@Jordanrichie100 How old are you? You can't debate because you don't have an answer so you go on about my mother? If you seemed to me like a trustworthy, sincere, adult person then maybe I would've been offended. Saved of that...
@Jordanrichie100 once again ur only comment is telling me to go away.thats half of ur comment making a stupid joke about my username, and you have yet to answer my first question. maybe u dont support her for president but u do support her. so before u right back PLEASE answer my first question of why do u hate him. AND then try to make a decent come back. =D
@Jordanrichie100 actually ignore my other comment. after seeing your channel and reading other comments u posted. i realised ur no more than a sarah palin fan boy. u try making it sound as though ur smarter than others but really ur not. Ur just trying to show support for a stupid politician who of course you can easily relate to. So yea your sad. Say what ever you want back to me now cause it dosent matter. You support a person who dosent know the founding fathers. and she was running for pres
@Jordanrichie100 wait i didnt look like an ass tho and u didnt answer anything. And honestly you make really stupid insults " come over to my house so i can shit down your skinny ass neck " wtf was that? THATS pathetic. My comments take like 20 sec to write and they are still better than your pieces of shit
@Jordanrichie100 Ah, your answer defenitly shows everyone who comes to look at this video who of us is the smarter one, and who is the mong.
Besides, you still used the word "foreigner" as if it would be insulting. Not only that, but you were also wrong since he is an American, i.e. not a foreigner to you.
@Jordanrichie100 You do know that your country is built completely by foreigners, right? Poor foreigners who couldn't find work or other means of supporting themselves at home, and traveled to America, just like for an example Mexicans, whom you hate. Unless you're an Indian, you can't really get away with calling someone else who lives in your country a foreigner as something negative and get away with it.
@Jordanrichie100 the fucks with all the hate? u mad because all he said was true? and what the hell is up with your fucking comment dude you put way too much time writing it.
Once upon a time, the money that corporations made was invested back into the system in order to create industry, jobs etc. But those days are long gone. Corporations now hoard their money and no jobs are being created. The poor can't create jobs, therefore our salvation lies with the corporations. But they no longer wish to play the game. So I say we TAX THE F*****S HARD!!
@syzygy502 You know why? Because the constitution was written perfectly. It was a pack of whiny liberals who decided to change it and start adding amendments! Freedom of speech? More like freedom to be a traitor. Freedom of religion? More like freedom to spit in the face of God who created you. All amendments are anti-American, and you know it! That's why the GOP officially recognizes none of them. Not one! You bleeding heart liberals need to get out of our country and make your own.JK
@skuzzkitty All amendments are anti-American?? If slavery is American, then I am ashamed to be an American. But, I know that's not American, and I know we can make a change for the better if we vote OBAMA2012. You're right, the amendments were necessary and the GOP are idiots for not recognizing them. Read before you post please.
@syzygy502 i don't want to make you feel bad or anything... but JK stands for just kidding. As in... i was being sarcastic, as in... tag, you're the idiot now. have a nice day!
@syzygy502 i don't want to make you feel bad or anything... but JK stands for just kidding. As in... i was being sarcastic, as in... tag, you're the idiot now. have a nice day!
Topics: Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
I have a suggestion for all you Republicans that want to fix the budget. First we increase taxes on those earning 200 thousand dollars or more to 35%. Then we cap incomes at 50 million dollars a year. I mean who the hell needs more than 50 million dollars a year. It's not like you can take it with you when you die. If you have a problem with this just ask anyone in the middle class how they have felt having to foot the bill for so long and then have the benefits they paid into taken away!
@BramSLI1 I don't necessarily like the cap of income, but they can't steal it from the middle-class taxpayer. They just need to be taxed more. Instead the republicans are trying to get rid of all taxes for the people who make more than a quarter-million dollars a year. All taxes under the Ryan plan would be eliminated or cut by more than 75%. Taxes for the middle-class person would be more than tripled to over 80%. The republicans are the real redistributors of wealth. They can make a projector.
for you people who are confused and dont understand this idiot palin she is just a plant. she was planted in power to cause as much chaos and mischief as possible. thats all nothing more. just like bachman and the rest of those idiots were planted to cause the destruction of society.
Christians will ALWAYS get bashed, especially Christian women like Palin. She stands for God and Country, the foundation of this country and good values that our nation has gotten away from. Some people should understand that when a godly person has mission and passion for what is right and good to better mankind and doing the will of God....you CANNOT stop a person like that. "If God is for us, who can stand against us?" - Romans 8:31
@christiancharlie I am a christian woman and want Sarah as far away from government as possible. Just because you are christian doesnt make you prepared to lead a country.
@christiancharlie We're not bashing her cause she's a strong Christian. We're bashing her b/c she's an idiot. She can't name a founding forefather. She can't describe the Bush Doctrine, her idea of foreign policy is being able to see Russia from Alaska and I think if you ask her about her views on cap and trade she'd reply with the business model for Coke-a-Cola. Yikes!! I'm not religious but theres a vast amount of SMART Christians in Politics who are more qualified who are just as religious
@christiancharlie This has nothing to do with her religion. She is unfit to lead a girl scout troop let alone a nation of millions. She has neither the experience nor the fundamental knowledge one would expect a president or vice president to have.
@christiancharlie I love that Palin's main defense is that she is Christian. She doesn't have to understand politics and know basic history because she is Christian. What does her faith have to do with her understanding basic facts? If your kid gets a wrong answer on a test do you accuse their teacher of victimizing them because they are Christian? It is absurd.
@freedomfighter790 Kind of funny that the Democrats are the ones who understand the Bill of Rights and the republicans don't understand any of the 10 amendments for it.
If I was 90 years old or if I was terminally ill I'd love to see Sarah Palin in power. I'd enjoy some really fucking hilarious last years of my life and go out with a boom (literally since she'd do something stupid enough to start a third world war or something). I know, I'm selfish but to be honest, humanity deserves a Sarah Palin now.
@fablan6 These guys are really really great. I'm scuba diving all over YouTube to see if their logic applies to the second amendment as well. I mean really...why aren't these guys on television, and not on some third world 'net station?
@BigWillieDude You have been reported. You republicans are such hippocrites. If you truly think that freedom is not free, pay some taxes to help financing.
Just in case Sarah ever comes by this video (which she won't):
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The victim mentality is so last season. Now, it's that she expects people to cater to her viewpoint and doesn't fully comprehend the essentials of our government's house and keeping. She can rebuff, claiming that society has lost its integrity, and she doesn't want cheap slander and defaming brought to an honest table.
holy crap.... does this guy not realize that point of the media is to report everything that people would want to hear?!?!?!? as of that point in time, most of the media was reporting bad about the right side (NOTHING good), and they wouldn't say a word about the left becuz they knew that Obama had given ppl hope and that reporting anything bad about him would make ppl hate the news station.
@IceMetalPunk Don't be sad, sit back, cook some popcorn maybe smoke a bowl or two, and watch history being made..
Fuck them all.. The vast majority of the population are, and always have been sheep, members of a flock... Even with modern technology people ignore the truth and go with the crowd, not bothering to look into anything..
Back in the day the library was a key to education, now we have the internet available and people use it for what? Facebook.. Fucking Farmville, and music videos.
@IceMetalPunk If they do it as a comedy piece it could be quite entertaining. Kind of like Fox "news". The only problem is too many people will take it seriously. Kind of like Fox "news".
