@loonmaniac If Jews killed Kennedy then how do you explain WHY J Edgar Hoover and VP turned President Lyndon Johnson cooked the evidence to show one shooter, three shots when the video above shows the way to PROVE the government's scenario is wrong. When you look at other information it's easy to show that the US Government LIED to hide the truth. WHY would LBJ and Hoover do all this for Jewish conspirators? The simple obvious answer is LBJ and Hoover killed JFK & why they lie even today.
ps tippit was the spitting image of kennedy and could have used his body for autopsy photographs,the lack of ordinary joes in deally plasa stands out to if the dallas police had it covered they efectivly could have staged most of it,i dont think he was killed the way it has been portrayed,like the 911 footage i think is total fake i am no buff on most of this stuff i am doing a degree in photography as a mature student,and an outside observer i may be wrong on few things but the footage is bogus
hole in the front windshield sugests to me that the throat shot came from the front i no this my sound like a wild theory[it is ha ha]but ive been doing a bit of detective work if we say that what we see is not what we get,the smokeing gun for me is governor conerly,when you look at it he had the best oppertunity,even jackie could have been in on it unfaithfull husband and so,she was with onassis pre asassination the plot thickens,....
the thing that really stands out was the speed in which oswolds was named and how it spred through the media ,if you look at americas history of asassinated leaders i feel one has to conclude that other organisations above the goverment pull the strings,its easy to find a scapegoat ,whilst the real guilty walk free,have a look at rothchild family as for the z film after 3 years in unni i wouldnt give it the time of day as a true glimce of the moment of asassination,to meny red herrings i feel
@aifammafiaaifam Oswald was set up to die that day for killing a policeman but when it looked like he'd get a trial, he had to die. This whole scam was planned but many things went wrong, including that the sounds of the shots were recorded. History will look back on us as absolute fools to have ever believed the JFK head shot came from behind him, it was fired from the right front. NEVER TRUST ANYTHING the US Government says about JFK assassination, they are lying to hide identify of killers.
@aifammafiaaifam ,its all interesting stuff brother,why was the autopsy drawrings not photographs,the autopsy photographs of kennedy look very unrealistic to me,jackies blood stained suit ive found only one photograph showing that,in the plasa that day were cuban mafia x2french millitary lbjs henchman ,dallas police gunmen ,in the english evening standerd news paper on the 15th nov 63 the report said conerlly was also hit in the head,,, peace up mate hey i am on your side you no lol
@aifammafiaaifam check out my vid on frames 313 and 314 zapruder film. then look at the trajectory. then look at jackies jacket she wore that day and the one she wore to lbj's swearing in. the american people got took all the way around that day.
respects bro,ive been studying photography for the last few years and was allways interested in the asassination of jfk must be my age lol...in the british evening post 5 days after the shooting the paper said connely was also shot in the head,more media lies so i stripped back the story as i saw most of it as a web of lies or false acusations1/after a small amount of reserch the thing that suprised me the most was the amount of known asassins in dealy plaza at that time,and very ...
How do you know that the shirt is real in theory one? Also, I was looking at the acoustical evidence, How can the 2nd bullet be proven? It is just a random spike that looks the same as the one next to it, going of what this is saying there would have been around 12 bullets, since there are other spikes that have the same frequency. Third, is the YOUR video bias? Did you watch the thing on the history channel first or after? If you saw it first then the timing you made is a bias chart.
@bluedrago505 The shirt is held by the Fed Gov't, if it's faked they altered it. The audio analysis uses ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS, they don't use just the muzzle blast sound they use the ECHOES THAT CAN BE DETECTED! Think about it, fire a shot later from WHERE you think shooters may have been located AND if the echoes match the actual recording, you know WHERE the shooter was located. They matched THREE shots from TSBD, one from grassy knoll. 5th shot, only I know where it was fired from.
@bluedrago505 THIRD: When I realized the last two shots were BANG-BANG on the audio evidence I already knew that numerous witnesses said the last two shots were BANG-BANG and I had already shown that Connally could NOT have been pulled over by Nellie starting 0.7 seconds after JFK was shot in the head, she was NOT strong enough to do that. The Bullet to JGC back knocked him forward and then she pulled him over. Some "experts" are lying, some are fools who believe impossible things.
@bluedrago505 Second: Random spike?There were 26 identified reflections in both the test shot and actual recording to show the grassy knoll shot was real. Not my calculation but it has been said that the odds of random noise matching a real test shot is over 100,000 to one against it, put in FOUR shots matching test shots AND the shots matching the Z film in timing (4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds) and you have ASTRONOMICAL odds there was a conspiracy. The Gov't isn't just wrong, they're lying.
As the queen pointed out: "If I had balls I'd be king!" The sexual couplings between Oprah & Gayle are non-lesbian in nature. When it comes to pass that the meek inherit the Earth there'll be no need for the brave & rugged men of actor Bruce Willis' caliber.
How do you know the federal government is withholding "a massive amount of evidence"? Have you seen it or is this a supposition based on your opinion? This is typical CTer logic (or lack of it) Whenever there are a set of known facts the CT'es, when faced with this evidence, will dismiss any conclusion that points to LHO as the sole gunman and make an accusation that the government is "withholding evidence". This is more silly buffoonery from the CT'er crowd.
@autoad Read what I said AGAIN, I said the US Gov't holds a massive amount of info that shows ONE MAN fired THREE SHOTS to kill JFK.
Then I show one documentary CLEARLY showed that a bullet hitting JFK several inches below his collar could NOT have exited his throat. WHAT DID HAPPEN?
The last two shots were fired a split second apart, BANG-BANG. One hit JFK in head followed a split second later by the last shot.
Understand 4.8 and 0.7 seconds & you can finally PROVE lies were told.
