All of the experts are contracted by the U.S. government. The so called experts who work for a magazine are not experts. As a result of 9/11 we now have the Patriot Act that has taken away more civil liberties from Americans then anything in U.S. history. But look through history if you dare. You will find out that this has happened before.
@luvmyctd LMAO and yet there is no proof what so ever that says it was an inside job go on believing your fairy tales cause all you are doing is lying to yourself
Paul Mulawker's claim that he smelled jet fuel and saw plane parts completely flies in the face of the claim made by former Pentagon employee April Gallop, who climbed out of the hole after nearly being killed by the attack. She said she smelled no jet fuel and saw no plane parts during her ordeal.
Clearly someone is lying here, and I'm more inclinded to believe April Gallop cuz she had every reason to be pissed off at nearly being killed.
@ChrisHill991 The primary reason I refuse to believe the official 9/11 story is cuz the laws of physics show that certain things in the official story are impossible. One way to prove a theory is wrong is to show incriminating evidence, but another way is to use science to show an official story is wrong. And certain things about 9/11 violate the laws of physics, like the C-ring hole and the way the towers collapsed. A STORY THAT VIOLATES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS CAN'T POSSIBLY BE TRUE.
@nicpetnic No I don't have a college degree in physics. In fact, I'm currently going to college for a degree in investigative journalism. But since when does someone need a degree in physics to be trusted to explain physics-related science? Physics is just a hobby for me, but that CERTAINLY doesn't mean that I will be wrong whenever I explain physics. If I study it enough in my free time, then I can know it just as well as any physics professor!
@nicpetnic If you are still skeptical of my knowledge of physics, I would like to point out that I do have ASPERGER'S SYNDROME, which is an autistic spectrum disorder that is characterized by poor social skills and the ability to obsess about things at a profound level.
My disorder has caused me social problems, but it has done wonders for enabling me to obsess about things of my choice more deeply. And the 9/11 conspiracies are one of those things I choose to obsess on.
@ChrisHill991 And you believe everything the govt and their shills (like the History channel) tells you about 9/11 because you are too afraid to accept what really happened. 9/11 was an inside job.
@luvmyctd The 9/11 Truth movement is a CIA operation. What better way to have people fear you if they believe you caused one of the biggest crimes in human history? You are a government operative and we are on to you.
Just cuz many people saw the plane fly toward the Pentagon doesn't mean that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Further, if a missile hit the Pentagon while Flight 77 flew over it, then nobody would've noticed the plane fly over the Pentagon cuz all their attention would've been diverted to the damage caused to the Pentagon. It's the same principle as an optical illusion. You can't see what your mind isn't focused on even if it is right in front of you. Pentagon attack is a case in point.
Funny how The history channel sets this up "Experts vs. Theorists". That's very inaccurate because experts around the world that don't have anything to gain or loose have found the Pentagon and the Two Towers official explanation to be lacking at best and by no means reflect the actual scientific evidence.
Being a sandwich maker at Subways, I am of the opinion that the WTC bldgs that were destroyed was an inside job! I proved it by making a 12 inch roast beef sub with extra, extra mayonaise. If you hold up the sub vertically and squeese the top, the mayo will gush out the middle and the bottom just like the bombs going off in the WTC bldgs.
There....Finally proof positive it was an inside job!!!!
No need to thank me, I am very humble and proud of that fact!!!!
@caching60098 Watch "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" (watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=FLi_7wKna_gN4olVjz6fTxWA&feature=mh_lolz) ... see if that doesn't rattle your brain enough to do some actual research into what really happened on 9/11.
@luvmyctd It's quite obvious this video you linked was produced by the US Government. The entire 9/11 Truth movement is a CIA operation. The government failed to protect it's citizens due to incompetence on 9/11 and is now trying to hide the truth by pretending they caused it. This will cause fear and fear can be used to control the people they failed. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
luvmyctd you are a CIA operative and we are on to you. WE WILL NOT SWALLOW YOUR GOVERNMENT LIES!
So let me get this correct, you "truthers" are saying that the only logical explanation for these events on 9/11 are that the U.S. Government planed and carry out attacks on its' own buildings and killed thousands of its' own citizens in order to start a war in the middle east for oil. If y'all think that the Government of the country that you are living in is committing genocide for oil money, why do y'all still live here. Move to Europe and stop this cruel game.
So let me get this correct, you "truthers" are saying that the only logical explanation for these events on 9/11 are that the U.S. Government planed and carry out attacks on its' own buildings and killed thousands of its' own citizens in order to start a war in the middle east for oil. If y'all think that the Government of the country that you are living in is committing genocide for oil money, why do y'all still live here. Move to Europe and stop this cruel game.
Denying that the plane hit the Pentagon is disrespecting for families of all the people who died on that plane. It's not only incredibly stupid, but also incredibly insulting.
If you stop this video at just the right moment at the 3:10 mark, you can see the front of the cruise missile that hits the boat. Why do I bring this up? Well, on the youtube video titled '9/11 Pentagon Attack: A Closer Look' you can see a similar looking object coming out of the right side of the screen (which is actually the subject of that video). Hmmm, maybe something worth investigating?
Seeing as how the WTC and Pentagon were built with totally different construction materials, totally different architectural designs, 30 years apart? Have you really thought this out? ;)
ALERT !! GO Type AE911TRUTH & listen to thousands of EXPERT structural engineers,architects ,chemical engineers,demolition experts,scientists ect.... They speak of FACTS /EVIDENCE !! The 911report IS theory not science , fact or evidence. There is no evidence/science to back NIST/Gov report. AE911 Experts use evidence/science NOT theory like the NIST/911 report did. FACT !!
@Headshothorror4488 AETruth911 has no facts. They only have a series of bullshit lies and manipulated statements and videos in a sad attempt at pushing their own agenda. AE911Truth are not "experts" they are a group of lying assholes that have no fucking idea what they are talking about. Just quoting AETruth shows how ignorant someone is. Truthers are fucking retarded idiots. FACT!!
I guess Popular Mech. editors think becuase they publish a low rent magazine, they somehow qualify as experts.
They will have to utilize cartoons to pull of this hoax of debunking conspiracy theories.
Proof is in the videos my friends. No video of the Pentagon being struck by any aircraft that day, is conclusive proof that the official version is a lie. No Boieng 767, no ticky no laundry. We dont have to prove that it didnt. The gov. has to show the video evidence that it did.
@NowKillYourself Its amazing that theres not one video to back up these [liers/bought & paid for] especially Mike Walters . You could see that he was lying all the way through his constantly changing testimony. He stated that he observed a 500 mph 757going by his windshield and he even saw the AA on the tail of the aircraft. Funny he never mentions the deafening sound of twin jet engines roaring by at 500 mph. Funny he never mentions the taxi cab being struck by the light pole, funny?
@NowKillYourself Why is it that the pentagon officials refuse to show the video evidence to prove this Boeing 757 theory? Why is it that theres no debris field on the manicured lawn of the pentagon? Why are there no engines found? Why are there no bodies found at all? Why is there no seats, and tail section of flight 77? Wheres the black box, and why hasnt the NTSB demanded the black box to be brought forward for study? Did you see what happen sir? Ah,, yeah I did, dont look ethel!
"They expect when a plane hits it punches cartoon like holes in the wall, that just doesnt happen." WTF are you talking about the WTC got cartoon like holes punched in it wheres the pentagons holes?
@racinggreg2011 Yet, you listen to a group of conspiracy theorists who with all of their bold claims cannot formulate anything close to substantial evidence that proves that the United States attacked its own people. They base all of their claims on engineering, and use any sort of information to make a grotesque attempt at making a case for a conspiracy. Where are these folks now? Making money off of people who believe their theories. They have an agenda-remember that.
@Kiriakos1991 There is an agenda alright. To tell the people of the world that 9/11 was without any doubt, an inside job. The theory yet to be proven is the one that states that box cutter terrorists controlled by Bin Laden conducted an elaborate sceme of mass proportions with amazing logistics coordination, and without any real capability to fly even a Cessna single engine, these partying terrorists all take over jet airliners and find thier way to the pentagon with any ability to contd.
@kreepeemann I like how you can't disprove anything I say. You keep using the same word "fuckhead" maybe you should expand your vocabulary and get a real education.
@kreepeemann How about you believe what you wanna believe and I keep my own believes simple huh? For me this video doesn't disprove anything, only fuels me with disappointment that people like you still are blind to the truth.