@3153dee How about we change that to the motto of the Democratic Party? I think we'll win some more elections. Then we can force her out of her hole in Alaska and more people can see her for the slobbering simp she is. Oh man, I hope she doesn't read this. She might throw her poop at me and then jump up and down and call me sexist. And accuse me of wanting to kill her baby, almost forgot that one.
@mrjohantheman well, it's more in a grey area. hard drugs are illegal, but people still use it, so our government thought it would be best to make the use of the drugs safer...
and guess what? hough we have legalized soft drugs, and we even have methods to give people a safe use of harddrugs, the only country's that have lower drugsabuse rates are in scandinavia, like sweden...so, that's cool
@mrjohantheman nope, a town in the eastern part of the country...
and the coffeeshops in the netherlands are famous because you can buy a really small amount of legalized drugs in there...most of them are in amsterdam
i love how stupid she is. if she did become VP its a good thing that VPs dont really do much and have much power in all reality. their basically the presidents lacky. their most important job is to go to other countries for meeting/press bullshit that the president doesnt give enough shits to go to... thats a direct quote from the govermnent teacher lol
What she is talking about is the unqualified use of lies. The attacks on conservitives is used all the time without a counter attack, but if anyone calls the liberal bluff they go crazy. If no one can see this, then they are being self decieved.
This is the same tactic used by the Muslims. They can call a Christian anything they want, and get no backlash. But let anyone say anything about Muslims and all HELL breaks loose. So get a life and start telling the TRUTH.
"What she is talking about is the unqualified use of lies"
You mean like claiming "death panels" that no one can point me to are in the HC plan?
"The attacks on conservitives"
You really think conservatives are such "victims"? Hannity, Rush, Beck, etc have made a career on attacks/lies. Then we can go though: birthers, claims of being a Muslim, a Nazi, etc.
Really dude, conservatives aren't these innocent little lambs you paint them out to be.
@hipstermi Do you bet your honor that there are no boards, individuals, panels, committees or agencies in Obamacare, who have the power to deny you or anyone else any care, treatment, procedure, technology, medicine, drug, or other need?
"Do you bet your honor that there are no boards, individuals"
You are repeating a question I told you I WOULD answer ... when you answered MY question I asked first. I already told you about your child like posts about repeating things. So instead of my reply...just go back 7-9 pages and read what I wrote then, asshole.
Proving once again you are afraid to answer my questions and like a child just repeat things.
again...i said I WOULD answer this if you answered mine first.
@hipstermi Do you bet your honor that there are no boards, panels, committees, agencies, secretaries, directors, or other bodies created by Obamacare, which have the power to limit your choices, withold treatment, medicines, drugs, procedures, technologies, or other things concerning your health care? Either you lie to yourself, pretending to believe falsehood, or you just lie to everyone else, wanting them to believe untruth. Which is it?
"ither you lie to yourself, pretending to believe falsehood, or you just lie to everyone else, wanting them to believe untruth. Which is it?"
That's a conservative lie on your part again.
Conservatives often aren't to bright, so they don't know their plows are obvious. You repeat yourself like a child as noted...but you frame your conservative lie question with only 2 possible outcomes as quoted. You conservative lie by implying these are the only 2.
@hipstermi There ARE only two possible answers, you idiot. Are there boards, panels, committees, commissions, secretaries, or any other bodies which have the power to prevent, refuse, control, limit, or otherwise in any way control availability to treatment, technology, medicines, drugs, procedures, or any other facet of health care? The question has ONLY two possible answers. "Yes" or "No". No dissembling on your part about semantics is valid, it's just more untruth and dishonesty.
@hipstermi LOL, that's right, there are only TWO possible choices... A the panels exist, or B, you're a liar. You see, there is no other choice. There is the truth, and there are people who tell lies. The truth is, they exist, and there is no means of disputing it, it is FACT. Just as gravity is fact. Anything else, is just a lie.
OK asshole, HC is here. A year from now when there are no "death panels" will you admit to being wrong? or being stupid enough to believe Palin?
This is just like when you claimed a misdemeanor is not a crime. I was right, you were wrong, and you just clammed up. you looked so fucking stupid over that one....your "silent running" betrayed your conservative cowardice.
@hipstermi Uhhh... Ok, you're finally taking a stand. Well, congratulations on being a brain dead idiot. Of course there are "death panels". In fact, there are over a dozen entities created within Obamacare that have the power to take your health care choices away from you and your doctor and make them by unelected beaurocrats. The FDA has already started the process of deciding which drugs and medicines to de-certify on the basis of "cost".
" fact, there are over a dozen entities created within Obamacare that have the power to take your health care choices away from you and your doctor and make them by unelected beaurocrats"
Can you specifically name a few of them? and a vague section...give me specifics.
When I go to the conservative pages, the things they claim are this...really aren't.
You know if you call a tomato an onion that doesn't make it so either.
"power to take your health care choices away from you"
you are confused...the take choices away already exist. PPOs give limited choice. The "pre existing conditions"...screw over for stuff you were born with limits choice and coverage.
I have a friend down to one kidney and your conservative loved system has him paying out of pocket due to his pre existing conditions. someone like him nable to make the cash...i wonder why you guys didnt cry "death panels" years earlier?
@hipstermi No, YOU are confused. Something not being covered by insurance (a contract between you and a company) in no way limits your choices. If you choose a PPO, that's your tough luck and you'll have to pay outside of it for whatever you want. When government limits it, YOU HAVE NO OPTION. Duhhhh. As usual, your responses are as stupid as one can possibly be.
"Something not being covered by insurance (a contract between you and a company) in no way limits your choices"
People are DENIED coverage. How is that not "limit"? People have died due to this... you know, what you guys claim the HC bill will have happen with "death panels"?
"If you choose a PPO, that's your tough luck "
Some employers don't give you a lot of "choice" in the matter.
1. what "options" do people with "pre existing conditions" who can't get coverage have in the old failed system? People were turned down for coverage and many died.
2. since insurance companies made the call on who was covered or had pre existings...how was that different than a "death panel"
@hipstermi Why must people's choices be limited to that which government, in its infinite stupidity, thinks it has the power to enforce? Or, why should health care be linked to EITHER insurance OR employment? It should not be, anymore than cars or food. It should be nothing other than a service you choose to use, and health insurance be a financial protection from catastrophic losses - you know, like any other insurance.
@hipstermi First, either you're know panels exist, or, you're the most ignorant idiot to walk the face of the earth. And, since you're claiming to be able to debate the topic, you've declared yourself knowledgeable. Thus, to say 'no they don't" is a lie. Flat out a lie. It's like standing on the street at noon and saying "the sun stopped shining". Nobody takes you seriously, because no matter how you argue, reality has not changed.
"And, since you're claiming to be able to debate the topic, you've declared yourself knowledgeable. Thus, to say 'no they don't" is a lie"
Odd...you were unable or unwilling to provide a direct quote to prove your claim.
and no a "consultation" doesn't "prove" a death panel. you conservative lied about it all for your political agenda...or you just gave in to the usual conservative fear factor tricks.
@hipstermi I will NEVER "obey" your demands. You do not command me. Your inferior understanding of reality has failed to teach you the essential message... That reality triumphs over liberal fantasy EVERY time.
