwithstanding recent alterations, the Notre Dame organ is still fabulous. Any chance of bringing us any recordings from Bath Abbey? Again, they could be linked to on Wikipedia...
I'm sure when there's next an organ recital from Bath Abbey, I'll record something from it - but there hasn't been one for some months, and I don't know when the next one is.
@EccentricRichard We heard this opus recently at St Sulpice whilst visiting the church, I will never forget the experience and I have been around a v long time.
The full version was played on BBC Radio 3 @a year ago. My poor Hacker radio was having a job coping with the volume of this magnificent instrument. Please would someone give details as to where we can obtain the cd or put the complete play on Youtube
This is fantastic, the best I have ever heard it played! What a pity it could not have been recorded in its entirety. Does anyone know where I could get a recording of this piece played on the organ of Notre Dame?
Ziggy, You can find a recording of the piece on the instrument for and on which it was composed, St-Sulpice in Paris, on Daniel Roth's CD with the complete Widor 5th and Widor 10th "Romane" Symphonies. It's on the Motette label but could be out of print.
Latry recorded the 5 & 6 symphonie at the lable bnl but it's rather hard to find (I think they have it in the ohscatalog. And Latry is defenitly a better Widor-interpret then Roth (well,simply a better organist all together...)
In respose to the Midmer-Losh in Atlantic city, it wasn't quite the exact tocatta. It was good, and the pedal well defined. And also, with the older tocatta with flutes, that organ is so intensely loud that you can kill ears with it. I like this tempo though. Virgil Fox was much too fast. Good, but fast.
it was the widor toccata, but it is a poor quality recording with 8 seconds reverb, it doesnt make it clear. It does sound wonderfull though, it will be amazing to hear it all working again. Its restoration has started.
Are they planning to re-restore the Great Chamber? I have the "Senator's Masterpiece" video and would love to get a more in depth view of the stops. I heard in the bonus videos Jon Ledwon using the Grand Ophicleide. Like a boat horn.
give the organist a break--this in no way replicates hearing the organ concerts at ND--you're listening on your PC. Hearing the organ concerts at ND almost made me give up my sinful ways.
The organist here is Mr Benjamin Righetti, of the Church of La Tour-de-Peilz in Switzerland. It was recorded at the weekly 4.30pm Sunday recital on 4th February 2007.
Hello. My phone is a Samsung SGH 900, which I bought over a year ago! I agree the sound quality is very good, though I'm sure phones with even better sound quality are available now.
I didn't say it wasn't good. There is just a very small irregularity in the right hand(and I mean very Small) wich is normal(it's the same when I play it) but that is one of the greatest strenghts of Latry that his ritme is solid as a rock. As for the error,that's something so small not worth mentioning.
I think you are just an avid Latry fan, which there is nothing wrong with that. But for you to say this playing is not good is actually quite ignorant. As an Organist/Choirmaster and College Professor of Organ I can tell you this is very good playing. Also, what mistake is it you all are speaking of? The only possible "mistake" I hear is a near side-swipe. Other than that, I hear no mistakes at all.
When your arms ache after 15 seconds playing this you have a problem with your technic. Defenitly not Latry playing here, it's not good enough for his standards
You're right about the error, but you can't really expect them to get it right every time, i'm an organist myself and playing this piece makes your arms ache after 15 seconds worth.
Who played this? Olivier Latry, Jean-Pierre Leguay or Phillippe Lefebvre? I have met Mr. Lefebvre on 2 occasions at the console of the Organ of Notre-Dame. It was deafening and unforgettable.
I can't imagine either Latry or Lefèbvre playing in such a "stately" manner; it just doesn't fit their personalities. So my guess would be Leguay (unless, of course, it was another organist altogether, invited for the weekly recital).
Exactly Desi! Having played at Notre Dame quite a few times myself, I can safely say this is a perfect tempo of this work. Desi has heard my playing of this work where I take it break neck speed a la V.F., but it also depends on the room. In France/Europe you take advantage of the rollin' acoustic!
This tempo is PERFECT. Some European organists always mention how American Organists like to take things so fast and unrelaxed. You can hear every note in the piece. And also...the room has about 6 seconds reverberation when packed.
I have heard a littke bit of it on the acch organ. Idon'e think it is that great because it is not supposed to be played with the diapason chorus consisting of what 13 or 14 diapason and a light mixture you have to have french solo reeds and mixtures with plenum and NO FLUTES. WHICH, WHO EVER PLAYED IT HAD FLUTES ON.
