Compruebe por favor hacia fuera el punto del blog del Jesucristo ama por siempre amen y dice a todos que hablen y lean español El Jesucristo de mayo bendice le por siempre y a sus dos niños Gabriel y Janna ahora conocidos como Jeff Fisher y Marlin Bowell de Jane
Separe el mensaje por favor
El sitio para todo es El Jesucristo ama por siempre Amen y su un punto del blog
Soy tan emocionado que Richard Saskle me envió por correo electrónico
Lol! Even when she was nominated to a lower court, the Republicans still thought it necessary to obstruct? Idiots. They probably called her nasty shit too, only with different statements.
LOL one of my Senators, Senator Jim Inhofe was presiding as President Pro Tempore that day. I don't ever remember that. It's been a long time since the Strom Thurmond days.
inhofe was not the president pro tempore. President pro tempores rarely reside over hearings, instead junior senators, are put in, so they can learn more about the rules and how everything works in the senate.
I was not implying that Inhofe was the President Pro Tempore. I was implying that he was presiding as President Pro Tempore that current day of that current session of Congress.
Senator Leahy is clearly senile. Watch him at the introduction of the hearings for Judge Sotomayor. He mispeaks and cannot keep his thoughts straight. He keeps flubbing the infinitive, to swear. His time to quit politics has come.
Judges job is to ENFORCE the Constitution- NOT INTERPRET IT. The Constitution is CLEAR and written in plain English and is not at the Judges "Discretion". It is to be ENFORCED.. PERIOD! If you can't do that Sonia .. and it sounds like you can't and will not.. you should not be confirmed. It's sickening how the Dems kiss her ass. I mean the left/right paradigm doesnt matter anyways .. But whatever Reps did in the past doesn't excuse confirming a judge that wont enforce the Constitution.
The Founders were very intelligent and knew what the hell they were doing. The Constitution is very clear and is not a matter of opinion. Dems are "Grand Standing" here .. Yes if it were a Rep pres .. Reps probably woudl be too. Leaders need to put aside "loyalty" to their party. What matters is the people and serving them and what they want. Unfortunatly "politicians" are just that and only care about themselves. We need more Ron Pauls. Thank God Adam Kokesh and Rand Paul are running for 2010!
What? The judiciary does not interpret the Constitution? Of course it does! It's the executive branch that enforces, and the judiciary that interprets!
And the reason it needs to be interpreted is because it's not always clear. Example: the interstate commerce clause. How far does it go? A judicial interpretation can determine that.
Senator Leaky Leahy, you are the most Partisan senator in the senate. Senator, you should be ashamed of yourself for what you did to Estrada. You are a racist.
Yep, he should have to resign for crap like this, but nothing will happen. Left wing communists actually think Leahy was doing his duty to steamroll Miguel Estrada since he was Latino, then they come back and say why look at anything she has done, she's Puerto Rican. Who's gives a shit. Alito was Italian, and Clarence Thomas was African America, and they said their heritage guided them and their judgements, but NEVERRRRR did they say, it would make them a better judge then another race.
Democrats' demand for memos that Estrada had written while he was with the office. Some observers claimed that the Democrats also wished to avoid giving Bush points with Hispanic voters. The Democrats hotly contested this; however, internal memos to Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee
She's been overturned 3 times in over a decade on the bench. She's written hundreds of opinions over her career, so she's overturned less than 1% of the time.
Heck, when Scalia and Alito were on the federal courts, their opinions were overturned by the SC 100% of the time that the SC heard them!
Well if facts are important, specifically how many w/ Scalia and Alito? You brought it up.
And dodging on the basis of "identity politics" is a cop-out. Based on the very words that came out of her own mouth, it speaks to her judgment and potential bias if she assumes that she can render better opinions based on her gender and race.
As I said, in both cases, they were overruled less than 5 times. But every time their appeal was heard, it was overturned. I'm not going to google search for you when the info is publicly available.
In reality, I haven't actually said if I even support Sotomayor. Frankly, regarding the identity politics aspect of this, there is nothing I could say that would change your opinion. Your mind is already made up.