Upon further examination, it's now believed the recording of the shots being fired at the president were made about a minute after the shooting. Recordings that sound like "pops" and bangs" could easily be "impulse sounds" from motorcycle engine misfires scratches on the Dictabelt, just to name a few. The audio recording are at best marginally credible. The conclusions made by the HSCA regarding conspiracy were made, under committee member protest, on these misinterpreted recordings.
@autoad Recordings that sound like "pops" and bangs" could easily be "impulse sounds" from motorcycle engine misfires scratches on the Dictabelt, just to name a few.
Whoever said that and whoever believes that doesn't even have a remote clue concerning ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS.
A joke may be applicable here: IF you put an idiot through college you get out an educated idiot.
What baloney. You conspiracy people will believe and peddle anything that hints of conspiracy. No have no evidence (only the fabricated kind) no proof, no physical evidence, nothing of any substance. It's all based on supposition, rumor, assumptions, guessing, and a blind belief we live in a world where events are all a conspiracy controlled by an unspecified "them". Plus, you don't have any legitimate scientific credentials in forensics, acoustics, ballistics, physics and you lack common sense.
The audio recording is forensic proof. The people who said it did not record the sounds of the shots did not attack the analysis from an acoustics standpoint, they attacked it from "timing."
The acoustic evidence COULD NOT be faked. When it was presented to the HSCA on the LAST DAY OF THE HEARINGS, it caused shock waves. The rest of the HSCA report looking at autopsy etc. said one shooter, three shots BUT the audio said multilple shooters.
@SCGATOR2001 The forensic evidence was debunked by two independent labs. The "scientists" who testified before the HSCA said the recording came from the open microphone on Officer H.B McClain's motorcycle. They said McClain was just about to turn onto Elm St. when the first shot was fired and recorded. McClain said he was just on Houston St. Photos and film taken in Dealey show that McClain was correct. The acoustic "evidence" was wrong.
@SCGATOR2001 The recording made by the microphone stuck on "open" were allegedly made by H.B.McLane. The conclusion made that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll was based on the assumption that McLain was turning from Houston St. onto Elm. Movies and photos taken that day in Dealey show that McLain was not there(he was half a block behind turning onto Houston) in fact, nobody was where they "assumed" he was. The interpretation of the recordings are faulty and therefore, no second gun.
@autoad You seem to believe what Dale Myers writes, dreams up and screws up. Myers as I recall used FIVE different films to come up with his conclusion that H. B. McLane was turning onto Houston Street from Main Street when the shots were fired.
@SCGATOR2001 It's interesting you bring up Dale Meyers. He was once a conspiracy theorist but changed his mind after doing his own research. I'm not surprised you'll dismiss his work because it doesn't correlate with your immovable notions of conspiracy. Of course he's going to use multiple films in order to establish the whereabouts of McLain. If he didn't you'd be hollering "conspiracy".
@rommelgi Well, you're wrong about me being a federal agent. You're wrong about me having no life and you're wrong about me making a comment on every remark.
@NeilCrouse Typical CT'er. Insults. That's all you can do when you encounter someone who doesn't go goose stepping their way down Conspiracy Avenue with you. You can believe whatever you want about the assassination because it's a free country. Beside, there are about two dozen other conspiracy videos on YouTube that put the means, motive and opportunity into the hands of people not mentioned in this one. Are you telling them they're wrong, or stupid or they "lack common sense"?
@autoad Bro, I couldn't care less who you do your goose stepping with goof, and I was going to put some energy into arguing with you, but anyone desperate or sad enough to have saved an invite from a "Girls Gone Wild"-ish type of site in your Comments" for two motherfucking years deserves my pity, not my scorn. Have a nice day :) and I'll see you in that space I just rented in your head.
@NeilCrouse Typical CT'er. Name calling, insults and a hint of a childish tantrum. You go ahead and believe whatever you want. It's a free county and there's no law against immaturity.
I still don't understand how any person who has thoroughly researched 22Nov63 can buy the lone nut, 3 shots, no cover-up, no CIA or Mafia involvement, Ruby was a Patriot concerned for Mrs.Kennedy, .... I'd say the "conspriracy nuts" are the ones that still believe the Warren Report.
Like you say, no intelligent person can conclude the US Government did not tell lies. What they can't understand is that governments have been lying throughout history, the US Government is no different.
The nuts are the ones who believe the Warren Commission and the majority of Americans have always believed that.
One of the things I can tell you is you can't say Kennedy was hit from the side or the front because of his reaction . A bullet is not a cannon. It's not bouncing off a body . It's going through a body . Big difference. The reason he's reacting that way is because of the part of the brain that was hit from the back.
I don't use the momentum argument I use the proof provided by ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS. You probably don't have any idea how that works and the people who say it is not valid also have no idea how it works either, they never discredited the studies done by two independent experts.
What you are experiencing is denial, denial that fools like Vince Bugliosi are wrong, the US Gov't can pull off a BIG LIE, they do it all the time.
I love complete full proof arguments like you just made, YOU'RE WRONG!
Please explain to me how TWO TOTALLY INDEPENDENT ways of measuring the time between shots in the JFK assassination show 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds? You can't explain it away just like the two major papers that attempted to explain away the acoustical studies done.
You're left with a problem as you cling to the liar's explanations: Either the US Government told huge lies, altered evidence etc.
I know people have lied. Oliver Stone had plenty of lies in JFK. Jean Hill also lied. And if you've ever been to that area you would see that echos would explain the sound. Again, Lee Harvey Oswald was the only shooter. Conspiracy People have yet to bring one person to trail for the shooting, because they don't exist.
I don't care who pulled the trigger, I care about the top of the pyramid that ordered the murder then had the power to cover it up with lies so big that no reasonable person could believe the US Government has scum in it that would do this.
The acoustic evidence could NOT be changed, it snuck into the HSCA and then the US Government had no choice but to lie about it too, either it is WRONG OR many of the things the US Gov't has always held is FORGED.