The thing is, the recording of it on the acchos website isnt great quality. When John Ledwon plays it in the DVD it sounds amazing, its such a shame it didnt all work in the DVD, even worse now.
Every organist can, and should, play music and they personally interpret it. Otherwise they would all sound exactly same, Right? There really is not "Supposed To" and different organs have different groups of stops, not all of which are satisfactory. There are no fixed rules, and there should not be.
The organ at Liverpool Anglican Cathedral is definitely better than that of Notre Dame. The organ at Notre Dame is great, but has a tendency to shriek when certain stop combinations are used, whereas at liverpool, each combination produces a musical sound.
As for the error, I may be mistaken, but it's just before the last few chords at 2:00; a note or two seems a bit mangled there. Rather pernickety, I know...
exact, actually between 2:01 ans 2:02 when it becomes the "solo" arpeges when doing do-si-do (C-B-C) the first do slides a bit on ré (D). Rotunda57 is also right, the last chord is not doubled as written on part, but only pressed once (after all, organist does as he likes, personnaly I prefer to stick to what's written as musch as possible). Or it can be due to acoustic effect and/or microphone of your phone ;) (but rest is well recorded)
sound quality is terrible and it's played too slow
H30ea 1 month ago
There is a magnificent recording (DVD) of Diane Bish (of "Joy of Music" fame) and SIMON PRESTON (of Westminster Abbey fame) playing this piece as a DUET (TWO organs) and it's totally brilliant. Somewhere in Florida I think.
Mrphilharmonic 1 month ago
How many of you know that Charles Marie Widor (the composer of this piece) was actually the organist of Notre Dame? AND he was BLIND!!!
Mrphilharmonic 1 month ago
C'est Olivier Latry organiste titulaire a Notre-Dame de Paris je crois.
milesginn 5 months ago
Did you record this with a toaster? Video quality sucks but sound quality is actually good
crustylion321 7 months ago
Excusez-moi de redemander qui est l'organiste qui joue dans cet extrait ? Je ne parle pas anglais suffisamment pour vous poser la question dans cette langue...
marianne0411 8 months ago
but no double thump at thw end!
jutescrim 8 months ago
Who is this organist ?
marianne0411 9 months ago
@marianne0411 GOD
jutescrim 8 months ago
OH NO! so greatly performed and a mistake at the end, that's a shame
railfanatic844 9 months ago
Tempo, instrument, crystal clear execution.
Splendid.
Thank you for sharing this with us.
Sergio
Italy
SergioBonf 1 year ago
The most important stop on any organ is the building !!
Warringtonian58 1 year ago
I believe the church itself dictates the pace you can play this piece. The reason it is played (properly) so slowly at N.D. is that the resonance time of the space would make a flashy fast pace all muddy.
allezach 1 year ago
@allezach Yes, the church does play an important part in deciding the tempo. However, in smaller churches, it is still aesthetically pleasing to play at a tempo where most of the notes can be heard blending together. I agree that ND is a place where a quick tempo would render this piece muddy because of the size, but I have played this piece in a smaller church in a slower tempo with excellent results.
Theliturgist 7 months ago
Please someone download this rendition.....it has to be the greatest. I know, I've been there
jutescrim 1 year ago
Wait, so how do you come to play such an organ? I doubt this is one of the organists at Notre dame.... can you just go and play it?
squiresuzuki 1 year ago
@squiresuzuki i doubt so. i heard that the church aint very open about people giving recitals on the organ. its more reserved for church events.
yokurt 1 year ago
D'OH!!!! To get through this warhorse of a piece and make a mistake at the FRICKIN' END.....!!!!!!
jazzkeyboardman 1 year ago
This is shear power, but nothing else
jutescrim 1 year ago
We have a 1911 Wicks opus 56 in our Church St. Rose of Lima Quincy, Illinois
we restored this fine electro-pneumatic, with the original blower 1898 and its hand pump too.
Geersification 1 year ago
@Geersification I would love to see it...
My next trip to USA...