"fantasy" ? we have conservative assholes tell us Obama is "like Hitler" when no one has been killed. In this fantasy, conservatives ignore Germany' conservative/Christian roots...but think they are fighting "bad guys" like WW2. (despite Bush family business dealings with Nazis...)
Then you have the conservatives who think it's part of the "anti Christ". Again...fantasy of invisible beings with MAGICAL POWERS.
Oh hey...you never did comment about this video. Palin NOT knowing what the First Amendment is for is about as brainless as YOU claiming a misdemeanor is not a crime.
McCain might have stood a chance if it wasn't for this twit...
and not knowing any Supreme Court cases outside of Roe V Wade (when asked to comment on anything BUT Roe V Wade) was also stupid (double stupid when you consider the stipulation)
@hipstermi Why would I comment on someone as stupid as ANYTHING and EVERYTHING TYT puts out? it's all intellectual sewage, dishonest, and hyper-partisan, with no interest in truth.
@hipstermi Palin doesn't understand the 1st Amendment? Only someone mindlessly stupid enough to listen to TYT would have such idiotic things to say. Palin not only understands it, but the pathetic attempts to spin this nonsense look only like little kids making grade school, pathetic, dishonest arguments.
"Why would I comment on someone as stupid as ANYTHING and EVERYTHING TYT puts out?"
and yet you came to a TYT thread...
your answer looks like another conservative coward dodge on your part again. you guys do that a lot...make these "dangerous" claims, then go into silent running when your lack of logic is exposed.
palin's own words shows she didnt know what the fuck the 1st Ammedment was for! Then again not know Supreme Court decisions is really stupid as well.
@hipstermi LOL, Palin is FANTASTICALLY smarter than you. After all, you listen ( and believe ) to TYT, which, basically makes you a mind numbed, brainless idiot. I can't imagine anyone falling for the imbecility spewed by the "show". Just having the sense to ignore them makes one 1000% smarter than you.
Hmmm...when asked to name a Supreme Court case outside Roe v Wade she didn't agree with...her answer was Roe v. Wade. not impressing me on the brightness there. this video she doesn't know the 1st amendment.
I can also name newspapers.
and she wanted deeply stupid creationism and science based evolution taught in schools.
Not all of it...but just listening to her speak and what she writes is another good indication. Hell even this video clip of her "reasoning" on the 1st Amed. is sad.
@hipstermi Now that you've finally decided to demonstrate your brilliance... I'm going quote Breitbarts ORIGINAL post on the Sherrod affair. "Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance." There you have it.
@hipstermi In addition to that, here's the ONLY thing Breitbart said about Sherrod, something Sherrod has repeatedly confirmed, and is soundly re-confirmed by the whole video: "... her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions." The audience throughout the video never repudiates that viewpoint, and in fact, applauds her self described racially motivated actions.
@hipstermi The Context for Sherrod: "For the past week, Americans who consider themselves aligned with the Tea Party movement have suffered the indignity of being falsely labeled racist by the NAACP and their pro-bono publicity managers, the main stream media. "
@hipstermi Which was followed by: "While the media has chosen to do the Democratic Party’s bidding in allowing for the NAACP to negatively and falsely brand the millions strong, loosely affiliated tea party phenomenon as “racist”, the moral indignation over race and racism has taken center stage in a summer of economic and political discontent." As you can see, his comments are ABOUT THE NAACP and it's violent racism, not any condemnation of Sherrod.
@hipstermi This false narrative was deliberate. For instance, trying to paint TEA Party protesters as "white militant racists", MSNBC published a picture of an armed guy at the TP rally. But they edited it. They cut the BLACK guy's head off the picture and photoshopped a WHITE guy onto it. After all, BLACK TP protesters don't paint a picture of a racist movement, so they edited the picture.
@hipstermi Further, the anti - TP astroturf movement decided to try to infiltrate the TP rallies with racist signs, and we know that some managed to get their pictures taken and the media published ONLY those pictures, even though some were taken far from the TP protests and rallies. Why? Liberals must lie. Truth will never work to advance the cause of modern liberalism. That's why you lie, and why TYT is nothing but hateful lies and propaganda.
@hipstermi The TP movement is NOT racist. Period. Your efforts to say otherwise are nothingbut but BIG FAT LIES by cowards unable to do anything but scream "racist" because their ideas, their thinking, their politics, are less than juvenile.
Yeah...despite Hannity showing two different weather patterns and seasons for a Tea rally. He had to fess up John Stewart owned his ass on this. Not to mention the amount of times Coulter, fatass Rush, O'Reiley, Beck, etc.
and Bush with his Weapons of Mass Destruction he swore were there.
Then how about this one- conservatives and their bullshit religion they try to pass off as fact or science?
@hipstermi Yes, as liberal, you continue to lie, and your "arguments" are nothing but brain dead stupid nonsense. You could not win a debate on the merits of liberalism vs conservatism against a 4 year old, you're THAT stupid.
@hipstermi BTW, what are you going to do when the Democrats lose Congress in a month, and the presidency in 2 years, and every wet dream fantasy you have of living off of others as a lazy leech go up in smoke? What are you going to do when America, given the choice of liberal wasteland, or going back to conservative principles, tosses your socialistic liberalism into the trash, rejects it for good and instead, starts adopting rational ideas and governance?
@65crewcabpw The politics and governance of "hipstermi" has been in place for about 70 years, and in that time, the arrogance of power has caused our government to destroy the currency, indebt the people 6 generations into the future, torn apart the elements that create a stable and strong society, and has brainwashed generation after generation that "liberalism" is true and right. And yet, reality has demonstrated it is absolute bankruptcy of both fact and intellect.
@hipstermi Let me explain to you WHY the TEA Party exists, and why Obama's going down, fast. This is a direct Obama quote: "If we were going to spend $700 billion, it seems it would be wiser having that $700 billion going to folks who would spend that money right away." Obama is speaking of expiring Bush tax cuts. In his view, NOT TAKING AWAY OUR MONEY is "spending" to Obama. This ludicrous, insane, outright pure insanity, is why YOU are losing.
@hipstermi "No, the tax cuts to the uber rich was less money generated for the economy." Even your pet rock is vastly smarter than you. That's one of the most amazingly stupid comments to ever be committed to cyberspace.
@hipstermi ONLY to someone who is arrogant and utterly disconnected from reality, is not confiscating the money of the people "spending" "we can't afford", in Washington DC. This arrogance of power is why the TEA Party has rightly rebelled against liberals, liberalism, and all the sheer insanity it has put in place, in terms of both governance and fiscal policy, and the sheer idiocy of "liberal" economics.
@hipstermi Now, let me address the intellectual bankruptcy of "hipstermi": According to Hipstermi's code of morality, good governance is measured by how much wealth is confiscated from those who have, and is distributed to those who did not earn it, according to political orthodoxy. In his or her insane philosophy, government has unlimited power to adjust your lifestyle and the outcome of your life.
@hipstermi Whoa, Hipstermi suddenly finding religion when someone proceeds to reveal Hipstermi's moral code to the world. Amazing. Odd, it was perfectly find to denigrate the morality of conservatives, libertarians, and make up all kinds of nonsense about them. Except that I'm right, and Hipstermi has lost the argument.
@hipstermi But conservatism, says that government turns corrupt and evil when it has the temptations of power over people, and so the only true and legitimate purpose of government is merely to defend the liberties and rights and property of the individual from anyone and all, and the interests of government are INFERIOR to that of the individual, so that government cannot have the power to inflict tyranny over anyone.