@fizwizx If I were a family member of one the victims, I would want to kick your ass. You are doing a great disservice to them by believing something one of your fellow assholes thought up on a whim. You can't even define the word "truth" without a dictionary, can you? I thought not. Now get your head out of your ass, son.
@kreepeemann I'm sorry that you believe this shit so much that you are getting angry over nothing. Just because someone disproves your believes you attack them for it. Grow up and learn to respect others.
@fizwizx The only thing you are proving is that your ability to reason is as fucked up as your use of the English language. Why should I respect an ignorant little turd such as yourself? Read a book and get your GED, douchebag.
@kreepeemann at least he's giving explanations behind his beliefs if he's so wrong y don't u and the rest of those dumbasses on here give us explanations that are scientific and really answer our questions cause so far we're asking questions that no one wants to answer
@racinggreg2011 Listen you fucking cretin, this film does the very thing you seem so desirous for: explains, clearly and concisely the refutations of your idiotic theories. The problem is you are a hyperactive asshole, raised by stupid fucking liberals, and you can't pay attention long enough to hear it! Ha Ha! You suck cocks!
lol..they cant explain.. the pentagon collapse with any sense other that.~ yeah ..that the way planes collapse.. but fact is planes have 2 wings..and none of them were found.. neither their marks on the building. neither their engines were found. Wake people.........
watch this ... copy/paste this on youtube search
Former FBI Chief says 9/11 was inside job
pjIpJRntMLQ
American Intelligence General Says 911 was a fraud
Just because the History Channel makes a show about this doesn't mean it isn't worth investigating. All I have seen so far is a bunch of "Experts" vs "Conspiracy Theorist". Labeling anyone who questions something as "Conspiracy Theorist" or "truthers" allows others to easily dismiss them. Google "experts investigating 9/11" and you will find countless experts who agree something is wrong. Now here is the problem, can you call the experts conspiracy theorist? TV is not an answer ;)
@AlexanderTheGood89 Never said it would. But when I was 18 I remember watching TV when this happened. I remember years later reading building 7 fell.. What? That was the beginning. I read more than watch and take in both sides. But here we go again with trying to "label" someone lol. "You just watch online videos and google your research". But I don't, so whats next?
Well, okay then. Could you name one of those "countless experts who agree something is wrong" other than the frankly frightning and bizarre not to mention grossly overstated 1,500 architect-engineer petition list floating around? That's right. Name one expert--one, any, one, person--who agrees something is wrong and has had their doubts published in a peer reviewed article.
Steven E. Jones. Now instead of trying to call me out, go email him and hear what he has to say. I'm sure he would love to hear what you have to say on this matter.
I'd love to e-mail Mr. Jones and hear what he has to say as well. I consider myself a very open-minded person. However, you never answered my question. Jones's appraisals of what happened on 9/11 are not peer reviewed as he was placed on paid leave from his University and retired in 2006. The peer review proccess is tough and precise. In fact, many people left Bentham after being associated with Jones's paper as a reviewer AFTER it was published. Now that is not a thorough peer review.
The Department Head of BYU is one record saying, "I think without exception, the structural engineering professors in our department are NOT in agreement with the claims made by Jones in his paper, and they don't think there is accuracy and validity to these claims." The BYU Physics Dept. agrees: "Jones' department and college administrators are NOT convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."
Steven E. Jones has a degree in physics as it relates to the book of Mormon. Prior to tackling the issue of 9.11, he wrote a paper titled "Behold My Hands," which argues that Jesus Christ visited, interacted with, and was artistically represented, by the ancient Mayans--"A crazy idea, maybe - but wait till you see the artwork of the ancient Maya! (directly quoted)." Do you believe in this idea? Probably not. But his system of analysis is exactly the same in both cases.
@anthe What would you call them than? They believe that the U.S government had an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons;(dictionary) and have a theory about how they conducted said plan. Conspiracy+Theorist=Conspiracy Theorist.
@Rainergunvikes No, not exactly. While I think we can both agree that some people believe they had an "evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan", others just simple believe something is wrong with the reports and twisted media. I don't believe the report 100%, I don't think they are "evil" or whatever and I'm also not a conspiracy theorist. So how would you label me? The way I do is that my name is Justin, I use my brain and search for truth instead of being spoon feed it.
@Rainergunvikes Also, if you did your research then you probably had at least one thought of "oh, that is questionable". Nothing is wrong with that, your just using your mind. Labeling is becoming ignorant and unstable. As soon as someone questions something people yell "conspiracy theorist!" and dismiss you. Questioning is good and should be promoted, if it gets out of control, like what your saying, then yea, not cool. But we should do it with 9/11 and among other things.
The WTC was built in the 70's and thus full of the deadly asbestos. In some sick and twisted reasoning false flag terrorism and double insurrance policies was more profitable then conventional renovation. Red White & Blue bumper stickers helped fuel the war machine. My heart goes out to all those suffering from Ground Zero Disease.
Something very confusing and disturbing is the constant ad hominem attacks by popular mechanics on the conspiracy theorists. By saying "this is how 'they' work", "they expect a cartoon cutout of the plane", "they love to pick and choose information". Im not saying which side i support but i dont hear conspiracy theorists saying "those guys at popular mechanics are bush supporters and have hidden evidence to support their point." Just speaks of uncertainty within popular mechanics' conclusion.
@Disembowelment You don't? Shit, every single debate I've ever had with a Truther descends into them screaming "WHO DO YOU WORK FOR!? WHO PAID YOU? WAS IT THE JOOOOOOS!?"
@Halo4Lyf I dont experience the same hostility myself. My statement was solely based on the information presented in this video. All I was saying was the ad hominem attacks are clear logical fallacies in their argumentation and that with the use of those fallacies it just weakens their points. I dont think that people need to become angry and hostile while arguing this stuff, while a lot of it is frustrating for both parties, nothing is achieved through aggression.
Governments history=so many crimes & lies;CIA's Op:MK-ULTRA, Operation Ajax (1953 overthrow of Iran),Op Northwoods,JFK & Warren Commission Rport,Gulf of Tonkin lie, Watergate, Iran-Contra Scandal, Iraq-Gate,lies of Iraqi soldiers throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators to die(Gulf war),Oklahoma City Bombing cover-up,then after 9/11 comes the PATRIOT Act,domestic spying,extraordinary renditioning,torture,fraudulent elections,lies leadin us into Iraq,yet we're expected to believe this shit
Why is it that all experts confirm the reality and it's only paranoid individuals who claim this was faked. Government has lied in the past and will lie again in the future it doesn't mean that what we all saw didn't happen. So all government officials and experts hired to investigate 911 are all lying? All experts at popular mechanics are lying too? What about all other experts around the Country, are they just not speaking out or are they in on it too?
What about the people who lost their lives on that plane that hit the Pentagon? The confirmed accounts by family members? A 757 hit the Pentagon, not a missile. People saw a plane hit the Pentagon. My God, people these days question every thing they don't like! We were attacked! There are some in this world that don't like you just for living in America. Sad, but true. You accept the Holocaust, but deny terrorism. Some logic.
@Kiriakos1991 They're like creationists. They only need the slightest bit of evidence to believe it, but they won't accept evolution until they get 200% proof.
@svendiamond - I agree but I never use this example as most Americans do believe creationism. It is better to use the example of a "cargo cult" or those that think aliens create crop circles. No matter what evidence is presented they refuse to accept it.
What they do not realize is these theories are used to recruit in the middles east. So these Americans are actually support a theory that help to recruit terrorists to come and kill westerners. They are aiding the enemy.
@Kiriakos1991 what about that small hole that was seen in the pentagon a 757 would have destroyed most of the wall and how come there's no evidence of the plane when it's proven that the metal they use to make turbines by plane couldn't possibly be burned by jet fuel alone all facts
@racinggreg2011 That still does not answer the question: then where is 757? Where are the passengers? The loved ones who were never heard from again? You're saying that the grieving families are mourning for nothing. So basically the U.S. government would attack its own central defense building, possibly killing high-ranking officials, to start a war. It's too far-fetched and there is no proof whatsoever. This whole 9/11 conspiracy came out of liberal hatred for Bush.
@Kiriakos1991 what about that small hole that was seen in the pentagon a 757 would have destroyed most of the wall and how come there's no evidence of the plane when it's proven that the metal they use to make turbines by plane couldn't possibly be burned by jet fuel alone all facts
@racinggreg2011 I mean, how can you discredit the eyewitness accounts and testimonies of so many people who saw, heard, or took part in the events of that day? People in New York City who saw planes hit the two towers of the World Trade Center. The passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 who fought with the four hijackers for control of the plane and brought it down(that plane was rumored to hit the White House). The first responders at Ground Zero.
