NOT A CHANCE

[savana906]

Simply brilliant!

God bless.

[Colimaniac]

so this video is saying that Science couldn't have made itself.....So this video is rising the fact that an all seeing being randomly created the universe in 7 DAYS? impossible to both

[MrJurekGG]

How long would it take for a bunch of monkies to write the bible?

Exactly: 43776587688098 years !

Yet - it happened!

[questionsamson]

Since when did evolution have to do with the beginning of the universe?

[EvolutionaryMind]

No one knows how the universe was made! Evolution is not the beggining of the universe! It is impossible to say if the universe was created by god or by chance! Watch more videos and research before posting! You will get more respect!

[perfectioninheaven]

well, thats 3 videos watched and 3 faved.....so far :)

God Bless

Mike

UK

[robertmcmc]

So, they are w/o excuse. For although they knew God they did not honor Him as God or give thanks to Him. But they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools.

[Ads4Christ]

Either a higher force made the world or it made itself. There are no other options. Since 99% of all evolutions DON'T believe an intelligent power made it, by implication, that leaves only one option.

[lowcomedy]

Ah, false dichotomy. Ever consider the possibility that "god' uses natural means?

You do realize that "god' is neither demonstrable or even a logical construct?

Probably not.

If an intelligence were indeed responsible through what methods and where did that intelligence come from in the first place?

How do you even go about testing such an intellectually vacuous assertion?

[brianblackberry]

Things don't magically make themselves, everything in the cosmos works according to laws of nature. Planetary formation is explainable in a purely naturalistic way using physics and chemistry.

[davemakesawave]

That is correct and that evidences that the universe was created by the law maker. It was this understanding of the origin of the universe being the God of the Bible that enabled the great Christian scientists of old to advance science so rapidly, versus the Chinese atheists of that same era who despite having some good technological knowledge made little progress in science as they did not approach the subject from an understanding that uniformity comes from God.

[brianblackberry]

Rapidly, like in those 1000 years before the Renaissance were pathetically little scientific achievement occurred? Or perhaps when they started off the knowledge of their Arabic-Persian and Greek forbears? Chinese were atheists during these times? If you think that, you know pathetically little about Chinese history or culture, which really doesn't surprise me.

As for natural laws of the universe, that comes from the four fundamental forces of the universe.

[7olusegun]

And yet not only do molecules form, far more complex ones necessary for life occurs. If life arose randomly, man would have long been able to create life from non-living chemicals with irrefutable proof. Despite today's advancements in science etc not a shred of life had been created by man from abiogenic molecules. This is because it is not possible to be done no matter how hard man tries. If life occurred spontaneously why then is there no life found on other planets despite life's resilience?

[brianblackberry]

Ok, stop, I need to ask, did you watch any of the videos I have left links to? If not, then this is pointless, as you are not even willing to look. After all, they talk about how in various solutions, more complex molecules can be and were formed. Also, just because we haven't been able to create simple lifeforms, doesn't mean it is impossible in nature. We can't create a cure for cancer right now, does that mean such a cure will always be impossible?

[7olusegun]

The link you sent to me did not go through or was inaccessible. You may test it yourself. That aside, finding a cure for a cancer disease is far, far more plausible than creating life from non living matter (or a bundle of abiogenic synthetic molecules). Since antiquated times, man had worked hard in order to stop the aging process (and possibly death) by producing 'elixirs' concotions but with no success. It is NOT POSSIBLE for man to create life from non living molecules & will never never be.

[earthalien77]

***If evolution is true, then why aren't we all still 'evolving'??? And, why would we not have wings???

[7olusegun]

Evolution is foolery, evil & godless. It staunchly produces the mindset of the likes of Hitler and Stalin as well as the new-age (Nicholaitan) attitude which only leads to destruction. If the world was formed by chance and life was formed via evolution, then the latter would inevitably had long become extinct (long even before it had formed at all) while the former (world) would never had formed at all considering the physical natural universal laws of science. There must be a creator somewhere.

[MultiArchangel]

Not a chance. Never was and never will be.....lol :)

[Afrikitty]

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, also known as Entropy, which is UNIVERSALLY accepted by ALL scientists, unless they are very, very foolish, states, all things are decaying at a given rate. It has been so since the beginning of time and if true would be the antithises of all that evolution teaches, as decaying matter cannot produce life.

God said, "In the beginning GOD created the heavens and the earth" He did not leave this open to debate as he finished each day off with morning and evening!

