Added: 4 years ago
From: BigTomRS4
Views: 24,732
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @kubaXxX777 you are such a ignorant idiot you and your shitty image car Audi. go to gtboard and type in M3 CSL 2003 vs new rs4 2008 and see the rs4 ass hande over to it,how much more an old rs4,the driver in the M3 here cant shift for shit,and just a lame race like this don't prove the performance of a car. search for some official race

  • @kay19833 who's the ignorant idiot here? You can't take the fact that in some cases an Audi can team up with, or even beat, a BMW? Yes, it's unfair considering the power (350 vs 440) so it SHOULD win in this case.

    Nonetheless, both cars are excellent; I really don't see the need for flaming either of them. Looks and prestige? Audi. Pure performance, on or off track? BMW. No need to bash eachother's skull here, just accept that sometimes Audi's are faster than Bimmers, and vice versa.

  • @muizenissen for an audi to be faster it always need 150more horses but as soon as we only have 50hp more in either of them then we all know audi is a toast. anyways BMW is a better car in general. endless engine of the year award, audi can only dream of that.

  • @kay19833 You know that's bullshit, right? You can't say BMW IS better. You THINK BMW is better. To each his or her preference, and why should you care that I like Audi better? If anything - BMW is toast in any condition other than perfect dry asphalt. How about that :).

    I don't like BMW's image. I don't like their drivers, their styling. My OPINION is that Audi is better, but that doesn't make them better. Both are excellent cars, no need to bash eachother for that.

  • bye bye bmw

  • M3 is an amazing car natural engine straight 6 no big v8s or twin turbos here. Bang a turbo on the m3 then you could put anything you like up against it and you ll get hammered and i mean ANYTHING!!!.

  • Ive got a 400rwhp and 430lbs ft 135i that will hand your ass to you.. would love to see your face when it gallops off into the distance.

  • 135i is a blast!! congrats man! 3.0 litre, 300 hp... 6 inline... that's a wow!

    and 128i without the twin turbo is still a great and fun car to drive, with an excellent relation price/features!

  • NO FUCKING CHANCE BRO, NO CHANCE

    RS4 will own anyday, i wished they l;et the m3 get a start ahead, hah that wouldve been killer

  • or use the latest m3 xD haha.. love the way the e46 is still fighting these days even if there is "no chance"

    there is tsill that .. lets kill off the e46 image lol.

  • No shit it's gonna beat it :D

  • RS4 old one, 380HP.

  • Good race

  • u biti možda je i stari Rs4, vevidi se dobro,pokaušao sam zaključiti po turbinama koje je imao stari al se baš i nečuju, provjerim ovo pa se javim..

  • hah,keep dreamin`...the new one has 440hp...

  • ...ovo je stari M, 343 Hp, i Novi Rs4 420hp, slažem se da je nepravedna trka...

  • kako bre novi rs4? gde ti zivis cobane??,  jel ti vidis kako izgleda unutrasnjost ovog audia? pa moj A4 1995 godiste isto tako izgleda znaci radi se o staroj verziji rs4...

  • M soltanian is asshole, RS4 have 380hp not 440... Bastard you dont know nothing about it... Audi Rules RS kick ass M...

  • 50 hp of difference anyway... BMW Power!!!

  • 380-343 = 50??

  • ok, my maths are not fine, but 37 hp it is still a difference... not to mention M3 E46 is not turbo charged and only 6 cylinders... M3 performance with that "few" features is better than other biggest engines! BMW rules!

  • well, a station wagon shouldn't be compared to a much lighter and stiffer coupé anyway. the M3 is a sports car, the RS4 is a fast but also quite agile highway racer with a lot of understatement and practical use.

    by the way, you mentioned "big engines":

    M3 E46: 3.2litre inline 6 - 343HP

    RS4 B5 (old one): 2.7 litre BiTurbo V6 - 380HP

    new M3: 4.0litre V8 - 420HP

    new RS4: 4.2litre V8 - 420HP

  • Well, you see how the biturbo increases the HP's in all cars... more HP are bigger engines from my point of view.

    And even the RS4 is a station wagon I consider it a sport version as M3 is.

    I would really love to see what is best between the new M3 and the new RS4, even this last one has 0.2 litre more I can bet that M3 will make a best performance.

    Please post a link if you see one comparing these both new versions, thanks.

  • well yes, but you have to consider the weight, power/weight ratio, balance, chassis etc of a car. the M3 is a great sports car, though ive never driven it i like the looks and the sound of it (at least the old one had a fantastic engine). i have driven both the old (in fact i own one) and the new RS4 and all i can say is that the new one is quite heavy (1900kg) and its engine could use a bit more torque. however, its an easy and fun drive.

    the M3, in contrast, is a light coupé...

  • have you got a link where they are compared? i once spotted a top gear video on youtube where they compare the C63 AMG, the RS4 (sedan) and the M3 (coupé) to each other...

    i guess, considering performance, the RS4 and the M3 are quite close to each other, as both have the same engine output. on a track, the M3 will be faster though as it's more agile and lighter but also a stiffer ride.

    i like all three of them...though im not a fan of mercedes' (and AMG) philosophy...

  • I just watched this, you might find it interesting

    watch?v=axb19DwhqUk&feature=ch­annel

  • thanks mate

  • @pippomadrid why? its not even the same cars

    

  • @raggardallen they don't need to be the same

  • Lame race, Racing a 440HP car to a 333HP car. What the???

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more