@hipstermi Liberals proudly proclaim that the Constitution empowers the government to do ANYTHING that "promotes the welfare" collectively, of the people, including impose lifestyle, wealth, intellectual, educational, speech, and any other limitations required by the wise government to preserve public order and welfare. Liberals disguise this as "your right to have other's wealth redistributed to you", as long as you are a politically favored "class".
@hipstermi This is how we could reach a point, where a President speaks of the part of your earnings you still keep as "spending" in Washington DC. According to Obama's own logic, what you keep is what Obama and Congress have SPENT upon you. All unworthy earnings will be redistributed to the politically favored, and that is never called "spending", it is referred to as "investment". YES, TYT are utterly intellectually bankrupt. And Hipstermi couldn't win a debate against a pet rock.
ANd yet here you are righting thesis length replies.
"Hipstermi couldn't win a debate against a pet rock"
If that was the case ou wouldn't be here debating. Not only that...I've made you look failry stupid.
Oh yeah...can you explain any logic in conservative bigotry opposing gay marriage? or citing "Christian nation" when you can't prove Christ even existed?
Believing in invisible beings with magical powers isnt very bright!
Lol young Cenk!
pojo485 1 month ago
@Jordanrichie100 How old are you? You can't debate because you don't have an answer so you go on about my mother? If you seemed to me like a trustworthy, sincere, adult person then maybe I would've been offended. Saved of that...
LiBlub1 2 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 Yeah well then shut the fuck up. You can't answer a question, you are defeated.
LiBlub1 2 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 what the fuck are u saying??? answer the dam question
Namelessman102 3 months ago
Sarah Palin is just one of many people who have NO FRIGGIN' IDEA what the Constitution and their amendments state. Ridiculous.
tregibbs 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 oh i almost forgot SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN!
Namelessman102 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 Yeah, you're just a strange creature. Almost like a suppressed homosexual.
truffyt 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 once again ur only comment is telling me to go away.thats half of ur comment making a stupid joke about my username, and you have yet to answer my first question. maybe u dont support her for president but u do support her. so before u right back PLEASE answer my first question of why do u hate him. AND then try to make a decent come back. =D
Namelessman102 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 actually ignore my other comment. after seeing your channel and reading other comments u posted. i realised ur no more than a sarah palin fan boy. u try making it sound as though ur smarter than others but really ur not. Ur just trying to show support for a stupid politician who of course you can easily relate to. So yea your sad. Say what ever you want back to me now cause it dosent matter. You support a person who dosent know the founding fathers. and she was running for pres
Namelessman102 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 wait i didnt look like an ass tho and u didnt answer anything. And honestly you make really stupid insults " come over to my house so i can shit down your skinny ass neck " wtf was that? THATS pathetic. My comments take like 20 sec to write and they are still better than your pieces of shit
Namelessman102 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 Ah, your answer defenitly shows everyone who comes to look at this video who of us is the smarter one, and who is the mong.
Besides, you still used the word "foreigner" as if it would be insulting. Not only that, but you were also wrong since he is an American, i.e. not a foreigner to you.
truffyt 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 You do know that your country is built completely by foreigners, right? Poor foreigners who couldn't find work or other means of supporting themselves at home, and traveled to America, just like for an example Mexicans, whom you hate. Unless you're an Indian, you can't really get away with calling someone else who lives in your country a foreigner as something negative and get away with it.
truffyt 3 months ago
@Jordanrichie100 the fucks with all the hate? u mad because all he said was true? and what the hell is up with your fucking comment dude you put way too much time writing it.
Namelessman102 3 months ago
To be fair, a lot of people don't understand the first ammendment.
INTPTT 4 months ago
Whoa, Cenk three years ago... he looks so young!
alphatotheomega7 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Once upon a time, the money that corporations made was invested back into the system in order to create industry, jobs etc. But those days are long gone. Corporations now hoard their money and no jobs are being created. The poor can't create jobs, therefore our salvation lies with the corporations. But they no longer wish to play the game. So I say we TAX THE F*****S HARD!!
If you agree, post this all over the web.
PercyCTV 6 months ago
The republicans don't understand any of the amendments.
syzygy502 6 months ago 2
@syzygy502 You know why? Because the constitution was written perfectly. It was a pack of whiny liberals who decided to change it and start adding amendments! Freedom of speech? More like freedom to be a traitor. Freedom of religion? More like freedom to spit in the face of God who created you. All amendments are anti-American, and you know it! That's why the GOP officially recognizes none of them. Not one! You bleeding heart liberals need to get out of our country and make your own.JK
skuzzkitty 5 months ago
@skuzzkitty All amendments are anti-American?? If slavery is American, then I am ashamed to be an American. But, I know that's not American, and I know we can make a change for the better if we vote OBAMA2012. You're right, the amendments were necessary and the GOP are idiots for not recognizing them. Read before you post please.
syzygy502 5 months ago
@skuzzkitty LOL. If slavery is American, then I am ashamed to be an American. Luckily, I know that idiots like you are rare. OBAMA2012.
syzygy502 5 months ago
@syzygy502 i don't want to make you feel bad or anything... but JK stands for just kidding. As in... i was being sarcastic, as in... tag, you're the idiot now. have a nice day!
skuzzkitty 5 months ago
@syzygy502 i don't want to make you feel bad or anything... but JK stands for just kidding. As in... i was being sarcastic, as in... tag, you're the idiot now. have a nice day!
skuzzkitty 5 months ago
@skuzzkitty Oh ok. I really didn't see the JK. That is my bad. The good news is that the republicans hate man dates almost as much as mandates.
syzygy502 5 months ago
@syzygy502 yeah, sorry about that. Ran out of space in my fake rant and had to squeeze it in.
skuzzkitty 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
why are the subtitles different from what he says and why do they have things like Butt instead of but on one the other videos it did that alot
TheBoom1234567890 7 months ago
To the ones who made the video: The title "Sarah Palin doesn't understand first amendment" is certainly wrong.
Understand this: Sarah Palin definitely doesn't understand anything, not only the first amendment, but anything.
This women has not a clue on what is going around whatever the content.
andyoupretendtoknow 7 months ago
PALIN FOR PRESIDENT.
With my neighbors parrot as Vp, she also talks without understanding.
The safest way of giving Obama 4 more years.
Matshoppahulle 7 months ago
I have a suggestion for all you Republicans that want to fix the budget. First we increase taxes on those earning 200 thousand dollars or more to 35%. Then we cap incomes at 50 million dollars a year. I mean who the hell needs more than 50 million dollars a year. It's not like you can take it with you when you die. If you have a problem with this just ask anyone in the middle class how they have felt having to foot the bill for so long and then have the benefits they paid into taken away!
BramSLI1 8 months ago
@BramSLI1 I don't necessarily like the cap of income, but they can't steal it from the middle-class taxpayer. They just need to be taxed more. Instead the republicans are trying to get rid of all taxes for the people who make more than a quarter-million dollars a year. All taxes under the Ryan plan would be eliminated or cut by more than 75%. Taxes for the middle-class person would be more than tripled to over 80%. The republicans are the real redistributors of wealth. They can make a projector.
syzygy502 7 months ago
Well, the constitution has never been really the strong point of the Republican party anyways.
hcnuup 8 months ago
for you people who are confused and dont understand this idiot palin she is just a plant. she was planted in power to cause as much chaos and mischief as possible. thats all nothing more. just like bachman and the rest of those idiots were planted to cause the destruction of society.