[ocpud2999]

Ok You made a good statement stating your objection. Then you go off and made yourself invalid by taking a good point and calling someone a name. ad hominem attacks merely make you lose any point you may had.

[Ads4Christ]

My friend, if you want to respectfully disagree, that's fine. If you want to call those who disagree with you, stupid, we'll just remove you from the discussion. Your choice my friend.

[lowcomedy]

Your position IS intellectually vacuous, (a far cry from stupid) you're making a baseless assertion, a 'god of the gaps fallacy', along with a false dichotomy and interpreting every criticism as insult.

Again, tell me the mechanism of how intelligence created everything, who/what that intelligence is and how you actually test for it.

[Ads4Christ]

Well...I guess you have chosen. Goodbye my friend!

[7olusegun]

Right on target; even themodynamic 2nd law shows that systems drive towards maximum entropy (i.e. greater disorderliness). Now, even a single cell contains highly complex and ORDERLY complementary organelles necessary for its life. For this to form at random would have been very, very highly impossible as the 2nd law would had made this unique cell design fall to pieces (disorderliness) long even before it can form. Even this law shows that a designer must exist. Pro-evolutionists are very mad!

[brianblackberry]

No we are not mad, because you need to read the details on themodynamics and how entropy refers to a closed system. The Earth is an open system, it receives energy, if you don't believe me, go outside during the day, you soon figure out where it comes from.

[7olusegun]

I'm still not convinced. Ok, could you reasonably and scientifically explain how a single unicellular organism's complex organelles manage to form in such a way that they are complimentary to each other for the living of the cell's activities? How did the incredibly complex DNA/RNA and protein molecules form exactly from scratch and in such a way that very different molecules or tissues incorporated complementary to each other for life to emanate in the cell? How did life also come after this?

[brianblackberry]

Since explaining cellular evolution and biology, not to mention abiogenesis in 500 characters is impossible, I suggest starting with this:

watch?v=v8nYTJf62sE

Things started far more simply, and in essence all life from the simplest to the most complex is in its base, chemical. We are extremely subtle and complex molecular machines.

[davemakesawave]

The Earth receives energy and also releases it in cooling. Universal energy is conserved according to physics, in which case where did it come from?  The answer has been in the Bible right from the beginning.

[brianblackberry]

"in which case where did it come from?"

The energy the Earth receives? It's called the sun, you see it everyday and its effects are obvious.

[7olusegun]

What I am saying in summary is that God is behind the creation of all things; both living and non living materials and that evolution (either of living or non living materials) CAN NEVER, NEVER occur either spontaneously or randomly in any way. Even if it were possible at all that things materialized randomly (if at all), what is/are the mechanisms responsible for the triggering of these 'spontaneous random existences'? Your answer regarding the cell question is ambiguous and not rational.

[brianblackberry]

Did you watch the video? I can provide more, but only if you are willing to watch.

Now if you want to believe some divine being started the Big Bang, fine. There is no proof of that, but no one knows what initiated the Big Bang itself. We just now about the event, not what caused it. Of course saying a divine being started it doesn't mean a particular religion's created mythology is right.

[7olusegun]

All I know is that a creator created the universe. Scientific laws we know today cannot explain (even to an infinitessimal degree) how it came into existence from nothing (as everything including all the physical fundamental laws, constants etc all materialised from nothingness). The big bang may or may not be true (though it is likely to be) and it ties very well with creation. Even the fundamental laws never materialised from nothing on its own as the probability of this is very impossible.

[brianblackberry]

Natural selection is deterministic, mutation is random. As for none living material forming more complex molecules, well we see that all the time, as it happens all the time. As for the mechanisms possible, that is what the laws of nature are, based on the four fundamental forces of the universe.

[7olusegun]

Even the so called 'evolution' you are so mentally involved in, evolutionists can never logically explain how life formed from the very beginning. What has 'determinism; mutation and randomness' got to do with or explain how the very different organelles in a simple cell 'came together' to be complimentary for the cell's survival or living metabolisms? Your 'answers' are vague & evasive. What are the exact mechanisms that occurred that led to the coming together of complimentary cell organelles?

[brianblackberry]

Typical all or nothing behavior, assuming the first life were complex cells. Protobionts were the likely precursor to prokaryotic cells and earliest life, beginning as nothing more then a RNA strand surrounded by a membrane, likely of simple lipids. This allowed for a homeostatic environment and replication, two of the basic definitions for life, bordering between living and "non-living". Basically all life is chemical.

