I really like the way the interview challenges Seligman's view. This is very rare in media these days, especially in Aust. Well done to the interviewer. Its not that I disagree with Seligman in any way but I do think we need to challenge people more on what they claim as 'fact'.
I heard about people killing themselves out of misery but I have never heard about people killing themselves because they felt happy or recently learned how to be happy. What is more "dangerous"? I truly like the fact that they bring lessons on emotional security to schools. Particularly Teens need that.
Its the geat debate between a philosopher (british interviewer) and the psychologist (dr. seligman)--One seems to only pose questions while the other tries to answer each one. It would better if both asked questions and both answered questions.. By doing this, I think you'd have a better debate and they would actually go somewhere. Just my thought.
The interviewer first describes the stuff Seligman talks about "banale". Then he, quoting a sociologist, wonders if Seligmans program is "dangerous". Finally, he refuses to acknowledge the research that shows that the brits are more depressed than other Europeans.
I think the guy decided to disagree with whatever Seligman would say when he woke up that morning.
I don't think the interviewer is trying to show that the stuff Seligman talks about is bunch of shit. I think the interviewer is simply trying to get more into the problem by introducing "what other people would think" (which is not necessarily what himself is thinking). He he simply introducing different and opposed points of view!
Dear BBC, Great channel, great interview, thanks for posting this; however- where is the end of the segment? Also, the audio is not synced with the video. Thanks
Seligman, u r making this world a better place! Thank u, with all my heart. Love from Norway<3
paakledning 3 weeks ago
Anyone know where the rest of the interview is?
JT2012a 1 month ago
I really like the way the interview challenges Seligman's view. This is very rare in media these days, especially in Aust. Well done to the interviewer. Its not that I disagree with Seligman in any way but I do think we need to challenge people more on what they claim as 'fact'.
JT2012a 1 month ago
Dear BBC...i'm agreeing with "flexible" & also with "Eksit"---
I'll check back for an answer to the question posed to you---3 yrs ago! cheers!
trustingChristalone 10 months ago
.... and part 4 -?
:/
bavalina 11 months ago
as brits would say, this BBC interviewer is a "bloody bastard"...
technotony1227 1 year ago
@technotony1227 but nevertheless good for democracy. You should challenge things!
JT2012a 1 month ago
Typical Pom Interviewer being pessimistic and cant see it.
MalMcCullough 1 year ago
I heard about people killing themselves out of misery but I have never heard about people killing themselves because they felt happy or recently learned how to be happy. What is more "dangerous"? I truly like the fact that they bring lessons on emotional security to schools. Particularly Teens need that.
Ivorybird09 2 years ago
where is part 4?
steakabuser 2 years ago
Its the geat debate between a philosopher (british interviewer) and the psychologist (dr. seligman)--One seems to only pose questions while the other tries to answer each one. It would better if both asked questions and both answered questions.. By doing this, I think you'd have a better debate and they would actually go somewhere. Just my thought.
chadmdixon 2 years ago 3
The interviewer first describes the stuff Seligman talks about "banale". Then he, quoting a sociologist, wonders if Seligmans program is "dangerous". Finally, he refuses to acknowledge the research that shows that the brits are more depressed than other Europeans.
I think the guy decided to disagree with whatever Seligman would say when he woke up that morning.
EksitGhost 3 years ago 17
I don't think the interviewer is trying to show that the stuff Seligman talks about is bunch of shit. I think the interviewer is simply trying to get more into the problem by introducing "what other people would think" (which is not necessarily what himself is thinking). He he simply introducing different and opposed points of view!
spasibaspasibavic 3 years ago 3
that's why its called hardtalk.
nspeert 3 years ago
Dr Seligman doesn't look that happy
cybersphere 3 years ago
But he has that pretty flower on his lapel, so I think he must have been happy getting dressed for the interview.
I think the interviewer brought him down.
totallybarefoot 3 years ago 3
lol
RemsUnheardofArmy 3 years ago
He's a great interviewer. It's called HARDtalk for a reason. He asks the tough questions.
chickenhouse 3 years ago
seligman is a distinguished academic. The interviewer is clearly not academically inclined and he comes across as a retard.
chewtheredpill 3 years ago
this interviewer is demented. he is not even listening to what Seligman is saying at all.
MidstreamHorse 3 years ago 4
Dear BBC, Great channel, great interview, thanks for posting this; however- where is the end of the segment? Also, the audio is not synced with the video. Thanks
flexibleoptimism 4 years ago 7