88DRocker1 8 months ago
Christians will ALWAYS get bashed, especially Christian women like Palin. She stands for God and Country, the foundation of this country and good values that our nation has gotten away from. Some people should understand that when a godly person has mission and passion for what is right and good to better mankind and doing the will of God....you CANNOT stop a person like that. "If God is for us, who can stand against us?" - Romans 8:31
christiancharlie 9 months ago
@christiancharlie dumbass
Alice9 8 months ago
@christiancharlie I am a christian woman and want Sarah as far away from government as possible. Just because you are christian doesnt make you prepared to lead a country.
mayhemtaken 8 months ago
@christiancharlie lol wow
metallicaholic43088 8 months ago
@christiancharlie No of course not, remember when Hitler came to power, "god is with us", almost nobody could stop this divine man.
Imhornydadcomeinside 8 months ago
@christiancharlie We're not bashing her cause she's a strong Christian. We're bashing her b/c she's an idiot. She can't name a founding forefather. She can't describe the Bush Doctrine, her idea of foreign policy is being able to see Russia from Alaska and I think if you ask her about her views on cap and trade she'd reply with the business model for Coke-a-Cola. Yikes!! I'm not religious but theres a vast amount of SMART Christians in Politics who are more qualified who are just as religious
nuggz503 8 months ago
@christiancharlie This has nothing to do with her religion. She is unfit to lead a girl scout troop let alone a nation of millions. She has neither the experience nor the fundamental knowledge one would expect a president or vice president to have.
Theroha 8 months ago
@christiancharlie I love that Palin's main defense is that she is Christian. She doesn't have to understand politics and know basic history because she is Christian. What does her faith have to do with her understanding basic facts? If your kid gets a wrong answer on a test do you accuse their teacher of victimizing them because they are Christian? It is absurd.
IWolfieI 7 months ago
But she understands a SHELLACKING - like the one you got in Nov 2010!
mgallant01 9 months ago
@mgallant01 we are got shellacked with all the dumbasses in office
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 8 months ago
Nice tie! lol
Dehax 9 months ago
it seams to me that the republican party is a bunch of inbred hill billy morons
candidomoreno666 10 months ago
And you guys dont understand the 2nd amendment, so what!
freedomfighter790 10 months ago
@freedomfighter790 Kind of funny that the Democrats are the ones who understand the Bill of Rights and the republicans don't understand any of the 10 amendments for it.
syzygy501 10 months ago
If I was 90 years old or if I was terminally ill I'd love to see Sarah Palin in power. I'd enjoy some really fucking hilarious last years of my life and go out with a boom (literally since she'd do something stupid enough to start a third world war or something). I know, I'm selfish but to be honest, humanity deserves a Sarah Palin now.
fablan6 10 months ago
@fablan6 These guys are really really great. I'm scuba diving all over YouTube to see if their logic applies to the second amendment as well. I mean really...why aren't these guys on television, and not on some third world 'net station?
butchblancq 10 months ago
Comment removed
fablan6 10 months ago
this woman should've been sterilized 20 years ago
only one kid out of four that isn't a disappointment
painlessissuicide 11 months ago
Go stick it Cenk!
Sarah Palin does understand the First Amendment!
The problem is that so many people are constantly abusing it, just like our freedom!
So many people fail to undersand that "FREEDOM IS NOT FREE"
BigWillieDude 11 months ago
@BigWillieDude You have been reported. You republicans are such hippocrites. If you truly think that freedom is not free, pay some taxes to help financing.
syzygy501 9 months ago
Summary - - -
Palin: "media, do you've f'ing job right"
Cenk: "No! that would impede my freedom of the press."
You're welcome. Cenk is a failure.
augustc4 11 months ago
cenk in a suit!!!!!!!
Thohon 11 months ago
Stupid liberals....lmao.............
TheKeetkeet66 11 months ago
Oh it's very simple. In spite of their almost pious braying about the constitution the righties only like the second amendment.
They don't give a shit about any of the others. They'd happily establish either Corporatocracy (Libertards) or a Theocracy (Consies) otherwise.
Shavarnarak 1 year ago
So never mind about the fallacious accusations of liberals.. just harp on Palin..lol
What is libel??????? u guys crack me up with your functional sub-literacy
carlindelco 1 year ago
Palin doesn't understand the constitution, let alone the amendments.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 1 year ago
Of course she hasn't read the first amendment, she is from Alaska.
flamingaxe791 1 year ago
liberals are fags
SCryder07 1 year ago
@SCryder07 Haha, how would you know? Did a liberal bend you over and stick it in your butt? Name calling is so childish what are you ten years old?
lilsolis 1 year ago
why cant intellegent women ever run for president?
kageroninja 1 year ago
@kageroninja cuiz they realize its the most retarded job ever and the bank owns the president. btw im 12 and
stupid. hehe. no disrespect intended.
but that is a good question...
cutiegirls4ever 1 year ago
@kageroninja
Hillary Clinton ran...
pwnrzero 11 months ago
Just in case Sarah ever comes by this video (which she won't):
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Kinjamaimai 1 year ago
@Kinjamaimai You never know. Her source of news is misquoting starbucks cups.
Her other news channel may be youtube.
balgus22 1 year ago
The victim mentality is so last season. Now, it's that she expects people to cater to her viewpoint and doesn't fully comprehend the essentials of our government's house and keeping. She can rebuff, claiming that society has lost its integrity, and she doesn't want cheap slander and defaming brought to an honest table.
returnoftheramble3 1 year ago
what's new?
theloveshineatheist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get you Asian wife lushfmlk.info
meshelbery 1 year ago
Comedians are gonna have a field day with this crazy b.
palimbec 1 year ago
holy crap.... does this guy not realize that point of the media is to report everything that people would want to hear?!?!?!? as of that point in time, most of the media was reporting bad about the right side (NOTHING good), and they wouldn't say a word about the left becuz they knew that Obama had given ppl hope and that reporting anything bad about him would make ppl hate the news station.
0657Gonere 1 year ago
I have a dilemma right now. I'm overjoyed that Palin's gone and that she really has no more possibility of being in power than a New York rat does.
At the same time, I'm clinically depressed because I saw an advertisement for a new reality series all about Sarah Palin's life.
Fuck. Didn't we hear enough of her stupidity when she was running? Now we have to pay her to say more stupid things?
I'm sad for humanity.
-IMP ;) :)
IceMetalPunk 1 year ago 53
@IceMetalPunk Right there with you!
auritone 1 year ago
@IceMetalPunk Don't be sad, sit back, cook some popcorn maybe smoke a bowl or two, and watch history being made..
Fuck them all.. The vast majority of the population are, and always have been sheep, members of a flock... Even with modern technology people ignore the truth and go with the crowd, not bothering to look into anything..
Back in the day the library was a key to education, now we have the internet available and people use it for what? Facebook.. Fucking Farmville, and music videos.
Martial024 1 year ago
@IceMetalPunk She's gone missing,except on every internet advertisment,every tv show,EVERY GOD DAMM POSTER.GOD DAMM US,WASN"T BUSH BAD ENOUGH?
mrpops123123 1 year ago
@IceMetalPunk If they do it as a comedy piece it could be quite entertaining. Kind of like Fox "news". The only problem is too many people will take it seriously. Kind of like Fox "news".
