My all-time favorite version. I've always felt this somewhat cold, detached VoxBox sound adds to the genius of the piece and performance. I'm sorry, I can't imagine a modern piano recording of this.
I can imagine that for Liszt this is pretty atonal. For our ears it sounds more like IN BETWEEN keys, since diminished chords, that make up a great part of this composition, are traditionally used to slide from one key to another. Brendel touches lightly one "soupçon" of a key after another, like a butterfly fluttering from one flower to another. Great!
I hope i am not the only Person who thinks, that Brendel is absolutely overrated... his pianoplaying is littered with extremely cerebral coldness... just my oppinion, i'm normally a receptive person, but the more i listen to brendel, the more i dislike his style... just compare e.g. Brendels "Czardas Macabre" to Kocsis....
Liszt could also be considered a precursor of the Schönbergian twelve tone technique, his Faust symphony contains an arpeggiated theme that uses the chromatic scale in way that isn't that different from some pieces by Schönberg or Berg.
Scriabin may have had the better approach in creating a liberated language of harmony but Liszts late works are a perfect illustration of why the breakthrough to atonal music was a natural process.
This late Wagnerian stuff is so weird, and I prefer where Scriabin picked up with it, but this is a really great piece and a great performance! Thanks for posting.
Pretty cool stuff, considering this was before atonalism. I don't much care for Liszt''s music in general but I do appreciate his pianism and his compositional pushing of the paradigm.
ncidentally, do you know about Schönberg's religion? I know that he was Jewish, but I do not believe that he was born into a Jewish family. I think that he embraced it later. Do you know?
Schoenberg was born Jewish, converted several times and returned to Judaism. Converting to Christianity in 19th century Austria was the only way for Jews to succeed. Mahler, too, converted to Christianity in order to become director of the Vienna Opera.
Tonality first must be explained. Tonality is the (extremely prominent in nearly all music from the Renaissance till today) musical practice of focusing on one note chosen by the composer, this note known as the tonic. Most chords and melodies will then be played because of their relation to this tonic. Tonality became VERY important in music like Mozart and Haydn. ALL their compositions start and end on the same note. Atonal music simply rebels against this and places equal focus on all notes.
This piece is awesome and certainly an oddity for its time, but it's decidedly not atonal. If you want atonal, listen to Schoenberg or Boulez. In the end, it doesn't really matter as long as it's great music.
It depends on how you define 'atonal'. Compared with extremes like Schönberg or Boulez, it sounds more tonal, but this is because his method of achieving atonality is often more like a rapid switching of tonalities, which shocked people at the time. Compared with his contemporaries, this was definitely atonal. Either way, in my opinion, I find this more musical than Schönberg (whose music I love) or Boulez (do not love his so much).
Chopin had apparently accused Liszt of being striving for eccentric effects, but.... this very thing is what made Liszt the father of modern music. By using whatever technique it took to express never before captured tonal expressions he freed up the palette for composers that came after him... Debussy, Ravel, Scriabin, Stravinsky, and so on.
Nobody had expressed those shades of life and human experience before, the whimsical moments that eluded so many others, Liszt captured with his technique
@abluesman100 Qua Listz dimostra ampiamente di essere un vero portatore sano di Musica, soprattutto un pianista il quale ha intuito l'intero spirito dello strumento. Infatti non fatica ad esprimerne ed esaltarne- talvolta esasperarne- le qualità e peculiarità sonore , traducendo pari pari lo spirito stesso della Musica. Onore al Maestro, il cui udito sentiva ben oltre il sensibile, per accedere senza filtri e senza coscienza all'armonia universale- ed interiore- che regge tutto ciò che esiste.
i think it is quite remarkable, that this bagatelle was not published before 1955, and the complete science about who developed the atonalité has strongly forgotten this approach by Liszt. Sure there is still a huge gap beetween this atonalité, meaning the lack of a tonal centre, and the atonalité , developed by Schönberg, meanig the emancipation of the dissonance., but i think this bagatelle is a nice approach showing, how things could have develloped, if one had paid attention to liszt.
People actually *loved* Schönberg; my composition teacher went to a college at which they taught the twelve-tone method of composition nearly exclusively. He refused to do it. He did not find it beautiful. Now, however, he is teaching it to us.
