If you abolish the patent system, then it becomes purely manufacturing and all those jobs went to China and India where labor is cheap -- so good luck with that. The rise of globalization requires IP protection to keep America competitive -- otherwise, we have nothing left to offer the world, we're screwed then.
Also, the big problem is pharmaceuticals is that it's really easy to copy -- once you know the active ingredients, you can pretty much do it. Even with other inventions, China is really good at copying things and so, if anything, patents protects us from Chinese companies selling rip-offs at half the price. So think about that also -- it prevents foreigners from destroying the U.S. economy.
Also, people should look up Phil Salin. He wrote an article on freedom of speech for software writers. Probably the best article I've ever read on software patents.
So how about Microsoft threatening Linux companies and companies that use Linux (eg. Tom tom), state that they're infringing on patents, but won't say which ones or what code is offensive.
Nice way for Microsoft to abuse open source system. They get to look at other people's code, while no outsiders can look at Microsoft's code.
Why does Microsoft get away with this unconstitutional bullying?
Everyone would. The only difference is that it wouldn't cost millions of dollars. Take the case of open source software. Tons of open source operating systems and applications for every purpose and platform and they all include their own source code so that anyone can change and extend them. The "R&D" comes from millions of small contributors whose collective efforts is greater than all corporate software R&D combined and it's practically free. That's how everything would be without patents.
Nobody ever bothers to ask big pharma why it costs them so much time and money. I understand that it's a complicated matter but, it's not that complicated. Because of patents, they have every incentive to exaggerate the costs and to delay new drugs so they can gouge people. Without patents, I think the market would separate drug research from drug production. We'd see lots of drug producers donating to colleges and universities for all the major R&D which would then become public knowledge.
That's because in America, our economic system is capitalism, and the goal of a publicly-traded corporation is to maximize profits for its shareholders, if not the shareholders themselves can actually sue its own publicly-traded corporation for incompetence. So U.S. corporate law is equally at fault here. Moreover, it's the survival of the fittest mentality, if your competition is doing the same thing, you better do it, or otherwise your company is going to go out of business.
@Molo9000 Yes but if you check some of the areas that are patent-free like music . People still bother on creating new products even thought they know it will be pirated or copied...
There is no evidence of evolution of mankind from any other species. It is easy to prove.
Check out my vids. I have studied this for over 40 years. I have no religion and I certainly never want to be indoctrinated by some idiot named Ken. Do your own thinking. Don't be the clone of someone elses thought process and beliefs.
Well often times the inventors apply for a patent before they start commercializing the product for two primary reasons: (1) don't want someone else to file the same patent before you, and (2) you need venture capital funds and they will only invest in you if they see patents.
law is a negative concept. the law exists to prevent INJUSTICE from ocurring. if the law existed to create justice, you would need to create an inifinite amount of laws. frederic bastiat's the law is a good source for this type of information. also, i do agree with the speaker that the govt should be out of the business of granting exclusive rights to individuals. right on
How is the patent system anywhere else in the world? Like Europe and Asia? Is it similar to the US system or different and provide possible solutions or extra problems?
If you abolish the patent system, then it becomes purely manufacturing and all those jobs went to China and India where labor is cheap -- so good luck with that. The rise of globalization requires IP protection to keep America competitive -- otherwise, we have nothing left to offer the world, we're screwed then.
yankswin11 3 months ago
Also, the big problem is pharmaceuticals is that it's really easy to copy -- once you know the active ingredients, you can pretty much do it. Even with other inventions, China is really good at copying things and so, if anything, patents protects us from Chinese companies selling rip-offs at half the price. So think about that also -- it prevents foreigners from destroying the U.S. economy.
yankswin11 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video. I have seen more videos there don't have provided the good information. This is simple and powerful.
BY,
Informaticsoutsourcing
(Professional IP Service Company)
dineshseosharp 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Space Coast Business Center is a 5 minute drive to Melbourne International Airport (MLB). Very affordable and private office suites available:
Call for an appointment 3216138550
deltabully 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Space Coast Business Center is a 5 minute drive to Melbourne International Airport (MLB). Very affordable and private office suites available:
Call for an appointment 3216138550 spacecoastbiz com
deltabully 6 months ago
The man introducing the speaker shouldn't be allowed to speak. He's really boring...
kylemartin3 1 year ago
Also, people should look up Phil Salin. He wrote an article on freedom of speech for software writers. Probably the best article I've ever read on software patents.
a1mint 2 years ago
So how about Microsoft threatening Linux companies and companies that use Linux (eg. Tom tom), state that they're infringing on patents, but won't say which ones or what code is offensive.
Nice way for Microsoft to abuse open source system. They get to look at other people's code, while no outsiders can look at Microsoft's code.
