This thing will kick major but as soon as the software catches up. Pretty much everything is at quadcore at this time. may not be fast as an intel but this thing shreds everything when it comes to multitasking.
@18T220 For games you can go with a fx-4100 and a nice video card, hd 7770 at least. And of course a nice motherboard, am3+ socket, 9 series chipset like asus m5a99x.
@galenator123 I don't undertand this point. AMD is no longer "cheaper". The only way AMD is cheaper is if you compare a processor by only the number of cores it has and completely disregard performance. I will conceed it may be of better value if your planning on running several VM or something. But for a gaming rig and general everyday use the 2500k is cheaper and faster. You can pair a $180 i5 with a cheap $100 and get 4.5ghz easy.
@18T220 lol i have intel core 2 dou e8400 :( but i will get a new pc when ivy bridge come out.and if you want a great cooler to overclock the 2500k to 4.7 ghz maybe even 5.0 go with Noctua NH-C14 its cost around 80$-90$ and its awsome!and if you need something im glad to help you
Install the 2 patches Microsoft released, and ignore the benchmarks some "review" sites do, because they show BIAS toward intel, that patch really work and the FX will perform better and will use the cores better, proven on my fx-8120, GA-990FX-UD3.
before it was a collection of peaks on idle, and single core apps, going from 1.4GHz to 4.1GHz, through out all the cores.
after the patch, idle stays at 1.4GHz, on single core only one core rises the speed and stays that way.
@buzz9961 Well you're kinda right but not quite. The problem about the low scores (even lower than phenom ii x6 and x4) on benchmarks seems to be in Windows 7. It doesn't spread the work as it should because = the first thing in matter should be spreading the work across the four modules (you know each one in the bulldozer architecture has two cores) and from there - to the cores. But the Windows doesn't see modules, it sees 8 cores.
@buzz9961 intel had the same problem when they came with HT
If we speak for gaming builds Phenom II x4 would do pretty enough as right now games are optimized for quad cores, they don't bother to use any more than 4 cores, so a quadcore with higher frequency is a better choice than 6 or 8 cores on lower frequency. In my case I find my Phenom II x2 555 BE to be the perfect one, since I unlocked its two dormant cores transforming it from x2 @3.2 to x4 @3.9 ghz... best bang for the buck!
@LAZrailkapinda I know right i had a intel 1.7 ghz and hated it so i got a 1.6ghz for my laptop a few years ago, i can play most games that needs 2.4 ghz cpu on mid settings with the AMD, and with the intel 1 i could not even load the game.
where are the fucking game benchmarks? i want to see them, i have fx-6100 oc'd to 4,8 ghz and i want to see your benchmarks!!! i'm better than u Logan;D
I LOVE THIS....AMD comes out with BULLDOZER.... AMD FANS say they are upset about performance. INTEL FANS are laughing...and the highest end bulldozer the 8 core 8150 CPU is sold out just about everywhere. Retailers can't seem to keep the CPU in stock for very long. Selling like hot cakes. I am an AMD FANBOY and selling like hotcakes and constantly being out of stock is what AMD need to boost sales!!! WAY TO GO AMD!!! SWEET!!!
@timlunberg666 I have the 8150 and it plays crysis 2, dues ex, and battlefield 3 just fine. Tool6911 is right. your video card must suck. best invest in a new one.
@timlunberg666 I have the 8150 and it plays crysis 2, dues ex, and battlefield 3 just fine. Tool6911 is right. your video card must suck. best invest in a new one.
TIGERDIRECT IS A TERRIBLE COMPANY. bought a 1400 horribly constructed sony vaio from them. No one be fooled in buying highend laptops or computers from tigerdirect they will screw you after a month!!
I don't feel so bad with my ''old' i7 875k @ 4.3Ghz Cinebench gets 7.35 pts.. curious to see how well these chips do with the upcoming patch for windows 7
@MrGrakkus lol, you couldn't be further from the truth on that. I'm running an AMD phenom X2 quad core black edition (overclocked) its a great CPU when you look at the price to performance ratio.
Unfortunately I will not be upgrading to the bulldozer due to the fact that AMD promised us a revolutionary processor but actually delivered nothing more than a heap of junk. It can't even beat the performance on last generation processors but it costs the same amount!?