Better and longer explanation: watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg

[7olusegun]

What exactly triggered the mechanisms for the arrangement of molecules into nucleic acids; the exact enzymes required and the formation of the protobiots? It has been shown that even atoms & molecules are 'concretions' of orderly discrete energy. According to the law of thermodynamics, (which says everything heads towards a maximum disorderliness), the probability of even atoms forming is infinitesimally small. All of scientific laws testify that random atom & molecular formation is impossible.

[brianblackberry]

Afrikitty, that applies only to a closed system and is about the transfer of heat from a warm body to a cold one until they each the same state.

Just a FYI from us in science. :)

[7olusegun]

Even an atheist once confessed that the probability of molecules arranging in such a complex manner just for a non living cell to form is 1/1000...(40 thousand ciphers) at best estimate and that for life to materialize even after that is even far much smaller. Yet there are many millions of species of living organisms alive. To say these formed at random is very absurd to say the very least. Do you have reasonable scientific explanations to cross the probability hurdles?

[davemakesawave]

So true. There is in fact no possibility whatsoever that life did not start without God. That is the heart of the matter and otherwise a load of fossils dont prove anything at all.

[gloryboundkev]

If everything created itself, then why aren't things popping out of nowhere everyday? scientific laws are things seen everyday, they are observed,and can be repeated and proven. there can be no creation without a creator.

[iToyRobot]

great video, everyone should watch Darwin's Dilemma

[MultiArchangel]

Have you seen Climbing Mount Impossible? It talks about the statistical probability of evolution. You should type it in and look at it sister.

[iToyRobot]

@MultiArchangel i think it was mentioned in part 7 of the Darwin's Dilemma series i saw, you can watch it in my favorites box, its a must see

[MultiArchangel]

Yeah. It mentions the same argument against evolution as what is seen in this video. :)

[SAUNDERSacts2618]

Thanks for sending me this!

[MultiArchangel]

No problem Saunders. :)

[MultiArchangel]

Great great work. I saw a video similar to this. More or less. Scientists have said that the odds of using mutations to create complex organisms is so great that it cannot be possible. The number of creating a complex organism randomly was enormous. I can't even remember the number. Many blessings and great work. I am going to share this with others.

[Heavenfirst]

People are indeed, without excuse, for not believing in our Creator, God.

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities; His eternal power and divine naturehave been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse {Romans 1:20} Since we see that creation is true, then there is a *Creator* to whom we are accountable ~> That would be God :)

TY Jan ~ a great share as always brother.

God Bless

YSIC ~ Claire

[Ads4Christ]

If there is no God, you're right. But then again, if there IS a God, I would suspect that He could most likely do anything He wants, even create something out of nothing. That said, I find that much more likely than believing a world can create itself...out of nothing. That thats a lot of faith.

[Inga4020]

It is not a hard thing for the Lord of all Creation to do. The earth 'seems' very old according to the evidence that men have found so far. We do see thru a glass very darkly... Yet, I recall that Jesus' first miracle was to take water and make it into something (wine) that was old and very well developed and refined. It was the talk of the party as I recall.

[InHISWord2]

Are evolutionists still looking for the missing link? Happy Day...I found him...the missing link is GOD!

[brianblackberry]

Nope, the "missing link" is a quaint 19th century idea that the media still uses but long ago in science that issue have been solved.

[Lachance8]

Just got back in town and catching up on vids. This is a great one, Jan. If this does not make people think Nothing will!

[Jairson777]

AMEN bro this was a very good video hopefully this video will start getting people to think.

[rorromcc]

Great video brother!!! Our Lord is so Great!!!

God bless you!

[mamy101]

Wonderful video brother.GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Has always been here.Praise his name.

Bless you,

Mary

[indychristian]

The terms 'chance' and 'random' are only terms of convenience to explain things not understood. Since the scientific method is based on cause & effect, by definition no effect can be concluded to be 'chance' or 'random'.

And yet, as the video explains, these terms of convenience have been used -- ironically by scientists -- to explain away the obvious: that there is a God, and we're obligated to know Him, obey Him... and as it turns out, even to enjoy Him and the peace & salvation He offers.

[deluxo7]

Very good my brotha! I just don't get how the world just randomly came to play along with other planets.

[sexywildchildbaby]

Just ask them, where did monkeys come from :)

atheist will fight all the way back to big bang, and I'll say who made space...LOL

Great video...God Bless

[sincitypreacher]

Great video Brother. You always do an excellent job on your videos. The content and production is 5*.