Yeah, it's funny how his reception changes during time :) what i meant was that many people opposed schönberg's method in his time. nowadays he is sometimes celebrated as the pioneer of a whole new musical world, hehe
It is true. Part of the problem was that the Germans (where he originally lived) did not approve of it, even though it sounds very German to me, and is now often seen as the next step of Romanticism after Wagner and Liszt. I think that it is a great form of musical composition, to achieve certain goals, at least. I am about to start my first twelve-tone piece to-day for that class.
heh, composing something sounds great :) ... just one note (myself being a german living in vienna): austrians don't really like being called germans xD if i remember correctly, schönberg lived only for 1 year in germany (berlin)
I had not known that. I have wondered about that, actually. That is very interesting. Is it a strong opposition, or just that they prefer to be known as Austrian? I study German culture and history, and I write, read, and sing German rather well. I can even speak it, but only fairly well. However, I was referring to the Nazi party, who were (mostly) German. They were the reason that Schönberg left Europe to become Schoenberg.
Well, the relationship between Austrians and Germans is a bit complicated. The Nazis referred to all German-speaking people to as Germans. Today, it's as bad as calling a Scotsman British ;D (by the way, why is your post marked as spam? oO)
I understand. That makes a lot of sense (Scotsmen are none too happy being thought of as simply 'British', I do know).
I removed my post because I had put a full stop after 'Austrian' instead of a question mark, so I fixed it and posted it again.
Incidentally, do you know about Schönberg's religion? I know that he was Jewish, but I do not believe that he was born into a Jewish family. I think that he embraced it later. Do you know?
The difference between Brendel's approach to Liszt and that of the typical keyboard virtuoso is that Brendel is far more interested in showcasing Liszt the composer rather than Liszt the wizard of the keyboard. He is one of hose who perceives that Liszt's music had far-reaching influence on the music of composers who succeeded him and that this influence would even extend into the 20th century.
I agree that it is excellent playing. He's played Liszt through his entire career, from some of the Hungarian Rhapsodies and etudes early on to the Sonata and the later piano pieces, which he'd performed many times live and has recorded. I've wished that he would have performed more varied programs in the last 15 or so years -- not that I entirely mind Schubert, Beethoven, and Haydn at all (!), but a little more variety would have shown us all his scope as a monumental pianist.
This lack of variety influenced that Philips Collection that Brendel supported in organizing, the XXth Century Great Pianists (or something like that). There you have a lot of great pianists playing basically the same basic repertoir.
But I still admire Brendel very much. In Liszt he gave more lucid interpretations than others.
Scriabin could have not possibly influenced music, since he was 13 years old when this piece was written. Its more likely that Liszt influenced Scriabin.
The 'Bagatelle sans tonalité' is - as suggested by its title - a piece by which Liszt showed music how to escape from the tyranny of tonality. One way to play it is to make this apparent to the educated ear and I think Brendel succeeded in that respect. Obviously, there are other ways to interpret this piece and they will be more or less in accordance with your preference.
If I didn't know it was by Liszt, I would have guess Scriabin.
achan1058 1 month ago
@achan1058 Or Hindemith
leoquis888 3 weeks ago
What is truly incredible is that Liszt lived long enough to have gone from the Romantic period to the beginning of atonality.
1seakyr 2 months ago
My all-time favorite version. I've always felt this somewhat cold, detached VoxBox sound adds to the genius of the piece and performance. I'm sorry, I can't imagine a modern piano recording of this.
auerod 3 months ago
Varese you're completely right about the genious of LISZT/composer and the understanding by Brendel who is an intellectual of the music!!
jeanlucchapelon 4 months ago
it's not a strange piece, it's a very difficult one, and for the time it had been composed really something new!
fcotugno 6 months ago
Great sound!
LovorkaND 8 months ago
I can imagine that for Liszt this is pretty atonal. For our ears it sounds more like IN BETWEEN keys, since diminished chords, that make up a great part of this composition, are traditionally used to slide from one key to another. Brendel touches lightly one "soupçon" of a key after another, like a butterfly fluttering from one flower to another. Great!
nielswalen 8 months ago
After listening to 20th century pieces, you can see how advanced this piece was.
paolosilv 9 months ago
I hope i am not the only Person who thinks, that Brendel is absolutely overrated... his pianoplaying is littered with extremely cerebral coldness... just my oppinion, i'm normally a receptive person, but the more i listen to brendel, the more i dislike his style... just compare e.g. Brendels "Czardas Macabre" to Kocsis....
Benne86piano 9 months ago
@Benne86piano You can't even imagine how much I agree with you. His "greatness" is always was big puzzle for me. Just mannered and shallow musician.
rva25 4 months ago
sounds more "diminished" than anything. though at the time, I'm sure this use of the diminished scale & diminished chords sounded quite progressive.
rhapsodyinblue18 10 months ago
This is where atonality begun I guess.
DeimosGT 10 months ago
Liszt could also be considered a precursor of the Schönbergian twelve tone technique, his Faust symphony contains an arpeggiated theme that uses the chromatic scale in way that isn't that different from some pieces by Schönberg or Berg.