@TheTrafficker85 ......i think that they tought about maing it better than some 2 year old prossessor mate..else they werent even alowed to make shit.
@intelgigabyte smart fool this is a 8120 now when the 8170 comes out that on par with your 2600k at least talk about the 8150 if your going to compare cpu to cpu that's al least closer in price. you like your 2600k so you running it at stock or did you overclock? Your not saying anything abut what your running except your 2600k give it to you. List what's in your rig also TARD.
i thought the advantage of 8 cores was supposed to come out only when running multiple monitors and multicore applications of the future...maybe its just to early for 8 cores??
So where's the game and performance reviews? Its already almost a week. I'm sure you are discovering that the AMD FX-8120 is bottlenecking the HD6990.
Doesn't Any one but me see the trend here? Sandy bridge has a GPU built in which aids in performance there are certain calculations better suited for a GPU. Now put a AMD GPU on a Bulldozer what do you get? I however think AMD is an ass for releasing this crap so late. They should have just released the dumb shit and get started with APU with bulldozer right away. And it looks like thye gonna take another century to do that @ which point intel would be miles a head.
@SuperRiguy not entirely tue, this processor does have some strengths.. Ive seen it beat a 2600k in several real world benchmarks, and it is the best for video encoding.. I am going to try one soon and I will review it when I get it
@terrac1de I just got one for a media center build and the FX 8150 does good on video, video software uses as many cores as possible so your sir are correct!
Sandy Bridge killer my ass.. Performance that is CLOSE to the i7 960 at stock? Wow AMD... just... wow. I have nothing against AMD (running with AMD Phenom II right now) but for the love of God, stop over-hyping your product when it can't beat a 2010 Intel processor or even your own hex-core. AMD are so far behind and it saddens me. =(
Maybe at single-threaded applications, but from everything I've seen the FX series are built for multi-threaded applications and excel at it. It depends on purpose, but I'm watching to see whether from now it goes to worse or better.
I can't believe how hard Intel fanboys are hitting, seriously people with no life. Its about the consumer, not about being fanboys. There will be people who prefer this power at this price, instead of a higher priced Intel. Get over it.
@PenguinRecordings plus a lot of people dont understand that those benchmarks they saw were mainly for gaming with nvidia and intel's chipset. it's really annoying how people see benchmarks and reviews and quickly believe that the processor is garbage lol. they should compare them both are multi-threaded applications and see which cpu maxes out between i5/i7 vs bulldozer.
@niwrem1 My thoughts exactly. Isn't it also possible that the benchmark software is also code-wise not ready to fully utilize AMD's new architecture? If anyone studied the PS3's history, it can be noted that developers struggled to get games running well with the processor because its architecture was vastly different(not bad) . This goes to show that old code with new hardware isn't always going to be a breeze. AMD have always built for the future. They were the first with 64bit as well.
Wow amd thsi is shit my i5 is better at stock speed Wow my i3 can almost beat this
You know what fucking intell pricks FUCK THEM THIS IS LIKE 4 TIMES LESS THEN THE 960 AT what was it stock speeds and thats one thousand dollers this is 200.. now tell me ? intel fan's HOW YOU FUCKING LIKE ME NOW HOW DO YOU FUCKING LIKE ME NOW BITCH!
8Bit audio on a 64 bit system classic
denvera1g1 2 days ago
Nice enough packaging to hold up to one's face.
nortexoid 4 days ago
LOGAN INTERNET MISSED YOU
JoseRozon 5 days ago
fuking state of the case looks like its retarded
nigelhoary 1 week ago
Is the case built out of LEGOS?
xblackxbulllittx 1 week ago
that case is ONE UGLY MOTHERFUCKER.....
mcrayzor1 2 weeks ago 2
This thing will kick major but as soon as the software catches up. Pretty much everything is at quadcore at this time. may not be fast as an intel but this thing shreds everything when it comes to multitasking.
swordbook 2 weeks ago
So, can I play crysis with my 8120? cool.
So, can I overclock it? coooooool.
So, at full potential kills everything? REALLY COOL!
So, it's AMD? Unholly-Extremely-Unblieveable-Greatfully-Über-AndMoreBigCrapThings COOL!
TheXDS 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
18T220 2 weeks ago
@18T220 nice i have the i7 2600k and i love it
BigWillyam 2 weeks ago
Whats better for games FX-8120 or i7 2600K?