Good luck with that. I would bet any conspiracy person $500,000 that I could prove he did it to a jury. They did this already of course and he was found guilty. My offer stands.
We simply need to figure out how to configure a jury then we can each make many times that amount with a documentary that shows you were fooled into believing the biggest lie in history.
You'll notice my picture with Dr Cyril Wecht, that was the FIRST guy I had the pleasure of showing last two shots BANG-BANG scenario to.
His counter arguements weren't any better than yours. Write to David Lifton if you want to know how Dr Wecht handles information that doesn't fit
When I showed Dr Wecht that the last two shots were fired a split second apart he said he had NEVER heard that before.
NEVER?
He was a member of the HSCA and he was the LONE DISSENTING member. I explained to him the reason he dissented and WHY his reasons were consistent with the last two shots being fired 0.7 seconds apart.
HOW Could Dr Wecht have had a convincing argument if he did NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED?
Simple answer, he could not have convinced, he just confused.
You and Vince Bugliosi get HBO (for Example) to have another trial. The bet is $100,000.
All I have to prove is the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG which proves conspiracy. I get to use a few witnesses, I don't need many. When key witnesses are dead or won't appear, video of what they said can be used.
HBO will make $millions and you won't miss the $100,000 you loose at all as they will pay us well for finally killing this lie.
@SCGATOR2001 Are you talking about the "acoustic evidence" off the dicta belt from the motorcycle cop's open microphone? The one which was ultimately shown to be bogus. You have no proof and nothing to show it was anything but Oswald and 3 bullets other than idle fantasy and conjecture.
The reason we are talking about this "mystery" decades later is that we were lied to. Today, the truth is so ugly about the coup that killed JFK that they will tell any lie.
The audio recording was analyzed by TWO different experts and they independently confirmed that there were multiple shooters who fired shots from different directions. Even w/o the recording the evidence is overwhelming we were lied to
The recording was NOT shown to be bogus by experts who know what they're talking about.
If you take time and understand just a few details it will all make sense. If you read what fools like Vince Bugliosi write in RECLAIMING HISTORY then you will continue to buy into the BIG LIE.
There is a neat story that all fits together to show you the truth. I know I don't have a pretty published book but I have something you want to see, a consistent story that the witnesses, the films, the doctors all say happened.
The one shooter three shots scenario does not fit together. truth does.
This video is wrong . Clear video shows that as Kennedy was hit from behind the sign and Connally is hit at the same time. His( Connally ) jacket pops out and watch his hat that he's holding . He's been hit.
The video is NOT wrong. You are assuming things you have been told are correct when the information is based on LIES.
Connally's lapel moves because he raises his arms at that moment NOT because he is shot in the back. To understand what happened here you MUST understand all of your assumptions that led up to you buying Dale Meyers silly conclusions.
The odds that this video is RIGHT are well over a million to one, in fact they are astronomical.
I have an answer for this about Connally. There was blood. Did you expect it to blow out of what he was wearing? It wasn't like the Kennedy head wound. The Warren Commission was correct .
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
That audio recording was proven to be false....
Fact is Connally and Kennedy were hit at the same time nearly with the same bullet....perfectly in line with the book depository building, the conspiracy is a fact though, that the KGB killed Kennedy for their own reasons having to do with John son promising them bolder socialism and cooperation etc.
After the first review was done a second set of audio experts reviewed the tape and the analysis confirmed the shot that hit JFK in the head was fired from the right front.
The Justice Dept after the HSCA dropped that bombshell found FOOLS who were not qualified nor did they evaluate ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS, they focused on BS and said it's wrong. No one, and I mean NO ONE analyzed the data to disprove it.
yah look at the zapputer film, the driver turns and shoots Kennedy point blank, from the front/right, you even see a flash from the pistol as the driver turns back around, Even people standing nearby say the last shit came from the car, after the SS was told to stand down and leave the motercade?????????
This is a clear case of lets phyco analize facts to confuse everyone to the point of dismay
If you watch the video again you'll see that the timing between the Zapruder film and the Acoustic evidence PROVES that the audio evidence is valid. Once you know that you can use the analysis of the audio recording to PROVE where the shots were fired from.
Once you've done that, you KNOW that the 4th shot that hit JFK in the head was fired from the right front. The odds of this being true are astronomical. The driver did not fire any shots.
and your determining this from some recording that you think is legit?
You have no idea what your talking about, in fact even if the recordings were legit there is no way of telling which direction the shots were coming from, you my freind have some serious issues, you are not a bat, you dont have directional radar lol woooooooow, we got some serious characters on this site lol
It's seems impossible at first but here's how they tell where shots were fired from only having a recording: Look at all the REFLECTIONS (echoes) after the shot was fired. Each reflection is delayed depending on how far each object that reflects sound is from the microphone.
Compare the original recording to a recording made later from a shot fired from where you think a shooter was. When the HSCA did this, three shots matched the Texas School Book Dep. & ONE shot matched grassy knoll!
You're right to question something that doesn't make sense. When you compare the Film to the information from the audio recording you get things like:
Shot to JFK's head was fired from in front just like anybody who has ever looked at the film thinks
The time between three of the shots is 4.8 seconds & 0.7 seconds (the first two shots you can't see as the car is behind the sign) in both the film and the recording!
Connally is bent over by the shot to his back just like he said happened
The fact is the odds are well over a million to one that Connally was NOT shot in the back when JFK first reacted to a shot.
The reason we are talking about this decades later is that the government's LIE does not match the witnesses, does not match physics nor does it make sense.
I show the documentary BEYOND THE MAGIC BULLET and those idiots showed the SBT is WRONG yet they said they proved that it's possible just like every other idiotic "documentary" does.