@Kiriakos1991 Terrorists that couldnt fly let alone navigate a Boeing 757, and manage to find thier way at 30,000 feet back to the pentagon and complete a turn that only a experienced fighter pilot could perform on a good day. Face it, they blew on 9/11 and the American public is waking up to that fact. Theres no proof that anything other than a missle hit the pentagon. Build. #7 was pulled in demolition, and the WTC was hit with very sohisticated weaponry, with faked video/media tech.
@MagnumPI4 Sorry pal, they were learning the basics in a Cessna single prop engine 4 seater aircraft. So your saying they hopped up into the cockpit of a 757 Boeing passenger airliner, with controls display that the boxcutter terrorists couldnt even comprehend let alone ever scene before in thier lives. Then somehow managed to turn these aircraft around and fly them at 500 mph back to thier targets, and somehow they knew how to turn off the transponder. Now thats a conspiracy theory.
@paskettle well im doubly sorry because they did a pretty good job of low altitude flying to hit the world trade centers. and there is definite proof of that. Im sure u have some crack pot theory though, right hero?
@MagnumPI4 Yes sir, could you please show me the video tape of these box cutter terrorist in the cockpit, or perhaps the blackbox recordings maybe?
I'll never buy that so called terrorists flew 757's into anything, not even a large empty field. these guys couldnt even handle Cessna's in sunny florida. It boggles the mind to imagine how.
I would settle for a photoshop xerox copy with cartoon figures if you need to. I am prepared to wait till Hell freezes over if necessary sir.
@Kiriakos1991 Well thousands of expert structural engineers,architects,demolition experts,scientists ect.... use science and have evidence of a demolition of some sort, the 911 report IS a theory !! That is a FACT !! They use no science and guess/assume, in a court of law they would lose and AE911TRUTH Experts would win cause they have the forensics and science. Yes jets hit but buildings could NOT fall like they did without every beam going simultaneously, IMPOSSABLE without demo
@Kiriakos1991 It is wrong to assume that a plane hit the Pentagon just cuz numerous people claim they saw it hit the Pentagon. The truthers' claim that the plane flew over the Pentagon while a missile simultaneously hit it is actually very plausible. Nobody saw the plane fly over the Pentagon b/c their brains made them think that the plane hit it. Human eyes don't see things that their minds aren't focused on. Any magician or optical illusion expert could tell u this. Same principle here.
This video proves that there's a cover up. Thank you History [sic] Channel. The stupidest "expert" debunking explanations I've heard so far. What a sick joke to suggest that everything happened as the "official story" says.
@roberlucas well, can you prove it happened otherwise? Every little detail the conspiracy theorists point out are debunked. If you're so smart, why dont you try refuting them.
I just love how every 'conspiracy theory' raised is followed by an 'expert response' - a magazine editor. How about the multiple conflicting timelines presented to the commission by *both* FAA and NORAD? Langley scrambled in response to a 'phantom' AA11 flight - not 77 (that hit the pentagon) - and the fact that no one is held accountable for lying either in Sept '01, days after, or May/July of '04? (when questioned by the commission) or both, is worthy of a lifted eyebrow...just sayin.
"only a missile of US armed forces could enter pentagon's airspace without getting shot down."
That's the dumbest shit i've ever heard. If you go on google map and find the pentagon. You can see that there is an airport just a little bit to the south-east. If the airspace of the pentagon is restricted, why the hell would they build an airport there?
After finding out the truth, or the truth Big Brother told, Wilson found out his desire to seek out the truth cost him everything. So after severe torture for who know how long, the only thing he desired was to not know the truth, and accept the reality of the present situation. People state evidence, but if there was a massive plot, and it was meticulously planned out, then phat chance in finding a smoking bullet. I’ve seen enough to know that I have seen enough. Gulf of Tonkin, read about it..
@Fussinated WTC left acres of deris . . . that's not falling on it's own footprint. Here's my big question, "how did they prepare three buildings for demolition in a matter of days, when it takes weeks (if not months) to rig a building 1/4 the size of one tower?"
oh man this video is really pissin me off. i don't know if I've got the energy, they have tried to make this look like its a fair back and forth when its not you know what experts explain in an expert manner why was there molten steel [like lava] melted metal pouring out the broken walls of the north and south tower. huh history channel. popular mechanics please will you explain to me how a fortified building like building 7 could collapse symmetrically when it by report had asymmetrical damage.
@Fantacyshroom Fortified? Building 7 was the complete opposite of fortified. It's bottom was completely hollow. If you bothered to watch all the parts you would know that since they explain it later on.
@strongman325 why in the hell was it hollow what are you saying that there was a chance of that building, falling at any moment.are you serious. people are rotten, money corrupts examples rage and scream through out history. blunt protruding truth how in the hell is it so unbelievable that people are capable of terrible things which incorporate lies. i have nothing to gain from what i say i lose everyday sleep, time,and tons of energy doing this back and forth. they gain from what they say.
@Fantacyshroom You're stupid, hollow as in it was supported by steel beams, like a regular skyscraper, rather it had a few trusses which held it up just fine, but when the debris from the towers hit the building it took out a large part of Building 7's bottom. I don't gain from what I say either, just because you don't gain anything doesn't make you right lol.
@strongman325 find me one, one......just one picture or video just one where there is a large piece of the building missing. and i will shut up and bow out.
this is the History channel, it's own by the mainstream media of course they are defending the Government
fact: they found Mohamed Atta's passport in 2 feet of debris less than 24 hours later
ok what was the paper made out of that pass through the fire ball without bursting into flames?? what ? the passport made out of composite material?( carbon fibers & tungsten threat?) i don't thing so
Only in your paranoia. The media is not controllef because they make more money by not being controlled. Aint you worked that out? If any newspaper found real evidence of a 9/11 conspiracy, they would publish and make a fortune.
Something you should realise. You are stupid. For you, normal life is way out of your depth. You seriously believe that somebody could organise a conspiracy of this magnitude, involving thousands of people, and not get cought? You fool.
lol, what they fail to mention is that a c130 is incapable of carrying missiles, like literally impossible. It doesn't have any firing systems because its a damn cargo plane
@Filthdrive Let me help you out since you're in dire need of it. When you make a wild assertion, back it up with FACTS! You still have nothing. "Everybody's a liar" is the essence of what you are saying. You have no hard facts - Just broad theories, distractions and look-over-here's. Stay in school.
@SupportAZ go find the facts that i found, dont ask me to prove it, i went through so much to find out and to think for myself.... just because you dont have the capability to think for yourself and find facts that lead to a BIGGER COMPLEX PICTURE because thats what its all about A BIGGER AND COMPLEX PICTURE it's not about black n white anymore, the black n white was made to fool sheep like you, DIVIDE AND CONQUER like a game of chess. STAY OUT OF SCHOOL. because you are being BRAINWASHED.
@texasdurp dont trust the History channel, especially when theyre fuckin manistream, wtf do u expect, wheres your brains dude? dont u have the capability to think?
@Filthdrive If the media is controlled as you believe, how did they uncover the Watergate conspiracy, Oliver North and arming the Contra and of course Clinton getting sucked off by Monica Lewinski? Oh yeah, you forgot about all that. Doh!
@SvenTviking wtf are u talking about? if the media is owned and controlled and everything established is owned and controlled??...... try and work out how things all come together fall apart and how things work in the world and have worked since the beginning of civilization.....
When you have facts, all the conspirators can do is just yell...."you must be lying". Try to refute what they are saying with actual evidence, not a bunch of made of crap like 9/11 coincidences, September clues and Loose Change which are nothing more than a bunch of doctored video (proven), video cut short just before the proof (proven) or just a bunch of made up shit.
@vaughnjb, Yeah. Try watching ZERO: An Investigation of 9/11
It was made by a novel prize winner! It does a much better job than previous 9/11 conspiracy documentaries. You can also watch the videos on my channel. They are some of the best, most hard-hitting films I could find on the subject. I also source all of the facts in the description so people can go do their own research.
