Added: 4 months ago
From: TigerDirectBlog
Views: 82,596
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (536)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 8Bit audio on a 64 bit system classic

  • Nice enough packaging to hold up to one's face.

  • LOGAN INTERNET MISSED YOU

  • fuking state of the case looks like its retarded

  • Is the case built out of LEGOS?

  • that case is ONE UGLY MOTHERFUCKER.....

  • This thing will kick major but as soon as the software catches up. Pretty much everything is at quadcore at this time. may not be fast as an intel but this thing shreds everything when it comes to multitasking.

  • So, can I play crysis with my 8120? cool.

    So, can I overclock it? coooooool.

    So, at full potential kills everything? REALLY COOL!

    So, it's AMD? Unholly-Extremely-Unblieveable­-Greatfully-Über-AndMoreBigCra­pThings COOL!

  • Comment removed

  • @18T220 nice i have the i7 2600k and i love it

  • Whats better for games FX-8120 or i7 2600K?

  • @18T220 For games you can go with a fx-4100 and a nice video card, hd 7770 at least. And of course a nice motherboard, am3+ socket, 9 series chipset like asus m5a99x.

  • @18T220 2500k...... 2600k has hyperthreading which you do not need for gaming and its 100 dollars more

  • @18T220 about the same but amd is much cheaper so i would go with amd

  • @galenator123 I don't undertand this point. AMD is no longer "cheaper". The only way AMD is cheaper is if you compare a processor by only the number of cores it has and completely disregard performance. I will conceed it may be of better value if your planning on running several VM or something. But for a gaming rig and general everyday use the 2500k is cheaper and faster. You can pair a $180 i5 with a cheap $100 and get 4.5ghz easy.

  • @18T220 if you just gaming go with the 2500k buy if you also do video editing go with the 2600k.and dont youch the fx 8120

  • @buzz9961

    Yea i'm going with the 2500k overclocked to 3.7ghz, I do video editing but not much.

    Thanks for the advice. What CPU do you have?

  • Comment removed

  • @buzz9961 I just got the Fx-8120, I overclocked it stable 24/7 to 4.5ghz and it beats the 2600k.

  • @Moution23 so?if you overclock the 2600k to 4.5 ghz it will beat it

  • @buzz9961 Not exactly, remenber that BD is 8 cores, it will render better in a app that uses multicores.

  • @Moution23 Beats it in what? WinZip? LoL

  • @lamiac2411 oh u funny

  • @lamiac2411 WinRar too

  • type in youtube : AMD GOES BANKRUPT

  • logan!!!!! man you the best reviewer i have ever seen!,so happy to see you back! ...but man i miss your humour! hope it come back soon!!!

    ps..(im not gay)

  • that case looks nice but couldnt u get a black one?

  • @detroid89

    There is of course a black one, this one is the Snow Edition (would prolly suit good for a hackintosh :o)

  • i want your job

  • Epic fail

  • @intelgigabyte I overclocked my bulldozer to 5ghz problem intelfag? it shits all over your intel

  • why is every1 saying faildozer, 6100 does better than my intel 2500k.

  • FAILDOZER!

  • @buzz9961 You just hate it because you can't afford one

  • @Cqub3 i hate it because how it looks...

  • @buzz9961 The scores?

  • thermaltake level 10 gt is an awful looking case

  • i want the Satellites processor running on my computer lol.

  • That case is awful

  • @Moution23 lol.. yes. yes it is. xD

  • @Moution23 yeah this is fucking teriblle

  • @Moution23 expensive too

  • @Moution23 go choose one that makes you feel bigger down there then you junksucker

  • It has 8mb L2 not 4.

  • Install the 2 patches Microsoft released, and ignore the benchmarks some "review" sites do, because they show BIAS toward intel, that patch really work and the FX will perform better and will use the cores better, proven on my fx-8120, GA-990FX-UD3.

    before it was a collection of peaks on idle, and single core apps, going from 1.4GHz to 4.1GHz, through out all the cores.

    after the patch, idle stays at 1.4GHz, on single core only one core rises the speed and stays that way.

    a great improvement.

  • Comment removed

  • overclocked to 4.1 ghz, xan it compare to the I7?