18T220 2 weeks ago
@18T220 For games you can go with a fx-4100 and a nice video card, hd 7770 at least. And of course a nice motherboard, am3+ socket, 9 series chipset like asus m5a99x.
marc2377 2 weeks ago
@18T220 2500k...... 2600k has hyperthreading which you do not need for gaming and its 100 dollars more
pyrogreg07 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pyrogreg07
Yea I thought that, I only want a CPU for gaming, I'm getting the i5 2500K overclocked to 3.7ghz on an Asus Maximus board.
Cheers dude.
18T220 2 weeks ago
@18T220 about the same but amd is much cheaper so i would go with amd
galenator123 1 week ago
@galenator123 I don't undertand this point. AMD is no longer "cheaper". The only way AMD is cheaper is if you compare a processor by only the number of cores it has and completely disregard performance. I will conceed it may be of better value if your planning on running several VM or something. But for a gaming rig and general everyday use the 2500k is cheaper and faster. You can pair a $180 i5 with a cheap $100 and get 4.5ghz easy.
lamiac2411 1 week ago
@18T220 if you just gaming go with the 2500k buy if you also do video editing go with the 2600k.and dont youch the fx 8120
buzz9961 1 week ago
@buzz9961
Yea i'm going with the 2500k overclocked to 3.7ghz, I do video editing but not much.
Thanks for the advice. What CPU do you have?
18T220 1 week ago
Comment removed
buzz9961 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@18T220 lol i have intel core 2 dou e8400 :( but i will get a new pc when ivy bridge come out.and if you want a great cooler to overclock the 2500k to 4.7 ghz maybe even 5.0 go with Noctua NH-C14 its cost around 80$-90$ and its awsome!and if you need something im glad to help you
buzz9961 1 week ago
@buzz9961 I just got the Fx-8120, I overclocked it stable 24/7 to 4.5ghz and it beats the 2600k.
Moution23 1 week ago
@Moution23 so?if you overclock the 2600k to 4.5 ghz it will beat it
buzz9961 1 week ago
@buzz9961 Not exactly, remenber that BD is 8 cores, it will render better in a app that uses multicores.
Moution23 1 week ago
@Moution23 Beats it in what? WinZip? LoL
lamiac2411 1 week ago
@lamiac2411 oh u funny
Moution23 1 week ago
@lamiac2411 WinRar too
Moution23 1 week ago
type in youtube : AMD GOES BANKRUPT
Arnoud1987000 3 weeks ago
logan!!!!! man you the best reviewer i have ever seen!,so happy to see you back! ...but man i miss your humour! hope it come back soon!!!
ps..(im not gay)
krsjokerrrrrrrrr 3 weeks ago
that case looks nice but couldnt u get a black one?
detroid89 3 weeks ago
@detroid89
There is of course a black one, this one is the Snow Edition (would prolly suit good for a hackintosh :o)
ThisIsSATA 3 weeks ago
i want your job
buzz9961 3 weeks ago 7
Epic fail
DIEGORJI 4 weeks ago 3
@intelgigabyte I overclocked my bulldozer to 5ghz problem intelfag? it shits all over your intel
stanistheman12 4 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
why is every1 saying faildozer, 6100 does better than my intel 2500k.
AnonymousKev 1 month ago
FAILDOZER!
buzz9961 1 month ago
@buzz9961 You just hate it because you can't afford one
Cqub3 3 weeks ago
@Cqub3 i hate it because how it looks...
buzz9961 3 weeks ago
@buzz9961 The scores?
Cqub3 3 weeks ago
thermaltake level 10 gt is an awful looking case
buzz9961 1 month ago 3
i want the Satellites processor running on my computer lol.
MrNeowarrior 1 month ago
That case is awful
Moution23 1 month ago 31
@Moution23 lol.. yes. yes it is. xD
jesman1985 1 month ago
@Moution23 yeah this is fucking teriblle
buzz9961 1 month ago
@Moution23 expensive too
Tech4U247 3 weeks ago
@Moution23 go choose one that makes you feel bigger down there then you junksucker
blindedby2monkeys 3 weeks ago
It has 8mb L2 not 4.
