at 2:17 i just wanted to say i know what kind of missile that is... It's a maverick AGM-65. reason i am pointing this out is those missiles are not small. stood up right nearly as tall as a grown man. those those rounds bursting look extremely powerful
It's a 35mm round my mistake. The skyshield doesn't have to use both guns to shoot a object down. It's a CIWS like the goalkeeper or phalanx. There's also a navy version like the skyshield the oerlikon millenium 35. I also think it holds more ammo but iam not sure. The navy version has 250 airburst rounds. And the controle system can handle 3 guns or 2 guns with one short range missile launcher.
It seems really good at shooting non-moving targets. The age of gun based AAA is over when a bunch of cheap IR rockets can do the same job at greater range.
SAR SAMs are used more commonly for shooting down aircraft with decoy dispensers than IR. Cruise missiles don't have them which is what SkyShield is really meant to defeat. IR rockets can handle that just fine, even USN thinks so with SeaRAM and France with Mistral.
@stalkingalizee IR is defeated with flares and chaff this system uses IR/Radar and visual aids to detect and defeat the target. If it can take an incoming missile or Laser Guided Bomb from reaching the target it well pays for it self.
@hubergeek IR isn't defeated by chaff at all. Bombs and missiles do not carry flares. AAA has proven ineffective which is why Skyshield has added a SAM module.
@stalkingalizee My bad I meant to say Chaff and Flares can fool missiles but this system is equipped with IR Radar and Visual sensors, it would be very difficult to defeat such a weapon.
@hubergeek But at what cost? Skyshield costs $20 million per battery, of which only contains two guns. With limited range and only engaging one target at a time, a simple barrage attack would take it out. You can buy a MICA VL battery with 4X the range and engage 16 targets at once in 360 degrees.
@stalkingalizee You need more then just a missile system to protect the air and troops. Long range, medium range and short range air defense systems are necessary. The skyshield isn't used for destroying airplanes but mortars and artillery shells. You say that it isn't cheap, the system isn't but bullets are. With a missile defense system the battery is cheap (launcher,...) but the rockets aren't. Taking a mortar down with a 800.000€ missile isn't cheap and very difficult.
@stalkingalizee This is a very good system to counter attack small enemy projectiles. Also the radar is made for tracking small and fast objects. I know what you mean this system alone isnt good but with other systems it is. Aster 30 block 1 - 120km, Aster 30 block 2 +120km - ? = ballistic missiles,fighterjets,... NG crotale 15 km = cruise missiles,heli, UCAV's,... and the skyshield 4600m UAV's, mortars, artillery shells. that all together and you will have a VERY good anti air system. ;-)
Aster 30 covers the range from long, medium to SHORAD. The only thing it doesn't do is point defence. Skyshield is point defence, and limited at its engagement only engaging one target at a time.
@stalkingalizee You cant compare the Aster 30 to the skyshield. It's like comparing a assault rifle with a tank !? The Aster 30 is a missile system and the skyshield with 30mm rounds. The skyshield is used for protection against smaller threats like mortars,small UAV,105-155mm shells. You cant use the skyshield for long range air defense system and nobody does. And the SAMP-T is a shorad,medium,longe range air defense system using aster15 and aster30.
@stalkingalizee The skyshield and the SAMP T or not designed for the same task. The military bases has to be protected against all threats. Threats from the air and threats from the ground. Skyshield is made for the last one SAMP T for the first one. Aster 30 covers a large range but cant take out small threats like mortars it's more for larger objects. And also taking out a 600€ mortar fired from 8km away with a 800.000€ missile and a 120km range!?
@stalkingalizee The skyshield radar unit can detect and track alot. The gun can only destroy 1 target at the time but it's very fast. When there should be a mortar attack and they shoot 30 mortars after eachother then the skyshiels would have no problem with that 2x15. But the Aster30 will 1 the objects are to small, 2 Aster30 has 3x8 launchers= 24, 3 it can only fire 16 missiles in a short time because the aster also works with 1 radar unit and 4 the high cost.
Dear santa i ull screw this time ill kick ur ass!!!
SuperAaaaa123456 3 months ago
is it available to general public? if so.. what price..
almightyseeker 3 months ago
Great I need one because every December a big fat guy with 12 raindeer lands on my roof. LOL
therichardking4242 3 months ago
Hail to the Military-Industrial-Complex!
nash0815 3 months ago
at 2:17 i just wanted to say i know what kind of missile that is... It's a maverick AGM-65. reason i am pointing this out is those missiles are not small. stood up right nearly as tall as a grown man. those those rounds bursting look extremely powerful
OzzyTripping 5 months ago
india SHould buy some of those
tonymultani 6 months ago
german engineering.
schablone35 6 months ago
I will take two. Pesky assed hawks keep getting my chickens
supressorgrid 6 months ago
is there fries with that...
eftrichard 7 months ago
Huh, so... Rheinmetall bought Oerlikon
Rammsteinchile95 7 months ago
BIG POWER ... any anti missile whatever his model
fabriciobrisola1 8 months ago
Isn't Metal Storm better?
r1raceguy 8 months ago
@r1raceguy not practical.. too expensive... hard to operate and not made for flaking planes
xraidedlok 6 months ago
rheinmetall defence systems are the best ! GERMAN POWER ! :)
dennis654321 9 months ago 2
Looks like an advertisement for fast moving consumer goods. -:)
harishkumar09 9 months ago
Damn the Libyans could use this
ND7652 9 months ago
But will it blend?
zalimoon 9 months ago 11
looks like the Germans use Americans as attackers
tHeWasTeDYouTh 10 months ago
@tHeWasTeDYouTh
Ehhhmm... no... ehhmmm... These are supposed to be ...ehhh....... Russians ...and Taliban ....YES ..Russians drones ..and ehhhmm ...Taliban cruise missiles ....