  • Yay Logans back!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @buzz9961 Well you're kinda right but not quite. The problem about the low scores (even lower than phenom ii x6 and x4) on benchmarks seems to be in Windows 7. It doesn't spread the work as it should because = the first thing in matter should be spreading the work across the four modules (you know each one in the bulldozer architecture has two cores) and from there - to the cores. But the Windows doesn't see modules, it sees 8 cores.

    It's only a suggestion

  • @buzz9961 intel had the same problem when they came with HT

    If we speak for gaming builds Phenom II x4 would do pretty enough as right now games are optimized for quad cores, they don't bother to use any more than 4 cores, so a quadcore with higher frequency is a better choice than 6 or 8 cores on lower frequency. In my case I find my Phenom II x2 555 BE to be the perfect one, since I unlocked its two dormant cores transforming it from x2 @3.2 to x4 @3.9 ghz... best bang for the buck!

  • I have an Intel in my pc right now .. I'm NOT sattisfied .. I'm going to get an AMD , this CPU this month. FUCK YOU INTEL. AMD ROCKS !

  • @LAZrailkapinda I know right i had a intel 1.7 ghz and hated it so i got a 1.6ghz for my laptop a few years ago, i can play most games that needs 2.4 ghz cpu on mid settings with the AMD, and with the intel 1 i could not even load the game.

  • music is epic win :)

  • i have a AMD Radeon HD7970 so im not a fanboy when i say this, intel cpus fucken pwn amd cpus, but i love amd gpus

  • I will buy the FX 8120 next week <3

  • @joka6disst6dich6 im so sorry for you review and seek benchmarks before u buy this

  • Faildozer

  • Logan lives.

  • where are the fucking game benchmarks? i want to see them, i have fx-6100 oc'd to 4,8 ghz and i want to see your benchmarks!!! i'm better than u Logan;D

  • i was gonna buy a intel 2600k but then i took an arrow to the knee

  • @KillerCinemaHD Im takin away a thumbs up because of the overused meme. Arrows are so 2011.

  • @pcman500 thats true

  • you look like wolverine

  • missing more benchmarks...

  • What the heck is that to the right? his tower?????

  • @PPCLOCK yep, it's a Thermaltake level 10 GT: snow edition.

  • @thebeetalls

    It looks awesome.

  • @PPCLOCK Too bad it is so damn expensive.

  • i get over 7 with a amd 1100t at 4ghz

  • smart they designed the cpu for windows 8, it runs far better in 8 then 7 thats for sure

  • Fail.com 

  • why AMD processors always has lower cache memory

  • I LOVE THIS....AMD comes out with BULLDOZER.... AMD FANS say they are upset about performance. INTEL FANS are laughing...and the highest end bulldozer the 8 core 8150 CPU is sold out just about everywhere. Retailers can't seem to keep the CPU in stock for very long. Selling like hot cakes. I am an AMD FANBOY and selling like hotcakes and constantly being out of stock is what AMD need to boost sales!!! WAY TO GO AMD!!! SWEET!!!

  • @skaczkurkin :)

    I am a AMD Fan As well

    AMD FTW :D

  • @skaczkurkin it doesnt matter what you like. just dont rant. people dont like other who just rant with little facts. justify every opinion you have.

  • 8core with 8 mb cache = fail 4core with 8 treads and 8mb cache = win win

  • @Arnoud1987000

    AMD processors always has lower cache memory ((thats annoying me))

  • bullcrap

  • Part 2 ????????????

  • i just resubbed because of logan :|

  • sound is annoying 

  • asshole 

  • Big screen ;)

  • people dont understand that bulldozer is around i5 and i7 lets call it i6

    so its like having two i6 in one

    it is still a better choice than i5 but not as expensive as i7

    plus in some tasks the bulldozer is better than i7

  • @TOWAERlO

    Can you say Is it worth it or not? Im using painter 12 and CS DP CS 5.5

  • @TOWAERlO good way of explaining it cuz it is also in between in price as well best comparison defientely and unfanboyish

  • Digeber over 8,50 GHz!!!!

  • @timlunberg666 I have the 8150 and it plays crysis 2, dues ex, and battlefield 3 just fine. Tool6911 is right. your video card must suck. best invest in a new one.