CarbonFiber97 1 month ago
Install the 2 patches Microsoft released, and ignore the benchmarks some "review" sites do, because they show BIAS toward intel, that patch really work and the FX will perform better and will use the cores better, proven on my fx-8120, GA-990FX-UD3.
before it was a collection of peaks on idle, and single core apps, going from 1.4GHz to 4.1GHz, through out all the cores.
after the patch, idle stays at 1.4GHz, on single core only one core rises the speed and stays that way.
a great improvement.
faustolg 1 month ago
Comment removed
buzz9961 1 month ago
overclocked to 4.1 ghz, xan it compare to the I7?
herrjonna2007 1 month ago
Yay Logans back!!!
Logan800 1 month ago 2
Comment removed
buzz9961 1 month ago
@buzz9961 Well you're kinda right but not quite. The problem about the low scores (even lower than phenom ii x6 and x4) on benchmarks seems to be in Windows 7. It doesn't spread the work as it should because = the first thing in matter should be spreading the work across the four modules (you know each one in the bulldozer architecture has two cores) and from there - to the cores. But the Windows doesn't see modules, it sees 8 cores.
It's only a suggestion
d1sp0sabl3 1 month ago
@buzz9961 intel had the same problem when they came with HT
If we speak for gaming builds Phenom II x4 would do pretty enough as right now games are optimized for quad cores, they don't bother to use any more than 4 cores, so a quadcore with higher frequency is a better choice than 6 or 8 cores on lower frequency. In my case I find my Phenom II x2 555 BE to be the perfect one, since I unlocked its two dormant cores transforming it from x2 @3.2 to x4 @3.9 ghz... best bang for the buck!
d1sp0sabl3 1 month ago
I have an Intel in my pc right now .. I'm NOT sattisfied .. I'm going to get an AMD , this CPU this month. FUCK YOU INTEL. AMD ROCKS !
LAZrailkapinda 1 month ago 3
@LAZrailkapinda I know right i had a intel 1.7 ghz and hated it so i got a 1.6ghz for my laptop a few years ago, i can play most games that needs 2.4 ghz cpu on mid settings with the AMD, and with the intel 1 i could not even load the game.
SuperColleydog 1 month ago
music is epic win :)
DimaDnepr 1 month ago
i have a AMD Radeon HD7970 so im not a fanboy when i say this, intel cpus fucken pwn amd cpus, but i love amd gpus
OmegaFuckingWeapon 1 month ago
I will buy the FX 8120 next week <3
joka6disst6dich6 1 month ago
@joka6disst6dich6 im so sorry for you review and seek benchmarks before u buy this
nervoustwitch77 1 month ago
Faildozer
buzz9961 2 months ago
Logan lives.
Johnalexgray 2 months ago
where are the fucking game benchmarks? i want to see them, i have fx-6100 oc'd to 4,8 ghz and i want to see your benchmarks!!! i'm better than u Logan;D
xariss90 2 months ago
i was gonna buy a intel 2600k but then i took an arrow to the knee
KillerCinemaHD 2 months ago
@KillerCinemaHD Im takin away a thumbs up because of the overused meme. Arrows are so 2011.
pcman500 1 month ago
@pcman500 thats true
KillerCinemaHD 1 month ago
you look like wolverine
Deactivates 2 months ago
missing more benchmarks...
guga2artes 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can someone tell me the advantages of AMD FX-8120 please? Reply to this thanks
Stefanoulis91 2 months ago
What the heck is that to the right? his tower?????
PPCLOCK 2 months ago
@PPCLOCK yep, it's a Thermaltake level 10 GT: snow edition.
thebeetalls 2 months ago
@thebeetalls
It looks awesome.
PPCLOCK 2 months ago
@PPCLOCK Too bad it is so damn expensive.
thebeetalls 2 months ago
i get over 7 with a amd 1100t at 4ghz
stevin47 2 months ago
smart they designed the cpu for windows 8, it runs far better in 8 then 7 thats for sure
Sectionxx8 3 months ago
Fail.com
noomservices 3 months ago
why AMD processors always has lower cache memory
momomadi2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When comes up Windows 7 AMD FX software patch that fix the performance problem?