Ugh there was no need for a magic bullet idiot, the bullet struck Connally and Kennedy went straight as an arrow and clearly came from Oswald's rifle...Arlen Specter is a dumbass who attempted a dumbbass solution to a dumbass hypothesis that was flawed to begin with, it did not take a bunch of turns and dives to hit kenedy than connally.
You either didn't watch the video OR you didn't understand it. The video clearly shows that the last three shots in BOTH the Z film and the audio recording BOTH show the last three shots were fired 4.8 and 0.7 seconds apart. That PROVES that the audio recording did record the sounds of the shots.
Once you know that, you know when and where 4 of the 5 shots came from. You know the single bullet "theory" is false & you know the government investigations are either flawed or they lied.
Overall I agree re: Gov't will tell any lie to hide the truth, it's been hijacked by a criminal-corporate-oligarchic cartel. Since seeing James Files' 'confession', I think he may have fired 2nd Kennedy's head-shots -- tho of course he MAY just be a fake glory-seeker. But then, your audio match does NOT fit the official story, all 3 first shots too quick for Oswald's Mannlicher. There may have been 2 rear shooters, ie. another on Daltex roof. The shot was too important to trust to Oswald.
The Driver shot JFK, CiA & FBI controlled by the Rothschild Dynasty had him shot because JFK was going to stop the Federal Reserve Bank from Ripping off the American Tax Payer.
That is a motive but I don't believe anybody had JFK shot but a small powerful group who could change evidence, control investigations and make the press look like absolute idiots.
I think you agree that the video shows there was definitely a conspiracy to kill JFK BUT to cover up the investigation requires real power. That power came from LBJ and J Edgar Hoover, two very corrupt and powerful people. Somebody else may have owned LBJ but right now I think the pointer stops at him and Hoover.
Bernanke, Geithner, Rubens, Summers, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan & the Federal Reserve Bank know exactly what they are doing by collapsing the US Dollar:
The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and, in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global Monetary Authority [GMA - run directly by international bankers freed of any government control] -a planetary financial control organization" - Bruce Wiseman
Killing JFK was an inside job, it was LBJ and J Edgar Hoover preventing both from being exposed as the criminals they were.
9/11 was NOT an inside job, it was a US Government totally incompetent that let a terrorist attack on the US happen when the clowns should have been caught before the first airliner took off.
The 9/11 Commission has one thing in common with the Warren Commission and that is both were manipulated to come up with a "preordained" solution as the truth could NOT be shown
I disagree, 911 was an inside job, Cheney owned 43% of Halliburton and Halliburton was at the Supreme court hearing and losing forcing Halliburton to declare bankruptcy, so cheney told bush to attack Iraq. Halliburton ownes all the drills to drill for oil. Our gov. kills people for green bloody money.
The way the BIG LIE is told is that people are taught to come up with any old foolish conspiracy theory and think it makes sense.
It's irrelevant what Cheney owned, what he told Bush because there is EVIDENCE that Iraq was involved. I usually don't waste my time talking about 9/11, if Americans can't understand hard proof in the JFK assassination, they sure can't understand that our government lies to protect American Presidents that are idiots,Clinton was the man who made the DUMBASS mistakes
Money owns this country not freedom thats the problem, endless wars in the name of fake money and fake religions, J
Jews run the globe, look at all the famous people who talked bad about them, Napolean, Henry Ford, ect.....look it up...
Hitler thought noone in America would fight against him cus the Jews were causing the depression and other atrosities, thats why he did it the way he did, we did;nt see it but we do now.....
Great video, SCGATOR! I'm looking forward to the next parts, when you tell us about that back wound and, most importantly, the one that went straight through the windscreen and hit Kennedy in the throat. Then it will become obvious who the only man could be that started the cover-up that has lasted nearly half a century. Well done!
Another great video, SCGATOR! Great job! If only the people in Washington did half as well as you on this subject, this crime would have been solved a long time ago..
Thanks but think about what you said, you're assuming the crime has not already been solved.
In the video, the shooting mockup shows the bullet that hit JFK in the back would not have exited his throat.
The last three shots fired match perfectly in both the Z film and the audio recording which proves the audio recording did record the sounds of the shots.
The audio analysis shows us WHERE 4 of the 5 shots were fired from.
WHY THE MISTAKES? The Gov't will tell ANY LIE to hide the truth!
good stuff :D
Donnie2020 1 year ago
The Jews killed Kennedy.
loonmaniac 1 year ago
@loonmaniac If Jews killed Kennedy then how do you explain WHY J Edgar Hoover and VP turned President Lyndon Johnson cooked the evidence to show one shooter, three shots when the video above shows the way to PROVE the government's scenario is wrong. When you look at other information it's easy to show that the US Government LIED to hide the truth. WHY would LBJ and Hoover do all this for Jewish conspirators? The simple obvious answer is LBJ and Hoover killed JFK & why they lie even today.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
ps tippit was the spitting image of kennedy and could have used his body for autopsy photographs,the lack of ordinary joes in deally plasa stands out to if the dallas police had it covered they efectivly could have staged most of it,i dont think he was killed the way it has been portrayed,like the 911 footage i think is total fake i am no buff on most of this stuff i am doing a degree in photography as a mature student,and an outside observer i may be wrong on few things but the footage is bogus
aifammafiaaifam 1 year ago
hole in the front windshield sugests to me that the throat shot came from the front i no this my sound like a wild theory[it is ha ha]but ive been doing a bit of detective work if we say that what we see is not what we get,the smokeing gun for me is governor conerly,when you look at it he had the best oppertunity,even jackie could have been in on it unfaithfull husband and so,she was with onassis pre asassination the plot thickens,....