LIES. LIES. LIES. I love how they say "Conspiracy Theory" and "Experts Response" Though there are "Experts" who say the complete opposite of what the History Channel "Experts" claim. (Who were all hired directly by the government to investigate)
Popular Mechanics never gonna said it was an inside job, and the "experts" are no different from those of the government. remember that sounding like you're saying the truth, doesn't mean you're really saying it. i have many reason to believe that it was an inside job, and now that th U.S government have found out that Afghanistan has a gold mine of minerals, including gold, i started to doubt that they just made this discovery. i think they knew all thins minerals were there all along..
webster tarply is an idoit. He has never done any scholarlly work at all he is a misinformation rtard making money off the parinoid. Celente is telling people to prepare and to take care of themselves nothing wrong with that.Now alex you have done good things like helping joe capanna, exposing the credit dertives and obama's love affair with wall st and goldman. But, this is a bridge too far.
There are too CGI animations of the plane hitting pentagon. But one is very different from the other. While the first shows the plane with wing in diagonal, and in a high angle descennding, the other show the plane in a more even flying, going in a very low altitude.
has anyone else ever seen this c130 pilots account before this?i dont recall ever hearing his story,i mean that is a major part of the story if he were there & to me that seems to have been left out
If you really pay attention to this video, it looks like the guys from loose change ares seriously asking questions, and the "experts" aren't actually answering those questions. Instead we see them answering around the question, like many politicians.
I'm not saying that 911 is an inside job, but because of the these "experts" are answering i'm no suspicious.
there were alot of videos taken by the government that show what hit the pentagon. there is no way the few frames they released is acceptable where security is tightest in the world. i'm not saying a plane didn't hit, i'm saying they have a better video (probably several) so why would that not be released. videos of the wtc were not supressed like this. if the government is lying about this then what else? who is the video really evidence against? a muslim or someone else?
Filthdrive's "smoking gun" is still just a broad theory. LOL. No facts. Reminds me of Johnny Cochran saying "Well Nicole did drugs therefore she must have been killed by drug dealers". When you have nothing, just start swinging for the fences and hopefully something will stick. "The History Channel is a bunch of liars". LOL. Why don't you address the facts like the fact that steel loses HALF it's strength at 1,000 degrees -- or maybe you can challenge the laws of the universe. LOL.
So on one hand you are saying that the building could have collapsed naturally from fire weakening the steel, and not made any "VERY LOUD SOUND"(s)
Yet, on the other hand, you make every excuse in the universe for why Nanothermite could not have been used to achieve the same (or similar) effect at a controlled and accelerated rate???
Just to be clear, could you confirm that this is YOUR LOGIC? Debunkers are idiots who contradict themselves.
the HISTORY channel is a corporations like all other large corporations which are "OWNED" by these elites... who runt eh fucking world you stupid ignorant clones stop suck each others cocks and wake the fuck up and learn and observe information FOR YOURSELF!! think for yourself!!!
All of the experts are contracted by the U.S. government. The so called experts who work for a magazine are not experts. As a result of 9/11 we now have the Patriot Act that has taken away more civil liberties from Americans then anything in U.S. history. But look through history if you dare. You will find out that this has happened before.
stjohnsmanor 1 week ago
History channel propoganda bullshit. There can't be anybody STILL out there that doesn't now know that 9/11 is a lie.
9/11 was a false flag ... period. Building 7.
luvmyctd 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@luvmyctd LMAO and yet there is no proof what so ever that says it was an inside job go on believing your fairy tales cause all you are doing is lying to yourself
ChrisHill991 2 months ago
@luvmyctd yeah, and pigs can fly too but the US government is restraining it back. Trust me, dude! George Bush is an alien.
dw1992 1 month ago
Paul Mulawker's claim that he smelled jet fuel and saw plane parts completely flies in the face of the claim made by former Pentagon employee April Gallop, who climbed out of the hole after nearly being killed by the attack. She said she smelled no jet fuel and saw no plane parts during her ordeal.
Clearly someone is lying here, and I'm more inclinded to believe April Gallop cuz she had every reason to be pissed off at nearly being killed.
fanof2012 3 months ago
@fanof2012 You belive her because her claims supports your dumbass theory. Get over we were attacked by Bin Laden and not the goverment
ChrisHill991 3 months ago
@ChrisHill991 The primary reason I refuse to believe the official 9/11 story is cuz the laws of physics show that certain things in the official story are impossible. One way to prove a theory is wrong is to show incriminating evidence, but another way is to use science to show an official story is wrong. And certain things about 9/11 violate the laws of physics, like the C-ring hole and the way the towers collapsed. A STORY THAT VIOLATES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS CAN'T POSSIBLY BE TRUE.
fanof2012 3 months ago
@fanof2012
Do you have a college degree in physics?
nicpetnic 3 months ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
@nicpetnic No I don't have a college degree in physics. In fact, I'm currently going to college for a degree in investigative journalism. But since when does someone need a degree in physics to be trusted to explain physics-related science? Physics is just a hobby for me, but that CERTAINLY doesn't mean that I will be wrong whenever I explain physics. If I study it enough in my free time, then I can know it just as well as any physics professor!
fanof2012 3 months ago
@nicpetnic If you are still skeptical of my knowledge of physics, I would like to point out that I do have ASPERGER'S SYNDROME, which is an autistic spectrum disorder that is characterized by poor social skills and the ability to obsess about things at a profound level.
My disorder has caused me social problems, but it has done wonders for enabling me to obsess about things of my choice more deeply. And the 9/11 conspiracies are one of those things I choose to obsess on.
fanof2012 3 months ago
@ChrisHill991 And you believe everything the govt and their shills (like the History channel) tells you about 9/11 because you are too afraid to accept what really happened. 9/11 was an inside job.
luvmyctd 2 months ago
@luvmyctd The 9/11 Truth movement is a CIA operation. What better way to have people fear you if they believe you caused one of the biggest crimes in human history? You are a government operative and we are on to you.
pantspoopie 2 weeks ago
Just cuz many people saw the plane fly toward the Pentagon doesn't mean that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Further, if a missile hit the Pentagon while Flight 77 flew over it, then nobody would've noticed the plane fly over the Pentagon cuz all their attention would've been diverted to the damage caused to the Pentagon. It's the same principle as an optical illusion. You can't see what your mind isn't focused on even if it is right in front of you. Pentagon attack is a case in point.
fanof2012 4 months ago
Funny how The history channel sets this up "Experts vs. Theorists". That's very inaccurate because experts around the world that don't have anything to gain or loose have found the Pentagon and the Two Towers official explanation to be lacking at best and by no means reflect the actual scientific evidence.
Templar2k2k 4 months ago
How does a plane hit that exact spot?!? Aerospace technology, the same technology they use to fuel a stealth jet mid air.DER
JN5B11 4 months ago
I can't find part 5. I typed the whole name: History Channel - 9/11 Myths part 5 and still nothing :(
KissofDawn2012 4 months ago
Being a sandwich maker at Subways, I am of the opinion that the WTC bldgs that were destroyed was an inside job! I proved it by making a 12 inch roast beef sub with extra, extra mayonaise. If you hold up the sub vertically and squeese the top, the mayo will gush out the middle and the bottom just like the bombs going off in the WTC bldgs.
There....Finally proof positive it was an inside job!!!!
No need to thank me, I am very humble and proud of that fact!!!!
caching60098 4 months ago
@caching60098 Watch "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" (watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=FLi_7wKna_gN4olVjz6fTxWA&feature=mh_lolz) ... see if that doesn't rattle your brain enough to do some actual research into what really happened on 9/11.
luvmyctd 2 months ago
SCIENTISTS, PHYSICISTS & DEMOLITION EXPERTS
VS.
VARIOUS UNQUALIFIED AND UNINFORMED PEOPLE
... FIGHT!
4anythingelse 4 months ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
@4anythingelse I agree completely!
"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" (watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=FLi_7wKna_gN4olVjz6fTxWA&feature=mh_lolz)
luvmyctd 2 months ago
@luvmyctd It's quite obvious this video you linked was produced by the US Government. The entire 9/11 Truth movement is a CIA operation. The government failed to protect it's citizens due to incompetence on 9/11 and is now trying to hide the truth by pretending they caused it. This will cause fear and fear can be used to control the people they failed. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
luvmyctd you are a CIA operative and we are on to you. WE WILL NOT SWALLOW YOUR GOVERNMENT LIES!
pantspoopie 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So let me get this correct, you "truthers" are saying that the only logical explanation for these events on 9/11 are that the U.S. Government planed and carry out attacks on its' own buildings and killed thousands of its' own citizens in order to start a war in the middle east for oil. If y'all think that the Government of the country that you are living in is committing genocide for oil money, why do y'all still live here. Move to Europe and stop this cruel game.
hardrockernol9 4 months ago
So let me get this correct, you "truthers" are saying that the only logical explanation for these events on 9/11 are that the U.S. Government planed and carry out attacks on its' own buildings and killed thousands of its' own citizens in order to start a war in the middle east for oil. If y'all think that the Government of the country that you are living in is committing genocide for oil money, why do y'all still live here. Move to Europe and stop this cruel game.
hardrockernol9 4 months ago
Denying that the plane hit the Pentagon is disrespecting for families of all the people who died on that plane. It's not only incredibly stupid, but also incredibly insulting.