Why does Microsoft get away with this unconstitutional bullying?
a1mint 2 years ago
Comment removed
Piscivorus 2 years ago
genetic data is not patentable! thats absurd!
Mother nature is inherently open source!
(otherwise we shouldent be backwards engeneering it! evolution could sue us!)
also sciense is harmed by patents
and anyway big pharmasuticals dont inovate all they do is pain relife no cures!
cured patiens dont bring in money its better to let them suffer and antestetise them to death.
ZerqTM 2 years ago
Abolish the patent system completely. There is no good reason for it.
Piscivorus 3 years ago
Who's going to invest millions and millions of dollars into R&D if other companies can just copy the results?
Patents are probably misued a lot, but they are needed.
Molo9000 2 years ago
Comment removed
Piscivorus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone would. The only difference is that it wouldn't cost millions of dollars. Take the case of open source software. Tons of open source operating systems and applications for every purpose and platform and they all include their own source code so that anyone can change and extend them. The "R&D" comes from millions of small contributors whose collective efforts is greater than all corporate software R&D combined and it's practically free. That's how everything would be without patents.
Piscivorus 2 years ago
This works with software, because developing software doesn't take a big investment and because distributing software costs next to nothing.
But how would this work with pharmaceutical products? It takes years and years of development and testing before u can put a new drug on the market.
If other companies can just copy the drug, they have a huge advantage over the one that sunk all the R&D costs into the project.
Molo9000 2 years ago
Nobody ever bothers to ask big pharma why it costs them so much time and money. I understand that it's a complicated matter but, it's not that complicated. Because of patents, they have every incentive to exaggerate the costs and to delay new drugs so they can gouge people. Without patents, I think the market would separate drug research from drug production. We'd see lots of drug producers donating to colleges and universities for all the major R&D which would then become public knowledge.
Piscivorus 2 years ago
@Piscivorus
That's because in America, our economic system is capitalism, and the goal of a publicly-traded corporation is to maximize profits for its shareholders, if not the shareholders themselves can actually sue its own publicly-traded corporation for incompetence. So U.S. corporate law is equally at fault here. Moreover, it's the survival of the fittest mentality, if your competition is doing the same thing, you better do it, or otherwise your company is going to go out of business.
yankswin11 3 months ago
what benefit has been brought about so far?
scilonthreat 2 years ago
@Molo9000 Yes but if you check some of the areas that are patent-free like music . People still bother on creating new products even thought they know it will be pirated or copied...
madridisinSpain 8 months ago
@madridisinSpain
That's because creating music doesn't costs millions of dollars in scientific research and development.
yankswin11 3 months ago
Is the slide available for download?
chihchun 3 years ago
Always a pleasure getting to see you, Mr. Ravicher.
neoncowgirl1982 3 years ago
There is no evidence of evolution of mankind from any other species. It is easy to prove.
Check out my vids. I have studied this for over 40 years. I have no religion and I certainly never want to be indoctrinated by some idiot named Ken. Do your own thinking. Don't be the clone of someone elses thought process and beliefs.
GoodScienceForYou 3 years ago
Great talk.
veers0r 3 years ago
Patents should not apply unless the company holding it has a product on the market, that simple.
(ok, maybe give the company a year or something. But if it isnt avaiable for a reasonable price, the patent, or copyright, shouldnt apply)
twdarkflame 3 years ago 3
@twdarkflame
Well often times the inventors apply for a patent before they start commercializing the product for two primary reasons: (1) don't want someone else to file the same patent before you, and (2) you need venture capital funds and they will only invest in you if they see patents.
yankswin11 3 months ago
A big thank you for repeating the questions we couldn't hear. What was the last patent slide @ 36:47?
DrHavanger 3 years ago
Im an Asian. I like this clip.
It gives me some basic idea about patten, which sounds reasonable. Nice clip, thanx.
opengl4 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol he says ERR to much. every sentence Errrr ERRRR kinda anoying. good vid tho
craig13oy 3 years ago
law is a negative concept. the law exists to prevent INJUSTICE from ocurring. if the law existed to create justice, you would need to create an inifinite amount of laws. frederic bastiat's the law is a good source for this type of information. also, i do agree with the speaker that the govt should be out of the business of granting exclusive rights to individuals. right on
ams5995 3 years ago
How is the patent system anywhere else in the world? Like Europe and Asia? Is it similar to the US system or different and provide possible solutions or extra problems?
plasticdingetje 3 years ago
Its pretty simerla in europe, much the same problems/benifits.
twdarkflame 3 years ago
ola
narutard90here 3 years ago
wow
it´s incredible ´cuz they can upload videos of more than 48 minutes :O
narutard90here 3 years ago
Very important, great video, thanks
semiliteratedgod 3 years ago 6