I'm surprised you hated the Blood Seeker over an Explorer's Scope. With Obsidian Fireheart, Molten Ravager and Spire Barrage you might have ended up playing it.
I thought Zektar Shrine and Molten Ravagers are better. They're damage sources that don't get stopped very often. Also, I think Zektars get better with multiples.
I also thought a 3rd Boar was better than another Shortcutter, despite curve issues. Especially when other people aren't playing Red. It could replace a Shatterskull if necessary.
I feel that the key to aggro is unstoppable, continous damage, even if the curve isn't extremely low.
The shrine is a horrible top deck in this particular deck. The ravagers also take up a lot of mana that he'll be needing to pay for all those 4 drops. At the time he took the shortcutter over the boar he had practically no 2 drops so that pick speaks for itself. This is a very fast format and games will end quickly if you rely too much on higher drops and don't set up in the early turns.
I thought you always tried to play 17 land in draft (with card selection ranging it up or down 1 of course). Now your saying you always try to play 18? :/ Is that just for zendikar or have you changed your mind about the right land count for draft?
Someone gets a nice black deck there :D
Nezuumi 1 year ago
I really wish I was in black this draft. nighthawk, 2x disfigures, 2x hideous, gul-draz., kalitas
Krimzj 1 year ago
you just had to add the nowhere joke didn't you?!
UnholyBurgerr 2 years ago 2
I'm surprised you hated the Blood Seeker over an Explorer's Scope. With Obsidian Fireheart, Molten Ravager and Spire Barrage you might have ended up playing it.
Spectator21 2 years ago
These videos are very helpful and you do a great job :D
I agree with the poster below, though. I think a link at the end of each video would really help navigating the channel.
Keep up the good work!
FritztheCat198 2 years ago
i love these videos but having a link to the next video at the end would be so so so helpful
Dothackfreak11 2 years ago
why not playing the crossroads instead of one of those plains?
PonderousAnomaly 2 years ago
the deck really wants to curve out if possible, so a CIPT land isn't that great.
cruciald 2 years ago 4
I thought Zektar Shrine and Molten Ravagers are better. They're damage sources that don't get stopped very often. Also, I think Zektars get better with multiples.
I also thought a 3rd Boar was better than another Shortcutter, despite curve issues. Especially when other people aren't playing Red. It could replace a Shatterskull if necessary.
I feel that the key to aggro is unstoppable, continous damage, even if the curve isn't extremely low.
aaaaaaaaooooooo 2 years ago
The shrine is a horrible top deck in this particular deck. The ravagers also take up a lot of mana that he'll be needing to pay for all those 4 drops. At the time he took the shortcutter over the boar he had practically no 2 drops so that pick speaks for itself. This is a very fast format and games will end quickly if you rely too much on higher drops and don't set up in the early turns.
Stevers80 2 years ago
I thought you always tried to play 17 land in draft (with card selection ranging it up or down 1 of course). Now your saying you always try to play 18? :/ Is that just for zendikar or have you changed your mind about the right land count for draft?
madfrog1 2 years ago
It's mostly for Zendikar, you want to have 18 lands for most decks to ensure you keep hitting your landfall triggers.
PhantasyHero22 2 years ago
Just for Zendikar, with all the landfall in the set, you want to hit land drops to activate the geopede and the shrine...
xFraseRxRx 2 years ago
Depends on your landfall triggers...drawing a land in certain situations can be more beneficial late game if it creates lots of effects.
jgioeli0 2 years ago
your puns... lol
neutronflare47 2 years ago 5