Scriabin may have had the better approach in creating a liberated language of harmony but Liszts late works are a perfect illustration of why the breakthrough to atonal music was a natural process.
playingmusiconmars 10 months ago
he must have been on opium lol.. good stuff though
BigBents 11 months ago
This piece goes great together with Prokofiev's "Suggestion Diabolique" =D
cafity 1 year ago
barely atonal.....if atonal at all...
coolguy9610 1 year ago
@coolguy9610 Sounds pretty atonal to me. Not the most atonal of music written of course.
OriginalBasaliskos 11 months ago
barely atonal.....
coolguy9610 1 year ago
Grande Alfredo!!
schonklang 1 year ago
This late Wagnerian stuff is so weird, and I prefer where Scriabin picked up with it, but this is a really great piece and a great performance! Thanks for posting.
petezilla 1 year ago
Who said Schoenberg was the father of atonal music?
PuresMusic 1 year ago
Pretty cool stuff, considering this was before atonalism. I don't much care for Liszt''s music in general but I do appreciate his pianism and his compositional pushing of the paradigm.
flylooper 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So he invented atonality?
lanzfriszt 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ncidentally, do you know about Schönberg's religion? I know that he was Jewish, but I do not believe that he was born into a Jewish family. I think that he embraced it later. Do you know?
Schoenberg was born Jewish, converted several times and returned to Judaism. Converting to Christianity in 19th century Austria was the only way for Jews to succeed. Mahler, too, converted to Christianity in order to become director of the Vienna Opera.
Varese13 1 year ago
I love strange pieces. I also like the 2. transcendente etude, it has something ghosty, something gloomy. Marvellous !!
gorgalsi 1 year ago
Can someone please expalin Atonality in a easy enough way for me to understand please?
ADyingFaith 1 year ago
Tonality first must be explained. Tonality is the (extremely prominent in nearly all music from the Renaissance till today) musical practice of focusing on one note chosen by the composer, this note known as the tonic. Most chords and melodies will then be played because of their relation to this tonic. Tonality became VERY important in music like Mozart and Haydn. ALL their compositions start and end on the same note. Atonal music simply rebels against this and places equal focus on all notes.
Divinemetal 1 year ago
Thank you for the explanation.
ADyingFaith 1 year ago
You are most welcome, friend.
Divinemetal 1 year ago
This piece is awesome and certainly an oddity for its time, but it's decidedly not atonal. If you want atonal, listen to Schoenberg or Boulez. In the end, it doesn't really matter as long as it's great music.
LevMysh68 2 years ago
It depends on how you define 'atonal'. Compared with extremes like Schönberg or Boulez, it sounds more tonal, but this is because his method of achieving atonality is often more like a rapid switching of tonalities, which shocked people at the time. Compared with his contemporaries, this was definitely atonal. Either way, in my opinion, I find this more musical than Schönberg (whose music I love) or Boulez (do not love his so much).
Divinemetal 1 year ago
Chopin had apparently accused Liszt of being striving for eccentric effects, but.... this very thing is what made Liszt the father of modern music. By using whatever technique it took to express never before captured tonal expressions he freed up the palette for composers that came after him... Debussy, Ravel, Scriabin, Stravinsky, and so on.
Nobody had expressed those shades of life and human experience before, the whimsical moments that eluded so many others, Liszt captured with his technique
8aetroya8 2 years ago
awesome piece by a musical genius Liszt... Liszt inspired so many diverse schools of music composition.
8aetroya8 2 years ago
A very nervous and full-of-strain piece! I wonder if Liszt was ill when he was composing it.
f1f1s 2 years ago
this is a strange piece
abluesman100 2 years ago 18
@abluesman100 Qua Listz dimostra ampiamente di essere un vero portatore sano di Musica, soprattutto un pianista il quale ha intuito l'intero spirito dello strumento. Infatti non fatica ad esprimerne ed esaltarne- talvolta esasperarne- le qualità e peculiarità sonore , traducendo pari pari lo spirito stesso della Musica. Onore al Maestro, il cui udito sentiva ben oltre il sensibile, per accedere senza filtri e senza coscienza all'armonia universale- ed interiore- che regge tutto ciò che esiste.
TheNicosse 9 months ago
i think it is quite remarkable, that this bagatelle was not published before 1955, and the complete science about who developed the atonalité has strongly forgotten this approach by Liszt. Sure there is still a huge gap beetween this atonalité, meaning the lack of a tonal centre, and the atonalité , developed by Schönberg, meanig the emancipation of the dissonance., but i think this bagatelle is a nice approach showing, how things could have develloped, if one had paid attention to liszt.
deadcalledpark 2 years ago 2
well, liszt stopped going into this direction because people didn't like it. schönberg just didn't care about that...