However, when talking about overturn rates, that's a matter of fact, not opinion.
That's really not good enough. It's your position, you research it and defend it. Otherwise the facts of which you speak are unsubstantiated. Don't make me do your heavy lifting.
And yes my mind is made up she is rabidly anti-2nd amendment, which that alone should disqualify her.
Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw, Rompilla v. Beard, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey are the three cases that SC overturned. Those are the only three cases that got to the SC while he was on the Court of Appeals.
Liberty Lobby v. Anderson is the only case I know of where Scalia was appealed to the SC; the SC overturned it.
Again, Scalia and Alito were overturned on 100% of the cases the SC heard appeals on, Sotomayor is 60%. Frankly, the overturn rate doesn't matter. That's my only point.
Well, she's had 4 reversals now on 6 cases where the SC granted cert. But what you've overlooked is the fact that she's written over 300 opinions while on the bench. So overall, she's overturned a little more than 1% of the time. So instead of 6:4, it's more like 300+:4.
Sonia Sotomayor is a leader of an intergalactic conspiracy and it is going to kidnap and eat all of us fine blond-haired God fearing Aryans.
Sonia's mother wears army boots.
If you take Sonia's height in centimeters and multiply it by my aunt Fanny's bra size in inches, you come up with 666, the number of the beast. Obviously, Sonia is the antichrist.
She is a member of LA RAZA. Translated to "THE GREAT RACE" It's like David Duke being elected to the Supreme Court. That's what Obama is doing and people are saying, Shut up don't ask about her, it doesn' matter she is racist...Latino is the other thing that matters...yet when Miguel Estrada came up, Latino was a problem said Chris Dodd, Democrat....internal memos
Just look up her record. "Sotomayor joined the National Council of La Raza.[24] "As a lawyer, she joined the National Council of La Raza and the board of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, two Hispanic civil rights groups that advocate for vigorous affirmative action. As a judge, she has repeatedly argued for diversity on the bench by alluding to the insights she gleaned from her Latina background.
Moron. La Raza translates to "The Race", not "The Great Race". Furthermore, David Duke was never entrusted to serve as a U.S. Federal Judge. La Raza has also never lynched people or intimidated countless people from voting or burned crosses in front of people's houses.
So you are for putting in a white European in the Supreme Court of Mexico right? Or how about a Black or Asian...lol..cough every country is racist except America. What color people fought against Slavery in the Civil War???? It was Whites. About the La Raza membership, you are kidding right, its the Black Pathers and KKK.
You must be a high school kid with your argument approach. The U.S. is not the White States of America. It is (theoretically - even though not actually) the government of all who are citizens. I'm not for "putting" anyone anywhere. I am for citizens of a country having the opportunity to partake in their judicial system and government. I live in the U.S. and not Mexico.
So did you back the Democrats when they steam rolled Miguel Estrada...I bet not. I guess you didn't read this part.
mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee
Dude. Stop repeating yourself on numerous polls. I don't support anyone "steamrolling" anyone...especially based on race. I think it's bullshit. I don't give a fuck what party you're from.
The race itself does not. Race doesn't have inherent abilities, it's the consequence placed on that race. The way you are treated , the bullshit you have to go through, the opportunities and privileges you don't have, and the stereotypes you face every day as a result of your race are a part of your overall person and have an impact on your ability to be empathetic. So, I do not live in your "cut and dry" world. But no, I am (fortunately) not in agreement with the likes of you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I agree with everything you said. You also didn't say you would be a better judge then a white, black, or asian male or female. Say that and you can kiss your law degree goodbye. Lifes struggles are how everyone develops, when you believe your struggles were tougher then everyone elses though, you become hated. No one wants to hear you are better then them, especially cause you say LATINO 25 times in a speech.
I don't even know what the fuck Mexico has to do with this besides a corny attempt at tying all Hispanics together. Good job. Try again.
Regardless of the blabbering by individuals like yourself, this woman will be in the Supreme Court. Regardless of what you want or say, I will go on to become an awesome attorney and (as a Latino) put up with small minded fuckers like you in an effort to advance my future generations. We will continue to make inroads. With or without you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
" don't even know what the fuck Mexico has to do with this besides a corny attempt at tying all Hispanics together."