BramSLI1 7 months ago
change the title to "Sarah Palin Doesn't Understand ANYTHING"
3153dee 1 year ago 124
@3153dee I second that!
SSJ2UMRaijinGohan 1 year ago
@3153dee How about we change that to the motto of the Democratic Party? I think we'll win some more elections. Then we can force her out of her hole in Alaska and more people can see her for the slobbering simp she is. Oh man, I hope she doesn't read this. She might throw her poop at me and then jump up and down and call me sexist. And accuse me of wanting to kill her baby, almost forgot that one.
-Joe E Dangerously
xJoeEDangerouslyx 1 year ago
@3153dee Best comment ever. 3153dee for president :)
Bourgone22 1 year ago
@Bourgone22 :D!!
3153dee 1 year ago
Is that Creed Bratton?
TheMetalstorm22 1 year ago
Comment removed
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman ja, you too? i guess it would b easier to tal on facebook then to talkon some youtube site
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman me neither man
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman well, it's more in a grey area. hard drugs are illegal, but people still use it, so our government thought it would be best to make the use of the drugs safer...
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman i agree, but you can't stop the ones that still want to do it; at least they use it relatively safe
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman lol haha
and guess what? hough we have legalized soft drugs, and we even have methods to give people a safe use of harddrugs, the only country's that have lower drugsabuse rates are in scandinavia, like sweden...so, that's cool
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman nope, a town in the eastern part of the country...
and the coffeeshops in the netherlands are famous because you can buy a really small amount of legalized drugs in there...most of them are in amsterdam
Gorattin 1 year ago
i love how stupid she is. if she did become VP its a good thing that VPs dont really do much and have much power in all reality. their basically the presidents lacky. their most important job is to go to other countries for meeting/press bullshit that the president doesnt give enough shits to go to... thats a direct quote from the govermnent teacher lol
Dyeballer610 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman haha XD and i always thought the tourists only looked in the red light district and the coffeeshops
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman because, believe it or not, even in europe we have idiots
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman yeah, the canal's; ou shouldn't go swim in them; many people use them to dump their bike's
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman yeah, i know, my family likes to visit the nearest camping side...so boring
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman and denmark...man, if you walk around there, you just understand why it's the most happy place on earth
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman europe rules man, we don't have nutbags like sarah palin or mccain or those damn republicans...and København is a beautiful city
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman dude, i was just playing with you, man, i'm from the netherlands, i don't give a crap about who's the next president...
but you're right, she's soooooooooooo dumb
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman i guess more smart than you too...(here????)
Gorattin 1 year ago
@mrjohantheman
>is more smart then here
>more smart then here
>then here
ThaCoreythaOne 1 year ago
What she is talking about is the unqualified use of lies. The attacks on conservitives is used all the time without a counter attack, but if anyone calls the liberal bluff they go crazy. If no one can see this, then they are being self decieved.
This is the same tactic used by the Muslims. They can call a Christian anything they want, and get no backlash. But let anyone say anything about Muslims and all HELL breaks loose. So get a life and start telling the TRUTH.
dcc10n 1 year ago
@dcc10n
"What she is talking about is the unqualified use of lies"
You mean like claiming "death panels" that no one can point me to are in the HC plan?
"The attacks on conservitives"
You really think conservatives are such "victims"? Hannity, Rush, Beck, etc have made a career on attacks/lies. Then we can go though: birthers, claims of being a Muslim, a Nazi, etc.
Really dude, conservatives aren't these innocent little lambs you paint them out to be.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Do you bet your honor that there are no boards, individuals, panels, committees or agencies in Obamacare, who have the power to deny you or anyone else any care, treatment, procedure, technology, medicine, drug, or other need?
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Do you bet your honor that there are no boards, individuals"
You are repeating a question I told you I WOULD answer ... when you answered MY question I asked first. I already told you about your child like posts about repeating things. So instead of my reply...just go back 7-9 pages and read what I wrote then, asshole.
Proving once again you are afraid to answer my questions and like a child just repeat things.
again...i said I WOULD answer this if you answered mine first.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Do you bet your honor that there are no boards, panels, committees, agencies, secretaries, directors, or other bodies created by Obamacare, which have the power to limit your choices, withold treatment, medicines, drugs, procedures, technologies, or other things concerning your health care? Either you lie to yourself, pretending to believe falsehood, or you just lie to everyone else, wanting them to believe untruth. Which is it?
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Do you bet your honor"
Like a child, you just pout and repeat things until you get your way.
Weren't you just crying about me making "demands" in the last post?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"ither you lie to yourself, pretending to believe falsehood, or you just lie to everyone else, wanting them to believe untruth. Which is it?"
That's a conservative lie on your part again.
Conservatives often aren't to bright, so they don't know their plows are obvious. You repeat yourself like a child as noted...but you frame your conservative lie question with only 2 possible outcomes as quoted. You conservative lie by implying these are the only 2.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi There ARE only two possible answers, you idiot. Are there boards, panels, committees, commissions, secretaries, or any other bodies which have the power to prevent, refuse, control, limit, or otherwise in any way control availability to treatment, technology, medicines, drugs, procedures, or any other facet of health care? The question has ONLY two possible answers. "Yes" or "No". No dissembling on your part about semantics is valid, it's just more untruth and dishonesty.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"The question has ONLY two possible answers"
That's not what you said before.
YOU claimed there are "two possibilities"
a. the "panels" (yet when I ask you to show me where in the bill you conservative coward shut up)
or
b.. I was "lying" if I said I didn't believe "a"
Leaving out that your claims are false or that people don't believe them.
Propaganda Inst., cataloged this in the 30s...they called it "Glittering generalities" it involves a dishonesty on your part.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi LOL, that's right, there are only TWO possible choices... A the panels exist, or B, you're a liar. You see, there is no other choice. There is the truth, and there are people who tell lies. The truth is, they exist, and there is no means of disputing it, it is FACT. Just as gravity is fact. Anything else, is just a lie.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"A the panels exist, or B, you're a liar. You see, there is no other choice."
Wrong asshole: C. they don't exist
I didn't "lie" about anything...I don't believe you or that idiot Palin.
You fucking idiot...you can't grasp that you and I don't agree on this?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"s right, there are only TWO possible choices... A the panels exist, or B, you're a liar."
you just changed your story again... another conservative lie.
your "only two answers" were different before... "he question has ONLY two possible answers. "Yes" or "No"."
caught your conservative lie...
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"A the panels exist, or B, you're a liar."
OK asshole, HC is here. A year from now when there are no "death panels" will you admit to being wrong? or being stupid enough to believe Palin?
This is just like when you claimed a misdemeanor is not a crime. I was right, you were wrong, and you just clammed up. you looked so fucking stupid over that one....your "silent running" betrayed your conservative cowardice.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Uhhh... Ok, you're finally taking a stand. Well, congratulations on being a brain dead idiot. Of course there are "death panels". In fact, there are over a dozen entities created within Obamacare that have the power to take your health care choices away from you and your doctor and make them by unelected beaurocrats. The FDA has already started the process of deciding which drugs and medicines to de-certify on the basis of "cost".
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Uhhh... Ok, you're finally taking a stand. Well, congratulations on being a brain dead idiot"
Brain dead?