  • Ooooh, thats like the fucking biggest tower I've ever seen... I likie...

  • @2011Decision then u must have not seen the haf X from coolermaster

  • i bought this cpu nad it cant play deusx,shogon 2,or crysis

  • @timlundberg666 then your gfx cards sucks

  • I'm waiting for Trinity / piledriver / dual hd70xx

    

  • This was released to challenge Sandy Bridge so you should compare it to that, a 2500K is the same price so that's a fair comparison IMO :-)

  • I see a Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann desktop in th background... I think I love tou

  • is this even for the 6 core bulldozer.

    I was thinking about getting that one.

    All I can say about the 8 core-Another one bites the dust.

  • @HQGameZ so is it really bad

  • @PsychoEditing from what I here, yes

  • I got a score of 6.3 at 3.8GHz on my 1075T.

    They only get .09 better with 2 more cores and +.2 GHz?

    I don't know how amazing these new chips are yet, but maybe I'll get convinced.

  • Logan is back,thats the good news not the amd bobcat

  • Amd the world record breakers at over 8 ghz if you done that on intel it would catch fire due to the overheating .

  • i7 2600k FTW

  • I don't feel so bad with my ''old' i7 875k @ 4.3Ghz Cinebench gets 7.35 pts.. curious to see how well these chips do with the upcoming patch for windows 7

  • i got a fx 8150

  • i 5 2500 k 3,3 FTW

  • I am getting a brand new computer with this Bulldozer sweet sweet!

  • @MrGrakkus Sweet?? I guess you haven't seen the benchmarks....

  • @TheTrafficker85 oh yes i have :)...and i bet u are some intel fan ?...too bad ;)

  • @MrGrakkus lol, you couldn't be further from the truth on that. I'm running an AMD phenom X2 quad core black edition (overclocked) its a great CPU when you look at the price to performance ratio.

    Unfortunately I will not be upgrading to the bulldozer due to the fact that AMD promised us a revolutionary processor but actually delivered nothing more than a heap of junk. It can't even beat the performance on last generation processors but it costs the same amount!?

    Bulldozer= Epic Fail

  • @TheTrafficker85 ......i think that they tought about maing it better than some 2 year old prossessor mate..else they werent even alowed to make shit.

  • @MrGrakkus Sorry, your comment didn't really make sense so I'm not sure what you're trying to say.....

  • @TheTrafficker85 glubradgg....ffw...asegffegege­geggesg,feffaff. Allobdsgs see ?

  • @MrGrakkus I guess that's what people say when they don't have a point to make. Enjoy that sweet piece of junk you're going to buy! :-)

  • I have it, stock cooler is unbearable LOUD - like a jet f-cking engine ! 

  • part two of the video failed to show because they couldn't get the chip to do as bad as they wanted :P

  • if 5.08 is good im jesus

  • You said 12mbs of Cache.. its 16 yo.

  • remember guys when someone is overpowered weaklings try to destroy him

  • Where's Part two of the failed benchmarks?

  • are you still alive? where's the 2nd part?

  • The New Intel i7-2700k will trash this.

  • LIAR! 

  • Отстой....

  • My 2600k buttfucks this one! :D 

  • @intelgigabyte HAHAHA REALLY !? i guess so. BUT does the 2600k have a nice box like that? i dont think so hahahaha

  • @intelgigabyte and my 990X buttfucks your 2600k! XD

  • @TheTrafficker85 Touche! :D 

  • @intelgigabyte see what you started with all this talk of buttfucking, now I'm off to go buttfuck my girlfriend!! XD

  • @TheTrafficker85 Dont forget the lube and post a vid of it on youtube! xD

  • @intelgigabyte lol no it doesent..this vid doesent show anything actually ;)

  • @intelgigabyte 2500k buttfucks this one :D

  • @intelgigabyte

    FATALITY

  • @intelgigabyte Does Intel pay you to say this crap? Maybe its really you buttfucking your 2600k..

  • @LordSamuelJ yeah its AMD, nothing to do with intel at all

  • @intelgigabyte buy some icecream

    

  • @intelgigabyte smart fool this is a 8120 now when the 8170 comes out that on par with your 2600k at least talk about the 8150 if your going to compare cpu to cpu that's al least closer in price. you like your 2600k so you running it at stock or did you overclock? Your not saying anything abut what your running except your 2600k give it to you. List what's in your rig also TARD.