Elfenohr 2 years ago 2
People actually *loved* Schönberg; my composition teacher went to a college at which they taught the twelve-tone method of composition nearly exclusively. He refused to do it. He did not find it beautiful. Now, however, he is teaching it to us.
Divinemetal 1 year ago
Yeah, it's funny how his reception changes during time :) what i meant was that many people opposed schönberg's method in his time. nowadays he is sometimes celebrated as the pioneer of a whole new musical world, hehe
Elfenohr 1 year ago
It is true. Part of the problem was that the Germans (where he originally lived) did not approve of it, even though it sounds very German to me, and is now often seen as the next step of Romanticism after Wagner and Liszt. I think that it is a great form of musical composition, to achieve certain goals, at least. I am about to start my first twelve-tone piece to-day for that class.
Divinemetal 1 year ago
heh, composing something sounds great :) ... just one note (myself being a german living in vienna): austrians don't really like being called germans xD if i remember correctly, schönberg lived only for 1 year in germany (berlin)
Elfenohr 1 year ago
Comment removed
Divinemetal 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I had not known that. I have wondered about that, actually. That is very interesting. Is it a strong opposition, or just that they prefer to be known as Austrian? I study German culture and history, and I write, read, and sing German rather well. I can even speak it, but only fairly well. However, I was referring to the Nazi party, who were (mostly) German. They were the reason that Schönberg left Europe to become Schoenberg.
Divinemetal 1 year ago
Well, the relationship between Austrians and Germans is a bit complicated. The Nazis referred to all German-speaking people to as Germans. Today, it's as bad as calling a Scotsman British ;D (by the way, why is your post marked as spam? oO)
Elfenohr 1 year ago
I understand. That makes a lot of sense (Scotsmen are none too happy being thought of as simply 'British', I do know).
I removed my post because I had put a full stop after 'Austrian' instead of a question mark, so I fixed it and posted it again.
Incidentally, do you know about Schönberg's religion? I know that he was Jewish, but I do not believe that he was born into a Jewish family. I think that he embraced it later. Do you know?
Divinemetal 1 year ago
I wrote you a pm about the details :)
Elfenohr 1 year ago
"First victims of Nazism"-shtick and all; still a joke.
hoink23 1 year ago
The difference between Brendel's approach to Liszt and that of the typical keyboard virtuoso is that Brendel is far more interested in showcasing Liszt the composer rather than Liszt the wizard of the keyboard. He is one of hose who perceives that Liszt's music had far-reaching influence on the music of composers who succeeded him and that this influence would even extend into the 20th century.
Varese52 2 years ago 11
Sounds like Debussy in the beggining
henseltetude 2 years ago
I agree that it is excellent playing. He's played Liszt through his entire career, from some of the Hungarian Rhapsodies and etudes early on to the Sonata and the later piano pieces, which he'd performed many times live and has recorded. I've wished that he would have performed more varied programs in the last 15 or so years -- not that I entirely mind Schubert, Beethoven, and Haydn at all (!), but a little more variety would have shown us all his scope as a monumental pianist.
3cplantin 2 years ago
This lack of variety influenced that Philips Collection that Brendel supported in organizing, the XXth Century Great Pianists (or something like that). There you have a lot of great pianists playing basically the same basic repertoir.
But I still admire Brendel very much. In Liszt he gave more lucid interpretations than others.
leomulder 2 years ago
sounds a like Scriabin was influenced by this style. I recall those glissando like things in Scriabin's late works. Ex. 1:09-1:13
Kalen1457 2 years ago
Scriabin could have not possibly influenced music, since he was 13 years old when this piece was written. Its more likely that Liszt influenced Scriabin.
iamalittlespy 2 years ago
Thats what I was saying...maybe you were just reading my statement wrong.
Kalen1457 2 years ago
You're absolutely right. Sorry, I did misread your statement.
iamalittlespy 2 years ago
The 'Bagatelle sans tonalité' is - as suggested by its title - a piece by which Liszt showed music how to escape from the tyranny of tonality. One way to play it is to make this apparent to the educated ear and I think Brendel succeeded in that respect. Obviously, there are other ways to interpret this piece and they will be more or less in accordance with your preference.
BernhardBang 2 years ago
Comment removed
Neilhoven 2 years ago
Beautiful. Maybe a bit uneven, but very stylized, clear and crisp.
aldebussy 3 years ago
Why do you say that?Please explain.I am willing to learn.
abmsghost 3 years ago
Alfred Brendel isn't the first pianist I think of when it comes to Liszt, but this is fine playing indeed. Thanks for the post.
Galantski 3 years ago 2