aifammafiaaifam 1 year ago
the thing that really stands out was the speed in which oswolds was named and how it spred through the media ,if you look at americas history of asassinated leaders i feel one has to conclude that other organisations above the goverment pull the strings,its easy to find a scapegoat ,whilst the real guilty walk free,have a look at rothchild family as for the z film after 3 years in unni i wouldnt give it the time of day as a true glimce of the moment of asassination,to meny red herrings i feel
aifammafiaaifam 1 year ago
@aifammafiaaifam Oswald was set up to die that day for killing a policeman but when it looked like he'd get a trial, he had to die. This whole scam was planned but many things went wrong, including that the sounds of the shots were recorded. History will look back on us as absolute fools to have ever believed the JFK head shot came from behind him, it was fired from the right front. NEVER TRUST ANYTHING the US Government says about JFK assassination, they are lying to hide identify of killers.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
@aifammafiaaifam ,its all interesting stuff brother,why was the autopsy drawrings not photographs,the autopsy photographs of kennedy look very unrealistic to me,jackies blood stained suit ive found only one photograph showing that,in the plasa that day were cuban mafia x2french millitary lbjs henchman ,dallas police gunmen ,in the english evening standerd news paper on the 15th nov 63 the report said conerlly was also hit in the head,,, peace up mate hey i am on your side you no lol
SuperBandstand 1 year ago
@aifammafiaaifam check out my vid on frames 313 and 314 zapruder film. then look at the trajectory. then look at jackies jacket she wore that day and the one she wore to lbj's swearing in. the american people got took all the way around that day.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
respects bro,ive been studying photography for the last few years and was allways interested in the asassination of jfk must be my age lol...in the british evening post 5 days after the shooting the paper said connely was also shot in the head,more media lies so i stripped back the story as i saw most of it as a web of lies or false acusations1/after a small amount of reserch the thing that suprised me the most was the amount of known asassins in dealy plaza at that time,and very ...
aifammafiaaifam 1 year ago
How do you know that the shirt is real in theory one? Also, I was looking at the acoustical evidence, How can the 2nd bullet be proven? It is just a random spike that looks the same as the one next to it, going of what this is saying there would have been around 12 bullets, since there are other spikes that have the same frequency. Third, is the YOUR video bias? Did you watch the thing on the history channel first or after? If you saw it first then the timing you made is a bias chart.
bluedrago505 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 The shirt is held by the Fed Gov't, if it's faked they altered it. The audio analysis uses ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS, they don't use just the muzzle blast sound they use the ECHOES THAT CAN BE DETECTED! Think about it, fire a shot later from WHERE you think shooters may have been located AND if the echoes match the actual recording, you know WHERE the shooter was located. They matched THREE shots from TSBD, one from grassy knoll. 5th shot, only I know where it was fired from.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 THIRD: When I realized the last two shots were BANG-BANG on the audio evidence I already knew that numerous witnesses said the last two shots were BANG-BANG and I had already shown that Connally could NOT have been pulled over by Nellie starting 0.7 seconds after JFK was shot in the head, she was NOT strong enough to do that. The Bullet to JGC back knocked him forward and then she pulled him over. Some "experts" are lying, some are fools who believe impossible things.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 Second: Random spike?There were 26 identified reflections in both the test shot and actual recording to show the grassy knoll shot was real. Not my calculation but it has been said that the odds of random noise matching a real test shot is over 100,000 to one against it, put in FOUR shots matching test shots AND the shots matching the Z film in timing (4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds) and you have ASTRONOMICAL odds there was a conspiracy. The Gov't isn't just wrong, they're lying.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As the queen pointed out: "If I had balls I'd be king!" The sexual couplings between Oprah & Gayle are non-lesbian in nature. When it comes to pass that the meek inherit the Earth there'll be no need for the brave & rugged men of actor Bruce Willis' caliber.
ThingsTerrestrial 1 year ago
How do you know the federal government is withholding "a massive amount of evidence"? Have you seen it or is this a supposition based on your opinion? This is typical CTer logic (or lack of it) Whenever there are a set of known facts the CT'es, when faced with this evidence, will dismiss any conclusion that points to LHO as the sole gunman and make an accusation that the government is "withholding evidence". This is more silly buffoonery from the CT'er crowd.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad Read what I said AGAIN, I said the US Gov't holds a massive amount of info that shows ONE MAN fired THREE SHOTS to kill JFK.
Then I show one documentary CLEARLY showed that a bullet hitting JFK several inches below his collar could NOT have exited his throat. WHAT DID HAPPEN?
The last two shots were fired a split second apart, BANG-BANG. One hit JFK in head followed a split second later by the last shot.
Understand 4.8 and 0.7 seconds & you can finally PROVE lies were told.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
@SCGATOR2001
Tell me; was LBJ a loyal Catholic?
What about the FBI director?
I suggest you read the well documented books on my home channel.
Furthermore, one can not trust the "Zapruder film", for I have seen at least three different ones over the years.
ziggy2sound4u 1 year ago
Upon further examination, it's now believed the recording of the shots being fired at the president were made about a minute after the shooting. Recordings that sound like "pops" and bangs" could easily be "impulse sounds" from motorcycle engine misfires scratches on the Dictabelt, just to name a few. The audio recording are at best marginally credible. The conclusions made by the HSCA regarding conspiracy were made, under committee member protest, on these misinterpreted recordings.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad Recordings that sound like "pops" and bangs" could easily be "impulse sounds" from motorcycle engine misfires scratches on the Dictabelt, just to name a few.
Whoever said that and whoever believes that doesn't even have a remote clue concerning ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS.
A joke may be applicable here: IF you put an idiot through college you get out an educated idiot.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
What baloney. You conspiracy people will believe and peddle anything that hints of conspiracy. No have no evidence (only the fabricated kind) no proof, no physical evidence, nothing of any substance. It's all based on supposition, rumor, assumptions, guessing, and a blind belief we live in a world where events are all a conspiracy controlled by an unspecified "them". Plus, you don't have any legitimate scientific credentials in forensics, acoustics, ballistics, physics and you lack common sense.
autoad 1 year ago
The audio recording is forensic proof. The people who said it did not record the sounds of the shots did not attack the analysis from an acoustics standpoint, they attacked it from "timing."