  • where is the part 2?

  • i thought the advantage of 8 cores was supposed to come out only when running multiple monitors and multicore applications of the future...maybe its just to early for 8 cores??

  • lol what a piece of crap

  • wow hello Logan!!!!!(L)

  • Are you trying to sell me this bs?

  • So where's the game and performance reviews? Its already almost a week. I'm sure you are discovering that the AMD FX-8120 is bottlenecking the HD6990.

  • what is the name of that case he is using on that PC

  • @Xboxshqip Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition

  • Doesn't Any one but me see the trend here? Sandy bridge has a GPU built in which aids in performance there are certain calculations better suited for a GPU. Now put a AMD GPU on a Bulldozer what do you get? I however think AMD is an ass for releasing this crap so late. They should have just released the dumb shit and get started with APU with bulldozer right away. And it looks like thye gonna take another century to do that @ which point intel would be miles a head.

  • This cpu's shit And everyone knows it.

  • @SuperRiguy not entirely tue, this processor does have some strengths.. Ive seen it beat a 2600k in several real world benchmarks, and it is the best for video encoding.. I am going to try one soon and I will review it when I get it

  • @terrac1de I just got one for a media center build and the FX 8150 does good on video, video software uses as many cores as possible so your sir are correct!

  • awesome LOGAN !!

  • <3 the 8-bit music

  • are you wearing a blazer that doesn't fit you with a black Tshirt with a logo underneath?

  • Sandy Bridge killer my ass.. Performance that is CLOSE to the i7 960 at stock? Wow AMD... just... wow. I have nothing against AMD (running with AMD Phenom II right now) but for the love of God, stop over-hyping your product when it can't beat a 2010 Intel processor or even your own hex-core. AMD are so far behind and it saddens me. =(

  • bulldozer is ok but way to much hype per performance.... barely having with "last gen" i5s = Fail- wait till ivy bridge and get your mind blown

  • Maybe at single-threaded applications, but from everything I've seen the FX series are built for multi-threaded applications and excel at it. It depends on purpose, but I'm watching to see whether from now it goes to worse or better.

  • for 200$ its not that bad i picked mine up and overclocked it two 4.2 on a zalman fan

  • Where's part 2 of the benchmarks

  • I can't believe how hard Intel fanboys are hitting, seriously people with no life. Its about the consumer, not about being fanboys. There will be people who prefer this power at this price, instead of a higher priced Intel. Get over it.

  • @PenguinRecordings plus a lot of people dont understand that those benchmarks they saw were mainly for gaming with nvidia and intel's chipset. it's really annoying how people see benchmarks and reviews and quickly believe that the processor is garbage lol. they should compare them both are multi-threaded applications and see which cpu maxes out between i5/i7 vs bulldozer.

  • @niwrem1 My thoughts exactly. Isn't it also possible that the benchmark software is also code-wise not ready to fully utilize AMD's new architecture? If anyone studied the PS3's history, it can be noted that developers struggled to get games running well with the processor because its architecture was vastly different(not bad) . This goes to show that old code with new hardware isn't always going to be a breeze. AMD have always built for the future. They were the first with 64bit as well.

  • It beats intel in aplications where cpu speeds matters like bf3 and 3d rendering and thats all that matters to me.

    All my other programs are fast enough anyway and i wouldn't notice any difference with an i7 anyway

  • No tech update? :(

  • Do a new tech update already...

  • if the Bulldozer were a car, it would be classified a lemon, true story!

  • Wow, the butthurt AMD kids are out in force today!

  • Wow amd thsi is shit my i5 is better at stock speed Wow my i3 can almost beat this

    You know what fucking intell pricks FUCK THEM THIS IS LIKE 4 TIMES LESS THEN THE 960 AT what was it stock speeds and thats one thousand dollers this is 200.. now tell me ? intel fan's HOW YOU FUCKING LIKE ME NOW HOW DO YOU FUCKING LIKE ME NOW BITCH!

  • @playPS3play wat? i5 2500k is cheaper then 8150 and better