Kuba022 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kuba022 /watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
/watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk
/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k
/watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA
/watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
If you stop this video at just the right moment at the 3:10 mark, you can see the front of the cruise missile that hits the boat. Why do I bring this up? Well, on the youtube video titled '9/11 Pentagon Attack: A Closer Look' you can see a similar looking object coming out of the right side of the screen (which is actually the subject of that video). Hmmm, maybe something worth investigating?
fanof2012 5 months ago
so the planes that hit the WTC buildings will leave an overall imprint of the plane(including wings) but not the pentagon?????
jchavez11487 5 months ago
@jchavez11487 They're 2 completely different buildings.
undernorm 5 months ago
@jchavez11487
Seeing as how the WTC and Pentagon were built with totally different construction materials, totally different architectural designs, 30 years apart? Have you really thought this out? ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
truthers DEPUNKED...get a life J.O's, you people are beyond reason and are complete frauds....you lose
mherrenschmidt 5 months ago
wow was that stupid becuz if they killed the ppl inside the tower they pretty much killing themselves and they r stupid
simsarethebest925456 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALERT !! GO Type AE911TRUTH & listen to thousands of EXPERT structural engineers,architects ,chemical engineers,demolition experts,scientists ect.... They speak of FACTS /EVIDENCE !! The 911report IS theory not science , fact or evidence. There is no evidence/science to back NIST/Gov report. AE911 Experts use evidence/science NOT theory like the NIST/911 report did. FACT !!
Headshothorror4488 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Headshothorror4488 AETruth911 has no facts. They only have a series of bullshit lies and manipulated statements and videos in a sad attempt at pushing their own agenda. AE911Truth are not "experts" they are a group of lying assholes that have no fucking idea what they are talking about. Just quoting AETruth shows how ignorant someone is. Truthers are fucking retarded idiots. FACT!!
12weasel100 6 months ago
K planes wings get shredded off or fell off, why would you not find wing parts, are they saying they were shattered finitely
IAMME857 6 months ago
I guess Popular Mech. editors think becuase they publish a low rent magazine, they somehow qualify as experts.
They will have to utilize cartoons to pull of this hoax of debunking conspiracy theories.
Proof is in the videos my friends. No video of the Pentagon being struck by any aircraft that day, is conclusive proof that the official version is a lie. No Boieng 767, no ticky no laundry. We dont have to prove that it didnt. The gov. has to show the video evidence that it did.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle There are 136 eye witnesses that say they saw a commercial jet strike the Pentagon.
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself Its amazing that theres not one video to back up these [liers/bought & paid for] especially Mike Walters . You could see that he was lying all the way through his constantly changing testimony. He stated that he observed a 500 mph 757going by his windshield and he even saw the AA on the tail of the aircraft. Funny he never mentions the deafening sound of twin jet engines roaring by at 500 mph. Funny he never mentions the taxi cab being struck by the light pole, funny?
paskettle 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself Why is it that the pentagon officials refuse to show the video evidence to prove this Boeing 757 theory? Why is it that theres no debris field on the manicured lawn of the pentagon? Why are there no engines found? Why are there no bodies found at all? Why is there no seats, and tail section of flight 77? Wheres the black box, and why hasnt the NTSB demanded the black box to be brought forward for study? Did you see what happen sir? Ah,, yeah I did, dont look ethel!
paskettle 7 months ago
"They expect when a plane hits it punches cartoon like holes in the wall, that just doesnt happen." WTF are you talking about the WTC got cartoon like holes punched in it wheres the pentagons holes?
TylerTheT 7 months ago
@TylerTheT If you think the WTC looked like cartoon holes, then you didn't watch enough Wile E Coyote.
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself Lol you know what I meant :P I hope..
TylerTheT 7 months ago
@racinggreg2011 Yet, you listen to a group of conspiracy theorists who with all of their bold claims cannot formulate anything close to substantial evidence that proves that the United States attacked its own people. They base all of their claims on engineering, and use any sort of information to make a grotesque attempt at making a case for a conspiracy. Where are these folks now? Making money off of people who believe their theories. They have an agenda-remember that.
Kiriakos1991 7 months ago
@Kiriakos1991 There is an agenda alright. To tell the people of the world that 9/11 was without any doubt, an inside job. The theory yet to be proven is the one that states that box cutter terrorists controlled by Bin Laden conducted an elaborate sceme of mass proportions with amazing logistics coordination, and without any real capability to fly even a Cessna single engine, these partying terrorists all take over jet airliners and find thier way to the pentagon with any ability to contd.
paskettle 7 months ago
This video is propaganda and an extended version of the lie.
fizwizx 8 months ago
@fizwizx And you, sir, are a fuckhead.
kreepeemann 8 months ago
@kreepeemann How so?
fizwizx 8 months ago
@fizwizx Your conclusions cry out: "Hey everyone! I'm a fuckhead!"
kreepeemann 8 months ago
@kreepeemann I like how you can't disprove anything I say. You keep using the same word "fuckhead" maybe you should expand your vocabulary and get a real education.
fizwizx 8 months ago
@fizwizx The entire video disproves everything you say, you empty headed stooge.
kreepeemann 8 months ago
@kreepeemann How about you believe what you wanna believe and I keep my own believes simple huh? For me this video doesn't disprove anything, only fuels me with disappointment that people like you still are blind to the truth.
fizwizx 8 months ago
@fizwizx If I were a family member of one the victims, I would want to kick your ass. You are doing a great disservice to them by believing something one of your fellow assholes thought up on a whim. You can't even define the word "truth" without a dictionary, can you? I thought not. Now get your head out of your ass, son.
kreepeemann 8 months ago
@kreepeemann I'm sorry that you believe this shit so much that you are getting angry over nothing. Just because someone disproves your believes you attack them for it. Grow up and learn to respect others.
fizwizx 8 months ago
@fizwizx The only thing you are proving is that your ability to reason is as fucked up as your use of the English language. Why should I respect an ignorant little turd such as yourself? Read a book and get your GED, douchebag.
kreepeemann 8 months ago
@kreepeemann I am talking to a child. Grow up. Or do you want to cry some more? Come here I'll give you a shoulder to cry on its ok baby ;(
fizwizx 8 months ago
@kreepeemann at least he's giving explanations behind his beliefs if he's so wrong y don't u and the rest of those dumbasses on here give us explanations that are scientific and really answer our questions cause so far we're asking questions that no one wants to answer
racinggreg2011 7 months ago
@racinggreg2011 Listen you fucking cretin, this film does the very thing you seem so desirous for: explains, clearly and concisely the refutations of your idiotic theories. The problem is you are a hyperactive asshole, raised by stupid fucking liberals, and you can't pay attention long enough to hear it! Ha Ha! You suck cocks!
kreepeemann 7 months ago
@kreepeemann c that's exactly what i mean u guys yell out ur right and call us names but u have nothing to back up ur claims
racinggreg2011 7 months ago
lol..they cant explain.. the pentagon collapse with any sense other that.~ yeah ..that the way planes collapse.. but fact is planes have 2 wings..and none of them were found.. neither their marks on the building. neither their engines were found. Wake people.........
watch this ... copy/paste this on youtube search
Former FBI Chief says 9/11 was inside job
pjIpJRntMLQ
American Intelligence General Says 911 was a fraud
1MTDpHGkgqY
9/11 INSIDE JOB! Richard Gage
ssuAMNas1us
Vann7 8 months ago
@Vann7 Wrong again, shithead. Watch the video and don't start touching yourself during the show this time.
kreepeemann 8 months ago
Just because the History Channel makes a show about this doesn't mean it isn't worth investigating. All I have seen so far is a bunch of "Experts" vs "Conspiracy Theorist". Labeling anyone who questions something as "Conspiracy Theorist" or "truthers" allows others to easily dismiss them. Google "experts investigating 9/11" and you will find countless experts who agree something is wrong. Now here is the problem, can you call the experts conspiracy theorist? TV is not an answer ;)
anthe 9 months ago
@anthe
Streaming video and Google will not offer the answer either ;)
AlexanderTheGood89 8 months ago
@AlexanderTheGood89 Never said it would. But when I was 18 I remember watching TV when this happened. I remember years later reading building 7 fell.. What? That was the beginning. I read more than watch and take in both sides. But here we go again with trying to "label" someone lol. "You just watch online videos and google your research". But I don't, so whats next?
anthe 8 months ago
@anthe
Well, okay then. Could you name one of those "countless experts who agree something is wrong" other than the frankly frightning and bizarre not to mention grossly overstated 1,500 architect-engineer petition list floating around? That's right. Name one expert--one, any, one, person--who agrees something is wrong and has had their doubts published in a peer reviewed article.