And when comes up new motherboards that support amd processores and have pci express 3.0?
psforce1 3 months ago
I LOVE THIS....AMD comes out with BULLDOZER.... AMD FANS say they are upset about performance. INTEL FANS are laughing...and the highest end bulldozer the 8 core 8150 CPU is sold out just about everywhere. Retailers can't seem to keep the CPU in stock for very long. Selling like hot cakes. I am an AMD FANBOY and selling like hotcakes and constantly being out of stock is what AMD need to boost sales!!! WAY TO GO AMD!!! SWEET!!!
skaczkurkin 3 months ago
@skaczkurkin :)
I am a AMD Fan As well
AMD FTW :D
zZNinjaAssassinZz 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TigerDirectBlog
@skaczkurkin it doesnt matter what you like. just dont rant. people dont like other who just rant with little facts. justify every opinion you have.
MrGGFluffy 2 months ago
8core with 8 mb cache = fail 4core with 8 treads and 8mb cache = win win
Arnoud1987000 3 months ago
@Arnoud1987000
AMD processors always has lower cache memory ((thats annoying me))
momomadi2 3 months ago
bullcrap
Constantin055 3 months ago
Part 2 ????????????
Fossillarson 3 months ago
i just resubbed because of logan :|
seacuracao 3 months ago 28
sound is annoying
nyehnyi 3 months ago
asshole
AORocker1 3 months ago
Big screen ;)
PoisonBill 3 months ago
people dont understand that bulldozer is around i5 and i7 lets call it i6
so its like having two i6 in one
it is still a better choice than i5 but not as expensive as i7
plus in some tasks the bulldozer is better than i7
TOWAERlO 3 months ago
@TOWAERlO
Can you say Is it worth it or not? Im using painter 12 and CS DP CS 5.5
Timahuable 3 months ago
@TOWAERlO good way of explaining it cuz it is also in between in price as well best comparison defientely and unfanboyish
PsychoEditing 3 months ago
Digeber over 8,50 GHz!!!!
TheTelurKucing 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timlunberg666 I have the 8150 and it plays crysis 2, dues ex, and battlefield 3 just fine. Tool6911 is right. your video card must suck. best invest in a new one.
jawanza72 3 months ago
@timlunberg666 I have the 8150 and it plays crysis 2, dues ex, and battlefield 3 just fine. Tool6911 is right. your video card must suck. best invest in a new one.
jawanza72 3 months ago
Ooooh, thats like the fucking biggest tower I've ever seen... I likie...
2011Decision 3 months ago
@2011Decision then u must have not seen the haf X from coolermaster
tallica4ever1234 3 months ago
i bought this cpu nad it cant play deusx,shogon 2,or crysis
timlundberg666 4 months ago
@timlundberg666 then your gfx cards sucks
tool6911 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TIGERDIRECT IS A TERRIBLE COMPANY. bought a 1400 horribly constructed sony vaio from them. No one be fooled in buying highend laptops or computers from tigerdirect they will screw you after a month!!
89kosmaki 4 months ago
I'm waiting for Trinity / piledriver / dual hd70xx
dave777blaster 4 months ago
This was released to challenge Sandy Bridge so you should compare it to that, a 2500K is the same price so that's a fair comparison IMO :-)
smallpebble7 4 months ago
I see a Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann desktop in th background... I think I love tou
LeleSochokun 4 months ago
is this even for the 6 core bulldozer.
I was thinking about getting that one.
All I can say about the 8 core-Another one bites the dust.
HQGameZ 4 months ago
@HQGameZ so is it really bad
PsychoEditing 3 months ago
@PsychoEditing from what I here, yes
HQGameZ 3 months ago
I got a score of 6.3 at 3.8GHz on my 1075T.
They only get .09 better with 2 more cores and +.2 GHz?
I don't know how amazing these new chips are yet, but maybe I'll get convinced.
wgreenlee4 4 months ago
Logan is back,thats the good news not the amd bobcat
ndragos87 4 months ago
Amd the world record breakers at over 8 ghz if you done that on intel it would catch fire due to the overheating .
paulb4uk 4 months ago
i7 2600k FTW
SNiiP3RxProductionz 4 months ago
I don't feel so bad with my ''old' i7 875k @ 4.3Ghz Cinebench gets 7.35 pts.. curious to see how well these chips do with the upcoming patch for windows 7
crzykid71 4 months ago
i got a fx 8150
gdialpha 4 months ago
i 5 2500 k 3,3 FTW
Durden391 4 months ago
I am getting a brand new computer with this Bulldozer sweet sweet!