You aren't understanding the analogy with Mexico. But Sotomayors definition of what makes a supreme court justice, a white, black, or asian man would be best suited to the next appointment to the Mexican or what ever country you use, Supreme Court. Think of what you're saying now, being a white minority and growing up in Mexico, doesn't make you special.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
" I will go on to become an awesome attorney and (as a Latino) put up with small minded fuckers like you in an effort to advance my future generations. We will continue to make inroads. With or without you. "
I hope you take the tests right? It's a test all races have to take right, no affirmative action for lawyers right? Also, nice you always mention "We will continue"...we as in who your race? When I say I want Americans to "make inroads" color never came to my mind. You scare me.
Because that doesn't mean anything if you say that. It's a general ass comment that ignores the real world structure and struggles. You don't scare me.
Read this "Democrats' demand for memos that Estrada had written while he was with the office. Some observers claimed that the Democrats also wished to avoid giving Bush points with Hispanic voters. The Democrats hotly contested this; however, internal memos to Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee " I see you just hate people.
gsuitter, I have a feeling this is BO's plan. He will throw Sotomayor under the bus, a favorite pass time of his, and say those meanies would not 'shut up' about that 2001 remark of hers. Obama is throwing the Latinos a bone. BHO has his real nominee waiting in the wings.
I hope Congress checks out her taxes, as in did she pay them all. The IRS needs the revenue & everytime Obama appoints someone it's a win-win situation for the IRS.
It wouldn't matter which woman Obama picked for the Supreme Court. GOP dumb-shits can only handle women as dumb as Scarah Failin as their LACK of masculinity doesn't feel threatened then. But, if you find a woman that's intelligent as Sotomayor or Hillary, they feel threatened, become full of hate & show their well-known hypocrisy.
The dumb-shit GOPs have to face the FACT Sotomayor WILL be nominated, because if she isn't, the GOP will lose the ENTIRE Hispanic & women vote in 2010 & 2012. LOL!
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life"
Sounds like a bigot, acts like a bigot, must be a bigot.
I think she is a fine choice. They told us they were going to bitch and whine weeks before he even made a choice so nobody should be surprised. I agree they should show their faces! What a bunch of cowards.
everydayism, you dont understand, only minority's can be racist bigoted pigs in public. People of white colored skin cannot be proud of a white man, that of course is racist.
First off you are a racist bigot, minorities don't get a free pass to be bigoted for no reason, that remark alone can be construed as racist abd prejudicial. Why be proud of any skin color, to what end do white men need to be proud as a group? Do you really need the uplifting? Secondly this judge agrees with some of your world view, look at her case with the firefighters and affirmative action. She ruled that the white firefighters were discriminated against.
Alberto Gonzales was and is an embarrassment to all minorities. He carried George Bush'es filthy bath water, and sanctioned its use for water boarding.. So when you talk about Minority appointments, Alberto Gonzales does not count.. He had as much wood as Woody the Wood Pecker! He was one of those Latino's that forgot where he came from.. He thought he came from Great Britain. Alberto "The Jesture" Gonzales, please carry me bath water to me mote!
There is no way the Republicans can refute this nomination without looking foolish.. They are going to use the race card, her health and all kinds of other ridiculous tactics..
But that is ok.. We will fight this nomination through on Youtube, just like all the other battles..
This Lady "Sotomayor" is going to the big leagues, and we are ready to brawl! Lets get it on!! For all you hard working beautiful Latina ladies, your time has come! Congratulations!!
It has been a long time coming Ephraim! Congratulations!
She will be sworn in! Barack Obama is the man! I hope all Latino's and Latina's are paying attention. The she has got more Jurisprudence experience than Alito, Scalia and John Roberts! That was one heck of a pick Obama! Picking a woman who has more Court Room Experience than 3 of her male counterparts..
Obama is Pitbull man! You Republicans are in trouble! I mean big trouble!
It should not take too long...Obama wants her to be confirmed by Sept 09 when the SCOTUS reconvenes. Considering the layout of the Senate I am 99% sure she will be confirmed. Hopefully!