I'm not conservative nor a Christian.
You got to admit...answering everything with "Jesus!" and basing laws on that...
is fairly intellectually lazy and ass stupid.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
" fact, there are over a dozen entities created within Obamacare that have the power to take your health care choices away from you and your doctor and make them by unelected beaurocrats"
Can you specifically name a few of them? and a vague section...give me specifics.
When I go to the conservative pages, the things they claim are this...really aren't.
You know if you call a tomato an onion that doesn't make it so either.
but go ahead...list these "dozens"
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"power to take your health care choices away from you"
you are confused...the take choices away already exist. PPOs give limited choice. The "pre existing conditions"...screw over for stuff you were born with limits choice and coverage.
I have a friend down to one kidney and your conservative loved system has him paying out of pocket due to his pre existing conditions. someone like him nable to make the cash...i wonder why you guys didnt cry "death panels" years earlier?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi No, YOU are confused. Something not being covered by insurance (a contract between you and a company) in no way limits your choices. If you choose a PPO, that's your tough luck and you'll have to pay outside of it for whatever you want. When government limits it, YOU HAVE NO OPTION. Duhhhh. As usual, your responses are as stupid as one can possibly be.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Something not being covered by insurance (a contract between you and a company) in no way limits your choices"
People are DENIED coverage. How is that not "limit"? People have died due to this... you know, what you guys claim the HC bill will have happen with "death panels"?
"If you choose a PPO, that's your tough luck "
Some employers don't give you a lot of "choice" in the matter.
hipstermi 1 year ago
Comment removed
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"When government limits it, YOU HAVE NO OPTION"
You really didnt address the points-
1. what "options" do people with "pre existing conditions" who can't get coverage have in the old failed system? People were turned down for coverage and many died.
2. since insurance companies made the call on who was covered or had pre existings...how was that different than a "death panel"
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Insurance denying "coverage" is not "denying treatment". I told you Hipstermi can't win a debate with a pet rock.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi Why must people's choices be limited to that which government, in its infinite stupidity, thinks it has the power to enforce? Or, why should health care be linked to EITHER insurance OR employment? It should not be, anymore than cars or food. It should be nothing other than a service you choose to use, and health insurance be a financial protection from catastrophic losses - you know, like any other insurance.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"i LOL, that's right, there are only TWO possible choices... A the panels exist, or B, you're a liar. You see, there is no other choice."
That's just deception on your part. For me to "lie" I would have to "know" "panels" exist. That's not true.
Your deception "forgot" to mention C. no panels exist, it's conspiracy theory
You will be proven wrong again, same as when I kicked your stupid ass over the debate of crimes being misdemeanor.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi First, either you're know panels exist, or, you're the most ignorant idiot to walk the face of the earth. And, since you're claiming to be able to debate the topic, you've declared yourself knowledgeable. Thus, to say 'no they don't" is a lie. Flat out a lie. It's like standing on the street at noon and saying "the sun stopped shining". Nobody takes you seriously, because no matter how you argue, reality has not changed.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@65crewcabpw
"And, since you're claiming to be able to debate the topic, you've declared yourself knowledgeable. Thus, to say 'no they don't" is a lie"
Odd...you were unable or unwilling to provide a direct quote to prove your claim.
and no a "consultation" doesn't "prove" a death panel. you conservative lied about it all for your political agenda...or you just gave in to the usual conservative fear factor tricks.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Nobody takes you seriously, because no matter how you argue, reality has not changed"
Yet you keep having these meltdowns and replying all the time.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi I will NEVER "obey" your demands. You do not command me. Your inferior understanding of reality has failed to teach you the essential message... That reality triumphs over liberal fantasy EVERY time.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@65crewcabpw
"I will NEVER "obey" your demands"
I didn't "demand" anything. This is a conservative lie on your part.
"Your inferior understanding of reality"
uhhh...conservatives base government policy on - snicker- jeebuz and his magical powers ! That's sooOOoo rational.
"That reality triumphs over liberal fantasy"
fantasy? see above...
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"That reality triumphs over liberal fantasy"
"fantasy" ? we have conservative assholes tell us Obama is "like Hitler" when no one has been killed. In this fantasy, conservatives ignore Germany' conservative/Christian roots...but think they are fighting "bad guys" like WW2. (despite Bush family business dealings with Nazis...)
Then you have the conservatives who think it's part of the "anti Christ". Again...fantasy of invisible beings with MAGICAL POWERS.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
Please comment on you being WRONG about MISDEMEANORS "not being crimes".
hipstermi 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
Oh hey...you never did comment about this video. Palin NOT knowing what the First Amendment is for is about as brainless as YOU claiming a misdemeanor is not a crime.
McCain might have stood a chance if it wasn't for this twit...
and not knowing any Supreme Court cases outside of Roe V Wade (when asked to comment on anything BUT Roe V Wade) was also stupid (double stupid when you consider the stipulation)
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Why would I comment on someone as stupid as ANYTHING and EVERYTHING TYT puts out? it's all intellectual sewage, dishonest, and hyper-partisan, with no interest in truth.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@65crewcabpw
"Why would I comment on someone as stupid as ANYTHING and EVERYTHING TYT puts out?"
So...why didn't you comment about YOU not knowing a misdemeanor is not a crime? Made you look really stupid.
hipstermi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@65crewcabpw
"Why would I comment on someone as stupid as ANYTHING and EVERYTHING TYT puts out?"
and despite the outrage here you are commenting in their boxes.... so your silence proves the point- Palin DID NOT know about the First Amendment!
and YOU were just as stupid...claiming a misdemeanor is not a crime! Duhhh.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Palin doesn't understand the 1st Amendment? Only someone mindlessly stupid enough to listen to TYT would have such idiotic things to say. Palin not only understands it, but the pathetic attempts to spin this nonsense look only like little kids making grade school, pathetic, dishonest arguments.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Why would I comment on someone as stupid as ANYTHING and EVERYTHING TYT puts out?"
and yet you came to a TYT thread...
your answer looks like another conservative coward dodge on your part again. you guys do that a lot...make these "dangerous" claims, then go into silent running when your lack of logic is exposed.
palin's own words shows she didnt know what the fuck the 1st Ammedment was for! Then again not know Supreme Court decisions is really stupid as well.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi LOL, Palin is FANTASTICALLY smarter than you. After all, you listen ( and believe ) to TYT, which, basically makes you a mind numbed, brainless idiot. I can't imagine anyone falling for the imbecility spewed by the "show". Just having the sense to ignore them makes one 1000% smarter than you.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Palin is FANTASTICALLY smarter than you. "
Hmmm...when asked to name a Supreme Court case outside Roe v Wade she didn't agree with...her answer was Roe v. Wade. not impressing me on the brightness there. this video she doesn't know the 1st amendment.
I can also name newspapers.
and she wanted deeply stupid creationism and science based evolution taught in schools.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi That's your "evidence" that Palin is "dumb"? My God, do you have any idea now astonishingly stupid YOU are?
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@65crewcabpw
"That's your "evidence" that Palin is "dumb"?
Not all of it...but just listening to her speak and what she writes is another good indication. Hell even this video clip of her "reasoning" on the 1st Amed. is sad.