MrGrakkus 4 months ago
@MrGrakkus Sweet?? I guess you haven't seen the benchmarks....
TheTrafficker85 4 months ago
@TheTrafficker85 oh yes i have :)...and i bet u are some intel fan ?...too bad ;)
MrGrakkus 4 months ago
@MrGrakkus lol, you couldn't be further from the truth on that. I'm running an AMD phenom X2 quad core black edition (overclocked) its a great CPU when you look at the price to performance ratio.
Unfortunately I will not be upgrading to the bulldozer due to the fact that AMD promised us a revolutionary processor but actually delivered nothing more than a heap of junk. It can't even beat the performance on last generation processors but it costs the same amount!?
Bulldozer= Epic Fail
TheTrafficker85 4 months ago
@TheTrafficker85 ......i think that they tought about maing it better than some 2 year old prossessor mate..else they werent even alowed to make shit.
MrGrakkus 4 months ago
@MrGrakkus Sorry, your comment didn't really make sense so I'm not sure what you're trying to say.....
TheTrafficker85 4 months ago
@TheTrafficker85 glubradgg....ffw...asegffegegegeggesg,feffaff. Allobdsgs see ?
MrGrakkus 4 months ago
@MrGrakkus I guess that's what people say when they don't have a point to make. Enjoy that sweet piece of junk you're going to buy! :-)
TheTrafficker85 4 months ago
I have it, stock cooler is unbearable LOUD - like a jet f-cking engine !
Raider0001 4 months ago
part two of the video failed to show because they couldn't get the chip to do as bad as they wanted :P
cummings4409 4 months ago 2
if 5.08 is good im jesus
Sarickkk 4 months ago
You said 12mbs of Cache.. its 16 yo.
MrAndrewbud420 4 months ago
remember guys when someone is overpowered weaklings try to destroy him
TOWAERlO 4 months ago
Where's Part two of the failed benchmarks?
jewie27 4 months ago 42
are you still alive? where's the 2nd part?
Geryboy666 4 months ago 8
The New Intel i7-2700k will trash this.
weisheng2009 4 months ago 3
LIAR!
PWAKK 4 months ago
Отстой....
TheCergey777 4 months ago
My 2600k buttfucks this one! :D
intelgigabyte 4 months ago 9
@intelgigabyte HAHAHA REALLY !? i guess so. BUT does the 2600k have a nice box like that? i dont think so hahahaha
garudaeagle3 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte and my 990X buttfucks your 2600k! XD
TheTrafficker85 4 months ago
@TheTrafficker85 Touche! :D
intelgigabyte 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte see what you started with all this talk of buttfucking, now I'm off to go buttfuck my girlfriend!! XD
TheTrafficker85 4 months ago
@TheTrafficker85 Dont forget the lube and post a vid of it on youtube! xD
intelgigabyte 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte lol no it doesent..this vid doesent show anything actually ;)
MrGrakkus 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte 2500k buttfucks this one :D
MrGamer450 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte
FATALITY
keshaz12 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte Does Intel pay you to say this crap? Maybe its really you buttfucking your 2600k..
LordSamuelJ 4 months ago 53
@LordSamuelJ yeah its AMD, nothing to do with intel at all
xxXXsmithsterXXxx 2 months ago
@intelgigabyte buy some icecream
MrJagdtrieb 4 months ago
@intelgigabyte smart fool this is a 8120 now when the 8170 comes out that on par with your 2600k at least talk about the 8150 if your going to compare cpu to cpu that's al least closer in price. you like your 2600k so you running it at stock or did you overclock? Your not saying anything abut what your running except your 2600k give it to you. List what's in your rig also TARD.
blkman0072 4 months ago
where is the part 2?
cummings4409 4 months ago
i thought the advantage of 8 cores was supposed to come out only when running multiple monitors and multicore applications of the future...maybe its just to early for 8 cores??
cummings4409 4 months ago
lol what a piece of crap
SuperSmokingPanda 4 months ago
wow hello Logan!!!!!(L)
r2stik 4 months ago
Are you trying to sell me this bs?
siwini 4 months ago
So where's the game and performance reviews? Its already almost a week. I'm sure you are discovering that the AMD FX-8120 is bottlenecking the HD6990.
lexwalker2 4 months ago
what is the name of that case he is using on that PC
Xboxshqip 4 months ago
@Xboxshqip Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
TheExprima 4 months ago
Doesn't Any one but me see the trend here? Sandy bridge has a GPU built in which aids in performance there are certain calculations better suited for a GPU. Now put a AMD GPU on a Bulldozer what do you get? I however think AMD is an ass for releasing this crap so late. They should have just released the dumb shit and get started with APU with bulldozer right away. And it looks like thye gonna take another century to do that @ which point intel would be miles a head.