This has been flagged as spam show
Compruebe por favor hacia fuera el punto del blog del Jesucristo ama por siempre amen y dice a todos que hablen y lean español El Jesucristo de mayo bendice le por siempre y a sus dos niños Gabriel y Janna ahora conocidos como Jeff Fisher y Marlin Bowell de Jane
Separe el mensaje por favor
El sitio para todo es El Jesucristo ama por siempre Amen y su un punto del blog
Soy tan emocionado que Richard Saskle me envió por correo electrónico
MrsMaryLouRoberts 2 years ago
Lol! Even when she was nominated to a lower court, the Republicans still thought it necessary to obstruct? Idiots. They probably called her nasty shit too, only with different statements.
whoo689 2 years ago
LOL one of my Senators, Senator Jim Inhofe was presiding as President Pro Tempore that day. I don't ever remember that. It's been a long time since the Strom Thurmond days.
GHFF77 2 years ago
inhofe was not the president pro tempore. President pro tempores rarely reside over hearings, instead junior senators, are put in, so they can learn more about the rules and how everything works in the senate.
nader85021 2 years ago
I was not implying that Inhofe was the President Pro Tempore. I was implying that he was presiding as President Pro Tempore that current day of that current session of Congress.
GHFF77 2 years ago
Senator Leahy is clearly senile. Watch him at the introduction of the hearings for Judge Sotomayor. He mispeaks and cannot keep his thoughts straight. He keeps flubbing the infinitive, to swear. His time to quit politics has come.
Saetta 2 years ago
Judges job is to ENFORCE the Constitution- NOT INTERPRET IT. The Constitution is CLEAR and written in plain English and is not at the Judges "Discretion". It is to be ENFORCED.. PERIOD! If you can't do that Sonia .. and it sounds like you can't and will not.. you should not be confirmed. It's sickening how the Dems kiss her ass. I mean the left/right paradigm doesnt matter anyways .. But whatever Reps did in the past doesn't excuse confirming a judge that wont enforce the Constitution.
vinnykster 2 years ago
The Founders were very intelligent and knew what the hell they were doing. The Constitution is very clear and is not a matter of opinion. Dems are "Grand Standing" here .. Yes if it were a Rep pres .. Reps probably woudl be too. Leaders need to put aside "loyalty" to their party. What matters is the people and serving them and what they want. Unfortunatly "politicians" are just that and only care about themselves. We need more Ron Pauls. Thank God Adam Kokesh and Rand Paul are running for 2010!
vinnykster 2 years ago
What? The judiciary does not interpret the Constitution? Of course it does! It's the executive branch that enforces, and the judiciary that interprets!
And the reason it needs to be interpreted is because it's not always clear. Example: the interstate commerce clause. How far does it go? A judicial interpretation can determine that.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
You ARE aware that the Constitution has Amendments right? That comment is not as ignorant as I think right?
Boobalopbop 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The problem was President then, Bill Clinton.
imbeachasbro 2 years ago
Senator Leaky Leahy, you are the most Partisan senator in the senate. Senator, you should be ashamed of yourself for what you did to Estrada. You are a racist.
rosie21114 2 years ago
Yep, he should have to resign for crap like this, but nothing will happen. Left wing communists actually think Leahy was doing his duty to steamroll Miguel Estrada since he was Latino, then they come back and say why look at anything she has done, she's Puerto Rican. Who's gives a shit. Alito was Italian, and Clarence Thomas was African America, and they said their heritage guided them and their judgements, but NEVERRRRR did they say, it would make them a better judge then another race.
papavalium 2 years ago
Democrats' demand for memos that Estrada had written while he was with the office. Some observers claimed that the Democrats also wished to avoid giving Bush points with Hispanic voters. The Democrats hotly contested this; however, internal memos to Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee
papavalium 2 years ago
papa, you are absolutely right. Some people just cant handle the truth about the Dingbat Democratic party.
rosie21114 2 years ago
Leahy is a dirtbag like the rest of them.