Nothing to see here ... move along :-D
Celeon999A 9 months ago
@Celeon999A lol nah Germany is cutting its military so they are done for if the Poles go after them for some payback
tHeWasTeDYouTh 9 months ago
@tHeWasTeDYouTh Poles what?Germany can defeat Poland using its police force,it don't need the Wehrmacht,,,ooops I meant the Bundeswehr,sorry.
alboclev 7 months ago
but will it keep them kids off my lawn ?? :D
pyrodownhiller 11 months ago 25
@pyrodownhiller Wrong question.... Zalimoon has the right one. :P
stefan90kauw 1 month ago
damn impressive
kumquatsta 1 year ago
Let's put those things on Afghan hilltop FOB's !
highwayhazzard 1 year ago
It's a 35mm round my mistake. The skyshield doesn't have to use both guns to shoot a object down. It's a CIWS like the goalkeeper or phalanx. There's also a navy version like the skyshield the oerlikon millenium 35. I also think it holds more ammo but iam not sure. The navy version has 250 airburst rounds. And the controle system can handle 3 guns or 2 guns with one short range missile launcher.
glendelio 1 year ago
Awesome !!!
hubergeek 1 year ago
shit --TUNGUSKA & SHILKA POWER
Natali88333 1 year ago
looks nice huh?
Kuderer 1 year ago
It seems really good at shooting non-moving targets. The age of gun based AAA is over when a bunch of cheap IR rockets can do the same job at greater range.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee ir rockets can lose targets can be chaft can be ecm´d to this to a bullet.
you cant use flare chaff or ecm ones the bullet is out of the gun its over.
TheWurscht 1 year ago
SAR SAMs are used more commonly for shooting down aircraft with decoy dispensers than IR. Cruise missiles don't have them which is what SkyShield is really meant to defeat. IR rockets can handle that just fine, even USN thinks so with SeaRAM and France with Mistral.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee IR is defeated with flares and chaff this system uses IR/Radar and visual aids to detect and defeat the target. If it can take an incoming missile or Laser Guided Bomb from reaching the target it well pays for it self.
hubergeek 1 year ago
@hubergeek IR isn't defeated by chaff at all. Bombs and missiles do not carry flares. AAA has proven ineffective which is why Skyshield has added a SAM module.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee My bad I meant to say Chaff and Flares can fool missiles but this system is equipped with IR Radar and Visual sensors, it would be very difficult to defeat such a weapon.
hubergeek 1 year ago
@hubergeek But at what cost? Skyshield costs $20 million per battery, of which only contains two guns. With limited range and only engaging one target at a time, a simple barrage attack would take it out. You can buy a MICA VL battery with 4X the range and engage 16 targets at once in 360 degrees.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee You need more then just a missile system to protect the air and troops. Long range, medium range and short range air defense systems are necessary. The skyshield isn't used for destroying airplanes but mortars and artillery shells. You say that it isn't cheap, the system isn't but bullets are. With a missile defense system the battery is cheap (launcher,...) but the rockets aren't. Taking a mortar down with a 800.000€ missile isn't cheap and very difficult.
glendelio 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee This is a very good system to counter attack small enemy projectiles. Also the radar is made for tracking small and fast objects. I know what you mean this system alone isnt good but with other systems it is. Aster 30 block 1 - 120km, Aster 30 block 2 +120km - ? = ballistic missiles,fighterjets,... NG crotale 15 km = cruise missiles,heli, UCAV's,... and the skyshield 4600m UAV's, mortars, artillery shells. that all together and you will have a VERY good anti air system. ;-)
glendelio 1 year ago
@glendelio
Aster 30 covers the range from long, medium to SHORAD. The only thing it doesn't do is point defence. Skyshield is point defence, and limited at its engagement only engaging one target at a time.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee You cant compare the Aster 30 to the skyshield. It's like comparing a assault rifle with a tank !? The Aster 30 is a missile system and the skyshield with 30mm rounds. The skyshield is used for protection against smaller threats like mortars,small UAV,105-155mm shells. You cant use the skyshield for long range air defense system and nobody does. And the SAMP-T is a shorad,medium,longe range air defense system using aster15 and aster30.
glendelio 1 year ago
@glendelio
I obviously didn't compare it to skyshield, I said SS was point defence.... duh
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee The skyshield and the SAMP T or not designed for the same task. The military bases has to be protected against all threats. Threats from the air and threats from the ground. Skyshield is made for the last one SAMP T for the first one. Aster 30 covers a large range but cant take out small threats like mortars it's more for larger objects. And also taking out a 600€ mortar fired from 8km away with a 800.000€ missile and a 120km range!?
glendelio 1 year ago
@glendelio
I already said they are not the same task... r u dense?
Skyshield only has 20 rounds worth of bursts and it takes both guns on the target. Stopping a mortar attack by this system won't happen.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@stalkingalizee The skyshield radar unit can detect and track alot. The gun can only destroy 1 target at the time but it's very fast. When there should be a mortar attack and they shoot 30 mortars after eachother then the skyshiels would have no problem with that 2x15. But the Aster30 will 1 the objects are to small, 2 Aster30 has 3x8 launchers= 24, 3 it can only fire 16 missiles in a short time because the aster also works with 1 radar unit and 4 the high cost.
glendelio 1 year ago
Thats why America has stealth....
2 kinds of aircraft,targets and stealth....
ClarksonsinUSA 2 years ago