AlexanderTheGood89 8 months ago
@AlexanderTheGood89
Steven E. Jones. Now instead of trying to call me out, go email him and hear what he has to say. I'm sure he would love to hear what you have to say on this matter.
anthe 8 months ago
@anthe
I'd love to e-mail Mr. Jones and hear what he has to say as well. I consider myself a very open-minded person. However, you never answered my question. Jones's appraisals of what happened on 9/11 are not peer reviewed as he was placed on paid leave from his University and retired in 2006. The peer review proccess is tough and precise. In fact, many people left Bentham after being associated with Jones's paper as a reviewer AFTER it was published. Now that is not a thorough peer review.
AlexanderTheGood89 8 months ago
The Department Head of BYU is one record saying, "I think without exception, the structural engineering professors in our department are NOT in agreement with the claims made by Jones in his paper, and they don't think there is accuracy and validity to these claims." The BYU Physics Dept. agrees: "Jones' department and college administrators are NOT convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."
AlexanderTheGood89 8 months ago
Steven E. Jones has a degree in physics as it relates to the book of Mormon. Prior to tackling the issue of 9.11, he wrote a paper titled "Behold My Hands," which argues that Jesus Christ visited, interacted with, and was artistically represented, by the ancient Mayans--"A crazy idea, maybe - but wait till you see the artwork of the ancient Maya! (directly quoted)." Do you believe in this idea? Probably not. But his system of analysis is exactly the same in both cases.
lol. Some scholar!
AlexanderTheGood89 8 months ago
@anthe What would you call them than? They believe that the U.S government had an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons;(dictionary) and have a theory about how they conducted said plan. Conspiracy+Theorist=Conspiracy Theorist.
Rainergunvikes 8 months ago
@Rainergunvikes No, not exactly. While I think we can both agree that some people believe they had an "evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan", others just simple believe something is wrong with the reports and twisted media. I don't believe the report 100%, I don't think they are "evil" or whatever and I'm also not a conspiracy theorist. So how would you label me? The way I do is that my name is Justin, I use my brain and search for truth instead of being spoon feed it.
anthe 8 months ago
@Rainergunvikes Also, if you did your research then you probably had at least one thought of "oh, that is questionable". Nothing is wrong with that, your just using your mind. Labeling is becoming ignorant and unstable. As soon as someone questions something people yell "conspiracy theorist!" and dismiss you. Questioning is good and should be promoted, if it gets out of control, like what your saying, then yea, not cool. But we should do it with 9/11 and among other things.
anthe 8 months ago
Comment removed
anthe 8 months ago
Comment removed
anthe 9 months ago
April 18, Monday. National Geographic Channel rebroadcast of "911: Science and Conspiracy". I highly recommend seeing it.
andyt1313 9 months ago
hahahaha 100's of people saw an americans airline jet fly into that building.. 2:31 what a fucking liar!
slcschaser 9 months ago
"a cartoon like whole in the exact shape of the wings," what a joke. look at BOTH the WTC's. they say loose chane picks a chooses information, BS.
kosnow11 10 months ago
The WTC was built in the 70's and thus full of the deadly asbestos. In some sick and twisted reasoning false flag terrorism and double insurrance policies was more profitable then conventional renovation. Red White & Blue bumper stickers helped fuel the war machine. My heart goes out to all those suffering from Ground Zero Disease.
fmcname 10 months ago
Something very confusing and disturbing is the constant ad hominem attacks by popular mechanics on the conspiracy theorists. By saying "this is how 'they' work", "they expect a cartoon cutout of the plane", "they love to pick and choose information". Im not saying which side i support but i dont hear conspiracy theorists saying "those guys at popular mechanics are bush supporters and have hidden evidence to support their point." Just speaks of uncertainty within popular mechanics' conclusion.
Disembowelment 10 months ago
@Disembowelment You don't? Shit, every single debate I've ever had with a Truther descends into them screaming "WHO DO YOU WORK FOR!? WHO PAID YOU? WAS IT THE JOOOOOOS!?"
Halo4Lyf 9 months ago
@Halo4Lyf I dont experience the same hostility myself. My statement was solely based on the information presented in this video. All I was saying was the ad hominem attacks are clear logical fallacies in their argumentation and that with the use of those fallacies it just weakens their points. I dont think that people need to become angry and hostile while arguing this stuff, while a lot of it is frustrating for both parties, nothing is achieved through aggression.
Disembowelment 9 months ago
Governments history=so many crimes & lies;CIA's Op:MK-ULTRA, Operation Ajax (1953 overthrow of Iran),Op Northwoods,JFK & Warren Commission Rport,Gulf of Tonkin lie, Watergate, Iran-Contra Scandal, Iraq-Gate,lies of Iraqi soldiers throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators to die(Gulf war),Oklahoma City Bombing cover-up,then after 9/11 comes the PATRIOT Act,domestic spying,extraordinary renditioning,torture,fraudulent elections,lies leadin us into Iraq,yet we're expected to believe this shit
fessica90 1 year ago
@fessica90
Why is it that all experts confirm the reality and it's only paranoid individuals who claim this was faked. Government has lied in the past and will lie again in the future it doesn't mean that what we all saw didn't happen. So all government officials and experts hired to investigate 911 are all lying? All experts at popular mechanics are lying too? What about all other experts around the Country, are they just not speaking out or are they in on it too?
notcrazyshwayze 1 year ago
What about the people who lost their lives on that plane that hit the Pentagon? The confirmed accounts by family members? A 757 hit the Pentagon, not a missile. People saw a plane hit the Pentagon. My God, people these days question every thing they don't like! We were attacked! There are some in this world that don't like you just for living in America. Sad, but true. You accept the Holocaust, but deny terrorism. Some logic.
Kiriakos1991 1 year ago 26
@Kiriakos1991 They're like creationists. They only need the slightest bit of evidence to believe it, but they won't accept evolution until they get 200% proof.
svendiamond 9 months ago
@svendiamond - I agree but I never use this example as most Americans do believe creationism. It is better to use the example of a "cargo cult" or those that think aliens create crop circles. No matter what evidence is presented they refuse to accept it.
What they do not realize is these theories are used to recruit in the middles east. So these Americans are actually support a theory that help to recruit terrorists to come and kill westerners. They are aiding the enemy.
WillShakespeare2007 8 months ago
@Kiriakos1991 what about that small hole that was seen in the pentagon a 757 would have destroyed most of the wall and how come there's no evidence of the plane when it's proven that the metal they use to make turbines by plane couldn't possibly be burned by jet fuel alone all facts
racinggreg2011 7 months ago
@racinggreg2011 That still does not answer the question: then where is 757? Where are the passengers? The loved ones who were never heard from again? You're saying that the grieving families are mourning for nothing. So basically the U.S. government would attack its own central defense building, possibly killing high-ranking officials, to start a war. It's too far-fetched and there is no proof whatsoever. This whole 9/11 conspiracy came out of liberal hatred for Bush.
Kiriakos1991 7 months ago
@Kiriakos1991 what about that small hole that was seen in the pentagon a 757 would have destroyed most of the wall and how come there's no evidence of the plane when it's proven that the metal they use to make turbines by plane couldn't possibly be burned by jet fuel alone all facts
racinggreg2011 7 months ago
@racinggreg2011 I mean, how can you discredit the eyewitness accounts and testimonies of so many people who saw, heard, or took part in the events of that day? People in New York City who saw planes hit the two towers of the World Trade Center. The passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 who fought with the four hijackers for control of the plane and brought it down(that plane was rumored to hit the White House). The first responders at Ground Zero.