Sotomayor's opinions have been overturned on numerous occasions and is blinded by racism and sexism.
bwhite53 2 years ago
She's been overturned 3 times in over a decade on the bench. She's written hundreds of opinions over her career, so she's overturned less than 1% of the time.
Heck, when Scalia and Alito were on the federal courts, their opinions were overturned by the SC 100% of the time that the SC heard them!
qwertyman129 2 years ago
How many opnions of Scalia's and Alito's are you talking about? That also doesn't adress the fact that she is an admitted racist!
bwhite53 2 years ago
No more than a handful in either case. Point being, 3 is nowhere close to "numerous" and she does better than the typical overturn rate of 65-75%.
I'm not getting into matters of identity politics, because there is nowhere good that will go.
Just try not to be factually incorrect when talking about a judge's record, ok?
qwertyman129 2 years ago
Well if facts are important, specifically how many w/ Scalia and Alito? You brought it up.
And dodging on the basis of "identity politics" is a cop-out. Based on the very words that came out of her own mouth, it speaks to her judgment and potential bias if she assumes that she can render better opinions based on her gender and race.
bwhite53 2 years ago
As I said, in both cases, they were overruled less than 5 times. But every time their appeal was heard, it was overturned. I'm not going to google search for you when the info is publicly available.
In reality, I haven't actually said if I even support Sotomayor. Frankly, regarding the identity politics aspect of this, there is nothing I could say that would change your opinion. Your mind is already made up.
However, when talking about overturn rates, that's a matter of fact, not opinion.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
That's really not good enough. It's your position, you research it and defend it. Otherwise the facts of which you speak are unsubstantiated. Don't make me do your heavy lifting.
And yes my mind is made up she is rabidly anti-2nd amendment, which that alone should disqualify her.
bwhite53 2 years ago
Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw, Rompilla v. Beard, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey are the three cases that SC overturned. Those are the only three cases that got to the SC while he was on the Court of Appeals.
Liberty Lobby v. Anderson is the only case I know of where Scalia was appealed to the SC; the SC overturned it.
Again, Scalia and Alito were overturned on 100% of the cases the SC heard appeals on, Sotomayor is 60%. Frankly, the overturn rate doesn't matter. That's my only point.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
Excellent bird-dogging your assertions. You, sir are a man willing to back up what you say with the evidence. My respect.
bwhite53 2 years ago
6:3 ratio, 6 opinions , 3 reversals.
Chslosers 2 years ago
Well, she's had 4 reversals now on 6 cases where the SC granted cert. But what you've overlooked is the fact that she's written over 300 opinions while on the bench. So overall, she's overturned a little more than 1% of the time. So instead of 6:4, it's more like 300+:4.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is next? Be creative. Let me help.
Sonia Sotomayor is a leader of an intergalactic conspiracy and it is going to kidnap and eat all of us fine blond-haired God fearing Aryans.
Sonia's mother wears army boots.
If you take Sonia's height in centimeters and multiply it by my aunt Fanny's bra size in inches, you come up with 666, the number of the beast. Obviously, Sonia is the antichrist.
where do you people come from?
naresh0131 2 years ago
and they had to wait for 11 years later to finally apoint her. What a joke.
texas224 2 years ago
She is a member of LA RAZA. Translated to "THE GREAT RACE" It's like David Duke being elected to the Supreme Court. That's what Obama is doing and people are saying, Shut up don't ask about her, it doesn' matter she is racist...Latino is the other thing that matters...yet when Miguel Estrada came up, Latino was a problem said Chris Dodd, Democrat....internal memos
papavalium 2 years ago
Where did you get that info? I have never heard that. I've heard the comments that she has said in the past, but have never heard this.
Panchoroy 2 years ago
What part didn't you hear?
papavalium 2 years ago
The La Raza part.
Panchoroy 2 years ago 2
Just look up her record. "Sotomayor joined the National Council of La Raza.[24] "As a lawyer, she joined the National Council of La Raza and the board of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, two Hispanic civil rights groups that advocate for vigorous affirmative action. As a judge, she has repeatedly argued for diversity on the bench by alluding to the insights she gleaned from her Latina background.
papavalium 2 years ago
Moron. La Raza translates to "The Race", not "The Great Race". Furthermore, David Duke was never entrusted to serve as a U.S. Federal Judge. La Raza has also never lynched people or intimidated countless people from voting or burned crosses in front of people's houses.
