plane crash - ba 009

[NBOY851]

This was not a plane crash.



[bluedalmatian]

"im really good for a cold soda!" somehow i cant imagine a BA pilot coming out with that.

These US TV companies really ought to research other countries cultures more

[Snowman374th]

Sounds like they were attacked by H.A.A.P.

[harismahmood1234]

ive seen the whole program

[dumboe8899]

"I don't know how to swim!"

If that's what you're worried about when you might possibly hurdle into the mountains at 500mph, then you have seriously misplaced priorities.

As for air safety, the last time an A330 crashed, it was blown up by the US navy. An Air Transat A330 glided 130 miles to an Air Force base in the middle of the Atlantic. An Air France A340 overran the runway at Toronto Pearson, completely broke up, all 309 passengers and crew alive.

[t9darlantan]

Funny how the captain sayed : We have a small problem all four engines have stoped.

[richl]

Good old Rolls Royce quality engineering

[erimtuna]

what was the light?

[revengeofthecookie]

That was caused by volcanic ashes from an eruption below flight 009.

[Blatpoppin5]

i think that they shud invent some button or somethin to drop all the engines off the wing, so that planes that have engines on the wing could have safer water landings...some idea like that

[bigguy252]

thats the dumbest thing i have ever heard

[Blatpoppin5]

but of it could happen wont it safe lots of lives

[blampa]

Airbus hasn't been in the game anywhere near as long as boeing so the numbers quoted by burrichello are disproportionate. Wait though until the scarebus Gay380 takes to the skies and crashes due to the cracking glare in the tailplane, not to mention the FAILED wing stress test. Chunka shit scarebus subsidised by nationalistic government of surrender monkeys.

[FusilliJerry82]

Fuck your US bashing.

Gee, I wonder why the 737 has so many related fatalities. Oh, its probably the fact that there's been 737s produced than all Airbus A3xx series and has been in production 4 years longer than the A300 alone. And the A320 had 4.21 deaths per plane produced while the 707 had 2.05 deaths per plane.

Plus above it all, these death figures are ALL fatalities, not just ones involving mechanical failure. That's an analyzation that would take a bit of time.

[FusilliJerry82]

Model, Number Procuced, Approx. Deaths, Years in Production 707/720--1,010--2908-20 717--156--NA-8 727--1,832--3702-21 737-5,439--4779-39 747--1,387--2850-38 757--1,050--467-22 767--953--569-25 777--642--NA-13 A300--561--2362-33 A310--255--637-24 A320--3,153--535-20 A330--481--NA-15 A340--346--NA-16 A380--9--NA-2

[ImmortalSynn]

The A330 numbers are incorrect so far as fatalities go. Several crew members were killed in an accident during early A330 testing.

[FusilliJerry82]

Even better to support my point.

[zenrising]

I'm sick of seeing your stinking name come up on ever one of these videos. Get lost and preach your propaganda to someone else. Loser.

[cjracer1000]

well those numbers are inaccurate unless you start the date at a certain time and end it at a certain time 737 has had a longer time in service

i think you should start the counting of the deaths at the same time that the a32x came out then count that

otherwise it is completely inaccurate

and

when the 737 came out first it was made with the technology of that time time

[GrimReaperOf06]

they should of died

[heathfiedler]

that was cool thought i don't think the people ont hat plane would say so..lol

[burrichello]

WTF is this??? Pilots did everything right...that Boeing airplanes are just crap...search Youtube Videos of Airplane crashes...in 90% of them you can see a Boeing crap envolved directly and many lives killed... Boeing Sucks...

[cjracer1000]

hmmm??

if boeing is crap then why are 3/4 airlinrs in the sky boeings

o well i guess the airlines dont kno what they want in a plane huh?

[GloriousSky]

man don't pay attention to people like that , they forgot that boeing company is way older then airbus , and because of that its normal they had more challanges or maybe accedints then airbus , they are the first and the best in the making of commercail jets

[olschooler]

What it was was a volcano had erupted either that day or the day before and it was ash and soot.The day after the flight they were inspecting the damage and the engines were almost totally clogged with the stuff, when you see the pictures of the damage it really was AMAZING that they even fired again.The windshield was almost impossible to see out of because this stuff had sand blasted the windshield, also the paint looked like somebody had taken a sand blaster to a lot of that too.