SergioBonf 1 year ago
I'm stunned. Awesome work.
stargroove4 1 year ago
whats so special about notre dame organ is the power of the reeds and the solo of the pedals. But I did I did not hear the 32' register til the last chord of the clip.
juaniluco888 1 year ago
With all that sound and the reverb of that old building mistakes can go unnoticed... Nice to hear that piece on the machine I believe it was intended for.
yttreblemaker 1 year ago
I heard the mistake, but it didn't really sound horrible at all in my opinion.
MrsAlexisClyde 1 year ago
Comment removed
ziggyshedevil 1 year ago
I might say that it was Olivier Latry. But this is a little slower than the tempo in which he plays the Toccata. So that leaves two options. And I don't know the Names of the other two Titulairs.
MrsAlexisClyde 1 year ago
I heard the mistake. It was a 7th chord instead of a major
2010thevoice 1 year ago
Absolutely wonderful
fiziks2447 1 year ago
at the right end,
x: deeeeeeeeeeeeeh
o: dech, deeeeeeeeh
septemfuku 1 year ago
I cant hear anything of the mistake.
lionelmercier 1 year ago
i heard this play by mr shin on the organ off the melbourne townhall in australia 9200 pipes an louder than this fantastic organ
lewi39 2 years ago
Love the tempo! Not so rushed as many organists tend to play it!
emilewyn 2 years ago 17
terrible sound quality
danenhod 2 years ago
What do you expect, he said he recorded it on his mobile phone... amazing quality if you take that into consideration
flash2368 1 year ago 3
I do agree. Modern ( rock & techno ) music has caused most of our contemporaries to think that music should always be played at least vivace. This is Lento Maestoso, which is perfect
a) for this piece of music
b) this particular organ
c) this incredible, hallowed place that is Notre Dame
In short: grandissima performanza !!
magnaliberatio 2 years ago
To all low-tempo-haters: I think this is a really good tempo. I am also playing it like that! In that way you can hear EVERY single note. Not just a mess of notes somewhere! Good performance!!!!!! I hate people that are playing it that horrible fast. It doesnt mean that you are a professional if you can play it faster!!!!
friedrichsacher 2 years ago
@friedrichsacher Indeed, couldn't say more, there are so many versions of this on youtube and they're all filled with a ridiculous rushed tempo, makes us feel like 'ok what he's doing? randomnly touching the keys?' because there is no melody, it's just exactly what you said, just a mess of notes.
starbreez3 1 year ago
I've sat in the organ loft with Olivier Latry playing during a Vespers service, and trust me, this tempo is not too slow considering the acoustical environment!
chris21hope 2 years ago
that organ is wicked, love it :)
LINKthePIRATE913 2 years ago
@LINKthePIRATE913 ... the wicked shall go down to Hell ...
3NUNS 2 years ago
Yes, indeed he plays slowly in comparison to every other versions we can hear on youtube. But, actually when Widor composed this magnificient piece, the tempo was slower and designed to give a majestic effect. It's only years after that he made some corrections, bringing the tempo at his actual level.
Nikorgan 2 years ago 2
The tempo was at first faster (118) and he later changed it to 100. I think both are valid depending on the player and the organ. Checkout Ben van Oosten on YT for a superb 100 version. This one here is way under 100 - I would say 80sumthing - and that IS slow. Nevertheless the piece is so great that every tempo reveals things I had never heard before. I find it fascinating.
iskenderuna 2 years ago 2
yes you are right! everybody plays it to slow it goes at quiet a lick!
howden123456 2 years ago
I am almost in shock. The tempo of this magnificent piece of music is too slow.
Never heard it that slow.
biografmand 2 years ago
I will say that it is rather slow...however the Notre dame is such a large building that if the organist wants the audience to hear every note he needs to slow it down otherwise there would be soooo much echo in that building its crazy
coloradosparkyred2 2 years ago 2
Actually the organist played this work at the right tempo esp. for a reverberant space like Notre Dame. As complex as Widor's toccata is and considering the reverberation of the space, if the music were played too fast it would lose detail and result in a muddy sound. In spaces with dryer acoustics this piece would sound right played played at a faster tempo.
tamiasthechipmunk 2 years ago 2
when you stay in that church , hearing that BOOOOMBASTIC sound in real , perhaps youll think different about the tempo ;) , just my experience
Menrathorgan 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
biografmand 2 years ago
"funeral march" - I suggest you look at the music and see Widor's tempo indication before you show you're a complete moron by making stupid remarks.