SO just die and go to hell.
thundakat29 2 years ago
So you are for putting in a white European in the Supreme Court of Mexico right? Or how about a Black or Asian...lol..cough every country is racist except America. What color people fought against Slavery in the Civil War???? It was Whites. About the La Raza membership, you are kidding right, its the Black Pathers and KKK.
papavalium 2 years ago
You must be a high school kid with your argument approach. The U.S. is not the White States of America. It is (theoretically - even though not actually) the government of all who are citizens. I'm not for "putting" anyone anywhere. I am for citizens of a country having the opportunity to partake in their judicial system and government. I live in the U.S. and not Mexico.
thundakat29 2 years ago
So did you back the Democrats when they steam rolled Miguel Estrada...I bet not. I guess you didn't read this part.
mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee
papavalium 2 years ago
Dude. Stop repeating yourself on numerous polls. I don't support anyone "steamrolling" anyone...especially based on race. I think it's bullshit. I don't give a fuck what party you're from.
thundakat29 2 years ago
So you agree with me, race has nothing to do with making a qualified and empathetic decision.
papavalium 2 years ago
The race itself does not. Race doesn't have inherent abilities, it's the consequence placed on that race. The way you are treated , the bullshit you have to go through, the opportunities and privileges you don't have, and the stereotypes you face every day as a result of your race are a part of your overall person and have an impact on your ability to be empathetic. So, I do not live in your "cut and dry" world. But no, I am (fortunately) not in agreement with the likes of you.
thundakat29 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I agree with everything you said. You also didn't say you would be a better judge then a white, black, or asian male or female. Say that and you can kiss your law degree goodbye. Lifes struggles are how everyone develops, when you believe your struggles were tougher then everyone elses though, you become hated. No one wants to hear you are better then them, especially cause you say LATINO 25 times in a speech.
papavalium 2 years ago
LOL. Funny how we tend to apply certain principles only when convenient. Only when it hurts the existing power structure.
thundakat29 2 years ago
Semantics, semantics. Oh how we all dwell on semantics when we want to ignore the underlying real-world issues. It's amusing.
thundakat29 2 years ago
I don't even know what the fuck Mexico has to do with this besides a corny attempt at tying all Hispanics together. Good job. Try again.
Regardless of the blabbering by individuals like yourself, this woman will be in the Supreme Court. Regardless of what you want or say, I will go on to become an awesome attorney and (as a Latino) put up with small minded fuckers like you in an effort to advance my future generations. We will continue to make inroads. With or without you.
thundakat29 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
" don't even know what the fuck Mexico has to do with this besides a corny attempt at tying all Hispanics together."
You aren't understanding the analogy with Mexico. But Sotomayors definition of what makes a supreme court justice, a white, black, or asian man would be best suited to the next appointment to the Mexican or what ever country you use, Supreme Court. Think of what you're saying now, being a white minority and growing up in Mexico, doesn't make you special.
papavalium 2 years ago
I never said that. Dude, she's getting confirmed. This is pointless and moot.
thundakat29 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
" I will go on to become an awesome attorney and (as a Latino) put up with small minded fuckers like you in an effort to advance my future generations. We will continue to make inroads. With or without you. "
I hope you take the tests right? It's a test all races have to take right, no affirmative action for lawyers right? Also, nice you always mention "We will continue"...we as in who your race? When I say I want Americans to "make inroads" color never came to my mind. You scare me.
papavalium 2 years ago
Because that doesn't mean anything if you say that. It's a general ass comment that ignores the real world structure and struggles. You don't scare me.
thundakat29 2 years ago
Maybe you should stay off YouTube, your ignorance is showing.
pk5787 2 years ago
Read this "Democrats' demand for memos that Estrada had written while he was with the office. Some observers claimed that the Democrats also wished to avoid giving Bush points with Hispanic voters. The Democrats hotly contested this; however, internal memos to Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee " I see you just hate people.
papavalium 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The Second Amendment applies ONLY to limitations the FEDERAL government seeks to impose on this right.