Kiriakos1991 7 months ago
@Kiriakos1991 Terrorists that couldnt fly let alone navigate a Boeing 757, and manage to find thier way at 30,000 feet back to the pentagon and complete a turn that only a experienced fighter pilot could perform on a good day. Face it, they blew on 9/11 and the American public is waking up to that fact. Theres no proof that anything other than a missle hit the pentagon. Build. #7 was pulled in demolition, and the WTC was hit with very sohisticated weaponry, with faked video/media tech.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle actually the pilots that flew the pentagon plane were educated in flight in the U.S. sorry to burst ur bubble
MagnumPI4 7 months ago
@MagnumPI4 Sorry pal, they were learning the basics in a Cessna single prop engine 4 seater aircraft. So your saying they hopped up into the cockpit of a 757 Boeing passenger airliner, with controls display that the boxcutter terrorists couldnt even comprehend let alone ever scene before in thier lives. Then somehow managed to turn these aircraft around and fly them at 500 mph back to thier targets, and somehow they knew how to turn off the transponder. Now thats a conspiracy theory.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle well im doubly sorry because they did a pretty good job of low altitude flying to hit the world trade centers. and there is definite proof of that. Im sure u have some crack pot theory though, right hero?
MagnumPI4 7 months ago 2
@MagnumPI4 Yes sir, could you please show me the video tape of these box cutter terrorist in the cockpit, or perhaps the blackbox recordings maybe?
I'll never buy that so called terrorists flew 757's into anything, not even a large empty field. these guys couldnt even handle Cessna's in sunny florida. It boggles the mind to imagine how.
I would settle for a photoshop xerox copy with cartoon figures if you need to. I am prepared to wait till Hell freezes over if necessary sir.
paskettle 7 months ago
@Kiriakos1991 Well thousands of expert structural engineers,architects,demolition experts,scientists ect.... use science and have evidence of a demolition of some sort, the 911 report IS a theory !! That is a FACT !! They use no science and guess/assume, in a court of law they would lose and AE911TRUTH Experts would win cause they have the forensics and science. Yes jets hit but buildings could NOT fall like they did without every beam going simultaneously, IMPOSSABLE without demo
Headshothorror4488 6 months ago
@Headshothorror4488 damn...you're making a mockery to their deaths.
rahkshi0k 6 months ago 2
@Headshothorror4488 did you even watch this video? or are you just spamming conspiracy theories?
this vid just contradicts everything you say dude, get a life
rahkshi0k 6 months ago
@Kiriakos1991 It is wrong to assume that a plane hit the Pentagon just cuz numerous people claim they saw it hit the Pentagon. The truthers' claim that the plane flew over the Pentagon while a missile simultaneously hit it is actually very plausible. Nobody saw the plane fly over the Pentagon b/c their brains made them think that the plane hit it. Human eyes don't see things that their minds aren't focused on. Any magician or optical illusion expert could tell u this. Same principle here.
fanof2012 4 months ago
How did they not check the molten steel theory? What about the red/grey chips of thermite in the dust?
TahunaTheButcher1975 1 year ago
This video proves that there's a cover up. Thank you History [sic] Channel. The stupidest "expert" debunking explanations I've heard so far. What a sick joke to suggest that everything happened as the "official story" says.
roberlucas 1 year ago
@roberlucas well, can you prove it happened otherwise? Every little detail the conspiracy theorists point out are debunked. If you're so smart, why dont you try refuting them.
gameragodzilla 1 year ago
I just love how every 'conspiracy theory' raised is followed by an 'expert response' - a magazine editor. How about the multiple conflicting timelines presented to the commission by *both* FAA and NORAD? Langley scrambled in response to a 'phantom' AA11 flight - not 77 (that hit the pentagon) - and the fact that no one is held accountable for lying either in Sept '01, days after, or May/July of '04? (when questioned by the commission) or both, is worthy of a lifted eyebrow...just sayin.
LovinLivinIdaho 1 year ago
"only a missile of US armed forces could enter pentagon's airspace without getting shot down."
That's the dumbest shit i've ever heard. If you go on google map and find the pentagon. You can see that there is an airport just a little bit to the south-east. If the airspace of the pentagon is restricted, why the hell would they build an airport there?
Rayden440 1 year ago 21
oh great! now planes can turn in to liquids at a fast enought speed
dongerado 1 year ago
this video is fucking bullshit!!!!
dongerado 1 year ago
I think that the pentagon is a major distraction to the wtc.
GuidofromOtsego 1 year ago
Why is it that when they show the footage of the stuff they are trying to debunk it gets all pixelated?
GuidofromOtsego 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What happened to the engines from the Jet ?
ZEITGEIST MOVIE CHECK IT OUT
EAD4LIFE 1 year ago
Did they ever explain how Bldg # 7 fell?
EAD4LIFE 1 year ago
After finding out the truth, or the truth Big Brother told, Wilson found out his desire to seek out the truth cost him everything. So after severe torture for who know how long, the only thing he desired was to not know the truth, and accept the reality of the present situation. People state evidence, but if there was a massive plot, and it was meticulously planned out, then phat chance in finding a smoking bullet. I’ve seen enough to know that I have seen enough. Gulf of Tonkin, read about it..
mutchanogos 1 year ago
because bombs with wireless detonators require wiring.
Cacmypants 1 year ago
yeah like the pilot of the US air force is going to say, I bombed the Pentagon it was me, of course not what are they thinking.
ddddenysss333 1 year ago
Yet no wings were found. LOL
ChristianHolloway7 1 year ago
somebody sure has gone through alot of time on this ONLY to draw more attention to the real facts.
TheDuaneBrewer 1 year ago
The claimed fact; Fire wekaned the steel and the buildings collapsed.
Question; Why and how the buildings fell on their own footprint?
Fact does not seem to explain what happened, unless you assume a fact that those buildings are not demolished.
Question? Why and how are those buildings collapse, due to a natural cause, in the same manner of a controlled demolition?
No satisfactory answer for this question yet.
Fussinated 1 year ago
@Fussinated WTC left acres of deris . . . that's not falling on it's own footprint. Here's my big question, "how did they prepare three buildings for demolition in a matter of days, when it takes weeks (if not months) to rig a building 1/4 the size of one tower?"
camster910 1 year ago
oh man this video is really pissin me off. i don't know if I've got the energy, they have tried to make this look like its a fair back and forth when its not you know what experts explain in an expert manner why was there molten steel [like lava] melted metal pouring out the broken walls of the north and south tower. huh history channel. popular mechanics please will you explain to me how a fortified building like building 7 could collapse symmetrically when it by report had asymmetrical damage.
Fantacyshroom 1 year ago
@Fantacyshroom Fortified? Building 7 was the complete opposite of fortified. It's bottom was completely hollow. If you bothered to watch all the parts you would know that since they explain it later on.
strongman325 1 year ago
@strongman325 why in the hell was it hollow what are you saying that there was a chance of that building, falling at any moment.are you serious. people are rotten, money corrupts examples rage and scream through out history. blunt protruding truth how in the hell is it so unbelievable that people are capable of terrible things which incorporate lies. i have nothing to gain from what i say i lose everyday sleep, time,and tons of energy doing this back and forth. they gain from what they say.
Fantacyshroom 1 year ago
@Fantacyshroom You're stupid, hollow as in it was supported by steel beams, like a regular skyscraper, rather it had a few trusses which held it up just fine, but when the debris from the towers hit the building it took out a large part of Building 7's bottom. I don't gain from what I say either, just because you don't gain anything doesn't make you right lol.
strongman325 1 year ago
@strongman325 find me one, one......just one picture or video just one where there is a large piece of the building missing. and i will shut up and bow out.
Fantacyshroom 1 year ago
you Guys are so Dumb
this is the History channel, it's own by the mainstream media of course they are defending the Government
fact: they found Mohamed Atta's passport in 2 feet of debris less than 24 hours later
ok what was the paper made out of that pass through the fire ball without bursting into flames?? what ? the passport made out of composite material?( carbon fibers & tungsten threat?) i don't thing so
kimura2Loc 1 year ago
If u believe in the Illuminati....u can best believe 9/11 is a complete inside job
RowlexEnterprise 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why have hundreds of people reported seeing an American Airlines plane crash into the Pentagon, but no one has ever reported seeing a missile?
theoneandonlygrod 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why has hundreds of people reported seeing an American Airlines plane crash into the Pentagon, but no one has ever reported seeing a missile?
theoneandonlygrod 1 year ago
Comment removed
theoneandonlygrod 1 year ago
Only in your paranoia. The media is not controllef because they make more money by not being controlled. Aint you worked that out? If any newspaper found real evidence of a 9/11 conspiracy, they would publish and make a fortune.