The acoustic evidence COULD NOT be faked. When it was presented to the HSCA on the LAST DAY OF THE HEARINGS, it caused shock waves. The rest of the HSCA report looking at autopsy etc. said one shooter, three shots BUT the audio said multilple shooters.
Only one can be right, audio cannot be faked.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
@SCGATOR2001 The forensic evidence was debunked by two independent labs. The "scientists" who testified before the HSCA said the recording came from the open microphone on Officer H.B McClain's motorcycle. They said McClain was just about to turn onto Elm St. when the first shot was fired and recorded. McClain said he was just on Houston St. Photos and film taken in Dealey show that McClain was correct. The acoustic "evidence" was wrong.
autoad 1 year ago
@SCGATOR2001 The recording made by the microphone stuck on "open" were allegedly made by H.B.McLane. The conclusion made that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll was based on the assumption that McLain was turning from Houston St. onto Elm. Movies and photos taken that day in Dealey show that McLain was not there(he was half a block behind turning onto Houston) in fact, nobody was where they "assumed" he was. The interpretation of the recordings are faulty and therefore, no second gun.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad You seem to believe what Dale Myers writes, dreams up and screws up. Myers as I recall used FIVE different films to come up with his conclusion that H. B. McLane was turning onto Houston Street from Main Street when the shots were fired.
That is absolutely not correct.
SCGATOR2001 1 year ago
@SCGATOR2001 It's interesting you bring up Dale Meyers. He was once a conspiracy theorist but changed his mind after doing his own research. I'm not surprised you'll dismiss his work because it doesn't correlate with your immovable notions of conspiracy. Of course he's going to use multiple films in order to establish the whereabouts of McLain. If he didn't you'd be hollering "conspiracy".
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad I bet you are a federal agent, you seriously have no life if you have to make a comment on every remark.
rommelgi 1 year ago
@rommelgi Well, you're wrong about me being a federal agent. You're wrong about me having no life and you're wrong about me making a comment on every remark.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad I hope you were looking deep into a mirror when you stated "you lack common sense"!
NeilCrouse 1 year ago
@NeilCrouse Typical CT'er. Insults. That's all you can do when you encounter someone who doesn't go goose stepping their way down Conspiracy Avenue with you. You can believe whatever you want about the assassination because it's a free country. Beside, there are about two dozen other conspiracy videos on YouTube that put the means, motive and opportunity into the hands of people not mentioned in this one. Are you telling them they're wrong, or stupid or they "lack common sense"?
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad Bro, I couldn't care less who you do your goose stepping with goof, and I was going to put some energy into arguing with you, but anyone desperate or sad enough to have saved an invite from a "Girls Gone Wild"-ish type of site in your Comments" for two motherfucking years deserves my pity, not my scorn. Have a nice day :) and I'll see you in that space I just rented in your head.
NeilCrouse 1 year ago
@NeilCrouse Typical CT'er. Name calling, insults and a hint of a childish tantrum. You go ahead and believe whatever you want. It's a free county and there's no law against immaturity.
autoad 1 year ago
I still don't understand how any person who has thoroughly researched 22Nov63 can buy the lone nut, 3 shots, no cover-up, no CIA or Mafia involvement, Ruby was a Patriot concerned for Mrs.Kennedy, .... I'd say the "conspriracy nuts" are the ones that still believe the Warren Report.
pgkeen123 2 years ago 2
Like you say, no intelligent person can conclude the US Government did not tell lies. What they can't understand is that governments have been lying throughout history, the US Government is no different.
The nuts are the ones who believe the Warren Commission and the majority of Americans have always believed that.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
excellent analysis !!
DoubleR666 2 years ago
One of the things I can tell you is you can't say Kennedy was hit from the side or the front because of his reaction . A bullet is not a cannon. It's not bouncing off a body . It's going through a body . Big difference. The reason he's reacting that way is because of the part of the brain that was hit from the back.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
I don't use the momentum argument I use the proof provided by ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS. You probably don't have any idea how that works and the people who say it is not valid also have no idea how it works either, they never discredited the studies done by two independent experts.
What you are experiencing is denial, denial that fools like Vince Bugliosi are wrong, the US Gov't can pull off a BIG LIE, they do it all the time.
It's simply a case of fools believing liars.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
If you're talking about the audio picked up by the open microphone of the police officer you're wrong.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
I love complete full proof arguments like you just made, YOU'RE WRONG!
Please explain to me how TWO TOTALLY INDEPENDENT ways of measuring the time between shots in the JFK assassination show 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds? You can't explain it away just like the two major papers that attempted to explain away the acoustical studies done.
You're left with a problem as you cling to the liar's explanations: Either the US Government told huge lies, altered evidence etc.
OR
...?
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
I know people have lied. Oliver Stone had plenty of lies in JFK. Jean Hill also lied. And if you've ever been to that area you would see that echos would explain the sound. Again, Lee Harvey Oswald was the only shooter. Conspiracy People have yet to bring one person to trail for the shooting, because they don't exist.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
I don't care who pulled the trigger, I care about the top of the pyramid that ordered the murder then had the power to cover it up with lies so big that no reasonable person could believe the US Government has scum in it that would do this.
The acoustic evidence could NOT be changed, it snuck into the HSCA and then the US Government had no choice but to lie about it too, either it is WRONG OR many of the things the US Gov't has always held is FORGED.
X or Y
Gov't has to lie.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
Good luck with that. I would bet any conspiracy person $500,000 that I could prove he did it to a jury. They did this already of course and he was found guilty. My offer stands.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES
We simply need to figure out how to configure a jury then we can each make many times that amount with a documentary that shows you were fooled into believing the biggest lie in history.