[sirlordwhitman]

Soooo glad they survived. What was that bright phenomena that caused them to stall in the first place?

[olschooler]

Landing a commercial jet on water is just as deadly as trying to land on concrete.With the engines being positioned under the wings they rip the wings right off as soon as they hit the water which in turn breaks apart the fuselage.I.E Ethopian Airline crash on water after the shitheaded hijakers didn't believe the captain when he said they were low on fuel so they told him to keep going to Cuba but surprise OUTTA FUEL!! the pilot did an awesome job trying to land it on the water though.

[jpg0572]

Why is landing on the water just as bad?

[olschooler]

The reason is because at speeds of 100+ mph water is just like concrete.If you've ever water skied and wiped out at anything above 40mph you'd know how hard water becomes at speed.The other thing about landing an aircraft of that size on water,with the engines hanging under the wing they dig in bigtime causin the wings and fuselage to rip apart.

[FusilliJerry82]

What the hell was wrong with the windsheild?

[jpg0572]

nothing - the engines all stopped.

[FusilliJerry82]

I mean at the end where they couldn't clean it off. It looked like it was frosted over with heat or something.

[jpg0572]

you are referring to the windshield?

[FusilliJerry82]

Yes.

[jpg0572]

I think the volcanic blowout 'sandblasted' the windshield making it difficult to see. Anyone else have a thought about this? Also, what has become of TWA800 - have they figured that out yet?

[olschooler]

Yea jpg0572 it was completely pitted, even worse then Sand Bl.TWA800 officially solved:Gas fumes in center fuel tank ignited but theres still a shitload of people say they saw a missle streak towards that jet and US navy was in the area but they certainly would'nt admit to accidentley fireing the missile.

[jpg0572]

What caused the fuel tank to ignite? Has this happend before TWA800?

[stupidgirl2580]

a wire was cut and it the electricity ignited the fuel

[jpg0572]

what do you mean a wire was cut? How does that happen? Would you fly knowing that could happen again?

[kggoh]

but if use explosive to destroying the bolts holding engines can only use once, once detach the engines, then the plane has only one choice, land on water, and will make sometimes stupid pilots activate the explosion accidentally.

[Arch91]

If they land on the sea the engines on the 747 will gather water into the engine causing severe drag thus tearing the plane apart. And water landings are extremely hard to pull off and travelling at 500 km it would be hard to survive.

[kggoh]

i think if possible the plane manufacturer should think of a way to let the pilots have a decision to either give up their engines or move the wings or engines up when they decide to land on water. I know this is stupid, but is just a thought, just to prevent the engine touch the water.

[toddi1971]

No, dropping the engines schould not be a too big issue, if it helps touch down on sea.

[kggoh]

what i mean was they should let the pilots have a choice to lift up their engines or any possible way to make the engines not touching the water during a emergency landing on water.

[toddi1971]

Yes, got what you mean. I am thinking of small explosives destroying the bolts holding the engines, so they could fall off just before plane hits the sea. Anyway i am not shure if it really helps. Probably just a bit.

[jpg0572]

explosives? Don't we have enough of that on planes already? [See Phillipine Airlines Flight 434]

[nintendogamer16]

i dont know how to swim............is that all they are fucken worrying about???

[kggoh]

lol, and we might be eaten by shark, haha...first worry abt whether u can survive the first impact if landed on water

[jpg0572]

Yeah - what's wrong with landing on the water?

[Thinnet]

They have inflatable boats inside the plane.. so i'd much rather land on the water.

[olschooler]

Well see for yourself.Heres video of Ethiopian airliner crashing on water after running out of fuel because the highjackers didnt believe the captain when he said he was running out and had to land.For some reason this won't let me post a link but its youtube/com/watch?v=-GAg5Y5WK2­4