Contratrombone64 2 years ago
Any particular reason this is being played at the speed of a funeral march!?
zerocurve 2 years ago
Pity he didn't think to use the 32' reed for the recapitulation with the pedal. Or at least, I sure can't hear it.
stmickeycl 2 years ago
Disagree. I've never really been a fan of 32' stops. Anything beyond a 16' seems unneccesary to me.
OPHYCLIDE 2 years ago
??? AGHHHHHHHHHHH!!
Ophicleide4 2 years ago
Think what you like, but being on stage with the organ 32's right behind you is an amazing experience.
cornophile91 2 years ago
Thanks for posting - very impressive for a phone recording too.
akarpowicz 2 years ago
What kind of cell do you have? very impressive
Bartokfriend 2 years ago
A grand sound and an inspired piece of musical splendor! The instrument sings in this unforgettable acoustic ambiance.
FromHolbergsTime 2 years ago
I love how the pedal comes out so well with the keyboard floating on top. It really gets the stately majesty of the piece across. The last chords just slide together with those pauses, it's really well done.
cornophile91 2 years ago 4
Far beyond beautiful!
Ropieroo 2 years ago
Forse è così che Widor intendeva la sua Toccata (diciamo la più conosciuta, poiché ne ha composte 2..). Francamente non capisco quelli che si ostinano a suonarla veloce, per esempio Diane Bish. Per cogliere le armonie di questa toccata è meglio che la si suoni così. Anche perché evidentemente l'acustica di Notre Dame ha un riverbero che dura più di cinque secondi, mi pare. Pure l'interpretazione di Ben Van Oosten è ottima a mio parere, al di sopra di tutte le altre, insuperabile.
AndreaPianoPlayer 2 years ago
Organ is the king/beast/master/lord
of all instruments
choirboy526 2 years ago 4
I like the speed of it here doesn't get all mushed up like most do. I think of the pedal line as the melody anyhow. It's harder to play it slower than rush through it.
32ContreBombarde 3 years ago 5
Correct on all points. This is the sort of tempo Widor intended - lets the power build up. St Sulpice has unique acoustics.
Wow - just heard the final chords - listen to it bark! Excellent!
iqi616 2 years ago
Yes, and the original manuscirpt clearly shows all manual notes to be played staccato.
So a fast tempo is not required to create excitement.
AndrewOrgelspieler 2 years ago
Thanks - this proves that the breakneck speed at which some people play the Toccata does not do it justice. CMW could not have played it fast at St Sulpice on the old tubular pneumatics!
Owdfolkie 3 years ago
Comment removed
johannuscro 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i don't think that Cavaille Coll bulit in st. Sulpice organ with tubular pneumatic, i belive that the organ there is mechanic with barker levers.
johannuscro 2 years ago 3
I think the reeds used are slightly too heavy and slightly drown out the top part. but otherwise its amazing!
Organs1234 3 years ago 4
Oh, how I love the sound of Notre Dame's 32' Contra Ophecleide. xDD
boltonbrowne 3 years ago 2
You mean 32' Bombarde boltonbrowne, the French do not like using German labels for their reeds!
ds1868 3 years ago 12
What is this Ophicleide you speak of? I hear no Ophicleide. Bad man. Also, wasn't the Ophicleide Hill & Son's reed, not a German manufacturer?
willowthebored 2 years ago
Sorry, I meant Bombarde.
Bombarde and Ophicleide are both powerful 16' reeds - easy to get them confused.
I suppose the 32' reed is a Contra Bombarde then...
boltonbrowne 2 years ago
Moj Boze, how beautiful! Dzieki!
JohnnyNW 3 years ago
So beautiful, I love the organ and even more the high vaulted ceilings of a cathedral.
pureLproductions 3 years ago 2
You know, this doesn't sound like Latry to me. It has a lot more feeling than his performances usually do, and even though all the French titular organists seem to understand the temp concept this seems even slower, which is very nice with the resonance of the cathdral (and maybe I'm wrong, but it almost sounds like the registry choices are different, because Latry's recording sounds much less dark and full.)
willowthebored 3 years ago
wow!?!? thats recorded on your phone? thats pretty good quality for a phone. gre8t video bty...
powerkites16 3 years ago
I've seen phones recording 720p clips and take 6+megapixel photos :), it's a completely different age now
redtails 3 years ago
You know - looking at the original Leduc edition, the 'double thump' is marked by such tiny appogiaturas that the whole thing could, by some, be taken as optional. And Widor himself, in his famous recording, smudged the affair by going half-and-half. Take a listen!