You'll notice my picture with Dr Cyril Wecht, that was the FIRST guy I had the pleasure of showing last two shots BANG-BANG scenario to.
His counter arguements weren't any better than yours. Write to David Lifton if you want to know how Dr Wecht handles information that doesn't fit
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
Cyril Wecht is always looking for conspiracies. And he had his day in court. He lost.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES
When I showed Dr Wecht that the last two shots were fired a split second apart he said he had NEVER heard that before.
NEVER?
He was a member of the HSCA and he was the LONE DISSENTING member. I explained to him the reason he dissented and WHY his reasons were consistent with the last two shots being fired 0.7 seconds apart.
HOW Could Dr Wecht have had a convincing argument if he did NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED?
Simple answer, he could not have convinced, he just confused.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES
You and Vince Bugliosi get HBO (for Example) to have another trial. The bet is $100,000.
All I have to prove is the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG which proves conspiracy. I get to use a few witnesses, I don't need many. When key witnesses are dead or won't appear, video of what they said can be used.
HBO will make $millions and you won't miss the $100,000 you loose at all as they will pay us well for finally killing this lie.
I loved RECLAIMING HISTORY!
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
@SCGATOR2001 Are you talking about the "acoustic evidence" off the dicta belt from the motorcycle cop's open microphone? The one which was ultimately shown to be bogus. You have no proof and nothing to show it was anything but Oswald and 3 bullets other than idle fantasy and conjecture.
proferic 2 years ago
The reason we are talking about this "mystery" decades later is that we were lied to. Today, the truth is so ugly about the coup that killed JFK that they will tell any lie.
The audio recording was analyzed by TWO different experts and they independently confirmed that there were multiple shooters who fired shots from different directions. Even w/o the recording the evidence is overwhelming we were lied to
The recording was NOT shown to be bogus by experts who know what they're talking about.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
If you take time and understand just a few details it will all make sense. If you read what fools like Vince Bugliosi write in RECLAIMING HISTORY then you will continue to buy into the BIG LIE.
There is a neat story that all fits together to show you the truth. I know I don't have a pretty published book but I have something you want to see, a consistent story that the witnesses, the films, the doctors all say happened.
The one shooter three shots scenario does not fit together. truth does.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
This video is wrong . Clear video shows that as Kennedy was hit from behind the sign and Connally is hit at the same time. His( Connally ) jacket pops out and watch his hat that he's holding . He's been hit.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
The video is NOT wrong. You are assuming things you have been told are correct when the information is based on LIES.
Connally's lapel moves because he raises his arms at that moment NOT because he is shot in the back. To understand what happened here you MUST understand all of your assumptions that led up to you buying Dale Meyers silly conclusions.
The odds that this video is RIGHT are well over a million to one, in fact they are astronomical.
WHY the confusion? It's simple.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
No. Frame by frame shows his jacket pops out even before he reacts to it. The only lies are the conspiracy nutjobs.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
The Warren Commission said that the only place to line up JFK and Connally for the Single Bullet Theory shot was behind the sign, before Z224.
But Meyer's (I think FAILURE ANALYSIS was first) said the lapel movement was caused by the shot to his back. If that's true, WHERE IS THE BLOOD?
This wasn't a flesh wound, it was major, several inches of Connally's rib was blown out, no blood?
Then Z325, point bullet hit JGC in the back. How did Connally turn to look over his shoulder b4 Z325?
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
I have an answer for this about Connally. There was blood. Did you expect it to blow out of what he was wearing? It wasn't like the Kennedy head wound. The Warren Commission was correct .
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 years ago
Comment removed
Leonides2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That audio recording was proven to be false....
Fact is Connally and Kennedy were hit at the same time nearly with the same bullet....perfectly in line with the book depository building, the conspiracy is a fact though, that the KGB killed Kennedy for their own reasons having to do with John son promising them bolder socialism and cooperation etc.
deltapunk21 2 years ago
You were told that the audio recording was false.
After the first review was done a second set of audio experts reviewed the tape and the analysis confirmed the shot that hit JFK in the head was fired from the right front.
The Justice Dept after the HSCA dropped that bombshell found FOOLS who were not qualified nor did they evaluate ECHO CORRELATION ANALYSIS, they focused on BS and said it's wrong. No one, and I mean NO ONE analyzed the data to disprove it.
Fools like Bugliosi repeat BS.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
yah look at the zapputer film, the driver turns and shoots Kennedy point blank, from the front/right, you even see a flash from the pistol as the driver turns back around, Even people standing nearby say the last shit came from the car, after the SS was told to stand down and leave the motercade?????????
This is a clear case of lets phyco analize facts to confuse everyone to the point of dismay
richierino88 2 years ago
If you watch the video again you'll see that the timing between the Zapruder film and the Acoustic evidence PROVES that the audio evidence is valid. Once you know that you can use the analysis of the audio recording to PROVE where the shots were fired from.
Once you've done that, you KNOW that the 4th shot that hit JFK in the head was fired from the right front. The odds of this being true are astronomical. The driver did not fire any shots.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
and your determining this from some recording that you think is legit?
You have no idea what your talking about, in fact even if the recordings were legit there is no way of telling which direction the shots were coming from, you my freind have some serious issues, you are not a bat, you dont have directional radar lol woooooooow, we got some serious characters on this site lol
richierino88 2 years ago
It's seems impossible at first but here's how they tell where shots were fired from only having a recording: Look at all the REFLECTIONS (echoes) after the shot was fired. Each reflection is delayed depending on how far each object that reflects sound is from the microphone.
Compare the original recording to a recording made later from a shot fired from where you think a shooter was. When the HSCA did this, three shots matched the Texas School Book Dep. & ONE shot matched grassy knoll!
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
You're right to question something that doesn't make sense. When you compare the Film to the information from the audio recording you get things like:
Shot to JFK's head was fired from in front just like anybody who has ever looked at the film thinks
The time between three of the shots is 4.8 seconds & 0.7 seconds (the first two shots you can't see as the car is behind the sign) in both the film and the recording!