Something you should realise. You are stupid. For you, normal life is way out of your depth. You seriously believe that somebody could organise a conspiracy of this magnitude, involving thousands of people, and not get cought? You fool.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
lol, what they fail to mention is that a c130 is incapable of carrying missiles, like literally impossible. It doesn't have any firing systems because its a damn cargo plane
Aelov 1 year ago
@Aelov Don't get cought by that one! AC130, look it up! You gotta watch these traps with truthers, they jump on anything.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
@Filthdrive Let me help you out since you're in dire need of it. When you make a wild assertion, back it up with FACTS! You still have nothing. "Everybody's a liar" is the essence of what you are saying. You have no hard facts - Just broad theories, distractions and look-over-here's. Stay in school.
SupportAZ 1 year ago
@SupportAZ go find the facts that i found, dont ask me to prove it, i went through so much to find out and to think for myself.... just because you dont have the capability to think for yourself and find facts that lead to a BIGGER COMPLEX PICTURE because thats what its all about A BIGGER AND COMPLEX PICTURE it's not about black n white anymore, the black n white was made to fool sheep like you, DIVIDE AND CONQUER like a game of chess. STAY OUT OF SCHOOL. because you are being BRAINWASHED.
Filthdrive 1 year ago
these conspiracy theorist are either looking to profit or just plain retarded ignoring the facts!!!.
texasdurp 1 year ago
@texasdurp dont trust the History channel, especially when theyre fuckin manistream, wtf do u expect, wheres your brains dude? dont u have the capability to think?
Filthdrive 1 year ago
@Filthdrive If the media is controlled as you believe, how did they uncover the Watergate conspiracy, Oliver North and arming the Contra and of course Clinton getting sucked off by Monica Lewinski? Oh yeah, you forgot about all that. Doh!
SvenTviking 1 year ago
@SvenTviking wtf are u talking about? if the media is owned and controlled and everything established is owned and controlled??...... try and work out how things all come together fall apart and how things work in the world and have worked since the beginning of civilization.....
Filthdrive 1 year ago
@texasdurp So retarded that you didn't refute anything in that sentence. How ironic.
camreeno360 1 year ago
Everybody slandered and libaled by the conspiracy theorists should sue. Take em to court and destroy them. Bankrupt them for life.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
@SvenTviking your mom's a conspiracy theorist
Filthdrive 1 year ago
@Filthdrive Your mum wears combat boots and smokes a pipe.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
if it was a missile and not flight 77......... then what happened to the airplane?
MrCaptainknight 1 year ago
@MrCaptainknight Watch the FULL history channel show for your answer. You haven't watched it.
SupportAZ 1 year ago
yeah maybe david copperfield made the towers dissapear and they are actually still there
hempartist420 1 year ago
When you have facts, all the conspirators can do is just yell...."you must be lying". Try to refute what they are saying with actual evidence, not a bunch of made of crap like 9/11 coincidences, September clues and Loose Change which are nothing more than a bunch of doctored video (proven), video cut short just before the proof (proven) or just a bunch of made up shit.
vaughnjb 1 year ago
@vaughnjb, Yeah. Try watching ZERO: An Investigation of 9/11
It was made by a novel prize winner! It does a much better job than previous 9/11 conspiracy documentaries. You can also watch the videos on my channel. They are some of the best, most hard-hitting films I could find on the subject. I also source all of the facts in the description so people can go do their own research.
NanoThermite911 1 year ago
LIES. LIES. LIES. I love how they say "Conspiracy Theory" and "Experts Response" Though there are "Experts" who say the complete opposite of what the History Channel "Experts" claim. (Who were all hired directly by the government to investigate)
sfjb88 1 year ago
Popular Mechanics never gonna said it was an inside job, and the "experts" are no different from those of the government. remember that sounding like you're saying the truth, doesn't mean you're really saying it. i have many reason to believe that it was an inside job, and now that th U.S government have found out that Afghanistan has a gold mine of minerals, including gold, i started to doubt that they just made this discovery. i think they knew all thins minerals were there all along..
marslnderunic 1 year ago
webster tarply is an idoit. He has never done any scholarlly work at all he is a misinformation rtard making money off the parinoid. Celente is telling people to prepare and to take care of themselves nothing wrong with that.Now alex you have done good things like helping joe capanna, exposing the credit dertives and obama's love affair with wall st and goldman. But, this is a bridge too far.
MrSocrates513 1 year ago
they didnt talk about the 3rdtower that fell by itself
forderer020 1 year ago
can I just ask who is paying for this? Do you really think this it very objective?
FormulaKarin 1 year ago
There are too CGI animations of the plane hitting pentagon. But one is very different from the other. While the first shows the plane with wing in diagonal, and in a high angle descennding, the other show the plane in a more even flying, going in a very low altitude.
Strange.
jerryaltman 1 year ago
im the 25911th viewer, scary
1994anmol 1 year ago
has anyone else ever seen this c130 pilots account before this?i dont recall ever hearing his story,i mean that is a major part of the story if he were there & to me that seems to have been left out
churchofruss 1 year ago
If you really pay attention to this video, it looks like the guys from loose change ares seriously asking questions, and the "experts" aren't actually answering those questions. Instead we see them answering around the question, like many politicians.
I'm not saying that 911 is an inside job, but because of the these "experts" are answering i'm no suspicious.
KonradxHylton 1 year ago
@KonradxHylton
I Agree, watch this video
SEPTEMBER CLUES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
all this is is the history channels so called "experts" denying all conspiracy theories, without any evidence
UNITEDWERISE 1 year ago
@UNITEDWERISE
well said, watch this video next
911 CONTINUOUS PIECES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Gary, you sure are contributing a whole lot to this discussion still, I see? Get a life, Looser.
pattoncarter 1 year ago
stunning shitty attitude
glad i never met one single person who commented on here
garycalgary 1 year ago
absolutely stunning.
People try to explain what happened
BUT IT'S ALL A BUNCH OF COCK SUCKING FUCKIN BULLSHIT
ISN'T IT
Why even be alive? Why bother to exist if the world is so horrible?
garycalgary 1 year ago
HAHAHA COUNTER MISSILE BARRAGE YEAH!
dumb frenchy fuck
poopmypants4 1 year ago
fuckin asshole or BITCH
garycalgary 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
History channels give very very vague explanations. And gives 0 scientific explanations. Please pay close attention. It's obvious propaganda.
MrCone223 1 year ago
like your moronic truthers do anything better, grow a brain
SUNSNARE06 1 year ago
there were alot of videos taken by the government that show what hit the pentagon. there is no way the few frames they released is acceptable where security is tightest in the world. i'm not saying a plane didn't hit, i'm saying they have a better video (probably several) so why would that not be released. videos of the wtc were not supressed like this. if the government is lying about this then what else? who is the video really evidence against? a muslim or someone else?
skyartstuff 1 year ago
Comment removed
skyartstuff 1 year ago
Filthdrive's "smoking gun" is still just a broad theory. LOL. No facts. Reminds me of Johnny Cochran saying "Well Nicole did drugs therefore she must have been killed by drug dealers". When you have nothing, just start swinging for the fences and hopefully something will stick. "The History Channel is a bunch of liars". LOL. Why don't you address the facts like the fact that steel loses HALF it's strength at 1,000 degrees -- or maybe you can challenge the laws of the universe. LOL.
BladeJones 2 years ago 12
ohhh nice label dude well done! you said "smoking gun" how cool and informed are YOUUU!!!!
Filthdrive 2 years ago
@BladeJones
1st Watch
JOHN LEAR 911
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@BladeJones,
So on one hand you are saying that the building could have collapsed naturally from fire weakening the steel, and not made any "VERY LOUD SOUND"(s)
Yet, on the other hand, you make every excuse in the universe for why Nanothermite could not have been used to achieve the same (or similar) effect at a controlled and accelerated rate???
Just to be clear, could you confirm that this is YOUR LOGIC? Debunkers are idiots who contradict themselves.
NanoThermite911 1 year ago
@NanoThermite911 and conspiracy theorists have the comparable tendencies of smoking crack
hempartist420 1 year ago
the HISTORY channel is a corporations like all other large corporations which are "OWNED" by these elites... who runt eh fucking world you stupid ignorant clones stop suck each others cocks and wake the fuck up and learn and observe information FOR YOURSELF!! think for yourself!!!
Filthdrive 2 years ago
Um OK have any evidence?
DrunkenAsparagus 2 years ago