—Opinion of the court, including Judge Sotomayor, Maloney v. Cuomo 2009
In other words the constitution does not apply to state and local government infringement of your 2nd amendment rights.
What other constitutional rights would she apply this theory to? Try again Obama, this nominee doesn't cut it!
gsuitter 2 years ago
gsuitter, I have a feeling this is BO's plan. He will throw Sotomayor under the bus, a favorite pass time of his, and say those meanies would not 'shut up' about that 2001 remark of hers. Obama is throwing the Latinos a bone. BHO has his real nominee waiting in the wings.
sixletter 2 years ago
I hope Congress checks out her taxes, as in did she pay them all. The IRS needs the revenue & everytime Obama appoints someone it's a win-win situation for the IRS.
sixletter 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It wouldn't matter which woman Obama picked for the Supreme Court. GOP dumb-shits can only handle women as dumb as Scarah Failin as their LACK of masculinity doesn't feel threatened then. But, if you find a woman that's intelligent as Sotomayor or Hillary, they feel threatened, become full of hate & show their well-known hypocrisy.
The dumb-shit GOPs have to face the FACT Sotomayor WILL be nominated, because if she isn't, the GOP will lose the ENTIRE Hispanic & women vote in 2010 & 2012. LOL!
mavrek47 2 years ago
Let her have her date in court. Either up or down. The senate(Republicans...) should just give her a vote up or down. That's all she deserves.
Fellowdc2007 2 years ago
Democrats control the senate. She is going to win. And that is unfortunate. She is a disgrace. She is a racist, and a bigot.
ravenxcult 2 years ago
even fox news is saying that voices calling her a racist came from the "far right"...
veej309 2 years ago
did his hair die?
ManEatingLunchBox 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am dead
2. You are next
3. Someone will kill you in the next 5 hours
4. Post to 6 other videos or youll die
brewheezy 2 years ago
l think that a nice choice, judge sonia sotomayors .
justknow20 2 years ago
i think that a nice choice ,judge Sonia Sotomayors.
justknow20 2 years ago
Sonia Sotomayo SAID:
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life"
Sounds like a bigot, acts like a bigot, must be a bigot.
putittogether 2 years ago
We should understand that racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty.
Dr. Ron Paul
putittogether 2 years ago
" Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of a groups, rather than individuals..."
Dr. Ron Paul
putittogether 2 years ago
I think she is a fine choice. They told us they were going to bitch and whine weeks before he even made a choice so nobody should be surprised. I agree they should show their faces! What a bunch of cowards.
Smartassawhip 2 years ago
Pull your head out of your ass you ignorant moron
philosopherking34 2 years ago
Wet back in da house bitches !!! omg please Cheney take her hunting.
R4zz1 2 years ago
Obama is gonna fill 3 more justice seats over his 8 year presidency.
PRO LIFERS are scared shitless.
Coat hangar sales will be through the roof.
whitecollarcriminal 2 years ago
Unless Kennedy, Scalia, or Thomas leaves the bench, conservatives have nothing to worry about.
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
A man who speaks the truth.
JessicaMMudd 2 years ago 3
It's so curious with minorities/latinos/whoever, EVERYTHING is about race. EVERYTHING. But it's the white man that has issues with racism.
Yeah, OK, sure.
Then I should say, 'YOU GO LEAHY!!' Isn't it great to see a white senator or a white man in an important position?!' Yeeeaaaa!!
everydayism 2 years ago
everydayism, you dont understand, only minority's can be racist bigoted pigs in public. People of white colored skin cannot be proud of a white man, that of course is racist.
putittogether 2 years ago 3
First off you are a racist bigot, minorities don't get a free pass to be bigoted for no reason, that remark alone can be construed as racist abd prejudicial. Why be proud of any skin color, to what end do white men need to be proud as a group? Do you really need the uplifting? Secondly this judge agrees with some of your world view, look at her case with the firefighters and affirmative action. She ruled that the white firefighters were discriminated against.
P.S. Your an idiot.