Connally is bent over by the shot to his back just like he said happened
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
@richierino88 No way bro search the tube for a vid that will clearly show you that it is not the driver.
kerry1111111 2 years ago
yah the doctored video that anyone can do with a copy of photoshop lol, dude quit suckin the media ball sack, they lie to us everyday you fool....
No real American will ever be Pres again, RIP JFK
richierino88 2 years ago
yah I just don't think it was the driver but i do think that they had him offed no media ball sackin over here my friend!
kerry1111111 2 years ago
The fact is the odds are well over a million to one that Connally was NOT shot in the back when JFK first reacted to a shot.
The reason we are talking about this decades later is that the government's LIE does not match the witnesses, does not match physics nor does it make sense.
I show the documentary BEYOND THE MAGIC BULLET and those idiots showed the SBT is WRONG yet they said they proved that it's possible just like every other idiotic "documentary" does.
You can't explain 4.8 & 0.7 sec.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
The only fact is the Gov. is giving you BS
kerry1111111 2 years ago 2
Ugh there was no need for a magic bullet idiot, the bullet struck Connally and Kennedy went straight as an arrow and clearly came from Oswald's rifle...Arlen Specter is a dumbass who attempted a dumbbass solution to a dumbass hypothesis that was flawed to begin with, it did not take a bunch of turns and dives to hit kenedy than connally.
deltapunk21 2 years ago
You either didn't watch the video OR you didn't understand it. The video clearly shows that the last three shots in BOTH the Z film and the audio recording BOTH show the last three shots were fired 4.8 and 0.7 seconds apart. That PROVES that the audio recording did record the sounds of the shots.
Once you know that, you know when and where 4 of the 5 shots came from. You know the single bullet "theory" is false & you know the government investigations are either flawed or they lied.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
Overall I agree re: Gov't will tell any lie to hide the truth, it's been hijacked by a criminal-corporate-oligarchic cartel. Since seeing James Files' 'confession', I think he may have fired 2nd Kennedy's head-shots -- tho of course he MAY just be a fake glory-seeker. But then, your audio match does NOT fit the official story, all 3 first shots too quick for Oswald's Mannlicher. There may have been 2 rear shooters, ie. another on Daltex roof. The shot was too important to trust to Oswald.
starmanskye 2 years ago
The Driver shot JFK, CiA & FBI controlled by the Rothschild Dynasty had him shot because JFK was going to stop the Federal Reserve Bank from Ripping off the American Tax Payer.
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago
That is a motive but I don't believe anybody had JFK shot but a small powerful group who could change evidence, control investigations and make the press look like absolute idiots.
I think you agree that the video shows there was definitely a conspiracy to kill JFK BUT to cover up the investigation requires real power. That power came from LBJ and J Edgar Hoover, two very corrupt and powerful people. Somebody else may have owned LBJ but right now I think the pointer stops at him and Hoover.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
Bernanke, Geithner, Rubens, Summers, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan & the Federal Reserve Bank know exactly what they are doing by collapsing the US Dollar:
The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and, in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global Monetary Authority [GMA - run directly by international bankers freed of any government control] -a planetary financial control organization" - Bruce Wiseman
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago 2
The Rothschild Dynasty, Vatican, and of course a lot of people are involved just like 911 Inside Job.
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago 2
Killing JFK was an inside job, it was LBJ and J Edgar Hoover preventing both from being exposed as the criminals they were.
9/11 was NOT an inside job, it was a US Government totally incompetent that let a terrorist attack on the US happen when the clowns should have been caught before the first airliner took off.
The 9/11 Commission has one thing in common with the Warren Commission and that is both were manipulated to come up with a "preordained" solution as the truth could NOT be shown
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
I disagree, 911 was an inside job, Cheney owned 43% of Halliburton and Halliburton was at the Supreme court hearing and losing forcing Halliburton to declare bankruptcy, so cheney told bush to attack Iraq. Halliburton ownes all the drills to drill for oil. Our gov. kills people for green bloody money.
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago
The way the BIG LIE is told is that people are taught to come up with any old foolish conspiracy theory and think it makes sense.
It's irrelevant what Cheney owned, what he told Bush because there is EVIDENCE that Iraq was involved. I usually don't waste my time talking about 9/11, if Americans can't understand hard proof in the JFK assassination, they sure can't understand that our government lies to protect American Presidents that are idiots,Clinton was the man who made the DUMBASS mistakes
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
Right on the money.....bullseye....
Money owns this country not freedom thats the problem, endless wars in the name of fake money and fake religions, J
Jews run the globe, look at all the famous people who talked bad about them, Napolean, Henry Ford, ect.....look it up...
Hitler thought noone in America would fight against him cus the Jews were causing the depression and other atrosities, thats why he did it the way he did, we did;nt see it but we do now.....
god bless America
richierino88 2 years ago
Great video, SCGATOR! I'm looking forward to the next parts, when you tell us about that back wound and, most importantly, the one that went straight through the windscreen and hit Kennedy in the throat. Then it will become obvious who the only man could be that started the cover-up that has lasted nearly half a century. Well done!
pimperneldog 2 years ago
Another great video, SCGATOR! Great job! If only the people in Washington did half as well as you on this subject, this crime would have been solved a long time ago..
Steenville 2 years ago
Thanks but think about what you said, you're assuming the crime has not already been solved.
In the video, the shooting mockup shows the bullet that hit JFK in the back would not have exited his throat.
The last three shots fired match perfectly in both the Z film and the audio recording which proves the audio recording did record the sounds of the shots.
The audio analysis shows us WHERE 4 of the 5 shots were fired from.
WHY THE MISTAKES? The Gov't will tell ANY LIE to hide the truth!
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago