4 watts for a laser is actually quite a lot. A typical powerful laser pointer might be of the order of 500mW. Also, given that the guide laser is 50cm in diameter, it's a significant amount of light power.
@TheChrisJohnny maybe its because i have never witnessed a 4 watt laser in person, technicaly speaking its a class 4 laser so it can do severe damage. but on a scale of all the other lasers on earth its not that powerfull. i was just saying ive seen photos of these setups and expected it to be a 100 watt laser.
@iminyourbasement For A Laser Of This Wavelength, That's Is A Lot. This Laser Is Very Likely DPSS, So It Needs Much More Than 4W Input Of IR To Produce The Orange Wavelength (likely 593nm).
@Basard100 it appears to be an orange laser so the pump diode most likely draws thousands of watts in order to reach the orange wavelength. tiny orange lasers only having a 100 milliwatt output need 10 watts so go figure.
@Blackstar84 Hubble and other space-based telescopes have two advantages: They do not suffer image distortion by atmoshpere and they can see in some wavelengths that the earth's atmosphere block. However, space-based telescopes have smaller mirrors, which gathers less photons to detect very faint objects and have resolution that is diffraction-limited. In fact, the next generation telescopes such as the EELT and TMT will have BETTER resolution than space-based telescopes using adaptive optics.
The VLT may just about be able to resolve a lunar rover when its telescopes are used together in interferometer mode. This mode isn't fully functional yet, and the telescopes are currently being used independently.
@TheTrollKing123 not all stars...some become colder brown dwarfs that just mull about for a long time ....not giving off hardly any light
3tangle3 1 year ago
what an age we live in
robutta100 1 year ago
thats only 4 watts?
iminyourbasement 1 year ago
@iminyourbasement
4 watts for a laser is actually quite a lot. A typical powerful laser pointer might be of the order of 500mW. Also, given that the guide laser is 50cm in diameter, it's a significant amount of light power.
TheChrisJohnny 1 year ago
@TheChrisJohnny maybe its because i have never witnessed a 4 watt laser in person, technicaly speaking its a class 4 laser so it can do severe damage. but on a scale of all the other lasers on earth its not that powerfull. i was just saying ive seen photos of these setups and expected it to be a 100 watt laser.
iminyourbasement 1 year ago
@iminyourbasement For A Laser Of This Wavelength, That's Is A Lot. This Laser Is Very Likely DPSS, So It Needs Much More Than 4W Input Of IR To Produce The Orange Wavelength (likely 593nm).
lXlNismo11lXl 8 months ago
@lXlNismo11lXl i know that i just figured in the photos it was at least 25 watts, it was probably the camera exposure that made it appear brighter.
iminyourbasement 8 months ago
this is the fake star you will see from maitreya to think he is Christ this is just my opinion but i think it will be fact
Forixx777 1 year ago
GOD DAMN SCIENCE IS RAD
y3k23k 1 year ago
This has NWO written all over it
RowlexEnterprise 1 year ago
does it only take 4 watts to generate a 4 watt laser? if so, then why don't we use lasers more in war....
Basard100 2 years ago
@Basard100 it appears to be an orange laser so the pump diode most likely draws thousands of watts in order to reach the orange wavelength. tiny orange lasers only having a 100 milliwatt output need 10 watts so go figure.
iminyourbasement 1 year ago
that is FUCKING awesome...
murf69 2 years ago 2
Better yet when the next astroid comes rolling around just blast it out of the sky.
Sickshot12 2 years ago
Imagine if an airplane flew over that laser.
BOOM.
Sickshot12 2 years ago
Their using it for that Maitreya freak.
SupremeSonofVenus 2 years ago 6
Yes, the NWO have their own false messiah, to serve their global agenda.
SermonAudio 2 years ago
Wow. Some serious brain-power went into that project. That is so cool.
AdidasAssassin 3 years ago
wouldnt it be much easier to just use hubble telescope?
Blackstar84 4 years ago
HST time is in great demand.
The bigger mirrors in ground based telescopes make them better for observing faint objects.
Specialised instruments can easily be fitted to ground telescopes for specific experiments.
BrunoTheQuestionable 4 years ago
@Blackstar84 Hubble and other space-based telescopes have two advantages: They do not suffer image distortion by atmoshpere and they can see in some wavelengths that the earth's atmosphere block. However, space-based telescopes have smaller mirrors, which gathers less photons to detect very faint objects and have resolution that is diffraction-limited. In fact, the next generation telescopes such as the EELT and TMT will have BETTER resolution than space-based telescopes using adaptive optics.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@Blackstar84 It's easier , but much more costly to repair due to having to send someone in to space to repair it.
jsinc1785 1 year ago
I thought these telescopes were supposed to show the lunar rovers!
johnsmdm 5 years ago
The VLT may just about be able to resolve a lunar rover when its telescopes are used together in interferometer mode. This mode isn't fully functional yet, and the telescopes are currently being used independently.
BrunoTheQuestionable 5 years ago