Regards
Paul :-)
marsvltor2 3 years ago
Hi Paul, What is the name of his recording? Jon
AllenOrganCrazy 3 years ago
AllenOrgan - sorry to take so long getting back to you. Widor's recording of the Toccata (and bits from the 'Gothique' symphonie, are regularly re-released by EMI. My own copy is from a French HMV LP set (Orgues & Organistes Francais en 1930), which also includes Tournemire, Vierne, Gigout, Dupre, and Bonnet actually playing. Stunning stuff. (C153-16411/5, released 1981). I have seen a CD containing not just the Widor, but Vierne, Dupre, and Messiaen also...take a look on the web...
marsvltor2 2 years ago
What an experience that must have been! Lucky lucky! The wildest and wooliest Cavaille Coll in existence, playing everyone's favorite.
ReillyDieffenbach 3 years ago 2
Sounds a little heavy. Dr. Carl Angelo in the US plays this to perfection.
pierresmom3 3 years ago
If that was a mobile phone, the audio is amazing. The organist is labouring a little; no doubt enjoying the resonance and registration, but makes the classic mistake of not applying the double chord at the end, and to my way of thinking, not holding the single high top 'F' note for long enough. Just my 2p from the UK.
eat911t 3 years ago
Sometimes the french do things well!
irkibby 3 years ago
you want to be careful there! French cathedrals are well renowned ;) we dont want to upset anyone!
animesis 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah... but it's just... they are French
irkibby 3 years ago
That's very good quality for a camera phone!
Thanks for posting this, phenomenal instrument.
qw3rtydud3 3 years ago
that IS some serious quality for a camera phone!
lwnf360 3 years ago
Fantastico. Sublime. E' emozionante ascoltare questa Toccata di Widor eseguita su un Cavaillé-Coll. Un suono inconfondibile...
AndreaPianoPlayer 3 years ago
i totally agree with you people ! Only it is actually slower than the "original version". I went to a concert at Notre Dame and being french i just love it ! They made it slower tio increase the "resonnance" in the cathedral !!
filouusa 3 years ago
To jutescrim. I know the score has a "double pump" at the end but truthfully I, for one, prefer it played the way we hear it in this presentation. I have a CD from Norte Dame with Olivier Latry playing Widor Toccata and there is no double pump at the end of that recording either. Technically, I suppose, it should be played as written, but giving the performer some latitude, provides a much bolder finish without the double pump.
tomandsueh 3 years ago
There is a ''double pump'' at the end only its done very fast about a 0.50 second delay just listen very carefully, Its most likely Olivier Latry playing this as it is the same on his recording but I think that the double pump is the best ending.
advisorC101 3 years ago
I love it!!
riggser2007 3 years ago 2
I assume this is the version played by Daniel Roth, the most powerful of all renditions, but perhaps a trifle stately. I would be grateful if someone would record the whole of this version on You Tube.
One criticism - no double thump on the last chord, clearly shown on the music score
jutescrim 3 years ago 5
since when is or has Daniel Roth ever been one of the three titulair at Notre Dame...the three people allowed to play the grand organ there...
i sang Widor's Mass there with both organs...
THAT WAS AN EXPERIENCE!
matt23071993 3 years ago
try midnight pipes with frederick hohman playing - excellent
lianni9181 3 years ago
I just wish you had had two phones with you to record the whole thing!!! Fab :o)
slinkybill3 3 years ago
that had such a big powerful sound dont u agree?
gamecrazy132 4 years ago 2
Very nice. I have heard this played on the Grand Organ at the Royal Albert Hall in London and it was superb.
JShobjj 4 years ago 2
notre dame cathedral has a 1868 cavaille coll organ.the organ has a trompette en chamade horizontaly sticking out of the case.
foodman27 4 years ago
A bit to loud! at the end but it is a lovely toccata Widor would be proud.
oakberry61woohalol 4 years ago
Must be almost mesmerizing/moving to actually be in the room when they really let this beast loose...wow
ryanwfrederick 4 years ago 3
For me the ultimte rendition of this piece of music was recorded and played by the celebrated French organist Daniel Roth on tne Organ of St. Sulpice, Paris - the sheer power and pace is trully magnificent and unsurpassed
I believe it was recorded on the CD - Widor: Complete Symphonies, Vol.5 on the Motette label. If anyone is intereested in hearing this please download to You Tube or advise me how I can
jutescrim 4 years ago
Thank you for this information. I love Daniel Roth and St. Sulpice. peace
2468HOTROD 4 years ago
Agreed - but try and get the recording on tape or LP - the transfer to CD, in my view, missed the magic...
marsvltor2 3 years ago
There aren't enough postings of the Liverpool Cathedral organs here - PLEASE POST
markdtp 4 years ago
It's the organ of Notre-Dame de Paris...