DarkEscaflowne 2 years ago
DarkEscaflowne, what are you child or something? How is what I have written in ANY way racist? My statements point out racism.
putittogether 2 years ago
She'll be the sixth Catholic on the Supreme Court. Who's running this court...the Pope?
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
Alberto Gonzales was and is an embarrassment to all minorities. He carried George Bush'es filthy bath water, and sanctioned its use for water boarding.. So when you talk about Minority appointments, Alberto Gonzales does not count.. He had as much wood as Woody the Wood Pecker! He was one of those Latino's that forgot where he came from.. He thought he came from Great Britain. Alberto "The Jesture" Gonzales, please carry me bath water to me mote!
S197V6TT 2 years ago
Anti-Hispanic bigot.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
I am half Hispanic and I agree with S197V6tt
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
If Alberto Gonzales was a Democrat your comment would be gushing with praise for him.
abarzilai664 2 years ago
Clinton got a BJ from her too.
2010mustangs 2 years ago
"The Second Amendment applies only to limitations the federal government seeks to impose on this right.
—Opinion of the court, including Judge Sotomayor, Maloney v. Cuomo 2009
Everything I've read tells me this woman is not qualified for the Supreme Court of the Land.
gsuitter 2 years ago
Leahy, the rabid anti-Hispanic, is looking to repair his image after he savagely attacked Attorney General Gonzales based on his ethnicity.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
This video was taken in 1998, you moron. Take your LOLRACIST crap elsewhere.
starkshift 2 years ago 2
There is no way the Republicans can refute this nomination without looking foolish.. They are going to use the race card, her health and all kinds of other ridiculous tactics..
But that is ok.. We will fight this nomination through on Youtube, just like all the other battles..
This Lady "Sotomayor" is going to the big leagues, and we are ready to brawl! Lets get it on!! For all you hard working beautiful Latina ladies, your time has come! Congratulations!!
S197V6TT 2 years ago
It has been a long time coming Ephraim! Congratulations!
She will be sworn in! Barack Obama is the man! I hope all Latino's and Latina's are paying attention. The she has got more Jurisprudence experience than Alito, Scalia and John Roberts! That was one heck of a pick Obama! Picking a woman who has more Court Room Experience than 3 of her male counterparts..
Obama is Pitbull man! You Republicans are in trouble! I mean big trouble!
S197V6TT 2 years ago
Wow, he looks exactly the same 10 years ago as he does today. Its like he stopped aging.
ComplexKid441 2 years ago
Sold his soul to the Devil, eh?
That would also help to explain his behavior in the Senate over that past decade, the anti-American pos.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
Well, I wasn't suggesting that...just making an observation. Not everything has to be political.
ComplexKid441 2 years ago
Let's not be too hasty here, Pat.
Sotomayor may have cracked a joke about taking some cholo's tamale into her mouth back when she was an assistant district attorney in New York.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
Comment removed
putittogether 2 years ago
you meant a TRAITOR ... you inbred illiterate fuck?
interestingperson121 2 years ago 2
>>> otomayor, is a TRADER to the US Constitution.
LOL. You are a "TRADER" to the English language. Maybe even a traitor too.
zzzfore 2 years ago
Why do you say she is a traitor to the constitution? what proof do you have?
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
>>>Why do you say she is a traitor to the constitution? what proof do you have?
I am not saying that. I am responding (and disagreeing) with someone else who said that.
zzzfore 2 years ago
...cause she states judges make the law from the bench... is one reason
concerned00citizen 2 years ago
you have no proof that she is a traitor to the constitution.
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
.....how long is her confirmation going to take this time?....
hajqbvii 2 years ago
It should not take too long...Obama wants her to be confirmed by Sept 09 when the SCOTUS reconvenes. Considering the layout of the Senate I am 99% sure she will be confirmed. Hopefully!
SkyDaddy7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SkyDaddy7, Sotomayor is a horrible human being. She detest freedom and liberty. In fact she has work her whole legal life to DESTROY the Constitution
putittogether 2 years ago
Are you truly that ignorant or do you just like to act that way for attention?
SkyDaddy7 2 years ago 2