ShagonChevalier 4 months ago
This cpu's shit And everyone knows it.
SuperRiguy 4 months ago
@SuperRiguy not entirely tue, this processor does have some strengths.. Ive seen it beat a 2600k in several real world benchmarks, and it is the best for video encoding.. I am going to try one soon and I will review it when I get it
terrac1de 4 months ago
@terrac1de I just got one for a media center build and the FX 8150 does good on video, video software uses as many cores as possible so your sir are correct!
Vargas1349 4 months ago
awesome LOGAN !!
adminmovie 4 months ago
<3 the 8-bit music
mitchellblu3 4 months ago
are you wearing a blazer that doesn't fit you with a black Tshirt with a logo underneath?
penisculatus 4 months ago
Sandy Bridge killer my ass.. Performance that is CLOSE to the i7 960 at stock? Wow AMD... just... wow. I have nothing against AMD (running with AMD Phenom II right now) but for the love of God, stop over-hyping your product when it can't beat a 2010 Intel processor or even your own hex-core. AMD are so far behind and it saddens me. =(
crazy88boss 4 months ago
bulldozer is ok but way to much hype per performance.... barely having with "last gen" i5s = Fail- wait till ivy bridge and get your mind blown
askloglog 4 months ago
Maybe at single-threaded applications, but from everything I've seen the FX series are built for multi-threaded applications and excel at it. It depends on purpose, but I'm watching to see whether from now it goes to worse or better.
PenguinRecordings 4 months ago
for 200$ its not that bad i picked mine up and overclocked it two 4.2 on a zalman fan
timlundberg666 4 months ago
Where's part 2 of the benchmarks
jewie27 4 months ago
I can't believe how hard Intel fanboys are hitting, seriously people with no life. Its about the consumer, not about being fanboys. There will be people who prefer this power at this price, instead of a higher priced Intel. Get over it.
PenguinRecordings 4 months ago
@PenguinRecordings plus a lot of people dont understand that those benchmarks they saw were mainly for gaming with nvidia and intel's chipset. it's really annoying how people see benchmarks and reviews and quickly believe that the processor is garbage lol. they should compare them both are multi-threaded applications and see which cpu maxes out between i5/i7 vs bulldozer.
niwrem1 4 months ago
@niwrem1 My thoughts exactly. Isn't it also possible that the benchmark software is also code-wise not ready to fully utilize AMD's new architecture? If anyone studied the PS3's history, it can be noted that developers struggled to get games running well with the processor because its architecture was vastly different(not bad) . This goes to show that old code with new hardware isn't always going to be a breeze. AMD have always built for the future. They were the first with 64bit as well.
PenguinRecordings 4 months ago
It beats intel in aplications where cpu speeds matters like bf3 and 3d rendering and thats all that matters to me.
All my other programs are fast enough anyway and i wouldn't notice any difference with an i7 anyway
FullFledged2010 4 months ago
No tech update? :(
TortillaGaming 4 months ago
Do a new tech update already...
laxzzzen 4 months ago
if the Bulldozer were a car, it would be classified a lemon, true story!
carlhil2 4 months ago
Wow, the butthurt AMD kids are out in force today!
carlhil2 4 months ago
Wow amd thsi is shit my i5 is better at stock speed Wow my i3 can almost beat this
You know what fucking intell pricks FUCK THEM THIS IS LIKE 4 TIMES LESS THEN THE 960 AT what was it stock speeds and thats one thousand dollers this is 200.. now tell me ? intel fan's HOW YOU FUCKING LIKE ME NOW HOW DO YOU FUCKING LIKE ME NOW BITCH!
playPS3play 4 months ago
@playPS3play wat? i5 2500k is cheaper then 8150 and better
magicdevil09 4 months ago 6