Tazeruk 4 years ago
Hey Mark, I feel the same way. A beautiful instrument, please let us hear more from Liverpool.
2468HOTROD 4 years ago
You know, I wish the Widor Toccata was played rather less: it's a fine piece that's become rather hackneyed. Also, notwithstanding recent alterations, the Notre Dame organ is still fabulous. Any chance of bringing us any recordings from Bath Abbey? Again, they could be linked to on Wikipedia...
EccentricRichard 4 years ago
I'm sure when there's next an organ recital from Bath Abbey, I'll record something from it - but there hasn't been one for some months, and I don't know when the next one is.
BritanniaRules 4 years ago
@EccentricRichard We heard this opus recently at St Sulpice whilst visiting the church, I will never forget the experience and I have been around a v long time.
The full version was played on BBC Radio 3 @a year ago. My poor Hacker radio was having a job coping with the volume of this magnificent instrument. Please would someone give details as to where we can obtain the cd or put the complete play on Youtube
jutescrim 1 year ago
This is fantastic, the best I have ever heard it played! What a pity it could not have been recorded in its entirety. Does anyone know where I could get a recording of this piece played on the organ of Notre Dame?
ziggyshedevil 4 years ago
Ziggy, You can find a recording of the piece on the instrument for and on which it was composed, St-Sulpice in Paris, on Daniel Roth's CD with the complete Widor 5th and Widor 10th "Romane" Symphonies. It's on the Motette label but could be out of print.
contratromba858 4 years ago
Latry recorded the 5 & 6 symphonie at the lable bnl but it's rather hard to find (I think they have it in the ohscatalog. And Latry is defenitly a better Widor-interpret then Roth (well,simply a better organist all together...)
ufni3p 4 years ago
Utter blasphamy! lol But I really like Olivier Latry too.
2468HOTROD 4 years ago
It is beatifull... This Bombardons, Tromppetts and Principals...
mlodyorganista 4 years ago
In respose to the Midmer-Losh in Atlantic city, it wasn't quite the exact tocatta. It was good, and the pedal well defined. And also, with the older tocatta with flutes, that organ is so intensely loud that you can kill ears with it. I like this tempo though. Virgil Fox was much too fast. Good, but fast.
cromorne 4 years ago
it was the widor toccata, but it is a poor quality recording with 8 seconds reverb, it doesnt make it clear. It does sound wonderfull though, it will be amazing to hear it all working again. Its restoration has started.
acchos 4 years ago
Are they planning to re-restore the Great Chamber? I have the "Senator's Masterpiece" video and would love to get a more in depth view of the stops. I heard in the bonus videos Jon Ledwon using the Grand Ophicleide. Like a boat horn.
cromorne 4 years ago
I love the tempo, since the acoustics are so rich, faster would just sound like a mess.
NeoMalikov 4 years ago
give the organist a break--this in no way replicates hearing the organ concerts at ND--you're listening on your PC. Hearing the organ concerts at ND almost made me give up my sinful ways.
youtubeuserwilly 4 years ago
Widor was quite concerned about organists playing
the piece too fast. This is in fact the proper tempo.
--Stuart
smcracraft 4 years ago
The organist here is Mr Benjamin Righetti, of the Church of La Tour-de-Peilz in Switzerland. It was recorded at the weekly 4.30pm Sunday recital on 4th February 2007.
BritanniaRules 4 years ago
Dear BritanniaRules, which model is it your cell phone?
The sound's quality is incredible!
juliusmax85 4 years ago 3
Hello. My phone is a Samsung SGH 900, which I bought over a year ago! I agree the sound quality is very good, though I'm sure phones with even better sound quality are available now.