What evidence do you have she is smart?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Now that you've finally decided to demonstrate your brilliance... I'm going quote Breitbarts ORIGINAL post on the Sherrod affair. "Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance." There you have it.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi In addition to that, here's the ONLY thing Breitbart said about Sherrod, something Sherrod has repeatedly confirmed, and is soundly re-confirmed by the whole video: "... her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions." The audience throughout the video never repudiates that viewpoint, and in fact, applauds her self described racially motivated actions.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi The Context for Sherrod: "For the past week, Americans who consider themselves aligned with the Tea Party movement have suffered the indignity of being falsely labeled racist by the NAACP and their pro-bono publicity managers, the main stream media. "
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi Which was followed by: "While the media has chosen to do the Democratic Party’s bidding in allowing for the NAACP to negatively and falsely brand the millions strong, loosely affiliated tea party phenomenon as “racist”, the moral indignation over race and racism has taken center stage in a summer of economic and political discontent." As you can see, his comments are ABOUT THE NAACP and it's violent racism, not any condemnation of Sherrod.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi This false narrative was deliberate. For instance, trying to paint TEA Party protesters as "white militant racists", MSNBC published a picture of an armed guy at the TP rally. But they edited it. They cut the BLACK guy's head off the picture and photoshopped a WHITE guy onto it. After all, BLACK TP protesters don't paint a picture of a racist movement, so they edited the picture.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi Further, the anti - TP astroturf movement decided to try to infiltrate the TP rallies with racist signs, and we know that some managed to get their pictures taken and the media published ONLY those pictures, even though some were taken far from the TP protests and rallies. Why? Liberals must lie. Truth will never work to advance the cause of modern liberalism. That's why you lie, and why TYT is nothing but hateful lies and propaganda.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"TP astroturf movement decided to try to infiltrate the TP rallies with racist signs, "
Oh right...there are no racists in the Tea Party despite all the southern guys.
Dale Roberstons of TeaParty DOT org had the famous "niggar" sign. This was bad due to:
1. it was featured on their web site
2. it was hown on the web doctored ("I work 4 you)
3. a conservative so dumb he misspelled the n-word.
but no...to you it's all the evil liberals who infiltrate this event.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi The TP movement is NOT racist. Period. Your efforts to say otherwise are nothingbut but BIG FAT LIES by cowards unable to do anything but scream "racist" because their ideas, their thinking, their politics, are less than juvenile.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Liberals must lie"
Yeah...despite Hannity showing two different weather patterns and seasons for a Tea rally. He had to fess up John Stewart owned his ass on this. Not to mention the amount of times Coulter, fatass Rush, O'Reiley, Beck, etc.
and Bush with his Weapons of Mass Destruction he swore were there.
Then how about this one- conservatives and their bullshit religion they try to pass off as fact or science?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Yes, as liberal, you continue to lie, and your "arguments" are nothing but brain dead stupid nonsense. You could not win a debate on the merits of liberalism vs conservatism against a 4 year old, you're THAT stupid.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi BTW, what are you going to do when the Democrats lose Congress in a month, and the presidency in 2 years, and every wet dream fantasy you have of living off of others as a lazy leech go up in smoke? What are you going to do when America, given the choice of liberal wasteland, or going back to conservative principles, tosses your socialistic liberalism into the trash, rejects it for good and instead, starts adopting rational ideas and governance?
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw The politics and governance of "hipstermi" has been in place for about 70 years, and in that time, the arrogance of power has caused our government to destroy the currency, indebt the people 6 generations into the future, torn apart the elements that create a stable and strong society, and has brainwashed generation after generation that "liberalism" is true and right. And yet, reality has demonstrated it is absolute bankruptcy of both fact and intellect.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi Let me explain to you WHY the TEA Party exists, and why Obama's going down, fast. This is a direct Obama quote: "If we were going to spend $700 billion, it seems it would be wiser having that $700 billion going to folks who would spend that money right away." Obama is speaking of expiring Bush tax cuts. In his view, NOT TAKING AWAY OUR MONEY is "spending" to Obama. This ludicrous, insane, outright pure insanity, is why YOU are losing.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"Obama is speaking of expiring Bush tax cuts. In his view, NOT TAKING AWAY OUR MONEY is "spending" to Obama"
No, the tax cuts to the uber rich was less money generated for the economy.
So why do the rich, aka guys who don't need it, get more of a tax cut than middle class people?
and why are they bitching about this number, which is a lot less than under Ike and about equal to Reagan era?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi "No, the tax cuts to the uber rich was less money generated for the economy." Even your pet rock is vastly smarter than you. That's one of the most amazingly stupid comments to ever be committed to cyberspace.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi ONLY to someone who is arrogant and utterly disconnected from reality, is not confiscating the money of the people "spending" "we can't afford", in Washington DC. This arrogance of power is why the TEA Party has rightly rebelled against liberals, liberalism, and all the sheer insanity it has put in place, in terms of both governance and fiscal policy, and the sheer idiocy of "liberal" economics.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi Now, let me address the intellectual bankruptcy of "hipstermi": According to Hipstermi's code of morality, good governance is measured by how much wealth is confiscated from those who have, and is distributed to those who did not earn it, according to political orthodoxy. In his or her insane philosophy, government has unlimited power to adjust your lifestyle and the outcome of your life.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@65crewcabpw
"According to Hipstermi's code of morality, good governance is measured by how much wealth is confiscated from those who have"
that's a conservative lie...I never said that. I challenge you to find a quote. Not what you think I said or "interpreted" but a quote.
You lied...aka sinned. Not very "Christ"ian of you.
You conservatives do this a lot in debates...you make up stuff on what other people aid or believe.
Show me a quote, bitch.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Whoa, Hipstermi suddenly finding religion when someone proceeds to reveal Hipstermi's moral code to the world. Amazing. Odd, it was perfectly find to denigrate the morality of conservatives, libertarians, and make up all kinds of nonsense about them. Except that I'm right, and Hipstermi has lost the argument.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi But conservatism, says that government turns corrupt and evil when it has the temptations of power over people, and so the only true and legitimate purpose of government is merely to defend the liberties and rights and property of the individual from anyone and all, and the interests of government are INFERIOR to that of the individual, so that government cannot have the power to inflict tyranny over anyone.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi Liberals proudly proclaim that the Constitution empowers the government to do ANYTHING that "promotes the welfare" collectively, of the people, including impose lifestyle, wealth, intellectual, educational, speech, and any other limitations required by the wise government to preserve public order and welfare. Liberals disguise this as "your right to have other's wealth redistributed to you", as long as you are a politically favored "class".
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
@hipstermi This is how we could reach a point, where a President speaks of the part of your earnings you still keep as "spending" in Washington DC. According to Obama's own logic, what you keep is what Obama and Congress have SPENT upon you. All unworthy earnings will be redistributed to the politically favored, and that is never called "spending", it is referred to as "investment". YES, TYT are utterly intellectually bankrupt. And Hipstermi couldn't win a debate against a pet rock.
65crewcabpw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@65crewcabpw
"YES, TYT are utterly intellectually bankrupt"
ANd yet here you are righting thesis length replies.
"Hipstermi couldn't win a debate against a pet rock"
If that was the case ou wouldn't be here debating. Not only that...I've made you look failry stupid.
Oh yeah...can you explain any logic in conservative bigotry opposing gay marriage? or citing "Christian nation" when you can't prove Christ even existed?
Believing in invisible beings with magical powers isnt very bright!
hipstermi 1 year ago