BritanniaRules 4 years ago
I didn't say it wasn't good. There is just a very small irregularity in the right hand(and I mean very Small) wich is normal(it's the same when I play it) but that is one of the greatest strenghts of Latry that his ritme is solid as a rock. As for the error,that's something so small not worth mentioning.
ufni3p 4 years ago
I think you are just an avid Latry fan, which there is nothing wrong with that. But for you to say this playing is not good is actually quite ignorant. As an Organist/Choirmaster and College Professor of Organ I can tell you this is very good playing. Also, what mistake is it you all are speaking of? The only possible "mistake" I hear is a near side-swipe. Other than that, I hear no mistakes at all.
Christopher81 4 years ago
i like to play this piece of music quite easy but near to the perfect sound!
cinzano1985 4 years ago
When your arms ache after 15 seconds playing this you have a problem with your technic. Defenitly not Latry playing here, it's not good enough for his standards
ufni3p 4 years ago
You're right about the error, but you can't really expect them to get it right every time, i'm an organist myself and playing this piece makes your arms ache after 15 seconds worth.
BeFrSc 4 years ago
Who played this? Olivier Latry, Jean-Pierre Leguay or Phillippe Lefebvre? I have met Mr. Lefebvre on 2 occasions at the console of the Organ of Notre-Dame. It was deafening and unforgettable.
Shogunmiyuchan 4 years ago
I can't imagine either Latry or Lefèbvre playing in such a "stately" manner; it just doesn't fit their personalities. So my guess would be Leguay (unless, of course, it was another organist altogether, invited for the weekly recital).
chwidder 4 years ago
Exactly Desi! Having played at Notre Dame quite a few times myself, I can safely say this is a perfect tempo of this work. Desi has heard my playing of this work where I take it break neck speed a la V.F., but it also depends on the room. In France/Europe you take advantage of the rollin' acoustic!
Christopher81 4 years ago
This tempo is PERFECT. Some European organists always mention how American Organists like to take things so fast and unrelaxed. You can hear every note in the piece. And also...the room has about 6 seconds reverberation when packed.
DesireeDeFete 4 years ago
you should hear it from the midmer losh in atlantic city, astoundingly undiscribable. i thought it was a bit slow here.
acchos 4 years ago
I have heard a littke bit of it on the acch organ. Idon'e think it is that great because it is not supposed to be played with the diapason chorus consisting of what 13 or 14 diapason and a light mixture you have to have french solo reeds and mixtures with plenum and NO FLUTES. WHICH, WHO EVER PLAYED IT HAD FLUTES ON.
Bachlives2 4 years ago
The thing is, the recording of it on the acchos website isnt great quality. When John Ledwon plays it in the DVD it sounds amazing, its such a shame it didnt all work in the DVD, even worse now.
acchos 4 years ago
Probably they played like this because part of the instrument was inoperative at the time. Now the entire instrument is under restoration.
Renatodonadio 4 years ago
That was an answer to Bachlive
Renatodonadio 4 years ago
Every organist can, and should, play music and they personally interpret it. Otherwise they would all sound exactly same, Right? There really is not "Supposed To" and different organs have different groups of stops, not all of which are satisfactory. There are no fixed rules, and there should not be.
octave4 4 years ago 2
You want to hear this piece at Liverpool Cathedral! Utterly amazing!!
jona76 4 years ago
Which one? Also, neither of Liverpool's cathedral organs are anything like as good as the Notre Dame organ...
EccentricRichard 4 years ago
The organ at Liverpool Anglican Cathedral is definitely better than that of Notre Dame. The organ at Notre Dame is great, but has a tendency to shriek when certain stop combinations are used, whereas at liverpool, each combination produces a musical sound.
westcath 4 years ago
It's not bad, is it?
As for the error, I may be mistaken, but it's just before the last few chords at 2:00; a note or two seems a bit mangled there. Rather pernickety, I know...
BritanniaRules 5 years ago
exact, actually between 2:01 ans 2:02 when it becomes the "solo" arpeges when doing do-si-do (C-B-C) the first do slides a bit on ré (D). Rotunda57 is also right, the last chord is not doubled as written on part, but only pressed once (after all, organist does as he likes, personnaly I prefer to stick to what's written as musch as possible). Or it can be due to acoustic effect and/or microphone of your phone ;) (but rest is well recorded)
maxouf1 2 years ago
Amazing the sound quality that can be got with your cell phone. What was the "error?" The missing grace note on the last chord?
rotunda57 5 years ago